1
|
Lapin B, Boehnke JR. Introduction to "PRISMA-COSMIN for outcome measurement instruments 2024". Qual Life Res 2024; 33:2025-2027. [PMID: 38967868 DOI: 10.1007/s11136-024-03731-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/06/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Brittany Lapin
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
- Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Jan R Boehnke
- School of Health Sciences, University of Dundee, 11 Airlie Place, Dundee, DD1 4HJ, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Mackenzie ACL, Chung S, Hoppes E, Mickler AK, Cartwright AF. Measurement of changes to the menstrual cycle: A transdisciplinary systematic review evaluating measure quality and utility for clinical trials. PLoS One 2024; 19:e0306491. [PMID: 39052601 PMCID: PMC11271926 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0306491] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2024] [Accepted: 06/18/2024] [Indexed: 07/27/2024] Open
Abstract
Despite the importance of menstruation and the menstrual cycle to health, human rights, and sociocultural and economic wellbeing, the study of menstrual health suffers from a lack of funding, and research remains fractured across many disciplines. We sought to systematically review validated approaches to measure four aspects of changes to the menstrual cycle-bleeding, blood, pain, and perceptions-caused by any source and used within any field. We then evaluated the measure quality and utility for clinical trials of the identified instruments. We searched MEDLINE, Embase, and four instrument databases and included peer-reviewed articles published between 2006 and 2023 that reported on the development or validation of instruments assessing menstrual changes using quantitative or mixed-methods methodology. From a total of 8,490 articles, 8,316 were excluded, yielding 174 articles reporting on 94 instruments. Almost half of articles were from the United States or United Kingdom and over half of instruments were only in English, Spanish, French, or Portuguese. Most instruments measured bleeding parameters, uterine pain, or perceptions, but few assessed characteristics of blood. Nearly 60% of instruments were developed for populations with menstrual or gynecologic disorders or symptoms. Most instruments had fair or good measure quality or clinical trial utility; however, most instruments lacked evidence on responsiveness, question sensitivity and/or transferability, and only three instruments had good scores of both quality and utility. Although we took a novel, transdisciplinary approach, our systematic review found important gaps in the literature and instrument landscape, pointing towards a need to examine the menstrual cycle in a more comprehensive, inclusive, and standardized way. Our findings can inform the development of new or modified instruments, which-if used across the many fields that study menstrual health and within clinical trials-can contribute to a more systemic and holistic understanding of menstruation and the menstrual cycle.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amelia C. L. Mackenzie
- Global Health and Population, FHI 360, Washington, District of Columbia, United States of America
| | - Stephanie Chung
- Global Health and Population, FHI 360, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America
- Department of Maternal and Child Health, University of North Carolina Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America
| | - Emily Hoppes
- Global Health and Population, FHI 360, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America
| | - Alexandria K Mickler
- Research, Technology and Utilization Division, United States Agency for International Development and the Public Health Institute, Office of Population and Reproductive Health, Bureau for Global Health, Washington, District of Columbia, United States of America
| | - Alice F. Cartwright
- Global Health and Population, FHI 360, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America
- Department of Maternal and Child Health, University of North Carolina Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Schuster ALR, Crossnohere NL, Boakye EA, Angove R, Baldwin B, Barreto EA, Chen RC, Gillespie TW, Hamilton B, McCleary NJ, Karmo M, Kaufmann T, Lee W, Mehta V, Meyer L, Mittal K, Owens L, Peterson R, Pusic A, Rainey AM, Richardson A, Shapiro L, Sibbitt B, Smith C, Vargo M, Vickers A, Brundage M, Snyder C. A Framework to Promote Implementation of Patient-Reported Outcomes in Institutions Caring for Vulnerable and Underserved Cancer Populations. THE PATIENT 2024:10.1007/s40271-024-00703-9. [PMID: 38909128 DOI: 10.1007/s40271-024-00703-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/23/2024] [Indexed: 06/24/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Anne L R Schuster
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH, USA.
| | - Norah L Crossnohere
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH, USA
| | | | | | - Billie Baldwin
- MedStar Franklin Square Medical Center, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Esteban A Barreto
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Ronald C Chen
- University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Vikas Mehta
- Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Larissa Meyer
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | | | | | - Rachel Peterson
- Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Andrea Pusic
- Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | | | - Lauren Shapiro
- University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Bethany Sibbitt
- School of Pharmacy, Cedarville University, Cedarville, OH, USA
| | | | - Mary Vargo
- MetroHealth Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Andrew Vickers
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Michael Brundage
- Queen's University Cancer Research Institute, Cancer Care and Epidemiology, Kingston, ON, Canada
| | - Claire Snyder
- Departments of Medicine, Oncology, and Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Schools of Medicine and Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Ojo AS, Araoye MO, Ali A, Sarma R. The impact of current therapeutic options on the health-related quality of life of patients with relapse/refractory multiple myeloma: a systematic review of clinical studies. J Cancer Surviv 2024; 18:673-697. [PMID: 36645615 DOI: 10.1007/s11764-023-01332-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2022] [Accepted: 01/05/2023] [Indexed: 01/17/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Patients with relapse and/or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) have a high disease burden with poor health-related quality of life (HRQoL) which worsens with each additional relapse. We aimed to review the impact of triplet, doublet, monotherapies, and salvage autologous stem cell transplantation on the HRQoL of RRMM patients. METHODS We performed a comprehensive literature search of Medline/PubMed, Wiley Cochrane Library, EMBASE, Scopus, CINAHL, and Clinicaltrials.gov to identify clinical studies in RRMM patients with HRQoL as an outcome measure. The ISOQoL and CONSORT-PRO extension guidelines were used to assess the quality of HRQoL reporting. We synthesized the result using a qualitative analysis. RESULTS A total of 10,245 RRMM patients enrolled in 28 eligible studies received either a triplet, doublet regimen, monotherapy, or salvage autologous stem cell transplantation. The EORTC QLQ-C30 was the most used questionnaire, and compliance with HRQoL reporting standards is generally poor among studies without an additional HRQoL publication. Most of the current therapeutic options are at best able to maintain HRQoL at baseline but not improve it. The methodological and reporting heterogeneity among the studies complicates generalizations. CONCLUSIONS Many of the current treatment regimens for RRMM have demonstrated clinical effectiveness in trials. Unlike newly diagnosed MM, these regimens are less likely to result in significant improvement in HRQoL in RRMM. This should be communicated to patients before initiating therapies. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS Individualized therapeutic approach for RRMM should be chosen based on a shared decision-making process that aligns clinical efficacy with patients' treatment priorities and HRQoL.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ademola S Ojo
- Department of Internal Medicine, Howard University Hospital, 2041 Georgia Ave. NW, Washington, DC, USA.
| | - Mojisola O Araoye
- Hematology/Oncology Division, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
| | - Ahmed Ali
- Department of Medicine, Hematology/Oncology Division, Howard University Hospital, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Ravi Sarma
- Department of Medicine, Hematology/Oncology Division, Howard University Hospital, Washington, DC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Raghu G, Ghazipura M, Fleming TR, Aronson KI, Behr J, Brown KK, Flaherty KR, Kazerooni EA, Maher TM, Richeldi L, Lasky JA, Swigris JJ, Busch R, Garrard L, Ahn DH, Li J, Puthawala K, Rodal G, Seymour S, Weir N, Danoff SK, Ettinger N, Goldin J, Glassberg MK, Kawano-Dourado L, Khalil N, Lancaster L, Lynch DA, Mageto Y, Noth I, Shore JE, Wijsenbeek M, Brown R, Grogan D, Ivey D, Golinska P, Karimi-Shah B, Martinez FJ. Meaningful Endpoints for Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis (IPF) Clinical Trials: Emphasis on 'Feels, Functions, Survives'. Report of a Collaborative Discussion in a Symposium with Direct Engagement from Representatives of Patients, Investigators, the National Institutes of Health, a Patient Advocacy Organization, and a Regulatory Agency. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2024; 209:647-669. [PMID: 38174955 DOI: 10.1164/rccm.202312-2213so] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2023] [Accepted: 01/02/2024] [Indexed: 01/05/2024] Open
Abstract
Background: Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) carries significant mortality and unpredictable progression, with limited therapeutic options. Designing trials with patient-meaningful endpoints, enhancing the reliability and interpretability of results, and streamlining the regulatory approval process are of critical importance to advancing clinical care in IPF. Methods: A landmark in-person symposium in June 2023 assembled 43 participants from the US and internationally, including patients with IPF, investigators, and regulatory representatives, to discuss the immediate future of IPF clinical trial endpoints. Patient advocates were central to discussions, which evaluated endpoints according to regulatory standards and the FDA's 'feels, functions, survives' criteria. Results: Three themes emerged: 1) consensus on endpoints mirroring the lived experiences of patients with IPF; 2) consideration of replacing forced vital capacity (FVC) as the primary endpoint, potentially by composite endpoints that include 'feels, functions, survives' measures or FVC as components; 3) support for simplified, user-friendly patient-reported outcomes (PROs) as either components of primary composite endpoints or key secondary endpoints, supplemented by functional tests as secondary endpoints and novel biomarkers as supportive measures (FDA Guidance for Industry (Multiple Endpoints in Clinical Trials) available at: https://www.fda.gov/media/162416/download). Conclusions: This report, detailing the proceedings of this pivotal symposium, suggests a potential turning point in designing future IPF clinical trials more attuned to outcomes meaningful to patients, and documents the collective agreement across multidisciplinary stakeholders on the importance of anchoring IPF trial endpoints on real patient experiences-namely, how they feel, function, and survive. There is considerable optimism that clinical care in IPF will progress through trials focused on patient-centric insights, ultimately guiding transformative treatment strategies to enhance patients' quality of life and survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ganesh Raghu
- Center for Interstitial Lung Diseases, Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine, Department of Medicine
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, and
| | - Marya Ghazipura
- ZS Associates, Global Health Economics and Outcomes Research, New York, New York
- Division of Epidemiology and
- Division of Biostatistics, Department of Population Health, New York University Langone Health, New York, New York
| | - Thomas R Fleming
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - Kerri I Aronson
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York
| | - Jürgen Behr
- Department of Medicine V, LMU University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Member of the German Center for Lung Research, Munich, Germany
| | | | - Kevin R Flaherty
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Ella A Kazerooni
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
- Division of Cardiothoracic Radiology, Department of Radiology, University of Michigan Health System, Detroit, Michigan
| | - Toby M Maher
- Department of Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California
| | - Luca Richeldi
- Divisione di Medicina Polmonare, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Joseph A Lasky
- Department of Medicine, Tulane University, New Orleans, Louisiana
| | | | - Robert Busch
- Division of Pulmonology, Allergy, and Critical Care, Office of Immunology and Inflammation, and
| | - Lili Garrard
- Division of Biometrics III, Office of Biostatistics, Office of Translational Sciences, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, and
| | - Dong-Hyun Ahn
- Division of Biometrics III, Office of Biostatistics, Office of Translational Sciences, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, and
| | - Ji Li
- Division of Clinical Outcome Assessment, Office of Drug Evaluation Sciences, Office of New Drugs, and
| | - Khalid Puthawala
- Division of Pulmonology, Allergy, and Critical Care, Office of Immunology and Inflammation, and
| | - Gabriela Rodal
- Office of Product Evaluation and Quality, Center for Devices and Radiological Health, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland
| | - Sally Seymour
- Division of Pulmonology, Allergy, and Critical Care, Office of Immunology and Inflammation, and
| | - Nargues Weir
- Office of Product Evaluation and Quality, Center for Devices and Radiological Health, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland
| | - Sonye K Danoff
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Neil Ettinger
- Division of Pulmonary Medicine, St. Luke's Hospital, Chesterfield, Missouri
| | - Jonathan Goldin
- Department of Radiology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - Marilyn K Glassberg
- Department of Medicine, Stritch School of Medicine, Loyola Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Leticia Kawano-Dourado
- Hcor Research Institute - Hcor Hospital, São Paolo, Brazil
- Pulmonary Division, Heart Institute (InCor), University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Nasreen Khalil
- Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Lisa Lancaster
- Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - David A Lynch
- Department of Radiology, National Jewish Health, Denver, Colorado
| | - Yolanda Mageto
- Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine, Baylor University, Dallas, Texas
| | - Imre Noth
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | | | - Marlies Wijsenbeek
- Centre of Interstitial Lung Diseases, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Robert Brown
- Patient representative and patient living with IPF, Lovettsville, Virginia
| | - Daniel Grogan
- Patient representative and patient living with IPF, Charlottesville, Virginia; and
| | - Dorothy Ivey
- Patient representative and patient living with IPF, Richmond, Virginia
| | - Patrycja Golinska
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York
| | - Banu Karimi-Shah
- Division of Pulmonology, Allergy, and Critical Care, Office of Immunology and Inflammation, and
| | - Fernando J Martinez
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Klassen AF, Rae C, O’Malley M, Breitkopf T, Algu L, Mansouri J, Brown CR, Wang Y, Lipner SR. Development and Validation of a Patient-Reported Outcome Measure for Fingernail and Toenail Conditions: The NAIL-Q. Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol 2023; 16:3091-3105. [PMID: 37915422 PMCID: PMC10617399 DOI: 10.2147/ccid.s429120] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2023] [Accepted: 10/07/2023] [Indexed: 11/03/2023]
Abstract
Background Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are needed to measure outcomes that matter to people with nail conditions, from their perspective. Objective To design a comprehensive new PROM (NAIL-Q) to measure outcomes important in toenail and fingernail conditions. Methods A mixed methods iterative approach was used. Phase 1 involved concept elicitation interviews that were audio-recorded, transcribed, and coded line-by-line. Concepts were developed into scales and refined through cognitive debriefing interviews with patients and expert input. Data was then collected from an international sample using a crowdsource platform. Eligible participants were aged ≥18 years with a nail condition for at least 3 months. Rasch Measurement Theory (RMT) analysis was used to examine item and scale performance. Other psychometric tests included test-retest reliability, and convergent and construct validity. Results Phase 1 interviews involved 23 patients with 10 nail conditions and input from 11 dermatologists. The analysis led to the development of 84 items for field-testing. In Phase 2, 555 participants completed the survey. Toenail conditions (n = 441) were more common than fingernail conditions (n = 186). The RMT analysis reduced the number of items tested to 45 in 7 scales measuring nail appearance, health-related quality of life concerns, and treatment outcomes. All items had ordered thresholds and nonsignificant chi-square p values. Reliability statistics with and without extremes for the Person Separation Index were ≥0.79 and Cronbach's alpha were ≥0.83, and for intraclass correlation coefficients were ≥0.81. Construct validity was further supported in that most participants agreed that the NAIL-Q was easy to understand, asked relevant and important questions in a respectful way, and that it should be used to inform clinical care. Conclusion The NAIL-Q is a rigorously designed and tested PROM that measures nail appearance, health-related quality of life and treatment outcomes. This PROM can be used in clinical practice to inform patient care and to include the patient perspective in research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne F Klassen
- Department of Pediatrics, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Charlene Rae
- Department of Pediatrics, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Maureen O’Malley
- Division of Dermatology, Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Trisia Breitkopf
- Department of Pediatrics, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Leah Algu
- Department of Pediatrics, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jasmine Mansouri
- Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Claire R Brown
- Department of Dermatology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York City, NY, USA
| | - Yi Wang
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Shari R Lipner
- Department of Dermatology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York City, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Muilwijk D, van Paridon TJ, van der Heijden DC, Faber-Bisschop BM, Zomer-van Ommen DD, Heijerman HG, van der Ent CK. Development and validation of a novel personalized electronic patient-reported outcome measure to assess quality of life (Q-LIFE): a prospective observational study in people with Cystic Fibrosis. EClinicalMedicine 2023; 62:102116. [PMID: 37554124 PMCID: PMC10404867 DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2023.102116] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2023] [Revised: 06/23/2023] [Accepted: 07/06/2023] [Indexed: 08/10/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Generic and disease-specific patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) may lack relevance and sensitivity on a patient-level in chronic diseases with differential disease expression and high individual variability, such as Cystic Fibrosis (CF). This study aimed to develop and validate a novel personalized electronic PROM (ePROM) that captures relevant aspects of quality of life in individuals with CF. METHODS The Q-Life app was developed as a short personalized ePROM to assess individual quality of life. Psychometric properties were assessed in a single-center cross-sectional study between September 2019 and September 2021 and in a prospective cohort study between September 2021 and September 2022. FINDINGS Combined studies included 223 participants (median age: 24 years, IQR: 19.0-32.5 years, range: 12.0-58.0 years). Internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha: 0.83-0.90) and test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient: 0.90; 95% CI: 0.65-0.92; p < 0.001) of quality of life (Q-Life) scores were strong. Q-Life scores were associated with overall Cystic Fibrosis Questionnaire-Revised (CFQ-R) scores (ρ = 0.71; p < 0.001), CFQ-R respiratory domain scores (ρ = 0.57; p < 0.001) and forced expiratory volume in 1s (ρ = 0.41; p < 0.001). Furthermore, Q-Life scores improved from 65.0 (IQR: 45.0-63.3) at baseline to 84.2 (IQR: 75.0-95.0) and 87.5 (IQR: 75.0-100.0) after 3 and 6 months of elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor treatment (change: 20.8; 95% CI: 17.5-25.0; p < 0.001), comparable to CFQ-R respiratory domain scores (change: 22.2, 95% CI: 19.4-25.0, p < 0.001). INTERPRETATION The Q-Life app is a reliable, valid and sensitive personalized ePROM to measure all aspects of quality of life that really matter to individuals with Cystic Fibrosis. This patient-centered approach could provide important advantages over generic and disease-specific PROMs in the era of personalized medicine and value-based healthcare. FUNDING Dutch Cystic Fibrosis Foundation, Health-Holland.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Danya Muilwijk
- Department of Pediatric Pulmonology, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Utrecht, Lundlaan 6, 3584 EA, Utrecht, the Netherlands
- Department of Pulmonology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Tessa J. van Paridon
- Department of Pediatric Pulmonology, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Utrecht, Lundlaan 6, 3584 EA, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Doris C. van der Heijden
- Department of Pediatric Pulmonology, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Utrecht, Lundlaan 6, 3584 EA, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Brenda M. Faber-Bisschop
- Dutch Cystic Fibrosis Foundation (NCFS), Dr. Albert Schweitzerweg 3a, 3744 MG, Baarn, the Netherlands
| | | | - Harry G.M. Heijerman
- Department of Pulmonology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Cornelis K. van der Ent
- Department of Pediatric Pulmonology, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Utrecht, Lundlaan 6, 3584 EA, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Aronson KI, Martin-Schwarze AM, Swigris JJ, Kolenic G, Krishnan JK, Podolanczuk AJ, Kaner RJ, Martinez FJ, Safford MM, Pinheiro LC. Validity and Reliability of the Fatigue Severity Scale in a Real-World Interstitial Lung Disease Cohort. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2023; 208:188-195. [PMID: 37099412 PMCID: PMC10395489 DOI: 10.1164/rccm.202208-1504oc] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2022] [Accepted: 04/25/2023] [Indexed: 04/27/2023] Open
Abstract
Rationale: Fatigue is a common and debilitating symptom for people living with interstitial lung disease (ILD). Studies on fatigue in ILD are limited, and little headway has been made toward developing interventions targeting the alleviation of fatigue. A barrier to progress is a lack of knowledge around the performance characteristics of a patient-reported outcome measure to assess fatigue in patients with ILD. Objectives: To assess the validity and reliability of the Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS) for measuring fatigue in a national cohort of patients with ILD. Methods: FSS scores and several anchors were measured in 1,881 patients from the Pulmonary Fibrosis Foundation Patient Registry. Anchors included the Short Form 6D Health Utility Index (SF-6D) score and a single vitality question from the SF-6D; the University of California, San Diego, Shortness of Breath Questionnaire; FVC; DlCO; and 6-minute-walk distance. Internal consistency reliability, concurrent validity, and known-groups validity were assessed. Structural validity was assessed using confirmatory factor analysis. Measurements and Main Results: The FSS demonstrated high internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.96). There were moderate to strong correlations between FSS score and patient-reported anchors (vitality question from the SF-6D [r = 0.55] and University of California, San Diego, Shortness of Breath Questionnaire total score [r = 0.70]) and weak correlations between FSS score and physiological measures (FVC [r = -0.24], percentage predicted DlCO [r = -0.23], and 6-minute-walk distance [r = -0.29]). Higher mean FSS scores, indicating greater fatigue, were observed among patients using supplemental oxygen, those prescribed steroids, and those with lower percentage predicted FVC and percentage predicted DlCO. The confirmatory factor analysis results suggest that the nine questions of the FSS reflect one dimension of fatigue. Conclusions: Fatigue is an important patient-centered outcome in ILD that is poorly correlated with physiological measures of disease severity, including lung function and walk distance. These findings further support the need for a reliable and valid measure of patient-reported fatigue in ILD. The FSS possesses acceptable performance characteristics for assessing fatigue and distinguishing different degrees of fatigue among patients with ILD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Adam M. Martin-Schwarze
- Statistical Analysis of Biomedical and Educational Research Group, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan; and
| | | | - Giselle Kolenic
- Statistical Analysis of Biomedical and Educational Research Group, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan; and
| | | | | | - Robert J. Kaner
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care
- Department of Genetic Medicine, and
| | | | - Monika M. Safford
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York
| | - Laura C. Pinheiro
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York
| | - the Pulmonary Fibrosis Foundation
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care
- Department of Genetic Medicine, and
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York
- Statistical Analysis of Biomedical and Educational Research Group, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan; and
- National Jewish Health, Denver, Colorado
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Hyland CJ, Mou D, Virji AZ, Sokas CM, Bokhour B, Pusic AL, Mjåset C. How to make PROMs work: qualitative insights from leaders at United States hospitals with successful PROMs programs. Qual Life Res 2023:10.1007/s11136-023-03388-z. [PMID: 36928649 PMCID: PMC10018634 DOI: 10.1007/s11136-023-03388-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/01/2023] [Indexed: 03/18/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Elucidate facilitators, barriers, and key lessons learned regarding the implementation of system-wide clinical patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) programs among United States (US) healthcare leaders. METHODS We conducted semi-structured interviews with 35 US healthcare leaders, including chief-level executives, data directors, PROM directors, and department chairs involved in PROM implementation across seven diverse healthcare systems from February to June 2020. Transcripts were coded, evaluated for qualitative themes, and categorized according to the consolidated framework for implementation research (CFIR). RESULTS According to US hospital leaders with experience in existing clinical PROM programs, there are facilitators and barriers to implementation success in each CFIR domain. Allowing clinicians to select PROM measures and ensuring a user-friendly data platform (intervention); adapting data collection to patient home environments (outer setting); informing clinicians of the multi-faceted use of PROM data for research, clinical care, and business (inner setting); implementing PROM education earlier into clinician training (characteristics of individuals); and establishing specialty-agnostic PROM implementation teams (process) were among key facilitators to implementation success. CONCLUSION Leaders of geographically and clinically diverse PROM programs in the US identify common themes that facilitate successful implementation. Drivers of success depend on factors within and outside the clinical environment. These findings may serve to guide both establishing new PROM programs and refining existing PROM programs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Danny Mou
- Department of Surgery, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
| | | | - Claire M Sokas
- Department of Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Barbara Bokhour
- Department of Population and Quantitative Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School, Worcester, MA, USA
| | | | - Christer Mjåset
- Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.,The Commonwealth Fund, 1 E 75th St, New York City, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Begg CB. Evolving challenges in clinical trials design. Clin Trials 2022; 19:237-238. [PMID: 35706344 DOI: 10.1177/17407745221101276] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Colin B Begg
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|