1
|
Ouyang Y, Taljaard M, Forbes AB, Li F. Maintaining the validity of inference from linear mixed models in stepped-wedge cluster randomized trials under misspecified random-effects structures. Stat Methods Med Res 2024:9622802241248382. [PMID: 38807552 DOI: 10.1177/09622802241248382] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/30/2024]
Abstract
Linear mixed models are commonly used in analyzing stepped-wedge cluster randomized trials. A key consideration for analyzing a stepped-wedge cluster randomized trial is accounting for the potentially complex correlation structure, which can be achieved by specifying random-effects. The simplest random effects structure is random intercept but more complex structures such as random cluster-by-period, discrete-time decay, and more recently, the random intervention structure, have been proposed. Specifying appropriate random effects in practice can be challenging: assuming more complex correlation structures may be reasonable but they are vulnerable to computational challenges. To circumvent these challenges, robust variance estimators may be applied to linear mixed models to provide consistent estimators of standard errors of fixed effect parameters in the presence of random-effects misspecification. However, there has been no empirical investigation of robust variance estimators for stepped-wedge cluster randomized trials. In this article, we review six robust variance estimators (both standard and small-sample bias-corrected robust variance estimators) that are available for linear mixed models in R, and then describe a comprehensive simulation study to examine the performance of these robust variance estimators for stepped-wedge cluster randomized trials with a continuous outcome under different data generators. For each data generator, we investigate whether the use of a robust variance estimator with either the random intercept model or the random cluster-by-period model is sufficient to provide valid statistical inference for fixed effect parameters, when these working models are subject to random-effect misspecification. Our results indicate that the random intercept and random cluster-by-period models with robust variance estimators performed adequately. The CR3 robust variance estimator (approximate jackknife) estimator, coupled with the number of clusters minus two degrees of freedom correction, consistently gave the best coverage results, but could be slightly conservative when the number of clusters was below 16. We summarize the implications of our results for the linear mixed model analysis of stepped-wedge cluster randomized trials and offer some practical recommendations on the choice of the analytic model.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yongdong Ouyang
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada
- School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Monica Taljaard
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada
- School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Andrew B Forbes
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Fan Li
- Department of Biostatistics, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT, USA
- Center for Methods in Implementation and Prevention Science, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Nevins P, Ryan M, Davis-Plourde K, Ouyang Y, Macedo JAP, Meng C, Tong G, Wang X, Ortiz-Reyes L, Caille A, Li F, Taljaard M. Adherence to key recommendations for design and analysis of stepped-wedge cluster randomized trials: A review of trials published 2016-2022. Clin Trials 2024; 21:199-210. [PMID: 37990575 PMCID: PMC11003836 DOI: 10.1177/17407745231208397] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND/AIMS The stepped-wedge cluster randomized trial (SW-CRT), in which clusters are randomized to a time at which they will transition to the intervention condition - rather than a trial arm - is a relatively new design. SW-CRTs have additional design and analytical considerations compared to conventional parallel arm trials. To inform future methodological development, including guidance for trialists and the selection of parameters for statistical simulation studies, we conducted a review of recently published SW-CRTs. Specific objectives were to describe (1) the types of designs used in practice, (2) adherence to key requirements for statistical analysis, and (3) practices around covariate adjustment. We also examined changes in adherence over time and by journal impact factor. METHODS We used electronic searches to identify primary reports of SW-CRTs published 2016-2022. Two reviewers extracted information from each trial report and its protocol, if available, and resolved disagreements through discussion. RESULTS We identified 160 eligible trials, randomizing a median (Q1-Q3) of 11 (8-18) clusters to 5 (4-7) sequences. The majority (122, 76%) were cross-sectional (almost all with continuous recruitment), 23 (14%) were closed cohorts and 15 (9%) open cohorts. Many trials had complex design features such as multiple or multivariate primary outcomes (50, 31%) or time-dependent repeated measures (27, 22%). The most common type of primary outcome was binary (51%); continuous outcomes were less common (26%). The most frequently used method of analysis was a generalized linear mixed model (112, 70%); generalized estimating equations were used less frequently (12, 8%). Among 142 trials with fewer than 40 clusters, only 9 (6%) reported using methods appropriate for a small number of clusters. Statistical analyses clearly adjusted for time effects in 119 (74%), for within-cluster correlations in 132 (83%), and for distinct between-period correlations in 13 (8%). Covariates were included in the primary analysis of the primary outcome in 82 (51%) and were most often individual-level covariates; however, clear and complete pre-specification of covariates was uncommon. Adherence to some key methodological requirements (adjusting for time effects, accounting for within-period correlation) was higher among trials published in higher versus lower impact factor journals. Substantial improvements over time were not observed although a slight improvement was observed in the proportion accounting for a distinct between-period correlation. CONCLUSIONS Future methods development should prioritize methods for SW-CRTs with binary or time-to-event outcomes, small numbers of clusters, continuous recruitment designs, multivariate outcomes, or time-dependent repeated measures. Trialists, journal editors, and peer reviewers should be aware that SW-CRTs have additional methodological requirements over parallel arm designs including the need to account for period effects as well as complex intracluster correlations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pascale Nevins
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Mary Ryan
- Department of Biostatistics, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Kendra Davis-Plourde
- Department of Biostatistics, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT, USA
- Yale Center for Analytical Sciences, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Yongdong Ouyang
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
- School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Can Meng
- Yale Center for Analytical Sciences, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Guangyu Tong
- Department of Biostatistics, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT, USA
- Center for Methods in Implementation and Prevention Science, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Xueqi Wang
- Department of Biostatistics, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT, USA
- Section of Geriatrics, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Luis Ortiz-Reyes
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Agnès Caille
- Université de Tours, Université de Nantes, INSERM, SPHERE U1246, Tours, France
- INSERM CIC 1415, CHRU de Tours, Tours, France
| | - Fan Li
- Department of Biostatistics, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT, USA
- Center for Methods in Implementation and Prevention Science, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Monica Taljaard
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
- School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ouyang Y, Hemming K, Li F, Taljaard M. Estimating intra-cluster correlation coefficients for planning longitudinal cluster randomized trials: a tutorial. Int J Epidemiol 2023; 52:1634-1647. [PMID: 37196320 PMCID: PMC10555741 DOI: 10.1093/ije/dyad062] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/11/2022] [Accepted: 04/26/2023] [Indexed: 05/19/2023] Open
Abstract
It is well-known that designing a cluster randomized trial (CRT) requires an advance estimate of the intra-cluster correlation coefficient (ICC). In the case of longitudinal CRTs, where outcomes are assessed repeatedly in each cluster over time, estimates for more complex correlation structures are required. Three common types of correlation structures for longitudinal CRTs are exchangeable, nested/block exchangeable and exponential decay correlations-the latter two allow the strength of the correlation to weaken over time. Determining sample sizes under these latter two structures requires advance specification of the within-period ICC and cluster autocorrelation coefficient as well as the intra-individual autocorrelation coefficient in the case of a cohort design. How to estimate these coefficients is a common challenge for investigators. When appropriate estimates from previously published longitudinal CRTs are not available, one possibility is to re-analyse data from an available trial dataset or to access observational data to estimate these parameters in advance of a trial. In this tutorial, we demonstrate how to estimate correlation parameters under these correlation structures for continuous and binary outcomes. We first introduce the correlation structures and their underlying model assumptions under a mixed-effects regression framework. With practical advice for implementation, we then demonstrate how the correlation parameters can be estimated using examples and we provide programming code in R, SAS, and Stata. An Rshiny app is available that allows investigators to upload an existing dataset and obtain the estimated correlation parameters. We conclude by identifying some gaps in the literature.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yongdong Ouyang
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada
- School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Karla Hemming
- Institute of Applied Health Research, The University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Fan Li
- Department of Biostatistics, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT, USA
- Center for Methods in Implementation and Prevention Science, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Monica Taljaard
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada
- School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Ouyang Y, Kulkarni MA, Protopopoff N, Li F, Taljaard M. Accounting for complex intracluster correlations in longitudinal cluster randomized trials: a case study in malaria vector control. BMC Med Res Methodol 2023; 23:64. [PMID: 36932347 PMCID: PMC10021932 DOI: 10.1186/s12874-023-01871-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2022] [Accepted: 02/20/2023] [Indexed: 03/19/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The effectiveness of malaria vector control interventions is often evaluated using cluster randomized trials (CRT) with outcomes assessed using repeated cross-sectional surveys. A key requirement for appropriate design and analysis of longitudinal CRTs is accounting for the intra-cluster correlation coefficient (ICC). In addition to exchangeable correlation (constant ICC over time), correlation structures proposed for longitudinal CRT are block exchangeable (allows a different within- and between-period ICC) and exponential decay (allows between-period ICC to decay exponentially). More flexible correlation structures are available in statistical software packages and, although not formally proposed for longitudinal CRTs, may offer some advantages. Our objectives were to empirically explore the impact of these correlation structures on treatment effect inferences, identify gaps in the methodological literature, and make practical recommendations. METHODS We obtained data from a parallel-arm CRT conducted in Tanzania to compare four different types of insecticide-treated bed-nets. Malaria prevalence was assessed in cross-sectional surveys of 45 households in each of 84 villages at baseline, 12-, 18- and 24-months post-randomization. We re-analyzed the data using mixed-effects logistic regression according to a prespecified analysis plan but under five different correlation structures as well as a robust variance estimator under exchangeable correlation and compared the estimated correlations and treatment effects. A proof-of-concept simulation was conducted to explore general conclusions. RESULTS The estimated correlation structures varied substantially across different models. The unstructured model was the best-fitting model based on information criteria. Although point estimates and confidence intervals for the treatment effect were similar, allowing for more flexible correlation structures led to different conclusions based on statistical significance. Use of robust variance estimators generally led to wider confidence intervals. Simulation results showed that under-specification can lead to coverage probabilities much lower than nominal levels, but over-specification is more likely to maintain nominal coverage. CONCLUSION More flexible correlation structures should not be ruled out in longitudinal CRTs. This may be particularly important in malaria trials where outcomes may fluctuate over time. In the absence of robust methods for selecting the best-fitting correlation structure, researchers should examine sensitivity of results to different assumptions about the ICC and consider robust variance estimators.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yongdong Ouyang
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, 1053 Carling Ave, Ottawa, ON, K1Y 4E9, Canada.
- School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, 600 Peter Morand Crescent, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
| | - Manisha A Kulkarni
- School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, 600 Peter Morand Crescent, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Natacha Protopopoff
- Department of Disease Control, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Fan Li
- Department of Biostatistics, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT, USA
- Center for Methods in Implementation and Prevention Science, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Monica Taljaard
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, 1053 Carling Ave, Ottawa, ON, K1Y 4E9, Canada
- School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, 600 Peter Morand Crescent, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Klegerman ME, Moody MR, Huang SL, Peng T, Laing ST, Govindarajan V, Danila D, Tahanan A, Rahbar MH, Vela D, Genstler C, Haworth KJ, Holland CK, McPherson DD, Kee PH. Demonstration of ultrasound-mediated therapeutic delivery of fibrin-targeted pioglitazone-loaded echogenic liposomes into the arterial bed for attenuation of peri-stent restenosis. J Drug Target 2023; 31:109-118. [PMID: 35938912 DOI: 10.1080/1061186x.2022.2110251] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2022] [Revised: 07/28/2022] [Accepted: 08/01/2022] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
Peri-stent restenosis following stent implantation is a major clinical problem. We have previously demonstrated that ultrasound-facilitated liposomal delivery of pioglitazone (PGN) to the arterial wall attenuated in-stent restenosis. To evaluate ultrasound mediated arterial delivery, in Yucatan miniswine, balloon inflations were performed in the carotid and subclavian arteries to simulate stent implantation and induce fibrin formation. The fibrin-binding peptide, GPRPPGGGC, was conjugated to echogenic liposomes (ELIP) containing dinitrophenyl-L-alanine-labelled pioglitazone (DNP-PGN) for targeting purposes. After pre-treating the arteries with nitroglycerine, fibrin-binding peptide-conjugated PGN-loaded ELIP (PAFb-DNP-PGN-ELIP also termed atheroglitatide) were delivered to the injured arteries via an endovascular catheter with an ultrasound core, either with or without ultrasound application (EKOSTM Endovascular System, Boston Scientific). In arteries treated with atheroglitatide, there was substantial delivery of PGN into the superficial layers (5 µm from the lumen) of the arteries with and without ultrasound, [(1951.17 relative fluorescence units (RFU) vs. 1901.17 RFU; P-value = 0.939)]. With ultrasound activation there was increased penetration of PGN into the deeper arterial layers (up to 35 µm from the lumen) [(13195.25 RFU vs. 7681.00 RFU; P-value = 0.005)]. These pre-clinical data demonstrate ultrasound mediated therapeutic vascular delivery to deeper layers of the injured arterial wall. This model has the potential to reduce peri- stent restenosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melvin E Klegerman
- Department of Internal Medicine, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Melanie R Moody
- Department of Internal Medicine, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Shao-Ling Huang
- Department of Internal Medicine, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Tao Peng
- Department of Internal Medicine, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Susan T Laing
- Department of Internal Medicine, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Vijay Govindarajan
- Department of Internal Medicine, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Delia Danila
- Department of Internal Medicine, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Amirali Tahanan
- Department of Internal Medicine, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA
- Center for Clinical and Translational Sciences, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Mohammad H Rahbar
- Department of Internal Medicine, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA
- Center for Clinical and Translational Sciences, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Deborah Vela
- Cardiovascular Pathology Research Department, Texas Heart Institute, Houston, TX, USA
| | | | - Kevin J Haworth
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Cardiovascular Health and Disease, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Christy K Holland
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Cardiovascular Health and Disease, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - David D McPherson
- Department of Internal Medicine, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Patrick H Kee
- Department of Internal Medicine, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|