Arthroscopic debridement does not enhance surgical treatment of intra-articular distal radius fractures: a randomized controlled trial

Adjuvant Arthroscopy Does Not Improve the Functional Outcome of Volar Locking Plate for Distal Radius Fractures: A Randomized Clinical Trial

PURPOSE

To evaluate the outcomes of adding arthroscopy to osteosynthesis of distal radius fractures (DRF) with volar locking plate (VLP), by Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE) 1 year after surgery.

METHODS

In total, 186 functionally independent adult patients who met the inclusion criteria (DRF and a clinical decision for surgery with a VLP) were randomized to arthroscopic assistance or not. Primary outcome was PRWE questionnaire results 1 year after surgery. For the main variable, PRWE, we obtained the minimal clinically important difference based on a distribution-based method. Secondary outcomes included Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand and 12-Item Short Form Health Survey questionnaires, range of motion, strength, radiographic measures, and presence of joint step-offs by computed tomography. Data were collected preoperatively and at +1 and +4 weeks, +3 and +6 months, and +1 year after surgery. Complications were recorded throughout the study.

RESULTS

In total, 180 patients (mean age: 59.0 ± 14.9 years; 76% women) were analyzed by modified intention to treat. A total of 82% of the fractures were intra-articular (AO type C). No significant difference between arthroscopic (AG) and control (CG) groups in median PRWE was found at +1 year (median AG: 5.0, median CG: 7.5, difference in medians 2.5; 95% confidence interval [CI] -2.0, 7.0, P = .328). The proportion of patients who exceeded the minimal clinically important difference of 12.81 points in the AG and CG was 86.4% vs 85.1%, P = .819, respectively. Percentage of associated injuries and step-offs reduction maneuvers was greater with arthroscopy (mean differences: 17.1 95% CI -0.1, 26.1, P < .001) and 17.4 (95% CI 5.0, 29.7, P = .007). The difference in percentage of residual joint step-offs at the postsurgical computed tomography in radioulnar, radioscaphoid, and radiolunate joints was not significant (P = .990, P = .538, and P = .063). Complications were similar between groups (16.9% vs 20.9%, P = .842).

CONCLUSIONS

Adjuvant arthroscopy did not significantly improve PRWE score +1 year after surgery for DRF with VLP, although the statistical power of the study is below the initially estimated to detect the expected difference.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level I, randomized controlled trial.

Arthroscopic Assistance in Surgical Management of Distal Radius Fractures: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Background  Wrist arthroscopy has become a commonly used tool for the management of adults with distal radius fractures (DRFs), although its implementation requires technical competence. This systematic review and meta-analysis appraised the available evidence concerning the contribution of wrist arthroscopy to the functional and radiological outcomes of patients with DRFs operated with arthroscopic assistance. Methods  Randomized control trials were identified through five principal electronic databases on May 31, 2022: Web of Science, Scopus, EBSCO, Embase, and PubMed. Two authors independently performed the search and data extraction and assessed risk of bias (RoB) using the Cochrane RoB tool. Results  A total of 1,780 relevant abstracts and citations were extracted in the preliminary search, which yielded 6 trials that met the eligibility criteria, and 3 studies were included in the quantitative synthesis. The overall pooled mean difference (MD) estimate showed no significant difference in the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand scores between surgical groups with and without arthroscopic assistance (MD = 0.77 points, 95% confidence interval = -6.58 to 5.03, p  = 0.79), with substantial heterogeneity (I 2  = 85%). Conclusion  There was low-quality evidence that wrist arthroscopy conveyed not clinically or statistically significant difference to functional outcomes of patients with DRFs. However, our findings are limited by the numbers of studies included and lack of long-term follow-up, although they do provide a good starting point for future quality research.

Concomitant ligament injuries can be left untreated during surgery of distal radial fractures

Instability of the distal radioulnar joint and scapholunate dissociation may cause pain, functional impairment and subsequent arthrosis. There is no consensus about whether these injuries should be treated acutely in patients undergoing surgery for distal radial fractures. We conducted a prospective cohort study to determine whether concomitant distal radioulnar joint instability or scapholunate dissociation negatively influence patient-related outcomes in these patients. The primary outcome was the patient-reported wrist/hand evaluation at 6 and 12 months after surgery. Out of 62 patients, 58% and 27% had intraoperative distal radioulnar joint instability and scapholunate dissociation, respectively. No significant differences were found in patient-reported scores at follow-up between patients with stable and unstable distal radioulnar joints, nor between patients with and without scapholunate dissociation. Sixty-three per cent of patients with an unstable distal radioulnar joint during surgery were stable on retesting after 6 months. Our study suggests that a wait-and-see policy in these patients therefore seems reasonable.Level of evidence: III.

Minimal invasions: is wrist arthroscopy supported by evidence? A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Wrist arthroscopy is used increasingly, but its benefits and harms are unclear. This systematic review aimed to identify all published randomized controlled trials on wrist arthroscopy and synthesize the evidence of the benefits and harms of wrist arthroscopic procedures.

METHODS

We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and Embase for randomized controlled trials comparing wrist-arthroscopic surgery with corresponding open surgery, placebo surgery, a non-surgical treatment, or no treatment. We estimated the treatment effect with a random effect meta-analysis using patient reported outcome measure (PROM) as primary outcome where several studies assessed the same intervention.

RESULTS

Of 7 included studies, none compared wrist arthroscopic procedures with no treatment or placebo surgery. 3 trials compared arthroscopically assisted reduction with fluoroscopic reduction of intra-articular distal radius fractures. The certainty of evidence was low to very low for all comparisons. The benefit of arthroscopy was clinically unimportant (smaller than what patients may consider meaningful) at all time points. 2 studies compared arthroscopic and open resection of wrist ganglia, finding no significant difference in recurrence rates. 1 study estimated the benefit of arthroscopic joint debridement and irrigation in intra-articular distal radius fractures, showing no clinically relevant benefit. 1 study compared arthroscopic triangular fibrocartilage complex repair with splinting in distal radioulnar joint instability in people with distal radius fractures, finding no evidence of benefits for repair at the long-term follow-up but the study was unblinded, and the estimates imprecise.

CONCLUSION

The current limited evidence from RCTs does not support benefits of wrist arthroscopy compared with open or non-surgical interventions.

Arthroscopic debridement of the dorsal capsule in intraarticular distal radius fractures: does it provide superior outcomes?

INTRODUCTION

Distal radius fractures (DRFs) are very common. One of the most significant complications after intraarticular DRF is arthrofibrosis with loss of wrist motion and pain. Wrist arthroscopy has become increasingly popular in the treatment of DRF with the advantage of good visualization of the joint surface and soft tissue injuries. In intraarticular DRFs injuries of the dorsal capsule are a characteristic finding which potentially cause loss of wrist motion. In this study, we investigated if arthroscopic debridement of dorsal capsule injuries at time of surgical fixation provides superior outcomes compared to the same treatment without debridement.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between 2013 and 2017, we included 42 patients who underwent arthroscopy-assisted palmar plating for intraarticular DRFs in a prospective randomized controlled study. In group A (intervention group), the dorsal capsule tears were debrided during primary surgery, while in group B these were left in place. Active range of motion (AROM), grip strength, subjective outcomes and radiographic results were assessed 3, 6 and 12 months after primary surgery. A subgroup analysis was performed for patient age, fracture severity and duration of immobilization.

RESULTS

Arthroscopic debridement of the dorsal capsule improved AROM in patients over 60 years of age, more severe fractures (AO 23 C2/C3) and prolonged postoperative immobilization for more than two weeks, while it was not relevant for younger patients with simple fractures and short immobilization.

CONCLUSIONS

Debridement of the injured dorsal capsule in arthroscopic-assisted surgical treatment of intraarticular DRFs can improve surgical performance and optimize patient outcomes in a specific subgroup of patients.

Outcomes of Arthroscopic-Assisted Distal Radius Fracture Volar Plating: A Meta-Analysis

PURPOSE

The use of wrist arthroscopy to assist fixation of distal radius fractures with volar locking plates (VLPs) has been gaining popularity in recent years; however, there is no consensus on its benefits. This meta-analysis compares outcomes of arthroscopic-assisted VLP to fluoroscopic-assisted VLP in distal radius fractures through a systematic review of the published literature.

METHODS

A systematic search of publications from databases (Medline, EMBASE, Scopus, and Cochrane) was obtained from inception to May 2020. A random-effects meta-analysis was used to calculate effect sizes. Outcomes included postoperative radiographic reduction (gap, stepoff, radial inclination, volar tilt, and ulnar variance), procedural outcomes (operative time, additional soft tissue injuries and complications), and functional outcomes (range of motion; visual analog scale score; Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand score; Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation score; Mayo clinic score; and grip strength).

RESULTS

Six studies, involving 280 patients, met the final inclusion criteria. The meta-analysis for postoperative stepoff was statistically significant, favoring arthroscopic-assisted VLP. In addition, there was greater identification of associated soft tissue injuries, increased wrist extension, and a longer operative duration when performing arthroscopic-assisted VLP fixation. There were no differences in other postoperative radiographic outcomes, complications, or functional outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

The current literature suggests that arthroscopic-assisted VLP is a useful adjunct to intra-articular reduction and treatment of associated soft tissue injuries in distal radius fractures. Considerations should include operative time, costs, and the additional training required. Further studies are needed to assess functional outcomes.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic II.

American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons/American Society for Surgery of the Hand Clinical Practice Guideline Summary Management of Distal Radius Fractures

The Management of Distal Radius Fractures Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guideline is based on a systematic review of published studies for the treatment of distal radius fractures in adults older than 18 years. The scope of this guideline is limited to the treatment of acute distal radius fractures and does not address distal radius malunion. This guideline contains seven recommendations to assist orthopaedic surgeons and all qualified physicians managing patients with acute distal radius fractures based on the best current available evidence. It serves as an information resource for professional healthcare practitioners and developers of practice guidelines and recommendations. In addition to providing pragmatic practice recommendations, this guideline also highlights gaps in the literature and informs areas for future research and quality measure development.

Adult Distal Radius Fracture Management

Distal radius fractures (DRFs) are some of the most commonly encountered fractures, and the incidence is increasing. Optimal treatment remains controversial. Critical evaluation of the initial imaging is necessary to recognize fracture characteristics and stability. The fracture pattern, injury mechanism, soft-tissue injury, patient characteristics, and surgeon preference are generally taken into consideration when choosing the most appropriate modality. Volar plating has become the workhorse of surgical DRF management but is not without complications. The surgeon should be comfortable using a wide variety of techniques to customize the fixation to the fracture pattern. Recognition of potential dangers and use of intraoperative imaging techniques can mitigate complications. Goals of rehabilitation after the initial treatment of DRF include regaining motion, strength, and ultimately function while managing pain.

Volar Plate Fixation Versus Cast Immobilization in Acceptably Reduced Intra-Articular Distal Radial Fractures: A Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

The evidence for the treatment of acceptably reduced intra-articular distal radial fractures remains inconclusive. We therefore compared the functional outcomes of cast immobilization (nonoperative) and volar plate fixation (operative) for patients with these fractures.

METHODS

This multicenter randomized controlled trial enrolled patients between 18 and 75 years old with an acceptably reduced intra-articular distal radial fracture. Patients were randomized to nonoperative treatment or to operative treatment. The primary outcome measure was the Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE) score after 12 months. Secondary outcome measures were the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) questionnaire; the Short Form-36 (SF-36) questionnaire; a visual analog scale for pain; range of motion; grip strength; radiographic parameters; and complications. Analyses followed the intention-to-treat principle.

RESULTS

A total of 96 patients were randomized, and 90 (46 in the nonoperative group and 44 in the operative group) were included in the analysis. Patients treated in the operative group had significantly better functional outcomes measured with the PRWE at 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year. Additionally, a 28% rate of subsequent surgery was identified in the nonoperative group.

CONCLUSIONS

Adult patients with an acceptably reduced intra-articular distal radial fracture have better functional outcomes for 12 months when treated operatively instead of nonoperatively. We therefore recommend surgical treatment for patients with these fractures.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level I. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Arthroscopy in Distal Radius Fractures: Indications and When to Do It

Wrist arthroscopy in the setting of distal radius fractures allows for direct visualization of the articular surface and treatment of associated soft tissue injuries. Arthroscopic techniques may be used to fine tune reductions with residual articular step-off or gap after an initial reduction attempt and are critical for addressing free articular fragments and die-punch lesions. Surgeon training, experience, and comfort with wrist arthroscopy remains a barrier to widespread adoption of this technique. Level I studies are needed to investigate whether improved articular reduction leads to meaningful clinical differences.

Post-operative septic arthritis after arthroscopy: modern diagnostic and therapeutic concepts

PURPOSE

Septic arthritis is a significant complication following arthroscopic surgery, with an estimated overall incidence of less than 1%. Despite the low incidence, an appropriate diagnostic and therapeutic pathway is required to avoid serious long-term consequences, eradicate the infection, and ensure good treatment outcomes. The aim of this current review article is to summarize evidence-based literature regarding diagnostic and therapeutic options of post-operative septic arthritis after arthroscopy.

METHODS

Through a literature review, up-to-date treatment algorithms and therapies have been identified. Additionally, a supportive new algorithm is proposed for diagnosis and treatment of suspected septic arthritis following arthroscopic intervention.

RESULTS

A major challenge in diagnostics is the differentiation of the post-operative status between a non-infected hyperinflammatory joint versus septic arthritis, due to clinical symptoms, (e.g., rubor, calor, or tumor) can appear identical. Therefore, joint puncture for microbiological evaluation, especially for fast leukocyte cell-count diagnostics, is advocated. A cell count of more than 20.000 leukocyte/µl with more than 70% of polymorphonuclear cells is the generally accepted threshold for septic arthritis.

CONCLUSION

The therapy is based on arthroscopic or open surgical debridement for synovectomy and irrigation of the joint, in combination with an adequate antibiotic therapy for 6-12 weeks. Removal of indwelling hardware, such as interference screws for ACL repair or anchors for rotator cuff repair, is recommended in chronic cases.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Nonoperative treatment versus volar locking plate fixation for elderly patients with distal radial fracture: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

This systematic review and meta-analysis assessed the role of nonoperative treatment and volar locking plate (VLP) fixation in elderly patients with distal radial fracture.

Methods

The systematic literature review identified randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies using VLP and nonoperative treatment for distal radial fractures in the elderly. Two investigators independently extracted data and evaluated the quality of the studies. A meta-analysis was performed using RevMan version 5.3.

Results

The five RCTs and six observational studies included 585 and 604 patients in the VLP and nonoperation groups, respectively. The quality of these 11 studies was moderate. Compared to nonoperation treatment, VLP did not improve the disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand (DASH) score (weighted mean difference [WMD] = −1.67; 95% confidence interval [CI], −3.58–−0.24; P = 0.09), decrease complications (odds ratio = 1.05; 95% CI, 0.51–2.19; P = 0.89), or improve range of motion in flexion, extension, pronation, supination, and radial deviation. The VLP group had better grip strength (WMD = 10.52; 95% CI, 6.19–14.86; P < 0.0001) and radiographic assessment than the nonoperation group.

Conclusions

Although insufficient, the study evidence shows that VLP does not improve DASH scores, complications, or range of motion, but it might provide better grip strength and radiographic assessment than nonoperation treatment.

Arthroscopic assisted treatment of distal radius fractures and concomitant injuries

Wrist arthroscopy is mainly used to assist fracture reduction and fixation and to diagnose and treat concomitant injuries mainly to the scapholunate (SL), lunotriquetral (LT) ligament and the triangular fibrocartilage complex (TFCC). Arthroscopy is beneficial in improving anatomical reduction of fracture steps and gaps in intra-articular distal radius fractures (DRFs). Yet, the literature that the functional outcome correlates with the use of arthroscopy, is limited. Non-surgical treatment and immobilization is recommended for Geissler grade I-III Sl-ligament injuries, while open reduction, ligament suture and/or K-wire pinning is mandatory for complete ligament tears according to Geissler grade IV. This manuscript describes the current literature and gives insight into the authors' opinions and practice.