1
|
Haynes A, Loblay V. Rethinking Barriers and Enablers in Qualitative Health Research: Limitations, Alternatives, and Enhancements. QUALITATIVE HEALTH RESEARCH 2024:10497323241230890. [PMID: 38459909 DOI: 10.1177/10497323241230890] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/11/2024]
Abstract
Explorations of barriers and enablers (or barriers and facilitators) to a desired health practice, implementation process, or intervention outcome have become so prevalent that they seem to be a default in much health services and public health research. In this article, we argue that decisions to frame research questions or analyses using barriers and enablers (B&Es) should not be default. Contrary to the strengths of qualitative research, the B&Es approach often bypasses critical reflexivity and can lead to shallow research findings with poor understanding of the phenomena of interest. The B&Es approach is untheorised, relying on assumptions of linear, unidirectional processes, universally desirable outcomes, and binary thinking which are at odds with the rich understanding of context and complexity needed to respond to the challenges faced by health services and public health. We encourage researchers to develop research questions using informed deliberation that considers a range of approaches and their implications for producing meaningful knowledge. Alternatives and enhancements to the B&Es approach are explored, including using 'whole package' methodologies; theories, conceptual frameworks, and sensitising ideas; and participatory methods. We also consider ways of advancing existing research on B&Es rather than doing 'more of the same': researchers can usefully investigate how a barrier or enabler works in depth; develop and test implementation strategies for addressing B&Es; or synthesise the B&Es literature to develop a new model or theory. Illustrative examples from the literature are provided. We invite further discussion on this topic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abby Haynes
- Institute for Musculoskeletal Health, Sydney Musculoskeletal Health, The University of Sydney and Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Victoria Loblay
- Brain and Mind Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Pinto C, Geraghty AWA, McLoughlin C, Pagnini F, Yardley L, Dennison L. Experiences of psychological interventions in neurodegenerative diseases: a systematic review and thematic synthesis. Health Psychol Rev 2023; 17:416-438. [PMID: 35546326 DOI: 10.1080/17437199.2022.2073901] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2021] [Accepted: 05/01/2022] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
Background: Psychological interventions for managing emotional distress in neurodegenerative diseases are needed, but progressive worsening of symptoms and increasing disability might pose difficulties with engagement. We aimed to synthesise the experiences of engaging with and using psychological interventions in neurodegenerative diseases and identify relevant barriers and facilitators. Methods: Systematic searches were conducted in six electronic databases and results were screened. We included qualitative and mixed methods studies reporting patient or caregivers' views or experiences of psychological interventions. Qualitative data were extracted and thematically synthesised. Results: 34 papers were included, covering a range of diseases and interventions. Engagement was facilitated by flexible intervention formats and tailoring to the specific needs of people with neurodegenerative diseases. Interventions were sometimes inaccessible or burdensome because of physical and cognitive symptoms, and the time and effort required for the intervention. Participants' levels of acceptance and readiness often differed and influenced engagement with the intervention. Across different interventions, participants experienced wide-ranging benefits including changes in insight, perspective, self-efficacy, emotions and relationships. Conclusion: Although people with neurodegenerative diseases and caregivers experience benefits from psychological interventions, burden-reducing adaptations and sensitive tailoring to the specific disease context is required to improve acceptability and engagement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cathryn Pinto
- Department of Psychology, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Adam W A Geraghty
- Primary Care, Population Sciences and Medical Education, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | | | - Francesco Pagnini
- Department of Psychology, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Milan, Italy
- Department of Psychology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - Lucy Yardley
- Department of Psychology, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
- School of Psychological Science, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Laura Dennison
- Department of Psychology, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Conceptualization, use, and outcomes associated with compassion in the care of people with multiple sclerosis: a scoping review. J Neurol 2023; 270:1300-1322. [PMID: 36445508 PMCID: PMC9707147 DOI: 10.1007/s00415-022-11497-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2022] [Revised: 11/16/2022] [Accepted: 11/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Compassion is widely regarded as an important component of high-quality healthcare. However, its conceptualization, use, and associated outcomes in the care of people with multiple sclerosis (PwMS) have not been synthesized. The aim of this review is to scope the peer reviewed academic literature on the conceptualization, use, and outcomes associated with compassion in the care of PwMS. METHODS Studies were eligible for inclusion if reporting primary research data from quantitative, qualitative, or mixed-methods studies on the conceptualization, use, and outcomes associated with compassion in the care of PwMS. Relevant studies were identified through searching five electronic databases (CINAHL, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, MEDLINE, and PsycINFO) in January 2022. We followed the guidance outlined in the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) manual for evidence synthesis, and also referred to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses extension for Scoping Reviews Checklist (PRISMA-ScR). Simple descriptive methods were used to chart quantitative findings, and a descriptive approach with basic content analysis was employed to describe qualitative findings. RESULTS Fifteen studies were included (participant n = 1722): eight quantitative, six mixed-methods, one exclusively qualitative. Synthesized qualitative data revealed that PwMS conceptualize compassion as involving self-kindness, agency, and acceptance. PwMS report using self-compassion in response to unpleasant sensations and experiences. Quantitative findings suggest that compassion may mediate benefit finding, reduced distress, and improved quality of life (QoL) in PwMS, that those with the condition may become more compassionate through time, and that self-compassion specifically can be increased through training in mindfulness. In this context, greater self-compassion in PwMS correlates with less depression and fatigue, better resilience and QoL. Among studies, self-compassion was the most common outcome measure for PwMS. CONCLUSIONS A nascent literature exists on the conceptualization, use, and outcomes associated with compassion in the care of PwMS. Further research is required to better understand what compassion means to PwMS and those caring for them. However, self-compassion can be cultivated among PwMS and may be helpful for managing unpleasant somatic symptoms and in benefit finding. Impact on other health outcomes is less clear. The use of compassion by health care providers in the care of PwMS is unstudied.
Collapse
|
4
|
Ryk J, Simpson R, Hosseiny F, Notarianni M, Provencher MD, Rudnick A, Upshur R, Sud A. Virtually-delivered Sudarshan Kriya Yoga (SKY) for Canadian veterans with PTSD: A study protocol for a nation-wide effectiveness and implementation evaluation. PLoS One 2022; 17:e0275774. [PMID: 36288364 PMCID: PMC9605019 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0275774] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2022] [Accepted: 09/24/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) remains a significant treatment challenge among Canadian veterans. Currently accessible pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions for PTSD often do not lead to resolution of PTSD as a categorical diagnosis and have significant non-response rates. Sudarshan Kriya Yoga (SKY), a complementary and integrative health (CIH) intervention, can improve symptoms of PTSD. In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, this intervention has pivoted to virtual delivery and may be reaching new sets of participants who face multiple barriers to care. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the implementation and effectiveness of virtually delivered Sudarshan Kriya Yoga (SKY) on decreasing PTSD symptom severity, symptoms of depression, anxiety, and pain, and improving quality of life in Canadian veterans affected by PTSD. METHODS AND ANALYSIS Using a mixed-methods approach guided by the RE-AIM framework, we will conduct a hybrid type II effectiveness and implementation study of virtually delivered Sudarshan Kriya Yoga (SKY) for Canadian veterans. Effectiveness will be evaluated by comparing virtually delivered SKY to a waitlist control in a single-blinded (investigator and data analyst) randomized controlled trial (RCT). Change in PTSD symptoms (PCL-5) is the primary outcome and quality of life (SF-36), symptoms of depression (PHQ-9), anxiety (GAD-7), and pain (BPI) are secondary outcomes. The SKY intervention will be conducted over a 6-week period with assessments at baseline, 6-weeks, 12-weeks, and 30 weeks. The reach, effectiveness, adoption, implementation, and maintenance of the intervention will be evaluated through one-on-one semi-structured interviews with RCT participants, SKY instructors, health professionals, and administrators that work with veterans. DISCUSSION This is the first investigation of the virtual delivery of SKY for PTSD in veterans and aims to determine if the intervention is effective and implementable at scale.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Justin Ryk
- Bridgepoint Collaboratory, Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute, Sinai Health System, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Robert Simpson
- Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, University Hospital Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Fardous Hosseiny
- Atlas Institute for Veterans and Families, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
- University of Ottawa Institute of Mental Health Research at The Royal, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - MaryAnn Notarianni
- Atlas Institute for Veterans and Families, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
- University of Ottawa Institute of Mental Health Research at The Royal, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Martin D. Provencher
- École de Psychologie, Université Laval, Québec City, Québec, Canada
- Centre d’évaluations et d’interventions en santé mentale (CÉISM), Université Laval, Québec City, Québec, Canada
- VITAM and CERVO Research Centres, Québec City, Québec, Canada
| | - Abraham Rudnick
- Departments of Psychiatry and Bioethics and School of Occupational Therapy, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
- Nova Scotia Operational Stress Injury Clinic, Nova Scotia Health, Dartmouth, Nova Scotia, Canada
| | - Ross Upshur
- Bridgepoint Collaboratory, Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute, Sinai Health System, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Clinical Public Health, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Abhimanyu Sud
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, Temerty Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Humber River Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- * E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Haliwa I, Ford CG, Wilson JM, Shook NJ. A Mixed-Method Assessment of a 10-Day Mobile Mindfulness Intervention. Front Psychol 2021; 12:722995. [PMID: 34531801 PMCID: PMC8438152 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.722995] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2021] [Accepted: 08/02/2021] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Mobile mindfulness interventions represent a promising alternative to traditional in-person interventions that are resource demanding and have limited accessibility, preventing use by many populations. Despite greater accessibility and popularity of mobile mindfulness applications (apps), research is needed testing the effectiveness of brief interventions delivered via these platforms. The present study assessed the efficacy of a brief mobile mindfulness intervention compared to an active control for increasing state and trait mindfulness and improving mood, as well as the acceptability of the app, in a sample of undergraduate students. Participants (N=139; Mage=19.43years, 80.6% female, 83.5% White) were randomly assigned to either a 10-day mobile mindfulness (Headspace) or cognitive training (Peak) condition. Trait mindfulness was measured pre- and post-intervention. During the 10-day intervention, participants completed 10-min daily exercises on the assigned app, responded to daily questionnaires of state mindfulness and mood, and completed a daily written log of their reactions to the app exercises. Attrition was low (90% completion rate) and did not differ by condition. Participants in the mindfulness condition spent an average of 88.15min (SD=24.75) meditating out of the full 100min prescribed by the intervention. State mindfulness significantly increased across the 10-day intervention for participants in the mindfulness, but not the cognitive training, condition beginning around days 5 and 6. Some aspects of trait mindfulness increased and mood improved from pre- to post-intervention, but these changes were observed in both conditions (i.e., no significant differences were observed by condition). Qualitative analysis of open-ended reactions to the mindfulness app indicated that participants reported more likes than dislikes. Common themes for likes were that participants experienced feelings of calm and focus following the daily mindfulness exercises. Dislikes included discomfort and anxiety associated with increased awareness of thoughts and physical sensations. These findings suggest that while a brief mobile mindfulness intervention is acceptable to undergraduate college students and effective at increasing state mindfulness, a longer intervention may be needed in order to elicit corresponding changes in trait-level mindfulness or mood.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ilana Haliwa
- Department of Psychology, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, United States
| | - Cameron G Ford
- Department of Psychology, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, United States.,NOVA Behavioral Healthcare Corporation, Goldsboro, NC, United States
| | - Jenna M Wilson
- Department of Psychology, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, United States
| | - Natalie J Shook
- Department of Psychology, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, United States.,School of Nursing, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, United States
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Simpson R, Simpson S, Wasilewski M, Mercer S, Lawrence M. Mindfulness-based interventions for people with multiple sclerosis: a systematic review and meta-aggregation of qualitative research studies. Disabil Rehabil 2021; 44:6179-6193. [PMID: 34498997 DOI: 10.1080/09638288.2021.1964622] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Mindfulness-based interventions (MBIs) are effective treatments for stress, anxiety, and depression in PwMS. However, low adherence and high attrition may limit effectiveness. Qualitative research can provide important insights into MBI acceptability, accessibility, and implementation. This systematic review and meta-aggregation evaluated qualitative research findings on the use of MBIs for PwMS. METHODS Systematic searches were undertaken in six major electronic databases. Studies using qualitative or mixed methods were included. Two reviewers screened, data extracted, and critically appraised studies. Meta-aggregation was performed following the Joanna Briggs Institute approach, extracting findings, developing categories, and synthesizing findings. RESULTS Six eligible papers, including 136 PwMS were included in meta-aggregation. 136 findings were extracted, grouped into 17 categories, with four synthesized findings: (1) "accessing mindfulness," (2) "a sense of belonging," (3) "experiencing mindfulness," and (4) "making mindfulness more relevant and sustainable for PwMS." CONCLUSIONS MBIs for PwMS need to take into consideration disability which can limit accessibility. Online MBIs (synchronous and asynchronous) appear acceptable alternatives to traditional face-to-face courses. However, PwMS benefit from shared (mindful) experiencing and highlight MBI instructors as crucial in helping them understand and practice mindfulness. Involving PwMS in design, delivery, and iterative refinement would make MBIs more relevant to those taking part.IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATIONBoth face-to-face and online Mindfulness-based interventions (MBIs) appear acceptable to PwMS and, ideally, people should be offered a choice in training modality.PwMS derive benefit from undertaking MBIs with their peers, where a sense of camaraderie and belonging develop through shared (mindful) experiences.Instructors delivering MBIs for PwMS should be knowledgeable about the condition; participants describe how the instructor has a key role in helping them practice mindfulness effectively in the context of unpleasant experiences associated with MS.MBIs tailored for PwMS should include a pre-course orientation session, clearly articulate how mindfulness practices can help with MS, provide well-organized course materials in large font size, and deliver individual mindfulness practices flexibly depending on participant need.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert Simpson
- Division of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Canada.,Institute of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Scotland, UK
| | - Sharon Simpson
- Institute of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Scotland, UK
| | - Marina Wasilewski
- Division of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Canada
| | | | - Maggie Lawrence
- School of Health and Life Sciences, Glasgow Caledonian University, Scotland, UK
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
A feasibility trial of a digital mindfulness-based intervention to improve asthma-related quality of life for primary care patients with asthma. J Behav Med 2021; 45:133-147. [PMID: 34448986 PMCID: PMC8818629 DOI: 10.1007/s10865-021-00249-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/05/2021] [Accepted: 07/20/2021] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
Asthma outcomes remain suboptimal, despite effective pharmacotherapy. Psychological dysfunction (such as anxiety) is common, and associated with poorer outcomes. We evaluated a digital mindfulness programme as an intervention to improve asthma-related quality of life for primary care patients, in a prospectively registered randomized-controlled feasibility study. We offered ‘Headspace’, a widely-used digital mindfulness intervention, to adults with asthma through 16 UK GP practices. Participants were randomized on a 2:1 basis to the mindfulness intervention, or waitlist control. Participants completed questionnaires (including asthma symptom control, asthma-related quality of life, anxiety, depression) at baseline, 6-week and 3-month follow-up. 116 participants completed primary outcomes at 3-month follow-up: intervention 73 (79%), control 43 (84%). Compared to baseline, the intervention group but not the control group reported significantly improved asthma-related quality of life, with a between-group difference favoring the intervention group that was not significant (Mean difference = 0.15, 95%CI − 0.13 to 0.42). Intervention use varied (ranging from 0 to 192 times) but was generally high. Digital mindfulness interventions are feasible and acceptable adjunct treatments for mild and moderate asthma to target quality of life. Further research should adapt ‘generic’ mindfulness-based stress-reduction to maximize effectiveness for asthma, and validate our findings in a fully-powered randomized controlled trial. Trial registration Prospectively registered: ISRCTN52212323.
Collapse
|
8
|
Finlay KA, Hearn JH, Chater A. Grieving a disrupted biography: an interpretative phenomenological analysis exploring barriers to the use of mindfulness after neurological injury or impairment. BMC Psychol 2021; 9:124. [PMID: 34429164 PMCID: PMC8386048 DOI: 10.1186/s40359-021-00628-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2020] [Accepted: 08/11/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Mindfulness has demonstrated strong utility for enhancing self-management and health outcomes in chronic illness. However, sensation-focused mindfulness techniques may not be appropriate for clinical populations with neurological injury. This study aimed to identify how expert mindfulness teachers with sensory loss/impairment naturalistically adapt and experience mindfulness. We aimed to highlight the rationale for and barriers to mindfulness practice when living with sensory loss. METHODS A qualitative, semi-structured interview design was used, analysed via Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis (IPA). Eight (5 females, 3 males) mindfulness teachers with neurological injury were recruited via a national registry of Mindfulness for Health teachers. Interviews (range: 50-93 min) were completed, transcribed verbatim and analysed idiographically for descriptive, linguistic and conceptual themes, before a cross-case analysis was completed. RESULTS Two superordinate themes were identified: (1) Overcoming a disrupted biography; and (2) Proactive self-management. These themes considered the challenge of reconciling, through grief, a past health status with the present reality of living with sensory loss due to Spinal Cord Injury, Multiple Sclerosis or Functional Neurological Disorder. Mindfulness was experienced as a method by which proactive choices could be made to maintain control and autonomy in health, reducing perceptions of suffering, psychological distress, cognitive reactivity and rumination. CONCLUSIONS Mindfulness was found to support the self-management of health after neurological injury/impairment. Mindfulness meditation presented an initial challenge as trauma and grief processes were (re-)activated during mindfulness sessions. However, mindfulness was found to support the resolution of these grief processes and encourage adaptive approach-based coping and acceptance of health and neurological impairment/injury.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K. A. Finlay
- School of Psychology and Clinical Language Sciences, University of Reading, Reading, Berks, RG6 7BE UK
| | - J. H. Hearn
- Department of Psychology, Manchester Metropolitan University, Brooks Building, 53 Bonsall Street, Manchester, M15 6GX UK
| | - A. Chater
- Institute for Sport and Physical Activity Research (ISPAR), Centre for Health, Wellbeing and Behaviour Change, University of Bedfordshire, Polhill Avenue
, Bedford, MK41 9EA UK
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Stewart C, Gallacher K, Nakham A, Cruickshank M, Newlands R, Bond C, Myint PK, Bhattacharya D, Mair FS. Barriers and facilitators to reducing anticholinergic burden: a qualitative systematic review. Int J Clin Pharm 2021; 43:1451-1460. [PMID: 34173123 PMCID: PMC8642323 DOI: 10.1007/s11096-021-01293-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/22/2020] [Accepted: 05/29/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Background Despite common use, anticholinergic medications have been associated with serious health risks. Interventions to reduce their use are being developed and there is a need to understand their implementation into clinical care. Aim of review This systematic review aims to identify and analyse qualitative research studies exploring the barriers and facilitators to reducing anticholinergic burden. Methods Medline (OVID), EMBASE (OVID), CINAHL (EMBSCO) and PsycINFO (OVID) were searched using comprehensive search terms. Peer reviewed studies published in English presenting qualitative research in relation to the barriers and facilitators of deprescribing anticholinergic medications, involving patients, carers or health professionals were eligible. Normalization Process Theory was used to explore and explain the data. Results Of 1764 identified studies, two were eligible and both involved healthcare professionals (23 general practitioners, 13 specialist clinicians and 12 pharmacists). No studies were identified that involved patients or carers. Barriers to collaborative working often resulted in poor motivation to reduce anticholinergic use. Low confidence, system resources and organisation of care also hindered anticholinergic burden reduction. Good communication and relationships with patients, carers and other healthcare professionals were reported as important for successful anticholinergic burden reduction. Having a named person for prescribing decisions, and clear role boundaries, were also important facilitators. Conclusions This review identified important barriers and facilitators to anticholinergic burden reduction from healthcare provider perspectives which can inform implementation of such deprescribing interventions. Studies exploring patient and carer perspectives are presently absent but are required to ensure person-centeredness and feasibility of future interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carrie Stewart
- Ageing Clinical and Experimental Research (ACER) Team, Institute of Applied Health Sciences, University of Aberdeen, 1:128, Polwarth Building, Foresterhill Health Campus, Aberdeen, AB25 2ZD, UK.
| | - Katie Gallacher
- General Practice and Primary Care, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Athagran Nakham
- Ageing Clinical and Experimental Research (ACER) Team, Institute of Applied Health Sciences, University of Aberdeen, 1:128, Polwarth Building, Foresterhill Health Campus, Aberdeen, AB25 2ZD, UK
| | - Moira Cruickshank
- Health Services Research Unit, Institute of Applied Health Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Rumana Newlands
- Health Services Research Unit, Institute of Applied Health Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Christine Bond
- Primary Care, Institute of Applied Health Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Phyo Kyaw Myint
- Ageing Clinical and Experimental Research (ACER) Team, Institute of Applied Health Sciences, University of Aberdeen, 1:128, Polwarth Building, Foresterhill Health Campus, Aberdeen, AB25 2ZD, UK
| | | | - Frances S Mair
- General Practice and Primary Care, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Dunne J, Chih HJ, Begley A, Daly A, Gerlach R, Schütze R, Castell E, Byrne J, Black LJ. A randomised controlled trial to test the feasibility of online mindfulness programs for people with multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler Relat Disord 2020; 48:102728. [PMID: 33477003 DOI: 10.1016/j.msard.2020.102728] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/12/2020] [Revised: 11/23/2020] [Accepted: 12/27/2020] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Practicing mindfulness may improve mental health and reduce pain in people with multiple sclerosis (MS). Since participating in face-to-face mindfulness programs can be challenging for people with MS, exploring alternative ways of delivering these programs is necessary. The objective of this trial was to assess feasibility of two different eight-week online mindfulness programs across five domains: recruitment, practicality, acceptability, integration of mindfulness practice, and limited efficacy testing on mental health, quality of life and pain. METHODS In a three-arm randomised controlled mixed-method trial, participants were assigned to: 1) Mindfulness for Multiple Sclerosis (M4MS) (n=18); 2) Chair Yoga (n=18); or 3) wait-list control group (n=19) for eight weeks. Daily home practice diaries and weekly reflective journals were collected along with online questionnaires at baseline and post-intervention. Feasibility was assessed using descriptive statistics, multilevel mixed-effects regression, and content analysis. RESULTS Online recruitment, online program delivery and online data collection were all found to be feasible. The sign up rate was 65% and overall, 87% of the participant completed the eight-week online programs. The programs were perceived as practical and acceptable by the participants. Integration of mindfulness practice into daily life varied, with time and fatigue reported as common barriers to practice. No statistically significant differences in efficacy measures were found among groups (p>0.05). CONCLUSION Online mindfulness programs are feasible and acceptable for people with MS. This study provides useful insights for future trials when designing online mindfulness programs for people with MS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer Dunne
- School of Public Health, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Hui Jun Chih
- School of Public Health, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.
| | - Andrea Begley
- School of Public Health, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Alison Daly
- School of Public Health, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | | | - Robert Schütze
- School of Physiotherapy and Exercise Sciences, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Emily Castell
- School of Psychology, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Jean Byrne
- Wisdom Yoga Institute, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Lucinda J Black
- School of Public Health, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Holmes JA, Logan P, Morris R, Radford K. Factors affecting the delivery of complex rehabilitation interventions in research with neurologically impaired adults: a systematic review. Syst Rev 2020; 9:268. [PMID: 33239081 PMCID: PMC7690089 DOI: 10.1186/s13643-020-01508-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2019] [Accepted: 10/22/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Rehabilitation research does not always improve patient outcomes because of difficulties implementing complex health interventions. Identifying barriers and facilitators to implementation fidelity is critical. Not reporting implementation issues wastes research resources and risks erroneously attributing effectiveness when interventions are not implemented as planned, particularly progressing from single to multicentre trials. The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) and Conceptual Framework for Implementation Fidelity (CFIF) facilitate identification of barriers and facilitators. This review sought to identify barriers and facilitators (determinants) affecting implementation in trials of complex rehabilitation interventions for adults with long-term neurological conditions (LTNC) and describe implementation issues. METHODS Implementation, complex health interventions and LTNC search terms were developed. Studies of all designs were eligible. Searches involved 11 databases, trial registries and citations. After screening titles and abstracts, two reviewers independently shortlisted studies. A third resolved discrepancies. One reviewer extracted data in two stages; 1) descriptive study data, 2) units of text describing determinants. Data were synthesised by (1) mapping determinants to CFIF and CFIR and (2) thematic analysis. RESULTS Forty-three studies, from 7434 records, reported implementation determinants; 41 reported both barriers and facilitators. Most implied determinants but five used implementation theory to inform recording. More barriers than facilitators were mapped onto CFIF and CFIR constructs. "Patient needs and resources", "readiness for implementation", "knowledge and beliefs about the intervention", "facilitation strategies", "participant responsiveness" were the most frequently mapped constructs. Constructs relating to the quality of intervention delivery, organisational/contextual aspects and trial-related issues were rarely tapped. Thematic analysis revealed the most frequently reported determinants related to adherence, intervention perceptions and attrition. CONCLUSIONS This review has described the barriers and facilitators identified in studies implementing complex interventions for people with LTNCs. Early adoption of implementation frameworks by trialists can simplify identification and reporting of factors affecting delivery of new complex rehabilitation interventions. It is vital to learn from previous experiences to prevent unnecessary repetitions of implementation failure at both trial and service provision levels. Reported facilitators can provide strategies for overcoming implementation issues. Reporting gaps may be due to the lack of standardised reporting methods, researcher ignorance and historical reporting requirements. SYSTEMIC REVIEW REGISTRATION PROSPERO CRD42015020423.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jain Anne Holmes
- Division of Rehabilitation, Ageing and Wellbeing, School of Medicine, Univeristy of Nottingham, Nottingham, NG7 2UH UK
| | - Philippa Logan
- Division of Rehabilitation, Ageing and Wellbeing, School of Medicine, Univeristy of Nottingham, Nottingham, NG7 2UH UK
| | - Richard Morris
- Division of Rehabilitation, Ageing and Wellbeing, School of Medicine, Univeristy of Nottingham, Nottingham, NG7 2UH UK
| | - Kathryn Radford
- Division of Rehabilitation, Ageing and Wellbeing, School of Medicine, Univeristy of Nottingham, Nottingham, NG7 2UH UK
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Scobbie L, Duncan EAS, Brady MC, Thomson K, Wyke S. Facilitators and "deal breakers": a mixed methods study investigating implementation of the Goal setting and action planning (G-AP) framework in community rehabilitation teams. BMC Health Serv Res 2020; 20:791. [PMID: 32843039 PMCID: PMC7447562 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-020-05651-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2020] [Accepted: 08/13/2020] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND High quality goal setting in stroke rehabilitation is vital, but challenging to deliver. The G-AP framework (including staff training and a stroke survivor held G-AP record) guides patient centred goal setting with stroke survivors in community rehabilitation teams. We found G-AP was acceptable, feasible to deliver and clinically useful in one team. The aim of this study was to conduct a mixed methods investigation of G-AP implementation in diverse community teams prior to a large-scale evaluation. METHODS We approached Scottish community rehabilitation teams to take part. Following training, G-AP was delivered to stroke survivors within participating teams for 6 months. We investigated staff experiences of G-AP training and its implementation using focus groups and a training questionnaire. We investigated fidelity of G-AP delivery through case note review. Focus group data were analysed using a Framework approach; identified themes were mapped into Normalisation Process Theory constructs. Questionnaire and case note data were analysed descriptively. RESULTS We recruited three teams comprising 55 rehabilitation staff. Almost all staff (93%, 51/55) participated in G-AP training; of those, 80% (n = 41/51) completed the training questionnaire. Training was rated as 'good' or 'very good' by almost all staff (92%, n = 37/41). G-AP was broadly implemented as intended in two teams. Implementation facilitators included - G-AP 'made sense'; repetitive use of G-AP in practice; flexible G-AP delivery and positive staff appraisals of G-AP impact. G-AP failed to gain traction in the third team. Implementation barriers included - delays between G-AP training and implementation; limited leadership engagement; a poor 'fit' between G-AP and the team organisational structure and simultaneous delivery of other goal setting methods. Staff recommended (i) development of training to include implementation planning; (ii) ongoing local implementation review and tailoring, and (iii) development of electronic and aphasia friendly G-AP records. CONCLUSIONS The interaction between G-AP and the practice setting is critical to implementation success or failure. Whilst facilitators support implementation success, barriers can collectively act as implementation "deal breakers". Local G-AP implementation efforts should be planned, monitored and tailored. These insights can inform implementation of other complex interventions in community rehabilitation settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lesley Scobbie
- Nursing, Midwifery and Allied Health Profession Research Unit, Govan Mbeki Building, Glasgow Caledonian University, Cowcaddens Road, Glasgow, G4 OBA, Scotland
- Nursing, Midwifery and Allied Health Professions Research Unit, Unit 13 Scion House, University of Stirling Innovation Park, Stirling, FK9 4NF Scotland
| | - Edward A. S. Duncan
- Nursing, Midwifery and Allied Health Professions Research Unit, Unit 13 Scion House, University of Stirling Innovation Park, Stirling, FK9 4NF Scotland
| | - Marian C. Brady
- Nursing, Midwifery and Allied Health Profession Research Unit, Govan Mbeki Building, Glasgow Caledonian University, Cowcaddens Road, Glasgow, G4 OBA, Scotland
| | - Katie Thomson
- Nursing, Midwifery and Allied Health Profession Research Unit, Govan Mbeki Building, Glasgow Caledonian University, Cowcaddens Road, Glasgow, G4 OBA, Scotland
| | - Sally Wyke
- Institute of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, 1 Lilybank Gardens, Glasgow, G12 8R2 Scotland
| |
Collapse
|