Treatment of Complex Anal Fistula by Video-Assisted Anal Fistula Treatment Combined with Anal Fistula Plug: A Single-Center Study

Impact of Preoperative Three-Dimensional Endoanal Ultrasound on the Surgical Outcome of Primary Fistula in Ano. A Multi-Center Observational Study of 253 Patients

PURPOSE

To evaluate the impact of preoperative three-dimensional endoanal ultrasound (3D-EAUS) on the clinical outcome of anal fistula surgery.

METHODS

The research consisted of multi-center retrospective case-control study including 253 consecutive adult patients undergoing surgery for confirmed or suspected primary fistula in ano who had undergone preoperative 3D-EAUS evaluation between January 2011 and January 2021. Main outcome measures were the concordance (K value) between ultrasound results and surgery in the identification of fistulas internal openings, primary tracts and secondary extensions and the 6 and 12 months success rate in patients with concordant and discordant findings.

RESULTS

A good agreement in the identification of the main fistulas characteristics between ultrasound results and operative findings was found. A significant difference (P < .0001; Fisher's exact test) in the success rate was found between patients with concordant and discordant ultrasound results and operative findings in identification or location of internal opening. Particularly, all the 11 (4.8%) patients with discordant results experimented a failure of the surgical procedure at 6 months follow-up. At re-operation, the shift from discordant to concordant results was associated with an 81.8% 12 months success-rate.

CONCLUSION

The three-dimensional endoanal ultrasound preoperative evaluation may have a relevant impact on the outcome of a defined group of patients undergoing surgery for anal fistula, since the careful evaluation of ultrasound results could simplify the internal orifice intra-operative detection and improve the success rate.

Evaluation of the Effectiveness of a Combination of Chinese Herbal Fumigation Sitz-Bath and Red Ointment in Managing Postoperative Wound Healing and Pain Control in Anal Fistula Patients

Objective

To explore the efficacy of Chinese herbal fumigation and sitz-bath combined with red ointment in the treatment of postoperative wound healing and pain control in anal fistula patients.

Methods

A total of 118 anal fistula patients were selected as the study population, randomly divided into two groups, i.e., the research group (n = 60) and the control group (n = 60). The control group was treated with red ointment therapy for postoperative wound healing and pain while the research group was treated with a combination of ointment and traditional Chinese medicine fumigation sitz-bath, Postoperative wound healing, pain control, and safety evaluation were compared between the two groups. Results. The total effective rate in the research group was 96.67%, which was significantly higher than that in the control group (93.10%), and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). The VAS scores and postoperative wound healing times in the research group were significantly lower than those in the control group. The difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). A day after postoperative treatment, there was no significant difference (P > 0.05) in TNF-α and IL-6 levels between the two study groups; however, from day 3 to day 14 the levels were statistically different. TNF-α and IL-6 levels in research group were significantly lower than those in the control group. The difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). The incidence of postoperative complications in the research group at 6.67% was statistically significant (P < 0.05), significantly lower than 13.79% in the control group. Conclusion. Postoperative intervention with Chinese herbal fumigation and sitz-bath combined with red ointment can effectively reduce the wound healing duration and lower the degree of pain experienced by anal fistula patients, thereby improving their quality of life.

The Value of Transrectal Ultrasound in the Preoperative Diagnosis of Complex Anal Fistula (CAF): Based on a Retrospective Cohort Study

Objective

A case-control study was employed to retrospectively analyze the value of transrectal ultrasound in the preoperative diagnosis of complex anal fistula (CAF).

Methods

The clinical data of 128 patients with CAF treated in our hospital from March 2019 to June 2021 were analyzed retrospectively. All patients were examined by transrectal ultrasound and MRI with Hitachi HI Vision Ascendus ultrasound diagnostic apparatus and MRI. The general data of the patients (age, sex, course of disease, complications, and previous operation history) and ultrasonic image characteristics were recorded. The consistency of internal orifice, head, branch/abscess, and abscess detected by ultrasound, MRI, and ultrasound combined with MRI were compared, and the sensitivity, accuracy, and specificity of ultrasound, MRI, and the combination of ultrasound and MRI (ultrasound+MRI) in the diagnosis of different Parks classification of anal fistula (AF) were compared.

Results

The ultrasound images of the rectal probe in typical cases were compared with the MRI images. The characteristics of the ultrasound images were as follows: the outer orifice of AF was a thin strip of mixed echo or low echo leading to the skin side, and the inner orifice showed local dilated low echo, mixed echo, or interruption of mucosal continuity. The following are the MRI image features: abnormal long bar signal shadow from the dorsal side of the end of the coccyx to the S5 plane, low signal on T1WI, high signal on T2WI, blurred boundary, uneven signal, bifurcation in the lower end of the tail for "Y" shape, one branch opening at the body surface at about 6 o'clock, the other walking horizontally, passing through the levator ani muscle to the right posterior position of the rectum at about 6:00 o'clock, and penetrating the inner mouth of the rectum at 6 o'clock. The detection of internal orifice, head, branch/abscess, and abscess were compared by three examination methods. There was significant difference in the detection rate of internal orifice and branch/purulent cavity among the three methods (P < 0.05). The detection rates of internal mouth and branch/abscess cavity by ultrasound and MRI (94.77% and 94.94%) were higher than those by single ultrasound (75.16% and 79.78%) and MRI (81.05% and 83.15%) (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in the detection rate of ultrasound, MRI internal orifice, and branch/purulent cavity (P > 0.05). There was no significant difference in the detection rate of supervisor and abscess among the three methods (P > 0.05). The results of operation included transsphincter type (n = 53), intersphincter type (n = 45), and superior sphincter type (n = 30). Analysis of transsphincter type AF detected by three methods: 42 cases of transsphincter type AF and 86 cases of nonsphincter type AF were detected by ultrasound, 36 cases of transsphincter type AF and 92 cases of nontranssphincter type AF were detected by MRI, 57 cases of transsphincter type AF and 71 cases of nonsphincter type AF were detected by ultrasound and MRI. The comparison of the efficacy of the three methods in the diagnosis of transsphincter AF and the sensitivity of the three methods in the diagnosis of transsphincter AF showed significant difference (P < 0.05). The sensitivity of ultrasound and MRI in the diagnosis of transsphincter AF (96.23%) was higher than those of single ultrasound (67.92%) and MRI (64.15%) (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in the accuracy and specificity of the three methods in the diagnosis of transsphincter AF (P > 0.05). There were 41 cases of intersphincter type AF and 87 cases of nonsphincter type AF detected by ultrasound, 38 cases of intersphincter type AF and 90 cases of nonsphincter intersphincter type AF detected by MRI, and 45 cases of intersphincter type AF and 83 cases of nonsphincter intersphincter type AF detected by ultrasound and MRI. The sensitivity and accuracy of the three methods in the diagnosis of intersphincter AF were statistically significant (P < 0.05). The sensitivity and accuracy (100.00% and 100.00%) of ultrasound and MRI in the diagnosis of intersphincter AF were higher than those of single ultrasound (66.67% and 79.69%) and MRI (71.11% and 85.16%) (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in the specificity of the three methods in the diagnosis of intersphincter AF (P > 0.05). The results of three methods were compared, including 24 cases of superior sphincter type AF and 89 cases of nonsuperior sphincter type AF, 21 cases of superior sphincter type AF, and 107 cases of nonsuperior sphincter type AF detected by MRI and 93 cases of superior sphincter type AF and 128cases of nonsuperior sphincter type AF detected by ultrasound and MRI. There was no significant difference in the sensitivity, accuracy, and specificity of the three methods in the diagnosis of superior sphincter AF (P > 0.05).

Conclusion

The sphincter, anorectal, and surrounding tissues were clearly demonstrated by transrectal ultrasound. The internal orifice, head, branch/abscess, abscess, and the relationship between abscess and sphincter in the diagnosis of CAF were in good agreement with the surgical results. Ultrasound+MRI can take into account the advantages of ultrasound and MRI, make up for each other, and improve the detection rate of internal orifice and branch/abscess. It can improve the sensitivity of diagnosis of transsphincter AF and the sensitivity and accuracy of intersphincter AF, which can provide intuitive and valuable imaging information for surgical intervention.

Comparison between recent sphincter-sparing procedures for complex anal fistulas-ligation of intersphincteric tract vs transanal opening of intersphincteric space

Complex anal fistulas are difficult to treat. The main reasons for this are a higher recurrence rate and the risk of disrupting the continence mechanism because of sphincter involvement. Due to this, several sphincter-sparing procedures have been developed in the last two decades. Though moderately successful in simple fistulas (50%-75% healing rate), the healing rates in complex fistulas for most of these procedures has been dismal. Only two procedures, ligation of intersphincteric fistula tract and transanal opening of intersphincteric space have been shown to have good success rates in complex fistulas (60%-95%). Both of these procedures preserve continence while achieving high success rates. In this opinion review, I shall outline the history, compare the pros and cons, indications and contraindications and future application of both these procedures for the management of complex anal fistulas.

Video-assisted anal fistula treatment for complex anorectal fistulas in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Video-assisted anal fistula treatment (VAAFT) has gained increasing acceptance as a sphincter-sparing procedure for treating complex anorectal fistulas (CAF), but no unequivocal conclusions can yet be drawn regarding its ultimate effectiveness. We reviewed the literature and performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of VAAFT in CAF patients.

METHODS

The study protocol was registered with the PROSPERO database (CRD42021279085). A systematic literature search was performed in the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases up to June 2021 with no restriction on language based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. We used the keywords video-assisted surgery, video-assisted anal fistula treatment, and complex anorectal fistula to identify relevant studies.

RESULTS

Fourteen trials (7 prospective and 7 retrospective) with a total of 1201 patients (mean age 43.5 years) were included. The median follow-up duration was 16.5(8-48) months. Pooled analysis showed that the rates of success, recurrence and postoperative complication across the studies were 83% (95% CI 81-85%, I² = 37.9%), 16% (95% CI 14-18%, I² = 4.8%), 11% (95% CI 7-15%, I² = 72.1%), respectively. The postoperative Jorge-Wexner score used to assess the level of anal incontinence was 1.09 (95% CI, 0.9-1.27, I² = 74.6%). The internal opening detection rate was 97.6% (95% CI 96.1-99.6%, I² = 48.2%). Recurrence rates varied according to the closure method of internal opening from 21.4% after using staplers, 18.7% after suturing, to 23.5% after advancement flap. The hospital stay was 3.15 days (95% CI 2.96-3.35, I² = 49.7%). Subgroup analysis indicated that the risk of heterogeneity in the urine retention group was higher  compared with that of the overall group and that retrospective studies may be the source of heterogeneity for postoperative anal incontinence. r . Sensitivity analysis confirmed the stability of the pooled results. Begg's and Egger's tests showed no evidence of publication bias.

CONCLUSIONS

According to the available evidence, VAAFT may be a valuable alternative to fistulotomy or seton in treating CAF and has the additional long-term benefits of reducing anal incontinence and surgical morbidity, permitting earlier healing and accelerated rehabilitation.