Atherectomy plus drug-coated balloon versus drug-coated balloon only for treatment of femoropopliteal artery lesions: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Comparative Outcomes of Supera Interwoven Nitinol Versus Eluvia Fluoropolymer-Based Drug-Eluting Stents for the Treatment of Severely Calcified Femoropopliteal Artery Lesions: Results of the ELDORADO Study

BACKGROUND

Supera interwoven nitinol stents (IWNS) and Eluvia fluoropolymer-based drug-eluting stents (DES) were designed to improve the patency of the femoropopliteal (FP) artery; however, which type of stent yields superior outcomes in calcified FP lesions remains unclear.

AIMS

To compare the safety and efficacy of Supera IWNS and Eluvia DES in severely calcified FP lesions.

METHODS

This study retrospectively analyzed 257 consecutive patients who underwent endovascular therapy using either IWNS (n = 123) or DES (n = 134) for FP lesions with peripheral arterial calcium scoring system (PACSS) grade 3 or 4 severe calcification between April 2018 and December 2021 at eight cardiovascular centers in Japan.

RESULTS

Propensity score (PS) matching extracted 138 matched patients with no remarkable intergroup difference in patient and lesion characteristics. The 1-year primary patency rates in the matched population were not significantly different between the IWNS and DES groups (85.4% vs. 89.8%, p = 0.320). A significant interaction between the stents used and the number of below-the-knee (BTK) runoff vessels was observed (interaction p = 0.048). The hazard ratio for restenosis was 2.68 (95% confidence interval, 0.51-14.2) in the group with no BTK runoff, favoring DES.

CONCLUSION

In PS-matched patients with severely calcified FP lesions, 1-year primary patency was not significantly different between treatments using Supera IWNS and Eluvia DES.

Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis of Vessel Preparation Techniques With Plain Balloon Angioplasty, Atherectomy, or Intravascular Lithotripsy Before Application of a Drug Coated Balloon to Treat Atherosclerotic Femoropopliteal Disease

OBJECTIVE

To compare one year outcomes after atherectomy, intravascular lithotripsy vs. plain balloon angioplasty before application of drug coated balloons for treating femoropopliteal atherosclerotic disease.

DATA SOURCES

MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library were screened until May 2023 for randomised controlled trials.

REVIEW METHODS

This was a systematic review and network meta-analysis. The inclusion criteria were patients with claudication and those with critical limb threatening ischaemia with lesion characteristics of all lengths, stenosis, calcification, and occlusions. The primary outcome was freedom from target lesion re-intervention at one year. Secondary outcomes were rate of bailout stenting, major amputation, and all cause mortality at one year. Pooled point estimates were calculated with a standard random effects model. Further sensitivity analyses were completed with a mixed treatment Bayesian model. Risk of bias was assessed by the Revised Cochrane Risk of Bias tool 2 (RoB2) and certainty of evidence assessed via the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) framework.

RESULTS

Four RCTs comprising 549 patients (two studies evaluating directional atherectomy, one evaluating rotational atherectomy, one evaluating intravascular lithotripsy against plain balloon angioplasty) were included. The weighted mean length of femoropopliteal lesions was 103.4 ± 6.67 mm. Results of the mixed treatment Bayesian analysis were consistent with pooled analysis for all outcomes. There were no significant differences in freedom from target lesion revascularisation (GRADE, high) (RoB2, low), major amputation (GRADE, low), or mortality (GRADE, moderate). Bailout stenting rates were significantly reduced with intravascular lithotripsy and atherectomy compared with plain balloon angioplasty (RR 0.25, 95% CI 0.07 - 0.89) (GRADE, moderate) (RoB2, low).

CONCLUSION

This review found that intravascular lithotripsy or atherectomy did not appear to incur a statistically significant advantage in freedom from target lesion revascularisation, major amputation, or mortality rate at one year. There was moderate certainty of evidence that bailout stenting is significantly reduced after vessel preparation with intravascular lithotripsy and atherectomy.

Predictors of recurrent restenosis after repeat drug-coated balloon therapy for drug-coated balloon restenosis in femoropopliteal lesions: Results of the RECURRENCE study

BACKGROUND

Despite the widespread use of drug-coated balloons (DCBs) for femoropopliteal (FP) lesions, there is still no consensus on treatment strategies for DCB restenosis. This study aimed to determine the risk factors for recurrent restenosis after repeat DCB therapy for DCB restenosis in FP lesions.

METHODS

This multicenter retrospective study assessed 1176 consecutive limbs in 860 patients who successfully received initial DCB therapy for FP lesions at four cardiovascular centers between May 2018 and December 2022. Among these patients, 118 consecutive limbs of 104 patients treated via repeat DCB for primary DCB restenosis were enrolled.

RESULTS

The Kaplan-Meier estimate of freedom from recurrent restenosis was 74.6% at 1 year. Cox proportional hazard multivariate analysis revealed that recurrent restenosis was independently associated with the time from initial DCB to primary restenosis (hazard ratio [HR], 0.85; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.79-0.92; p < 0.001), history of ≥2 endovascular therapies (EVTs) (HR, 3.11; 95%CI, 1.36-7.12; p = 0.007), and PACSS grade 3 or 4 (HR, 2.76; 95%CI, 1.15-6.63; p = 0.023). Furthermore, receiver operating characteristic curve analysis showed that the cutoff value of the time from initial DCB to primary restenosis to prevent recurrent restenosis was 12.6 months, with an area under the curve of 0.841 (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Repeat DCB therapy for DCB restenosis might be an acceptable strategy, particularly for restenosis that occurred more than 12.6 months after initial DCB, given the rate of freedom from recurrent restenosis.

Directional Atherectomy for Critical Lower Limb Ischemia: A Retrospective Observational Study

OBJECTIVE

Chronic arterial obstructive disease of the lower limbs is a significant global health issue. Directional atherectomy offers advantages in treating critical ischemia. The objective of this study is to determine the clinical outcomes of patients with critical ischemia who underwent directional atherectomy using the TurboHawkdevice.

METHODS

A retrospective review was conducted at Alma Mater Hospital in Medellín, Colombia, on all medical records of patients with critical limb ischemia (Rutherford Classes V and VI) who underwent directional atherectomy for infra-inguinal arterial disease.

RESULTS

A total of 42 atherectomies were performed in 41 patients, with 61% classified as Rutherford V and 24.4% as Rutherford VI. The average lesion length to be treated was 60 mm. Calcifications were found in 45.2% of cases, and predilatation angioplasty was used in 42.9% of cases. Atherectomy sites included femoropopliteal segment (40%), superficial femoral (29%), infrapopliteal vessels (14.2%), and more than one vessel in 50% of cases. Technical success was achieved in 78.6% of cases and procedural success in 97.6%, and the need for adjunctive conventional balloon angioplasty was 21.4%, while drug-coated balloon angioplasties were performed in 50% of limbs. The overall complication rate was 14.4%, with embolism at 4.8%, dissection at 4.8%, puncture at 2.4%, and perforation at 2.4%. The average follow-up duration was 12 months, and major amputations were required in 23.8% of cases. Improvement in ankle-brachial index to ≥0.1 was seen in 77% of limbs. Limb survival at 30 days was 85%, and at 90 days, it was 83%. The overall survival rate in the study was 79%.

CONCLUSIONS

Directional atherectomy is a safe alternative for managing critical ischemia in Rutherford V and VI patients.

The Midterm Outcomes of Endovascular Therapy for Femoropopliteal Lesions via Drug-Coated Balloon, Directional Atherectomy and Bare Metal Stent Angioplasty

Background

This study investigated the midterm primary patency of drug-coated balloons (DCBs), directional atherectomy plus balloon angioplasty (DA), and bare metal stent (BMS) angioplasty for the treatment of femoropopliteal lesions.

Methods

This two-center retrospective cohort study included 105 patients (110 limbs) undergoing DCB, DA, and BMS angioplasty-32 patients (34 limbs), 31 patients (32 limbs), and 42 patients (44 limbs), respectively. The demographic, baseline, and procedure data were collected, and the complications and midterm outcomes (patency, amputation-free survival, and clinically driven target lesion revascularization rates) were analyzed.

Results

All three procedures achieved a 100% success rate. Significant improvements were noted in ankle brachial index, walking distance, and Rutherford classification at 30 days post-procedure (p < 0.001), with no differences or severe complications among the groups. The all-cause mortality rate during the follow-up period, was 5.5%, and amputation-free survival rates at 24 months were 97.0%, 90.6% and 90.9% in the DCB, DA, and BMS angioplasty groups, respectively. The primary patency rate for the DCB group (79.4%) exceeded those of the DA (56.2%) and BMS (52.2%) groups (p < 0.05), with no significant difference between the DA and BMS groups at 24 months. The secondary patency and clinically driven target lesion revascularization rates were similar among the three groups. A runoff number ≤1, Trans-Atlantic Intersociety Consensus (TASC) D, and severe calcification were found to be independent risk factors for primary patency.

Conclusions

The DCB procedure demonstrated superior primary patency, compared to both BMS and DA procedures, in the treatment of femoropopliteal lesions.

Vessel Preparation in Infrapopliteal Arterial Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

PURPOSE

Infrapopliteal lesions are generally complex to treat due to small vessel diameter, long lesion length, multilevel disease, and severe calcification. Therefore, different vessel preparation devices have been developed to contribute to better peri- and postprocedural outcomes. This systematic review aims to compare different vessel preparation techniques prior to plain old balloon angioplasty (POBA) or drug-coated balloon (DCB) angioplasty with POBA or DCB alone in infrapopliteal arterial disease.

METHODS

Medline, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases were searched for studies published between 2000 and 2022 assessing the value of adjunctive vessel preparation in infrapopliteal arterial disease. The primary outcomes were 12-month primary patency and limb salvage.

RESULTS

A total of 1685 patients with 1913 lesions were included in 11 POBA studies. Methodological quality was assessed as poor to moderate in these studies. Only 2 studies with 144 patients assessed vessel preparation in conjunction with DCB angioplasty. These randomized trials were assessed as high quality and found no significant benefit of adjunctive atherectomy to DCB angioplasty. The pooled Kaplan-Meier estimates of 12-month primary patency and limb salvage in the POBA studies were 67.8% and 80.9% for POBA, 62.1% and 86.4% for scoring balloons, 67.9% and 79.6% for mechanical atherectomy (MA), and 79.7% and 82.6% for laser atherectomy, respectively. Within the pooled data only scoring balloons and MA demonstrated significantly improved 12-month limb salvage compared to POBA.

CONCLUSIONS

Different forms of adjunctive vessel preparation demonstrate similar 12-month outcomes compared to POBA and DCB angioplasty alone in infrapopliteal disease, with the exception of improved 12-month limb salvage in scoring balloons and MA. However, since the included studies were heterogeneous and assessed as poor to moderate methodological quality, selection bias may have played an important role. Main conclusion is that this systematic review found no additional value of standard use of vessel preparation.

CLINICAL IMPACT

Infrapopliteal arterial disease is associated with chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) and generally complex to treat due to small vessel diameter, long lesion length, multilevel disease and severe calcification. A wide range of vessel preparation devices have been developed to contribute to improved peri- and postprocedural outcomes in these complex lesions. This systematic review aims to compare different vessel preparation techniques prior to plain old balloon angioplasty (POBA) or drug coated balloon (DCB) angioplasty with POBA or DCB angioplasty alone in infrapopliteal arterial disease. Different forms of adjunctive vessel preparation demonstrate similar 12-month outcomes compared to POBA and DCB angioplasty alone in infrapopliteal disease, with the exception of improved 12-month limb salvage in scoring balloons and mechanical atherectomy (MA). However, since the included studies were heterogeneous and assessed as poor to moderate methodological quality, selection bias may have played an important role. Main conclusion is that this systematic review found no additional value of standard use of vessel preparation.

Comparison of mid-outcome among bare metal stent, atherectomy with or without drug-coated balloon angioplasty for femoropopliteal arterial occlusion

This study evaluated the outcomes of a bare metal stent (BMS), DCB alone, atherectomy plus a drug-coated balloon (AT + DCB) and AT alone for the treatment of femoropopliteal artery occlusion. Four groups were included in this retrospective cohort study: 119 patients underwent the BMS procedure, 89 patients underwent DCB alone, 52 patients underwent AT + DCB, and 61 patients underwent AT alone. Patients were followed-up at 1, 6, 12 and 24 months after the procedure, the clinical outcomes and complications were assessed, and the primary outcomes were primary patency and restenosis. AT + DCB showed a lower bailout stent, and BMS displayed a higher retrograde puncture, flow-limiting dissection and postdilation (p < 0.05). For all procedures, the walking distance, ABI and pain score post-procedure were significantly improved compared with the pre-procedure values (p < 0.001). The restenosis rate was higher in BMS (21.0%) and AT alone (24.6%) than in DCB (10.1%) alone and AT + DCB (11.5%) (p = 0.04); there was no difference in amputation or clinically driven target lesion revascularization among procedures. The primary patency rates were 77.7%, 89.4%, 88.0% and 73.7% in the BMS, DCB alone, AT + DCB and AT alone groups at 24 months, respectively (p = 0.03), while the secondary patency and main adverse events (stroke, MI and death) were similar. Proximal concavity, proximal target vessel diameter ≥ 5 mm, runoff number ≥ 2 and DCB use were protective factors for primary patency. Our results suggested that AT + DCB and DCB alone were associated with higher primary patency, and DCB devices (combined with/without AT) should be the preferred choice for FP lesions.

Stand-Alone Rotational Atherectomy Versus Combination With Drug-Coated Balloon Angioplasty for the Endovascular Treatment of Heavily-Calcified Femoropopliteal and Popliteal Lesions

BACKGROUND

Despite major technical advances in the endovascular treatment for peripheral artery disease (PAD), heavy calcification still represents a major obstacle to overcome both due to the high number of periprocedural complications (dissections, embolization, etc) and the limited long-term durability. A promising tool to overcome these obstacles is debulking calcified lesions with atherectomy. Since vessel preparation with atherectomy might even improve the diffusion of antiproliferative substances, we wanted to evaluate the impact of atherectomy±DCB in lower extremity PAD.

OBJECTIVES

To explore the safety, efficacy, and long-term durability on treatment of rotational atherectomy in heavily-calcified complex femoropopliteal and isolated popliteal lesions. In addition, we wanted to investigate whether advanced debulking strategies where atherectomy is followed by a drug-coated angioplasty bear an additional advantage over atherectomy and standard percutaneous angioplasty alone in terms of clinical success and freedom from target lesion revascularization.

RESULTS

In total, 218 femoropopliteal and 46 popliteal predominantly heavily-calcified lesions have been investigated. Of 264 cases, in a total of 53 cases, atherectomy treatment was followed by a drug-eluting balloon (DEB) angioplasty (43 in the femoropopliteal and 10 in the popliteal lesions). The lesions were characterized by a significant length (17.3±12.1 cm) and complexity (TASC C in 48.4% and TASC D in 19.7%). During a mean follow-up of 19 (±11) months, a total of 12 patients (4.5%) died. Clinically-driven target lesion revascularization (CD-TLR) was performed in 32 (14.7%) femoropopliteal and 11 isolated popliteal (23.9%) lesions and did not differ significantly between stand-alone atherectomy and atherectomy followed by a DEB. Mean ABI was improved from 0.57±0.22 immediately before intervention to 0.86±0.23 on intervention and remained stable: 0.83±0.16 at follow-up. During follow-up, a mean Rutherford category was reduced from 3.64±1.0 to 2.38±0.98.

CONCLUSIONS

Our real-life study provides evidence that atherectomy in combination with DEB is safe and effective but did not have a significant impact on the freedom from target lesion revascularization in our population. Additional large-scale randomized trials are needed to verify these findings.

CLINICAL IMPACT

This study investigates the efficacy and safety of combining rotational atherectomy with drug-coated balloon (DCB) angioplasty for treating heavily calcified femoropopliteal and isolated popliteal lesions in peripheral artery disease (PAD). The retrospective analysis of 264 patients highlights the potential of this combination in improving procedural success and reducing periinterventional complications. While demonstrating an excellent procedural and clinical success rate over an average 19-month follow-up, the study finds no significant long-term benefit in freedom from target lesion revascularization (TLR) compared to atherectomy alone. These findings suggest the need for further research to optimize treatment strategies for complex PAD cases, particularly in evaluating the long-term clinical benefits of such combined interventions.

Efficacy and Safety of Atherectomy Combined With Balloon Angioplasty vs Balloon Angioplasty Alone in Patients With Femoro-Popliteal Lesions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

BACKGROUND

Balloon angioplasty (BA), including drug-coated balloons (DCBs) and percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA), has traditionally been used to treat femoral-popliteal lesions. However, in recent years, atherectomy (ATH) has been proposed as a complementary approach. To assess the effectiveness of ATH compared with BA alone in patients with femoral-popliteal artery lesions, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs).

METHODS

We included RCTs that focused on patients with femoral-popliteal artery lesions and reported data on the use of ATH and BA therapy. Two reviewers conducted a literature search, refined the data, and assessed the risk of bias.

RESULTS

We included a total of 6 RCTs involving 399 patients with femoral-popliteal artery lesions. The use of ATH in combination with BA appeared to improve the patency rate at 12 months (odds ratio [OR]=2.04, 95% confidence interval [CI]=1.14-3.62). In addition, ATH with BA was associated with lower major amputation rates (MD=2.01, 95% CI=0.06-0.77, p=0.02) and a decreased likelihood of bailout stenting (OR=0.07, 95% CI=0.02-0.25, p=0.001). However, there were no statistically significant differences between the groups in terms of target lesion revascularization (TLR) at 12 months, major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs), and distal embolization events. In addition, we performed subgroup analysis for different ATH devices and BA types.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on this meta-analysis, it can be concluded that the use of ATH in combination with BA is a safe and effective method for treating femoral-popliteal artery lesions. In addition, the patency rate at 1 year is superior to treatment with BA alone. Atherectomy also reduces the likelihood of amputation and bailout stenting. Clinicians should consider these findings when designing future RCTs and developing clinical practice guidelines.

CLINICAL IMPACT

This meta-analysis summarises a number of existing studies to advance understanding of the atherectomy devices and to reveal its potential. This new technique, when compared with drug coated balloon, shows the possibility of obtaining better clinical outcomes in femoro-popliteal lesions than drug-coated balloon alone, such as higher 12-month primary patency rates as shown in some studies. Currently, it is important to consider the appropriate technology applicable for individualised treatment. atherectomy devices seem to provide clinicians with additional options in clinical practice and to benefit patients in the future. This requires more high quality studies to explore the role and benefits of atherectomy devices in femoro-popliteal lesions.

Prospective, Multicenter Study of Rotational Atherectomy with Antirestenotic Therapy for Infrainguinal Arterial Disease

BACKGROUND

Thrombi are common in steno-occlusive lesions of infrainguinal atherosclerotic diseases. Despite the easy passage of guidewires through these lesions, conventional ballooning or stenting cannot effectively treat them, and patients are at risk of distal embolization. This study aimed to investigate the clinical outcomes of using a rotational aspiration atherectomy system to treat infrainguinal atherosclerotic disease.

METHODS

Patients underwent revascularization of target lesions using the Jetstream™ Atherectomy System. The primary endpoint was the freedom from clinically driven target lesion revascularization (CD-TLR) 12-month after the procedure. Outcomes were evaluated according to the clinical severity, lesion type, use of drug-coated balloons (DCBs), and lesion length, characteristics, and sites. Survival analysis for CD-TLR over time was plotted. All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS version 22 (IBM; Armonk, NY, USA). P-values <0.05 were considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

In total, 150 patients (91.2% male; mean age, 69.8 years; 66.2% with diabetes) with de novo or restenotic infrainguinal lesions were enrolled. The mean lesion length was 17.2 cm, 75.0% were occlusive, and 38.2% had severe calcification. The lesion types were sclerotic (64.7%), thrombosclerotic (20.6%), thrombotic (8.8%), and in-stent (5.9%). Adjunctive DCB was used in 86.8% of patients. The 12-month primary patency rate (PPR) and CD-TLR rates were 81.6% and 90.1%, respectively. The 12-month CD-TLR rate was significantly better in the sclerotic and thrombosclerotic groups than in the thrombotic group (100% and 100% vs. 66.7%; P = 0.001). The 12-month PPR was significant better in TransAtlantic Inter-Society Consensus (TASC) A and B groups than TASC C and D groups (P = 0.02). The 12-month PPR is significantly better after using a DCB or stent placement than after using a simple balloon (P = 0.01). There were no major adverse events, including procedure-related death, myocardial infarction, or major amputation.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study demonstrated the safety and effectiveness of the Jetstream atherectomy device for complex infrainguinal lesions. This system functions optimally with TASC A/B lesions and sclerotic or thrombosclerotic lesions.

Directional atherectomy and drug-coated balloon angioplasty vs. bare nitinol stent angioplasty for femoropopliteal artery lesions

Background: The present study evaluated the prognosis of directional atherectomy (DA)+drug-coated balloon (DCB) angioplasty for femoropopliteal artery lesions compared with bare nitinol stent (BNS). Patients and methods: This retrospective cohort study included patients with femoropopliteal artery lesions who underwent percutaneous endovascular surgery between January 2016 and June 2019. The primary outcome was the primary patency rate after 12, 24, and 36 months; the secondary outcomes comprised incidence of flow-limiting dissections, technical success, limb salvage, and all-cause death. Results: During the study period, 110 (44%) patients underwent DA+DCB, and 140 (56%) patients underwent bare nitinol stent (BNS). There were no differences in the 12- and 24-month patency rates of the two groups (98.2% vs. 93.6% and 68.2% vs. 60.0%, both p>.05). The 36-month primary patency rate in the DA+DCB group was significantly higher than that of the BNS group (27.3% vs. 15.7%, p=.003). The technical success rate and all-cause death were similar between groups (p>.05). Flow-limiting dissections occurred more frequently in the BNS group than in the DA+DCB group (27.9% vs. 10.9%, p=.033). After adjustment for potential confounders, such as sex, smoking, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, ABI after surgery, TASC II B, lesion length ≥15 cm, two-vessel runoff, and three-vessel runoff, the HR for primary patency rate comparing BNS to DA+DCB was 2.61 (95%CI: 1.61-4.25). Conclusions: In this retrospective cohort study, DA+DCB was associated with a higher 30-month primary patency rate and a lower flow-limiting dissection incidence than BNS.

Atherectomy vs Other Modalities for Treatment During Peripheral Vascular Intervention

PURPOSE OF THE REVIEW

Calcified atheroma is frequently encountered in peripheral vascular intervention. Standard treatment with balloon and/or stenting alone does poorly in these cases due to vessel recoil, suboptimal luminal gain, and inadequate stent expansion. In light of the above challenges with angioplasty and stenting for PAD, endovascular atherectomy has emerged as a novel technology for atheroma treatment and removal, offering the benefits of surgical endarterectomy in a minimally invasive percutaneous approach. This review outlines the endovascular atherectomy devices available in clinical practice to date, compares and contrasts their mode of action, summarizes the relevant published data on indication and role of atherectomy over other treatment modalities for PAD, and discusses the future prospective on this emerging technology.

RECENT FINDINGS

Currently, there are host of peripheral atherectomy devices available with unique mechanism of action and relative advantages and disadvantages. Despite these recent technological advancements, there remains a paucity of data from well-designed studies regarding the superiority of atherectomy as an adjunctive treatment versus standard treatment with balloon and stenting. Emerging data have supported its use to improve patency rates in conjunction with drug-coated balloons. Although associated risks, including distal embolization and perforation, are often marginal, the cost of these devices to the healthcare system necessitates further investment in to establishing level 1 data to support their use. Peripheral atherectomy has the potential to improve limb-related outcomes, potentially through reduced need for bail-out scaffolds and improved drug uptake. Nonetheless, further investment in the evidence foundation supporting these devices versus standard practices is required.

Endovascular treatment of high-risk peripheral vascular occlusive lesions: a review of current evidence and emerging applications of intravascular lithotripsy, atherectomy, and paclitaxel-coated devices

Endovascular treatment of peripheral arterial disease has evolved and expanded rapidly over the last 20 years. New technologies have increased the diversity of devices available and have made it possible to approach even the most challenging and high-risk lesions using endovascular techniques. In this review, we examine the clinical evidence available for several categories of endovascular devices available to treat peripheral arterial disease, including intravascular lithotripsy, atherectomy, and drug-coated devices. The best application for some technologies, such as intravascular lithotripsy and atherectomies, have yet to be identified. In contrast, drug-coated devices have an established role in patients at high risk for long-term failure, but have been the subject of much controversy, given recent concerns about possible adverse effects of paclitaxel. Future investigation should further assess these technologies in patients with complex disease using updated staging systems and outcomes with direct clinical relevance, such as functional improvement, wound healing, and freedom from recurrent symptoms.

United States Investigational Device Exemption study of the Revolution™ Peripheral Atherectomy System

OBJECTIVE

Atherectomy has become commonplace as an adjunct to interventional treatments for peripheral arterial disease, but the procedures have been complicated by risks including distal embolization and arterial perforation. This study aimed to examine the safety and effectiveness of a novel atherectomy system to treat femoropopliteal and below-knee peripheral arterial disease.

METHODS

The Revolution Peripheral Atherectomy System (Rex Medical LP, Conshohocken, Pa) was studied in 121 patients with 148 femoropopliteal and below-knee lesions, enrolled at 17 United States institutions. Technical success was defined when the post-atherectomy angiographic stenosis was ≤50%, as assessed by an independent core laboratory. Major adverse events were adjudicated by an independent Clinical Events Committee.

RESULTS

Among 148 site-identified target lesions in 121 patients, 21.4% were in the superficial femoral artery, 13.7% involved the popliteal artery, and 67.9% were in tibial arteries; 3.1% involved more than one segment. Technical success was 90.2%, with stenoses decreasing from 73% ± 19% at baseline to 42% ± 14% after atherectomy. Adjunctive treatment after atherectomy included angioplasty with uncoated balloons in 91%, drug-coated balloons in 11%, bare stent deployment in 8%, and drug-eluting stent placement in 3%. Procedural success (<30% residual stenosis) was achieved in 93.7% of target lesions. Complications during the procedure included one target vessel perforation and two distal embolizations; each of which were adjudicated by the Clinical Events Committee as unrelated to the device and were not visualized angiographically by the core laboratory. Freedom from major adverse events was 97.3% through 30 days. The Kaplan-Meier estimates of primary, assisted primary, and secondary patency were 81.6%, 87.7%, and 91.6% at 6 months, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of the Revolution Peripheral Atherectomy System was associated with few procedural complications and a high rate of success at the index procedure and through 6 months.