Thrombectomy in basilar artery occlusion

Incidence and predictors of futile recanalisation after endovascular therapy in acute vertebrobasilar artery occlusion patients: insight from the ANGEL-ACT registry

OBJECTIVES

To identify the occurrence rate and predictors of futile recanalisation after endovascular therapy (EVT) for acute vertebrobasilar artery occlusion (VBAO).

METHODS

Participants of the Endovascular Treatment Key Technique and Emergency Workflow Improvement of Acute Ischaemic Stroke (ANGEL-ACT) registry were selected for the analysis. Futile recanalisation was defined as patients did not achieve a 90-day good outcome (modified Rankin Scale ≤3) despite successful recanalisation (modified Treatment in Cerebral Ischaemia Scale ≥2b) after the procedure. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was conducted to find independent predictors of futile recanalisation in VBAO patients undergoing EVT.

RESULTS

Three hundred and fifteen patients with VBAO who achieved successful recanalisation after EVT were included in current analysis, of whom, 155 (49.2%) suffered futile recanalisation, and 160 achieved effective recanalisation. After the multivariable analysis, we found admission National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) ≥19 (OR 4.81, 95% CI 2.76 to 8.39, p<0.001), platelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) ≥162.2 (OR 1.93, 95% CI 1.14 to 3.27, p=0.001), onset-to-puncture time (OTP) ≥334 min (OR 2.15, 95% CI 1.25 to 3.68, p=0.005) and use of general anesthesia (GA) (OR 1.87, 95% CI 1.09 to 3.22, p=0.024) were associated with futile recanalisation.

CONCLUSIONS

Futile recanalisation after EVT occurred 49.2% of VBAO patients in the ANGEL-ACT registry. NIHSS≥19, PLR≥162.2, OTP≥334 min and use of GA were independent predictors of futile recanalisation.

Endovascular stroke therapy outside core working hours in a nationwide stroke system

BACKGROUND

Endovascular therapy (EVT) has been established as a major component in the acute treatment of large vessel occlusion stroke. However, it is unclear whether outcome and other treatment-related factors differ if patients are treated within or outside core working hours.

METHODS

We analyzed data from the prospective nationwide Austrian Stroke Unit Registry capturing all consecutive stroke patients treated with EVT between 2016 and 2020. Patients were trichotomized according to the time of groin puncture into treatment within regular working hours (08:00-13:59), afternoon/evening (14:00-21:59) and night-time (22:00-07:59). Additionally, we analyzed 12 EVT treatment windows with equal patient numbers. Main outcome variables included favorable outcome (modified Rankin Scale scores of 0-2) 3 months post-stroke as well as procedural time metrics, recanalization status and complications.

RESULTS

We analyzed 2916 patients (median age 74 years, 50.7% female) who underwent EVT. Patients treated within core working hours more frequently had a favorable outcome (42.6% vs 36.1% treated in the afternoon/evening vs 35.8% treated at night-time; p=0.007). Similar results were found when analyzing 12 treatment windows. All these differences remained significant in multivariable analysis adjusting for outcome-relevant co-factors. Onset-to-recanalization time was considerably longer outside core working hours, which was mainly explained by longer door-to-groin time (p<0.001). There was no difference in the number of passes, recanalization status, groin-to-recanalization time and EVT-related complications.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings of delayed intrahospital EVT workflows and worse functional outcomes outside core working hours in this nationwide registry are relevant for optimization of stroke care, and might be applicable to other countries with similar settings.

Clinical outcome and outcome prediction of octogenarians with acute basilar artery occlusion and endovascular stroke treatment compared to younger patients

Background and aims

Octogenarians are underrepresented in recently published studies that showed the benefit of endovascular stroke treatment (EST) for patients with acute basilar artery occlusion (BAO). We aimed to compare the clinical outcome of octogenarians with BAO and EST compared to younger patients (YPs) and identify independent outcome predictors.

Methods

This is a retrospective, single-center analysis of patients treated for BAO with EST from January 2013 until June 2021 in a tertiary stroke center. Octogenarians (80-89 years) were compared to YPs. A study endpoint was a favorable clinical outcome as per the modified Rankin Scale (mRS 0-3), 90 days after stroke onset. The study groups were compared using univariate analysis, and a multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to define independent predictors for favorable and unfavorable (mRS 5-6) clinical outcomes.

Results

In this study cohort, 74/191 (38.7%) octogenarians had a higher pre-stroke mRS [median, interquartile range (IQR): 2, 1-3 octogenarians vs. 0, 0-1 YP, p < 0.001] and a comparable National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) before EST (median, IQR: 21, 10-38 vs. 20, 8-35 in YP, p = 0.487). They showed a comparable rate of favorable outcome (mRS 0-3, 90 days, 23.0 vs. 25.6% in YP, p = 0.725), but were less often functionally independent (mRS 0-2: 10.8% in octogenarians vs. 23.0% in YP, p = 0.049). The rate of unfavorable clinical outcome was comparable (mRS 5-6, n = 40, 54.1% in octogenarians vs. n = 64, 54.7% in YP, p = 0.831). A baseline NIHSS was an independent predictor for clinical outcome in YPs [e.g., for unfavorable clinical outcome: odds ratio (OR) 1.061, confidence interval (CI) 1.027-1.098, p = 0.005] and for favorable clinical outcome in octogenarians. Pre-stroke mRS predicted favorable outcomes in octogenarians (OR 0.54, CI 0.30-0.90, p = 0.0291), while age predicted unfavorable outcomes in YPs (OR 1.045, CI 1.011-1.086, p = 0.0137).

Conclusion

Octogenarians with acute BAO eligible for EST are as likely to achieve a favorable outcome as YPs, and the rate of death or severe disability is comparable. The admission NIHSS is an independent predictor for favorable and unfavorable outcomes in YP and for favorable outcomes in octogenarians. In this study cohort, pre-stroke mRS predicted favorable outcomes in octogenarians while age predicted an unfavorable outcome in YPs.

Endovascular Treatment Combined With Standard Medical Treatment Improves Outcomes of Posterior Circulation Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Aims

Whether endovascular treatment (EVT) can further improve the prognosis of patients with posterior circulation ischemic stroke (PCIS) is unclear. This meta-analysis aims to compare the efficacy and safety of PCIS patients treated with EVT plus standard medical treatment (SMT) and SMT alone.

Methods

We systematically searched for relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and prospective cohort trials in MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library up to February 2022. The primary outcome was favorable functional outcome of the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) with scores of 0-2 or 0-3; secondary outcomes included successful recanalization rate, intracranial hemorrhage (ICH), or symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) after treatment and 90-day mortality.

Results

We identified six studies including 1, 385 PCIS patients (957 with EVT plus SMT; 428 with SMT alone). EVT plus SMT substantially improved 90-day functional outcomes compared with SMT alone [mRS score of 0-2: RR=1.95, 95% CI (1.52 - 2.51), P < 0.001; mRS score of 0-3: RR = 1.85, 95% CI (1.49 - 2.30), P < 0.001, respectively]. Moreover, compared with SMT, combined treatment significantly improved the rate of successful recanalization [RR = 5.03, 95% CI (3.96-6.40), P < 0.001] and reduced 90-day mortality [RR = 0.71, 95% CI (0.63-0.79), P < 0.001] despite a higher risk of ICH [RR = 6.13, 95% CI (2.50-15.02), P < 0.001] and sICH [RR = 10.47, 95% CI [2.79-39.32), P = 0.001].

Conclusion

Low-to-moderate evidence from RCTs and non-RCTs showed that increased ICH and sICH risk of EVT plus SMT did not translate to a higher risk of unfavorable outcomes compared with SMT and could even promote independence at 90 days in a real-world cohort.

Endovascular Thrombectomy for Acute Basilar Artery Occlusion: Latest Findings and Critical Thinking on Future Study Design

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have demonstrated powerful efficacy of endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) for large vessel occlusion in the anterior circulation. The effect of EVT for acute basilar artery occlusion (BAO) in the posterior circulation remains unproven. Here, we highlight the latest findings of observational studies and RCTs of EVT for BAO, with a focus on the predictors of functional outcomes, the limitations of recent RCTs, and critical thinking on future study design. Pooled data from large retrospective studies showed 36.4% favorable outcome at 3 months and 4.6% symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH). Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that higher baseline NIHSS score, pc-ASPECTS < 8, extensive baseline infarction, large pontine infarct, and sICH were independent predictors of poor outcome. Two recent randomized trial BEST (Endovascular treatment vs. standard medical treatment for vertebrobasilar artery occlusion) and BASICS (Basilar Artery International Cooperation Study) failed to demonstrate significant benefit of EVT within 6 or 8 h after stroke symptom onset. The limitations of these studies include slow enrollment, selection bias, high crossover rate, and inclusion of patients with mild deficit. To improve enrollment and minimize risk of diluting the overall treatment effect, futile recanalization and re-occlusion, optimal inclusion/exclusion criteria, including enrollment within 24 h of last known well, NIHSS score ≥ 10, pc-ASPECTS ≥ 8, no large pontine infarct, and the use of rescue therapy for underlying atherosclerotic stenosis, should be considered for future clinical trials.