Mallet Fractures of the Thumb Compared With Mallet Fractures of the Fingers

Phalangeal Fractures Requiring Vascular Reconstruction: Epidemiology and Factors Predictive of Reoperation

BACKGROUND

Demographic information related to phalangeal fractures that undergo simultaneous vascular repair, as well as their complication and reoperation profiles, remain incompletely understood. This study aimed to examine the patient and fracture characteristics influencing the outcomes after these injuries in a large Unites States adult patient cohort and to identify risk factors associated with unplanned reoperation of these fractures.

METHODS

A retrospective study was performed, identifying 54 phalangeal fractures in 48 patients; all fractures were also associated with vascular injuries requiring repair. Patients with digital amputations were excluded. A manual chart review was performed to collect epidemiologic, radiographic, and surgical outcome information.

RESULTS

The incidence of phalangeal fractures undergoing vascular repair was higher in the non-dominant hand, middle finger, proximal phalanx, and phalangeal shaft. Most (52.9%) fractures were due to occupational injury, with the most common mechanism being sharp injuries. More than half of the fractures had a nerve injury, and 13% required a vein graft for vascular repair. More than half of the fractures required at least one reoperation, most commonly due to "stiffness/tendon adhesion" (50%) and "nonunion or delayed union" (21.4%). In multivariable analysis, thumb (odds ratio [OR]: 35.1, P = .043) and index (OR: 14.0, P = .048) fingers' fractures were found to be independently associated with unplanned reoperation.

CONCLUSIONS

Phalangeal fractures requiring vascular repair occurred most often in the occupational setting and more than 50% required at least one unplanned reoperation. Injuries sustained in the thumb and index finger were more likely to undergo unplanned reoperation, which may guide initial treatment decision-making and postoperative follow-up.

Reoperation After Operative Treatment of Open Finger Fractures

BACKGROUND

Our primary aim was to develop a prediction model for return to the operating room (OR) after open finger fractures by studying the reoperation rate of open finger fractures based on patient demographics, injury mechanism, injury severity, and type of initial surgical fixation. The secondary aim was to study the predictors for secondary surgery due to nonunion, postoperative infection, and secondary amputation.

METHODS

In the retrospective chart review, 1321 open finger fractures of 907 patients were included. Demographic-, injury-, and treatment-related factors were gathered from medical records.

RESULTS

We found that open fractures involving the thumb had lower odds of undergoing secondary surgery. Crush injury, proximal phalangeal fracture, arterial injury, other injured fingers, and other injuries to the ipsilateral hand were associated with higher odds of undergoing secondary surgery. However, the associated factors we identified were not powerful enough to create a predictive model. Other injury to the ipsilateral hand, vein repair, and external fixator as initial treatment were associated with postoperative nonunion. Crush injury and proximal phalangeal fracture were associated with postoperative infection. No factors were associated with secondary amputation.

CONCLUSIONS

A quarter of open finger fractures will likely need more than one surgical procedure, especially in more severely injured fingers, due to crush or with vascular impairment. Furthermore, fractures involving the thumb have less reoperation, while fractures involving the proximal phalanx have poorest outcomes.

Epidemiology and Fracture Patterns of Traumatic Phalangeal Fractures

Background:

Despite the relatively high incidence of phalangeal fractures, there is an imperfect understanding of the epidemiology and anatomical distribution of these fractures. This study describes the patient characteristics, anatomic distribution, and detailed fracture patterns of phalangeal fractures among a large adult cohort in the United States.

Methods:

A retrospective study was performed among patients with phalangeal fractures in the United States between January 2010 and January 2015. Included patients were 18 years old or older and had a diagnosis of a phalangeal fracture. A total of 2140 phalangeal fractures in 1747 patients were included, and a manual chart review was performed to collect epidemiological and radiographic information. Fractures were classified based on location and fracture pattern.

Results:

The median age at the time of injury was 45 years (interquartile range, 30–57), and 65% of patients were men. The small finger had the highest incidence of fractures (26%) followed by the ring finger (24%). Distal and proximal phalanges demonstrated the highest incidence of fractures at 39% each. The dominant hand was affected in 44% of cases. Eighteen percent of fractures were due to a work-related trauma mechanism, and the most common mechanism of injury was blunt trauma (46%).

Conclusion:

This study provides a detailed overview of the anatomic distribution and fracture patterns of phalangeal fractures in an adult US population and, thus, may aid hand surgeons treating these injuries.

Mallet Finger: Two Different Injuries

Mallet injuries, either tendinous or bony, are common. They are often studied together and typically treated in the same way with extension splintage for 6 to 8 weeks. Yet the evidence clearly shows there are different injuries that present in the same way. Tendinous mallet injuries present in older patients usually following a low energy injury; they are often painless. The commonly injured fingers are the middle and ring. The injuries are almost always single digit without concomitant injuries. There is an extensor lag of a mean of 31⁰ (range 3°-59⁰) in the patients treated in my unit. In contrast, bony mallet injuries occur at a younger age (mean 40 years) and are always due to high energy injuries. The injuries are always painful. The commonly injured fingers are the ring and little fingers. There are multiple injuries in 3% (range 2%-5%) and in 4% to 8% of cases, there are concomitant (nondigital) injuries according to data in my unit. Radiologically there is an appreciably smaller extensor lag; mean 13⁰ (range 0°-40⁰). In particular, bony mallet injuries are extension compression, not avulsion, fractures which should not logically be treated with an extension splint which will reproduce the direction of injury.

Treatment Strategies for Acute Seymour Fractures in Children and Adolescents: Including Crushed Open Fractures

PURPOSE

We aimed to suggest treatment strategies for Seymour fractures (SFs) with varying clinical manifestations, based on the retrospective outcomes of patients seen at our institute.

METHODS

Between March 2000 and December 2019, a total of 26 SF patients were categorized into 3 groups: acute typical SF (category 1; open fracture/exposed germinal matrix and physis), acute injuries but delayed presentation (category 2; presented to our institute more than 24 hours after the injury with misdiagnosis as simple nail injuries), and direct crush injuries (category 3; the most severe injury type, characterized by nail loss, nail bed lacerations, or maceration of the germinal matrix). In category 1, reduction was maintained using K-wire fixation without nail plate sutures. In 2, massive irrigation/debridement was followed by reduction and nail plate suturing without K-wire fixation. Finally, in 3, nail bed repair, reinsertion of the extracted nail plate after creating a penetration hole for drainage, K-wire fixation, and nail plate suturing were sequentially performed.

RESULTS

The mean age of the patients was 8.92 years. At the final follow-up, the mean dorsal angulation was 1.73 degrees, and the length ratio was 97.88%; no significant differences were observed compared with the contralateral normal side (P = 0.498 and P = 0.341, respectively). The final visual analog scale pain score; the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand score; and the active range of motion ratio were 0.50, 1.52, and 96.92%, respectively. There were no significant complications requiring revision surgery. Although the overall outcomes were satisfactory, category 3 patients had slightly worse visual analog scale pain scores; Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand scores; and range of motion compared with those in the other categories (P = 0.003, P = 0.002, and P < 0.001, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Satisfactory clinical outcomes were obtained by applying different surgical treatments to the different SF categories. We have suggested appropriate treatment strategies for acute SF varying in severity.

Dorsal Subluxation of the Proximal Interphalangeal Joint After Volar Base Fracture of the Middle Phalanx

Background: Treatment decisions regarding volar base fractures of the middle phalanx depend on whether the proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joint is reduced. Our aim was to study the agreement among hand surgeons in determining whether the PIP joint fractures are subluxated and to study the factors associated with subluxation of these fractures. Methods: In this retrospective chart review, 413 volar base fractures of the middle phalanx were included. Demographic and injury-related factors were gathered from medical records and radiographs. Using a Web-based survey, interobserver agreement was determined among 105 hand surgeons on the assessment of PIP joint subluxation of a series of 26 cases. Using the cohort of 413 fractures, a threshold for percent articular involvement and relative fracture displacement that corresponds with subluxation of the PIP joint was analyzed. Results: We found moderate to substantial agreement between hand surgeons on subluxation (κ = 0.59, P < .0001) and an overall percent agreement of 85%. Percent articular involvement and relative fracture displacement were independently associated with subluxation of the PIP joint (P < .001). Percent articular involvement of 35% had a specificity of 90% and a negative predicting value (NPV) of 92% for joint subluxation. Relative fracture displacement of 35% had a specificity of 92% and an NPV of 94% for joint subluxation. Conclusions: Surgeons generally agree on whether a PIP joint is subluxated. Percent articular involvement and relative fragment displacement are objective measurements that can help characterize joint stability and assist with decision-making.

Surgical treatment of the bony mallet thumb: a case series and literature review

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this study was to provide a more precise statement on the outcome after surgical treatment of a bony mallet thumb and possibly give a treatment recommendation regarding the surgical fixation method.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

All patients (n = 16) who underwent a surgical treatment for an acute bony mallet thumb fracture between January 2006 and July 2019 were enrolled. The surgical method, complications, the range of motion, tip pinch, lateral key pinch, overall grip strength, visual analog score, Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand Score, Mayo Wrist Score, Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation Score, Buck-Gramcko Score and radiologic parameters were evaluated. Further, a comprehensive literature search on PubMed was conducted covering a period from 1956 to 2021 to include all possible matching articles on the treatment of the bony mallet thumb (n = 21 articles).

RESULTS

Surgical treatment was very inhomogenous including indirect and direct K-wire fixation, screw fixation, plate fixation and anchor fixation methods. The IP joint range of motion and thumb strength ranged from 66 to 94% in comparison to the contralateral side. An open reduction led to worse functional scores compared to a closed reduction. Treatment methods in the literature were also very inhomogenous with a very low patient count, often even pooling data of bony mallet thumb fractures with bony mallet finger fractures. The risk for infection was higher in K-wire fixation methods than in open reduction and internal fixation methods.

CONCLUSION

The evidence for the best treatment of a bony mallet thumb fracture is low. On one hand the functional outcome can be inferior using an open reduction approach, but on the other hand, K-wire fixation methods with a closed reduction approach showed a higher risk for infection. Future multi-center research must be conducted to find the best treatment procedure for the best outcome of the patient.

Management for Bony Mallet Thumb with a Single Extension Blocking Kirschner Wire

Introduction

Mallet finger injury is defined by disruption of the terminal extensor tendon distal-to-distal interphalangeal (DIP) joint. While in the fingers, it is a relatively common injury, it is a rarely encountered entity when involving the thumb. Various conservative and operative treatment strategies have been reported for the management of mallet thumb with no consensus by clinicians.

Case Report

We present the case of a 27-year-old right hand dominant man with a left bony mallet thumb injury that occurred while playing hurling. Hurling is traditional Irish sport that is one of the fastest field games in the world, involving the use of a wooden Hurley and ball. Clinically, there was loss of active extension at the DIP joint of the non-dominant thumb with radiographs revealing an avulsion fracture involving more than one-third of the articular surface at the base of the distal phalanx. Closed reduction and percutaneous fixation using a single extension block Kirschner wire was performed without a transfixion wire across the DIP joint. Four months postoperatively, the patient had regained that good functional dexterity was able to return to playing hurling.

Conclusion

A single K-wire technique may be beneficial with theoretical reduction of chance of iatrogenic nail bed, bone fragment rotation, chondral damage, and bone injury. To the best of our knowledge, no previous reports of its application to bony mallet thumb have been described.

Pathologic Fractures in Benign Neoplasms of the Fingers

Background: To describe the rate and predictors of pathologic fractures in benign neoplasms of the finger, as variables from prediction models for pathologic fractures of the long bones of the extremities are not necessarily applicable to the bones of the hand. Methods: In this retrospective chart review, 69 histologically confirmed neoplasms affecting the bones of the fingers, 49 phalanges and 20 metacarpals, were identified in patients presenting at 2 urban hospitals over a 24-year period. Different variables were studied as possible predictors of pathologic fractures. Results: Forty-nine percent of the tumors presented as a pathologic fracture. The small finger was independently associated with pathologic fractures compared to the other fingers. Tumors of the metacarpal bones were the least likely to fracture compared to other bones. Conclusions: Almost half of neoplasms affecting the bones of the fingers presented initially with a pathologic fracture, most commonly the small finger. Therefore, a lower threshold for surgical treatment of a bone neoplasm affecting the small finger may be reasonable.

A Bony Mallet Thumb with Interposition of the Nail Plate

Thumb extensor injuries and bony avulsion in the distal phalanx of the thumb are rare compared with other fingers. The most reported complications are infection, nail deformity, joint incongruity, implant failure, recurrent flexion deformity, and residual pain. This report presents a case of 30-year-old man suffering from an injury in the left thumb distal phalanx with a displaced comminuted intra-articular fracture of the distal phalanx of the left thumb. The nail plate was interposed between the dorsal and palmar fragments. The interposition of the nail plate in the bony mallet thumb has not been described before. Surgical treatment and fixation with a 2-mm miniscrew resulted in successful treatment. Clinical suspicion of this complication is of great importance and can affect treatment outcomes.