1
|
Barksdale S, Stark Taylor S, Criss S, Kemper K, Friedman DB, Thompson W, Donelle L, MacGilvray P, Natafgi N. Improving Patient Health Literacy During Telehealth Visits Through Remote Teach-Back Methods Training for Family Medicine Residents: Pilot 2-Arm Cluster, Nonrandomized Controlled Trial. JMIR Form Res 2023; 7:e51541. [PMID: 37971799 PMCID: PMC10690523 DOI: 10.2196/51541] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2023] [Revised: 09/29/2023] [Accepted: 10/14/2023] [Indexed: 11/19/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND As telemedicine plays an increasing role in health care delivery, providers are expected to receive adequate training to effectively communicate with patients during telemedicine encounters. Teach-back is an approach that verifies patients' understanding of the health care information provided by health care professionals. Including patients in the design and development of teach-back training content for providers can result in more relevant training content. However, only a limited number of studies embrace patient engagement in this capacity, and none for remote care settings. OBJECTIVE We aimed to design and evaluate the feasibility of patient-centered, telehealth-focused teach-back training for family medicine residents to promote the use of teach-back during remote visits. METHODS We codeveloped the POTENTIAL (Platform to Enhance Teach-Back Methods in Virtual Care Visits) curriculum for medical residents to promote teach-back during remote visits. A patient participated in the development of the workshop's videos and in a patient-provider panel about teach-back. We conducted a pilot, 2-arm cluster, nonrandomized controlled trial. Family medicine residents at the intervention site (n=12) received didactic and simulation-based training in addition to weekly cues-to-action. Assessment included pre- and postsurveys, observations of residents, and interviews with patients and providers. To assess differences between pre- and postintervention scores among the intervention group, chi-square and 1-tailed t tests were used. A total of 4 difference-in-difference models were constructed to evaluate prepost differences between intervention and control groups for each of the following outcomes: familiarity with teach-back, importance of teach-back, confidence in teach-back ability, and ease of use of teach-back. RESULTS Medical residents highly rated their experience of the teach-back training sessions (mean 8.6/10). Most residents (9/12, 75%) used plain language during training simulations, and over half asked the role-playing patient to use their own words to explain what they were told during the encounter. Postintervention, there was an increase in residents' confidence in their ability to use teach-back (mean 7.33 vs 7.83; P=.04), but there was no statistically significant difference in familiarity with, perception of importance, or ease of use of teach-back. None of the difference-in-difference models were statistically significant. The main barrier to practicing teach-back was time constraints. CONCLUSIONS This study highlights ways to effectively integrate best-practice training in telehealth teach-back skills into a medical residency program. At the same time, this pilot study points to important opportunities for improvement for similar interventions in future larger-scale implementation efforts, as well as ways to mitigate providers' concerns or barriers to incorporating teach-back in their practice. Teach-back can impact remote practice by increasing providers' ability to actively engage and empower patients by using the features (whiteboards, chat rooms, and mini-views) of their remote platform.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shanikque Barksdale
- Department of Health Services Policy and Management, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, United States
| | - Shannon Stark Taylor
- School of Medicine Greenville, University of South Carolina, Greenville, SC, United States
- Family Medicine Residency Greenville, Prisma Health, Greenville, SC, United States
| | - Shaniece Criss
- Department of Health Sciences, Furman University, Greenville, SC, United States
| | - Karen Kemper
- Department of Public Health Sciences, College of Behavioral, Social and Health Sciences, Clemson University, Clemson, SC, United States
| | - Daniela B Friedman
- Department of Health Promotion, Education, and Behavior, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, United States
| | - Wanda Thompson
- Patient Engagement Studio, University of South Carolina, Greenville, SC, United States
| | - Lorie Donelle
- College of Nursing, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, United States
| | - Phyllis MacGilvray
- School of Medicine Greenville, University of South Carolina, Greenville, SC, United States
- Family Medicine, Prisma Health, Greenville, SC, United States
| | - Nabil Natafgi
- Department of Health Services Policy and Management, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, United States
- Patient Engagement Studio, University of South Carolina, Greenville, SC, United States
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Wittmann D, Mehta A, McCaughan E, Faraday M, Duby A, Matthew A, Incrocci L, Burnett A, Nelson CJ, Elliott S, Koontz BF, Bober SL, McLeod D, Capogrosso P, Yap T, Higano C, Loeb S, Capellari E, Glodé M, Goltz H, Howell D, Kirby M, Bennett N, Trost L, Odiyo Ouma P, Wang R, Salter C, Skolarus TA, McPhail J, McPhail S, Brandon J, Northouse LL, Paich K, Pollack CE, Shifferd J, Erickson K, Mulhall JP. Guidelines for Sexual Health Care for Prostate Cancer Patients: Recommendations of an International Panel. J Sex Med 2022; 19:1655-1669. [PMID: 36192299 DOI: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2022.08.197] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2022] [Revised: 07/18/2022] [Accepted: 08/29/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients with prostate cancer suffer significant sexual dysfunction after treatment which negatively affects them and their partners psychologically, and strain their relationships. AIM We convened an international panel with the aim of developing guidelines that will inform clinicians, patients and partners about the impact of prostate cancer therapies (PCT) on patients' and partners' sexual health, their relationships, and about biopsychosocial rehabilitation in prostate cancer (PC) survivorship. METHODS The guidelines panel included international expert researchers and clinicians, and a guideline methodologist. A systematic review of the literature, using the Ovid MEDLINE, Scopus, CINAHL, PsychINFO, LGBT Life, and Embase databases was conducted (1995-2022) according to the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Study selection was based on Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Each statement was assigned an evidence strength (A-C) and a recommendation level (strong, moderate, conditional) based on benefit/risk assessment, according to the nomenclature of the American Urological Association (AUA). Data synthesis included meta-analyses of studies deemed of sufficient quality (3), using A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR). OUTCOMES Guidelines for sexual health care for patients with prostate cancer were developed, based on available evidence and the expertise of the international panel. RESULTS The guidelines account for patients' cultural, ethnic, and racial diversity. They attend to the unique needs of individuals with diverse sexual orientations and gender identities. The guidelines are based on literature review, a theoretical model of sexual recovery after PCT, and 6 principles that promote clinician-initiated discussion of realistic expectations of sexual outcomes and mitigation of sexual side-effects through biopsychosocial rehabilitation. Forty-seven statements address the psychosexual, relationship, and functional domains in addition to statements on lifestyle modification, assessment, provider education, and systemic challenges to providing sexual health care in PC survivorship. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS The guidelines provide clinicians with a comprehensive approach to sexual health care for patients with prostate cancer. STRENGTHS & LIMITATIONS The strength of the study is the comprehensive evaluation of existing evidence on sexual dysfunction and rehabilitation in prostate cancer that can, along with available expert knowledge, best undergird clinical practice. Limitation is the variation in the evidence supporting interventions and the lack of research on issues facing patients with prostate cancer in low and middle-income countries. CONCLUSION The guidelines document the distressing sexual sequelae of PCT, provide evidence-based recommendations for sexual rehabilitation and outline areas for future research. Wittmann D, Mehta A, McCaughan E, et al. Guidelines for Sexual Health Care for Prostate Cancer Patients: Recommendations of an International Panel. J Sex Med 2022;19:1655-1669.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniela Wittmann
- Department of Urology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
| | - Akanksha Mehta
- Department of Urology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Eilis McCaughan
- In Memoriam, Ulster University School of Nursing, County Londonderry, Colraine, UK
| | | | - Ashley Duby
- Department of Urology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Andrew Matthew
- Adult Psychiatry and Health System, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Luca Incrocci
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Arthur Burnett
- Department of Urology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Christian J Nelson
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Stacy Elliott
- Departments of Psychiatry and Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | | | - Sharon L Bober
- Department of Psychiatry, Dana Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard University, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Deborah McLeod
- School of Nursing, NS Health Authority and Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada
| | - Paolo Capogrosso
- Department of Urology, Ciircolo & Fondazione Macchi Hospital, University of Insubria, Varese, Lombardy, Italy
| | - Tet Yap
- Department of Urology, Guys & St Thomas' Hospital, City of London, London, UK
| | - Celestia Higano
- Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Stacy Loeb
- Department of Urology at NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Emily Capellari
- Taubman Health Sciences Library, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Michael Glodé
- Department of Medical Oncology, University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Heather Goltz
- School of Social Work, University of Houston-Downtown, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Doug Howell
- Patient with Lived Experience, Keaau, HI, USA
| | - Michael Kirby
- Faculty of the Health and Human Sciences, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, Hertfordshire, UK
| | - Nelson Bennett
- Department of Urology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Landon Trost
- Department of Urology, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT, USA; Department of Urology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | | | - Run Wang
- Department of Surgery-Urology, University of Texas McGovern Medical School, Houston, TX, USA; Department of Urology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Carolyn Salter
- Department of Urology, Madigan Army Medical Center, Tacoma, WA, USA
| | - Ted A Skolarus
- Department of Urology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA; VA Health Services Research & Development, VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - John McPhail
- Patient and Partner with Lived Experience, Okemos, MI, USA
| | - Susan McPhail
- Patient and Partner with Lived Experience, Okemos, MI, USA
| | - Jan Brandon
- Partner with Lived Experience, Nashville, TN, USA
| | | | - Kellie Paich
- Clinical Quality and Survivorship, Movember Foundation, Culver City, CA, USA
| | - Craig E Pollack
- Department of Health Policy Management, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Jen Shifferd
- Department of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation Medicine, Michigan Medicine Therapy Services, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Kim Erickson
- Department of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation Medicine, Michigan Medicine Therapy Services, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - John P Mulhall
- Department of Sexual and Reproductive Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Macauda MM, Arent MA, Sakhuja M, Yelton B, Noblet S, Fedrick D, Zona D, New C, Isenhower WD, Wandersman A, Friedman DB. Elements for successful implementation of a clinic-based health literacy intervention. Front Public Health 2022; 10:977765. [PMID: 36388330 PMCID: PMC9650509 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.977765] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/24/2022] [Accepted: 10/07/2022] [Indexed: 01/25/2023] Open
Abstract
Improving health literacy is a national public health priority. Given the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, it is even more critical for health and medical information to be clear and understandable for patients and their families. Clinic-based programs to improve health literacy need to be pragmatic, feasible, and helpful for the implementing clinic and patients. This paper describes the development, implementation, and evaluation of a pragmatic, clinic-based health literacy intervention in a safety-net clinic that serves uninsured and indigent patients. Study methods are guided by a previous pilot study and components recommended for pragmatic interventions. An electronic readiness assessment was distributed to out-patient clinics affiliated with a statewide hospital association. The AskMe3 tool was used for the intervention as it is evidence informed and relatively easy to implement. Implementation included ongoing dialogue between the clinic and the academic research team. Within the implementing clinic, data collected from patients via verbally administered questionnaires was analyzed using descriptive statistics and chi-squares. Interview data collected from the clinic director was analyzed qualitatively for themes. The implementing clinic had some of the lowest average scores of the 34 clinics who participated in the initial readiness assessment. Despite this, they were able to successfully implement the health literacy intervention during a global pandemic. Eighty-eight participants completed patient questionnaires at this clinic. Most patients (96%) agreed the AskMe3 questions helped them talk with the doctor or nurse at their current appointment. Most (99%) also perceived the AskMe3 tool to be very helpful when used in a clinical setting. The clinic director offered that the staff initially thought the intervention would be difficult to implement. However, implementation by clinic volunteers with encouragement and prioritization of health literacy by the clinic director contributed to success. When considering interventions for clinical settings, a pragmatic approach can help with selection and implementation of a program that fits with the realities on the ground. Further, frequent technical assistance can help resolve implementation barriers. Interventions utilizing tools such as AskMe3, because of their simplicity, allow creative solutions to capacity issues for clinics who see a need for health literacy improvements.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark M. Macauda
- Department of Health Promotion, Education, and Behavior, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, United States,Center for Applied Research and Evaluation, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, United States,*Correspondence: Mark M. Macauda
| | - Michelle A. Arent
- Department of Health Promotion, Education, and Behavior, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, United States
| | - Mayank Sakhuja
- Department of Health Promotion, Education, and Behavior, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, United States
| | - Brooks Yelton
- Department of Health Promotion, Education, and Behavior, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, United States
| | - Samuel Noblet
- Department of Health Promotion, Education, and Behavior, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, United States,Prevention Research Center, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, United States
| | | | - Diana Zona
- South Carolina Hospital Association, Columbia, SC, United States
| | - Cyndi New
- South Carolina Hospital Association, Columbia, SC, United States
| | | | | | - Daniela B. Friedman
- Department of Health Promotion, Education, and Behavior, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, United States
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Haynes D, Hughes KD, Okafor A. PEARL: A Guide for Developing Community-Engaging and Culturally-Sensitive Education Materials. J Immigr Minor Health 2022; 25:666-673. [PMID: 36266493 PMCID: PMC9584241 DOI: 10.1007/s10903-022-01418-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/07/2022] [Indexed: 12/02/2022]
Abstract
Community outreach and engagement has been a regular activity of the National Cancer Institute at its designated Cancer Centers. However, in 2016, community outreach and engagement became a required activity for all cancer centers. Yet there is a gap in the literature that provides guidelines for developing materials that resonate with communities. We developed the PEARL rubric to fulfill that gap from our work developing culturally sensitive breast cancer education materials for African American and Immigrant African women. We conducted a targeted literature review to understand the approaches that have been used for developing education materials for communities. We reviewed the literature and distilled key elements into our PEARL guide for creating culturally appropriate education materials. PEARL consists of five elements: Plain language and understandability, Explicit data, statistics, and graphs, Affirmative framing, Representative content, and Local connection. PEARL is a modern comprehensive guide that researchers can use for creating culturally sensitive materials. It is designed to guide researchers develop educational materials who have little to no experience in community engagement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Haynes
- Institute for Health Informatics, University of Minnesota, Suite 8-100, 516 Delaware Street SE, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA
| | - Kelly D. Hughes
- Minnesota Department of Health, Sage Program, 85 7Th Place E, St. Paul, MN 55101 USA
| | - Annette Okafor
- College of Letters and Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 1055 Bascom Mall, Madison, WI 53706 USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Friedman DB. In the Words of My Mother: "I'm fighting hard for me but mostly for you". JOURNAL OF CANCER EDUCATION : THE OFFICIAL JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR CANCER EDUCATION 2022; 37:1261-1263. [PMID: 35488086 PMCID: PMC9054500 DOI: 10.1007/s13187-022-02175-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/24/2022] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
I have always been interested in health information-what it is, where people get it, how they interpret it, talk about it with others, and use it-if at all. It has been overwhelming to stay abreast of the evolving science during the COVID-19 global pandemic when it is often quite complicated in nature and when we are exposed to individuals' and group's spreading of misinformation and disinformation. During this pandemic, I have been reflecting a lot on my childhood during which my mother was suffering with cancer and frustrated and confused about the information she received regarding her diagnosis and treatment plan. This is not the kind of journal article I am used to writing and these are probably the most difficult few pages I have ever drafted. My observations during COVID-19 led me to want to share the aspects of my mother's situation that motivate me and guide my work in cancer education with a focus on health literacy and communication. This piece describes my mother's experiences with illness and medical information in her own words. It is brief and personal and reminds me clearly why I chose this field and why it is important now more than ever for cancer educators to focus our efforts on communication.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniela B Friedman
- Department of Health Promotion, Education, and Behavior and Office for the Study of Aging, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, 915 Greene Street, Columbia, SC, 29208, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Troy C, Brunson A, Goldsmith A, Noblet S, Steck SE, Hebert JR, Payne J, McCormick D, Friedman DB. Implementing Community-Based Prostate Cancer Education in Rural South Carolina: a Collaborative Approach Through a Statewide Cancer Alliance. JOURNAL OF CANCER EDUCATION : THE OFFICIAL JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR CANCER EDUCATION 2022; 37:163-168. [PMID: 32564252 PMCID: PMC7749809 DOI: 10.1007/s13187-020-01800-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/02/2023]
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of implementing community-based prostate health education programs in rural communities. Prostate cancer (PrCA) remains one of the most common cancers among men, and a growing body of literature demonstrates that large interracial differences in PrCA incidence and mortality rates consistently disfavor African Americans in comparison to European Americans. It also is evident, despite the overall decrease in cancer death rates in the USA in recent decades, rural areas are experiencing a reduction in death rates much more slowly. In this study, education session content focused on PrCA risk factors, symptoms, screening, healthy diet and exercise, treatment options, and provider communication strategies. Forty individuals participated and completed pre/post-education program surveys to assess changes in PrCA knowledge and cancer decision-making. Participants showed improvements in education and awareness following the session, and overall impressions of the program were consistently positive as exhibited by participants' answers on a satisfaction survey. The findings demonstrate the real need both in terms of research to understand the underlying problem and to provide practical solutions that can be implemented to reverse the current situation. The results obtained support community-based education programs as an effective means of delivering PrCA prevention, screening, and treatment information to rural communities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Catherine Troy
- College of Arts and Sciences, University of South Carolina, 1521 Greene Street, Columbia, SC, 29208, USA
- South Carolina Honors College, University of South Carolina, 1215 Blossom Street, Columbia, SC, 29208, USA
- Department of Health Promotion, Education, and Behavior, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, 915 Greene Street, Columbia, SC, 29208, USA
| | - Ashley Brunson
- College of Arts and Sciences, University of South Carolina, 1521 Greene Street, Columbia, SC, 29208, USA
- Department of Health Promotion, Education, and Behavior, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, 915 Greene Street, Columbia, SC, 29208, USA
| | - Andrew Goldsmith
- South Carolina Honors College, University of South Carolina, 1215 Blossom Street, Columbia, SC, 29208, USA
- Department of Health Promotion, Education, and Behavior, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, 915 Greene Street, Columbia, SC, 29208, USA
| | - Samuel Noblet
- Department of Health Promotion, Education, and Behavior, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, 915 Greene Street, Columbia, SC, 29208, USA
- Statewide Cancer Prevention and Control Program, University of South Carolina, 915 Greene Street, Columbia, SC, 29208, USA
| | - Susan E Steck
- Statewide Cancer Prevention and Control Program, University of South Carolina, 915 Greene Street, Columbia, SC, 29208, USA
- Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, 915 Greene Street, Columbia, SC, 29208, USA
| | - James R Hebert
- Statewide Cancer Prevention and Control Program, University of South Carolina, 915 Greene Street, Columbia, SC, 29208, USA
- Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, 915 Greene Street, Columbia, SC, 29208, USA
| | - Johnny Payne
- Upstate Prostate Cancer Alliance, 412 Perry Hill Road, Easley, SC, 29640, USA
| | - Doug McCormick
- AID Upstate, 811 Pendleton Street, Suite 10, Greenville, SC, 29601, USA
| | - Daniela B Friedman
- Department of Health Promotion, Education, and Behavior, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, 915 Greene Street, Columbia, SC, 29208, USA.
- Statewide Cancer Prevention and Control Program, University of South Carolina, 915 Greene Street, Columbia, SC, 29208, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Friedman DB, Arent MA, Yelton B, Sakhuja M, Haynes VE, Noblet S, Brandt HM, Isenhower WD, Wandersman A, Zona D, New C, Fedrick D, Scaccia J, Bruner L. Development of a Clinical-Academic-Community Collaboration to Improve Health Literacy. J Prim Care Community Health 2021; 11:2150132720957440. [PMID: 32909496 PMCID: PMC7495516 DOI: 10.1177/2150132720957440] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Limited health literacy is associated with poor patient health outcomes and
increased hospitalization rates. Patient-provider communication plays an
important role in patient health literacy and the understanding of medical
terminology. This study demonstrates how a collaboration between clinical,
academic, and community partners was instrumental in the design and
implementation of a clinic readiness assessment and a clinic-based pilot
intervention to encourage patient-provider communication and improve patient
health literacy. A state hospital association, academic research team, and
community adult literacy center director collaborated to develop a 60-item
clinic readiness assessment and an evidence-informed pilot intervention. The
clinic readiness assessment captured clinics’ motivation and capacity for pilot
implementation and providers’ current communication strategies. The intervention
centered around AskMe3™ educational materials and involved 2 patient visits
(initial and follow-up visits). Data collection instruments for the intervention
were administered verbally and included questions about patient demographics and
communication needs, and a single-item health literacy measure. Descriptive
statistics (frequencies/percentages) were used to analyze results from the
clinic readiness assessment and pilot intervention. Establishment of the
partnership, and collaborative, iterative development of the clinic readiness
assessment and pilot intervention are described. This pilot project resulted in
important lessons learned which led to critical modifications that will inform
future expansion of the intervention. Collaboration between healthcare leaders,
researchers, and community partners is recommended for developing clinic-based
health literacy initiatives.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Diana Zona
- South Carolina Hospital Association, Columbia, SC, USA
| | - Cyndi New
- South Carolina Hospital Association, Columbia, SC, USA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Joyce DD, Heslop DL, Umoh JI, Brown SD, Robles JA, Wallston KA, Moses KA. Examining the association of health literacy and numeracy with prostate-related knowledge and prostate cancer treatment regret. Urol Oncol 2020; 38:682.e11-682.e19. [PMID: 32448502 PMCID: PMC10129910 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2020.04.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2019] [Revised: 03/31/2020] [Accepted: 04/07/2020] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Educational materials used in prostate cancer shared decision-making are often written above the health literacy levels of the patients that may benefit the most from such tools. Poor understanding the oncologic and functional outcomes of prostate cancer treatment may influence patient regret during this process. In this study, we assess the association between health literacy, numeracy, prostate-related knowledge and treatment regret in a diverse population. MATERIALS AND METHODS Patients obtaining care between June and August of 2016 at both community-based and academic tertiary care facilities were assessed for health literacy and numeracy using validated instruments. Prostate knowledge was tested in those patients without a history of prostate cancer using a 29-item questionnaire and patient-level predictors of knowledge were assessed. Prostate cancer treatment regret was assessed in those patients who had a history of prostate cancer. RESULTS A total of 90 patients were enrolled, 38 (42%) of whom had a history of prostate cancer. African American race (I = 0.039), financial strain (P < 0.001), and educational attainment (P < 0.001) were all associated with lower health literacy on multivariable analysis. Possessing a professional degree (P = 0.021) and higher health literacy (P = 0.001) were associated with greater prostate-related knowledge. Of those with a history of prostate cancer, 9 (24%) expressed treatment regret. Patients with regret were more likely to be African American (n = 6, 66.7% vs. 5, 17.2%, P = 0.004), not married (P = 0.016), and score lower on the literacy (1.0 vs. 8.0, P = 0.009) and numeracy (10.0 vs. 16.0, P = 0.016) scales. CONCLUSIONS We identified lower health literacy among African American men, and lower prostate-related knowledge in those with poor health literacy. To our knowledge, this is the first study to show an association between health literacy and prostate cancer treatment regret.
Collapse
|
9
|
Owens OL, Smith KN, Beer JM, Gallerani DG, McDonnell KK. A Qualitative Cultural Sensitivity Assessment of the Breathe Easier Mobile Application for Lung Cancer Survivors and Their Families. Oncol Nurs Forum 2020; 47:331-341. [PMID: 32301935 DOI: 10.1188/20.onf.331-341] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate the cultural sensitivity of the Breathe Easier mobile health application for African American lung cancer survivors and their families. Breathe Easier is an intervention designed to teach strategies to combat symptoms related to lung cancer. PARTICIPANTS & SETTING 12 African American lung cancer survivors and their family members were recruited from an American College of Surgeons-approved cancer program in South Carolina. METHODOLOGIC APPROACH Participants completed in-depth interviews, which were guided by the Cultural Sensitivity Assessment Tool and the Cultural Sensitivity Checklist. Two researchers performed open and axial coding to conceptually organize the data. FINDINGS Multiple culturally relevant themes emerged, including benefits, concerns, and suggestions related to content literacy and inclusiveness, as well as acceptability of and motivations for using the mobile application. However, lung cancer survivors and their family members reported being more concerned about accessing accurate survivorship information. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING Attention to health literacy, eHealth literacy, and cultural sensitivity may enhance patient outcomes, and nurses can advocate for patients regarding these communication issues.
Collapse
|
10
|
Hoang DV, Shivappa N, Pham NM, Hebert JR, Binns CW, Lee AH. Dietary inflammatory index is associated with increased risk for prostate cancer among Vietnamese men. Nutrition 2019; 62:140-145. [PMID: 30889455 DOI: 10.1016/j.nut.2018.12.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2018] [Revised: 11/26/2018] [Accepted: 12/29/2018] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Inflammatory potential of diet, as measured by the dietary inflammatory index (DII), has consistently been associated with an increased risk for prostate cancer (PCa). However, data has largely been reported in populations with more proinflammatory dietary patterns, whereas there is high diversity in dietary pattern worldwide. The aim of this study was to assess the association between DII scores and the risk for PCa in Vietnam. METHODS A case-control study of 652 participants (244 incident PCa patients, 64-75 y of age, and 408 controls, frequency matched for age) was conducted in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam, from 2013 to 2015. Habitual diet was ascertained using a validated food frequency questionnaire (FFQ), whereas other factors, including demographic and lifestyle characteristics, were assessed via face-to-face interviews. The daily intake of pro- and anti-inflammatory nutrients for each participant was calculated from the FFQ and used to estimate individuals' energy-adjusted DII (E-DII) scores. Multivariate-adjusted odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated using unconditional logistic regression models. RESULTS Comparing the middle and highest versus lowest tertile of DII scores, there was an increased risk for overall PCa. The OR and associated 95% CI was 2.63 (1.61-4.37) and 3.35 (2.06-5.53), respectively (Ptrend < 0.01). Similar results were found for low-moderate and high-grade PCa. The respective ORs (95% CI) were 3.34 (1.66-7.13) and 5.29 (2.69-11.18), Ptrend < 0.001, and 2.51 (1.40-4.63) and 2.57 (1.43-4.73), Ptrend 0.006. CONCLUSION A proinflammatory diet was associated with increased risk for PCa among Vietnamese men.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dong Van Hoang
- National Institute of Hygiene and Epidemiology, Hanoi, Vietnam; Vietnam National Cancer Institute, Vietnam National Cancer Hospital, 30 Cau Buou, Hanoi, Vietnam.
| | - Nitin Shivappa
- The Cancer Prevention and Control Program, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina, USA
| | - Ngoc Minh Pham
- Curtin University, Kent Street, Bentley, Perth, Western Australia 6102, Western Australia; Thai Nguyen University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Thai Nguyen, Vietnam
| | - James R Hebert
- The Cancer Prevention and Control Program, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina, USA
| | - Colin W Binns
- Curtin University, Kent Street, Bentley, Perth, Western Australia 6102, Western Australia
| | - Andy H Lee
- Curtin University, Kent Street, Bentley, Perth, Western Australia 6102, Western Australia
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Owens OL, Beer JM, Reyes LI, Thomas TL. Systematic Review of Commercially Available Mobile Phone Applications for Prostate Cancer Education. Am J Mens Health 2019; 13:1557988318816912. [PMID: 30526243 PMCID: PMC6775560 DOI: 10.1177/1557988318816912] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2018] [Revised: 11/01/2018] [Accepted: 11/12/2018] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Prostate cancer is the most commonly diagnosed non-skin cancer among all men and the second most common cause of death. To ameliorate the burden of prostate cancer, there is a critical need to identify strategies for providing men with information about prostate cancer screening and the importance of informed decision making. With mobile phones becoming more ubiquitous, many individuals are adopting their phones as sources for health information. The objective of this systematic review is to identify and evaluate commercially available apps for promoting informed prostate cancer screening decisions. Two keywords "prostate cancer screening" and "prostate cancer" were entered into the search engines of Google and iOS app stores in May 2017. Evaluations were conducted on apps' (a) quality, (b) grade-level readability, (c) cultural sensitivity, and (d) usability heuristics. None of the 14 apps meeting the inclusion criteria contained the full breadth of information covered in the 2016 American Cancer Society's Prostate Cancer Prevention and Early Detection Guidelines, but over half were inclusive of topics consistent with these guidelines. Most apps' readability was higher than an eighth-grade reading level. Most apps were also not framed and had a neutral tone. Only four apps met most criteria for being culturally sensitive to African Americans. Usability among apps was variable, but some contained major usability concerns. Recommendations for improving educational apps for prostate cancer screening include: disseminating evidence-based information; using culturally sensitive language; knowing the implications of the one and framing of content; making apps interactive; and following common usability principles.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Otis L. Owens
- College of Social Work, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA
| | - Jenay M. Beer
- College of Public Health, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA
| | - Ligia I. Reyes
- Department of Health Promotion Education and Behavior, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA
| | - Tracey L. Thomas
- Health Sciences Department, Health and Behavioral Studies College, James Madison University, Harrisonburg, VA, USA
| |
Collapse
|