Flexor Tenosynovial Fistula as a Complication after Endoscopic Trigger Finger Release: A Case Report

OBJECTIVE

We report a rare case of flexor tenosynovial fistula secondary to endoscopic release of the A1 pulley for treatment of trigger finger.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 72-year-old woman underwent endoscopic release of the A1 pulleys of her left ring and right middle fingers. Nine days after surgery, the wound at the base of the proximal phalanx of the ring finger (distal portal) remained open and a clear liquid discharge was seen. The volume of discharge increased with active finger motion. However, there was no evidence of infection. The patient was diagnosed with tenosynovial fistula as a complication of endoscopic release of the A1 pulley. At day 30, the fistula and drainage persisted and the condition was managed by surgical excision of the fistula and primary closure. The wound then healed completely.

CONCLUSION

Our report alerts hand surgeons to the potential development of flexor tenosynovial fistula as a very rare complication following endoscopic release of the A1 pulley for the treatment of trigger finger.

Ultrasound-guided percutaneous opening of the A1 pulley with surgical knife on anterograde versus retrograde approach: A comparative cadaver study (40 fingers)

OBJECTIVE

Trigger finger is one of the most common pathologies of the finger flexor mechanism. Previous studies have shown the value of ultrasound-guided percutaneous tenolysis. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of anterograde versus retrograde percutaneous ultrasound-guided tenolysis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was a comparative cadaver study performed between December 2021 and April 2022 in France, with 40 fresh cadaver fingers. Thumbs were excluded. A single surgeon performed 20 ultrasound-guided anterograde releases and 20 ultrasound-guided retrograde releases, using a second-generation minimally invasive surgical knife, and a multipurpose linear ultrasound transducer. The primary endpoint was the success of ultrasound-guided release, defined as complete opening of the A1 pulley along its entire length.

RESULTS

The success rate was 90% in the retrograde group and 95% in the anterograde group (non-significant difference: p = 0.56). There was no significant difference in superficial flexor tendon slip injuries or partial A2 pulley injuries. There were no neurovascular pedicle lesions.

CONCLUSION

The choice of anterograde or retrograde ultrasound-guided tenolysis should be left to the surgeon's discretion.

Early postoperative dressing removal in hand surgery: Novel concepts for individualized surgical dressing management

Postoperative dressing protocols after clean surgery without implant vary widely. The purpose of this study was to elucidate whether early postoperative dressing removal is a valid option, as compared to untouched dressing or twice-weekly dressing change approach. A prospective randomized study was conducted on patients who underwent carpal tunnel release (CTR) or trigger finger release (TFR) between January and November 2020. Patients were randomly distributed into 3 groups: surgical dressing untouched until first follow up (SDU); surgical dressing changed twice a week in a health maintenance organization (HMO); and surgical dressing removed at first postoperative day (SDR). Data collected included patient characteristics, pre-and post-operative functional (QuickDASH) and autonomy (Instrumental Activities of Daily Living performance (IADL)) scores, Vancouver scar scale (VSS) and potential complications. Eighty-four patients were included: 28 (33.3%), 29 (34.5%) and 27 (32.1%) in the SDU, HMO and SDR groups, respectively. Deterioration in mean IADL score at 2-week follow-up was statistically significant in the HMO group (mean delta 3.35, p = 0.008). Quick DASH score improved significantly between preoperative and 2-week follow-up values only in the SDU group (mean delta 9.12, p = 0.012). Other parameters, including wound complications, did not differ significantly between groups. Early removal of postoperative dressing and immediate wound exposure was a safe option after CTR and TFR. An untouched bulky dressing correlated with early functional improvement. Finally, iterative dressing change in HMO showed no benefit and led to significant deterioration in early postoperative autonomy. IRB APPROVAL: 0548-18-TLV. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: I.