Flow redirection endoluminal device (FRED) for treatment of intracranial aneurysms: A systematic review

Performance assessment of the Surpass Evolve flow diverter for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The Surpass Evolve (SE) has emerged as a promising alternative treatment from the flow diverter series. The utilization of the SE has gradually increased, however, there is a scarcity of comprehensive data on the solidity of this technology in the endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms (IAs). This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the SE flow diverter.

METHODS

A systematic literature search from inception to April 2024 was conducted across five databases for studies involving IAs treated with the SE. The primary effectiveness outcome was the proportion of complete aneurysm occlusion at the final follow-up, and the primary safety outcome comprised a composite of early and delayed complications. Subgroup analyses based on aneurysm size, anatomical location, and rupture status were also conducted.

RESULTS

Our analysis included nine studies with 645 patients and 722 IAs. Effectiveness outcomes revealed an overall complete aneurysm occlusion rate of 69% (95% confidence interval (CI) = 58%-78%; I2 = 72%) and a favorable aneurysm occlusion rate of 91% (95% CI = 82%-96%; I2 = 49%). Safety outcomes demonstrated an overall complications rate of 6% (95% CI = 3%-12%; I2 = 66%), with an early complications rate of 6% (95% CI = 4%-11%; I2 = 0%), and a delayed complications rate of 0% (95% CI = 0%-7%; I2 = 0%).

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest a favorable outcome with a high rate of complete aneurysm occlusion at the last follow-up, with acceptable rates of neurological complications. Future research efforts should focus on larger, prospective studies with standardized outcome measures to further elucidate the clinical utility of the SE flow diverter in the management of IAs.

Pipeline Embolization Device and Flow Re-Direction Endoluminal Device for Intracranial Aneurysms: A Comparative Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Study

BACKGROUND

When it comes to intracranial aneurysms, the quest for more effective treatments is ongoing. Flow diversion represents a growing advancement in this field. This review seeks to compare 2 variants of the endovascular flow diversion method: the Flow Re-Direction Endoluminal Device (FRED) and the Pipeline Embolization Device (PED).

METHODS

A systematic review was conducted according to the PRISMA guideline using PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Embase, using appropriate terms to compare PED and FRED in double-arm studies from conception until October 8th, 2023.

RESULTS

The meta-analysis encompassed 1769 patients, with a predominance of females (75.5%), among whom 973 patients underwent FRED procedures, while 651 received PED interventions. At 6 months, complete occlusion rates were 0.62 for FRED and 0.68 for PED (P = 0.68). At 1 year and the last follow-up, no significant differences were observed between FRED and PED, respectively. Adequate occlusion rates were similar between FRED and PED (0.82 vs. 0.79, P = 0.68). FRED showed a statistically significant higher rate of good mRS scores at follow-up (1.00 vs. 0.97, P = 0.03). Hemorrhage and re-treatment rates were higher in PED (P < 0.01) without considering the rupture status of the aneurysms due to the lack of data.

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis suggests comparable efficacy but different safety profiles between FRED and PED in treating intracranial aneurysms. FRED demonstrated a higher rate of good modified Rankin scores, while PED showed increased hemorrhage and re-treatment rates. Understanding these differences is crucial for informed decision-making in clinical practice.

Predicting the O'Kelly-Marotta scale score after flow-diverter stent placement using silent MRA

PURPOSE

Flow-diverter (FD) stents were developed to treat aneurysms that are difficult to treat with conventional coiling or surgery. This study aimed to compare usefulness of Silent MRA and TOF (time of flight) -MRA in patients with aneurysms after FD placement.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively collected images from 22 patients with 23 internal carotid artery aneurysms treated with FD. Two radiologists conducted MRA and DSA experiments. In the first reading experiment, the radiologists evaluated the aneurysm filling by employing Silent MRA and TOF-MRA and utilizing the modified O'Kelly-Marotta (OKM) scale, a four-class classification system for aneurysms after FD placement. We then calculated the agreement between the modified OKM scale on MRA and the original OKM scale on DSA. In the second reading experiment, the radiologists rated blood flow within the FD using a five-point scale.

RESULTS

The weighted kappa value of the OKM scale between DSA and TOF-MRA was 0.436 (moderate agreement), and that between DSA and Silent MRA was 0.943 (almost perfect agreement). The accuracies for the four-class classification were 0.435 and 0.870 for TOF-MRA and Silent MRA, respectively. The mean score of blood flow within FD for TOF-MRA was 2.43 ± 0.90 and that for Silent MRA was 3.04 ± 1.02 (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Silent MRA showed a higher degree of agreement than TOF-MRA in aneurysm filling with DSA. In addition, Silent MRA was significantly superior to TOF-MRA in depicting blood flow within the FD. Therefore, Silent MRA is clinically useful for the follow-up of patients after FD placement.

Safety and efficacy of flow redirection endoluminal device (FRED) for treatment of intracranial aneurysm; A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Previous research has shown promising results for treating intracranial aneurysms (IAs) with a flow redirection endoluminal device (FRED). In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of this device by providing pooled estimates using the data from previous studies.

METHODS

A systematic literature search of Web of Sciences, PubMed, Scopus, and Embase was performed until October 8th, 2023. After selecting the final articles, relevant data were extracted. Parameters relating to safety and efficacy were pooled using STATA software. Heterogeneity was assessed using I-squared and Cochran's Q. Funnel plots and Egger's regression methods were used to evaluate publication bias. Sensitivity analysis was also performed using the leave-one-out method.

RESULTS

The data of 37 studies were used for meta-analysis. The rates of immediate adequate occlusion and complete occlusion were 0.51 (95% CI: 0.31-0.71) and 0.34 (95% CI: 0.16-0.53), respectively, while the rates of the adequate and complete occlusion at the latest follow-up were 0.90 (95% CI: 0.84-0.94) and 0.75 (95% CI: 0.65-0.84), respectively. The periprocedural complications rate was 0.04 (95% CI: 0.03-0.06), and the overall complications rate was 0.12 (95% CI: 0.09-0.15). The rate of good functional outcome was 0.99 (95% CI: 0.99-1.00) and the successful implantation rate was 1.00 (95% CI: 1.00-1.00). There was substantial heterogeneity among the reports for most of the evaluated parameters.

CONCLUSION

FRED had high safety and efficacy in treating IAs, as evidenced by its high occlusion and low complication rates.

Pipeline Vantage Embolization Device for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms: A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

The Pipeline Vantage Embolization Device (PVED) is a novel coated flow diverter with reduced wire diameters to improve neoendothelialization and stent porosity. This systematic review evaluates the safety and efficacy of the PVED based on the current literature.

METHODS

Following the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, a thorough literature search was conducted using PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane. The random effects model was used to calculate estimates with major neurological complications within 30 days of treatment as the primary safety endpoint and ≤1-year complete occlusion rate as the primary efficacy endpoint.

RESULTS

Six single-arm studies (5 retrospective, 1 prospective) with 392 patients and 439 aneurysms (6.8% ruptured) were included. Antiplatelet regimens varied, but dual antiplatelet therapy was administered in the majority. The pooled technical success rate was 99.0% (95%CI, 98.0%-100%) with an average of 1.2 devices implanted per procedure. Balloon angioplasty was performed in 17.0% (95%CI, 6.4-27.6%) and adjunctive coiling in 28.0% (95%CI, 17.8-38.2%), with significant heterogeneity for both variables. Pooled estimates for major neurological complications were 3.5% (95%CI, 1.7%-5.2%) with total ischemic events in 4.1% (95% CI, 1.6%-6.6%) and hemorrhagic events in 1.0% (95% CI, 0.0%-1.9%). The rate of complete angiographic occlusion was 75.7% (95%CI, 70.7%-80.6%) at a mean follow-up of 7 months, with in-stent stenoses in 8.1% (95%CI, 4.5%-11.8%).

CONCLUSIONS

The safety and efficacy profile of the PVED appears comparable to competing devices, with potentially fewer complications than first-generation flow diverters. Long-term and comparative studies are needed to further confirm these results.

FRED X flow diverter for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms: Two-center experience and mini-review of the literature

OBJECTIVE

The flow re-direction endoluminal device (FRED) is a safe and effective treatment option for intracranial aneurysms. The novel FRED X features an antithrombotic surface coating ("X Technology") on an otherwise unmodified stent design. This two-center study evaluates the clinical safety and efficacy of FRED X and compares it to the literature.

METHODS

Consecutive patients treated between 2020 and 2023 were retrospectively reviewed for aneurysm characteristics, procedural details and complications, and angiographic outcomes. A mini-review of the literature for FRED X clinical trials was performed and results were pooled using a random effects model.

RESULTS

Thirty-four patients (mean age 56 years) were treated for 34 aneurysms. The mean aneurysm size was 7.7 ± 5.0 mm, 7 (21%) were ruptured, 6 (18%) were recurrent after previous treatment, 11 (32.3%) were located in the posterior circulation, and 4 (12.5%) had non-saccular morphology. All procedures were technically successful and no balloon angioplasty was required. There was 1 (2.9%) symptomatic complication (a transient ischemic attack) and no procedural morbidity or mortality. Technical asymptomatic events included 1 procedural stent occlusion that was reopened with thrombectomy and 3 cases of vasospasm. Complete and adequate occlusion rates were 68% (19/28) and 89% (25/28) at a mean follow-up time of 6 months, respectively. The results of this study are comparable to previous FRED X studies.

CONCLUSIONS

The results demonstrate a high feasibility and procedural safety of the FRED X with adequate mid-term occlusion rates. Long-term and comparative studies are needed to evaluate the full potential of the FRED X.

Flow diverter stents for endovascular treatment of aneurysms: a comparative study of efficacy and safety between FREDX and FRED

BACKGROUND

The FRED X flow diverter (FREDX), as the second generation in the FRED series, aims to improve the treatment of cerebral aneurysms. This study compares the efficacy and safety of FREDX with its predecessor, FRED.

METHODS

This prospective registry included patients treated with FRED and FREDX devices. Efficacy was assessed using digital subtraction angiography with 3D volumetric reconstruction at immediate and 1 year follow-ups. Safety was evaluated by recording complications, analyzed through univariate contrasts, generalized mixed models, and Bayesian network analyses.

RESULTS

We treated 287 patients with 385 aneurysms, with 77.9% receiving FRED and 22.1% FREDX. The median age was 55 years (IQR 47-65) and 78.4% were women. The FREDX group showed a higher prevalence of saccular-like aneurysms (70.6% vs 52.7%, P=0.012) and a higher rate of complete occlusion compared with FRED interventions (79.4% vs 59.3%, P=0.022). After adjusting for confounders, these differences represented a 3.04-fold increased likelihood (95% CI 1.44 to 6.41, P=0.003) of achieving complete occlusion at 1 year with FREDX interventions. Regarding safety, two (3.5%) complications (both non-symptomatic) were observed in the FREDX group and 23 (10.4%) in the FRED group (P=0.166). Bayesian network analysis suggested a trend towards fewer complications for FREDX, with a median reduction of 5.5% in the posterior distribution of the prevalence of complications compared with FRED interventions.

CONCLUSIONS

The FREDX device shows improved complete occlusion rates at 1 year compared with the FRED device while maintaining a favourable safety profile, indicating its potential advantage in the treatment of cerebral aneurysms.

A Review of Current Flow Diverters

Flow diverter (FD) devices are new-generation stents placed in the parent artery at the aneurysmal neck to obstruct intra-aneurysmal blood flow, thus favoring intra-aneurysmal thrombosis. In Japan, about eight years have passed since health insurance approval was granted for FD devices, and FD placement to treat aneurysms has become widespread. Treatment indications have also been expanded with the introduction of novel devices. At present, three types of FD (Pipeline, FRED, and Surpass Streamline) are available in Japan. This report represents a compilation of available FD technologies and describes the current consensus on this treatment.

No Delayed Ruptures on Long-Term Follow-Up of a Case Series of Persistently Filling Saccular Internal Carotid Artery Aneurysms After Flow Diversion With the Pipeline Embolization Device

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Flow diversion of intracranial aneurysms results in high occlusion rates. However, 10% to 20% remain persistently filling at 1 year. Often, these are retreated, but benefits of retreatment are not well established. A better understanding of the long-term rupture risk of persistently filling aneurysms after flow diversion is needed.

METHODS

Our institutional database of 974 flow diversion cases was queried for persistently filling saccular aneurysms of the clinoidal, ophthalmic, and communicating segments of the internal carotid artery treated with the pipeline embolization device (PED, Medtronic). Persistent filling was defined as continued flow into the aneurysm on 1 year catheter angiogram. The clinical record was queried for retreatments and delayed ruptures. Clinical follow-up was required for at least 2 years.

RESULTS

Ninety-four persistent aneurysms were identified. The average untreated aneurysm size was 5.6 mm. A branch vessel originated separately in 55% of cases from the body of the aneurysm in 10.6% of cases and from the neck in 34% of cases. Eighteen percent of aneurysms demonstrated >95% filling at 1 year, and 61% were filling 5% to 95% of their original size. The mean follow-up time was 4.9 years, including 41 cases with >5 years. No retreatment was undertaken in 91.5% of aneurysms. There were no cases of delayed subarachnoid hemorrhage.

CONCLUSION

Among saccular internal carotid artery aneurysms treated with PED that demonstrated persistent aneurysm filling at 1 year, there were no instances of delayed rupture on long-term follow-up. These data suggest that observation may be appropriate for continued aneurysm filling at least in the first several years after PED placement.

Derivo embolization device for intracranial aneurysms: a Spanish multicenter retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Flow diverters have emerged in recent years as a safe and effective treatment for intracranial aneurysms, with expanding indications. The Derivo embolization device (DED) is a second-generation flow diverter with a surface finish that may reduce thrombogenicity. We report our multicenter experience evaluating its safety and efficacy.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed all patients treated with the DED in eight centers in Spain between 2016 and 2020. Demographics, clinical data, procedural complications, morbidity and aneurysm occlusion rates were collected.

RESULTS

A total of 209 patients with 250 aneurysms were treated (77.5% women). The majority of aneurysms were located in the internal carotid artery (86.8%) and most (69.2%) were small (<10 mm) with a median maximum diameter of 5.85 mm and median neck size of 4 mm. DED deployment was successful in all cases, despite two malfunctioning devices (1%). Major complications occurred in nine patients (4.3%), while mild neurologic clinical events were registered in 23 (11%); four patients died (1.9%). A total of 194 aneurysms had an angiographic follow-up at 6 months and showed complete aneurysm occlusion in 75% of cases. Twelve-month follow-up was available for 112 of the treated aneurysms, with a total occlusion rate of 83%.

CONCLUSION

The DED is a second-generation surface-modified flow diverter that presents an option for treatment of intracranial aneurysms with comparable safety and efficacy to other available flow diverter devices. Nonetheless, risks are not negligible, and must be balanced against the natural history risk of cerebral aneurysms, considering the tendency to widen indications for treatment of smaller and less complex lesions in day-to-day use.

Acute Distal Migration and Shortening of the Flow-Redirection Endoluminal Device: A Case Report

Objective

The flow diverter (FD) is a promising device. Apart from two main complications, hemorrhagic and ischemic ones, stent migration is reportedly an unusual complication. In particular, distal migration of the FD has rarely been reported. We report a case of asymptomatic acute distal migration of the flow-redirection endoluminal device (FRED).

Case Presentation

A 50-year-old woman was incidentally diagnosed with an unruptured right internal carotid-ophthalmic artery aneurysm with a maximum diameter of 8.0 mm, and she subsequently underwent endovascular treatment with FRED. Based on the vessel diameter (3.8 mm proximal and 3.6 mm distal to the aneurysm), a 4.0-mm-diameter and 18-mm-long FRED was deployed without postoperative complications. However, on MRA 12 months after treatment, the aneurysm was not occluded; angiography showed distal migration of the FRED. The postoperative MRA and skull X-ray images were retrospectively reviewed to determine the period of the migration. The skull X-ray images and the signal loss area due to the FRED on MRA 1 day after the treatment had already demonstrated the migration of the FRED. In the second treatment, a 4.0-mm-diameter and 23-mm-long FRED was deployed in an overlapping fashion up to the proximal part of the carotid siphon. Prompt identification of distal migration of the FD without neurologic signs could be challenging.

Conclusion

It is important to follow up meticulously with MRA and skull X-ray images after FD treatment for detecting stent migrations as early as possible.

Comparison of Flow-Redirection Endoluminal Device and Pipeline Embolization Device in the Treatment of Intracerebral Aneurysms

BACKGROUND

The use of flow diverters for treating intracranial aneurysms has been widely used in the past decade; however, data comparing pipeline embolization device (PED; Medtronic Inc) and flow-redirection endoluminal device (FRED; MicroVention) in the treatment of intracranial aneurysms remain scarce.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the outcomes of PED and FRED in the treatment of intracranial aneurysms.

METHODS

This is a single-center retrospective review of aneurysms treated with PED and FRED devices. Patients treated with PED or FRED were included. Cases requiring multiple or adjunctive devices were excluded. Primary outcome was complete aneurysm occlusion at 6 months. Secondary outcomes included good functional outcome, need for retreatment, and any complication.

RESULTS

The study cohort comprised 150 patients, including 35 aneurysms treated with FRED and 115 treated with PED. Aneurysm characteristics including location and size were comparable between the 2 cohorts. 6-month complete occlusion rate was significantly higher in the PED cohort (74.7% vs 51.5%; P = .017) but lost significance after inverse probability weights. Patients in the PED cohort were associated with higher rates of periprocedural complications (3.5% vs 0%; P = .573), and the rate of in-stent stenosis was approximately double in the FRED cohort (15.2% vs 6.9%; P = .172).

CONCLUSION

Compared with PED, FRED offers modest 6-month occlusion rates, which may be due to aneurysmal and baseline patient characteristics differences between both cohorts. Although not significant, FRED was associated with a higher complication rate mostly because of in-stent stenosis. Additional studies with longer follow-up durations should be conducted to further evaluate FRED thrombogenicity.

FRED flow diversion with LVIS protection of large posterior communicating artery aneurysm: the "FRELVIS" technique

Treatment of wide-necked posterior communicating artery (PCoA) aneurysms is extremely challenging, especially in fetal posterior cerebral artery (PCA) configurations. This technical video demonstrates the nuances of an innovative use of flow diversion to treat a recurrent wide-necked PCoA aneurysm. This middle-aged patient presented with recurrence of a previously ruptured, coil-embolized PCoA aneurysm. Initial attempts at Comaneci-assisted coiling were unsuccessful because the coil herniated into the middle cerebral artery (MCA). Therefore, a low-profile visualized intraluminal support (LVIS) was placed in the fetal PCA across the aneurysm ostium and a flow diverter was placed in the internal carotid artery and MCA to constitute a Y-construct. The video can be found here: https://stream.cadmore.media/r10.3171/2022.7.FOCVID2262.

A systematic review and meta-analysis of the Derivo Embolization Device: a novel surface-modified flow diverter for intracranial aneurysm treatment

BACKGROUND

Surface-modified flow diverters (FDs) designed to reduce thrombogenicity represent the next frontier for intracranial aneurysm treatment. The Derivo Embolization Device (DED) is a novel FD with titanium oxide and titanium oxynitride finishing of the struts. We performed a systematic review of pertinent literature, aiming to evaluate the device's effectiveness and safety.

METHODS

A literature search of PubMed, Embase, and MEDLINE was conducted following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines.

RESULTS

Five studies comprising 481 aneurysms were included. These studies were conducted in Turkey, Brazil, Germany, Poland, and Italy; two were prospective and three were retrospective. Twenty-six aneurysms (5.4%) were ruptured. The antiplatelet regimens were heterogeneous, but dual antiplatelet therapy was administered preprocedurally in all studies and maintained for 3-12 months before a switch to single antiplatelet therapy. The rate of periprocedural ischemic and hemorrhagic complications was 4.9% (95% CI 2.9% to 7%). Adjunctive coiling was used in 25.6% (95% CI 11.4% to 39.8%) of aneurysms. The complete angiographic occlusion rate was 81.4% (95% CI 71.3% to 91.5%), mortality rate was 2.1% (95% CI 0.4% to 3.9%), with follow-up ranging from 9 to 18 months. Delayed aneurysm rupture was reported in one patient.

CONCLUSIONS

The DED has been increasingly used in other countries. We identified low rates of periprocedural complications and mortality and a high rate of complete occlusion.