1
|
Akhtar MU, Bhatti ME, Fredericks S. What factors influence patient autonomy in healthcare decision-making? A systematic review of studies from the Global South. Nurs Ethics 2024:9697330241272794. [PMID: 39175161 DOI: 10.1177/09697330241272794] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/24/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The principle of respect for autonomy (PRA) is a central tenet of bioethics. In the quest for a global bioethics, it is pertinent to ask whether this principle can be applied as it is to cultures and societies that are devoid of the Western sociopolitical historical pressures that led to its emergence. Relational autonomists have argued for a more inclusive approach to patient autonomy which takes into account factors such as interdependency and social relations. However, at the outset of any relational approach, it is necessary to identify underlying factors that influence patient autonomy in non-Western cultures. OBJECTIVE To conduct a review of the literature to uncover the mechanisms through which social, cultural, and religious factors influence and impact the application of the PRA in healthcare decision-making in non-Western cultures and societies. METHODS We conducted a systematic review through a comprehensive search of three major electronic databases of biomedical sciences. Returned citations were imported to Covidence, full texts were assessed for eligibility, included articles were thoroughly reviewed and data was synthesized. PRISMA guidelines were followed. RESULTS Our search retrieved 590 non-duplicate results, 50 of which were included after screening and full-text eligibility checks. The included studies were predominantly qualitative in nature, with few quantitative, mixed-methods, and review studies included. Our synthesis of data identified nine key factors that influenced patients' autonomous decision-making through cultural, social, religious, or intersectional pathways. CONCLUSION Two main conclusions emerge from this review. Firstly, there is a notable dearth of bioethical research examining the influence of diverse factors on patients' inclination towards different conceptions of autonomy. Secondly, the analysis of prevalent collectivist cultures and deference of autonomy adds value to the solution-oriented relational autonomy debate. This raises questions regarding how decision-making can be truly autonomous in the presence of such large-scale factors, warranting further attention.
Collapse
|
2
|
Greer RC, Kanthawang N, Roest J, Perrone C, Wangrangsimakul T, Parker M, Kelley M, Cheah PY. The challenges and potential solutions of achieving meaningful consent amongst research participants in northern Thailand: a qualitative study. BMC Med Ethics 2023; 24:111. [PMID: 38115021 PMCID: PMC10729394 DOI: 10.1186/s12910-023-00991-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2023] [Accepted: 11/25/2023] [Indexed: 12/21/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Achieving meaningful consent can be challenging, particularly in contexts of diminished literacy, yet is a vital part of participant protection in global health research. METHOD We explored the challenges and potential solutions of achieving meaningful consent through a qualitative study in a predominantly hill tribe ethnic minority population in northern Thailand, a culturally distinctive population with low literacy. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 37 respondents who had participated in scrub typhus clinical research, their family members, researchers and other key informants. A thematic analysis was conducted. RESULTS Our analysis identified four interrelated themes surrounding participants' ability to give consent: varying degrees of research understanding, limitations of using informal translators, issues impacting decisions to join research, and voluntariness of consent. Suggestions for achieving more meaningful consent included the use of formal translators and community engagement with research populations. CONCLUSIONS Participant's agency in decision making to join research should be supported, but research information needs to be communicated to potential participants in a way that they can understand. We found that improved understanding about the study and its potential benefits and harms goes beyond literacy or translation and requires attention to social and cultural factors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachel C Greer
- Mahidol Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit, Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
| | - Nipaphan Kanthawang
- Mahidol Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit, Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Jennifer Roest
- The Ethox Centre, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Carlo Perrone
- Mahidol Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit, Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Tri Wangrangsimakul
- Mahidol Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit, Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Michael Parker
- The Ethox Centre, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Maureen Kelley
- Wellcome Centre for Ethics & Humanities, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Phaik Yeong Cheah
- Centre for Tropical Medicine and Global Health, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Subramanian A, Lee SI, Hemali Sudasinghe SPB, Wambua S, Phillips K, Singh M, Azcoaga-Lorenzo A, Cockburn N, Wang J, Fagbamigbe A, Usman M, Damase-Michel C, Yau C, Kent L, McCowan C, OReilly D, Santorelli G, Hope H, Kennedy J, Mhereeg M, Abel KM, Eastwood KA, Black M, Loane M, Moss N, Brophy S, Brocklehurst P, Dolk H, Nelson-Piercy C, Nirantharakumar K. Detection and evaluation of signals associated with exposure to individual and combination of medications in pregnancy: a signal detection study protocol. BMJ Open 2023; 13:e073162. [PMID: 37813531 PMCID: PMC10565241 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-073162] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2023] [Accepted: 09/15/2023] [Indexed: 10/13/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Considering the high prevalence of polypharmacy in pregnant women and the knowledge gap in the risk-benefit safety profile of their often-complex treatment plan, more research is needed to optimise prescribing. In this study, we aim to detect adverse and protective effect signals of exposure to individual and pairwise combinations of medications during pregnancy. METHODS AND ANALYSIS Using a range of real-world data sources from the UK, we aim to conduct a pharmacovigilance study to assess the safety of medications prescribed during the preconception period (3 months prior to conception) and first trimester of pregnancy. Women aged between 15 and 49 years with a record of pregnancy within the Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) Pregnancy Register, the Welsh Secure Anonymised Information Linkage (SAIL), the Scottish Morbidity Record (SMR) data sets and the Northern Ireland Maternity System (NIMATS) will be included. A series of case control studies will be conducted to estimate measures of disproportionality, detecting signals of association between a range of pregnancy outcomes and exposure to individual and combinations of medications. A multidisciplinary expert team will be invited to a signal detection workshop. By employing a structured framework, signals will be transparently assessed by each member of the team using a questionnaire appraising the signals on aspects of temporality, selection, time and measurement-related biases and confounding by underlying disease or comedications. Through group discussion, the expert team will reach consensus on each of the medication exposure-outcome signal, thereby excluding spurious signals, leaving signals suggestive of causal associations for further evaluation. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION Ethical approval has been obtained from the Independent Scientific Advisory Committee, SAIL Information Governance Review Panel, University of St. Andrews Teaching and Research Ethics Committee and Office for Research Ethics Committees Northern Ireland (ORECNI) for access and use of CPRD, SAIL, SMR and NIMATS data, respectively.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Siang Ing Lee
- Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | | | - Steven Wambua
- Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Katherine Phillips
- Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Megha Singh
- Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Amaya Azcoaga-Lorenzo
- Division of Population and Behavioural Sciences, University of Saint Andrews School of Medicine, St. Andrews, Fife, UK
- Hospital Rey Juan Carlos. Research Network on Chronicity, Primary Care and Health Promotion-RICAPPS (RICORS), Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Fundación Jimenez Diaz, Madrid, Spain
| | - Neil Cockburn
- Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Jingya Wang
- Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Adeniyi Fagbamigbe
- Division of Population and Behavioural Sciences, University of Saint Andrews School of Medicine, St. Andrews, Fife, UK
- Department of Epidemiology and Medical Statistics, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria
| | - Muhammad Usman
- Division of Population and Behavioural Sciences, University of Saint Andrews School of Medicine, St. Andrews, Fife, UK
| | - Christine Damase-Michel
- Medical and Clinical Pharmacology, School of Medicine, Université Toulouse III, Toulouse, France
- Center for Epidemiology and Research in Population Health (CERPOP), INSERM, Toulouse, France
| | - Christopher Yau
- Nuffield Department of Women's and Reproductive Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Lisa Kent
- Centre for Public Health, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK
| | - Colin McCowan
- Division of Population and Behavioural Sciences, University of Saint Andrews School of Medicine, St. Andrews, Fife, UK
| | - Dermot OReilly
- Centre for Public Health, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK
| | | | - Holly Hope
- Centre for Women's Mental Health, Faculty of Biology Medicine & Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | | | | | - Kathryn Mary Abel
- Centre for Women's Mental Health, Faculty of Biology Medicine & Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
- Manchester Mental Health & Social Care Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Kelly-Ann Eastwood
- Centre for Public Health, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK
- University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK
| | - Mairead Black
- Aberdeen Centre for Women's Health Research, School of Medicine, Medical Science and Nutrition, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Maria Loane
- The Institute of Nursing and Health Research, University of Ulster, Belfast, UK
| | | | - Sinead Brophy
- Data Science, Medical School, Swansea University, Swansea, UK
| | - Peter Brocklehurst
- Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Helen Dolk
- The Institute of Nursing and Health Research, University of Ulster, Belfast, UK
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Musara P, Hartmann M, Ryan JH, Reddy K, Ggita J, Mutero P, Macagna N, Taulo F, Mgodi NM, Piper J, van der Straten A. Understanding the role of men in women's use of the vaginal ring and oral PrEP during pregnancy and breastfeeding: multi-stakeholder perspectives. AFRICAN JOURNAL OF AIDS RESEARCH : AJAR 2022; 21:354-363. [PMID: 36538544 PMCID: PMC9983781 DOI: 10.2989/16085906.2022.2138474] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2021] [Revised: 07/01/2022] [Accepted: 10/01/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
We examined men's influence on women's interest in biomedical HIV prevention during pregnancy and breastfeeding through structured questionnaires and focus group discussions with currently or recently pregnant and breastfeeding (P/BF) women (n = 65), men with P/BF partners (n = 63) and mothers/mothers-in-law of P/BF women (n = 68) in eastern and southern Africa. Data were transcribed, coded and summarised into analytical memos. Men were depicted by most participants as joint decision-makers and influencers of women's use of HIV prevention. Cultural and religious norms depicting men as heads, breadwinners and protectors of the family were cited to legitimise their involvement in decision-making. Male partner education and engagement were recommended to garner their support in women's HIV prevention. This study elucidates how P/BF women's ability to prevent HIV is shaped by traditional and contemporary gender norms in social settings and locations where the study was conducted. Findings may aid intervention design to engage men for P/BF women's effective use of microbicide and oral PrEP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Petina Musara
- Clinical Trials Research Centre, University of Zimbabwe, Harare, Zimbabwe
| | - Miriam Hartmann
- Women’s Global Health Imperative, RTI International, Berkeley, USA
| | - Julia H Ryan
- Women’s Global Health Imperative, RTI International, Berkeley, USA
| | - Krishnaveni Reddy
- Wits Reproductive Health and HIV Institute, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
| | - Joseph Ggita
- Johns Hopkins University Research Collaboration, Makerere University, Uganda
| | - Prisca Mutero
- Clinical Trials Research Centre, University of Zimbabwe, Harare, Zimbabwe
| | | | - Frank Taulo
- Johns Hopkins Project-College of Medicine, University of Malawi, Blantyre, Malawi
| | - Nyaradzo M Mgodi
- Clinical Trials Research Centre, University of Zimbabwe, Harare, Zimbabwe
| | | | - Ariane van der Straten
- Center for AIDS Prevention Studies, University of California San Francisco, USA; and ASTRA Consulting, Kensington, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|