Diagnosis and management of pulmonary veno-occlusive disease

INTRODUCTION

Pulmonary veno-occlusive disease (PVOD) is an orphan disease and uncommon etiology of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) characterized by substantial small pulmonary vein and capillary involvement.

AREAS COVERED

PVOD, also known as 'PAH with features of venous/capillary involvement' in the current ESC/ERS classification.

EXPERT OPINION

In recent years, particular risk factors for PVOD have been recognized, including genetic susceptibilities and environmental factors (such as exposure to occupational organic solvents, chemotherapy, and potentially tobacco). The discovery of biallelic mutations in the EIF2AK4 gene as the cause of heritable PVOD has been a breakthrough in understanding the molecular basis of PVOD. Venous and capillary involvement (PVOD-like) has also been reported to be relatively common in connective tissue disease-associated PAH (especially systemic sclerosis), and in rare pulmonary diseases like sarcoidosis and pulmonary Langerhans cell granulomatosis. Although PVOD and pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) exhibit similarities, including severe precapillary PH, it is essential to differentiate between them since PVOD has a worse prognosis and requires specific management. Indeed, PVOD patients are characterized by poor response to PAH-approved drugs, which can lead to pulmonary edema and clinical deterioration. Due to the lack of effective treatments, early referral to a lung transplantation center is crucial.

Good response to pulmonary arterial hypertension-targeted therapy in 2 pulmonary veno-occlusive disease patients: A case report

RATIONALE

Pulmonary veno-occlusive disease (PVOD) is a kind of rare and fatal pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). Different from other subtypes of PAH, PVOD patients have a very poor prognosis because of the progressive nature of pulmonary vascular involvement and fatal pulmonary edema induced by PAH-targeted drugs. Lung transplantation is the only choice for these patients.

PATIENT CONCERNS

We reported 2 cases of PVOD which was misdiagnosed as idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension initially due to the lack of typical findings of PVOD. Right heart catheterization was done. The results showed severe PAH with mean pulmonary artery pressure at 76 mmHg and 68 mmHg.

DIAGNOSIS

The diagnosis of idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension was corrected by eukaryotic translation initiation factor 2 alpha kinase 4 (EIF2AK4) mutation screening. Biallelic mutations (c.1387delT (p. Arg463fs); c.989-990 delAA (p. Lys330fs)) were detected by next-generation sequencing for whole exome from blood sample. The presence of biallelic EIF2AK4 mutation was sufficient to confirm the diagnosis of PVOD.

INTERVENTIONS

The 2 patients had good response to PAH-targeted therapy (Ambrisentan 10 mg once a day and tadalafil 20 mg once a day) in the following 1 year.

OUTCOMES

Because the patients had a good response to targeted drugs, the treatment of the 2 cases was unchanged. Over 1-year period, they still have a good response to PAH-targeted drugs. There was no sign of pulmonary edema.

LESSONS

All these results may indicate that PVOD is not so rare and typical findings of PVOD are lacking in some patients. EIF2AK4 mutation screening by next-generation sequencing maybe useful to differentiate PVOD from other PAH subtypes. PVOD is a heterogeneity population and different patients have different characteristics including response to PAH-targeted therapy. How to pick off this portion of patients timely is the core issue. Further study is necessary to answer this question.

Targeted therapy in pulmonary veno-occlusive disease: time for a rethink?

Background

Pulmonary veno-occlusive disease (PVOD) is a rare condition with poor prognosis, and lung transplantation is recommended as the only curative therapy. The role of pulmonary arterial hypertension targeted therapy in PVOD remains controversial, and long-term effects of targeted therapy have been rarely reported. This study aims to retrospectively evaluate the role of targeted therapy in PVOD patients and the long-term outcome.

Methods

PVOD patients with good responses to targeted therapies were analyzed, and data pre- and post- targeted therapies were compared. An overview of the effects of targeted therapies on PVOD patients was also conducted.

Results

Five genetically or histologically confirmed PVOD patients received targeted therapies and showed good responses. Their mean pulmonary arterial pressure by right heart catheterization was 62.0 ± 11.7 mmHg. Two receiving monotherapy got stabilized, and three receiving sequential combination therapy got improved, cardiac function and exercise capacity significantly improved after treatments. No pulmonary edema occurred. The mean time from the first targeted therapy to the last follow up was 39.3 months, and the longest was 9 years. A systematic review regarding the effects of targeted therapies on PVOD patients indicated majorities of patients got hemodynamics or 6-min walk distance improved, and 26.7% patients developed pulmonary edema. The interval from targeted drugs use to death ranged from 71 min to over 4 years.

Conclusions

Cautious use of targeted therapy could safely and effectively improve or stabilize hemodynamics and exercise capacity of some patients without any complications. PVOD patients could live longer than expected.

Use of vasodilators for the treatment of pulmonary veno-occlusive disease and pulmonary capillary hemangiomatosis: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

There are several medications available to treat pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH): PAH-targeted drugs. However, in patients with pulmonary veno-occlusive disease and pulmonary capillary hemangiomatosis (PVOD/PCH), rare diseases that cause pulmonary hypertension, the effectiveness and safety of vasodilators, including PAH-targeted drugs, are unclear.

METHODS

We searched English-language publications listed in three electronic databases (PubMed, Cochrane Library, and the Japan Medical Abstracts Society). Reports with efficacy outcomes (survival, improvement in 6-minute walk distance, and pulmonary vascular resistance) and data on development of pulmonary edema after administration of vasodilators to patients with PVOD/PCH were selected (1966 to August 2015).

RESULTS

We identified 20 reports that met our criteria. No randomized controlled or prospective controlled studies were reported. The survival time ranged from 71 minutes to 4 years or more after initiation of vasodilators. Most of the reported cases showed an improvement in the 6-minute walk distance and pulmonary vascular resistance. Pulmonary edema was reported in 15 articles, some cases of which were lethal.

CONCLUSIONS

The present study demonstrates the potential efficacy and difficulties in the use of vasodilators in patients with PVOD/PCH; however, drawing a firm conclusion was difficult because of the lack of randomized controlled trials. Further research is needed to ascertain if vasodilator use is beneficial and safe in patients with PVOD/PCH.

Pulmonary hypertension secondary to pulmonary veno-occlusive disease complicated by right heart failure, hypotension and acute kidney injury

Pulmonary veno-occlusive disease (PVOD) is rare condition which can lead to severe pulmonary hypertension, right ventricular dysfunction, and cardiopulmonary failure. The diagnosis of PVOD can be challenging due to its nonspecific symptoms and its similarity to idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension and interstitial lung disease in terms of diagnostic findings. This case describes a 57 year old female patient who presented with a 5-month history of progressive dyspnea on exertion and nonproductive cough. Workup at another hospital was nonspecific and the patient underwent surgical lung biopsy due to concern for interstitial lung disease. She subsequently became hemodynamically unstable and was transferred to our hospital where she presented with severe hypoxemia, hypotension, and suprasystemic pulmonary artery pressures. Preliminary lung biopsy results suggested idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension and the patient was started on vasodilating agents, including continuous epoprostenol infusion. Pulmonary artery pressures decreased but remained suprasystemic and the patient did not improve. Final review of the biopsy by a specialized laboratory revealed a diagnosis of PVOD after which vasodilating therapy was immediately weaned off. Evaluation for dual heart-lung transplantation was begun. The patient's hospital course was complicated by hypotension requiring vasopressors, worsening right ventricular dysfunction, and acute kidney injury. During the transplantation evaluation, the patient decided that she did not want to undergo continued attempts at stabilization of her progressive multi-organ dysfunction and she was transitioned to comfort care. She expired hours after removing inotropic support.

Pulmonary veno-occlusive disease

Pulmonary veno-occlusive disease (PVOD) is a rare form of pulmonary hypertension (PH) characterised by preferential remodelling of the pulmonary venules. In the current PH classification, PVOD and pulmonary capillary haemangiomatosis (PCH) are considered to be a common entity and represent varied expressions of the same disease. The recent discovery of biallelic mutations in the EIF2AK4 gene as the cause of heritable PVOD/PCH represents a major milestone in our understanding of the molecular pathogenesis of PVOD. Although PVOD and pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) share a similar clinical presentation, with features of severe precapillary PH, it is important to differentiate these two conditions as PVOD carries a worse prognosis and life-threatening pulmonary oedema may occur following the initiation of PAH therapy. An accurate diagnosis of PVOD based on noninvasive investigations is possible utilising oxygen parameters, low diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide and characteristic signs on high-resolution computed tomography of the chest. No evidence-based medical therapy exists for PVOD at present and lung transplantation remains the preferred definitive therapy for eligible patients.

Characteristics of patients with pulmonary venoocclusive disease awaiting transplantation

RATIONALE

Pulmonary venoocclusive disease (PVOD) is an uncommon cause of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). However, unlike PAH, treatment options for PVOD are usually quite limited. The impact of the lung allocation score on access to transplantation for patients with PVOD and the clinical course of these patients have not been well-described.

OBJECTIVES

To examine the association between the diagnosis of PVOD and lung transplantation for patients on the transplant waiting list.

METHODS

Patients with a diagnosis of PVOD and PAH registered on the United Network for Organ Sharing wait list for transplantation from May 4, 2005 to May 3, 2013 were included. Lung transplantation was the primary outcome measure. Multivariable analyses were performed to determine the odds of dying or receiving a lung transplant after listing. Survival was compared using Kaplan-Meier and competing risks methods.

RESULTS

Of 12,251 patients listed for lung transplantation, 49 with PVOD and 647 with PAH were identified. There were no significant differences in the lung allocation score between patients with PVOD and PAH at listing, transplant, or wait list removal for death/too sick for transplant. By 6 months, 22.6% of patients with PVOD had been removed from the wait list due to death, compared with 11.0% of patients with PAH (Chi-square P = 0.03). Patients with PVOD who died or were considered too sick for transplant were removed from the waiting list sooner after listing (22 vs. 105 d, P = 0.08). There was no difference in the proportion of patients with PVOD and PAH transplanted (50.0 vs. 47.6%, P = 0.60).

CONCLUSIONS

In the lung allocation score era, patients with PVOD may be at higher risk for death while on the transplant waiting list. After wait list registration, close monitoring for disease progression is advised.