Incidence, predictors, and impact on outcome of underlying intracranial atherosclerotic disease in acute vertebrobasilar artery occlusion undergoing endovascular therapy: Data from ANGEL-ACT registry

Development and validation of a SCORing systEm for pre-thrombectomy diagnosis of IntraCranial Atherosclerotic Disease (Score-ICAD)

BACKGROUND

Early identification of intracranial atherosclerotic disease (ICAD) may impact the management of patients undergoing mechanical thrombectomy (MT). We sought to develop and validate a scoring system for pre-thrombectomy diagnosis of ICAD in anterior circulation large vessel/distal medium vessel occlusion strokes (LVOs/DMVOs).

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of two prospectively maintained comprehensive stroke center databases including patients with anterior circulation occlusions spanning 2010-22 (development cohort) and 2018-22 (validation cohort). ICAD cases were matched for age and sex (1:1) to non-ICAD controls.

RESULTS

Of 2870 MTs within the study period, 348 patients were included in the development cohort: 174 anterior circulation ICAD (6% of 2870 MTs) and 174 controls. Multivariable analysis β coefficients led to a 20 point scale: absence of atrial fibrillation (5); vascular risk factor burden (1) for each of hypertension, diabetes, smoking, and hyperlipidemia; multifocal single artery stenoses on CT angiography (3); absence of territorial cortical infarct (3); presence of borderzone infarct (3); or ipsilateral carotid siphon calcification (2). The validation cohort comprised 56 ICAD patients (4.1% of 1359 MTs): 56 controls. Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.88 (0.84-0.91) and 0.82 (0.73-0.89) in the development and validation cohorts, respectively. Calibration slope and intercept showed a good fit for the development cohort although with overestimated risk for the validation cohort. After intercept adjustment, the overestimation was corrected (intercept 0, 95% CI -0.5 to -0.5; slope 0.8, 95% CI 0.5 to 1.1). In the full cohort (n=414), ≥11 points showed the best performance for distinguishing ICAD from non-ICAD, with 0.71 (95% CI 0.65 to 0.78) sensitivity and 0.82 (95% CI 0.77 to 0.87) specificity, and 3.92 (95% CI 2.92 to 5.28) positive and 0.35 (95% CI 0.28 to 0.44) negative likelihood ratio. Scores ≥12 showed 90% specificity and 63% sensitivity.

CONCLUSION

The proposed scoring system for preprocedural diagnosis of ICAD LVOs and DMVOs presented satisfactory discrimination and calibration based on clinical and non-invasive radiological data.

Risk prediction of CISS classification in endovascular treatment of basilar artery stenosis

Objective

To investigate the incidence of ischemic stroke complications after endovascular treatment for basilar artery stenosis used preoperative high-resolution magnetic resonance vascular wall imaging (HRMR/VWI) and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI).

Methods

The clinical data of 47 patients with severe symptomatic basilar artery stenosis (stenosis rate ≥70 %) treated with endovascular therapy at the Neuro-interventional Center from December 2017 to December 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. High-resolution magnetic resonance angiography (HRMR VWI) and DWI were used to evaluate the location of atherosclerotic plaque at basilar artery stenosis and the distribution of cerebral infarction lesions in all patients before surgery.According to the CISS classification system for ischemic stroke, patients were divided into a perforation group and a hypoperfusion group, and the general situation, plaque distribution, and incidence of ischemic stroke complications 7 days after endovascular treatment in the two groups were analyzed.

Results

There was no significant difference in baseline data between the two groups. After 7 days of intravascular treatment, the incidence of ischemic stroke was higher in the perforation group (20.0 %) than in the hypoperfusion group (0.0 %), and the difference was statistically significant (P = 0.027). A significant association was found between the perforation group and the hypoperfusion group for the incidence of ischemic stroke at 7 days (P = 0.003, OR = 2.347; 95 % CI = 2.056-4.268). There were a higher proportion of ventral plaques (74.1 %) and a lower proportion of dorsal plaques (33.3 %) in the hypoperfusion group, which were 15.0 % and 90.0 % in the perforation group, respectively (χ2 = 16.045, P < 0.001; χ2 = 15.092, P < 0.001). There was no significant difference in the proportion of left and right plaques between the two groups.

Conclusions

The risk of ischemic stroke is greater in patients with perforator artery obstruction undergoing endovascular therapy, and lower in patients with hypoperfusion/embolus removal.

Network meta-analysis of first-line thrombectomy strategy for acute posterior circulation strokes: a preliminary evaluation for combined approach

Objective

Thrombectomy may provide superior results compared to best medical care for acute posterior circulation strokes (PCS). Contact aspiration (CA), stent retriever (SR), and combined SR + CA (SRA) are commonly employed as first-line techniques. However, the optimal strategy and the role of SRA remain uncertain.

Methods

Systematic searching was conducted in three databases (PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane). Network meta-analyzes were performed using random-effects models. The reperfusion and clinical outcomes were compared. Pooled outcomes were presented as odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Rankograms with surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) were calculated.

Results

Seventeen studies were included, involving a total of 645 patients who received first-line CA, 850 patients who received SR, and 166 patients who received SRA. Regarding final recanalization outcomes, both first-line SRA (OR = 3.2, 95%CI 1.4-11.0) and CA (OR = 2.1, 95%CI 1.3-3.7) demonstrated superiority over SR in achieving successful reperfusion [modified Thrombolysis In Cerebral Infarction (mTICI) 2b-3], with values of SUCRA 91.1, 58.5, and 0.4%, respectively. In addition, first-line SRA showed an advantage in achieving final mTICI 2c/3 compared to CA (OR = 3.6, 95%CI 0.99-16.0) and SR (OR = 6.4, 95%CI 1.3-35.0), with SUCRA value of 98.0, 44.7, and 7.2%, respectively. Regarding reperfusion outcome after the first pass, SRA also achieved a higher rate of mTICI 3 than SR (OR = 4.1, 95%CI 1.3-14.0), while CA did not (SUCRA 97.4, 4.6, 48.0%). In terms of safety outcomes, first-line CA was associated with a lower incidence of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) compared to SR (OR = 0.38, 95%CI 0.1-1.0), whereas the SRA technique did not (SUCRA 15.6, 78.6, 55.9%). Regarding clinical prognosis, first-line CA achieved a higher proportion of functional independence (modified Rankin Scale (mRS) 0-2) at 90 days than SR (OR = 1.4, 95%CI 1.1-1.9), whereas SRA did not (SUCRA 90.5, 17.4, 42.1%).

Conclusion

For acute PCS, a first-line CA strategy yielded better results in terms of final successful reperfusion and 90-day functional independence compared to SR. As the combined technique, first-line SRA was associated with superior first-pass and final reperfusion outcomes compared to SR. However, no significant difference was observed in functional independence achieved by first-line SRA compared to the other two strategies. Further high-quality studies are warranted.