Thrombolysis After Dabigatran Reversal for Acute Ischemic Stroke: A National Registry-Based Study and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Limited data exist on the safety of IV thrombolysis (IVT) for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) after dabigatran reversal with idarucizumab. We sought to evaluate the safety and efficacy of idarucizumab pretreatment in patients with AIS receiving IVT.

METHODS

A national registry-based study evaluated the safety and efficacy of IVT in this specific subgroup. We also conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies and case series, aiming to document the pooled rates of (1) symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH), (2) any intracranial hemorrhage, (3) 3-month mortality, and (4) the proportion of excellent (modified Rankin Scale [mRS] scores 0-1) and (5) good (mRS scores 0-2) functional outcome at 3 months among patients with AIS, who received IVT after dabigatran reversal with idarucizumab. Moreover, we sought to compare these outcomes between IVT-treated patients after dabigatran reversal with idarucizumab and IVT-treated patients without dabigatran pretreatment.

RESULTS

Thirteen cohorts including our nation-wide registry-based cohort and 1 case series comprising 553 patients with AIS (mean age: 75 years; male sex: 65%; median baseline NIH Stroke Scale score: 11 points) receiving idarucizumab before IVT were included in this meta-analysis. The pooled rate of sICH after IVT after idarucizumab administration was 4% (95% CI 1-9; I2 = 26%), while the pooled rates of any intracranial hemorrhage and 3-month mortality were 10% (95% CI 5-16; I2 = 24%) and 18% (95% CI 10-27; I2 = 0%), respectively. The pooled rates of excellent and good functional outcomes at 3 months were 56% (95% CI 27-83; I2 = 69%) and 70% (95% CI 57-81; I2 = 40%), respectively. The risk of sICH (risk ratio [RR] 1.86; 95% CI 0.91-3.80; I2 = 0%), any intracranial hemorrhage (RR 1.76; 95% CI 0.99-3.11; I2 = 8%), and 3-month mortality (RR 1.50; 95% CI 0.91-2.48; I2 = 0%) did not differ between patients with AIS receiving IVT with and without idarucizumab. Moreover, idarucizumab administration was associated with higher likelihood of achieving a 3-month good functional outcome (RR 1.35; 95% CI 1.11-1.65; I2 = 27%).

DISCUSSION

IVT for AIS after dabigatran reversal with idarucizumab seems to be safe and effective in observational studies with limited number of patients. Randomized-controlled clinical trials are warranted to provide robust evidence on the safety and efficacy of IVT in this specific AIS subgroup.

Assessing mortality and safety of IV thrombolysis in ischemic stroke patients on direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs): A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) is considered a standard reperfusion therapy for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients presenting within 4.5 hours of the last known well (LKW). Current guidelines contraindicate the use of IVT in patients within the window who are on Direct Oral Anticoagulants (DOACs) and took their last dose within 48 hours of presentation, due to a risk of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH).

OBJECTIVE

To assess the safety of IVT as management of AIS in patients who take DOACs.

METHODS

A thorough literature search of four databases (PubMed, Scopus, Medline, Google Scholar, Web of science and ScienceDirect) was done from inception until May 2023. Double-arm studies that reported outcomes of mortality, sICH, and mRS scores were selected. Results from these studies were presented as odds ratios (ORs) with 95 % confidence intervals (CIs) and were pooled using a random-effects model.

RESULTS

Four eligible studies were included with a total of 238,425 stroke patients who underwent IVT (3330 in the DOAC arm and 235,217 in the placebo arm). The group with prior DOAC intake showed a significant decrease in sICH development and an increase in functional independence at 90 days compared to the control group. No significant association was seen between prior DOAC use and any serious alteplase-related complication within 36 hours, serious systemic or life-threatening hemorrhage within 36 hours, mortality within 3 months, or mRS score at 3 months.

CONCLUSION

The pooled analysis suggests that IVT is a safe management option for acute ischemic stroke in patients with DOAC intake before symptom onset without an increased risk of serious adverse events.

Intravenous Thrombolysis in Patients With Ischemic Stroke and Recent Ingestion of Direct Oral Anticoagulants

Importance

International guidelines recommend avoiding intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) in patients with ischemic stroke who have a recent intake of a direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC).

Objective

To determine the risk of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) associated with use of IVT in patients with recent DOAC ingestion.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This international, multicenter, retrospective cohort study included 64 primary and comprehensive stroke centers across Europe, Asia, Australia, and New Zealand. Consecutive adult patients with ischemic stroke who received IVT (both with and without thrombectomy) were included. Patients whose last known DOAC ingestion was more than 48 hours before stroke onset were excluded. A total of 832 patients with recent DOAC use were compared with 32 375 controls without recent DOAC use. Data were collected from January 2008 to December 2021.

Exposures

Prior DOAC therapy (confirmed last ingestion within 48 hours prior to IVT) compared with no prior oral anticoagulation.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The main outcome was sICH within 36 hours after IVT, defined as worsening of at least 4 points on the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale and attributed to radiologically evident intracranial hemorrhage. Outcomes were compared according to different selection strategies (DOAC-level measurements, DOAC reversal treatment, IVT with neither DOAC-level measurement nor idarucizumab). The association of sICH with DOAC plasma levels and very recent ingestions was explored in sensitivity analyses.

Results

Of 33 207 included patients, 14 458 (43.5%) were female, and the median (IQR) age was 73 (62-80) years. The median (IQR) National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score was 9 (5-16). Of the 832 patients taking DOAC, 252 (30.3%) received DOAC reversal before IVT (all idarucizumab), 225 (27.0%) had DOAC-level measurements, and 355 (42.7%) received IVT without measuring DOAC plasma levels or reversal treatment. The unadjusted rate of sICH was 2.5% (95% CI, 1.6-3.8) in patients taking DOACs compared with 4.1% (95% CI, 3.9-4.4) in control patients using no anticoagulants. Recent DOAC ingestion was associated with lower odds of sICH after IVT compared with no anticoagulation (adjusted odds ratio, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.36-0.92). This finding was consistent among the different selection strategies and in sensitivity analyses of patients with detectable plasma levels or very recent ingestion.

Conclusions and Relevance

In this study, there was insufficient evidence of excess harm associated with off-label IVT in selected patients after ischemic stroke with recent DOAC ingestion.

Thrombolysis after dabigatran reversal: A nation-wide Italian multicentre study, systematic review and meta-analysis

Introduction:

Recent anticoagulant intake represents a contraindication for thrombolysis in acute ischemic stroke. Idarucizumab reverses the anticoagulant effect of dabigatran, potentially allowing for thrombolysis. This nation-wide observational cohort study, systematic review, and meta-analysis evaluated the efficacy and safety of thrombolysis preceded by dabigatran-reversal in people with acute ischemic stroke.

Patients and methods:

We recruited people undergoing thrombolysis following dabigatran-reversal at 17 stroke centers in Italy (reversal-group), people on dabigatran treated with thrombolysis without reversal (no-reversal group), and age, sex, hypertension, stroke severity, and reperfusion treatment-matched controls in 1:7 ratio (control-group). We compared groups for symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH, main outcome), any brain hemorrhage, good functional outcome (mRS 0–2 at 3 months), and death. The systematic review followed a predefined protocol (CRD42017060274), and odds ratio (OR) meta-analysis was implemented to compare groups.

Results:

Thirty-nine patients in dabigatran-reversal group and 300 matched controls were included. Reversal was associated with a non-significant increase in sICH (10.3% vs 6%, aOR = 1.32, 95% CI = 0.39–4.52), death (17.9% vs 10%, aOR = 0.77, 95% CI = 0.12–4.93) and good functional outcome (64.1% vs 52.8%, aOR = 1.41, 95% CI = 0.63–3.19). No hemorrhagic events or deaths were registered in no-reversal group (n = 12). Pooling data from 3 studies after systematic review (n = 1879), reversal carried a non-significant trend for sICH (OR = 1.53, 95% CI = 0.67–3.50), death (OR = 1.53, 95% CI = 0.73–3.24) and good functional outcome (OR = 2.46, 95% CI = 0.85–7.16).

Discussion and conclusion:

People treated with reperfusion strategies after dabigatran reversal with idarucizumab seem to have a marginal increase in the risk of sICH but comparable functional recovery to matched patients with stroke. Further studies are needed to define treatment cost-effectiveness and potential thresholds in plasma dabigatran concentration for reversal.

Ischemic stroke in oral anticoagulated patients with atrial fibrillation

BACKGROUND

Ischemic strokes in orally anticoagulated patients pose challenges for acute management and secondary prevention but the characteristics of these strokes are poorly understood. We examined the clinical and imaging features, the presumed underlying etiology and the subsequent antithrombotic management.

METHODS

We analyzed a consecutive series of patients enrolled into the EIDASAF study, a single center, observational study of ischemic stroke patients with a diagnosis atrial fibrillation (AF) prior to the index event who had been admitted to the Hyperacute Stroke Unit of Imperial College London between 2010 and 2017. We compared patients with oral anticoagulation therapy prior admission (OAC_prior ) with those without anticoagulation (OAC_naive ). Brain imaging was analyzed centrally.

RESULTS

763 patients were included in the analysis. 481 (63%) were OAC_naive while 282 (37%) were OAC_prior . Patients with OAC_prior were younger, more often had a previous history of stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA), and more often suffered from hypertension and diabetes. In OAC_naive, patients, large and deep middle cerebral artery infarcts occurred more often than in OAC_prior patients. The groups differed significantly in the distribution of competing etiologies underlying their stroke. At discharge, OAC_prior more frequently were (re)-anticoagulated compared to OAC_naive patients. Within the OAC_prior group, patients with recurrent strokes did not differ from those with a first stroke regarding clinical characteristics and pattern of cerebral infarction but they were less frequently anticoagulated.

CONCLUSIONS

Ischemic strokes on OAC represent a significant proportion of AF-related strokes. There is an unmet need to better understand the causes underlying these strokes and to optimize the medical management.

Dabigatran Reversal With Idarucizumab and In-Hospital Mortality in Intracranial Hemorrhage: A Systematic Review of Real-Life Data From Case Reports and Case Series

Background: Intracranial hemorrhage is a severe and possibly fatal consequence of anticoagulation therapy. Idarucizumab is used in dabigatran-treated patients suffering from intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) to reverse the anticoagulant effect of dabigatran. Systematic review of real-life mortality in these patients is missing. Objectives: A review of all published dabigatran-related ICH cases treated with idarucizumab was performed. We aimed to estimate in-hospital mortality rate in these patients. Method: We searched PubMed and Scopus for all published cases of ICH in idarucizumab/dabigatran-treated patients until May 15, 2021. The assessed outcome was in-hospital mortality. Results: We identified six eligible studies (case series) with 386 patients and 54 single case reports. In-hospital mortality rate was 11.4% in the case series and 9.7% in the case reports. Conclusions: Our analysis provides clinically relevant quantitative data regarding in-hospital mortality in idarucizumab/dabigatran-treated patients with ICH, which is estimated to be 9.7-11.4%.

Management of stroke in patients on antithrombotic therapy: Practical issues in the era of direct oral anticoagulants

Antithrombotic drugs (ADs) are the mainstay of secondary prevention of thrombotic vascular diseases. Management of patients under long-term treatment with ADs admitted for acute cerebrovascular disease, either ischemic stroke (IS) or intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH), has become a frequent situation that might influence decision-making processes from diagnosis to therapeutic strategies. The aim of this review is to summarize current data from the literature to help clinicians in their decisions for stroke care in patients taking ADs. While a large body of data have made it possible to codify the management of patients presenting IS or ICH under antiplatelet drugs and vitamin K antagonists, the increasing use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOAs) and future development of new antiplatelet drugs raise new problems. Development of rapid assessment tools measuring specific biological activity and reversion agents dedicated to each class of DOAs should make it possible to optimize individual therapeutic strategies. This review highlights the main steps of IS and ICH management from early identification of ADs, and use of dedicated biological assays, to the stepwise strategy to apply revascularization or reversal therapies and finally the resumption of ADs with a focus on individual clinical and radiological characteristics for more personalized care.

Intravenous Thrombolysis After Dabigatran Reversal by Idarucizumab: A Systematic Review of the Literature

Background and Purpose: Idarucizumab achieves instant reversal of anticoagulation and enables intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) in dabigatran-treated acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients. AIS in dabigatran-treated patients is a rare event, therefore the experience is limited. A review of all published cases was performed to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of this therapeutic strategy. Methods: We searched PubMed and Scopus for all published cases of IVT after reversal with idarucizumab in dabigatran-treated AIS patients. The outcomes were safety assessed by hemorhagic transformation (HT), symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (SICH) and death, and efficacy assessed by National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) reduction. Results: We identified 251 AIS patients (39,9% females) with an average age of 74 years. HT, SICH, and death were reported in 19 (7.6%), 9 (3.6%), and 21 (8.4%) patients, respectively. Patients experiencing HT presented with more severe strokes (median NIHSS on admission: 21 vs. 8, p < 0.001; OR: 1.12, 95% CI: 1.05-1.20). After IVT there was a significant NIHSS reduction of 6 points (IQR:3-10, p < 0.001) post-stroke and linear regression revealed a correlation of admission NIHSS to NIHSS reduction (p < 0.001). Conclusions: In this systematic review of all published cases of IVT in dabigatran-treated AIS patients after reversal with idarucizumab the rates of HT, SICH and mortality, as well as NIHSS reduction, were comparable with previous studies in non-anticoagulated patients. This provides reassuring evidence about the safety and efficacy of this therapeutic strategy.

Idarucizumab Reversal of Dabigatran in Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke and Intracranial Hemorrhage: Comparison with Non-idarucizumab-Treated Patients

BACKGROUND

Idarucizumab reverses the anticoagulant dabigatran; it is recommended during intravenous thrombolysis treatment of dabigatran-treated patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) and in dabigatran-treated patients with intracranial hemorrhage (ICH).

METHODS

Outcomes of consecutive idarucizumab/dabigatran-treated patients with intravenous thrombolysis-treated AIS (n = 22) were compared with consecutive similar intravenous thrombolysis-treated patients with AIS who were not anticoagulated (n = 182) [primary aim]; idarucizumab/dabigatran-treated patients with ICH (n = 13) were compared with patients with ICH who received the anticoagulants rivaroxaban or apixaban (n = 24) [secondary aim]. Efficacy was estimated by National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score changes between admission and discharge and by the modified Rankin score after 3 months; safety was assessed by symptomatic ICH and mortality.

RESULTS

Basal neurological impairment was similar in both idarucizumab/dabigatran-treated and control groups of patients with AIS and ICH. The idarucizumab/dabigatran-treated patients with AIS with subsequent intravenous thrombolysis showed a mean National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale improvement of 84% vs 68% in the control group (p < 0.05). A favorable outcome (modified Rankin score ≤ 2 after 3 months) was achieved significantly more frequently than in the control group (86% vs 57%; p < 0.05). The complication rate was similar in both groups. In patients with ICH, a positive functional outcome (modified Rankin score ≤ 3 after 3 months) was achieved more often in the idarucizumab/dabigatran-treated group than in the control group (70% vs 42%; p = 0.109). The complication rate was similar.

CONCLUSIONS

Idarucizumab use in dabigatran-treated patients with AIS resulted in significantly more efficacious intravenous thrombolysis treatment and a non-significantly better outcome in dabigatran-treated patients with ICH compared with controls. There was no difference regarding complications.

Revascularization outcomes following acute ischemic stroke in patients taking direct oral anticoagulants: a single hospital cohort study

Successful revascularization therapy is of paramount importance in patients suffering acute ischemic stroke (AIS). However, there is currently only limited evidence on revascularization outcomes for patients suffering AIS while treated with direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs). The aim of our study was to determine the efficacy and safety of intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) and mechanical reperfusion (MeR) in AIS patients taking DOACs, and compare them to randomized clinical trials (RCTs), which included patients without DOAC treatment. In an observational cohort study, we analyzed clinical and radiological outcomes following AIS for all consecutive patients on DOAC therapy treated by IVT or MeR, between 2013 and 2019, at the University Medical Center Ljubljana. Patients in the IVT group were on dabigatran treatment and have received idarucizumab as a reversal agent prior to IVT. Patients in the MeR group had a large vessel occlusion. The primary outcome of the study was efficiency, defined as significant improvement after recanalization (National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score improvement of ≥8 points after 24 h and modified Rankin Scale (mRS) ≤2 after 3 months) and safety, defined as occurrence of symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (SICH) and mortality. Fifty-one DOAC-treated patients with AIS were included. Nineteen dabigatran-treated patients received IVT after reversal by idarucizumab. Thirty-two patients with a large vessel occlusion (12 on dabigatran, 12 on rivaroxaban, and 8 on apixaban) received MeR. Median NIHSS at admission was 9 in the IVT group and 17 in the MeR group. A significant clinical improvement, 24 h after revascularization (median improvement of NIHSS ≥8), occurred in 84% of patients treated with IVT and 25% of patients treated with MeR. A favorable functional outcome after 3 months (modified Rankin Scale (mRS) ≤2) occurred in 84 % of patients treated with IVT and 44% of patients treated with MeR. SICH occurred in one patient (5%) in the IVT group, and in two patients (6%) in the MeR group. In summary, in our observational study of DOAC-treated AIS patients, the level of IVT efficiency was substantially better than in the RCTs. At the same time, the results of MeR treatment were on the same level as in non-DOAC AIS patients included in the RCTs. The observed safety of IVT and MeR treatment was similar to the RCTs. We propose that thrombi in patients on dabigatran may have increased susceptibility to IVT, thereby allowing for better clinical results.

Successful dabigatran reversal after subdural hemorrhage using idarucizumab in a mobile stroke unit: A case report

RATIONALE

Idarucizumab is a specific reversal agent for patients with bleeding related to the anticoagulant dabigatran. There are no prior descriptions of Idarucizumab administration in the prehospital setting for intracranial hemorrhage.

PATIENT CONCERNS

An 82-year-old woman treated with dabigatran for atrial fibrillation developed acute focal weakness. This led to activation of emergency medical services and assessment in the mobile stroke unit (MSU).

DIAGNOSIS

Computed tomography of the brain performed in the MSU revealed an acute subdural hematoma.

INTERVENTIONS

The patient was treated with Idarucizumab in the MSU.

OUTCOMES

The subdural hematoma was treated with a burr hole evacuation and the patient was discharged to a rehabilitation facility without residual focal neurological deficits.

LESSONS

Idarucizumab can be used safely and effectively to treat dabigatran-associated intracranial hemorrhage in the prehospital setting.

Antagonizing dabigatran by idarucizumab in cases of ischemic stroke or intracranial hemorrhage in Germany-Updated series of 120 cases

BACKGROUND

Idarucizumab is a monoclonal antibody fragment with high affinity for dabigatran reversing its anticoagulant effects within minutes. Thereby, patients with acute ischemic stroke who are on dabigatran treatment may become eligible for thrombolysis with recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator (rt-PA). In patients on dabigatran with intracerebral hemorrhage idarucizumab could prevent lesion growth.

AIMS

To provide insights into the clinical use of idarucizumab in patients under effective dabigatran anticoagulation presenting with signs of acute ischemic stroke or intracranial hemorrhage.

METHODS

Retrospective data collected from German neurological/neurosurgical departments administering idarucizumab following product launch from January 2016 to August 2018 were used.

RESULTS

One-hundred and twenty stroke patients received idarucizumab in 61 stroke centers. Eighty patients treated with dabigatran presented with ischemic stroke and 40 patients suffered intracranial bleeding (intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) in n = 27). In patients receiving intravenous thrombolysis with rt-PA following idarucizumab, 78% showed a median improvement of 7 points in National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale. No bleeding complications were reported. Hematoma growth was observed in 3 out of 27 patients with ICH. Outcome was favorable with a median National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale improvement of 4 points and modified Rankin score 0-3 in 61%. Six out of 40 individuals (15%) with intracranial bleeding died during hospital stay.

CONCLUSION

Administration of rt-PA after reversal of dabigatran activity with idarucizumab in case of acute ischemic stroke seems feasible, effective, and safe. In dabigatran-associated intracranial hemorrhage, idarucizumab appears to prevent hematoma growth and to improve outcome.

Ischaemic stroke and transient ischaemic attack on anticoagulants: outcomes in the era of direct oral anticoagulants

Clinical and imaging characteristics of patients receiving direct oral anticoagulants presenting with transient ischaemic attack or stroke are lacking. A retrospective review of all patients who presented to a high-volume primary stroke centre with acute stroke symptoms while prescribed an oral anticoagulant between January 2012 and June 2017. Clinical, radiological characteristics and functional outcomes were examined. Anticoagulated patients diagnosed with stroke or transient ischaemic attack shared similar disease and outcome characteristics irrespective of anticoagulants used. One-third of warfarin patients with sub-therapeutic international normalised ratios were treated with thrombolytics but no direct oral anticoagulants level was performed in any of the patients, with only one treated by intravenous thrombolysis.

The safety of oral anticoagulants registry (SOAR): A national, ED-based study of the evaluation and management of bleeding and bleeding concerns due to the use of oral anticoagulants

OBJECTIVE

The Safety of Oral Anticoagulants Registry (SOAR) was designed to describe the evaluation and management of patients with oral anticoagulant (OAC)-related major bleeding or bleeding concerns who present to the emergency department (ED) with acute illness or injury. Patients in the ED are increasingly taking anticoagulants, which can cause bleeding-related complications as well as impact the acute management of related or unrelated clinical issues that prompt presentation. Modifications of emergency evaluation and management due to anticoagulation have not previously been studied.

METHODS

This was a multicenter observational in-hospital study of patients who were judged to be experiencing an active OAC effect and had (a) an obvious bleeding event or (b) were deemed at risk for serious bleeding spontaneously, after injury, or during an indicated invasive procedure. Diagnostic testing, therapies employed, and clinical outcomes were collected.

RESULTS

Thirty-one US hospitals contributed data to SOAR. Of 1513 subjects, acute hemorrhage (AH) qualified 78%, while 22% had a bleeding concern (BC). Warfarin was the index OAC in 37.3%, dabigatran in 13.3%, and an anti-Factor X_a in 49.4%. The most common sites of AH were gastrointestinal (51.0%) and intracranial (26.8%). In warfarin-treated patients, the mean (IQR) presenting INR was 3.1 (2.2, 4.8) in AH patients and 3.9 (2.4, 7.2) in BC patients. Three-fifths of SOAR patients were treated with factor repletion or specific reversal agents, and those patients had a longer length of stay. In addition, seven (0.76%) of the treated patients experienced an in-hospital thrombotic complication; two of these seven died on the index admission, both of fatal pulmonary embolism. Vitamin K was used and dosed inconsistently in both warfarin and NOAC cohorts.

CONCLUSION

Care of anticoagulated patients in the acute care setting is inconsistent, reflecting the diversity of presentation. As the prevalence of OAC use increases with the aging of the US population, further study and targeted educational efforts are needed to drive more evidence-based care of these patients.

Successful thrombolytic therapy with recombinant tissue plasminogen activator in ischemic stroke after idarucizumab administration for reversal of dabigatran: a case report

Background

Idarucizumab is a specific antidote for the anticoagulant dabigatran. Although its efficacy has been recently reported, the drug is still in postmarketing surveillance and requires case data in different emergency settings. A newer intravenous thrombolytic therapy with recombinant tissue plasminogen activator has been proposed after injection of idarucizumab in patients receiving dabigatran; however, the safety and efficacy of this therapy are equivocal because of the limited number of reported cases. We describe a case of a patient with acute lacunar stroke causing dysarthria and hemiparesis successfully treated with intravenous thrombolytic therapy with recombinant tissue plasminogen activator after reversal of dabigatran with idarucizumab.

Case presentation

A 67-year-old Asian woman was transferred to our emergency center 200 minutes after sudden onset of dysarthria and right-sided hemiparesis. She had been taking dabigatran for prevention of stroke recurrence caused by atrial fibrillation. Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging revealed a new lacunar infarction near old putamen infarctions. We treated her with intravenous thrombolytic therapy with recombinant tissue plasminogen activator after administering idarucizumab. The time to recombinant tissue plasminogen activator administration was 5 minutes from idarucizumab injection and 269 minutes from symptom onset. The patient’s activated partial thromboplastin times were 68.0 and 43.2 seconds before and after the therapy, respectively. The patient’s neurological symptoms improved significantly after the treatment, and she experienced no adverse events.

Conclusions

Intravenous thrombolytic therapy with recombinant tissue plasminogen activator after reversal of dabigatran with idarucizumab may be safe and feasible in patients with acute ischemic stroke with lacunar infarct. Furthermore, intravenous thrombolytic therapy with recombinant tissue plasminogen activator could be used in patients in emergency settings until just before the end of the recommended time limit within which it needs to be administered because of the immediate effect of idarucizumab.

The 2018 European Heart Rhythm Association Practical Guide on the use of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants in patients with atrial fibrillation

The current manuscript is the second update of the original Practical Guide, published in 2013 [Heidbuchel et al. European Heart Rhythm Association Practical Guide on the use of new oral anticoagulants in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation. Europace 2013;15:625-651; Heidbuchel et al. Updated European Heart Rhythm Association Practical Guide on the use of non-vitamin K antagonist anticoagulants in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation. Europace 2015;17:1467-1507]. Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) are an alternative for vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) to prevent stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and have emerged as the preferred choice, particularly in patients newly started on anticoagulation. Both physicians and patients are becoming more accustomed to the use of these drugs in clinical practice. However, many unresolved questions on how to optimally use these agents in specific clinical situations remain. The European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) set out to coordinate a unified way of informing physicians on the use of the different NOACs. A writing group identified 20 topics of concrete clinical scenarios for which practical answers were formulated, based on available evidence. The 20 topics are as follows i.e., (1) Eligibility for NOACs; (2) Practical start-up and follow-up scheme for patients on NOACs; (3) Ensuring adherence to prescribed oral anticoagulant intake; (4) Switching between anticoagulant regimens; (5) Pharmacokinetics and drug-drug interactions of NOACs; (6) NOACs in patients with chronic kidney or advanced liver disease; (7) How to measure the anticoagulant effect of NOACs; (8) NOAC plasma level measurement: rare indications, precautions, and potential pitfalls; (9) How to deal with dosing errors; (10) What to do if there is a (suspected) overdose without bleeding, or a clotting test is indicating a potential risk of bleeding; (11) Management of bleeding under NOAC therapy; (12) Patients undergoing a planned invasive procedure, surgery or ablation; (13) Patients requiring an urgent surgical intervention; (14) Patients with AF and coronary artery disease; (15) Avoiding confusion with NOAC dosing across indications; (16) Cardioversion in a NOAC-treated patient; (17) AF patients presenting with acute stroke while on NOACs; (18) NOACs in special situations; (19) Anticoagulation in AF patients with a malignancy; and (20) Optimizing dose adjustments of VKA. Additional information and downloads of the text and anticoagulation cards in different languages can be found on an EHRA website (www.NOACforAF.eu).

Idarucizumab for Reversal of Dabigatran in Early/Emergency Surgeries: A Case Series

BACKGROUND

Idarucizumab is a humanized, monoclonal antibody fragment used specifically to reverse the anticoagulant effects of dabigatran.

CASE REPORTS

We discuss 4 cases of patients who were treated with idarucizumab to reverse dabigatran before early/emergency surgery. Two of the patients had subdural hematomas, 1 had a splenic laceration, and 1 had Fournier gangrene. All patients received 5 g of idarucizumab before surgery. Intraoperative blood loss in all patients was normal, no adverse events were reported, and the patients recovered normally. WHY SHOULD AN EMERGENCY PHYSICIAN BE AWARE OF THIS?: The case reports presented provide detailed, practical, real-world experience beyond that reported in other case reports and the Reversal Effects of Idarucizumab on Active Dabigatran study. This can help guide clinicians on how idarucizumab can reverse the anticoagulant effect of dabigatran in emergency situations, including patients with subdural hematoma. Our experience suggests that idarucizumab may be a safe and effective antidote to the effects of dabigatran in real-life bleeding situations involving early or emergency surgeries.

Perioperative Management of Patients Receiving New Anticoagulants

There is an increased use of oral anticoagulants for the prevention of venous and arterial thrombosis. Vitamin-K antagonists have been used for decades as the main oral anticoagulants but they have the draback a complex therapeutic management, slow onset of action and by a different oral intake caused by dietary vitamin K intake. New non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) have been developed to overcome the limitations of warfarin. Their management is easier as it requires a fixed daily dose without coagulation monitoring. Although their therapeutic profile is safe, proper attention should be paid in case of unexpected need for the reversal of their coagulation effect and in case a patient needs to have a scheduled surgery. For non-acute cardiac surgery, discontinuation of NOACs should start at least 48 hours prior surgery. Intracranial bleedings associated with NOACs are less dangerous comparing to those warfarin-induced. NOACs need to be stopped ≥24 hours in case of elective surgery for low bleeding-risk procedures and ≥48 hours for high bleeding-risk surgery in patients with normal renal function and 72 hours in case of reduced CrCl < 80. The therapy with NOACs should be resumed from 48 to 72 hours after the procedure depending on the perceived bleeding, type of surgery and thrombotic risks. There are some available NOAC reversal agents acting within 5 to 20 minutes. In case of lack of reversal agent, adequate diuresis, renal replacement therapy and activated charcoal in case of recent ingestion should be considered.

Idarucizumab administration in emergency situations: the Munich Registry of Reversal of Pradaxa® in clinical routine (MR REPAIR)

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate daily life management and functional outcome of Idarucizumab administration in case of emergency situations in patients with Dabigatran treatment.

DESIGN

Multicenter observational registry study.

SETTING

All hospitals with full neurological departments (n = 6) in Munich, Germany INCLUDED PATIENTS: All patients treated with Idarucizumab from 01/2016 to 03/2019.

ANALYZED DATA

Indication and application of Idarucizumab, demographics and clinical parameters, and further interventions and treatments; clinical outcome was assessed with the modified Rankin scale (mRS) at 3 months after Idarucizumab administration RESULTS: Idarucizumab was administered to 32 patients for severe bleeding complications and ischemic strokes, more precisely for the following specific indications: intracranial bleeding (17 patients, 53%), ischemic stroke (8 patients, 25%), gastrointestinal bleeding (3 patients, 9%), femoral fracture, aortic dissection, and abdominal trauma and ileus (1 patient each, 3%). Additional coagulation management was performed in 7 patients (22%). Nine patients (28%) underwent emergency surgery. Seven patients (22%) received Idarucizumab before intravenous thrombolysis due to ischemic stroke and 4 of these 7 patients (13%) received mechanical thrombectomy in addition. Indication was mainly based on the history of Dabigatran intake and was irrespective of laboratory testing. At follow-up, 25% of the investigated patients had a mRS 0-2, while 25% had an unfavorable outcome (mRS 4-5). Mortality was 31%.

CONCLUSION

In our study, we have shown that the administration of Idarucizumab is a rare intervention and restricted to patients with severe bleeding complications or ischemic stroke. The clinical outcome of patients who received Idarucizumab in emergency situations was poor.

Intracranial hemorrhage in patients taking oral anticoagulants. Current possibilities for therapy

The paper reviews an update on the possibilities of providing care for patients with spontaneous non-traumatic intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) developing in patients with atrial fibrillation who use oral anticoagulants. The incidence of ICH is shown to be considerably lower when nonvitamin K-dependent anticoagulants (NOACs) are used, but the hematoma evolution scenarios do not differ between the groups of patients receiving vitamin K antagonists or NOACs. The results of studies assessing hypertension therapy in patients with ICH are compared. The possibilities of using various reversal agents for various oral anticoagulants are also discussed. Since one of the main problems associated with increased mortality and severe disabilities is the progression rate of ICH, the possibility of using a specific antagonist can determine the choice of an anticoagulant for the primary prevention of ischemic stroke in a patient with atrial fibrillation.

Reversal of oral anticoagulation in patients with acute intracerebral hemorrhage

In light of an aging population with increased cardiovascular comorbidity, the use of oral anticoagulation (OAC) is steadily expanding. A variety of pharmacological alternatives to vitamin K antagonists (VKA) have emerged over recent years (direct oral anticoagulants, DOAC, i.e., dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, and edoxaban) which show a reduced risk for the occurrence of intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH). Yet, in the event of ICH under OAC (OAC-ICH), hematoma characteristics are similarly severe and clinical outcomes likewise substantially limited in both patients with VKA- and DOAC-ICH, which is why optimal acute hemostatic treatment in all OAC-ICH needs to be guaranteed. Currently, International Guidelines for the hemostatic management of patients with OAC-ICH are updated as several relevant large-sized observational studies and recent trials have established treatment approaches for both VKA- and DOAC-ICH. While the management of VKA-ICH is mainly based on the immediate reversal of elevated levels of international normalized ratio using prothrombin complex concentrates, hemostatic management of DOAC-associated ICH is challenging requiring specific antidotes, notably idarucizumab and andexanet alfa. This review will provide an overview of the latest studies and trials on hemostatic reversal agents and timing and summarizes the effects on hemorrhage progression and clinical outcomes in patients with OAC-ICH.

Patients on NOACs in the Emergency Room

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Despite the increasing use of NOACs, there is still uncertainty on how to treat NOAC patients presenting with neurological emergencies. Initial assessment of coagulation status is challenging but essential in these patients to provide best-possible treatment in case of ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke. Meanwhile, anticoagulation reversal strategies have been suggested; yet, the optimal management is still unestablished. The current review aims to provide up-to-date information on (i) how to identify patients with NOAC intake, (ii) which therapies are feasible in the setting of ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke as well as traumatic intracranial hemorrhage, and (iii) how to proceed with patients requiring emergency lumbar puncture.

RECENT FINDINGS

Despite several expert opinions, there is still an ongoing debate which NOAC patients presenting with ischemic stroke may benefit from recanalizing strategies and whether these treatment approaches can be performed safely. Results from two phase IV trials investigating the efficacy of NOAC-specific reversal agents in case of major bleeding seem promising with regard to hemostatic parameters, but these antidotes have not been verified to clinically benefit patients, and approval by authorities in parts is still pending. Specific reversal agents are on the way and will provide new treatment options in patients with NOAC-related ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke. Up to now, the decision which patients should undergo recanalizing treatment for ischemic stroke, or which specific pharmacological reversal treatment in hemorrhagic stroke should be initiated, has to be made cautiously on an individual basis after assessing hemostatic parameters.

Clinical presentation, diagnostic findings and management of cerebral ischemic events in patients on treatment with non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants - A systematic review

Background

Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOAC) are equally or potentially superior in terms of effectiveness in the prevention of ischemic stroke and carry a lower associated risk of intracranial hemorrhage compared to Vitamin K antagonists. Nevertheless, ischemic strokes also occur in patients who are being treated with NOAC. In those particular patients, knowledge about the underlying stroke etiology, clinical presentation, acute management, and complication rates is scarce.

Objective

Systematic literature review to provide a comprehensive clinical overview in terms of presentation, laboratory, imaging parameters and outcomes of patients suffering from acute cerebral ischemic events (i.e. TIA and acute ischemic stroke) while on treatment with a NOAC. Only if available, comparison to VKA is presented which was not the primary focus of this analysis.

Data sources

PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus and EMBASE from January 1, 2006, to November 20, 2018.

Study eligibility criteria

52 studies providing detailed information on a total of 12247 patients were included. We excluded case reports and case series with less than five patients.

Study appraisal and synthesis method

We systematically assessed study quality using a bias tool and pooled consistent data.

Results

Existing data indicates milder stroke severity and smaller infarct size of acute ischemic stroke on treatment with NOAC compared to stroke occurrence on Vitamin K antagonists (VKA). Established risk factors for ischemic events also play a role in stroke while on NOACs, albeit the underlying etiology remains poorly understood. Intravenous thrombolysis and endovascular therapy seem to be safe and effective, but patient selection for recanalization therapies is challenging.

Limitations

Limited quality of published data, duplicate cases, statistical issues of data pooling, possible incomplete retrieval of identified research and reporting bias might have limited our findings.

Conclusions

Acute ischemic events despite treatment with NOAC therapy are insufficiently investigated.

Systematic review registration number

PROSPERO: CRD42018074853.

Immediate Reversal of Dabigatran by Idarucizumab Prior to Laboratory and Imaging Results in Acute Stroke

We report a case of intravenous thrombolysis in acute ischemic stroke of anterior choroidal artery following the antagonization of dabigatran with idarucizumab. No secondary complication, like hemorrhagic or thrombotic/thrombembolic event, of neither idarucizumab nor subsequent intravenous thrombolysis emerged. The recent approval of idarucizumab enables intravenous thrombolysis despite preexisiting oral anticoagulation with dabigatran, but raises the question of the optimal management and work flow of patients under medication with dabigatran and with acute neurological deficit, highly suspicious for an acute cerebrovascular event. In contrast to hitherto case reports and series, here, we explicitly refrained from awaiting the results of the thrombin time, as a marker for present anticoagulation by dabigatran, as well as the results of cerebral imaging before administration of idarucizumab. Based on the presented case we propose this approach to minimize door-to-needle time of intravenous thrombolysis in acute ischemic stroke and thus to enhance the chance for a good outcome.

Similar outcomes between vitamin K and non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants associated intracerebral hemorrhage

BACKGROUND

The application of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant (NOAC) reduces the risk of intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) in comparison with vitamin K antagonist (VKA). However, the features and outcomes of NOAC-associated ICH are still unclear, especially for Asian populations.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 49 consecutive patients who had spontaneous ICH while using NOAC or VKA. We compared the clinical characteristics, ICH volume, 7-day and 3-month mortality, and functional outcomes at discharge and 3 months post-stroke using the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) between NOAC- and VKA-associated ICH. The clinical features, ICH volume, ICH location, and/or treatment methods were statistically adjusted.

RESULTS

Among the 49 ICH patients, 15 (30.6%) were using NOAC and 34 (69.4%) were taking VKA. There were no significant differences in the initial ICH volume between groups (mean volume 34.2 ± 43.8 vs. 59.4 ± 46.5 mL, p = 0.061). The percentage of early mortality (within 7 days post-ICH) was significantly lower in the NOAC group (13.3% vs. 44.1%; p = 0.047), but the 3-month mortality was similar (33.3% vs. 47.1%; p = 0.294). The functional outcome was equally poor in both groups at discharge (p = 0.670) and 3 months post-ICH (mean mRS score 4.7 ± 1.3 vs. 4.6 ± 1.7, p = 0.766).

CONCLUSION

There were no significant differences in initial ICH volume, 90-day mortality, or functional outcomes between NOAC and VKA-associated ICH in Asians.

Intravenous Thrombolysis in Acute Ischemic Stroke After Idarucizumab Reversal of Dabigatran Effect: Analysis of the Cases From Taiwan

BACKGROUND

Asians with atrial fibrillation carry a higher risk of ischemic stroke than non-Asians even under treatment of nonvitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants. The purpose of the study was to observe the feasibility of intravenous thrombolytic therapy after administering a reversal agent, idarucizumab, in dabigatran-treated patients with acute ischemic stroke in Taiwan.

METHODS

Dabigatran-treated patients with acute ischemic stroke who received intravenous recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rt-PA) after idarucizumab reversal were enrolled in the retrospective nationwide study. The clinical data, treatment course, and outcomes were recorded. Stroke severity was evaluated using the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score. Any intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) after rt-PA was detected by neuroimaging studies.

RESULTS

Ten dabigatran-treated patients (6 men, mean age 71.10 ± 7.96 years) with acute ischemic stroke were included. Before stroke, the mean CHA₂DS₂-VASc score was 4.50 ± 1.57 and 8 patients (80%) received dabigatran 110 mg twice daily. All patients were treated with 5 g idarucizumab, following which the activated partial thromboplastin time normalized. Intravenous rt-PA (mean dose .78 mg/kg) was initiated a mean time of 11.11 minutes after idarucizumab infusion. The NIHSS score improved significantly after thrombolysis (16.0 ± 6.67 at admission to 9.38 ± 4.75 at discharge, P = .016). ICH developed in 3 patients (30%). Two of them were asymptomatic and 1 patient suffered from symptomatic ICH leading to mortality.

CONCLUSION

Our data reconfirmed the feasibility of intravenous rt-PA for Asian stroke patients after reversal of dabigatran effect with idarucizumab.

Endovascular stroke treatment does not preclude high thrombolysis rates

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

In 1995 intravenous recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (IVRTPA) was the first reperfusion therapy to be approved in patients with acute ischaemic stroke (AIS). The significance and impact of IVRTPA in times of modern endovascular stroke treatment (EST) were analysed in a German academic stroke centre.

METHODS

A retrospective observational cohort analysis of 1034 patients with suspected AIS presenting at the emergency department in 2014 was performed. Patients were evaluated for baseline characteristics, reperfusion procedures, IVRTPA eligibility, clinical outcome, symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage (sICH) and mortality. Data acquisition was part of an investigator-initiated, prospective and blinded end-point registry.

RESULTS

In 718 (69%) patients the diagnosis of symptomatic AIS was confirmed. 419 (58%) patients presented within 4.5 h of symptom onset and of those 260 (62%) received reperfusion therapy (IVRTPA alone, n = 183; combination or bridging therapy, n = 60; EST alone, n = 17). Subtracting cases with absolute contraindications for IVRTPA resulted in an effective thrombolysis rate of 82%. sICH occurred in two patients treated with IVRTPA alone (1.1%). The median door-to-needle interval was 30 min. Fifty (17%) non-EST eligible AIS patients presenting within 4.5 h without absolute contraindications did not receive IVRTPA mainly due to mild or regressive symptoms. Most of these untreated IVRTPA eligible patients (82%) were discharged with a good clinical outcome (modified Rankin Scale ≤ 2).

CONCLUSIONS

Intravenous recombinant tissue plasminogen activator remains the most frequently applied reperfusion therapy in AIS patients presenting within 4.5 h of onset in a tertiary stroke centre. An effective thrombolysis rate of over 80% can be achieved without increased rates of sICH.

Reversal of dabigatran using idarucizumab: single center experience in four acute stroke patients

Dabigatran is a direct thrombin inhibitor and a non-vitamin-K-antagonizing oral anticoagulant, approved for the prevention of stroke and systemic embolization in atrial fibrillation. Idarucizumab is a humanized monoclonal antibody that was recently approved for antagonizing the anticoagulant effects of dabigatran. Here, we report the use of idarucizumab in four acute stroke patients treated with dabigatran in order to enable intravenous thrombolysis in three patients and emergent trepanation in one patient with space occupying subdural hematoma. Since experience on the optimal management of acute stroke patients under medication with dabigatran and on the use of idarucizumab is currently limited, we propose an approach for laboratory testing and fast administration of intravenous thrombolysis and neurosurgery based on our experience.

Management of patients with stroke treated with direct oral anticoagulants

Since their market approval, direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are being increasingly used for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation. However, the management of DOAC-treated patients with stroke poses several challenges for physicians in everyday clinical practice, both in the acute setting and in long-term care. This has spurred extensive research activity in the field over the past few years, which we review here.

Reversal of Vitamin K Antagonist Therapy Before Thrombolysis for Acute Ischemic Stroke

Background and Purpose—

Acute ischemic strokes under vitamin K antagonist (VKA) treatment are not uncommon, but intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) is not recommended for international normalized ratio (INR) >1.7 because of the excess bleeding risk. However, VKA-induced anticoagulation can be easily reversed by IV infusions of 4-factor prothrombin complex concentrate bolus and vitamin K. Our pilot study aimed to determine whether IVT immediately after anticoagulation reversal could be feasible and safe in acute ischemic stroke patients under VKA with INR >1.7.

Methods—

Consecutive acute ischemic stroke patients, otherwise eligible for IVT except for VKA intake and INR >1.7, were given IVT after infusing 4-factor prothrombin complex concentrate and vitamin K. Safety and efficacy were assessed clinically and by cerebral imaging at 24 hours.

Results—

Twenty-six patients (age, 77.8±12.8 years; atrial fibrillation, 84.6%; initial National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale, 11.6±5.6) were prospectively included. INR values were 2.3±0.6 initially and 1.3±0.2, 5 minutes postreversal. No symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage or thrombotic events occurred during the first 3 days. One patient developed major systemic hemorrhoidal bleeding that required blood transfusion; 61.5% of the patients were independent (modified Rankin Scale score of ≤2) at 3 months.

Conclusions—

A reversal strategy of 4-factor prothrombin complex concentrate bolus and vitamin K before IVT could be feasible and safe in acute ischemic stroke patients under VKA with INR >1.7. Well-designed, randomized controlled trials are warranted to confirm these preliminary findings.

Non-Vitamin K Oral Anticoagulants Associated Bleeding and Its Antidotes

Oral anticoagulant-associated intracerebral hemorrhage (OAC-ICH) accounts for nearly 20% of all ICH. The number of patients with an indication for oral anticoagulant therapy (OAT) increases with increasing age. OAT became less complicate with the introduction of non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants (NOAC) OAT because of easier handling, favorable risk-benefit profile, reduced rates of ICH compared to vitamin K antagonists and no need for routine coagulation testing. Consequently, despite a better safety profile of NOAC the number of patients with OAC-ICH will increase. The mortality and complication rates of OAC-ICH are high and therefore they are the most feared complication of OAT. Immediate normalization of coagulation is the main goal and therefore knowledge of pharmacodynamics and coagulation status is essential. Laboratory measurements of anticoagulant activity in NOAC patients is challenging as specific tests are not widely available. More accessible tests such as the prothrombin time and activated partial thromboplastin time have important limitations. In dabigatran-associated ICH 5 g Idarucizumab should be administered. In rivaroxaban and apixaban-associated ICHs administration of andexanet alpha should be considered. Prothrombin complex concentrate may be considered if andexanet alpha is not available or in case of an ICH associated with edoxaban.

Consensus Guides on Stroke Thrombolysis for Anticoagulated Patients from Japan: Application to Other Populations

Development of direct oral anticoagulants and their antidotes has led to the need to reconsider the eligibility of acute stroke patients who have been taking oral anticoagulants for intravenous thrombolysis. Officially authorized Japanese guidelines on this issue were revised twice at the time of approval for clinical use of direct oral anticoagulants and idarucizumab, a specific reversal agent for dabigatran. A unique recommendation in the latest Japanese clinical guides was that thrombolysis can be recommended if the time of the last dose of direct oral anticoagulants exceeds 4 hours and if commonly available anticoagulation markers are normal or subnormal, i.e., international normalized ratio of prothrombin time <1.7 and activated partial thromboplastin time <1.5 times the baseline value (≤40 seconds only as a guide). These criteria are partly supported by the findings of domestic multicenter and single-center surveys that symptomatic or asymptomatic intracranial hemorrhage following thrombolysis was rare under the conditions of the criteria. Even for dabigatran users, stroke thrombolysis can be considered without pretreatment by idarucizumab if patients meet the above criteria. If not, direct mechanical thrombectomy can be considered without pretreatment by idarucizumab or thrombolysis, and use of idarucizumab, followed immediately by thrombolysis, can be considered only when thrombectomy cannot be quickly performed. These clinical guides are practical and to some extent economical, but they have some limitations, including lack of corroborating information from sufficient numbers of relevant cases. The guides will be further modified based on the results of future research.

Prehospital idarucizumab prior to intravenous thrombolysis in a mobile stroke unit

Background

Administration of intravenous idarucizumab to reverse dabigatran anticoagulation prior to thrombolysis for patients with acute ischemic stroke has been previously described, but not in the prehospital setting. The speed and predictability of idarucizumab reversal is well suited to prehospital treatment in a mobile stroke unit and allows patients with recent dabigatran intake to access reperfusion therapy.

Aims

To describe feasibility of prehospital idarucizumab administration prior to thrombolysis on the Melbourne mobile stroke unit.

Methods

The Melbourne mobile stroke unit is a specialized stroke ambulance servicing central metropolitan Melbourne, Australia and provides prehospital assessment, scanning and treatment with an integrated CT scanner and multidisciplinary stroke team. All cases were identified through the mobile stroke unit treatment registry since launch in November 2017.

Results

Of a total of n = 20 thrombolysis cases in the first 4 months of operation, three patients (15%) received intravenous idarucizumab 5 g for dabigatran reversal prior to thrombolysis. Mean time between idarucizumab administration and thrombolysis was approximately 10 minutes. Two of the three patients were shown to have large vessel occlusion on CTA in the mobile stroke unit and proceeded to endovascular thrombectomy. At 24 hours, only one patient had a small amount of asymptomatic petechial hemorrhage on follow-up imaging. All patients demonstrated substantial neurological recovery and were discharged to inpatient rehabilitation.

Conclusions

Rapid treatment with prehospital administration of idarucizumab prior to thrombolysis using a mobile stroke unit is feasible and facilitates hyperacute treatment.

Intravenous Thrombolysis in Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke after a Reversal of Dabigatran Anticoagulation with Idarucizumab: A Real-World Clinical Experience

BACKGROUND

Intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) is contraindicated in patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) using oral anticoagulants. A specific human monoclonal antibody was introduced to reverse immediately the anticoagulation effect of the direct inhibitor of thrombin, dabigatran. Until now, mostly individual cases presenting with successful IVT after a reversal of dabigatran anticoagulation in patients with AIS were published. Thus, we aimed to report real-world data from clinical practice.

METHODS

Patients with AIS on dabigatran treated with IVT after antidote reversal were enrolled in the retrospective nationwide study. Neurological deficit was scored using the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) and 90-day clinical outcome using modified Rankin scale (mRS) with a score 0-2 for a good outcome. Intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) was defined as a presence of any sign of bleeding on control imaging after IVT, and symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (SICH) was assessed according to the Safe Implementation of Thrombolysis in Stroke-Monitoring Study (SITS-MOST) criteria.

RESULTS

In total, 13 patients (7 men, mean age 70.0 ± 9.1 years) with a median NIHSS admission score of 7 points were analyzed. Of these patients, 61.5% used 2 × 150 mg of dabigatran daily. Antidote was administrated 427 ± 235 minutes after the last intake of dabigatran, with a mean activated prothrombin time of 38.1 ± 27.8 seconds and a mean thrombin time of 72.2 ± 56.1 seconds. Of the 13 patients, 2 had ICH and 1 had SICH, and no other bleeding complications were observed after IVT. Of the total number of patients, 76.9% had a good 3-month clinical outcome and 3 patients (23.1%) died. Recurrent ischemic stroke occurred in 2 patients (15.4%).

CONCLUSION

The data presented in the study support the safety and efficacy of IVT after the reversal of the anticoagulation effect of dabigatran with antidote in a real-world clinical practice.

Thrombolytic Therapy in Severe Cardioembolic Stroke After Reversal of Dabigatran with Idarucizumab: Case Report and Literature Review

Whether idarucizumab, an antidote of dabigatran, can be used effectively and safely before thrombolytic therapy with recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rt-PA) in patients with stroke undergoing treatment with dabigatran remains unknown. We herein describe a 57-year-old man who developed severe cardioembolic stroke with a National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score of 22 in the left middle cerebral artery territory while undergoing treatment with dabigatran for nonvalvular atrial fibrillation and who was treated with rt-PA after the reversal of dabigatran with idarucizumab. The thrombolytic therapy following the use of idarucizumab significantly improved the patient's neurological symptoms without hemorrhagic complications, although acute arterial occlusion of the right lower limb was found during the clinical course.

Outcome of intracerebral haemorrhage related to non-vitamin K antagonists oral anticoagulants versus vitamin K antagonists: a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

The characteristics and natural history of acute non-vitamin K antagonists oral anticoagulants (NOAC)-associated intracerebral haemorrhage (ICH) are largely unknown. We performed a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis to compare baseline ICH volume, haematoma expansion and clinical outcomes between NOAC-ICH versus vitamin K antagonists-ICH (VKA-ICH).

METHODS

We searched PubMed and conference abstracts for observational studies comparing baseline characteristics and outcomes in patients with NOAC-ICH versus VKA-ICH using an appropriate keyword/MeSH term search strategy. Data were extracted following PRISMA and MOOSE guidelines. The main outcome measures were mortality and unfavourable functional outcome (modified Rankin Score: 4-6) at discharge and at 3 months, as well as ICH volumes and haematoma expansion rates in the two groups. Random-effects models with DerSimonian-Laird weights were used for pooled estimates calculation.

RESULTS

Twelve studies including 393 NOAC-ICH and 3482 VKA-ICH were pooled in meta-analysis. There was no difference in mean ICH-volume between the two groups (standard mean difference: -0.24; 95% CI -0.52 to 0.04, p=0.093). The rates of haematoma expansion were comparable in NOAC-ICH versus VKA-ICH (OR: 0.76; 95% CI 0.49 to 1.19, p=0.236). We did not find any difference between patients with NOAC-ICH versus VKA-ICH in all-cause mortality at discharge (OR: 0.66; 95% CI 0.42 to 1.05, p=0.077) and unfavourable functional outcome at discharge (OR: 0.77; 95% CI 0.41 to 1.44, p=0.413). The 3-month outcome was also comparable between the two ICH groups. Moderate-to-substantial statistical heterogeneity was noted.

CONCLUSION

Our results confirm that ICH volume, haematoma expansion, mortality and functional outcome appear to be similar for NOAC-ICH versus VKA-ICH. Large prospective cohorts and updated meta-analyses are needed to provide more precise estimates.

Systemic thrombolysis and endovascular thrombectomy in severe acute ischemic stroke after dabigatran reversal with idarucizumab

Patients presenting with an acute ischemic stroke despite dabigatran therapy (last intake <24 h or unknown) should be evaluated for reversal by idarucizumab, making them eligible for safe and effective intravenous thrombolysis. It has been shown to be feasible, well‐tolerated, and easy to manage in an emergency room or stroke unit.