Total, gender- and age-specific incidence rates of upper extremity nerve injuries in Finland

Epidemiology and regional variance of traumatic peripheral nerve injuries in Sweden: A 15-year observational study

INTRODUCTION

Traumatic peripheral nerve injuries pose significant challenges to healthcare systems and individuals, affecting sensory function, causing neuropathic pain, and impairing quality of life. Despite their impact, comprehensive studies on the epidemiology and regional variance of these injuries are scarce. Understanding the incidence, trends, and anatomical distribution of such injuries is essential for targeted interventions and resource allocation.

METHODS

This observational study utilized register-based data from the Swedish National Patient Register covering the period from 2008 to 2022. Incidence rates, trends, and anatomical distribution of traumatic peripheral nerve injuries were analyzed using descriptive statistics, Poisson regression modeling, and regional comparisons.

RESULTS

Higher incidences of peripheral nerve injuries were observed among men compared to women across all age groups. The hand and wrist were the most commonly affected sites. Regional variations in incidence rates were evident, with some regions consistently exhibiting higher rates compared to others. Notably, a decreasing trend in injuries was observed over the study period.

CONCLUSION

This study underscores the importance of targeted interventions and preventive strategies, considering sex, age, and regional disparities. Further research incorporating individual patient-level data is warranted to enhance our understanding and inform tailored interventions to reduce the burden of these injuries.

Revealing digital nerve lesions-A comprehensive analysis of 2084 cases of a specialized center

BACKGROUND

Finger nerve injuries have a significant impact on hand function and can result in reduced sensation, pain and impaired coordination. The socioeconomic implications of these injuries include decreased workplace productivity, reduced earning potential, and financial burdens associated with long-term medical treatment and rehabilitation. However, there is a lack of comprehensive literature regarding the incidence, mechanisms, and associated injuries of finger nerve lesions.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted on patients treated at our institution from January 2012 to July 2020. Cases of peripheral finger nerve lesions were identified using the digital hospital information system and ICD-10 Classification. Exclusion criteria included injuries to the median nerve at the carpal tunnel level or superficial branch of the radial nerve. Data were collected using a pseudonymized approach, and statistical analyses were performed using SPSS Statistics (Version 27).

RESULTS

A total of 2089 finger nerve lesions were analyzed, with a majority of cases occurring in men. Most injuries97.4 % were caused by trauma, predominantly cut/tear injuries. Isolated finger nerve injuries were more common than multiple nerve injuries, with the index finger being the most frequently affected. Concomitant tendon and vascular injuries were observed in a significant proportion51.7 % of cases. Surgical management included direct nerve coaptation, interposition grafting and neurolysis.

DISCUSSION

Finger nerve injuries are the most prevalent type of nerve injury, often resulting from small lacerations. These injuries have substantial societal costs and can lead to prolonged sick leave. Understanding the epidemiology and etiology of finger nerve injuries is crucial for implementing effective preventive measures. Accompanying tendon injuries and the anatomical location of the nerve lesions can impact sensory recovery and treatment outcomes. Proper management of peripheral finger nerve lesions is essential for optimizing functional outcomes and minimizing the impact on daily activities. Treatment options should be tailored to the severity and underlying cause of the nerve injury.

Non degradation of chitosan and initial degradation of collagen nerve conduits used for protection of nerve coaptations

BACKGROUND

Nerve conduits are either used to bridge nerve gaps of up to 3 cm or to protect nerve coaptations. Biodegradable nerve conduits, which are currently commercially available, include Chitosan or collagen-based ones. As histological aspects of their degradation are highly relevant for the progress of neuronal regeneration, the aim of this study was to report the histopathological signs of such nerve conduits, which were removed during revision surgery.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Either Chitosan (n = 2) or collagen (n = 2) nerve conduits were implanted after neuroma resection and nerve grafting (n = 2) or traumatic nerve lesion after cut (n = 1) or crush injury (n = 1) in two females and two men, aged between 17 and 57 years. Revision surgery with removal of the nerve conduits was indicated due to persisting neuropathic pain and sensorimotor deficits, limited joint motion, or neurolysis with hardware removal at a median time of 17 months (range: 5.5-48 months). Histopathological analyses of all removed nerve conduits were performed.

RESULTS

A scar neuroma was diagnosed in one out of four patients. Mechanical complication occurred in one patient after nerve conduit implantation bridged over finger joints. Intraoperatively no or only initial signs of degradation of the nerve conduits were observed. Chitosan conduits revealed largely unchanged shape and structure of chitosan, and coating of the conduit by a vascularized fibrous membrane. The latter contained deposits taken up by macrophages, most likely representing dissolved chitosan. Characteristic histopathologic features of the degradation of collagen conduits were a disintegration of the compact collagen into separate fine circular strands, No foreign body reaction was observed in all removed nerve conduits.

CONCLUSIONS

Both Chitosan nerve conduits have not been degraded. The collagen nerve conduits showed a beginning degradation process. Furthermore, wrapping the repaired nerve with a nerve conduit did neither prevent adhesions nor improved nerve gliding. Therefore, biodegradation in time should be particularly addressed in further developments of nerve conduits.

Neuromas cause severe residual problems at long-term despite surgery

Pain, and disabilities after neuroma surgery, using patient reported outcome measurements (PROMs), were evaluated by QuickDASH and a specific Hand Questionnaire (HQ-8). The 69 responding individuals (response rate 61%; 59% women; 41% men; median follow up 51 months) reported high QuickDASH score, pain on load, cold sensitivity, ability to perform daily activities and sleeping difficulties. Individuals reporting impaired ability to perform daily activities and sleeping problems had higher scores for pain, stiffness, weakness, numbness/tingling, cold sensitivity and QuickDASH. Only 17% of individuals reported no limitations at all. No differences were observed between sexes. Surgical methods did not influence outcome. Symptoms and disabilities correlated moderately-strongly to each other and to ability to perform regular daily activities as well as to sleeping difficulties. Pain, cold sensitivity, sleeping difficulties and limitation to perform daily activities were associated to higher QuickDASH. A weak association was found between follow up time and QuickDASH score as well as pain on load, but not cold sensitivity. A major nerve injury was frequent among those with limitations during work/performing other regular daily activities. Despite surgical treatment, neuromas cause residual problems, which affect the capacity to perform daily activities and ability to sleep with limited improvement in long-term.

Evaluation of Processed Nerve Allograft in Peripheral Nerve Surgery: A Systematic Review and Critical Appraisal

Peripheral nerve injuries cause substantial problems when not treated properly. A specific problem is reconstruction of nerve defects, which can be treated in different ways. This study aimed to systematically review whether processed nerve allograft (PNA) is justified in reconstruction of a nerve defect in patients after posttraumatic or iatrogenic peripheral nerve injury and to compare PNA with other established methods.

Methods

A systematic review with a focused question, PICO (patient, intervention, comparison, outcome) and constraints, was performed. A structured literature search, including several databases, was done to evaluate the existing evidence for outcomes and postoperative complications related to PNA. The certainty of evidence was classified according to Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations.

Results

No conclusions, concerning differences in outcome of nerve reconstruction using PNA compared with the use of nerve autograft or conduits, could be drawn. The level of certainty for all evaluated outcomes was very low (⊕◯◯◯). Most published studies lack a control group to patients treated with PNA; being only descriptive, making it difficult to compare PNA with established methods without substantial risk of bias. For studies including a control group, the scientific evidence was of very low certainty, due to a low number of included patients, and large, undefined loss of patients during follow-up, rendering a high risk of bias. Finally, the authors often had financial disclosures.

Conclusion

Properly conducted randomized controlled trial studies on the use of PNA in reconstruction of peripheral nerve injuries are needed to establish recommendations in clinical practice.

The incidence and management of peripheral nerve injury in England (2005-2020)

Peripheral nerve injury (PNI) is a significant health problem that confers lifelong impact on those injured. Current interventions are purely surgical; however, outcomes remain poor. There is a lack of high-quality epidemiological data that is needed to identify populations involved, current healthcare demands, and ensure resources are distributed to the greatest effect, to reduce the injury burden.

METHODS

Anonymized hospital episode statistical (HES) data on admitted patient care was obtained from NHS Digital for all National Health Service (NHS) patients sustaining PNI of all body regions between 2005 and 2020. Total numbers of finished consultant episodes (FCEs) or FCEs/100,000 population were used to demonstrate changes in demographic variables, anatomical locations of injury, mechanisms of injury, speciality, and main operation.

RESULTS

There was a mean national incidence of 11.2 (95% CI 10.9, 11.6) events per 100,000 population per year. Males were at least twice as likely (p < 0.0001) to sustain a PNI. Upper limb nerves at or distal to the wrist were most commonly injured. Knife injuries increased (p < 0.0001), whereas glass injuries decreased (p < 0.0001). Plastic surgeons increasingly managed PNI (p = 0.002) as opposed to orthopaedic surgeons (p = 0.006) or neurosurgeons (p = 0.001). There was an increase in neurosynthesis (p = 0.022) and graft procedures (p < 0.0001) during the study period.

DISCUSSION

PNI is a significant national healthcare problem predominantly affecting distal, upper limb nerves of men of working age. Injury prevention strategies, improved targeted funding and rehabilitation pathways are needed to reduce the injury burden and improve patient care.