The prognostic values of neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio in traumatically injured patients upon admission: A mini-Review

Prognostic Value of Dynamic Segmented Neutrophil to Monocyte (SeMo) Ratio Changes in Patients with Moderate to Severe Traumatic Brain Injury

BACKGROUND

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in trauma patients, necessitating reliable prognostic tools. The segmented neutrophil-to-monocyte (SeMo) ratio, indicative of the inflammatory response, has emerged as a valuable biomarker. This study evaluates the prognostic value of dynamic changes in the SeMo ratio in predicting outcomes for patients with moderate to severe TBI.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted on data from 1118 TBI patients admitted to the surgical intensive care unit at a level I trauma center between January 2009 and December 2020. Patients were selected based on an Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) score ≥ 3 in the head region. Initial and follow-up SeMo ratios were calculated upon admission and 48-72 h later, respectively. The dynamic SeMo ratio was defined as the difference between the second and initial SeMo ratios. Statistical analyses included receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis to determine the optimal threshold for mortality prediction, and comparative analysis of clinical outcomes.

RESULTS

The study cohort included 121 deceased and 997 surviving patients. Deceased patients had significantly higher second SeMo ratios (20.9 ± 16.1 vs. 15.8 ± 17.2, p = 0.001) and dynamic SeMo ratios (2.4 ± 19.8 vs. -2.1 ± 19.5, p = 0.019) than those survival patients. In the multivariate analysis, the dynamic SeMo is a significant independent risk factor for in-hospital mortality (OR 1.01, 95%CI: 1.01-1.03, p = 0.031). The optimal cut-off for the dynamic SeMo ratio was 5.96, above which patients exhibited higher mortality (21.4% vs. 8.5%, p < 0.001), higher adjusted mortality (adjusted odds ratio: 2.98; 95% confidence interval: 1.95-4.56; p = 0.005), and longer hospital stays (23.6 days vs. 19.7 days, p = 0.005).

DISCUSSION

Dynamic SeMo ratio changes serve as a prognostic marker for in-hospital mortality and hospital stay duration in moderate to severe TBI patients. A higher dynamic SeMo ratio indicates increased risk, highlighting the importance of early monitoring and intervention. Future prospective studies should validate these findings and explore integration with other biomarkers for enhanced prognostication.

A novel scoring system for early prediction of massive transfusion requirement in trauma patients

Early resuscitation using blood products is critical for patients with severe hemorrhagic shock. We aimed to develop and validate a new scoring system, hemorrhagic shock transfusion prediction (HSTP) score, to predict the need for massive transfusion (MT) in these patients, compared to the widely used Assessment of Blood Consumption (ABC) score. Trauma patients admitted to Emtiaz Hospital in Iran from 2017 to 2021 were retrospectively included. Patients assigned a code 1 or 2 according to the Emergency severity index (ESI) triage system have been divided into MT and non-MT groups. MT was defined as receiving ≥ 10 units of packed cells (PCs) in 24 h. Demographic information, admission vital signs, and lab results available within 15 min were compared between the groups. A new predictive score was developed using logistic regression of statistically significant parameters. Out of 1029 patients, 651 (63.3%) required MT. An arrival, diastolic blood pressure < 79.5 mm Hg, absolute lymphocyte count > 1850/μL, base excess < - 4.25, and blood glucose > 156 mg/dL were independent predictors included in the HSTP score. The sensitivity and specificity were 74.36% and 53.87% for the HSTP score, compared to 31.03% and 76.16% for the ABC score. Moreover, the positive and negative predictive values were 77.88% and 49.03% for the HSTP score, versus 74.15% and 33.66% for ABC. The new scoring system demonstrated higher sensitivity and improved positive and negative predictive values compared to the ABC score. This score can assist physicians in making accurate transfusion decisions quickly, but further prospective studies are warranted to validate its clinical utility.

Relationship between neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio and diabetic peripheral neuropathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The present study aims to review the existing scientific literature on the role of neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) in diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) to perform a meta-analysis on the available data.

METHODS

The electronic repositories Web of Science, PubMed, and Scopus were systematically explored starting from their establishment up until June 9, 2022.

RESULTS

Fifteen articles were included in the meta-analysis after multiple screening according to the PRISMA guidelines. The combined findings indicated that individuals with DPN had higher levels of NLR in comparison to those without DPN (SMD = 0.61; CI 95% = 0.40-0.81, p < 0.001). In the subgroup assessment based on ethnicity, it was observed that diabetic patients with DPN exhibited increased NLR levels in contrast to those without DPN in studies conducted in India (SMD = 1.30; CI 95% = 0.37-2.24, p = 0.006) and East Asia (SMD = 0.53; CI 95% = 0.34-0.73, p < 0.001) but not in studies conducted in Turkey (SMD = 0.30; CI 95% = - 0.06-0.67, p = 0.104) and Egypt (SMD = 0.34; CI 95% = -0.14-0.82, p = 0.165). The pooled sensitivity of NLR was 0.67 (95% CI = 0.49-0.81), and the pooled specificity was 0.70 (95% CI, 0.56-0.81). The pooled positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) of NLR were 2.30 (95% CI = 1.71-3.09), 0.45 (95%CI = 0.30-0.67), and 5.06 (95% CI = 3.16-8.12), respectively.

CONCLUSION

NLR serves as a distinct marker of inflammation, and its rise in cases of DPN suggests an immune system imbalance playing a role in the development of the disease.