1
|
Monnelly K, Marshall J, Dipper L, Cruice M. A systematic review of Intensive Comprehensive Aphasia Programmes - who takes part, what is measured, what are the outcomes? Disabil Rehabil 2024; 46:4335-4349. [PMID: 37916542 DOI: 10.1080/09638288.2023.2274877] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2023] [Revised: 10/18/2023] [Accepted: 10/20/2023] [Indexed: 11/03/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE This study synthesizes participant and outcome data from peer-reviewed Intensive Comprehensive Aphasia Programme (ICAP) studies. METHODS A systematic review was conducted following PRISMA guidelines. Study eligibility criteria were specified in relation to population, intervention, comparison, outcome, and design considerations. Data were extracted according to six research questions. Narrative synthesis was used. RESULTS Twenty-one studies were included covering 13 ICAPs (N = 485, aged 18-86 years, between 11 and 335 months post-stroke). Twenty-seven participant selection criteria were identified. Fifty-six outcome measures spanning the WHO-ICF were used, with the majority assessing the body function domain. Only eight studies employed an experimental design with data appropriate for analysis and synthesis. Risk of bias was noted across this sub-group. Participants improved in word-finding, communication, activity/participation, and communication-related quality of life, and maintained their gains; however, except for word finding, evidence of effect came from isolated studies. Factors influencing outcomes were rarely considered. Some drop-outs, missed sessions, and fatigue were noted. Some studies reported IPD alongside group analyses. CONCLUSIONS ICAP selection criteria need justification and should contribute to the understanding of candidacy for this treatment model. Rationalisation of ICAP treatment content and outcome measurement is required, spanning all WHO-ICF domains. Employment of the core outcome set for aphasia would enable data synthesis and facilitate comparisons between the ICAP and other therapy models.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katie Monnelly
- Department of Language and Communication Science, City, University of London, London, UK
| | - Jane Marshall
- Department of Language and Communication Science, City, University of London, London, UK
| | - Lucy Dipper
- Department of Language and Communication Science, City, University of London, London, UK
| | - Madeline Cruice
- Department of Language and Communication Science, City, University of London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Rotherham A, Shrubsole K, Croteau C, Hilari K, Wallace H, Wallace SJ. Measuring successful conversations in couples with and without aphasia: A scoping review. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LANGUAGE & COMMUNICATION DISORDERS 2024. [PMID: 39150411 DOI: 10.1111/1460-6984.13098] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2022] [Accepted: 07/24/2024] [Indexed: 08/17/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Aphasia impacts communication and relationships. While counselling is increasingly recognised as a component of the speech-language therapy role, the success of conversation partner training is typically measured in terms of communication alone. This scoping review aimed to describe how successful conversation is currently measured with couples-with and without aphasia, to inform the development of an ecologically valid measure for couples with aphasia. METHODS AND PROCEDURES The scoping review was reported in alignment with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis Extensions for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-SCR). MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL and PsycINFO databases were searched for conversation treatment studies for couples with and without aphasia. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) were extracted from included studies and screened against the three-tier model of situated language to shortlist those that measure everyday communication. Items within shortlisted PROMs were further described using the refined International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health linking rules. RESULTS Following screening and full-text review, 46 studies were included, consisting of 24 studies conducted with couples with aphasia and 22 studies conducted with couples without aphasia. For couples with aphasia, 13 PROMs were identified that measured everyday communication. Of these, 23% were dyadic (i.e., measured from the perspectives of both members of the couple); however, they usually only appraised the communication behaviours of the person with aphasia. For couples without aphasia, eight PROMs were identified that measured everyday communication; all were dyadic and measured both attitudes and communication behaviours of both partners. CONCLUSION Conversation relies on the interaction of two people, and success in conversation is best rated by those having the conversation. The use of PROMs is recommended as part of person and relationship-centred practice; however, there is currently no validated PROM for conversation in aphasia that considers the perspectives and behaviours of both the person with aphasia and their communication partner. The PROM items identified in this study will form the basis of future research to develop a PROM for couples' conversations in aphasia. WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS What is already known on the subject Communication partner training (CPT) for couples, where one person has aphasia, can improve conversation skills and enhance relationships. Clinician-rated measures, such as conversation analysis, have been used to measure the outcomes of CPT. However, there is a lack of person-centred or self-rated outcome measurement instruments. that is, patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) for couples' conversations in aphasia. What this paper adds to existing knowledge We have identified outcome measurement instruments used in conversation treatment studies for couples with and without aphasia. We found that most PROMs used in aphasia treatment studies were not dyadic, that is, they did not include the self-report of both communication partners. In contrast, the PROMs used with couples without aphasia were dyadic and contained items that measured a more complex range of both partners' emotions, behaviours and attitudes. What are the potential or actual clinical implications of this work? This study provides insights into the content and characteristics of PROMs for couples' conversation therapy and may assist clinicians in selecting outcome measurement instruments in their practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Annette Rotherham
- Queensland Aphasia Research Centre, School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
- Surgical Treatment and Rehabilitation Service (STARS) Education and Research Alliance, The University of Queensland and Metro North Health, Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Kirstine Shrubsole
- Queensland Aphasia Research Centre, School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
- Surgical Treatment and Rehabilitation Service (STARS) Education and Research Alliance, The University of Queensland and Metro North Health, Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
- Faculty of Health, Southern Cross University, Gold Coast, Australia
| | - Claire Croteau
- École d'orthophonie et d'audiologie, University of Montreal, Montreal, Canada
| | - Katerina Hilari
- School of Health and Psychological Sciences, City, University of London, London, UK
| | - Helen Wallace
- Queensland Aphasia Research Centre, School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
- Surgical Treatment and Rehabilitation Service (STARS) Education and Research Alliance, The University of Queensland and Metro North Health, Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Sarah J Wallace
- Queensland Aphasia Research Centre, School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
- Surgical Treatment and Rehabilitation Service (STARS) Education and Research Alliance, The University of Queensland and Metro North Health, Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Burfein P, Roxbury T, Doig EJ, McSween MP, de Silva N, Copland DA. Return to work for stroke survivors with aphasia: A quantitative scoping review. Neuropsychol Rehabil 2024:1-35. [PMID: 39087687 DOI: 10.1080/09602011.2024.2381874] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2023] [Accepted: 07/11/2024] [Indexed: 08/02/2024]
Abstract
The international incidence of stroke in people of working age is rising. As such, meaningful work return is a major rehabilitation goal for many individuals, including those with aphasia. This scoping review aimed to outline the post-stroke aphasia evidence related to work outcomes, factors influencing employment along with contemporary vocational-language and communication rehabilitation practice. The review employed terms related to aphasia, stroke, rehabilitation, and return to work in publications preceding 25.6.2023. Data were descriptively analysed, and vocational outcomes were summarized at defined timepoints. Of the 908 articles reviewed, 31 papers were included. Individuals with post-stroke aphasia consistently have lower rates of return to work than those post-stroke without aphasia. Employment at one year was 34.29% for those with aphasia compared to 58.46% for people without aphasia. No literature reported vocational-language assessment practices and there were minimal work-focused aphasia interventions identified. There was insufficient evidence to clearly identify person-related, rehabilitation, workplace or other factors influencing work return. This scoping review has identified that there are gaps in knowledge about the factors that influence work return and targeted vocational rehabilitation for this group. Future research to optimize return to work for individuals with aphasia is recommended.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P Burfein
- Queensland Aphasia Research Centre, School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
- Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Metro North Health, Brisbane, Australia
- Surgical Treatment and Rehabilitation Service (STARS) Education and Research Alliance, The University of Queensland and Metro North Health, Brisbane, Australia
| | - T Roxbury
- Queensland Aphasia Research Centre, School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
- Surgical Treatment and Rehabilitation Service (STARS) Education and Research Alliance, The University of Queensland and Metro North Health, Brisbane, Australia
| | - E J Doig
- Surgical Treatment and Rehabilitation Service (STARS) Education and Research Alliance, The University of Queensland and Metro North Health, Brisbane, Australia
| | - M-P McSween
- Queensland Aphasia Research Centre, School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
- Surgical Treatment and Rehabilitation Service (STARS) Education and Research Alliance, The University of Queensland and Metro North Health, Brisbane, Australia
| | - N de Silva
- Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Metro North Health, Brisbane, Australia
- Surgical Treatment and Rehabilitation Service (STARS) Education and Research Alliance, The University of Queensland and Metro North Health, Brisbane, Australia
| | - D A Copland
- Queensland Aphasia Research Centre, School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
- Surgical Treatment and Rehabilitation Service (STARS) Education and Research Alliance, The University of Queensland and Metro North Health, Brisbane, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Zingelman S, Cadilhac DA, Kim J, Stone M, Harvey S, Unsworth C, O'Halloran R, Hersh D, Mainstone K, Wallace SJ. 'A Meaningful Difference, but Not Ultimately the Difference I Would Want': A Mixed-Methods Approach to Explore and Benchmark Clinically Meaningful Changes in Aphasia Recovery. Health Expect 2024; 27:e14169. [PMID: 39105687 DOI: 10.1111/hex.14169] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2024] [Revised: 07/07/2024] [Accepted: 07/20/2024] [Indexed: 08/07/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Outcome measurement instruments (OMIs) are used to gauge the effects of treatment. In post-stroke aphasia rehabilitation, benchmarks for meaningful change are needed to support the interpretation of patient outcomes. This study is part of a research programme to establish minimal important change (MIC) values (the smallest change above which patients perceive themselves as importantly changed) for core OMIs. As a first step in this process, the views of people with aphasia and clinicians were explored, and consensus was sought on a threshold for clinically meaningful change. METHODS Sequential mixed-methods design was employed. Participants included people with post-stroke aphasia and speech pathologists. People with aphasia were purposively sampled based on time post-stroke, age and gender, whereas speech pathologists were sampled according to their work setting (hospital or community). Each participant attended a focus group followed by a consensus workshop with a survey component. Within the focus groups, experiences and methods for measuring meaningful change during aphasia recovery were explored. Qualitative data were transcribed and analysed using reflexive thematic analysis. In the consensus workshop, participants voted on thresholds for meaningful change in core outcome constructs of language, communication, emotional well-being and quality of life, using a six-point rating scale (much worse, slightly worse, no change, slightly improved, much improved and completely recovered). Consensus was defined a priori as 70% agreement. Voting results were reported using descriptive statistics. RESULTS Five people with aphasia (n = 4, > 6 months after stroke; n = 5, < 65 years; n = 3, males) and eight speech pathologists (n = 4, hospital setting; n = 4, community setting) participated in one of four focus groups (duration: 92-112 min). Four themes were identified describing meaningful change as follows: (1) different for every single person; (2) small continuous improvements; (3) measured by progress towards personally relevant goals; and (4) influenced by personal factors. 'Slightly improved' was agreed as the threshold of MIC on the anchor-rating scale (75%-92%) within 6 months of stroke, whereas after 6 months there was a trend towards supporting 'much improved' (36%-66%). CONCLUSION Our mixed-methods research with people with aphasia and speech pathologists provides novel evidence to inform the definition of MIC in aphasia rehabilitation. Future research will aim to establish MIC values for core OMIs. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION This work is the result of engagement between people with lived experience of post-stroke aphasia, including people with aphasia, family members, clinicians and researchers. Engagement across the research cycle was sought to ensure that the research tasks were acceptable and easily understood by participants and that the outcomes of the study were relevant to the aphasia community. This engagement included the co-development of a plain English summary of the results. Advisors were remunerated in accordance with Health Consumers Queensland guidelines. Interview guides for clinicians were piloted by speech pathologists working in aphasia rehabilitation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sally Zingelman
- School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Queensland Aphasia Research Centre, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland, Australia
- Surgical Treatment and Rehabilitation Service (STARS) Education and Research Alliance, The University of Queensland and Metro North Health, Herston, Queensland, Australia
- Centre of Research Excellence in Aphasia Recovery and Rehabilitation, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Dominique A Cadilhac
- Centre of Research Excellence in Aphasia Recovery and Rehabilitation, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Stroke and Ageing Research, Department of Medicine, School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
- Stroke Division, The Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
| | - Joosup Kim
- Stroke and Ageing Research, Department of Medicine, School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
- Stroke Division, The Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
| | - Marissa Stone
- School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Queensland Aphasia Research Centre, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland, Australia
- Surgical Treatment and Rehabilitation Service (STARS) Education and Research Alliance, The University of Queensland and Metro North Health, Herston, Queensland, Australia
- Centre of Research Excellence in Aphasia Recovery and Rehabilitation, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne, Fitzroy, Victoria, Australia
| | - Sam Harvey
- School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Queensland Aphasia Research Centre, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland, Australia
- Surgical Treatment and Rehabilitation Service (STARS) Education and Research Alliance, The University of Queensland and Metro North Health, Herston, Queensland, Australia
- Centre of Research Excellence in Aphasia Recovery and Rehabilitation, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Carolyn Unsworth
- Department of Medicine, School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
- Institute of Health and Wellbeing, Federation University, Ballarat, Victoria, Australia
| | - Robyn O'Halloran
- Centre of Research Excellence in Aphasia Recovery and Rehabilitation, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne, Fitzroy, Victoria, Australia
- Discipline of Speech Pathology, School of Allied Health, Human Services and Sport, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Victoria, Australia
| | - Deborah Hersh
- Speech Pathology, Curtin School of Allied Health, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
- School of Allied Health Science and Practice, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Kathryn Mainstone
- School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Queensland Aphasia Research Centre, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland, Australia
- Surgical Treatment and Rehabilitation Service (STARS) Education and Research Alliance, The University of Queensland and Metro North Health, Herston, Queensland, Australia
| | - Sarah J Wallace
- School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Queensland Aphasia Research Centre, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland, Australia
- Surgical Treatment and Rehabilitation Service (STARS) Education and Research Alliance, The University of Queensland and Metro North Health, Herston, Queensland, Australia
- Centre of Research Excellence in Aphasia Recovery and Rehabilitation, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Sung JE, DeDe G, Park J. Interplay of Semantic Plausibility and Word Order Canonicity in Sentence Processing of People With Aphasia Using a Verb-Final Language. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY 2024:1-11. [PMID: 38991166 DOI: 10.1044/2024_ajslp-23-00353] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/13/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE The Western Aphasia Battery is widely used to assess people with aphasia (PWA). Sequential Commands (SC) is one of the most challenging subtests for PWA. However, test items confound linguistic factors that make sentences difficult for PWA. The current study systematically manipulated semantic plausibility and word order in sentences like those in SC to examine how these factors affect comprehension deficits in aphasia. METHOD Fifty Korean speakers (25 PWA and 25 controls) completed a sentence-picture matching task that manipulated word order (canonical vs. noncanonical) and semantic plausibility (plausible vs. less plausible). Analyses focused on accuracy and aimed to identify sentence types that best discriminate the groups. Additionally, we explored which sentence type serves as the best predictor of aphasia severity. RESULTS PWA demonstrated greater difficulties in processing less plausible sentences than plausible ones compared to the controls. Across the groups, noncanonical and less plausible sentences elicited lower accuracy than canonical and plausible sentences. Notably, the accuracy of PWA and control groups differed in noncanonical and less plausible sentences. Additionally, aphasia severity significantly correlated with less plausible sentences. CONCLUSION Even in languages with flexible word order, PWA find it challenging to process sentences with noncanonical syntactic structures and less plausible semantic roles.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jee Eun Sung
- Department of Communication Disorders, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Gayle DeDe
- Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Jimin Park
- Department of Communication Disorders, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, South Korea
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Charalambous M, Phylactou P, Antoniou E, Christodoulou M, Kambanaros M. The Adaptation of the Communicative Effectiveness Index (CETI) into Greek: A Reliability and Validity Study. Brain Sci 2024; 14:689. [PMID: 39061429 PMCID: PMC11274578 DOI: 10.3390/brainsci14070689] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/13/2024] [Revised: 07/01/2024] [Accepted: 07/07/2024] [Indexed: 07/28/2024] Open
Abstract
The Communicative Effectiveness Index (CETI) is an informant rating scale designed to measure changes in functional communication in people with aphasia (PWA) from the carer's perspective. It offers a comprehensive view of aphasia's impact on everyday communication situations, aiding clinicians in designing personalized intervention plans. The aim of this study was to translate and adapt the CETI into Greek (CETI-GR) and validate its psychometric properties. The CETI-GR was translated into Greek using back-translation. A pilot and a content validity study ensured its acceptability. The study involved 30 people with aphasia and 30 carers. The CETI-GR's psychometric properties were evaluated, including internal consistency, test-retest reliability, inter-rater reliability, and validity measures. The CETI-GR demonstrated excellent internal consistency (Cronbach's α > 0.95) and excellent inter-rater reliability (ICC ≥ 0.93). Excellent consistency was revealed when testing the CETI responses given only by PWA (α = 0.91) versus their carers (α = 0.97). Test-retest reliability was high (ICC = 0.88). Significant correlations between the CETI-GR and measures of language severity, functional communication, and quality of life supported convergent validity. The CETI-GR is a reliable tool for assessing functional communication in chronic aphasia. Its Greek adaptation enhances aphasia rehabilitation, enabling person-centered care and improving the quality of life for people with aphasia and carers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marina Charalambous
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Cyprus University of Technology, Limassol 3041, Cyprus; (M.C.); (E.A.); (M.C.)
| | - Phivos Phylactou
- School of Physical Therapy, University of Western Ontario, London, ON N6G 3K7, Canada;
- The Gray Centre for Mobility and Activity, Parkwood Institute, London, ON N6A 4V2, Canada
| | - Eleftheria Antoniou
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Cyprus University of Technology, Limassol 3041, Cyprus; (M.C.); (E.A.); (M.C.)
| | - Maria Christodoulou
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Cyprus University of Technology, Limassol 3041, Cyprus; (M.C.); (E.A.); (M.C.)
| | - Maria Kambanaros
- The Brain and Neurorehabilitation Lab, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Cyprus University of Technology, Limassol 3041, Cyprus
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Hilari K, Roper A, Northcott S, Behn N. Telehealth practice in aphasia: A survey of UK speech and language therapists, with a focus on assessment. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LANGUAGE & COMMUNICATION DISORDERS 2024; 59:1296-1307. [PMID: 38156767 DOI: 10.1111/1460-6984.12996] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2023] [Accepted: 12/01/2023] [Indexed: 01/03/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Evidence suggests telehealth in speech and language therapy can enhance access to care, cost-effectiveness and satisfaction. However, little is known about use of telehealth in the United Kingdom. Moreover, many assessments/outcome measures for aphasia have been tested for face-to-face administration only, posing challenges to reliable use within the telehealth context. We explored the experiences and views of speech and language therapists (SLTs) working with people with aphasia on using telehealth to conduct assessments/outcome measures, perceived barriers and facilitators in telehealth, and their priorities for research in telehealth aphasia assessment. METHOD We explored views of UK SLTs through an online cross-sectional survey (2021) delivered through the Qualtrics platform. The survey covered three main areas: (i) participant demographics; (ii) experience of using telehealth and doing telehealth assessments with people with aphasia post-stroke during the COVID-19 pandemic; and (iii) plans for telehealth post-pandemic. Response formats included yes/no, multiple choice, 5-point Likert scales and open-ended text responses. The survey was expected to take no more than 10 min to complete. Survey data were analysed through descriptive statistics and content analysis of open-ended questions. RESULTS One hundred twenty-four SLTs responded to the survey. The majority (>80%) used telehealth during the COVID-19 pandemic and >90% planned to continue to use telehealth in the future. The most used platforms were Zoom, Microsoft Teams and Attend Anywhere. Access to internet and telehealth platforms, and practical problems (e.g., difficulties sharing resources online, limited functionality of telehealth platforms for assessment) were common barriers. Therapists highlighted that training, resources and materials that assist the administration of assessments were important. Most participants responded that there was a need for existing measures to be tested for administration via telehealth (n = 68, 70.8%). Participants overall felt there was a need for online interactive assessments, more online resources that have been trialled for use via telehealth, accessible formats for resources for people with aphasia and clear instructions for how people with aphasia can access resources. CONCLUSIONS This study provides new insights into the current use of telehealth assessment with people with aphasia in the United Kingdom and directions for future research. Barriers and facilitators identified can support the implementation of telehealth assessment in SLT services. WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS What is already known on the subject The use of telehealth in speech and language therapy has advantages in terms of access to care, cost-effectiveness and satisfaction with care. However, little is known about the use of telehealth in aphasia rehabilitation in the United Kingdom, especially in the area of assessment and outcome measurement. What this paper adds to existing knowledge This study identified that the majority (>80%) of aphasia therapists used telehealth during the COVID-19 pandemic and >90% planned to continue to use telehealth in the future. A need was identified for existing measures to be tested for administration via telehealth and for training, resources (e.g., online interactive assessments) and materials (e.g., accessible formats for people with aphasia). What are the potential or actual clinical implications of this work? To facilitate the successful implementation of telehealth assessment, there is a need for measures validated for use via telehealth and more online resources that have been trialled for use via telehealth.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katerina Hilari
- Centre for Language and Communication Science Research, School of Health and Psychological Sciences, City, University of London, London, UK
| | - Abi Roper
- Centre for Language and Communication Science Research, School of Health and Psychological Sciences, City, University of London, London, UK
| | - Sarah Northcott
- Centre for Language and Communication Science Research, School of Health and Psychological Sciences, City, University of London, London, UK
| | - Nicholas Behn
- Centre for Language and Communication Science Research, School of Health and Psychological Sciences, City, University of London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Dipper L, Devane N, Barnard R, Botting N, Boyle M, Cockayne L, Hersh D, Magdalani C, Marshall J, Swinburn K, Cruice M. A feasibility randomised waitlist-controlled trial of a personalised multi-level language treatment for people with aphasia: The remote LUNA study. PLoS One 2024; 19:e0304385. [PMID: 38875279 PMCID: PMC11178191 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0304385] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2023] [Accepted: 05/10/2024] [Indexed: 06/16/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Stroke survivors with aphasia want to improve their everyday talking (discourse). In current UK practice, 90% of speech and language therapists believe discourse assessment and treatment is part of their role but are hampered by barriers in resources, time and expertise. There is a clinical need for well-articulated discourse assessment and treatments. LUNA is a multi-level treatment targeting words, sentences and discourse macrostructure in personal stories that addresses this clinical need. OBJECTIVES This study aimed to assess the feasibility and acceptability of LUNA trial procedures in a randomised waitlist-controlled trial; and to evaluate preliminary efficacy. METHODS This paper reports a phase II, waitlist-controlled, proof-of-concept feasibility trial. Participants with chronic aphasia (n = 28) were recruited from the community and randomised to an Immediate (n = 14) or Delayed (n = 14) group. LUNA treatment was delivered twice weekly for 10 weeks via the videoconferencing technology, Zoom. Feasibility was assessed in terms of participant recruitment and retention, adherence, missing data, and treatment fidelity. Preliminary treatment efficacy was assessed in terms of between group differences in outcome measures relating to discourse, language, and psychosocial state. RESULTS The remote LUNA trial was feasible: 85% of those eligible consented to the trial; trial retention was 86%; 87% of treatment sessions were delivered as scheduled, and 79% of participants completed 80%+ of the treatment programme; data was missing only for participants who withdrew; treatment fidelity was high at 92% adherence; and only one clinical outcome measure demonstrated ceiling effects. ANCOVA analysis of the clinical outcome measures revealed group differences with medium and large effect sizes, indicating, improvements in the production of words, sentences, discourse macrostructure, overall language functioning (WAB-R), and psychosocial state (VAMS) following LUNA treatment. For most outcomes measured, similar treatment benefits were suggested in a secondary, non-parametric analysis. CONCLUSIONS Large-scale evaluation of the clinical efficacy and cost-effectiveness of LUNA is warranted and supported by these findings. TRIAL REGISTRATION Clinical trials registration: NCT05847023 (clinical trials.gov).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lucy Dipper
- Department of Language and Communication Science, School of Health and Psychological Sciences, City, University of London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Niamh Devane
- Department of Language and Communication Science, School of Health and Psychological Sciences, City, University of London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Rachel Barnard
- Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Nicola Botting
- Department of Language and Communication Science, School of Health and Psychological Sciences, City, University of London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Mary Boyle
- Montclair State University, Montclair, New Jersey, United States of America
| | - Lin Cockayne
- Department of Language and Communication Science, School of Health and Psychological Sciences, City, University of London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Deborah Hersh
- Curtin School of Allied Health and EnAble Institute, Curtin University, Perth, Australia
| | - Carla Magdalani
- Department of Language and Communication Science, School of Health and Psychological Sciences, City, University of London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Jane Marshall
- Department of Language and Communication Science, School of Health and Psychological Sciences, City, University of London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Kate Swinburn
- Department of Language and Communication Science, School of Health and Psychological Sciences, City, University of London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Madeline Cruice
- Department of Language and Communication Science, School of Health and Psychological Sciences, City, University of London, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Mitchell C, Woodward-Nutt K, Dancer A, Taylor S, Bugler J, Bowen A, Conroy P, Whelan BM, Wallace SJ, El Kouaissi S, Kirkham J. Towards a core outcome set for dysarthria after stroke: What should we measure? Clin Rehabil 2024; 38:802-810. [PMID: 38374687 PMCID: PMC11059832 DOI: 10.1177/02692155241231929] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2023] [Accepted: 01/26/2024] [Indexed: 02/21/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To identify and agree on what outcome domains should be measured in research and clinical practice when working with stroke survivors who have dysarthria. DESIGN Delphi process, two rounds of an online survey followed by two online consensus meetings. SETTING UK and Australia. PARTICIPANTS Stroke survivors with experience of dysarthria, speech and language therapists/pathologists working in stroke and communication researchers. METHODS Initial list of outcome domains generated from existing literature and with our patient and public involvement group to develop the survey. Participants completed two rounds of this survey to rate importance. Outcomes were identified as 'in', 'unclear' or 'out' from the second survey. All participants were invited to two consensus meetings to discuss these results followed by voting to identify critically important outcome domains for a future Core Outcome Set. All outcomes were voted on in the consensus meetings and included if 70% of meeting participants voted 'yes' for critically important. RESULTS In total, 148 surveys were fully completed, and 28 participants attended the consensus meetings. A core outcome set for dysarthria after stroke should include four outcome domains: (a) intelligibility of speech, (b) ability to participate in conversations, (c) living well with dysarthria, (d) skills and knowledge of communication partners (where relevant). CONCLUSIONS We describe the consensus of 'what' speech outcomes after stroke are valued by all stakeholders including those with lived experience. We share these findings to encourage the measurement of these domains in clinical practice and research and for future research to identify 'how' best to measure these outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claire Mitchell
- Division of Psychology, Communication & Human Neuroscience, Geoffrey Jefferson Brain Research Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Kate Woodward-Nutt
- Research and Innovation, Northern Care Alliance, Salford Royal Hospital, Salford, UK
| | - Annette Dancer
- Healing, Empowering and Recovering from Dysarthria, HEARD group, Patient Public Involvement, Manchester, UK
| | - Stephen Taylor
- Healing, Empowering and Recovering from Dysarthria, HEARD group, Patient Public Involvement, Manchester, UK
| | - Joe Bugler
- Healing, Empowering and Recovering from Dysarthria, HEARD group, Patient Public Involvement, Manchester, UK
| | - Audrey Bowen
- Division of Psychology & Mental Health, Geoffrey Jefferson Brain Research Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Paul Conroy
- School of Linguistic, Speech and Communication Sciences, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Brooke-Mai Whelan
- School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, The University of Queensland, Saint Lucia, QLD, Australia
| | - Sarah J Wallace
- School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, The University of Queensland, Saint Lucia, QLD, Australia
- Queensland Aphasia Research Centre, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
- Surgical Treatment and Rehabilitation Service (STARS) Education and Research Alliance, The University of Queensland and Metro North Health, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Sabrina El Kouaissi
- Division of Psychology, Communication & Human Neuroscience, Geoffrey Jefferson Brain Research Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Jamie Kirkham
- Centre for Biostatistics, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Lee S, Faroqi-Shah Y. A Meta-Analysis of Anomia Treatment in Bilingual Aphasia: Within- and Cross-Language Generalization and Predictors of the Treatment Outcomes. JOURNAL OF SPEECH, LANGUAGE, AND HEARING RESEARCH : JSLHR 2024; 67:1558-1600. [PMID: 38629966 PMCID: PMC11087086 DOI: 10.1044/2024_jslhr-23-00026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2023] [Revised: 09/15/2023] [Accepted: 01/14/2024] [Indexed: 05/09/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE The present meta-analysis investigated the efficacy of anomia treatment in bilingual and multilingual persons with aphasia (BPWAs) by assessing the magnitudes of six anomia treatment outcomes. Three of the treatment outcomes pertained to the "trained language": improvement of trained words (treatment effect [TE]), within-language generalization of semantically related untrained words (WLG-Related), and within-language generalization of unrelated words (WLG-Unrelated). Three treatment outcomes were for the "untrained language": improvement of translations of the trained words (cross-language generalization of trained words [CLG-Tx]), cross-language generalization of semantically related untrained words (CLG-Related), and cross-language generalization of unrelated untrained words (CLG-Unrelated). This study also examined participant- and treatment-related predictors of these treatment outcomes. METHOD This study is registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) under the number CRD42023418147. Nine electronic databases were searched to identify word retrieval treatment studies of poststroke BPWAs of at least 6 months postonset. Pre- and posttreatment single-word naming scores were extracted for each eligible participant and used to calculate effect sizes (within-case Cohen's d) of the six treatment outcomes. Random-effects meta-analyses were conducted to assess weighted mean effect sizes of the treatment outcomes across studies. Multiple linear regression analyses were used to examine the effects of participant-related variables (pretreatment single-word naming and comprehension representing poststroke lexical processing abilities) and treatment-related variables (type, language, and duration). The methodological quality of eligible studies and the risk of bias in this meta-analysis were assessed. RESULTS A total of 17 published studies with 39 BPWAs were included in the meta-analysis. The methodological quality of the included studies ranged from fair (n = 4) to good (n = 13). Anomia treatment produced a medium effect size for TE (M = 8.36) and marginally small effect sizes for WLG-Related (M = 1.63), WLG-Unrelated (M = 0.68), and CLG-Tx (M = 1.56). Effect sizes were nonsignificant for CLG-Related and CLG-Unrelated. TE was significantly larger than the other five types of treatment outcomes. TE and WLG-Related effect sizes were larger for BPWAs with milder comprehension or naming impairments and for treatments of longer duration. WLG-Unrelated was larger when BPWAs received phonological treatment than semantic and mixed treatments. The overall risk of bias in the meta-analysis was low with a potential risk of bias present in the study identification process. CONCLUSIONS Current anomia treatment practices for bilingual speakers are efficacious in improving trained items but produce marginally small within-language generalization and cross-language generalization to translations of the trained items. These results highlight the need to provide treatment in each language of BPWAs and/or investigate other approaches to promote cross-language generalization. Furthermore, anomia treatment outcomes are influenced by BPWAs' poststroke single-word naming and comprehension abilities as well as treatment duration and the provision of phonological treatment. SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.25595712.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Seongsil Lee
- Department of Hearing and Speech Sciences, University of Maryland, College Park
| | - Yasmeen Faroqi-Shah
- Department of Hearing and Speech Sciences, University of Maryland, College Park
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Volkmer A, Copland DA, Henry ML, Warren JD, Varley R, Wallace SJ, Hardy CJ. COS-PPA: protocol to develop a core outcome set for primary progressive aphasia. BMJ Open 2024; 14:e078714. [PMID: 38719304 PMCID: PMC11086495 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-078714] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2023] [Accepted: 03/19/2024] [Indexed: 05/12/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The term primary progressive aphasia (PPA) describes a group of language-led dementias. Disease-modifying treatments that delay, slow or reverse progression of PPA are currently lacking, though a number of interventions to manage the symptoms of PPA have been developed in recent years. Unfortunately, studies exploring the effectiveness of these interventions have used a variety of different outcome measures, limiting comparability. There are more constructs, apart from word retrieval, that are important for people with PPA that have not received much attention in the research literature. Existing core outcome sets (COS) for dementia and non-progressive aphasia do not meet the needs of people with PPA, highlighting a need to develop a specific COS for PPA. METHODS AND ANALYSIS This protocol describes a three-stage study to identify a COS for PPA interventions in research and clinical practice. The stage 1 systematic review will identify existing speech, language and communication measures used to examine the effectiveness of interventions for PPA in the research literature. Employing a nominal group technique, stage 2 will identify the most important outcomes for people with PPA and their families. The data collected in stages 1 and 2 will be jointly analysed with the project PPI group and will inform the stage 2 modified Delphi consensus study to identify a core outcome measurement set for PPA among a range of research disciplines undertaking intervention studies for people with PPA. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION Ethical approval for stage 2 of the study has been sought individually in each country at collaborating institutions and is stated in detail in the manuscript. Stage 3 has been granted ethical approval by the Chairs of UCL Language and Cognition Department Ethics, Project ID LCD-2023-06. Work undertaken at stages 1, 2 and 3 will be published in open-access peer-reviewed journal articles and presented at international scientific conferences. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER CRD42022367565.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Volkmer
- Department of Psychology and Language Sciences, University College London, London, UK
| | - David A Copland
- Queensland Aphasia Research Centre, School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, The University of Queensland, Saint Lucia, Queensland, Australia
- Surgical Treatment and Rehabilitation Service (STARS) Education and Research Alliance, The University of Queensland and Metro North Health, St Lucia, Queensland, Australia
| | - Maya L Henry
- Departments of Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences and Neurology, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, USA
| | - Jason D Warren
- Dementia Research Centre, University College London, London, UK
| | - Rosemary Varley
- Department of Psychology and Language Sciences, University College London, London, UK
| | - Sarah J Wallace
- Queensland Aphasia Research Centre, School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, The University of Queensland, Saint Lucia, Queensland, Australia
- Surgical Treatment and Rehabilitation Service (STARS) Education and Research Alliance, The University of Queensland and Metro North Health, St Lucia, Queensland, Australia
| | - Chris Jd Hardy
- Dementia Research Centre, University College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Kodani Y, Sekine K, Tanaka Y, Nagami S, Nakamura K, Fukunaga S, Nakamura H. A study on the reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the Scenario Test for people with chronic stroke-induced aphasia: A cross-sectional study. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LANGUAGE & COMMUNICATION DISORDERS 2024. [PMID: 38691670 DOI: 10.1111/1460-6984.13040] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2023] [Accepted: 04/15/2024] [Indexed: 05/03/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Scenario Test is recognised for its effectiveness in assessing the interactive aspects of functional communication in people with post-stroke aphasia (PWA). AIMS To develop a Japanese version of the Scenario Test (Scenario Test-JP) and assess its reliability and validity. METHODS & PROCEDURES Among 66 participants, we selected 61 individuals: 34 PWA and 27 healthy controls (HCs). We modified the Scenario Test-JP based on the UK version and subsequently evaluated its reliability (internal consistency, test-retest and intra-rater and inter-rater reliabilities) and validity (convergent and discriminant) by comparing PWA and HCs. OUTCOMES & RESULTS The Scenario Test-JP showed strong reliability with a Cronbach's α of 0.93, test-retest reliability with an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) of 0.97, intra-rater reliability with an ICC of 0.95-1.00, and inter-rater reliability with an ICC of 0.96. The validity of the test was confirmed with concurrent scores ranging from ρ = 0.37 to 0.76 (p < 0.05) and known-groups validity (p < 0.001, r = -0.56). CONCLUSIONS & IMPLICATIONS The reliability and validity of the Scenario Test-JP align with those of the original Dutch version and the UK and Greek versions. Additionally, the assessment can now include extended alternative communication methods, such as digital devices, indicating the potential of the Scenario Test-JP for modern Japanese speech-language therapy. WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS What is already known on the subject Interactive communication is a facet of functional communication and is crucial for evaluating engagement and participation of people with aphasia (PWA) in speech-language therapy. The Scenario Test provides valuable information for planning speech-language treatment strategies by assessing dialogic communication. What this study adds This study describes the development of the Scenario Test-JP for use with Japanese speakers and Japanese PWA, which is adapted from the Scenario Test UK version. This study evaluated the reliability and validity of this assessment tool and provided supporting evidence. What are the clinical implications of this work? The reliability and validity of the Scenario Test-JP were consistent with those of the Dutch, UK and Greek versions. The Scenario Test-JP contributes to speech-language therapy in Japan, where high-quality support for the activities and participation of PWA is required. PRACTITIONER POINTS Insights from the Scenario Test The Scenario Test plays a crucial role in evaluating the functional communication skills of people with post-stroke aphasia (PWA). Enhancing functional communication has been linked to improved social engagement among PWA, which in turn influences their overall quality of life (QOL). Issues addressed by the Scenario Test The Scenario Test aids in delineating rehabilitation objectives for activities and participation among PWA, particularly concerning functional communication. The test facilitates tailored support for PWAs' interactive communication and forms the foundation for appropriate speech-language therapy interventions. Transformation of speech-language therapy (SLT) in Japan through the introduction of the Scenario Test-JP The integration of the Scenario Test-JP could enhance the SLT services provided to PWA in Japan. With Japan experiencing an unprecedented ageing population, the prevalence of social isolation and diminished QOL resulting from communication disorders like stroke-induced aphasia is expected to rise. Consequently, the SLT rehabilitation sector in Japan is actively seeking effective interventions to support functional communication among PWA. Hence, the adoption of the Scenario Test-JP is anticipated to streamline the evaluation of functional communication, facilitating the judicious selection and timely provision of assistance to PWA in SLT, including guidance on communication partner support and communication skill training.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuhei Kodani
- Department of Speech and Hearing Sciences, Faculty of Rehabilitation, Kawasaki University of Medical Welfare, Kurashiki, Okayama, Japan
- Graduate School of Health and Welfare Sciences, Okayama Prefectural University, Soja, Okayama, Japan
| | - Kazuki Sekine
- School of Human Sciences, Waseda University, Tokorozawa, Saitama, Japan
| | - Yasuhiro Tanaka
- Department of Psychological Sciences, Aichi Gakuin University, Iwasakicho, Nisshin, Aichi, Japan
| | - Shinsuke Nagami
- Department of Communication Disorders, School of Rehabilitation Sciences, Health Sciences University of Hokkaido, Ishikari-gun, Hokkaido, Japan
| | - Katsuya Nakamura
- Department of Speech and Hearing Sciences, Faculty of Rehabilitation, Kawasaki University of Medical Welfare, Kurashiki, Okayama, Japan
| | - Shinya Fukunaga
- Department of Speech and Hearing Sciences, Faculty of Rehabilitation, Kawasaki University of Medical Welfare, Kurashiki, Okayama, Japan
| | - Hikaru Nakamura
- Graduate School of Health and Welfare Sciences, Okayama Prefectural University, Soja, Okayama, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Bueno‐Guerra N, Provencio M, Tarifa‐Rodríguez A, Navarro A, Sempere‐Iborra C, Jordi P, de Celis‐Ruiz E, Alonso de Leciñana M, Martín‐Alonso M, Rigual R, Ruiz‐Ares G, Rodríguez‐Pardo J, Virués‐Ortega J, Fuentes B. Impact of post-stroke aphasia on functional communication, quality of life, perception of health and depression: A case-control study. Eur J Neurol 2024; 31:e16184. [PMID: 38095330 PMCID: PMC11235649 DOI: 10.1111/ene.16184] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/05/2023] [Revised: 11/06/2023] [Accepted: 11/23/2023] [Indexed: 03/14/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Post-stroke aphasia is associated with a reduced quality of life (QoL) and higher risk of depression. Few studies have addressed the effect of coping with aphasia. Our aim is to evaluate the impact of post-stroke aphasia on self-reported QoL and symptoms of depression. METHODS This was a cross-sectional prospective case-control study. Cases involved patients with post-stroke aphasia included in the DULCINEA trial (NCT04289493). Healthy controls were recruited using snowball sampling. All subjects completed the following questionnaires: General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12), Stroke Aphasia Quality of Life Scale (SAQOL-39), Communicative Activity Log (CAL) and Stroke Aphasic Depression Questionnaire (SADQ-10). RESULTS Twenty-three patients (eight women; mean age 62.9 years) and 73 controls (42 women; mean age 53.7 years) were included. Cases scored lower than controls in perception of health (GHQ-12: median 3 [IQR 1; 6] vs. 0 [IQR 0; 2]) and perception of QoL (SAQOL-39: median 3.6 [IQR 3.3; 40] vs. 4.6 [IQR 4.2; 4.8]). Functional communication (CAL: median 135 [IQR 122; 148] vs. 94 [IQR 74; 103]) and SAQOL-39 communication subscale (median 2.7 [IQR 2.1; 3.2] vs. 4.8 [IQR 4.6; 5.0]) were also significantly lower in the case group. Notably, cases reported fewer depressive symptoms than controls (SADQ-10: median 11 [IQR 9; 15] vs. 13 [IQR 11; 16]; p = 0.016). A mediational analysis revealed that the relationship between post-stroke aphasia and depression was not mediated by functional communication. CONCLUSIONS Although communication difficulties impact the QoL of patients with post-stroke aphasia, such patients report fewer depressive symptoms on the SADQ-10 scale than healthy people, with no differences in scores related to social participation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Marta Provencio
- Faculty of PsychologyComillas Pontifical UniversityMadridSpain
| | | | - Ana Navarro
- Faculty of PsychologyComillas Pontifical UniversityMadridSpain
| | | | - Pablo Jordi
- La Paz University Hospital‐Autonomous University of MadridMadridSpain
| | - Elena de Celis‐Ruiz
- Department of Neurology and Stroke UnitHospital La Paz Institute for Health Research‐IdiPAZ (La Paz University Hospital‐Universidad Autónoma de Madrid)MadridSpain
| | - María Alonso de Leciñana
- Department of Neurology and Stroke UnitHospital La Paz Institute for Health Research‐IdiPAZ (La Paz University Hospital‐Universidad Autónoma de Madrid)MadridSpain
| | - Marta Martín‐Alonso
- Speech Therapy Unit, Department of RehabilitationHospital La Paz Institute for Health Research‐IdiPAZ (La Paz University Hospital‐Universidad Autónoma de Madrid)MadridSpain
| | - Ricardo Rigual
- Department of Neurology and Stroke UnitHospital La Paz Institute for Health Research‐IdiPAZ (La Paz University Hospital‐Universidad Autónoma de Madrid)MadridSpain
| | - Gerardo Ruiz‐Ares
- Department of Neurology and Stroke UnitHospital La Paz Institute for Health Research‐IdiPAZ (La Paz University Hospital‐Universidad Autónoma de Madrid)MadridSpain
| | - Jorge Rodríguez‐Pardo
- Department of Neurology and Stroke UnitHospital La Paz Institute for Health Research‐IdiPAZ (La Paz University Hospital‐Universidad Autónoma de Madrid)MadridSpain
| | | | - Blanca Fuentes
- Department of Neurology and Stroke UnitHospital La Paz Institute for Health Research‐IdiPAZ (La Paz University Hospital‐Universidad Autónoma de Madrid)MadridSpain
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Breitenstein C, Wallace SJ, Gilmore N, Finch E, Pettigrove K, Brady MC. Invaluable Benefits of 10 Years of the International Collaboration of Aphasia Trialists (CATs). Stroke 2024; 55:1129-1135. [PMID: 38527148 DOI: 10.1161/strokeaha.124.046487] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2024] [Accepted: 02/13/2024] [Indexed: 03/27/2024]
Abstract
Aphasia research has traditionally been considered a (unidisciplinary) niche topic in medical science. The international Collaboration of Aphasia Trialists (CATs) is a global collaboration of multidisciplinary aphasia researchers. Over the past 10 years, CATs has collectively taken a rigorous approach to systematically address persistent challenges to aphasia research quality. This article summarizes the achievements over the past decade. CATs' achievements include: standardizing terminology, advancing aphasia research design by aphasia expert consensus recommendations, developing a core data set and intervention descriptors, facilitating the involvement of people with the language impairment aphasia in the research process, translating, and adapting assessment tools into global languages, encouraging data sharing, developing innovative secondary data analysis methodologies and promoting the transparency and accessibility of high quality aphasia research reports. CATs' educational and scientific achievements over the past 10 years far exceed what individual researchers in the field could have ever achieved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Sarah J Wallace
- Queensland Aphasia Research Centre, Brisbane, Australia (S.J.W.)
- School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane,
Australia (S.J.W., E.F., M.C.B.)
| | - Natalie Gilmore
- Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA (N.G.)
| | - Emma Finch
- Research and Innovation, West Moreton Health, Ipswich, Australia (E.F.)
- Speech Pathology Department, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Australia (E.F.)
- School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane,
Australia (S.J.W., E.F., M.C.B.)
| | - Kathryn Pettigrove
- Centre of Research Excellence in Aphasia Recovery and Rehabilitation, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia (K.P.)
- School of Allied Health, Human Services and Sport, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia (K.P.)
| | - Marian C Brady
- Nursing, Midwifery and Allied Health Professionals Research Unit, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, United Kingdom (M.C.B.)
- School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane,
Australia (S.J.W., E.F., M.C.B.)
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Harvey S, Stone M, Zingelman S, Copland DA, Kilkenny MF, Godecke E, Cadilhac DA, Kim J, Olaiya MT, Rose ML, Breitenstein C, Shrubsole K, O'Halloran R, Hill AJ, Hersh D, Mainstone K, Mainstone P, Unsworth CA, Brogan E, Short KJ, Burns CL, Baker C, Wallace SJ. Comprehensive quality assessment for aphasia rehabilitation after stroke: protocol for a multicentre, mixed-methods study. BMJ Open 2024; 14:e080532. [PMID: 38514146 PMCID: PMC10961567 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-080532] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2023] [Accepted: 02/27/2024] [Indexed: 03/23/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION People with aphasia following stroke experience disproportionally poor outcomes, yet there is no comprehensive approach to measuring the quality of aphasia services. The Meaningful Evaluation of Aphasia SeRvicES (MEASuRES) minimum dataset was developed in partnership with people with lived experience of aphasia, clinicians and researchers to address this gap. It comprises sociodemographic characteristics, quality indicators, treatment descriptors and outcome measurement instruments. We present a protocol to pilot the MEASuRES minimum dataset in clinical practice, describe the factors that hinder or support implementation and determine meaningful thresholds of clinical change for core outcome measurement instruments. METHODS AND ANALYSIS This research aims to deliver a comprehensive quality assessment toolkit for poststroke aphasia services in four studies. A multicentre pilot study (study 1) will test the administration of the MEASuRES minimum dataset within five Australian health services. An embedded mixed-methods process evaluation (study 2) will evaluate the performance of the minimum dataset and explore its clinical applicability. A consensus study (study 3) will establish consumer-informed thresholds of meaningful change on core aphasia outcome constructs, which will then be used to establish minimal important change values for corresponding core outcome measurement instruments (study 4). ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION Studies 1 and 2 have been registered with the Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trial Registry (ACTRN12623001313628). Ethics approval has been obtained from the Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital (HREC/2023/MNHB/95293) and The University of Queensland (2022/HE001946 and 2023/HE001175). Study findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications, conference presentations and engagement with relevant stakeholders including healthcare providers, policy-makers, stroke and rehabilitation audit and clinical quality registry custodians, consumer support organisations, and individuals with aphasia and their families.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sam Harvey
- Queensland Aphasia Research Centre, The University of Queensland, Saint Lucia, Queensland, Australia
- Surgical, Treatment and Rehabilitation Service Education and Research Alliance, The University of Queensland and Metro North Hospital and Health Service, Herston, Queensland, Australia
| | - Marissa Stone
- Queensland Aphasia Research Centre, The University of Queensland, Saint Lucia, Queensland, Australia
- St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne Pty Ltd, Fitzroy, Victoria, Australia
| | - Sally Zingelman
- Queensland Aphasia Research Centre, The University of Queensland, Saint Lucia, Queensland, Australia
- Surgical, Treatment and Rehabilitation Service Education and Research Alliance, The University of Queensland and Metro North Hospital and Health Service, Herston, Queensland, Australia
| | - David A Copland
- Queensland Aphasia Research Centre, The University of Queensland, Saint Lucia, Queensland, Australia
- Surgical, Treatment and Rehabilitation Service Education and Research Alliance, The University of Queensland and Metro North Hospital and Health Service, Herston, Queensland, Australia
| | - Monique F Kilkenny
- Department of Medicine, School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
- Stroke Theme, The Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Erin Godecke
- School of Medical and Health Sciences, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, Western Australia, Australia
- Centre for Research Excellence in Aphasia Recovery and Rehabilitation, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Dominique A Cadilhac
- Department of Medicine, School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
- Stroke Theme, The Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Joosup Kim
- Stroke Theme, The Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Medicine, School of Clinical Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
| | - Muideen T Olaiya
- Department of Medicine, School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
| | - Miranda L Rose
- Centre for Research Excellence in Aphasia Recovery and Rehabilitation, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- School of Allied Health, Human Services and Sport, La Trobe University College of Science Health and Engineering, Bundoora, Victoria, Australia
| | - Caterina Breitenstein
- Department of Neurology with Institute of Translational Neurology, University of Muenster, Muenster, Germany
| | - Kirstine Shrubsole
- Queensland Aphasia Research Centre, The University of Queensland, Saint Lucia, Queensland, Australia
- Metro South Hospital and Health Service, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Woolloongabba, Queensland, Australia
| | - Robyn O'Halloran
- Centre for Research Excellence in Aphasia Recovery and Rehabilitation, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- School of Allied Health, Human Services and Sport, La Trobe University College of Science Health and Engineering, Bundoora, Victoria, Australia
| | - Annie J Hill
- Centre for Research Excellence in Aphasia Recovery and Rehabilitation, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- School of Allied Health, Human Services and Sport, La Trobe University College of Science Health and Engineering, Bundoora, Victoria, Australia
| | - Deborah Hersh
- Curtin School of Allied Health and EnAble Institute, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
- Australian Aphasia Association, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Kathryn Mainstone
- Queensland Aphasia Research Centre, The University of Queensland, Saint Lucia, Queensland, Australia
| | - Penelope Mainstone
- Queensland Aphasia Research Centre, The University of Queensland, Saint Lucia, Queensland, Australia
| | - Carolyn A Unsworth
- Department of Medicine, School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
- Institute of Health and Wellbeing, Federation University, Ballarat, Victoria, Australia
| | - Emily Brogan
- Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, Western Australia, Australia
- Fiona Stanley Fremantle Hospitals Group, South Metropolitan Health Service, Palmyra, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Kylie J Short
- Surgical, Treatment and Rehabilitation Service Education and Research Alliance, The University of Queensland and Metro North Hospital and Health Service, Herston, Queensland, Australia
| | - Clare L Burns
- Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Metro North Hospital and Health Service, Herston, Queensland, Australia
| | - Caroline Baker
- Centre for Research Excellence in Aphasia Recovery and Rehabilitation, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Speech Pathology Department, Monash Health, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
| | - Sarah J Wallace
- Queensland Aphasia Research Centre, The University of Queensland, Saint Lucia, Queensland, Australia
- Surgical, Treatment and Rehabilitation Service Education and Research Alliance, The University of Queensland and Metro North Hospital and Health Service, Herston, Queensland, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Kim J, Sookram G, Godecke E, Brogan E, Armstrong E, Ellery F, Rai T, Rose ML, Ciccone N, Middleton S, Holland A, Hankey GJ, Bernhardt J, Cadilhac DA. Economic evaluation of the Very Early Rehabilitation in SpEech (VERSE) intervention. Top Stroke Rehabil 2024; 31:157-166. [PMID: 37415422 DOI: 10.1080/10749357.2023.2229039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2023] [Accepted: 06/18/2023] [Indexed: 07/08/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION There is limited evidence on the costs and outcomes of patients with aphasia after stroke. The aim of this study was to estimate costs in patients with aphasia after stroke according to the aphasia therapies provided. METHODS A three-arm, prospective, randomized, parallel group, open-label, blinded endpoint assessment trial conducted in Australia and New Zealand. Usual ward-based care (Usual Care) was compared to additional usual ward-based therapy (Usual Care Plus) and a prescribed and structured aphasia therapy program in addition to Usual Care (the VERSE intervention). Information about healthcare utilization and productivity were collected to estimate costs in Australian dollars for 2017-18. Multivariable regression models with bootstrapping were used to estimate differences in costs and outcomes (clinically meaningful change in aphasia severity measured by the WAB-R-AQ). RESULTS Overall, 202/246 (82%) participants completed follow-up at 26 weeks. Median costs per person were $23,322 (Q1 5,367, Q3 52,669, n = 63) for Usual Care, $26,923 (Q1 7,303, Q3 76,174, n = 70) for Usual Care Plus and $31,143 (Q1 7,001. Q3 62,390, n = 69) for VERSE. No differences in costs and outcomes were detected between groups. Usual Care Plus was inferior (i.e. more costly and less effective) in 64% of iterations, and in 18% was less costly and less effective compared to Usual Care. VERSE was inferior in 65% of samples and less costly and less effective in 12% compared to Usual Care. CONCLUSION There was limited evidence that additional intensively delivered aphasia therapy within the context of usual acute care provided was worthwhile in terms of costs for the outcomes gained.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Kim
- Stroke and Ageing Research, Department of Medicine, School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Monash University, Clayton, Australia
- Stroke Division, Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, Heidelberg, Australia
| | - G Sookram
- Health Economics Unit, Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, Canberra, Australia
| | - E Godecke
- School of Medical and Health Sciences, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, Australia
- Speech Pathology Department, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Perth, Australia
| | - E Brogan
- School of Medical and Health Sciences, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, Australia
- Speech Pathology Department, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Perth, Australia
| | - E Armstrong
- School of Medical and Health Sciences, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, Australia
| | - F Ellery
- Stroke Division, Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, Heidelberg, Australia
| | - T Rai
- School of Mathematical and Physical Sciences, University of Technology NSW, Broadway, Australia
| | - M L Rose
- School of Allied Health, Human Services and Sport, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - N Ciccone
- School of Medical and Health Sciences, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, Australia
| | - S Middleton
- Nursing Research Institute, Australian Catholic University, Darlinghurst, Australia
| | - A Holland
- University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA
| | - G J Hankey
- Medical School, University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia
- Perron Institute for Neurological and Translational Science, The University of Western Australia, Nedlands, Australia
| | - J Bernhardt
- Stroke Division, Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, Heidelberg, Australia
| | - D A Cadilhac
- Stroke and Ageing Research, Department of Medicine, School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Monash University, Clayton, Australia
- Stroke Division, Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, Heidelberg, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Hall Z, Elbourn E, Togher L, Carragher M. Co-constructed communication therapy for individuals with acquired brain injury: A systematic review. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LANGUAGE & COMMUNICATION DISORDERS 2024; 59:496-518. [PMID: 36640114 DOI: 10.1111/1460-6984.12841] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2022] [Accepted: 12/02/2022] [Indexed: 06/17/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Meaningful, varied, joyful conversation is an important therapy target for adults with language or cognitive-communication disorders following acquired brain injury (ABI). However, the complexity of daily communication is often reduced to component parts within intervention programmes, with mixed evidence of generalization to everyday conversation. Interventions targeting co-construction of communication within a dyad offer a structured way in which to retain and treat elements of everyday conversation for individuals and their communication partner (CP). Such interventions exist but they are variably labelled, target different ABI populations and have not been synthesized. AIMS To identify the nature, scope and effects of intervention studies targeting co-constructed communication in adults with ABI. METHOD This systematic review was completed using PRISMA Guidelines. Six databases (MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, Scopus, LLBA, PsychInfo) were searched and 1210 studies were screened. Data were extracted and studies were rated for methodological quality and completeness of reporting. Outcome measures and effects of treatment were collated through descriptive synthesis. MAIN CONTRIBUTION This review highlights an emerging evidence base in relation to an intervention approach that targets everyday communication. Co-constructed communication interventions have been reported by 13 studies, from a total of 206 participants with post-stroke aphasia, traumatic brain injury and progressive language impairments. These interventions take a range of formats, including referential communication tasks, retell/recount therapies and communication training programmes. Methodological quality evaluation indicated mostly low-level study designs. Heterogeneity was identified in primary outcome measures, with 28 unique primary outcome measures reported across studies. Most studies demonstrated change in task-specific or broad communication outcome measures. CONCLUSIONS Co-constructed communication interventions may offer clinicians a systematic, protocolized, replicable way to target everyday communication for adults with ABI. More high-quality, experimental designs with complete reporting and psychometrically sound outcome measures are needed to strengthen the evidence base. WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS What is already known on this subject Everyday conversation is an important therapy target for adults with ABI, but there is mixed evidence of therapy gains generalizing to everyday life. Many interventions reduce conversation to component parts such as naming or sentence construction. A different approach is needed to capture the social, dyadic, interactive and multifaceted nature of conversation. We propose the term 'co-constructed communication interventions' as a therapy genre targeting semi-structured dialogue. These interventions retain elements of everyday conversation (such as multimodal communication and situating tasks within dyads), combined with experimental elements (where stimuli prompt interactions and responses can be scored against normative data). What this paper adds to existing knowledge This review proposes and describes a distinct genre of discourse intervention within the current evidence base with a novel operational definition of 'co-constructed communication'. What are the potential or actual clinical implications of this work? Co-constructed communication interventions directly target elements of everyday communication by situating the therapy goals within a dyadic, interactive, multimodal task. A range of intervention tasks have been identified, including collaborative storytelling and problem-solving. This review will be of interest to clinicians working with adults with ABI; co-constructed communication interventions may offer a useful, replicable way to target aspects of everyday communication. This synthesis of the current evidence base encourages clinicians' informed, evidence-based decisions around these interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zali Hall
- The Centre of Research Excellence in Aphasia Recovery and Rehabilitation, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Allied Health, Human Services and Sport, La Trobe University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Elise Elbourn
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Leanne Togher
- The Centre of Research Excellence in Aphasia Recovery and Rehabilitation, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Marcella Carragher
- The Centre of Research Excellence in Aphasia Recovery and Rehabilitation, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Allied Health, Human Services and Sport, La Trobe University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Li B, Deng S, Zhuo B, Sang B, Chen J, Zhang M, Tian G, Zhang L, Du Y, Zheng P, Yue G, Meng Z. Effect of Acupuncture vs Sham Acupuncture on Patients With Poststroke Motor Aphasia: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Netw Open 2024; 7:e2352580. [PMID: 38252438 PMCID: PMC10804271 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.52580] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2023] [Accepted: 11/30/2023] [Indexed: 01/23/2024] Open
Abstract
Importance Motor aphasia is common among patients with stroke. Acupuncture is recommended as an alternative therapy for poststroke aphasia, but its efficacy remains uncertain. Objective To investigate the effects of acupuncture on language function, neurological function, and quality of life in patients with poststroke motor aphasia. Design, Setting, and Participants This multicenter, sham-controlled, randomized clinical trial was conducted in 3 tertiary hospitals in China from October 21, 2019, to November 13, 2021. Adult patients with poststroke motor aphasia were enrolled. Data analysis was performed from February to April 2023. Interventions Eligible participants were randomly allocated (1:1) to manual acupuncture (MA) or sham acupuncture (SA) groups. Both groups underwent language training and conventional treatments. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary outcomes were the aphasia quotient (AQ) of the Western Aphasia Battery (WAB) and scores on the Chinese Functional Communication Profile (CFCP) at 6 weeks. Secondary outcomes included WAB subitems, Boston Diagnostic Aphasia Examination, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale, Stroke-Specific Quality of Life Scale, Stroke and Aphasia Quality of Life Scale-39, and Health Scale of Traditional Chinese Medicine scores at 6 weeks and 6 months after onset. All statistical analyses were performed according to the intention-to-treat principle. Results Among 252 randomized patients (198 men [78.6%]; mean [SD] age, 60.7 [7.5] years), 231 were included in the modified intention-to-treat analysis (115 in the MA group and 116 in the SA group). Compared with the SA group, the MA group had significant increases in AQ (difference, 7.99 points; 95% CI, 3.42-12.55 points; P = .001) and CFCP (difference, 23.51 points; 95% CI, 11.10-35.93 points; P < .001) scores at week 6 and showed significant improvements in AQ (difference, 10.34; 95% CI, 5.75-14.93; P < .001) and CFCP (difference, 27.43; 95% CI, 14.75-40.10; P < .001) scores at the end of follow-up. Conclusions and Relevance In this randomized clinical trial, patients with poststroke motor aphasia who received 6 weeks of MA compared with those who received SA demonstrated statistically significant improvements in language function, quality of life, and neurological impairment from week 6 of treatment to the end of follow-up at 6 months after onset. Trial Registration Chinese Clinical Trial Registry: ChiCTR1900026740.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Boxuan Li
- National Clinical Research Center for Chinese Medicine Acupuncture and Moxibustion, Tianjin, China
- First Teaching Hospital of Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin, China
- Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin, China
| | - Shizhe Deng
- National Clinical Research Center for Chinese Medicine Acupuncture and Moxibustion, Tianjin, China
- First Teaching Hospital of Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin, China
| | - Bifang Zhuo
- National Clinical Research Center for Chinese Medicine Acupuncture and Moxibustion, Tianjin, China
- First Teaching Hospital of Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin, China
- Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin, China
| | - Bomo Sang
- Air Force Medical Center of People’s Liberation Army, Beijing, China
| | - Junjie Chen
- National Clinical Research Center for Chinese Medicine Acupuncture and Moxibustion, Tianjin, China
- First Teaching Hospital of Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin, China
- Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin, China
| | - Menglong Zhang
- National Clinical Research Center for Chinese Medicine Acupuncture and Moxibustion, Tianjin, China
- First Teaching Hospital of Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin, China
- Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin, China
| | - Guang Tian
- National Clinical Research Center for Chinese Medicine Acupuncture and Moxibustion, Tianjin, China
- First Teaching Hospital of Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin, China
| | - Lili Zhang
- National Clinical Research Center for Chinese Medicine Acupuncture and Moxibustion, Tianjin, China
- First Teaching Hospital of Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin, China
| | - Yuzheng Du
- National Clinical Research Center for Chinese Medicine Acupuncture and Moxibustion, Tianjin, China
- First Teaching Hospital of Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin, China
| | - Peng Zheng
- Changchun University of Chinese Medicine, Changchun, China
| | - Gonglei Yue
- Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Shandong, China
| | - Zhihong Meng
- National Clinical Research Center for Chinese Medicine Acupuncture and Moxibustion, Tianjin, China
- First Teaching Hospital of Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin, China
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Marte MJ, Peñaloza C, Kiran S. The cognate facilitation effect on lexical access in bilingual aphasia: Evidence from the Boston Naming Test. BILINGUALISM (CAMBRIDGE, ENGLAND) 2023; 26:1009-1025. [PMID: 38239589 PMCID: PMC10794022 DOI: 10.1017/s1366728923000251] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/22/2024]
Abstract
Most cognate research suggests facilitation effects in picture naming, but how these effects manifest in bilinguals after brain damage remains unclear. Additionally, whether this effect is captured in clinical measures is largely unknown. Using data from the Boston Naming Test, we examined the naming of cognates and noncognates, the extent of cognate facilitation produced, and the individual differences in bilingual language experience associated with naming outcomes in forty Spanish-English bilingual persons with aphasia (BPWA) relative to thirty-one Spanish-English healthy bilinguals (HB). Results suggest that naming performance in L1 and L2 in both groups is modulated by lexical frequency, bilingual language experience, and by language impairment in BPWA. Although the two groups showed similarities, they deviated in benefit drawn from the extent of phoneme/grapheme overlap in cognate items. HB showed an association between cognate facilitation and bilingual language experience, while cognate facilitation in BPWA was only associated with L2 language impairment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Manuel Jose Marte
- Department of Speech, Language, & Hearing Sciences, Sargent College of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Boston University, 635 Commonwealth Avenue, Boston, MA 02215, USA
| | - Claudia Peñaloza
- Department of Cognition, Development and Educational Psychology, Faculty of Psychology, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
- Institute of Neurosciences, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
- Cognition and Brain Plasticity Unit, Bellvitge Biomedical Research Institute-IDIBELL, L’Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Swathi Kiran
- Department of Speech, Language, & Hearing Sciences, Sargent College of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Boston University, 635 Commonwealth Avenue, Boston, MA 02215, USA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Devane N, Behn N, Marshall J, Ramachandran A, Wilson S, Hilari K. The use of virtual reality in the rehabilitation of aphasia: a systematic review. Disabil Rehabil 2023; 45:3803-3822. [PMID: 36326199 DOI: 10.1080/09638288.2022.2138573] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2022] [Revised: 10/10/2022] [Accepted: 10/16/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE This systematic review explored how virtual reality (VR) has been used to rehabilitate aphasia. MATERIALS AND METHODS Empirical studies were included where VR was used to target language, well-being, or quality of life in adults with acquired language impairment. Degenerative communication disabilities were excluded. Seven health databases were searched in October 2021. Risk of Bias was assessed using published checklists and completeness of intervention reporting evaluated. Narrative synthesis described forms of VR, rationales given, outcome measures, communication functions targeted, characteristics of interventions, and outcomes achieved within the framework of impairment, activity, and participation. RESULTS Fourteen studies, involving 229 participants, met the criteria. The studies employed four forms of VR with various rationales given. Interventions used published and novel protocols. Primary outcomes targeted language impairment (12/14), activity (1/14), and well-being (1/14) and achieved positive outcomes in impairment and activity. All studies were exploratory. Risk of bias was high. Findings are discussed in the context of gains achieved by VR in other health contexts and the multi-user gaming literature. CONCLUSIONS Uses of VR in aphasia rehabilitation described in the literature are limited. Most applications target the remediation of language impairments. Opportunities to address activity, participation, and wider aspects of well-being are rare.IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATIONResearch documenting the use of virtual reality (VR) to rehabilitate aphasia is limited and exploratory, so does not yet offer clear guidance for clinicians.Many of the identified studies have used known published protocols (e.g., naming therapy or scripts therapy) delivered through the novel VR format and focus on language impairment outcomes.VR offers clinicians a unique opportunity to address communication activity and participation through the use of multi-user virtual worlds, but this has only been explored by only two research teams.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Niamh Devane
- Division of Language and Communication Science, School of Health and Psychological Sciences, City University of London, London, UK
| | - Nicholas Behn
- Division of Language and Communication Science, School of Health and Psychological Sciences, City University of London, London, UK
| | - Jane Marshall
- Division of Language and Communication Science, School of Health and Psychological Sciences, City University of London, London, UK
| | - Aparna Ramachandran
- Division of Health Services Research and Management, School of Health and Psychological Sciences, City University of London, London, UK
| | - Stephanie Wilson
- Centre for Human-Computer Design, School of Mathematics, Computer Science and Engineering, City University of London, London, UK
| | - Katerina Hilari
- Division of Language and Communication Science, School of Health and Psychological Sciences, City University of London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Raymer AM, Roitsch J. Effectiveness of Constraint-Induced Language Therapy for Aphasia: Evidence From Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY 2023; 32:2393-2401. [PMID: 36668725 DOI: 10.1044/2022_ajslp-22-00248] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/17/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Constraint-induced language therapy (CILT) is an aphasia treatment that incorporates neuroplasticity principles of forced verbal use and high-intensity training to facilitate language recovery in individuals with stroke-induced aphasia (Pulvermüller et al., 2001). The burgeoning CILT literature has led to systematic reviews (SRs) that summarize treatment results. In this project, we appraised the quality and examined findings reported in several SRs to draw conclusions about the effectiveness of CILT. METHOD We searched multiple databases for SRs that summarized CILT research for poststroke aphasia. We identified six SRs, among which three summarized findings qualitatively and three included meta-analysis (MA) to quantify results. We rated each SR for methodologic quality using the A MeaSurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR 2; Shea et al., 2017) and extracted findings across the six SRs. RESULTS Two reviewers reliably applied the AMSTAR 2 to the six SRs. Although the six SRs generally were conducted with satisfactory rigor, each was lacking two or more critical domains. Descriptive summaries in SRs reported positive effects of CILT for language and communication measures. However, the three MAs showed that effects of CILT often did not surpass those of comparison treatments for naming, comprehension, and repetition measures. MA findings were positive in a review that included all research designs and evaluated treatment effects for trained naming items. Generalized CILT effects for standardized language measures were limited in two other MAs. CONCLUSIONS CILT led to improvements in a variety of language and communication measures. When compared with intensive multimodality treatments, CILT effects were similar, suggesting that training intensity may be the potent factor in CILT outcomes. Future SRs should be implemented with increased rigor across quality rating scale domains to increase confidence in conclusions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anastasia M Raymer
- Department of Communication Disorders and Special Education, Old Dominion University, Norfolk, VA
| | - Jane Roitsch
- Department of Communication Disorders, University of Nebraska-Kearney
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Faroqi-Shah Y. A reconceptualization of sentence production in post-stroke agrammatic aphasia: the synergistic processing bottleneck model. FRONTIERS IN LANGUAGE SCIENCES 2023; 2:1118739. [PMID: 39175803 PMCID: PMC11340809 DOI: 10.3389/flang.2023.1118739] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/24/2024]
Abstract
The language production deficit in post-stroke agrammatic aphasia (PSA-G) tends to result from lesions to the left inferior frontal gyrus (LIFG) and is characterized by a triad of symptoms: fragmented sentences, errors in functional morphology, and a dearth of verbs. Despite decades of research, the mechanisms underlying production patterns in PSA-G have been difficult to characterize. Two major impediments to progress may have been the view that it is a purely morphosyntactic disorder and the (sometimes overzealous) application of linguistic theory without interceding psycholinguistic evidence. In this paper, empirical evidence is examined to present an integrated portrait of language production in PSA-G and to evaluate the assumption of a syntax-specific syndrome. In light of extant evidence, it is proposed that agrammatic language production results from a combination of morphosyntactic, phonomotor, and processing capacity limitations that cause a cumulative processing bottleneck at the point of articulatory planning. This proposed Synergistic Processing Bottleneck model of PSA-G presents a testable framework for future research. The paper ends with recommendations for future research on PSA-G.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yasmeen Faroqi-Shah
- Department of Hearing and Speech Sciences, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Tilton-Bolowsky VE, Brock L, Nunn K, Evans WS, Vallila-Rohter S. Incorporating Metacognitive Strategy Training Into Semantic Treatment Promotes Restitutive and Substitutive Gains in Naming: A Single-Subject Investigation. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY 2023; 32:1979-2020. [PMID: 37433115 PMCID: PMC10561971 DOI: 10.1044/2023_ajslp-22-00230] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2022] [Revised: 10/22/2022] [Accepted: 02/17/2023] [Indexed: 07/13/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE This study tested the effectiveness of a modified semantic feature analysis (SFA) treatment protocol that incorporated metacognitive strategy training (MST). Regarding its restitutive component, SFA most reliably results in improved word retrieval for treated items and untreated, semantically related items, but evidence of response generalization is often small/inconsistent. Regarding its substitutive component, SFA is thought to facilitate successful communication via habituation of the SFA circumlocution strategy. However, repeated practice with SFA's strategy in the absence of direct MST may not result in independent strategy use and/or generalization. Furthermore, people with aphasia's independent use of the SFA strategy in moments of anomia is presently underreported. To address these limitations, we incorporated MST into SFA and directly measured substitutive outcomes. METHOD Four people with aphasia participated in 24 treatment sessions of SFA + MST in a single-subject, A-B experimental design with repeated measurements. We measured word retrieval accuracy, strategy use, and explicit strategy knowledge. We calculated effect sizes to measure changes in word retrieval accuracy and strategy use and used visual inspection to assess gains in explicit strategy knowledge from pre- to posttreatment and retention. RESULTS Participants achieved marginally small to medium effects in word retrieval accuracy for treated; untreated, semantically related; and untreated, semantically unrelated items and marginally small to large effects in independent strategy use. Explicit strategy knowledge was variable. CONCLUSIONS Across participants, SFA + MST yielded positive changes in word retrieval accuracy or strategy use, or both. Positive changes in word retrieval accuracy were comparable to other SFA studies. Positive changes in strategy use demonstrate preliminary evidence of this treatment's ability to yield restitutive and substitutive gains. Overall, this study offers preliminary evidence of SFA + MST's effectiveness and highlights the importance of directly measuring SFA's substitutive outcomes, which showed that people with aphasia can respond to this treatment in multiple successful ways-not just improved target word production.
Collapse
|
24
|
Zhu D, Qi Z, Wang A, Zhang Y, Yu H. Emerging Validation for the Adapted Chinese Version of Quick Aphasia Battery. J Multidiscip Healthc 2023; 16:2557-2566. [PMID: 37667799 PMCID: PMC10475279 DOI: 10.2147/jmdh.s417810] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2023] [Accepted: 08/10/2023] [Indexed: 09/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose The quick aphasia battery (QAB) was designed to evaluate language disorder from multi-dimension efficiently, which had been translated into several languages but lacked in Chinese. This study conducted cross-cultural adaption for the Chinese version and verified its psychometric properties. Material and Methods First, the Chinese Version of quick aphasia battery (CQAB) was adapted following WHO literature guidelines with steps of forward translation, expert panel, back-translation, pre-test, and interview, then develop the final version. Second, the psychometric properties tests were conducted in 128 post-stroke patients to identify if aphasia happens and verify the validity and reliability of CQAB. Results The Cronbach's alpha coefficient of the CQAB is 0.962, test-retest reliability 0.849, and inter-rater reliability 0.998. Content validity 0.917, KMO 0.861, exploratory factor analysis extracted 2 factors named "language understanding" and "language program", cumulative variance contribution rate is 91.588% >50%. Calibration association validity 0.977. Sensitivity 0.977, specificity 0.932, with the optimal cutoff point is 8.86. Conclusion The study supported CQAB, which adapted following standardized guidelines, is reliable and effective to assess language impairment in post-stroke patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dan Zhu
- School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, 200082, People’s Republic of China
- Department of Pediatric, Shanghai United Family Healthcare, Shanghai, 200050, People’s Republic of China
- Department of Nursing, Shanghai East Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200120, People’s Republic of China
| | - Zhi Qi
- School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, 200082, People’s Republic of China
- Department of Neurology, Shanghai Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Shanghai, 200438, People’s Republic of China
| | - Aili Wang
- School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, 200082, People’s Republic of China
- Department of Pediatric, Shanghai United Family Healthcare, Shanghai, 200050, People’s Republic of China
| | - Yongqing Zhang
- School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, 200082, People’s Republic of China
| | - Haiping Yu
- Department of Nursing, Shanghai East Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200120, People’s Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
de Lima Ramos R, Bahia MM, Flamand-Roze C, Chun RYS. Brazilian Portuguese Adaptation and Validation of the Language Screening Test for Poststroke Patients. JOURNAL OF SPEECH, LANGUAGE, AND HEARING RESEARCH : JSLHR 2023; 66:2296-2315. [PMID: 37410632 DOI: 10.1044/2023_jslhr-22-00611] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is a lack of standardized assessment tools for poststroke aphasia in Brazil, particularly bedside screenings for early identification of patients with suspected language disorders. The Language Screening Test (LAST) is a valid and reliable method for screening hospitalized patients following a stroke. This tool was first developed in French and then translated and validated in other languages. PURPOSE This study aimed to translate, culturally adapt, and validate the LAST into Brazilian Portuguese. METHOD Following a systematic, multistep approach to translation and cultural adaptation of language instruments, this study developed the two parallel versions of the Brazilian Portuguese LAST (pLAST) Versions A and B. The final versions were applied to 70 healthy and 30 poststroke adults across age and educational levels. Subtests of the Boston Diagnostic Aphasia Examination (BDAE) were used to assess the external validity of the pLAST. RESULTS Findings showed that the two versions (A and B) of the pLAST were equivalent (intraclass correlation coefficient = .91; p < .001). No floor or ceiling effects were observed, and internal validity was excellent (Cronbach's α = .85). Moreover, its external validity against the BDAE was moderate to strong. Test sensitivity and specificity were 0.88 and 1, respectively, and accuracy was 0.96. CONCLUSION The Brazilian Portuguese version of the LAST is a valid, simple, easy, and rapid test to screen poststroke aphasia in hospital settings. SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.23548911.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Renata de Lima Ramos
- Department of Human Development and Rehabilitation, University of Campinas, SP, Brazil
| | - Mariana M Bahia
- Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Syracuse University, NY
| | - Constance Flamand-Roze
- Department of Neurology, Centre Hospitalier Sud-Francilien, Paris Sud University, Corbeil-Essonnes, France
| | - Regina Yu Shon Chun
- Department of Human Development and Rehabilitation, University of Campinas, SP, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Dávila G, Torres-Prioris MJ, López-Barroso D, Berthier ML. Turning the Spotlight to Cholinergic Pharmacotherapy of the Human Language System. CNS Drugs 2023; 37:599-637. [PMID: 37341896 PMCID: PMC10374790 DOI: 10.1007/s40263-023-01017-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/24/2023] [Indexed: 06/22/2023]
Abstract
Even though language is essential in human communication, research on pharmacological therapies for language deficits in highly prevalent neurodegenerative and vascular brain diseases has received little attention. Emerging scientific evidence suggests that disruption of the cholinergic system may play an essential role in language deficits associated with Alzheimer's disease and vascular cognitive impairment, including post-stroke aphasia. Therefore, current models of cognitive processing are beginning to appraise the implications of the brain modulator acetylcholine in human language functions. Future work should be directed further to analyze the interplay between the cholinergic system and language, focusing on identifying brain regions receiving cholinergic innervation susceptible to modulation with pharmacotherapy to improve affected language domains. The evaluation of language deficits in pharmacological cholinergic trials for Alzheimer's disease and vascular cognitive impairment has thus far been limited to coarse-grained methods. More precise, fine-grained language testing is needed to refine patient selection for pharmacotherapy to detect subtle deficits in the initial phases of cognitive decline. Additionally, noninvasive biomarkers can help identify cholinergic depletion. However, despite the investigation of cholinergic treatment for language deficits in Alzheimer's disease and vascular cognitive impairment, data on its effectiveness are insufficient and controversial. In the case of post-stroke aphasia, cholinergic agents are showing promise, particularly when combined with speech-language therapy to promote trained-dependent neural plasticity. Future research should explore the potential benefits of cholinergic pharmacotherapy in language deficits and investigate optimal strategies for combining these agents with other therapeutic approaches.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Guadalupe Dávila
- Cognitive Neurology and Aphasia Unit, Centro de Investigaciones Médico-Sanitarias, University of Malaga, Marqués de Beccaria 3, 29010, Malaga, Spain
- Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Malaga-IBIMA, Malaga, Spain
- Department of Psychobiology and Methodology of Behavioral Sciences, Faculty of Psychology and Speech Therapy, University of Malaga, Malaga, Spain
- Language Neuroscience Research Laboratory, Faculty of Psychology and Speech Therapy, University of Malaga, Malaga, Spain
| | - María José Torres-Prioris
- Cognitive Neurology and Aphasia Unit, Centro de Investigaciones Médico-Sanitarias, University of Malaga, Marqués de Beccaria 3, 29010, Malaga, Spain
- Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Malaga-IBIMA, Malaga, Spain
- Department of Psychobiology and Methodology of Behavioral Sciences, Faculty of Psychology and Speech Therapy, University of Malaga, Malaga, Spain
- Language Neuroscience Research Laboratory, Faculty of Psychology and Speech Therapy, University of Malaga, Malaga, Spain
| | - Diana López-Barroso
- Cognitive Neurology and Aphasia Unit, Centro de Investigaciones Médico-Sanitarias, University of Malaga, Marqués de Beccaria 3, 29010, Malaga, Spain
- Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Malaga-IBIMA, Malaga, Spain
- Department of Psychobiology and Methodology of Behavioral Sciences, Faculty of Psychology and Speech Therapy, University of Malaga, Malaga, Spain
- Language Neuroscience Research Laboratory, Faculty of Psychology and Speech Therapy, University of Malaga, Malaga, Spain
| | - Marcelo L Berthier
- Cognitive Neurology and Aphasia Unit, Centro de Investigaciones Médico-Sanitarias, University of Malaga, Marqués de Beccaria 3, 29010, Malaga, Spain.
- Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Malaga-IBIMA, Malaga, Spain.
- Language Neuroscience Research Laboratory, Faculty of Psychology and Speech Therapy, University of Malaga, Malaga, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Wallace SJ, Worrall L, Rose TA, Alyahya RSW, Babbitt E, Beeke S, de Beer C, Bose A, Bowen A, Brady MC, Breitenstein C, Bruehl S, Bryant L, Cheng BBY, Cherney LR, Conroy P, Copland DA, Croteau C, Cruice M, Dipper L, Hilari K, Howe T, Kelly H, Kiran S, Laska A, Marshall J, Murray LL, Patterson J, Pearl G, Quinting J, Rochon E, Rose ML, Rubi‐Fessen I, Sage K, Simmons‐Mackie N, Visch‐Brink E, Volkmer A, Webster J, Whitworth A, Dorze GL. Measuring communication as a core outcome in aphasia trials: Results of the ROMA-2 international core outcome set development meeting. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LANGUAGE & COMMUNICATION DISORDERS 2023; 58:1017-1028. [PMID: 36583427 PMCID: PMC10946976 DOI: 10.1111/1460-6984.12840] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2022] [Accepted: 12/08/2022] [Indexed: 06/17/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Evidence-based recommendations for a core outcome set (COS; minimum set of outcomes) for aphasia treatment research have been developed (the Research Outcome Measurement in Aphasia-ROMA, COS). Five recommended core outcome constructs: communication, language, quality of life, emotional well-being and patient-reported satisfaction/impact of treatment, were identified through three international consensus studies. Constructs were paired with outcome measurement instruments (OMIs) during an international consensus meeting (ROMA-1). Before the current study (ROMA-2), agreement had not been reached on OMIs for the constructs of communication or patient-reported satisfaction/impact of treatment. AIM To establish consensus on a communication OMI for inclusion in the ROMA COS. METHODS & PROCEDURES Research methods were based on recommendations from the Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials (COMET) Initiative. Participants with expertise in design and conduct of aphasia trials, measurement instrument development/testing and/or communication outcome measurement were recruited through an open call. Before the consensus meeting, participants agreed on a definition of communication, identified appropriate OMIs, extracted their measurement properties and established criteria for their quality assessment. During the consensus meeting they short-listed OMIs and participants without conflicts of interest voted on the two most highly ranked instruments. Consensus was defined a priori as agreement by ≥ 70% of participants. OUTCOMES & RESULTS In total, 40 researchers from nine countries participated in ROMA-2 (including four facilitators and three-panel members who participated in pre-meeting activities only). A total of 20 OMIs were identified and evaluated. Eight short-listed communication measures were further evaluated for their measurement properties and ranked. Participants in the consensus meeting (n = 33) who did not have conflicts of interest (n = 29) voted on the top two ranked OMIs: The Scenario Test (TST) and the Communication Activities of Daily Living-3 (CADL-3). TST received 72% (n = 21) of 'yes' votes and the CADL-3 received 28% (n = 8) of 'yes' votes. CONCLUSIONS & IMPLICATIONS Consensus was achieved that TST was the preferred communication OMI for inclusion in the ROMA COS. It is currently available in the original Dutch version and has been adapted into English, German and Greek. Further consideration must be given to the best way to measure communication in people with mild aphasia. Development of a patient-reported measure for satisfaction with/impact of treatment and multilingual versions of all OMIs of the COS is still required. Implementation of the ROMA COS would improve research outcome measurement and the quality, relevance, transparency, replicability and efficiency of aphasia treatment research. WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS What is already known on this subject International consensus has been reached on five core constructs to be routinely measured in aphasia treatment studies. International consensus has also been established for OMIs for the three constructs of language, quality of life and emotional well-being. Before this study, OMIs for the constructs of communication and patient-reported satisfaction/impact of treatment were not established. What this paper adds to existing knowledge We gained international consensus on an OMI for the construct of communication. TST is recommended for inclusion in the ROMA COS for routine use in aphasia treatment research. What are the potential or actual clinical implications of this work? The ROMA COS recommends OMIs for a minimum set of outcomes for adults with post-stroke aphasia within phases I-IV aphasia treatment research. Although not intended for clinical use, clinicians may employ the instruments of the ROMA COS, considering the quality of their measurement properties. The systematic inclusion of a measure of communication, such as TST, in clinical practice could ultimately support the implementation of research evidence and best practices.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah J. Wallace
- School of Health and Rehabilitation SciencesThe University of QueenslandBrisbaneQLDAustralia
- Queensland Aphasia Research CentreBrisbaneQLDAustralia
- Centre of Research Excellence in Aphasia Recovery and RehabilitationAustralia
| | - Linda Worrall
- School of Health and Rehabilitation SciencesThe University of QueenslandBrisbaneQLDAustralia
- Queensland Aphasia Research CentreBrisbaneQLDAustralia
- Centre of Research Excellence in Aphasia Recovery and RehabilitationAustralia
| | - Tanya A. Rose
- School of Health and Rehabilitation SciencesThe University of QueenslandBrisbaneQLDAustralia
- Queensland Aphasia Research CentreBrisbaneQLDAustralia
| | - Reem S. W. Alyahya
- Communication and Swallowing Disorders DepartmentKing Fahad Medical CityRiyadhSaudi Arabia
- School of Health and Psychological Sciences, CityUniversity of LondonLondonUK
| | - Edna Babbitt
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Feinberg School of MedicineNorthwestern UniversityChicagoILUSA
| | - Suzanne Beeke
- Deparment of Psychology and Language SciencesUniversity College LondonLondonUK
| | - Carola de Beer
- Faculty of Linguistics and Literary Studies & Medical School OWLUniversity of BielefeldBielefeldGermany
| | - Arpita Bose
- School of Psychology and Clinical Language SciencesUniversity of ReadingReadingUK
| | - Audrey Bowen
- Geoffrey Jefferson Brain Research Centre, The Manchester Academic Health Science CentreNorthern Care Alliance & University of ManchesterManchesterUK
| | - Marian C. Brady
- Nursing, Midwifery and Allied Health Professionals Research UnitGlasgow Caledonian UniversityGlasgowUK
| | - Caterina Breitenstein
- Department of Neurology with Institute of Translational NeurologyUniversity of MünsterMünsterGermany
| | - Stefanie Bruehl
- St. Mauritius Rehabilitation Centre, Meerbusch, Germany
- Medical Faculty, Heinrich‐Heine University Duesseldorf, Duesseldorf, Germany
- Clinical and Cognitive NeurosciencesDepartment of Neurology, RWTH Aachen UniversityGermany
| | - Lucy Bryant
- University of Technology Sydney Graduate School of Health, Faculty of HealthSydneyNSWAustralia
| | - Bonnie B. Y. Cheng
- School of Health and Rehabilitation SciencesThe University of QueenslandBrisbaneQLDAustralia
- Queensland Aphasia Research CentreBrisbaneQLDAustralia
- Centre of Research Excellence in Aphasia Recovery and RehabilitationAustralia
| | - Leora R. Cherney
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Feinberg School of MedicineNorthwestern UniversityChicagoILUSA
| | - Paul Conroy
- Geoffrey Jefferson Brain Research Centre, The Manchester Academic Health Science CentreNorthern Care Alliance & University of ManchesterManchesterUK
| | - David A. Copland
- School of Health and Rehabilitation SciencesThe University of QueenslandBrisbaneQLDAustralia
- Queensland Aphasia Research CentreBrisbaneQLDAustralia
- Centre of Research Excellence in Aphasia Recovery and RehabilitationAustralia
| | - Claire Croteau
- School of Speech–Language Pathology and Audiology, Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation of Greater MontrealFaculty of Medicine, Université de MontréalMontrealQCCanada
| | - Madeline Cruice
- School of Health and Psychological Sciences, CityUniversity of LondonLondonUK
| | - Lucy Dipper
- School of Health and Psychological Sciences, CityUniversity of LondonLondonUK
| | - Katerina Hilari
- School of Health and Psychological Sciences, CityUniversity of LondonLondonUK
| | - Tami Howe
- School of Audiology and Speech SciencesUniversity of British ColumbiaVancouverBCCanada
| | - Helen Kelly
- School of Clinical TherapiesUniversity College CorkCorkIreland
| | - Swathi Kiran
- Department of Speech, Language, and Hearing SciencesBoston UniversityBostonMAUSA
| | - Ann‐Charlotte Laska
- Department of Clinical SciencesKarolinska Institutet Danderyd HospitalStockholmSweden
| | - Jane Marshall
- School of Health and Psychological Sciences, CityUniversity of LondonLondonUK
| | - Laura L. Murray
- School of Communication Sciences and DisordersWestern UniversityLondonONCanada
| | - Janet Patterson
- Research ServiceVA Northern California Health Care SystemMartinezCAUSA
| | - Gill Pearl
- Speakeasy Specialist Aphasia CentreBuryUK
| | - Jana Quinting
- Speech Language Pathology, Department of Rehabilitation and Special Education, Faculty of Human SciencesUniversity of CologneCologneGermany
| | - Elizabeth Rochon
- Department of Speech–Language Pathology and Rehabilitation Sciences InstituteUniversity of TorontoToronto, ONCanada
| | - Miranda L. Rose
- Queensland Aphasia Research CentreBrisbaneQLDAustralia
- School of Allied Health, Human Services and SportLa Trobe UniversityBundooraVICAustralia
| | - Ilona Rubi‐Fessen
- Speech Language Pathology, Department of Rehabilitation and Special Education, Faculty of Human SciencesUniversity of CologneCologneGermany
- RehaNova Rehabilitation HospitalCologneGermany
| | - Karen Sage
- Faculty of Health and EducationManchester Metropolitan UniversityManchesterUK
| | - Nina Simmons‐Mackie
- Communication Sciences & DisordersSoutheastern Louisiana UniversityHammondLAUSA
| | - Evy Visch‐Brink
- Department of NeurologyErasmus UniversityRotterdamthe Netherlands
| | - Anna Volkmer
- Deparment of Psychology and Language SciencesUniversity College LondonLondonUK
| | - Janet Webster
- School of Education, Communication and Language SciencesNewcastle UniversityNewcastle upon TyneUK
| | - Anne Whitworth
- School of Health SciencesCollege of Health and MedicineUniversity of TasmaniaHobartAustralia
| | - Guylaine Le Dorze
- School of Speech–Language Pathology and Audiology, Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation of Greater MontrealFaculty of Medicine, Université de MontréalMontrealQCCanada
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Berthier ML, Dávila G. Pharmacotherapy for post-stroke aphasia: what are the options? Expert Opin Pharmacother 2023; 24:1221-1228. [PMID: 37263978 DOI: 10.1080/14656566.2023.2221382] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/07/2023] [Accepted: 05/31/2023] [Indexed: 06/03/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Aphasia is a common, long-lasting aftermath of stroke lesions. There is an increased integration of pharmacotherapy as an adjunctive strategy to speech and language therapy (SLT) for post-stroke aphasia (PSA). Nevertheless, more research in pharmacotherapy for acute and chronic PSA is necessary, including the election of drugs that target different neurotransmitter systems and deficits in specific language domains. AREAS COVERED This article updates the role of pharmacotherapy for PSA, focusing the spotlight on some already investigated drugs and candidate agents deserving of future research. Refining the precision of drug election would require using multimodal biomarkers to develop personalized treatment approaches. There is a solid need to devise feasible randomized controlled trials adapted to the particularities of the PSA population. The emergent role of multimodal interventions combining one or two drugs with noninvasive brain stimulation to augment SLT is emphasized. EXPERT OPINION Pharmacotherapy can improve language deficits not fully alleviated by SLT. In addition, the 'drug-only' approach can also be adopted when administering SLT is not possible. The primary goal of pharmacotherapy is reducing the overall aphasia severity, although targeting language-specific deficits (i.e. naming, spoken output) also contributes to improving functional communication. Unfortunately, there is still little information for recommending a drug for specific language deficits.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marcelo L Berthier
- Cognitive Neurology and Aphasia Unit, Centro de Investigaciones Médico-Sanitarias, University of Malaga, Malaga, Spain
- Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Malaga - IBIMA, Malaga, Spain
| | - Guadalupe Dávila
- Cognitive Neurology and Aphasia Unit, Centro de Investigaciones Médico-Sanitarias, University of Malaga, Malaga, Spain
- Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Malaga - IBIMA, Malaga, Spain
- Language Neuroscience Research Laboratory, Faculty of Psychology and Speech Therapy, University of Malaga, Malaga, Spain
- Department of Psychobiology and Methodology of Behavioral Sciences, Faculty of Psychology and Speech Therapy, University of Malaga, Malaga, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Ter Wal N, van Ewijk L, Dijkhuis L, Visser-Meily JMA, Terwee CB, Gerrits E. Everyday Barriers in Communicative Participation According to People With Communication Problems. JOURNAL OF SPEECH, LANGUAGE, AND HEARING RESEARCH : JSLHR 2023; 66:1033-1050. [PMID: 36787154 DOI: 10.1044/2022_jslhr-22-00405] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/18/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The purpose of this study was to gain a comprehensive understanding of participation situations that are challenging for people with communication problems, to provide input for the further development of potential items for the Communicative Participation Item Bank (CPIB). METHOD A purposive sampling strategy was used to include a diverse group of people with communication problems. Diaries were used as a sensitizing exercise for inductive in-depth interviews. In these interviews, elements of communicative participation situations (concepts) were elicited that participants themselves experienced as difficult because of their communication problem. A thematic content analysis was used to identify overarching themes. In addition, new items were formulated based on the raw codes of the transcripts and linked to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health Activity and Participation domains to examine the distribution of items across the breadth of the construct of communicative participation. RESULTS Eighteen interviews yielded 44 different concepts. They were clustered in six themes, which capture the person, location, topic, mode, moment, and pace of communication. In total, 103 new items measuring communicative participation were formulated. Most of these items relate to International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health Activity and Participation domains "interpersonal interactions and relationships," "major life areas," and "community, social, and civic life." CONCLUSIONS This study resulted in an overview of self-reported barriers in daily communicative participation experienced by people with communication problems. These communicative participation situations can be captured within 44 concepts, which are covered by six themes. Future work should investigate if the newly written items can be added to the CPIB. The concepts and the themes can be used in designing and delivering a participation-focused intervention for this population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicole Ter Wal
- Research Centre Healthy and Sustainable Living, HU University of Applied Sciences Utrecht, the Netherlands
- Department of Languages, Literature and Communication, Institute for Language Sciences (ILS), Utrecht University, the Netherlands
| | - Lizet van Ewijk
- Research Centre Healthy and Sustainable Living, HU University of Applied Sciences Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Lotti Dijkhuis
- Research Centre Healthy and Sustainable Living, HU University of Applied Sciences Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Johanna M A Visser-Meily
- Department of Rehabilitation, Physical Therapy Science & Sports, UMC Utrecht Brain Centre, University Medical Centre Utrecht, the Netherlands
- Centre of Excellence for Rehabilitation Medicine, UMC Utrecht Brain Centre, University Medical Centre Utrecht and Utrecht University, and De Hoogstraat Rehabilitation, the Netherlands
| | - Caroline B Terwee
- Department of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Ellen Gerrits
- Research Centre Healthy and Sustainable Living, HU University of Applied Sciences Utrecht, the Netherlands
- Department of Languages, Literature and Communication, Institute for Language Sciences (ILS), Utrecht University, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Mallet KH, Shamloul RM, Lecompte-Collin J, Winkel J, Donnelly B, Dowlatshahi D. Telerehab at Home: Mobile Tablet Technology for Patients With Poststroke Communication Deficits-A Pilot Feasibility Randomized Control Trial. JOURNAL OF SPEECH, LANGUAGE, AND HEARING RESEARCH : JSLHR 2023; 66:648-655. [PMID: 36634230 DOI: 10.1044/2022_jslhr-21-00616] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/17/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Poststroke communication deficits (PSCD) are common following stroke. Early and intensive speech and language therapy is recommended to maximize outcomes. We wanted to test the feasibility of providing telerehabilitation for patients with PSCD using mobile tablet-based technology to bridge the gap between acute stroke care and outpatient speech-language therapy (SLT) services. METHOD This was a prospective, randomized, open-label, blinded end-point design. Patients were randomized to either the treatment arm (mobile tablet) or the control arm (standard of care). The study duration was either 8 weeks or when the patient was called to start outpatient SLT services, whichever occurred first. The primary outcome was feasibility, while secondary objective was to assess patient engagement and to explore improvement in communication ability. RESULTS We had a 38% recruitment rate, with a 100% retention rate for the treatment arm and a 50% retention rate for the control arm. Fifty percent of patients in the treatment arm adhered to the recommended 1 hr per day, whereas none of the control arm did. Patients were engaged in using the mobile tablet and feedback on the protocol was positive. CONCLUSIONS SLT using telerehabilitation via mobile technology is feasible in the very early stages of acute stroke recovery. It is potentially an effective means of bridging the gap between discharge from the acute care setting to the start of outpatient SLT services. Our study supported proceeding to a clinical trial to assess efficacy of the intervention. SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.21844569.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karen H Mallet
- Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ontario, Canada
- Champlain Regional Stroke Network, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
- The Ottawa Hospital, Ontario, Canada
- Canadian Partnership for Stroke Recovery, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | | | | | | | - Beth Donnelly
- Champlain Regional Stroke Network, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
- The Ottawa Hospital, Ontario, Canada
| | - Dar Dowlatshahi
- Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ontario, Canada
- The Ottawa Hospital, Ontario, Canada
- Canadian Partnership for Stroke Recovery, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
- University of Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
- Brain and Mind Research Institute, University of Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Differences of Modality Use between Telepractice and Face-to-Face Administration of the Scenario-Test in Persons with Dementia-Related Speech Disorder. Brain Sci 2023; 13:brainsci13020204. [PMID: 36831747 PMCID: PMC9954369 DOI: 10.3390/brainsci13020204] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2022] [Revised: 01/13/2023] [Accepted: 01/23/2023] [Indexed: 01/27/2023] Open
Abstract
Telepractice is increasingly finding its way into the care of people with dementia. Web-based delivery of speech and language therapy (SLT) is feasible and has the potential to improve communication in people with dementia-related speech disorders. Although experts are discussing the strengths and weaknesses of telepractice, a precise analysis of the differences between analogue and digital communication for this heterogeneous group of patients is still missing. The three current single cases investigated verbal and nonverbal aspects of communication in a face-to-face (F2F) and digital setting through a qualitative research design. Using the scenario-test (ST) in person and via big blue button (BBB; video conferencing system), several decisive factors were detected, influencing the effectiveness of communication in a F2F compared to a digital setting. The most important results of the qualitative content analysis are described for each case individually. Additionally, the influence of person-related factors, such as age, diagnosis, presence of depression, and level of education, is presented. Perceptual, executive, and affective disorders, as well as aids of relatives, are considered separately. The results indicate that executive functions, affects, and perceptual deficits need to be taken into account if telepractice is to be applied. Age, education, and distinct forms of dementia might be decisive for successful telepractice as well.
Collapse
|
32
|
COS-Speech: protocol to develop a core outcome set for dysarthria after stroke for use in clinical practice and research. Trials 2023; 24:57. [PMID: 36698201 PMCID: PMC9878925 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-022-06958-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2022] [Accepted: 11/24/2022] [Indexed: 01/26/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Dysarthria after stroke is when speech intelligibility is impaired, and this occurs in half of all stroke survivors. Dysarthria often leads to social isolation, poor psychological well-being and can prevent return to work and social lives. Currently, a variety of outcome measures are used in clinical research and practice when monitoring recovery for people who have dysarthria. When research studies use different measures, it is impossible to compare results from trials and delays our understanding of effective clinical treatments. The aim of this study is to develop a core outcome set (COS) to agree what aspects of speech recovery should be measured for dysarthria after stroke (COS-Speech) in research and clinical practice. METHODS The COS-Speech study will include five steps: (1) development of a long list of possible outcome domains of speech that should be measured to guide the survey; (2) recruitment to the COS-Speech study of three key stakeholder groups in the UK and Australia: stroke survivors, communication researchers and speech and language therapists/pathologists; (3) two rounds of the Delphi survey process; (4) a consensus meeting to agree the speech outcomes to be measured and a follow-up consensus meeting to match existing instruments/measures (from parallel systematic review) to the agreed COS-Speech; (5) dissemination of COS-Speech. DISCUSSION There is currently no COS for dysarthria after stroke for research trials or clinical practice. The findings from this research study will be a minimum COS, for use in all dysarthria research studies and clinical practice looking at post-stroke recovery of speech. These findings will be widely disseminated using professional and patient networks, research and clinical forums as well as using a variety of academic papers, videos, accessible writing such as blogs and links on social media. TRIAL REGISTRATION COS-Speech is registered with the Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials (COMET) database, October 2021 https://www.comet-initiative.org/Studies/Details/1959 . In addition, "A systematic review of the psychometric properties and clinical utility of instruments measuring dysarthria after stroke" will inform the consensus meeting to match measures to COS-Speech. The protocol for the systematic reviews registered with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews. PROSPERO registration number: CRD42022302998 .
Collapse
|
33
|
Kodani Y, Nagami S, Kojima S, Fukunaga S, Nakamura H. Accuracy of rating scales for evaluating aphasic patients' psychological aspects and language function: A scoping review protocol. PLoS One 2023; 18:e0281231. [PMID: 37192215 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0281231] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2023] [Accepted: 04/26/2023] [Indexed: 05/18/2023] Open
Abstract
Aphasia nearly affects half of all poststroke patients. Furthermore, aphasia affects all language functions, well-being, and quality of life of patients. Therefore, rehabilitation of patients with aphasia requires an accurate assessment of language function and psychological aspects. However, assessment scales for language function and psychological aspects of patients with aphasia are said to be inaccurate. In Japan, this sign is more prominent than in English-speaking countries. Therefore, we are putting together a scoping review of research articles published in English and Japanese to date, with the aim of summarizing the accuracy of rating scales for language function and psychological aspects of people with aphasia. The scoping review was intended to be a comprehensive examination of the accuracy of rating scales for people with aphasia. We will search the article databases PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, Web of Science, and the Medical Journal Web (Japan). The observational studies that describe the reliability and validity of the rating scales in adult aphasic after stroke will be searched for. There will be no publication date for the articles that will be searched. We believe that this scoping review aims to assess the accuracy of rating scales used to measure different aspects of aphasia, with a focus on research conducted in English-speaking countries and Japan. By conducting this review, we believe to identify any problems with rating scales used in English and Japanese research and improve their accuracy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuhei Kodani
- Department of Speech Language Pathology and Audiology, Faculty of Rehabilitation, Kawasaki University of Medical Welfare, Kurashiki, Okayama, Japan
| | - Shinsuke Nagami
- Department of Speech Language Pathology and Audiology, Faculty of Rehabilitation, Kawasaki University of Medical Welfare, Kurashiki, Okayama, Japan
| | - Satomi Kojima
- Comprehensive Unit for Health Economic Evidence Review and Decision Support (CHEERS), Research Organization of Science and Technology, Ritsumeikan University, Simogyo-ku, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Shinya Fukunaga
- Department of Speech Language Pathology and Audiology, Faculty of Rehabilitation, Kawasaki University of Medical Welfare, Kurashiki, Okayama, Japan
| | - Hikaru Nakamura
- Department of Contemporary Welfare Science, Faculty of Health and Welfare, Okayama Prefectural University, Souja, Okayama, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Walker GM, Fridriksson J, Hillis AE, den Ouden DB, Bonilha L, Hickok G. The Severity-Calibrated Aphasia Naming Test. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY 2022; 31:2722-2740. [PMID: 36332139 PMCID: PMC9911092 DOI: 10.1044/2022_ajslp-22-00071] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/03/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE We present a 20-item naming test, the Severity-Calibrated Aphasia Naming Test (SCANT), that can serve as a proxy measure for an aphasia severity scale that is derived from a thorough test battery of connected speech production, single-word production, speech repetition, and auditory verbal comprehension. METHOD We use lasso regression and cross-validation to identify an optimal subset from a set of 174 pictures to be named for prediction of aphasia severity, based on data from 200 participants with left-hemisphere stroke who were quasirandomly selected to represent the full impairment scale. Data from 20 healthy controls (i.e., participant caretakers/spouses) were also analyzed. We examine interrater reliability, test-retest reliability, sensitivity and specificity to the presence of aphasia, sensitivity to therapy gains, and external validity (i.e., correlation with aphasia severity measures) for the SCANT. RESULTS The SCANT has extremely high interrater reliability, and it is sensitive and specific to the presence of aphasia. We demonstrate the superiority of predictions based on the SCANT over those based on the full set of naming items. We estimate a 15% reduction in power when using the SCANT score versus the full test battery's aphasia severity score as an outcome measure; for example, to maintain the same power to detect a significant group average change in aphasia severity, a study with 25 participants using the full test battery to measure treatment effectiveness would require 30 participants if the SCANT were to be used as the testing instrument instead. CONCLUSION We provide a linear model to convert SCANT scores to aphasia severity scores, and we identify a change score cutoff of four SCANT items to obtain a high degree of confidence based on test-retest SCANT data and the modeled relation between SCANT and aphasia severity scores. SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.21476871.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Grant M. Walker
- Department of Cognitive Sciences, University of California, Irvine
| | - Julius Fridriksson
- Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of South Carolina, Columbia
| | - Argye E. Hillis
- Departments of Neurology, Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, and Cognitive Science, Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MA
| | - Dirk B. den Ouden
- Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of South Carolina, Columbia
| | | | - Gregory Hickok
- Department of Cognitive Sciences, University of California, Irvine
- Department of Language Science, University of California, Irvine
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Azios JH, Archer B, Simmons-Mackie N, Raymer A, Carragher M, Shashikanth S, Gulick E. Conversation as an Outcome of Aphasia Treatment: A Systematic Scoping Review. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY 2022; 31:2920-2942. [PMID: 36356216 DOI: 10.1044/2022_ajslp-22-00011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Conversation-focused speech-language pathology services are a top priority for people living with aphasia, but little is known about how researchers measure conversation as an outcome of treatment. This scoping review was undertaken to systematically review the evidence regarding the measurement of conversation in aphasia studies and to identify current practices and existing gaps. METHOD A systematic literature search was conducted for studies published between January 1995 and September 2019 in multiple electronic databases. Covidence software was used to manage search results, study selection, and data charting processes. Data were extracted from each study and then collated and organized to elucidate the breadth of approaches, tools, or procedures oriented to measuring conversation as an outcome and identify gaps in the existing literature. RESULTS The systematic search of the literature resulted in 1,244 studies. A total of 64 studies met inclusion criteria and were included in the review. The review summarizes the various tools and procedures used to measure conversation as an outcome of aphasia intervention, including variations in data collection and analysis procedures. The review also evaluates the quality of conversation measures in terms of psychometric properties and informal measures of validity. There was a total of 211 measures used across the 64 studies. CONCLUSIONS While there was no clear measure that was objectively superior, several measures show promise and warrant future exploration. Some of the orientations, conceptualizations, and procedures we have presented can be seen as options that might be included in a future conversation-focused core outcome set. SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.21514062.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jamie H Azios
- Department of Communicative Disorders, University of Louisiana at Lafayette
| | - Brent Archer
- Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Bowling Green State University, OH
| | - Nina Simmons-Mackie
- Department of Health & Human Sciences, Southeastern Louisiana University, Hammond
| | - Anastasia Raymer
- Department of Communication Disorders & Special Education, Old Dominion University, Norfolk, VA
| | - Marcella Carragher
- School of Allied Health, Human Services and Sport, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Centre for Research Excellence in Aphasia Recovery and Rehabilitation, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Shriya Shashikanth
- Department of Communicative Disorders, University of Louisiana at Lafayette
| | - Eleanor Gulick
- Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Bowling Green State University, OH
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Wallace SE, Patterson J, Purdy M, Knollman-Porter K, Coppens P. Auditory Comprehension Interventions for People With Aphasia: A Scoping Review. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY 2022; 31:2404-2420. [PMID: 36252946 DOI: 10.1044/2022_ajslp-21-00297] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE This scoping review examined studies reporting restorative treatments designed to improve auditory comprehension in people with aphasia. METHOD We searched eight databases using keywords aphasia, auditory comprehension, treatment, intervention, and rehabilitation, for studies published between 1970 and 2020. Searches returned 170 records, and after applying exclusionary criteria, 28 articles remained. For each article, two authors independently extracted data on study design parameters, participant characteristics, treatment protocol, and treatment outcomes, including generalization. RESULTS Studies were categorized by treatment focus: direct auditory (n = 7), mixed auditory (n = 13), or indirect (n = 8). Study designs were group (n = 12), single-subject experimental design (n = 11), or case study (n = 5). Fifteen studies had a control condition and/or a control group. Thirteen studies included two to 10 participants. Aphasia severity and auditory comprehension severity were infrequently reported, and most participants were greater than 1-year poststroke. Treatment targets and tasks varied. Sessions ranged from 8 to 240 min, once or more per week, for eight to 60 total sessions over 2-20 weeks. Impairment-based outcome measures were typically used. Improvement and generalization were regularly reported; however, authors frequently did not report statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS A variety of treatments have addressed auditory comprehension deficits in people with aphasia, with many reporting improvements in auditory comprehension for some people. However, the variability in treatment tasks and delivery and outcome measurements preclude confidently offering specific clinical recommendations for implementing auditory comprehension treatments. Gaps identified by the current study may guide the development and exploration of transparent, repeatable, patient-centered treatments. SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.21291345.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah E Wallace
- Department of Communication Science and Disorders, University of Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Janet Patterson
- Research Service, VA Northern California Health Care System, Martinez
| | - Mary Purdy
- Department of Communication Disorders, Southern Connecticut State University, New Haven
| | | | - Patrick Coppens
- Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, State University of New York College at Plattsburgh
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Wallace SJ, Isaacs M, Ali M, Brady MC. Establishing reporting standards for participant characteristics in post-stroke aphasia research: An international e-Delphi exercise and consensus meeting. Clin Rehabil 2022; 37:199-214. [DOI: 10.1177/02692155221131241] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Objective To establish international, multidisciplinary expert consensus on minimum participant characteristic reporting standards in aphasia research (DESCRIBE project). Methods An international, three-round e-Delphi exercise and consensus meeting, involving multidisciplinary researchers, clinicians and journal editors working academically or clinically in the field of aphasia. Results Round 1 of the DESCRIBE e-Delphi exercise ( n = 156) generated 113 items, 20 of which reached consensus by round 3. The final consensus meeting ( n = 19 participants) established DESCRIBE's 14 participant characteristics that should be reported in aphasia studies: age; years of education; biological sex; language of treatment/testing; primary language; languages used; history of condition(s) known to impact communication/cognition; history of previous stroke; lesion hemisphere; time since onset of aphasia; conditions arising from the neurological event; and, for communication partner participants, age, biological sex and relationship to person with aphasia. Each characteristic has been defined and matched with standard response options to enable consistent reporting. Conclusion Aphasia research studies should report the 14 DESCRIBE participant characteristics as a minimum. Consistent adherence to the DESCRIBE minimum reporting standard will reduce research wastage and facilitate evidence-based aphasia management by enabling replication and collation of research findings, and translation of evidence into practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah J Wallace
- School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
- Queensland Aphasia Research Centre, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Megan Isaacs
- School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
- Queensland Aphasia Research Centre, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Myzoon Ali
- NMAHP Research Unit, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, Scotland
| | - Marian C Brady
- School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
- NMAHP Research Unit, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, Scotland
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Kristinsson S, Busby N, Rorden C, Newman-Norlund R, den Ouden DB, Magnusdottir S, Hjaltason H, Thors H, Hillis AE, Kjartansson O, Bonilha L, Fridriksson J. Brain age predicts long-term recovery in post-stroke aphasia. Brain Commun 2022; 4:fcac252. [PMID: 36267328 PMCID: PMC9576153 DOI: 10.1093/braincomms/fcac252] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2022] [Revised: 07/25/2022] [Accepted: 10/03/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
The association between age and language recovery in stroke remains unclear. Here, we used neuroimaging data to estimate brain age, a measure of structural integrity, and examined the extent to which brain age at stroke onset is associated with (i) cross-sectional language performance, and (ii) longitudinal recovery of language function, beyond chronological age alone. A total of 49 participants (age: 65.2 ± 12.2 years, 25 female) underwent routine clinical neuroimaging (T1) and a bedside evaluation of language performance (Bedside Evaluation Screening Test-2) at onset of left hemisphere stroke. Brain age was estimated from enantiomorphically reconstructed brain scans using a machine learning algorithm trained on a large sample of healthy adults. A subsample of 30 participants returned for follow-up language assessments at least 2 years after stroke onset. To account for variability in age at stroke, we calculated proportional brain age difference, i.e. the proportional difference between brain age and chronological age. Multiple regression models were constructed to test the effects of proportional brain age difference on language outcomes. Lesion volume and chronological age were included as covariates in all models. Accelerated brain age compared with age was associated with worse overall aphasia severity (F(1, 48) = 5.65, P = 0.022), naming (F(1, 48) = 5.13, P = 0.028), and speech repetition (F(1, 48) = 8.49, P = 0.006) at stroke onset. Follow-up assessments were carried out ≥2 years after onset; decelerated brain age relative to age was significantly associated with reduced overall aphasia severity (F(1, 26) = 5.45, P = 0.028) and marginally failed to reach statistical significance for auditory comprehension (F(1, 26) = 2.87, P = 0.103). Proportional brain age difference was not found to be associated with changes in naming (F(1, 26) = 0.23, P = 0.880) and speech repetition (F(1, 26) = 0.00, P = 0.978). Chronological age was only associated with naming performance at stroke onset (F(1, 48) = 4.18, P = 0.047). These results indicate that brain age as estimated based on routine clinical brain scans may be a strong biomarker for language function and recovery after stroke.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sigfus Kristinsson
- Correspondence to: Sigfus Kristinsson, PhD Center for the Study of Aphasia Recovery University of South Carolina, 915 Greene Street Columbia, SC 29209, USA E-mail:
| | - Natalie Busby
- Center for the Study of Aphasia Recovery, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC 29208, USA
| | - Christopher Rorden
- Center for the Study of Aphasia Recovery, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC 29208, USA,Department of Psychology, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC 29208, USA
| | - Roger Newman-Norlund
- Center for the Study of Aphasia Recovery, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC 29208, USA,Department of Psychology, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC 29208, USA
| | - Dirk B den Ouden
- Center for the Study of Aphasia Recovery, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC 29208, USA,Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Columbia, SC 29208, USA
| | | | - Haukur Hjaltason
- Department of Medicine, University of Iceland, Reykjavik 00107, Iceland,Department of Neurology, Landspitali University Hospital, Reykjavik 00101, Iceland
| | - Helga Thors
- Department of Medicine, University of Iceland, Reykjavik 00107, Iceland
| | - Argye E Hillis
- Center for the Study of Aphasia Recovery, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC 29208, USA,Department of Neurology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MA 21218, USA
| | - Olafur Kjartansson
- Department of Neurology, Landspitali University Hospital, Reykjavik 00101, Iceland
| | - Leonardo Bonilha
- Center for the Study of Aphasia Recovery, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC 29208, USA,Department of Neurology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC 29425, USA
| | - Julius Fridriksson
- Center for the Study of Aphasia Recovery, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC 29208, USA,Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Columbia, SC 29208, USA
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Popescu T, Stahl B, Wiernik BM, Haiduk F, Zemanek M, Helm H, Matzinger T, Beisteiner R, Fitch WT. Melodic Intonation Therapy for aphasia: A multi-level meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and individual participant data. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2022; 1516:76-84. [PMID: 35918503 PMCID: PMC9804200 DOI: 10.1111/nyas.14848] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
Melodic Intonation Therapy (MIT) is a prominent rehabilitation program for individuals with post-stroke aphasia. Our meta-analysis investigated the efficacy of MIT while considering quality of outcomes, experimental design, influence of spontaneous recovery, MIT protocol variant, and level of generalization. Extensive literature search identified 606 studies in major databases and trial registers; of those, 22 studies-overall 129 participants-met all eligibility criteria. Multi-level mixed- and random-effects models served to separately meta-analyze randomized controlled trial (RCT) and non-RCT data. RCT evidence on validated outcomes revealed a small-to-moderate standardized effect in noncommunicative language expression for MIT-with substantial uncertainty. Unvalidated outcomes attenuated MIT's effect size compared to validated tests. MIT's effect size was 5.7 times larger for non-RCT data compared to RCT data (g̅case report = 2.01 vs. g̅RCT = 0.35 for validated Non-Communicative Language Expression measures). Effect size for non-RCT data decreased with number of months post-stroke, suggesting confound through spontaneous recovery. Deviation from the original MIT protocol did not systematically alter benefit from treatment. Progress on validated tests arose mainly from gains in repetition tasks rather than other domains of verbal expression, such as everyday communication ability. Our results confirm the promising role of MIT in improving trained and untrained performance on unvalidated outcomes, alongside validated repetition tasks, and highlight possible limitations in promoting everyday communication ability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tudor Popescu
- Department of Behavioural and Cognitive BiologyUniversity of ViennaViennaAustria
- Department of NeurologyMedical University of ViennaViennaAustria
- Centre for Mind and Brain SciencesUniversity of TrentoRoveretoItaly
| | - Benjamin Stahl
- Faculty of ScienceMedical School BerlinBerlinGermany
- Department of NeurologyCharité UniversitätsmedizinBerlinGermany
- Department of NeurophysicsMax Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain SciencesLeipzigGermany
- Department of NeurologyUniversitätsmedizin GreifswaldGreifswaldGermany
| | | | - Felix Haiduk
- Department of Behavioural and Cognitive BiologyUniversity of ViennaViennaAustria
| | | | - Hannah Helm
- Faculty of ScienceMedical School BerlinBerlinGermany
| | - Theresa Matzinger
- Department of Behavioural and Cognitive BiologyUniversity of ViennaViennaAustria
- Department of EnglishUniversity of ViennaViennaAustria
- Centre of Language Evolution StudiesNicolaus Copernicus University ToruńToruńPoland
| | | | - W. Tecumseh Fitch
- Department of Behavioural and Cognitive BiologyUniversity of ViennaViennaAustria
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Determining levels of linguistic deficit by applying cluster analysis to the aphasia quotient of Western Aphasia Battery in post-stroke aphasia. Sci Rep 2022; 12:15108. [PMID: 36068279 PMCID: PMC9448769 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-17997-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2022] [Accepted: 08/03/2022] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
The aphasia quotient of Western Aphasia Battery (WAB-AQ) has been used as an inclusion criterion and as an outcome measure in clinical, research, or community settings. The WAB-AQ is also commonly used to measure recovery. This study aimed to quantitatively determine levels of the linguistic deficit by using a cluster analysis of the WAB-AQ in post-stroke aphasia (PSA). 308 patients were extracted from the database. Cutoff scores are defined by mean overlap WAB-AQ scores of clusters by systematic cluster analysis, the method of which is the farthest neighbor element, and the metrics are square Euclidean distance and Pearson correlation, performed on the full sample of WAB-AQ individual subitem scores. A 1-way analysis of variance, with post hoc comparisons conducted, was used to determine whether clusters had significant differences. Three clusters were identified. The scores for severe, moderate, and mild linguistic deficit levels ranged from 0 to 30, 30.1 to 50.3, and 50.4 to 93.7, respectively. For PSA, the cluster analysis of WAB-AQ supports a 3-impairment level classification scheme.
Collapse
|
41
|
Garrido del Águila D, Niño AL, Carballo G. Medidas de Calidad de Vida en Personas con Afasia. Revisión Sistemática. REVISTA DE INVESTIGACIÓN EN LOGOPEDIA 2022. [DOI: 10.5209/rlog.79102] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
La afasia después de un daño cerebral y sus diferentes condiciones negativas derivadas, afectan a la calidad de vida (CdV) de la persona. El objetivo de este estudio es describir y analizar la literatura de los años comprendidos entre 2016 y 2020 para identificar y cuantificar aspectos relevantes de la CdV y su evaluación en personas con afasia (PWA). Para lo anterior, se consultaron tres bases de datos (PsycINFO, Medline y Psicodoc). Se incluyeron 38 estudios. Se codificaron y analizaron las características de los estudios y se evaluó la calidad de los trabajos siguiendo las pautas marcadas por la STROBE y la NIH. Los resultados muestran que la prueba de evaluación de CdV más utilizada fue la Stroke and Aphasia Quality of Life Scale-39 (SAQOL-39) (n= 19, 50.00%). En la mayoría de los estudios, independientemente de las pruebas de evaluación, las PWA presentan una baja CdV. Los estudios seleccionados presentan una calidad metodológica media-alta. Como conclusión cabe destacar que, además de limitar aspectos de la comunicación y el lenguaje, la afasia afecta negativamente a la CdV de forma global de la persona que la padece. El desarrollo de pruebas de evaluación de la CdV puede ayudar a los profesionales a planificar una intervención adecuada.
Collapse
|
42
|
Charalambous M, Phylactou P, Elriz T, Psychogios L, Annoni J, Kambanaros M. Adaptation of The Scenario Test for Greek-speaking people with aphasia: A reliability and validity study. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LANGUAGE & COMMUNICATION DISORDERS 2022; 57:865-880. [PMID: 35555844 PMCID: PMC9544128 DOI: 10.1111/1460-6984.12727] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2022] [Accepted: 03/25/2022] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Evidence-based assessments for people with aphasia (PWA) in Greek are predominantly impairment based. Functional communication (FC) is usually underreported and neglected by clinicians. This study explores the adaptation and psychometric testing of the Greek (GR) version of The Scenario Test. The test assesses the everyday FC of PWA in an interactive multimodal communication setting. AIMS To determine the reliability and validity of The Scenario Test-GR and discuss its clinical value. METHODS & PROCEDURES The Scenario Test-GR was administered to 54 people with chronic stroke (6+ months post-stroke): 32 PWA and 22 stroke survivors without aphasia. Participants were recruited from Greece and Cyprus. All measures were administered in an interview format. Standard psychometric criteria were applied to evaluate reliability (internal consistency, test-retest, and interrater reliability) and validity (construct and known-groups validity) of The Scenario Test-GR. OUTCOMES & RESULTS The Scenario Test-GR shows high levels of reliability and validity. High scores of internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.95), test-retest reliability (intra-class coefficients (ICC) = 0.99), and interrater reliability (ICC = 0.99) were found. Interrater agreement in scores on individual items ranged from good to excellent levels of agreement. Correlations with a tool measuring language function in aphasia, a measure of FC, two instruments examining the psychosocial impact of aphasia and a tool measuring non-verbal cognitive skills revealed good convergent validity (all ps < 0.05). Results showed good known-groups validity (Mann-Whitney U = 96.5, p < 0.001), with significantly higher scores for participants without aphasia compared with those with aphasia. CONCLUSIONS & IMPLICATIONS The psychometric qualities of The Scenario Test-GR support the reliability and validity of the tool for the assessment of FC in Greek-speaking PWA. The test can be used to assess multimodal FC, promote aphasia rehabilitation goal-setting at the activity and participation levels, and be used as an outcome measure of everyday communication abilities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marina Charalambous
- The Brain and Neurorehabilitation LabDepartment of Rehabilitation SciencesCyprus University of TechnologyLimassolCyprus
- Laboratory of Cognitive and Neurological SciencesFaculty of Science and MedicineNeurology UnitUniversity of FribourgFribourgSwitzerland
| | - Phivos Phylactou
- Department of Rehabilitation SciencesCyprus University of TechnologyLimassolCyprus
| | - Thekla Elriz
- Department of Rehabilitation SciencesCyprus University of TechnologyLimassolCyprus
| | - Loukia Psychogios
- Euroclinic GroupTheseus Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation CenterAthensGreece
| | - Jean‐Marie Annoni
- Laboratory of Cognitive and Neurological SciencesFaculty of Science and MedicineNeurology UnitUniversity of FribourgFribourgSwitzerland
| | - Maria Kambanaros
- The Brain and Neurorehabilitation LabDepartment of Rehabilitation SciencesCyprus University of TechnologyLimassolCyprus
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Diedrichs VA, Jewell C, Harnish SM. A SCOPING REVIEW OF THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN NONLINGUISTIC COGNITIVE FACTORS AND APHASIA TREATMENT RESPONSE. TOPICS IN LANGUAGE DISORDERS 2022; 42:212-235. [PMID: 36338795 PMCID: PMC9629776 DOI: 10.1097/tld.0000000000000290] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/21/2023]
Abstract
Purpose:
The purpose of this article was to explore the extent to which nonlinguistic cognitive factors demonstrate a relationship with aphasia treatment outcomes. To that end, we conducted a scoping review to broadly characterize the state of the literature related to this topic.
Methods:
Reporting guidelines from the PRISMA extension for scoping reviews were used to conduct our study, which queried two common databases used in the health science literature, PubMed and Web of Science. Search terms and eligibility criteria are provided. Results are organized by the four nonlinguistic domains of cognition explored across the included studies (i.e., attention, memory, executive functioning, and visuospatial skills).
Results:
Of 949 unique articles identified from our database searches, 17 articles with 18 distinct studies were included in the final scoping review. Notably, most studies included in the scoping review targeted impairment-based aphasia treatments. Most studies also examined multiple domains of nonlinguistic cognition. A relationship between cognition and poststroke aphasia therapy outcomes was identified in nine of 15 studies addressing executive functioning, four of nine studies examining memory, four of eight studies examining visuospatial skills, and two of five studies exploring attention.
Discussion:
The results among included studies were mixed, with few discernible patterns within each of the four cognitive domains, though it appears that the influence of nonlinguistic cognition may depend on the timing (i.e., immediate vs. delayed post-treatment) and type (i.e., trained vs. untrained, generalized) of aphasia therapy outcomes. Future study designs should address maintenance, by including outcome measures at follow-up, and generalization, by including measures of performance on either untrained stimuli or trained stimuli in untrained contexts. Future work should also strive for larger sample sizes, perhaps through collaborations, or prioritize replicability to produce more reliable conclusions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Courtney Jewell
- Department of Speech and Hearing Science, The Ohio State University
| | - Stacy M Harnish
- Department of Speech and Hearing Science, The Ohio State University
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Rose ML, Nickels L, Copland D, Togher L, Godecke E, Meinzer M, Rai T, Cadilhac DA, Kim J, Hurley M, Foster A, Carragher M, Wilcox C, Pierce JE, Steel G. Results of the COMPARE trial of Constraint-induced or Multimodality Aphasia Therapy compared with usual care in chronic post-stroke aphasia. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2022; 93:573-581. [PMID: 35396340 PMCID: PMC9148985 DOI: 10.1136/jnnp-2021-328422] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2021] [Accepted: 03/09/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND While meta-analyses confirm treatment for chronic post-stroke aphasia is effective, a lack of comparative evidence for different interventions limits prescription accuracy. We investigated whether Constraint-Induced Aphasia Therapy Plus (CIAT-plus) and/or Multimodality Aphasia Therapy (M-MAT) provided greater therapeutic benefit compared with usual community care and were differentially effective according to baseline aphasia severity. METHODS We conducted a three-arm, multicentre, parallel group, open-label, blinded endpoint, phase III, randomised-controlled trial. We stratified eligible participants by baseline aphasia on the Western Aphasia Battery-Revised Aphasia Quotient (WAB-R-AQ). Groups of three participants were randomly assigned (1:1:1) to 30 hours of CIAT-Plus or M-MAT or to usual care (UC). Primary outcome was change in aphasia severity (WAB-R-AQ) from baseline to therapy completion analysed in the intention-to-treat population. Secondary outcomes included word retrieval, connected speech, functional communication, multimodal communication, quality of life and costs. RESULTS We analysed 201 participants (70 in CIAT-Plus, 70 in M-MAT and 61 in UC). Aphasia severity was not significantly different between groups at postintervention: 1.05 points (95% CI -0.78 to 2.88; p=0.36) UC group vs CIAT-Plus; 1.06 points (95% CI -0.78 to 2.89; p=0.36) UC group vs M-MAT; 0.004 points (95% CI -1.76 to 1.77; p=1.00) CIAT-Plus vs M-MAT. Word retrieval, functional communication and communication-related quality of life were significantly improved following CIAT-Plus and M-MAT. Word retrieval benefits were maintained at 12-week follow-up. CONCLUSIONS CIAT-Plus and M-MAT were effective for word retrieval, functional communication, and quality of life, while UC was not. Future studies should explore predictive characteristics of responders and impacts of maintenance doses. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER ACTRN 2615000618550.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Miranda L Rose
- Allied Health, Human Services and Sport, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia .,Centre of Research Excellence in Aphasia Recovery and Rehabilitation, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Lyndsey Nickels
- School of Psychological Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - David Copland
- Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.,Queensland Aphasia Rehabilitation Centre, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Leanne Togher
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Erin Godecke
- Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Marcus Meinzer
- Department of Neurology, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany
| | - Tapan Rai
- University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Dominique A Cadilhac
- Stroke and Ageing Research, Monash University Faculty of Medicine Nursing and Health Sciences, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
| | - Joosup Kim
- Stroke and Ageing Research, Monash University Faculty of Medicine Nursing and Health Sciences, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
| | - Melanie Hurley
- Centre of Research Excellence in Aphasia Recovery and Rehabilitation, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Abby Foster
- Centre of Research Excellence in Aphasia Recovery and Rehabilitation, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Monash Health, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
| | - Marcella Carragher
- Centre of Research Excellence in Aphasia Recovery and Rehabilitation, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Cassie Wilcox
- Centre of Research Excellence in Aphasia Recovery and Rehabilitation, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - John E Pierce
- Centre of Research Excellence in Aphasia Recovery and Rehabilitation, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Gillian Steel
- Centre of Research Excellence in Aphasia Recovery and Rehabilitation, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Tierney-Hendricks C, Schliep ME, Vallila-Rohter S. Using an Implementation Framework to Survey Outcome Measurement and Treatment Practices in Aphasia. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY 2022; 31:1133-1162. [PMID: 34890256 DOI: 10.1044/2021_ajslp-21-00101] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Best practices in the field of aphasia rehabilitation increasingly acknowledge a whole-person approach that values interventions aimed at reducing impairments, while also recognizing the impact of aphasia on participation and quality of life. Guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR), this study aimed to examine whether current clinical practices along levels of service provision reflect this whole-person, multifaceted approach. METHOD Speech-language pathologists (SLPs) in the United States who provide intervention to people with aphasia across the continuum of care completed this cross-sectional online survey. Current outcome measurement and treatment practices were evaluated within the Living With Aphasia: Framework for Outcome Measurement via multiple-choice and open-text response questions. Data were analyzed descriptively and using ordinal logistic regression models to compare clinical practices along levels of service provision. RESULTS Data from 90 SLPs revealed that language and cognitive skills are assessed with equal consistency across clinical settings; however, functional communication, participation, and quality of life domains are prioritized in settings providing care to clients within the community. Psychological well-being is rarely assessed within clinical practice along most of the rehabilitation process and prioritized within the university clinic setting when clients are in the chronic stage of recovery. CONCLUSIONS Clinical practices related to a multifaceted approach to aphasia intervention are variable across levels of service provision. Further exploration of barriers and facilitators to multifaceted aphasia care along the domains of the CFIR is needed to provide an informed approach to implementing change.
Collapse
|
46
|
Revealing the Neuroimaging Mechanism of Acupuncture for Poststroke Aphasia: A Systematic Review. Neural Plast 2022; 2022:5635596. [PMID: 35494482 PMCID: PMC9050322 DOI: 10.1155/2022/5635596] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2021] [Revised: 02/21/2022] [Accepted: 03/29/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Aphasia is a common symptom in stroke patients, presenting with the impairment of spontaneous speech, repetition, naming, auditory comprehension, reading, and writing function. Multiple rehabilitation methods have been suggested for the recovery of poststroke aphasia, including medication treatment, behavioral therapy, and stimulation approach. Acupuncture has been proven to have a beneficial effect on improving speech functions in repetition, oral speech, reading, comprehension, and writing ability. Neuroimaging technology provides a visualized way to explore cerebral neural activity, which helps reveal the therapeutic effect of acupuncture therapy. In this systematic review, we aim to reveal and summarize the neuroimaging mechanism of acupuncture therapy on poststroke aphasia to provide the foundation for further study. Methods Seven electronic databases were searched including PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, the Wanfang databases, and the Chinese Scientific Journal Database. After screening the studies according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, we summarized the neuroimaging mechanism of acupuncture on poststroke aphasia, as well as the utilization of acupuncture therapy and the methodological characteristics. Result After searching, 885 articles were retrieved. After removing the literature studies, animal studies, and case reports, 16 studies were included in the final analysis. For the acupuncture type, 10 studies used manual acupuncture and 5 studies used electroacupuncture, while body acupuncture (10 studies), scalp acupuncture (7 studies), and tongue acupuncture (8 studies) were applied for poststroke aphasia patients. Based on blood oxygen level-dependent (BOLD) and diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) technologies, 4 neuroimaging analysis methods were used including amplitude of low-frequency fluctuation (ALFF), regional homogeneity (ReHo), seed-based analysis, and independent component analysis (ICA). Two studies reported the instant acupuncture effect, and 14 studies reported the constant acupuncture's effect on poststroke aphasia patients. 5 studies analyzed the correlation between the neuroimaging outcomes and the clinical language scales. Conclusion In this systematic review, we found that the mechanism of acupuncture's effect might be associated with the activation and functional connectivity of language-related brain areas, such as brain areas around Broca's area and Wernicke's area in the left inferior temporal gyrus, supramarginal gyrus, middle frontal gyrus, and inferior frontal gyrus. However, these studies were still in the preliminary stage. Multicenter randomized controlled trials (RCT) with large sample sizes were needed to verify current evidence, as well as to explore deeply the neuroimaging mechanisms of acupuncture's effects.
Collapse
|
47
|
VukoviĆ M, Sukur Ž, VukoviĆ I, Salis C, Code C. Reliability and validity of the Stroke and Aphasia Quality of Life Scale-39 (SAQOL-39) for a Serbian population. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY 2022; 24:168-172. [PMID: 34543112 DOI: 10.1080/17549507.2021.1971298] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
Purpose: Aphasia has a negative impact on a person's quality of life (QOL). The Stroke Aphasia Quality of Life-39 scale (SAQOL-39) is a widely-used measure of health-related quality of life (HRQOL) developed for people with aphasia that has been translated into several languages. Its psychometric properties have been examined not only in English, but also in other languages. This study examined the reliability and validity of a translation and adaptation of the SAQOL-39 into Serbian in Serbian-speaking people with aphasia.Method: Using forward and backward translation, the SAQOL-39 was translated and adapted from English into Serbian and its psychometric properties were examined in 90 Serbian-speaking people with a broad range of times post-onset of aphasia. Internal consistency, test-retest reliability and other analyses were conducted.Result: Internal consistency and test-retest reliability of the Serbian version was high (Cronbach's α > 0.9; ICC ≥0.87), which is similar to versions of the scale in other languages.Conclusion: The Serbian translation and adaptation of the SAQOL-39 was shown to be a valid and reliable measure of QOL in people with aphasia with reliable psychometric properties and is suitable for the assessment of Serbian people with aphasia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mile VukoviĆ
- Faculty of Special Education and Rehabilitation, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia
| | - Željana Sukur
- Institute for Psychophysiological Disorders and Speech Pathology "Dr Cvetko Brajović", Belgrade, Serbia
| | - Irena VukoviĆ
- Veljko Ramadanović School for Visually Impaired Students, Belgrade, Serbia
| | | | - Chris Code
- Department of Psychology, Washingtonn Singer Labs, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Edelkraut L, López-Barroso D, Torres-Prioris MJ, Starkstein SE, Jorge RE, Aloisi J, Berthier ML, Dávila G. Spectrum of neuropsychiatric symptoms in chronic post-stroke aphasia. World J Psychiatry 2022; 12:450-469. [PMID: 35433325 PMCID: PMC8968505 DOI: 10.5498/wjp.v12.i3.450] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2021] [Revised: 08/13/2021] [Accepted: 02/10/2022] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Neuropsychiatric symptoms (NPS) have been insufficiently examined in persons with aphasia (PWA) because most previous studies exclude participants with language and communication disorders.
AIM To report a two-part study consisting of a literature review and an observational study on NPS in post-stroke aphasia.
METHODS Study 1 reviewed articles obtained from PubMed, PsycINFO, Google Scholar and Cochrane databases after cross-referencing key words of post-stroke aphasia to NPS and disorders. Study 2 examined language deficits and activities of daily living in 20 PWA (median age: 58, range: 28-65 years; 13 men) with the Western Aphasia Battery-Revised and the Barthel Index, respectively. Informants of these 20 PWA were proxy-evaluated with the Neuropsychiatric Inventory and domain-specific scales, including the Stroke Aphasia Depression Questionnaire-10 item version and the Starkstein Apathy Scale. In addition, an adapted version of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale was directly administered to the PWA themselves. This observational study is based on the baseline assessment of an intervention clinical trial (EudraCT: 2017-002858-36; ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04134416).
RESULTS The literature review revealed a broad spectrum of NPS in PWA, including depression, anxiety, apathy, agitation/aggression, eating and sleep disorders, psychosis, and hypomania/mania. These findings alert to the need for improving assessment and treatment approaches of NPS taking into consideration their frequent occurrence in PWA. Study 2 showed that the 20 participants had mild- to-moderate aphasia severity and were functionally independent. A wide range of comorbid NPS was found in the post-stroke aphasic population (median number of NPS: 5, range: 1-8). The majority of PWA (75%) had depressive symptoms, followed by agitation/aggression (70%), irritability (70%), anxiety (65%) and appetite/eating symptoms (65%). Half of them also presented symptoms of apathy, whereas euphoria and psychotic symptoms were rare (5%). Domain-specific scales revealed that 45% of participants had apathy and 30% were diagnosed with depression and anxiety.
CONCLUSION Concurrent NPS are frequent in the chronic period of post-stroke aphasia. Therefore, further research on reliable and valid assessment tools and treatment for this aphasic population is strongly warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lisa Edelkraut
- Department of Psychobiology and Methodology of Behavioral Science, Faculty of Psychology and Speech Therapy, University of Malaga, Malaga 29071, Spain
- Cognitive Neurology and Aphasia Unit, Centro de Investigaciones Médico-Sanitarias, University of Malaga, Malaga 29010, Spain
- Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Málaga, University of Malaga, Malaga 29010, Spain
| | - Diana López-Barroso
- Department of Psychobiology and Methodology of Behavioral Science, Faculty of Psychology and Speech Therapy, University of Malaga, Malaga 29071, Spain
- Cognitive Neurology and Aphasia Unit, Centro de Investigaciones Médico-Sanitarias, University of Malaga, Malaga 29010, Spain
- Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Málaga, University of Malaga, Malaga 29010, Spain
| | - María José Torres-Prioris
- Department of Psychobiology and Methodology of Behavioral Science, Faculty of Psychology and Speech Therapy, University of Malaga, Malaga 29071, Spain
- Cognitive Neurology and Aphasia Unit, Centro de Investigaciones Médico-Sanitarias, University of Malaga, Malaga 29010, Spain
- Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Málaga, University of Malaga, Malaga 29010, Spain
| | - Sergio E Starkstein
- School of Psychiatry and Neurosciences, The University of Western Australia, Perth 6009, Australia
| | - Ricardo E Jorge
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, United States
| | - Jessica Aloisi
- Cognitive Neurology and Aphasia Unit, Centro de Investigaciones Médico-Sanitarias, University of Malaga, Malaga 29010, Spain
| | - Marcelo L Berthier
- Cognitive Neurology and Aphasia Unit, Centro de Investigaciones Médico-Sanitarias, University of Malaga, Malaga 29010, Spain
- Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Málaga, University of Malaga, Malaga 29010, Spain
| | - Guadalupe Dávila
- Department of Psychobiology and Methodology of Behavioral Science, Faculty of Psychology and Speech Therapy, University of Malaga, Malaga 29071, Spain
- Cognitive Neurology and Aphasia Unit, Centro de Investigaciones Médico-Sanitarias, University of Malaga, Malaga 29010, Spain
- Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Málaga, University of Malaga, Malaga 29010, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Matar SJ, Newton C, Sorinola IO, Pavlou M. Transcranial Direct-Current Stimulation as an Adjunct to Verb Network Strengthening Treatment in Post-stroke Chronic Aphasia: A Double-Blinded Randomized Feasibility Study. Front Neurol 2022; 13:722402. [PMID: 35309584 PMCID: PMC8924047 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2022.722402] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2021] [Accepted: 01/24/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Difficulties in discourse production are common in post-stroke chronic aphasia. Previous studies have found that speech and language therapy combined with transcranial direct-current stimulation (tDCS) may improve language skills like naming and enhance aphasia treatment outcomes. However, very few studies have investigated the effect of tDCS when combined with interventions for improving higher level language skills such as the Verb Network Strengthening Treatment (VNeST). Aims This study aimed to determine the feasibility of anodal tDCS as an adjunct to VNeST to improve discourse production in post-stroke chronic aphasia. Methods Six people with post-stroke chronic aphasia took part in this double-blinded randomized feasibility study. Participants were randomly allocated to either the experimental group receiving a 6-week block of once weekly VNeST sessions combined with active tDCS over the left inferior frontal gyrus (LIFG) or a control group that received VNeST with sham stimulation. Feasibility outcomes included screening, eligibility, retention, and completion rates, and adverse events. Preliminary response to intervention was also examined using discourse production, functional communication, quality of life, psychological state, and cognition outcomes. Results Overall 19 individuals were screened and ten met the inclusion criteria. Six individuals provided consent and participated in the study giving a consent rate of 60%. Participant retention and completion rates were 100% and no adverse effects were reported. Exploratory analyses revealed promising changes (i.e., estimated large effect size) in discourse production measures across discourse language tasks and functional communication for the active tDCS group. Conclusions Our results support the feasibility of tDCS as an adjunct to VNeST. Preliminary findings provide motivation for future large-scale studies to better understand the potential of tDCS as a safe and economical tool for enhancing rehabilitation in chronic aphasia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shereen J. Matar
- Centre for Human & Applied Physiological Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences & Medicine, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Caroline Newton
- Division of Psychology and Language Sciences, Faculty of Brain Sciences, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Isaac O. Sorinola
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences & Medicine, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Marousa Pavlou
- Centre for Human & Applied Physiological Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences & Medicine, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
- *Correspondence: Marousa Pavlou
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Dunn K, Rumbach A, Finch E. Language function in the acute phase following non-traumatic subarachnoid haemorrhage: A prospective cohort study. JOURNAL OF COMMUNICATION DISORDERS 2022; 96:106192. [PMID: 35149316 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2022.106192] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2021] [Revised: 01/19/2022] [Accepted: 01/31/2022] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Aphasia is common following stroke, with associated negative impacts on quality of life and psychosocial functioning. However, the language function of individuals who develop non-traumatic subarachnoid haemorrhage (SAH) has been minimally investigated from a speech-language pathology (SLP) perspective. AIMS To examine and characterise the language function of individuals following non-traumatic SAH in the acute phase and describe the clinical profile and outcomes of individuals in this cohort with language impairment. METHODS & PROCEDURES Prospective cohort study of adults admitted to a tertiary hospital with primary non-traumatic SAH over a 12-month period (June 2018 to June 2019). Language assessment using the Brisbane Evidence-Based Language Test (EBLT) was performed within 72 h of medical stability. Assessment scores were analysed for 43 participants. OUTCOMES & RESULTS Language impairment was present in 18.6% (n = 8/43) of the cohort, and was associated with increased intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay (LOS) (p < 0.01) and increased hospital length of stay (p = 0.01). The profile of participants with impaired language was highly variable with difficulties across auditory comprehension, verbal expression, reading comprehension, and written expression. Associated cognitive and attention difficulties also impacted test performance in this cohort. Six of the eight participants with impaired language required ongoing SLP support beyond hospital discharge. CONCLUSIONS & IMPLICATIONS Early, routine assessment of language function of individuals following non-traumatic SAH is essential and should be incorporated into clinical care pathways.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katrina Dunn
- Speech Pathology Department, West Moreton Health, Queensland Health, Ipswich, Queensland, Australia; School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
| | - Anna Rumbach
- School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Emma Finch
- School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia; Centre for Functioning and Health Research (CFAHR), Metro South Hospital and Health Service, Brisbane, Australia; Speech Pathology Department, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Metro South Hospital and Health Service, Queensland Health, Queensland, Australia
| |
Collapse
|