Impact of arteriovenous fistulas versus arteriovenous grafts on vascular access performance in haemodialysis patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Heterogeneous gene expression during early arteriovenous fistula remodeling suggests that downregulation of metabolism predicts adaptive venous remodeling

Clinical outcomes of arteriovenous fistulae (AVF) for hemodialysis remain inadequate since biological mechanisms of AVF maturation and failure are still poorly understood. Aortocaval fistula creation (AVF group) or a sham operation (sham group) was performed in C57BL/6 mice. Venous limbs were collected on postoperative day 7 and total RNA was extracted for high throughput RNA sequencing and bioinformatic analysis. Genes in metabolic pathways were significantly downregulated in the AVF, whereas significant sex differences were not detected. Since gene expression patterns among the AVF group were heterogenous, the AVF group was divided into a 'normal' AVF (nAVF) group and an 'outliers' (OUT) group. The gene expression patterns of the nAVF and OUT groups were consistent with previously published data showing venous adaptive remodeling, whereas enrichment analyses showed significant upregulation of metabolism, inflammation and coagulation in the OUT group compared to the nAVF group, suggesting the heterogeneity during venous remodeling reflects early gene expression changes that may correlate with AVF maturation or failure. Early detection of these processes may be a translational strategy to predict fistula failure and reduce patient morbidity.

Arteriovenous Fistula Maturation in Patients with Ipsilateral Versus Contralateral Tunneled Dialysis Catheter: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Although it is evident that a prior history of tunneled dialysis catheter (TDC) affects arteriovenous fistula (AVF) function, it is unclear whether its location (contralateral versus ipsilateral to AVF) has any effect on AVF maturation and failure rates. We aimed to document this possible effect.

METHODS

This systematic review and meta-analysis were performed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Studies comparing outcomes between patients with contralateral TDC (CONTRA group) and those with ipsilateral one (IPSI group) were examined for inclusion. A random effects model meta-analysis of the odds ratio (OR) was conducted. Primary outcomes were AVF functional maturation, assisted maturation, and failure rates.

RESULTS

Four eligible studies comprising 763 patients were included in the meta-analysis. There were no significant differences in terms of AVF functional maturation (OR: 1.49; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.64-3.47; I2 = 83.4%), assisted maturation (OR: 0.59; 95% CI: 0.29-1.19; I2 = 61.4%), and failure rates (OR: 0.67; 95% CI: 0.29-1.58; I2 = 83.3%) between the 2 study groups.

CONCLUSIONS

TDC laterality seems not to affect fistula maturation rate in patients requiring TDC placement and concurrent AVF creation, but rather, vein- and patient-related characteristics might play a more important role in choosing TDC access site. Further studies are needed to validate these results.

Comparing post-maturation outcomes of arteriovenous grafts and fistulae

BACKGROUND

Though arteriovenous grafts (AVG) mature more reliably than arteriovenous fistulae (AVF) and require fewer maturation procedures (MP) to obtain functional patency, AVG are thought to have worse function after maturation. We explored differences in post-maturation outcomes between the following groups: AVF patients who did (AS-AVF) and did not (unAS-AVF) require assisted maturation and AVG patients who did (AS-AVG) and did not (unAS-AVG) require assisted maturation.

METHODS

Using the US Renal Data System (2012-2017), we retrospectively identified patients who initiated dialysis with a central venous catheter, underwent AVF or AVG placement and achieved successful two-needle cannulation. Primary patency and access abandonment after maturation were compared across groups using competing risks regression methods, generating sub-hazards ratios (sHR).

RESULTS

We identified 42,664 AVF and 12,335 AVG that met inclusion criteria. A larger proportion of AVFs required interventions: 18,408 AVF (43.2%) versus 2594 AVG (21.0%; p < 0.01). Both AS-AVG and AS-AVF patients experienced patency loss at 1 year more frequently compared with unAS-AVG (67.5% & 57.5% vs 55.2% respectively). Patency loss was lowest in unAS-AVF (38.9%). These trends were robust on adjusted analysis (unAS-AVG reference, AS-AVG sHR = 1.44, p < 0.01; AS-AVF sHR = 1.08, p < 0.01, unAS-AVF sHR = 0.67, p < 0.01). AS-AVGs were more likely to be abandoned than unAS-AVGs (11.7% unAS-AVG vs 17.2% AS-AVG). Fistulae, assisted or not, had lower unadjusted rates of 1-year abandonment than grafts (8.9% AS-AVF vs 7.3% unAS-AVF). On adjusted analysis, AVF usage was protective against abandonment (unAS-AVG, reference; AS-AVF sHR = 0.67, p < 0.01; unAS-AVF sHR = 0.59, p < 0.01) while AS-AVG was not (AS-AVG sHR = 1.32, p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

unAS-AVF have the best long-term outcomes. AS-AVF lose primary patency at a higher rate than unAS-AVG. AVGs may be a better choice than AVFs if veins are marginal and likely to require assisted maturation. Further research is needed to identify anatomic and physiologic factors that affect long-term performance and influence conduit choice.

Assessing Time to Removal of Tunneled Dialysis Catheters after Arteriovenous Access Creation

BACKGROUND

Tunneled dialysis catheters (TDCs) are a temporary bridge until definitive arteriovenous (AV) access is established. Our objective was to evaluate the time to TDC removal in patients who underwent AV access creations with TDCs already in place.

METHODS

A single-center analysis of all AV access creations in patients with TDCs was performed (2014-2020). Primary outcome was time to TDC removal after access creation.

RESULTS

There were 364 AV access creations with TDCs in place. The average age was 58 years, 44% of patients were female, and 64% were Black. The median time to TDC removal was 113 days (range, 22-931 days) with 71.4% having a TDC >90 days after access creation. Patients with TDC >90 days were often older (60 vs. 54.7), had hypertension (98.1% vs. 93.3%), were diabetic (65.4% vs. 47.1%), and had longer average time to maturation (107.1 vs. 55.4 days, P < 0.001) and first access (114 vs. 59.4 days, P < 0.001). Multivariable analysis showed that older age was associated with prolonged TDC placement (odds ratio [OR] 1.03, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.01-1.05, P = 0.005) and prosthetic graft use was associated with shorter TDC indwelling time (OR 0.09, 95% CI 0.04-0.23, P ≤ 0.001). Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that 87% of TDCs were removed at 1 year.

CONCLUSIONS

The majority of patients with TDCs who underwent AV access creation had prolonged TDC placement. Prosthetic graft use was associated with shorter catheter times. Close follow-up after access placement, improving maturation times, and access type selection should be considered to shortened TDC times.

Vascular access challenges in hemodialysis patients with superior vena cava syndrome

BACKGROUND

Superior vena cava syndrome in hemodialysis patients resulting from previous or current use of a tunneled central vein catheter is a rare but potentially severe condition. Two aspects have to be addressed during management and treatment: the restoration of central venous flow and the creation of an alternative vascular access to guarantee hemodialysis.

RESEARCH DESIGN

Conforming to the current guidelines and literature, we present a stepwise approach and discuss therapeutic options. The removal of the tunneled central vein catheter should be attempted and a native vascular access created whenever feasible.

RESULTS

First, an upper extremity AVF should be preserved or, as in our case, made functional. Endovascular treatment of CVSO should primarily consist of balloon dilatation. Placement of a stent or stent graft should be considered as a secondary option. HeRO graft placement may be considered in recurrent CVSO and recanalization with a Surfacer. LL-AVF or AVG need to be discussed and may be an alternative for certain HD patients when the risk of lower limb ischemia and infection is considered.

CONCLUSION

Several therapeutic options are available and the basic principles are well established in the literature, although the level of evidence is not high. Therefore, we propose a stepwise and interdisciplinary approach to guide the challenging decision-making process in SVC.

Cost-effectiveness analysis of endovascular vs surgical arteriovenous fistula creation in the United States

OBJECTIVE

In the United States, an estimated $2.8 billion annually is spent on vascular access and its complications. Endovascular arteriovenous fistula (endoAVF) creation is a novel, minimally invasive alternative to traditional surgical AV fistula (sAVF) creation in ≤60% of patients. Although cost effective in single-payer systems, the clinical and financial impact of endoAVF in the United States remains uncertain.

METHODS

We constructed a decision tree followed by a probabilistic cohort state-transition model to study the cost effectiveness of endoAVF vs sAVF creation. We conducted a systematic review to obtain input parameters including technical success, maturation, patency, and utility values. We derived costs from the Medicare 2022 fee schedule and from the literature. We used a 5-year time horizon, an annual discount rate of 3% for costs and utilities (measured in quality-adjusted life-years [QALYs]), and the common willingness-to-pay threshold of $50,000. One-way and Monte Carlo probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed varying technical success, patency, reintervention, cost, and utility parameters.

RESULTS

In the base-case scenario, endoAVF ($30,129 average per-person costs, 2.19 QALYs gained, 65% patent at 5 years) was not cost effective compared with sAVF ($12.987 average per-person costs, 2.11 QALYs gained, 66% patent at 5 years), generating an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $227,504 per QALY gained. In one-way sensitivity analyses, endoAVF becomes cost effective when the initial cost of sAVF creation exceeds endoAVF by ≥$600 (eg, if endoAVF creation costs ≤$3000 relative to the base-case sAVF cost of $3600), the additional QALYs gained from endoAVF exceeds 0.12 QALYs/year (eg, 0.81 QALYs gained/year from endoAVF compared with base-case sAVF 0.69 QALYs/year), the endoAVF maturation rate is >90% (base case 78%), or the sAVF maturation rate is <65% (base case 78%). Probabilistic sensitivity analysis demonstrated that sAVF remained the optimal strategy in 71% of iterations.

CONCLUSIONS

EndoAVF is not cost effective compared with sAVF when modeling 5-year outcomes. The main driver of sAVF remaining cost effective is the four times higher up-front cost for endoAVF creation, as well as a relatively low additional increase in quality of life for endoAVF. It will be important to establish how the endoAVF learning curve contributes to upfront costs and, given the annual cost attributed to vascular access nationally, a randomized controlled trial is warranted.

Autologous forearm arteriovenous loop vascular access, an option to be considered

BACKGROUND

Autologous arteriovenous fistula is usually the vascular access of choice for hemodialysis in patients with chronic kidney disease. Autologous forearm loops with cephalic or basilic vein are an alternative in those cases with a suitable forearm vein but with an unsuitable radial artery; however they are rarely used and there is little reported evidence of their usefulness. Our objective is to report our results on the creation of autogenous forearm loops as vascular access for hemodialysis.

METHODS

We present a prospective cohort study of autogenous forearm loop arteriovenous fistula created between 2010 and 2022, in patients with stage 4-5 chronic kidney disease. Demographic data, surgical details, vein used, follow up to 24 months, maturation, utilization, primary, assisted, and secondary patency estimations with Kaplan-Meier curves, as well as complications during follow-up, were recorded.

RESULTS

During the study period, 22 autologous forearm loops were created, 14 of them with cephalic, and 8 with basilic vein. Most (59%) of the patients were men, 19 were already on dialysis and the rest started during follow-up. Sixteen patients had previous vascular accesses. One patient was lost during follow-up. Six-week maturation rate was 61.9% and utilization rate was 57.1%. 6, 12, and 24 months primary and secondary patencies were 75.4%, 59.2%, 41.5% and 85.0%, 69.5%, 56.9% respectively. In five patients an access-induced distal ischemia was diagnosed, four successfully treated and only one patient lost the access. No cases of infection or other major complications were reported.

CONCLUSION

Autologous forearm loops have acceptable maturation (61.9%) and patency rates at follow-up (56.9% 2-years secondary patency). Although rarely used, they are a vascular access alternative that should be considered to preserve the proximal vasculature of the arm for future accesses.