1
|
Cengiz N, Kabanda SM, Moodley K. Cross-border data sharing through the lens of research ethics committee members in sub-Saharan Africa. PLoS One 2024; 19:e0303828. [PMID: 38781141 PMCID: PMC11115285 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0303828] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2023] [Accepted: 05/01/2024] [Indexed: 05/25/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Several factors thwart successful data sharing-ambiguous or fragmented regulatory landscapes, conflicting institutional/researcher interests and varying levels of data science-related expertise are among these. Traditional ethics oversight mechanisms and practices may not be well placed to guarantee adequate research oversight given the unique challenges presented by digital technologies and artificial intelligence (AI). Data-intensive research has raised new, contextual ethics and legal challenges that are particularly relevant in an African research setting. Yet, no empirical research has been conducted to explore these challenges. MATERIALS AND METHODS We explored REC members' views and experiences on data sharing by conducting 20 semi-structured interviews online between June 2022 and February 2023. Using purposive sampling and snowballing, we recruited representatives across sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). We transcribed verbatim and thematically analysed the data with Atlas.ti V22. RESULTS Three dominant themes were identified: (i) experiences in reviewing data sharing protocols, (ii) perceptions of data transfer tools and (iii) ethical, legal and social challenges of data sharing. Several sub-themes emerged as: (i.a) frequency of and approaches used in reviewing data sharing protocols, (i.b) practical/technical challenges, (i.c) training, (ii.a) ideal structure of data transfer tools, (ii.b) key elements of data transfer tools, (ii.c) implementation level, (ii.d) key stakeholders in developing and reviewing a data transfer agreement (DTA), (iii.a) confidentiality and anonymity, (iii.b) consent, (iii.c) regulatory frameworks, and (iii.d) stigmatisation and discrimination. CONCLUSIONS Our results indicated variability in REC members' perceptions, suboptimal awareness of the existence of data protection laws and a unanimously expressed need for REC member training. To promote efficient data sharing within and across SSA, guidelines that incorporate ethical, legal and social elements need to be developed in consultation with relevant stakeholders and field experts, along with the training accreditation of REC members in the review of data-intensive protocols.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nezerith Cengiz
- Department of Medicine, Division for Medical Ethics and Law, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Siti M. Kabanda
- Department of Medicine, Division for Medical Ethics and Law, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Keymanthri Moodley
- Department of Medicine, Division for Medical Ethics and Law, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Harris J, Germain J, McCoy E, Schofield R. Ethical guidance for conducting health research with online communities: A scoping review of existing guidance. PLoS One 2024; 19:e0302924. [PMID: 38758778 PMCID: PMC11101025 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0302924] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/05/2023] [Accepted: 04/15/2024] [Indexed: 05/19/2024] Open
Abstract
Online research methods have grown in popularity due in part to the globalised and far-reaching nature of the internet but also linked to the Covid-19 pandemic whereby restrictions to travel and face to face contact necessitated a shift in methods of research recruitment and data collection. Ethical guidance exists to support researchers in conducting online research, however this is lacking within health fields. This scoping review aims to synthesise formal ethical guidance for applying online methods within health research as well as provide examples of where guidance has been used. A systematic search of literature was conducted, restricted to English language records between 2013 and 2022. Eligibility focused on whether the records were providing ethical guidance or recommendations, were situated or relevant to health disciplines, and involved the use or discussion of online research methods. Following exclusion of ineligible records and duplicate removal, three organisational ethical guidance and 24 research papers were charted and thematically analysed. Four key themes were identified within the guidance documents, 1) consent, 2) confidentiality and privacy, 3) protecting participants from harm and 4) protecting researchers from harm with the research papers describing additional context and understanding around these issues. The review identified that there are currently no specific guidelines aimed at health researchers, with the most cited guidance coming from broader methodological perspectives and disciplines or auxiliary fields. All guidance discussed each of the four key themes within the wider context of sensitive topics and vulnerable populations, areas and issues which are often prominent within health research thus highlighting the need for unifying guidance specific for health researchers. Further research should aim to understand better how online health studies apply ethical principles, to support in informing gaps across both research and guidance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jane Harris
- Public Health Institute, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - Jennifer Germain
- Public Health Institute, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - Ellie McCoy
- Public Health Institute, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - Rosemary Schofield
- Public Health Institute, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Blatter TU, Witte H, Fasquelle-Lopez J, Theodoros Naka C, Raisaro JL, Leichtle AB. The BioRef Infrastructure, a Framework for Real-Time, Federated, Privacy-Preserving, and Personalized Reference Intervals: Design, Development, and Application. J Med Internet Res 2023; 25:e47254. [PMID: 37851984 PMCID: PMC10620636 DOI: 10.2196/47254] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2023] [Revised: 07/13/2023] [Accepted: 07/14/2023] [Indexed: 10/20/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Reference intervals (RIs) for patient test results are in standard use across many medical disciplines, allowing physicians to identify measurements indicating potentially pathological states with relative ease. The process of inferring cohort-specific RIs is, however, often ignored because of the high costs and cumbersome efforts associated with it. Sophisticated analysis tools are required to automatically infer relevant and locally specific RIs directly from routine laboratory data. These tools would effectively connect clinical laboratory databases to physicians and provide personalized target ranges for the respective cohort population. OBJECTIVE This study aims to describe the BioRef infrastructure, a multicentric governance and IT framework for the estimation and assessment of patient group-specific RIs from routine clinical laboratory data using an innovative decentralized data-sharing approach and a sophisticated, clinically oriented graphical user interface for data analysis. METHODS A common governance agreement and interoperability standards have been established, allowing the harmonization of multidimensional laboratory measurements from multiple clinical databases into a unified "big data" resource. International coding systems, such as the International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision (ICD-10); unique identifiers for medical devices from the Global Unique Device Identification Database; type identifiers from the Global Medical Device Nomenclature; and a universal transfer logic, such as the Resource Description Framework (RDF), are used to align the routine laboratory data of each data provider for use within the BioRef framework. With a decentralized data-sharing approach, the BioRef data can be evaluated by end users from each cohort site following a strict "no copy, no move" principle, that is, only data aggregates for the intercohort analysis of target ranges are exchanged. RESULTS The TI4Health distributed and secure analytics system was used to implement the proposed federated and privacy-preserving approach and comply with the limitations applied to sensitive patient data. Under the BioRef interoperability consensus, clinical partners enable the computation of RIs via the TI4Health graphical user interface for query without exposing the underlying raw data. The interface was developed for use by physicians and clinical laboratory specialists and allows intuitive and interactive data stratification by patient factors (age, sex, and personal medical history) as well as laboratory analysis determinants (device, analyzer, and test kit identifier). This consolidated effort enables the creation of extremely detailed and patient group-specific queries, allowing the generation of individualized, covariate-adjusted RIs on the fly. CONCLUSIONS With the BioRef-TI4Health infrastructure, a framework for clinical physicians and researchers to define precise RIs immediately in a convenient, privacy-preserving, and reproducible manner has been implemented, promoting a vital part of practicing precision medicine while streamlining compliance and avoiding transfers of raw patient data. This new approach can provide a crucial update on RIs and improve patient care for personalized medicine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tobias Ueli Blatter
- University Institute of Clinical Chemistry, University Hospital Bern, Bern, Switzerland
- Graduate School for Health Sciences, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Harald Witte
- University Institute of Clinical Chemistry, University Hospital Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | | | - Christos Theodoros Naka
- University Institute of Clinical Chemistry, University Hospital Bern, Bern, Switzerland
- Laboratory of Biometry, University of Thessaly, Volos, Greece
| | - Jean Louis Raisaro
- Biomedical Data Science Center, University Hospital Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Alexander Benedikt Leichtle
- University Institute of Clinical Chemistry, University Hospital Bern, Bern, Switzerland
- Center for Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Adebamowo CA, Callier S, Akintola S, Maduka O, Jegede A, Arima C, Ogundiran T, Adebamowo SN. The promise of data science for health research in Africa. Nat Commun 2023; 14:6084. [PMID: 37770478 PMCID: PMC10539491 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-023-41809-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2021] [Accepted: 09/15/2023] [Indexed: 09/30/2023] Open
Abstract
Data science health research promises tremendous benefits for African populations, but its implementation is fraught with substantial ethical governance risks that could thwart the delivery of these anticipated benefits. We discuss emerging efforts to build ethical governance frameworks for data science health research in Africa and the opportunities to advance these through investments by African governments and institutions, international funding organizations and collaborations for research and capacity development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Clement A Adebamowo
- Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, and Greenebaum Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
- Department of Research, Center for Bioethics and Research, Ibadan, Nigeria.
| | - Shawneequa Callier
- Department of Clinical Research and Leadership, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, The George Washington University, Washington DC, USA
- Center for Research on Genomics and Global Health, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Simisola Akintola
- Department of Research, Center for Bioethics and Research, Ibadan, Nigeria
- Department of Business Law, Faculty of Law, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria
- Department of Bioethics and Medical Humanities, Faculty of Multidisciplinary Studies, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria
| | - Oluchi Maduka
- Department of Research, Center for Bioethics and Research, Ibadan, Nigeria
| | - Ayodele Jegede
- Department of Research, Center for Bioethics and Research, Ibadan, Nigeria
- Department of Bioethics and Medical Humanities, Faculty of Multidisciplinary Studies, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria
- Department of Sociology, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria
| | | | - Temidayo Ogundiran
- Department of Research, Center for Bioethics and Research, Ibadan, Nigeria
- Department of Bioethics and Medical Humanities, Faculty of Multidisciplinary Studies, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria
- Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria
| | - Sally N Adebamowo
- Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, and Greenebaum Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Department of Research, Center for Bioethics and Research, Ibadan, Nigeria
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Parkinson B. We need to talk about research ethics committees (RECs). Evid Based Nurs 2023; 26:85-86. [PMID: 37137674 DOI: 10.1136/ebnurs-2023-103748] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/21/2023] [Indexed: 05/05/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Ben Parkinson
- Nursing and Community Health, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Big Data in Laboratory Medicine—FAIR Quality for AI? Diagnostics (Basel) 2022; 12:diagnostics12081923. [PMID: 36010273 PMCID: PMC9406962 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics12081923] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2022] [Revised: 08/05/2022] [Accepted: 08/06/2022] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Laboratory medicine is a digital science. Every large hospital produces a wealth of data each day—from simple numerical results from, e.g., sodium measurements to highly complex output of “-omics” analyses, as well as quality control results and metadata. Processing, connecting, storing, and ordering extensive parts of these individual data requires Big Data techniques. Whereas novel technologies such as artificial intelligence and machine learning have exciting application for the augmentation of laboratory medicine, the Big Data concept remains fundamental for any sophisticated data analysis in large databases. To make laboratory medicine data optimally usable for clinical and research purposes, they need to be FAIR: findable, accessible, interoperable, and reusable. This can be achieved, for example, by automated recording, connection of devices, efficient ETL (Extract, Transform, Load) processes, careful data governance, and modern data security solutions. Enriched with clinical data, laboratory medicine data allow a gain in pathophysiological insights, can improve patient care, or can be used to develop reference intervals for diagnostic purposes. Nevertheless, Big Data in laboratory medicine do not come without challenges: the growing number of analyses and data derived from them is a demanding task to be taken care of. Laboratory medicine experts are and will be needed to drive this development, take an active role in the ongoing digitalization, and provide guidance for their clinical colleagues engaging with the laboratory data in research.
Collapse
|