Minimally invasive thread trigger digit release: a preliminary report on 34 digits of the adult hands

Ultrasound-guided vs. non-guided trigger finger release: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

Trigger finger (TF) is a common hand condition that can be treated with surgery. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess whether ultrasound-guided (US-guided) percutaneous surgery is superior to other conventional surgical methods.

METHODS

We conducted a comprehensive search in Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Library to identify relevant studies. We included randomized clinical trials (RCTs) and observational studies comparing US-guided TF release with blind percutaneous or open approaches. We combined Risk Ratios (RR) and Mean Differences (MD) with 95% Confidence Intervals (CI) across studies. Data processing and analysis were conducted using R software, version 4.3.1.

RESULTS

Our analysis included eight RCTs and two observational studies with 555 patients. US-guided surgery significantly reduced postoperative DASH scores (MD -3.75 points; 95% CI = -7.48, -0.02; p < 0.01), shortened time to resume activities (MD -11.52 days; 95% CI = -16.13, -6.91; p < 0.01), hastened discontinuation of oral analgesics (MD -4.44 days; 95% CI = -8.01, -0.87; p < 0.01), and improved patient satisfaction scores (RR 1.13; 95% CI = 1.04, 1.23; p = 0.75). There were no significant differences in VAS scores, time to movement recovery, or surgical success rate.

CONCLUSION

Ultrasound-guided percutaneous release is a safe, effective, and superior alternative for treating TF compared to other methods, leading to improved DASH scores, quicker recovery, faster cessation of oral analgesics, and enhanced patient satisfaction.

Ultrasound-guided minimally invasive thread release of Guyon's canal: initial experience in cadaveric specimens

OBJECTIVE

Guyon's canal syndrome is caused by compression of the ulnar nerve at the wrist, occasionally requiring decompression surgery. In recent times, minimally invasive approaches have gained popularity. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of ultrasound-guided thread release for transecting the palmar ligament in Guyon's canal without harming surrounding structures, in a cadaveric specimen model.

METHODS

After ethical approval, thirteen ultrasound-guided thread releases of Guyon's canal were performed on the wrists of softly embalmed anatomic specimens. Cadavers showing injuries or prior operations at the hand were excluded. Subsequently, the specimens were dissected, and the outcome of the interventions and potential damage to adjacent anatomical structures as well as ultrasound visibility were evaluated with a score from one to three.

RESULTS

Out of 13 interventions, a complete transection was achieved in ten cases (76.9%), and a partial transection was documented in three cases (23.1%). Irrelevant lesions on the flexor tendons were observed in two cases (15.4%), and an arterial branch was damaged in one (7.7%). Ultrasound visibility varied among specimens, but essential structures were delineated in all cases.

CONCLUSION

Ultrasound-guided thread release of Guyon's canal has shown promising first results in anatomic specimens. However, further studies are required to ensure the safety of the procedure.

RELEVANCE STATEMENT

Our study showed that minimally invasive ultrasound-guided thread release of Guyon's canal is a feasible approach in the anatomical model. The results may provide a basis for further research and refinement of this technique.

KEY POINTS

• In Guyon's canal syndrome, the ulnar nerve is compressed at the wrist, often requiring surgical release. • We adapted and tested a minimally invasive ultrasound-guided thread release technique in anatomic specimens. • The technique was effective; however, in one specimen, a small anatomic branch was damaged.

Ultrasound-guided percutaneous opening of the A1 pulley with surgical knife on anterograde versus retrograde approach: A comparative cadaver study (40 fingers)

OBJECTIVE

Trigger finger is one of the most common pathologies of the finger flexor mechanism. Previous studies have shown the value of ultrasound-guided percutaneous tenolysis. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of anterograde versus retrograde percutaneous ultrasound-guided tenolysis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was a comparative cadaver study performed between December 2021 and April 2022 in France, with 40 fresh cadaver fingers. Thumbs were excluded. A single surgeon performed 20 ultrasound-guided anterograde releases and 20 ultrasound-guided retrograde releases, using a second-generation minimally invasive surgical knife, and a multipurpose linear ultrasound transducer. The primary endpoint was the success of ultrasound-guided release, defined as complete opening of the A1 pulley along its entire length.

RESULTS

The success rate was 90% in the retrograde group and 95% in the anterograde group (non-significant difference: p = 0.56). There was no significant difference in superficial flexor tendon slip injuries or partial A2 pulley injuries. There were no neurovascular pedicle lesions.

CONCLUSION

The choice of anterograde or retrograde ultrasound-guided tenolysis should be left to the surgeon's discretion.

Ultrasound-Guided A1 Pulley Release: A Systematic Review

The purpose of this review was to summarize the current literature pertaining to ultrasound-guided percutaneous A1 pulley release procedures. We searched PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, and Web of Science for clinical studies examining ultrasound-guided percutaneous A1 pulley release. A total of 17 studies involving 749 procedures were included in this review. The overall success rate was 97%. There were 23 minor complications (4 cases of hematomas, 15 cases of persistent pain, and 4 cases of transient numbness) and no major complications reported. Ultrasound-guided A1 pulley release is an effective and safe procedure for the treatment of trigger fingers and thumb.

Percutaneous release for trigger thumb in children under local anesthesia

Trigger thumb surgery can be performed through open surgery or percutaneous release. Open surgery often requires hospitalization, an operating room, a surgical incision, and postoperative wound care; however, percutaneous release does not require hospitalization or surgery, and is relatively easier and faster. We aimed to assess the results of percutaneous A-1 pulley release using local anesthesia without hospitalization for the treatment of pediatric trigger thumb. In this retrospective study, we included patients operated on between March 2013 and August 2020 with the diagnosis of trigger thumb. The percutaneous release under local anesthesia was applied to all the children by one orthopedic surgeon. All percutaneous release procedures were performed in outpatient clinic conditions. There were 183 children (218 thumbs) who were enrolled in the clinic. Eighty-seven patients were male (47.5%) and 96 were female (52.5%). The average follow-up duration was 5 years (1-8.5 years). Among the 218 trigger thumb cases, 211 were satisfactory (successful result rate 96.8%). Relapse was seen in only 3 thumbs in the early postoperative period. No patient experienced neurovascular deficit or infection. The percutaneous surgical release in pediatric trigger thumb treatment is a simple, minimally invasive procedure that can be done in an outpatient setting under local anesthesia. In addition, the procedure duration is short and has minimal complication rates and maximum patient satisfaction. Level of Evidence III.

Ex vivo evaluation of a percutaneous thread-transecting technique for desmotomy of normal palmar/plantar annular ligaments in horses

OBJECTIVE

To develop and describe a minimally invasive, ultrasound-guided, percutaneous technique for the desmotomy of equine palmar/plantar annular ligaments (PALs) using a transecting thread.

STUDY DESIGN

Ex vivo study.

SAMPLE POPULATION

Twenty-one normal equine distal limb specimens.

METHODS

Under ultrasonographic guidance, a surgical thread was percutaneously placed around the PAL through 2 skin punctures (proximal and distal) using a 18 gauge spinal needle in equine limbs (11 forelimbs, 10 hindlimbs) with normal PALs. The ligament was transected by a back-and-forth motion of the thread until the loop emerged from the proximal skin puncture site. Each specimen was dissected and assessed for completeness of transection and iatrogenic damage under direct visualization. Descriptive statistics were reported.

RESULTS

The PAL was completely transected in 17/21 limbs. The mean duration of the procedure was 16 minutes. Superficial needle puncture or subtle abrasion of the superficial digital flexor tendon was noticed in 4 limbs. No iatrogenic injury to other intrathecal structures was identified. After PAL division, the needle entry and exit points had a mean diameter of 1.2 and 1 mm, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Desmotomy of normal PALs in equine limb specimens was performed effectively using the percutaneous thread-transecting technique with minimal iatrogenic damage to adjacent structures.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

Information from this study will allow refinement of the technique for use in equine clinical cases either in standing or anesthetized horses.

Current Concepts in the Management of Advanced Trigger Finger: A Critical Analysis Review

»

While the majority of patients with trigger finger obtain excellent outcomes from nonoperative treatment or release of the A1 pulley, a subset of patients with advanced trigger finger, defined as trigger finger with loss of active or passive range of motion, may have incomplete symptom relief and warrant specific attention.

»

Advanced trigger finger is more refractory to complete symptom resolution from corticosteroid injection, and particular attention should be paid to incomplete improvement of flexion contractures.

»

Unlike simple trigger finger, the pathology in advanced trigger finger involves not only the A1 pulley but also the flexor tendon, including thickening and degeneration.

»

Progression toward surgical intervention should not be delayed when nonoperative measures fail, and specific attention should be paid to persistent inability to achieve full extension following A1 pulley release.

»

Facing substantial residual flexion contracture, reduction flexor tenoplasty and partial or complete resection of the superficialis tendon followed by hand therapy and splinting may be needed to allow patients to regain reliable full range of motion.

Current Concepts in the Management of Trigger Finger in Adults

Trigger finger (TF) is one of the most common causes of hand disability. Immobilization of TF with a joint-blocking orthosis has been demonstrated to effectively relieve pain and improve function. The efficacy of steroid injections for TF varies based on the number of affected digits and the clinical severity of the condition. Up to three repeat steroid injections are effective in most patients. When conservative interventions are unsuccessful, open surgical release of the A1 pulley effectively alleviates the subjective and objective manifestations of TF and currently remains the benchmark procedure for addressing TF. Although several studies have emerged suggesting that a percutaneous approach may result in improved outcomes, this technique demands a learning curve that may predispose patients to higher risk of procedure-related complications. There is no role for preoperative antibiotics in patients who undergo elective soft-tissue procedures of the hand. WALANT anesthesia has gained popularity because it has been associated with improved patient outcomes and a clear cost savings; however, proper patient selection is critical. Similar to other soft-tissue hand procedures, TF surgery rarely necessitates a postoperative opioid prescription.

Clinical indications for image-guided interventional procedures in the musculoskeletal system: a Delphi-based consensus paper from the European Society of Musculoskeletal Radiology (ESSR)-Part II, elbow and wrist

BACKGROUND

Although image-guided interventional procedures of the elbow and wrist are routinely performed, there is poor evidence in the literature concerning such treatments. Our aim was to perform a Delphi-based consensus on published evidence on image-guided interventional procedures around the elbow and wrist and provide clinical indications on this topic.

METHODS

A board of 45 experts in image-guided interventional musculoskeletal procedures from the European Society of Musculoskeletal Radiology were involved in this Delphi-based consensus study. All panelists reviewed and scored published papers on image-guided interventional procedures around the elbow and wrist updated to September 2018 according to the Oxford Centre for Evidence-based Medicine levels of evidence. Consensus on statements drafted by the panelists about clinical indications was considered as "strong" when more than 95% of panelists agreed and as "broad" if more than 80% agreed.

RESULTS

Eighteen statements were drafted, 12 about tendon procedures and 6 about intra-articular procedures. Only statement #15 reached the highest level of evidence (ultrasound-guided steroid wrist injections result in greater pain reduction and greater likelihood of attaining clinically important improvement). Seventeen statements received strong consensus (94%), while one received broad consensus (6%).

CONCLUSIONS

There is still poor evidence in published papers on image-guided interventional procedures around the elbow and wrist. A strong consensus has been achieved in 17/18 (94%) statements provided by the panel on clinical indications. Large prospective randomized trials are needed to better define the role of these procedures in clinical practice.

KEY POINTS

• The panel provided 18 evidence-based statements on clinical indications of image-guided interventional procedures around the elbow and wrist. • Only statement #15 reached the highest level of evidence: ultrasound-guided steroid wrist injections result in greater pain reduction and greater likelihood of attaining clinically important improvement. • Seventeen statements received strong consensus (94%), while broad consensus was obtained by 1 statement (6%).

A cadaveric study using the ultra-minimally invasive thread transection technique to decompress the superficial peroneal nerve in the lower leg

BACKGROUND

After successful applications of the ultra-minimally invasive thread transecting technique (Guo Technique) for both thread carpal tunnel release and thread trigger finger release, we hypothesized that this technique could be used for superficial peroneal nerve release in the lower leg by selective crural fasciectomy. This study is aimed at testing the operative feasibility of performing the thread superficial peroneal nerve release (TSPNR) procedure in cadavers.

METHODS

The TSPNR procedure was performed on 15 fresh frozen cadaveric lower-extremity specimens under ultrasound guidance. All cadaveric specimens were dissected and visually assessed immediately after the procedures.

RESULTS

All 15 legs demonstrated a complete transection of the crural fasciae along the course of the superficial peroneal nerve (SPN) including where it penetrated and traversed the crural fascia. There was no evidence of any iatrogenic damage to the neurovascular bundle or adjacent tendons. The average operating time was less than 20 min.

CONCLUSION

This cadaveric study demonstrated that the technique of TSPNR was accurate, reliable, and feasible while causing no injury to adjacent neurovascular structures and avoiding having to make a skin incision. Further studies are warranted to verify the results of this study before implementing this new technique in the clinical setting.

Thread common peroneal nerve release-a cadaveric validation study

OBJECTIVE

To determine if the thread release technique can be applied to common peroneal nerve entrapment at the fibular neck.

METHODS

The thread common peroneal nerve release was performed on 15 fresh frozen cadaveric lower extremity specimens. All procedures were performed under ultrasound guidance and immediately underwent post-procedural gross anatomic inspection for completeness of decompression and presence or absence of iatrogenic neurovascular injury.

RESULTS

All 15 specimens demonstrated complete transection of the deep fascia of the peroneus longus overlying the common peroneal nerve. The transections extended to the bifurcation of the superficial peroneal and deep peroneal nerves. There was no evidence of any iatrogenic damage to the neurovascular bundle or adjacent tendons. The average operating time was less than 30 min.

CONCLUSION

This cadaveric validation study demonstrates the accuracy of the thread common peroneal nerve release. Future pilot studies are warranted to ensure the safety of this procedure in the clinical setting.

Cost Implications of Varying the Surgical Setting and Anesthesia Type for Trigger Finger Release Surgery

Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text.

Background:

Trigger finger release (TFR) is a common surgical procedure, representing a financial burden to the healthcare system. Our null hypothesis is that the choice surgical setting [operating room (OR) versus procedure room (PR)] and anesthetic type [local-only or monitored anesthesia care (MAC)] do not affect surgical encounter costs for TFR.

Methods:

Adult patients undergoing isolated unilateral TFR between May 2014 and December 2017 by 5 fellowship-trained hand surgeons at a single academic medical center were identified by Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) code (26055). We excluded patients undergoing revision surgery, tenosynovectomy, or additional procedures. Using our institution’s information technology value tools, we calculated total direct costs for each surgical encounter, which were compared between groups. Univariate and multivariable gamma regression were used to model costs.

Results:

Of 210 included patients, 54% (113/210) of cases were performed in the PR and 46% (97/210) in the OR. No significant differences in demographics were observed between PR and OR groups. Compared to local-only in the PR, the OR with local-only, and OR with MAC, demonstrated 2.2- and 3.2-fold greater median costs. Multivariable models suggested that use of the OR independently led to 221% [95% Confidence interval: 137%–345%; P < 0.01] greater mean costs than the PR, and use of MAC was associated with 30% (95% confidence interval: 13%–49%; P < 0.01) greater mean costs for OR cases than local-only, while controlling for other confounders.

Conclusion:

Performing TFR in the PR setting under local-only anesthesia minimizes surgical encounter direct costs for this common procedure.