Severe asthma care trajectories: the French RAMSES cohort

Background

The French RAMSES study is an observational prospective multicentre real-life cohort including severe asthmatic subjects. The objective of the study was to compare the characteristics of patients, in terms of phenotype and asthma care trajectories, between those managed by tertiary referral centres (TRCs) or secondary care centres (SCCs).

Methods

Patients were prospectively recruited and enrolled for a 5-year follow-up. Patients' characteristics were analysed at inclusion and compared between TRCs and SCCs.

Results

52 centres (24 TRCs and 28 SCCs) included 2046 patients: 1502 (73.4%) were included by a TRC and 544 (26.6%) by a SCC. Patients were mainly women (62%), 53±15 years old, 67% with Asthma Control Test <20; at inclusion, 14% received oral corticosteroids (OCS) and 66% biologics. Compared with the SCC group, the TRC group had more frequent comorbidities and lower blood eosinophil counts (262 versus 340 mm-3; p=0.0036). OCS and biologics use did not differ between groups, but patients in the TRC group benefited more frequently from an educational programme (26% versus 18%; p=0.0008) and received more frequently two or more sequential lines of biologics (33% versus 24%; p=0.0105). In-depth investigations were more frequently performed in the TRC group (allergy tests: 74% versus 62%; p<0.0001; exhaled nitric oxide fraction: 56% versus 21%; p<0.0001; induced sputum: 6% versus 3%; p=0.0390).

Conclusions

Phenotypes and care trajectories differed in the RAMSES cohort between SCCs and TRCs, probably related to different levels of asthma severity and differences in medical resources and practices among centres. This highlights the need for standardisation of severe asthma care.

Characterisation of airway disease associated with Sjögren disease

OBJECTIVE

Although airway disease associated with Sjögren's disease (Sjo-AD) is common, it is poorly studied compared with interstitial lung disease (ILD). In this study, we aimed to assess factors associated with Sjo-AD, the characteristics and prognosis of this manifestation.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective multicentric study involving nine centres. We included Sjo-AD patients confirmed by at least one clinician and one CT scan report. Clinical and biological data, pulmonary function test (PFT), and CT scans were collected. A single radiologist specialist in thoracic diseases reviewed CT scans. Sjo-AD patients were compared with Sjo controls without pulmonary involvement, randomly selected after matching for age and disease duration.

RESULTS

We included 31 Sjo-AD and 62 Sjo controls without pulmonary history. Sjo-AD had a higher disease activity (ESSDAI) compared with controls, even when excluding the pulmonary domain of the score (7 vs 3.8, p<0.05), mainly due to the biological activity. Sjo-AD was multilobar (72%) and associated with signs of both bronchiectasis and bronchiolitis (60%). Obstructive lung disease occurred in 32% at the time of Sjo-AD diagnosis. Overall, PFT was stable after 8.7±7 years follow-up but repeated CT scans showed extended lesions in 41% of cases within 6±3.2 years. No patient developed Sjo-ILD. Sjo-AD progression was independent of the global disease activity.

CONCLUSIONS

Sjo-AD preferentially affects Sjo patients with higher biological activity. It is often characterised as a diffuse disease, affecting both proximal and distal airways, with a slow evolution over time and no progression to Sjo-ILD.

Radiological pulmonary sequelae after COVID-19 and correlation with clinical and functional pulmonary evaluation: results of a prospective cohort

OBJECTIVES

Whether COVID-19 leads to long-term pulmonary sequelae or not remains unknown. The aim of this study was to assess the prevalence of persisting radiological pulmonary fibrotic lesions in patients hospitalized for COVID-19.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We conducted a prospective single-center study among patients hospitalized for COVID-19 between March and May 2020. Patients with residual symptoms or admitted into intensive care units were investigated 4 months after discharge by a chest CT (CCT) and pulmonary function tests (PFTs). The primary endpoint was the rate of persistent radiological fibrotic lesions after 4 months. Secondary endpoints included further CCT evaluation at 9 and 16 months, correlation of fibrotic lesions with clinical and PFT evaluation, and assessment of predictive factors.

RESULTS

Among the 1151 patients hospitalized for COVID-19, 169 patients performed a CCT at 4 months. CCTs showed pulmonary fibrotic lesions in 19% of the patients (32/169). These lesions were persistent at 9 months and 16 months in 97% (29/30) and 95% of patients (18/19) respectively. There was no significant clinical difference based on dyspnea scale in patients with pulmonary fibrosis. However, PFT evaluation showed significantly decreased diffusing lung capacity for carbon monoxide (p < 0.001) and total lung capacity (p < 0.001) in patients with radiological lesions. In multivariate analysis, the predictive factors of radiological pulmonary fibrotic lesions were pulmonary embolism (OR = 9.0), high-flow oxygen (OR = 6.37), and mechanical ventilation (OR = 3.49).

CONCLUSION

At 4 months, 19% of patients investigated after hospitalization for COVID-19 had radiological pulmonary fibrotic lesions; they persisted up to 16 months.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT

Whether COVID-19 leads to long-term pulmonary sequelae or not remains unknown. The aim of this study was to assess the prevalence of persisting radiological pulmonary fibrotic lesions in patients hospitalized for COVID-19. The prevalence of persisting lesions after COVID-19 remains unclear. We assessed this prevalence and predictive factors leading to fibrotic lesions in a large cohort. The respiratory clinical impact of these lesions was also assessed.

KEY POINTS

• Nineteen percent of patients hospitalized for COVID-19 had radiological fibrotic lesions at 4 months, remaining stable at 16 months. • COVID-19 fibrotic lesions did not match any infiltrative lung disease pattern. • COVID-19 fibrotic lesions were associated with pulmonary function test abnormalities but did not lead to clinical respiratory manifestation.

Outcomes and risk assessment in pulmonary veno-occlusive disease

Introduction

Pulmonary veno-occlusive disease (PVOD) is a rare and severe subtype of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). Although European Society of Cardiology/European Respiratory Society (ESC/ERS) guidelines advise assessing PAH severity at baseline and during follow-up, no existing risk assessment methods have been validated for PVOD. This study aimed to identify prognostic factors, examine the impact of treatment strategies and evaluate risk assessment methods for PVOD patients.

Methods

The study analysed all incident PVOD patients included in the French Pulmonary Hypertension Registry between 2006 and 2021. Survival was assessed based on initial treatment strategy and risk status and compared to a matched (age, sex, pulmonary vascular resistance) PAH group. Six risk assessment methods (number of four low-risk and three noninvasive low-risk variables, ESC/ERS guidelines three-strata and four-strata models, REVEAL 2.0 and Lite 2) were applied at baseline and early follow-up, and their accuracy was compared using Harrell's c-statistic.

Results

Among the 327 included PVOD patients, survival rates at 1, 3 and 5 years were 86%, 50% and 27%, respectively. Multivariate analysis showed that only 6-min walk distance was associated with survival, with no significant difference based on initial treatment strategy. All six risk assessment methods could discriminate mortality risk, and the ESC/ERS four-strata model was the most accurate at both baseline and follow-up (C-index 0.64 and 0.74). PVOD survival rates were consistently lower than PAH when comparing baseline risk status using the ESC/ERS four-strata model.

Conclusion

PVOD is associated with poor outcomes, and initial treatment strategies do not significantly affect survival. Risk assessment methods can be useful in predicting survival for PVOD patients.

KCNK3 channel is important for the ventilatory response to hypoxia in rats

To clarify the contribution of KCNK3/TASK-1 channel chemoreflex in response to hypoxia and hypercapnia, we used a unique Kcnk3-deficient rat. We assessed ventilatory variables using plethysmography in Kcnk3-deficient and wild-type rats at rest in response to hypoxia (10% O2) and hypercapnia (4% CO2). Immunostaining for C-Fos, a marker of neuronal activity, was performed to identify the regions of the respiratory neuronal network involved in the observed response.Under basal conditions, we observed increased minute ventilation in Kcnk3-deficient rats, which was associated with increased c-Fos positive cells in the ventrolateral region of the medulla oblongata. Kcnk3-deficient rats show an increase in ventilatory response to hypoxia without changes in response to hypercapnia. In Kcnk3-deficient rats, linked to an increased hypoxia response, we observed a greater increase in c-Fos-positive cells in the first central relay of peripheral chemoreceptors and Raphe Obscurus. This study reports that KCNK3/TASK-1 deficiency in rats induces an inadequate peripheral chemoreflex, alternating respiratory rhythmogenesis, and hypoxic chemoreflex.

Clinical relevance and prognostic value of renal Doppler in acute decompensated precapillary pulmonary hypertension

AIMS

We aim to evaluate the clinical relevance and the prognostic value of arterial and venous renal Doppler in acute decompensated precapillary pulmonary hypertension (PH).

METHODS AND RESULTS

The renal resistance index (RRI) and the Doppler-derived renal venous stasis index (RVSI) were monitored at admission and on Day 3 in a prospective cohort of precapillary PH patients managed in intensive care unit for acute right heart failure (RHF). The primary composite endpoint included death, circulatory assistance, urgent transplantation, or rehospitalization for acute RHF within 90 days following inclusion. Ninety-one patients were enrolled (58% female, age 58 ± 16 years). The primary endpoint event occurred in 32 patients (33%). In univariate logistic regression analysis, variables associated with RRI higher than the median value were non-variable parameters (age and history of hypertension), congestion (right atrial pressure and renal pulse pressure), cardiac function [tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE) and left ventricular outflow tract- velocity time integral], systemic pressures and NT-proBNP. Variables associated with RVSI higher than the median value were congestion (high central venous pressure, right atrial pressure, and renal pulse pressure), right cardiac function (TAPSE), severe tricuspid regurgitation, and systemic pressures. Inotropic support was more frequently required in patients with high RRI (P = 0.01) or high RVSI (P = 0.003) at the time of admission. At Day 3, a RRI value <0.9 was associated with a better prognosis after adjusting to the estimated glomerular filtration rate.

CONCLUSION

Renal Doppler provides additional information to assess the severity of patients admitted to the intensive care unit for acute decompensated precapillary PH.

Diagnosis and management of pulmonary veno-occlusive disease

INTRODUCTION

Pulmonary veno-occlusive disease (PVOD) is an orphan disease and uncommon etiology of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) characterized by substantial small pulmonary vein and capillary involvement.

AREAS COVERED

PVOD, also known as 'PAH with features of venous/capillary involvement' in the current ESC/ERS classification.

EXPERT OPINION

In recent years, particular risk factors for PVOD have been recognized, including genetic susceptibilities and environmental factors (such as exposure to occupational organic solvents, chemotherapy, and potentially tobacco). The discovery of biallelic mutations in the EIF2AK4 gene as the cause of heritable PVOD has been a breakthrough in understanding the molecular basis of PVOD. Venous and capillary involvement (PVOD-like) has also been reported to be relatively common in connective tissue disease-associated PAH (especially systemic sclerosis), and in rare pulmonary diseases like sarcoidosis and pulmonary Langerhans cell granulomatosis. Although PVOD and pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) exhibit similarities, including severe precapillary PH, it is essential to differentiate between them since PVOD has a worse prognosis and requires specific management. Indeed, PVOD patients are characterized by poor response to PAH-approved drugs, which can lead to pulmonary edema and clinical deterioration. Due to the lack of effective treatments, early referral to a lung transplantation center is crucial.

Serum and Pulmonary Expression Profiles of the Activin Signaling System in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension

BACKGROUND

Activins are novel therapeutic targets in pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). We therefore studied whether key members of the activin pathway could be used as PAH biomarkers.

METHODS

Serum levels of activin A, activin B, α-subunit of inhibin A and B proteins, and the antagonists follistatin and follistatin-like 3 (FSTL3) were measured in controls and in patients with newly diagnosed idiopathic, heritable, or anorexigen-associated PAH (n=80) at baseline and 3 to 4 months after treatment initiation. The primary outcome was death or lung transplantation. Expression patterns of the inhibin subunits, follistatin, FSTL3, Bambi, Cripto, and the activin receptors type I (ALK), type II (ACTRII), and betaglycan were analyzed in PAH and control lung tissues.

RESULTS

Death or lung transplantation occurred in 26 of 80 patients (32.5%) over a median follow-up of 69 (interquartile range, 50-81) months. Both baseline (hazard ratio, 1.001 [95% CI, 1.000-1.001]; P=0.037 and 1.263 [95% CI, 1.049-1.520]; P=0.014, respectively) and follow-up (hazard ratio, 1.003 [95% CI, 1.001-1.005]; P=0.001 and 1.365 [95% CI, 1.185-1.573]; P<0.001, respectively) serum levels of activin A and FSTL3 were associated with transplant-free survival in a model adjusted for age and sex. Thresholds determined by receiver operating characteristic analyses were 393 pg/mL for activin A and 16.6 ng/mL for FSTL3. When adjusted with New York Heart Association functional class, 6-minute walk distance, and N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide, the hazard ratios for transplant-free survival for baseline activin A <393 pg/mL and FSTL3 <16.6 ng/mL were, respectively, 0.14 (95% CI, 0.03-0.61; P=0.009) and 0.17 (95% CI, 0.06-0.45; P<0.001), and for follow-up measures, 0.23 (95% CI, 0.07-0.78; P=0.019) and 0.27 (95% CI, 0.09-0.78, P=0.015), respectively. Prognostic values of activin A and FSTL3 were confirmed in an independent external validation cohort. Histological analyses showed a nuclear accumulation of the phosphorylated form of Smad2/3, higher immunoreactivities for ACTRIIB, ALK2, ALK4, ALK5, ALK7, Cripto, and FSTL3 in vascular endothelial and smooth muscle layers, and lower immunostaining for inhibin-α and follistatin.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings offer new insights into the activin signaling system in PAH and show that activin A and FSTL3 are prognostic biomarkers for PAH.

[Post-COVID-19 syndrome]

In the aftermath of acute infection with the severe acute respiratory syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), a large number of symptoms persist or appear, constituting a real syndrome called "long COVID-19" or "post-COVID- 19" or "post-acute COVID-19 syndrome". Its incidence is very high, half of patients showing at least one symptom at 4-6 months after Coronarovirus infectious disease 2019 (COVID-19). They can affect many organs. The most common symptom is persistent fatigue, similar to that seen after other viral infections. Radiological pulmonary sequelae are relatively rare and not extensive. On the other hand, functional respiratory symptoms, primarily dyspnoea, are much more frequent. Dysfunctional breathing is a significant cause of dyspnoea. Cognitive disorders and psychological symptoms are also very common, with anxiety, depression and post-traumatic stress symptoms being widely described. On the other hand, cardiac, endocrine, cutaneous, digestive or renal sequelae are rarer. The symptoms generally improve after several months, even if their prevalence at two years remains significant. Most of the symptoms are favored by the severity of the initial illness, and the psychic symptoms by the female sex. The pathophysiology of most symptoms is poorly understood. The influence of the treatments used in the acute phase is also important. Vaccination, on the other hand, seems to reduce their incidence. The sheer number of affected patients makes long-term COVID-19 syndrome a public health challenge.

Severity and phenotypes of dyspnea in asthma: Impact of comorbidities

BACKGROUND

Dyspnea is a common but non-specific symptom of asthma, which in particular may be related to anxiety and hyperventilation syndrome, two frequent comorbidities of asthma.

METHODS

We conducted a prospective multicentric cohort study in dyspneic asthmatic adults. Dyspnea was assessed using the Multidimensional Dyspnea Profile questionnaire. We described the sensory (QS) and affective (A2) domains of dyspnea and investigated the effect of poor asthma control, hyperventilation and anxiety on each dimension at baseline and after 6 months.

RESULTS

We included 142 patients (65.5% women, age: 52 years). Dyspnea was severe and predominated on its sensory domain (median QS: 27/50; A2: 15/50). Uncontrolled asthma (ACQ≥1.5), hyperventilation symptoms (Nijmegen≥23) and anxiety (HAD-A≥10) were present in 75%, 45.7% and 39% of cases, respectively. Hyperventilation symptoms were associated with higher QS and A2 scores: QS at 28.4(10.7) vs. 21.7(12.8) (p = 0.001) and A2 at 24(14) vs. 11.3(11) (p < 0.001) in patients with vs. without hyperventilation symptoms. Anxiety was only associated with increased A2 (27(12.3) vs. 10.9(11), p < 0.001). At 6 months, QS and A2 decreased of 7 and 3 points, respectively, in relation with changes in ACQ-6 and Nijmegen scores as well as the HAD-A score for A2.

CONCLUSION

In breathless asthmatics, dyspnea is severe and worsened but differentially modulated by hyperventilation symptoms and anxiety. A multidimensional phenotyping of dyspnea in asthmatics could be useful to understand its origins and personalize treatment.

Cytokines as prognostic biomarkers in pulmonary arterial hypertension

BACKGROUND

Risk stratification and assessment of disease progression in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) are challenged by the lack of accurate disease-specific and prognostic biomarkers. To date, brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) and/or its N-terminal fragment (NT-proBNP) are the only markers for right ventricular dysfunction used in clinical practice, in association with echocardiographic and invasive haemodynamic variables to predict outcome in patients with PAH.

METHODS

This study was designed to identify an easily measurable biomarker panel in the serum of 80 well-phenotyped PAH patients with idiopathic, heritable or drug-induced PAH at baseline and at first follow-up. The prognostic value of identified cytokines of interest was secondly analysed in an external validation cohort of 125 PAH patients.

RESULTS

Among the 20 biomarkers studied with the multiplex Ella platform, we identified a three-biomarker panel composed of β-NGF, CXCL9 and TRAIL that were independently associated with prognosis both at the time of PAH diagnosis and at the first follow-up after initiation of PAH therapy. β-NGF and CXCL9 were predictors of death or transplantation, whereas high levels of TRAIL were associated with a better prognosis. Furthermore, the prognostic value of the three cytokines was more powerful for predicting survival than usual non-invasive variables (New York Heart Association Functional Class, 6-min walk distance and BNP/NT-proBNP). The results were validated in a fully independent external validation cohort.

CONCLUSION

The monitoring of β-NGF, CXCL9 and TRAIL levels in serum should be considered in the management and treatment of patients with PAH to objectively guide therapeutic options.

Functional respiratory complaints among COVID-19 survivors: a prospective cohort study

Background

Dyspnoea is a common persistent symptom after COVID-19. Whether it is associated with functional respiratory disorders remains unclear.

Methods

We assessed the proportion and characteristics of patients with “functional respiratory complaints” (FRCs) (as defined by Nijmegen Questionnaire>22) among 177 post-COVID-19 individuals who benefited from outclinic evaluation in the COMEBAC study (i.e., symptomatic and/or ICU survivors at 4 months). In a distinct explanatory cohort of 21 consecutive individuals with unexplained post-COVID-19 dyspnoea after routine tests, we also analysed the physiological responses to incremental cardio-pulmonary exercise testing (CPET).

Findings

In the COMEBAC cohort, 37 had significant FRCs (20.9%, IC95: 14.9–26.9). The prevalence of FRCs ranged from 7.2% (ICU patients) to 37.5% (non-ICU patients). The presence of FRCs was significantly associated with more severe dyspnoea, lower 6-minute walk distance, more frequent psychological and neurological symptoms (cognitive complaint, anxiety, depression, insomnia and post-traumatic stress disorders) and poorer quality of life (all p<0.01). In the explanatory cohort, 7/21 patients had significant FRCs. Based on CPET, dysfunctional breathing was identified in 12/21 patients, 5/21 had normal CPET, 3/21 had deconditioning and 1/21 had evidence of uncontrolled cardiovascular disease.

Interpretation

FRCs are common during post-COVID-19 follow-up, especially among patients with unexplained dyspnoea. Diagnosis of dysfunctional breathing should be considered in those cases.

Funding

Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris.

Long-term safety and efficacy of tezepelumab in people with severe, uncontrolled asthma (DESTINATION): a randomised, placebo-controlled extension study

BACKGROUND

Tezepelumab is a human monoclonal antibody that blocks thymic stromal lymphopoietin. The drug has been tested previously in the phase 3 NAVIGATOR (NCT03347279) and SOURCE (NCT03406078) studies, and was subsequently approved as a treatment for severe asthma. This extension study recruited from NAVIGATOR and SOURCE and aimed to evaluate the long-term safety and efficacy of tezepelumab in individuals with severe, uncontrolled asthma.

METHODS

DESTINATION was a phase 3, multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, long-term extension study. The study was done across 182 sites (including hospitals, clinics, medical centres, clinical trial centres, and private practices) in 18 countries. Participants (aged 12-80 years) were required to have good treatment compliance in the parent study. Randomisation was stratified by the parent study and all participants were re-randomised. Those who were previously randomised to receive tezepelumab in either parent study continued treatment of subcutaneous tezepelumab (210 mg every 4 weeks); those who were previously randomised to receive placebo in either parent study were re-randomised 1:1 to receive either subcutaneous tezepelumab (210 mg every 4 weeks) or placebo (every 4 weeks) using a randomisation list prepared by a computerised system. Total treatment duration (including the parent studies) was 104 weeks for all groups. Participants, investigators, and site staff were masked to treatment assignment. The primary endpoints were exposure-adjusted incidence of adverse events and serious adverse events and the secondary endpoint was the annualised asthma exacerbation rate; these were assessed from week 0 of the parent studies to week 104 of DESTINATION in all participants who were randomised and who received at least one dose of tezepelumab or placebo in either of the parent studies. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03706079, and is closed to new participants.

FINDINGS

Participants were recruited between Jan 7, 2019, and Oct 15, 2020. For individuals who initially received tezepelumab (n=528) in NAVIGATOR, incidence of adverse events over 104 weeks was 49·62 (95% CI 45·16 to 54·39) per 100 patient-years, compared with 62·66 (56·93 to 68·81) for those receiving placebo (n=531; difference -13·04, 95% CI -17·83 to -8·18). For serious adverse events, incidence was 7·85 (6·14 to 9·89) per 100 patient-years for individuals who initially received tezepelumab and 12·45 (9·97 to 15·35) for those who received placebo (difference -4·59, -7·69 to -1·65). In SOURCE, incidence of adverse events was 47·15 (36·06 to 60·56) per 100 patient-years for those who initially received tezepelumab (n=74) and 69·97 (54·54 to 88·40) for those who received placebo (n=76; difference -22·82, -34·77 to -10·01). For serious adverse events, incidence was 13·14 (7·65 to 21·04) per 100 patient-years for those who initially received tezepelumab and 17·99 (10·66 to 28·44) for those who received placebo (difference -4·85, -14·88 to 4·53). Tezepelumab reduced the annualised asthma exacerbation rate over 104 weeks compared with placebo. In participants initially from NAVIGATOR, the annualised asthma exacerbation rate ratio over 104 weeks was 0·42 (95% CI 0·35 to 0·51); in those initially from SOURCE, the ratio over 104 weeks was 0·61 (0·38 to 0·96).

INTERPRETATION

Tezepelumab treatment was well tolerated for up to 2 years and resulted in sustained, clinically meaningful reductions in asthma exacerbations in individuals with severe, uncontrolled asthma. These findings are consistent with previous randomised, placebo-controlled studies and show the long-term safety and sustained efficacy of tezepelumab in individuals with severe, uncontrolled asthma.

FUNDING

AstraZeneca and Amgen.

Improvement in severe asthma patients receiving biologics and factors associated with persistent insufficient control: a real-life national study

BACKGROUND

Biological therapies have revolutionized the treatment of severe asthma with type 2 inflammation. Although such treatments are very effective in reducing exacerbation and the dose of oral steroids, little is known about the persistence of symptoms in severe asthma patients treated with biologics.

PURPOSE

We aim to describe asthma control and healthcare consumption of severe asthma patients treated with biologics.

DESIGN

The Second Souffle study is a real-life prospective observational study endorsed by the Clinical Research Initiative in Severe Asthma: a Lever for Innovation & Science Network.

METHODS

Adults with a confirmed diagnosis of severe asthma for at least 12 months' duration were enrolled in the study. A self-administered questionnaire including the Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ), Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ) and a compliance evaluation test was given to the patients. Healthcare consumption within 12 months prior to enrolment was documented. In patients receiving biologics, doctors indicated whether the patients were biologic responders or non-responders.

RESULTS

The characteristics of 431 patients with severe asthma were analysed. Among them, 409 patients (94.9%) presented asthma with type 2 inflammation (T2 high) profile, and 297 (72.6%) patients with a T2 high phenotype were treated with a biologic. Physicians estimated that 88.2% of patients receiving biologics were responders. However, asthma control was only achieved in 25.3% of those patients (ACQ > 0.75). A high proportion of patients (77.8%) identified as responders to biologics were not controlled according to the ACQ score. About 50% of patients continue to use oral corticosteroids either daily (25.2%) or more than three times a year for at least three consecutive days (25.6%). Gastro-oesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD) and Obstructive Sleep Apnoea syndrome (OSA) were identified as independent factors associated with uncontrolled asthma.

CONCLUSION

Although a high proportion of severe asthma patients respond to biologics, only 25.3% have controlled asthma. GERD and OSA are independent factors of uncontrolled asthma.

Characteristics and outcomes of asthmatic outpatients with COVID-19 who receive home telesurveillance

Background

The prognosis of asthmatic outpatients with COVID-19 needs to be clarified. The objectives of this study were: 1) to investigate the characteristics and outcomes of asthmatic patients receiving initial ambulatory care and home monitoring for COVID-19 with Covidom, a telesurveillance solution; and 2) to compare the characteristics and outcomes between asthmatic and non-asthmatic patients.

Methods

Inclusion criteria were age ≥18 years, suspected or confirmed COVID-19 diagnosis allowing initial ambulatory care, registration in Covidom between March 2020 and April 2021 and completion of the initial medical questionnaire. We compared clinical characteristics and outcomes between asthmatic and non-asthmatic patients, and we evaluated whether asthma was independently associated with clinical worsening (hospitalisation or death) within 30 days follow-up using a multivariate logistic regression model.

Results

33 815 patients met the inclusion criteria. Asthma was reported in 4276 (12.6%). The main comorbidities among asthmatic patients were obesity (23.1%), hypertension (12.7%) and diabetes (4.5%). As compared with non-asthmatic patients, asthmatic patients were more often female (70.0 versus 62.1%, p<0.001), of younger age (42.2 versus 43.8 years, p<0.001) and obese (23.1 versus 17.6%, p<0.001). The rate of hospitalisation did not differ significantly (4.7 versus 4.2%, p=0.203) and no asthmatic patient died during follow-up (versus 25 non-asthmatic patients, 0.1%; p=0.109). In multivariate analysis, asthma was independently associated with higher risk of clinical worsening (OR 1.23, 95% CI 1.04–1.44, p=0.013).

Conclusion

In a large French cohort of patients receiving initial ambulatory care and home monitoring for COVID-19, asthma was independently associated with higher risk of clinical worsening although no asthmatic patient died within the 30 days follow-up.

Asthma appears independently associated with clinical worsening in outpatients receiving ambulatory care for #COVID19 using the Covidom telesurveillance solution for home monitoring but no death was reported among asthmaticshttps://bit.ly/3vMTzpZ

COVID-19 in Patients with Pulmonary Hypertension: A National Prospective Cohort Study

Rationale: Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection is associated with pulmonary endothelial dysfunction. There are limited data available on the outcomes of coronavirus disease (COVID-19) in patients with pulmonary hypertension (PH), a disease characterized by pulmonary endothelial dysfunction. Objectives: To describe characteristics and outcomes of patients with precapillary PH and COVID-19. Methods: We prospectively collected characteristics, management, and outcomes of adult patients with precapillary PH in the French PH network who had COVID-19 between February 1, 2020, and April 30, 2021. Clinical, functional, and hemodynamic characteristics of PH before COVID-19 were collected from the French PH registry. Measurements and Main Results: A total of 211 patients with PH (including 123 with pulmonary arterial hypertension, 47 with chronic thromboembolic PH, and 41 with other types of PH) experienced COVID-19, and 40.3% of them were outpatients, 32.2% were hospitalized in a conventional ward, and 27.5% were in an ICU. Among hospitalized patients (n = 126), 54.0% received corticosteroids, 37.3% high-flow oxygen, and 11.1% invasive ventilation. Right ventricular and acute renal failure occurred in 30.2% and 19.8% of patients, respectively. Fifty-two patients (all hospitalized) died from COVID-19. Overall mortality was 24.6% (95% CI [confidence interval], 18.8-30.5) and in-hospital mortality 41.3% (95% CI, 32.7-49.9). Nonsurvivors were significantly older, more frequently male and suffering comorbidities (diabetes, chronic respiratory diseases, systemic hypertension, chronic cardiac diseases, and/or chronic renal failure), and had more severe PH at their most recent evaluation preceding COVID-19 diagnosis (in terms of functional class and 6-minute-walk distance; all P < 0.05). Use of pulmonary arterial hypertension therapy was similar between survivors and nonsurvivors. Conclusions: COVID-19 in patients with precapillary PH was associated with a high in-hospital mortality. The typical risk factors for severe COVID-19 and severity of PH were associated with mortality in this population.

Post-acute COVID-19 syndrome

Infection with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is responsible for the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic that has resulted in millions of deaths and a major strain on health systems worldwide. Medical treatments for COVID-19 (anticoagulants, corticosteroids, anti-inflammatory drugs, oxygenation therapy and ventilation) and vaccination have improved patient outcomes. The majority of patients will recover spontaneously or after acute-phase management, but clinicians are now faced with long-term complications of COVID-19 including a large variety of symptoms, defined as "post-acute COVID-19 syndrome". Most studies have focused on patients hospitalised for severe COVID-19, but acute COVID-19 syndrome is not restricted to these patients and exists in outpatients. Given the diversity of symptoms and the high prevalence of persistent symptoms, the management of these patients requires a multidisciplinary team approach, which will result in the consumption of large amounts of health resources in the coming months. In this review, we discuss the presentation, prevalence, pathophysiology and evolution of respiratory complications and other organ-related injuries associated with post-acute COVID-19 syndrome.

Pulsatile pulmonary artery pressure in a large animal model of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension: Similarities and differences with human data

A striking feature of the human pulmonary circulation is that mean (mPAP) and systolic (sPAP) pulmonary artery pressures (PAPs) are strongly related and, thus, are essentially redundant. According to the empirical formula documented under normotensive and hypertensive conditions (mPAP = 0.61 sPAP + 2 mmHg), sPAP matches ~160%mPAP on average. This attests to the high pulsatility of PAP, as also witnessed by the near equality of PA pulse pressure and mPAP. Our prospective study tested if pressure redundancy and high pulsatility also apply in a piglet model of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH). At baseline (Week‐0, W0), Sham (n = 8) and CTEPH (n = 27) had similar mPAP and stroke volume. At W6, mPAP increased in CTEPH only, with a two‐ to three‐fold increase in PA stiffness and total pulmonary resistance. Seven CTEPH piglets were also studied at W16 at baseline, after volume loading, and after acute pulmonary embolism associated with dobutamine infusion. There was a strong linear relationship between sPAP and mPAP (1) at W0 and W6 (n = 70 data points, r² = 0.95); (2) in the subgroup studied at W16 (n = 21, r² = 0.97); and (3) when all data were pooled (n = 91, r² = 0.97, sPAP range 9–112 mmHg). The PA pulsatility was lower than that expected based on observations in humans: sPAP matched ~120%mPAP only and PA pulse pressure was markedly lower than mPAP. In conclusion, the redundancy between mPAP and sPAP seems a characteristic of the pulmonary circulation independent of the species. However, it is suggested that the sPAP thresholds used to define PH in animals are species‐ and/or model‐dependent and thus must be validated.

Asthma and COVID-19: an update

As the world faces the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic due to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection, concerns have been raised that asthma patients could be at increased risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection and disease severity. However, it appears that asthma is not an independent risk factor for both. Furthermore, asthma is not over-represented in hospitalised patients with severe pneumonia due to SARS-CoV-2 infection and there was no increased risk of asthma exacerbations triggered by SARS-CoV-2. There is accumulating evidence that asthma phenotypes and comorbidities are important factors in evaluating the risk for SARS-CoV-2 infection and disease severity, as findings suggest that Th2-high inflammation may reduce the risk of SARS-Cov-2 infection and disease severity in contrast to increased risk in patients with Th2-low asthma. The use of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) is safe in asthma patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection. Furthermore, it has been proposed that ICS may confer some degree of protection against SARS-CoV-2 infection and the development of severe disease by reducing the expression of angiotensin converting enzyme-2 and transmembrane protease serine in the lung. In contrast, chronic or recurrent use of systemic corticosteroids before SARS-CoV-2 infection is a major risk factor of poor outcomes and worst survival in asthma patients. Conversely, biological therapy for severe allergic and eosinophilic asthma does not increase the risk of being infected with SARS-CoV-2 or having worse COVID-19 severity. In the present review we will summarise the current literature regarding asthma and COVID-19.

Chronic or recurrent use of systemic corticosteroids before SARS-CoV-2 infection is a major risk factor of worst COVID-19 severity and survival in asthmatics as opposed to ICS and biological therapy which seems to be safe.https://bit.ly/3jU0zLR

Respiratory symptoms and radiologic findings in post-acute COVID-19 syndrome

Rationale

The characteristics of patients with respiratory complaints and/or lung radiologic abnormalities after hospitalisation for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) are unknown. The objectives were to determine their characteristics and the relationships between dyspnoea, radiologic abnormalities and functional impairment.

Methods

In the COMEBAC (Consultation Multi-Expertise de Bicêtre Après COVID-19) cohort study, 478 hospital survivors were evaluated by telephone 4 months after hospital discharge, and 177 who had been hospitalised in an intensive care unit (ICU) or presented relevant symptoms underwent an ambulatory evaluation. New-onset dyspnoea and cough were evaluated, and the results of pulmonary function tests and high-resolution computed tomography of the chest were collected.

Results

Among the 478 patients, 78 (16.3%) reported new-onset dyspnoea, and 23 (4.8%) new-onset cough. The patients with new-onset dyspnoea were younger (56.1±12.3 versus 61.9±16.6 years), had more severe COVID-19 (ICU admission 56.4% versus 24.5%) and more frequent pulmonary embolism (18.0% versus 6.8%) (all p≤0.001) than patients without dyspnoea. Among the patients reassessed at the ambulatory care visit, the prevalence of fibrotic lung lesions was 19.3%, with extent <25% in 97% of the patients. The patients with fibrotic lesions were older (61±11 versus 56±14 years, p=0.03), more frequently managed in an ICU (87.9 versus 47.4%, p<0.001), had lower total lung capacity (74.1±13.7 versus 84.9±14.8% pred, p<0.001) and diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (D_LCO) (73.3±17.9 versus 89.7±22.8% pred, p<0.001). The combination of new-onset dyspnoea, fibrotic lesions and D_LCO <70% pred was observed in eight out of 478 patients.

Conclusions

New-onset dyspnoea and mild fibrotic lesions were frequent at 4 months, but the association of new-onset dyspnoea, fibrotic lesions and low D_LCO was rare.

New-onset dyspnoea is a frequent complaint 4 months after #COVID19 and is generally multifactorial, and the combination of new-onset dyspnoea, fibrotic lesions and D_LCO <70% pred is rarely observedhttps://bit.ly/3q4hyyM

External validation of a refined 4-strata risk assessment score from the French pulmonary hypertension Registry

Introduction

Contemporary risk assessment tools categorise patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) as low, intermediate or high risk. A minority of patients achieve low risk status with most remaining intermediate risk. Our aim was to validate a four-stratum risk assessment approach categorising patients as low, intermediate-low, intermediate-high or high risk, as proposed by the Comparative, Prospective Registry of Newly Initiated Therapies for Pulmonary Hypertension (COMPERA) investigators.

Methods

We evaluated incident patients from the French PAH Registry and applied a four-stratum risk method at baseline and at first reassessment. We applied refined cut-points for three variables: World Health Organization functional class, 6-min walk distance and N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide. We used Kaplan–Meier survival analyses and Cox proportional hazards regression to assess survival according to three-stratum and four-stratum risk approaches.

Results

At baseline (n=2879), the four-stratum approach identified four distinct risk groups and performed slightly better than a three-stratum method for predicting mortality. Four-stratum model discrimination was significantly higher than the three-stratum method when applied during follow-up and refined risk categories among subgroups with idiopathic PAH, connective tissue disease-associated PAH, congenital heart disease and portopulmonary hypertension. Using the four-stratum approach, 53% of patients changed risk category from baseline compared to 39% of patients when applying the three-stratum approach. Those who achieved or maintained a low risk status had the best survival, whereas there were more nuanced differences in survival for patients who were intermediate-low and intermediate-high risk.

Conclusions

The four-stratum risk assessment method refined risk prediction, especially within the intermediate risk category of patients, performed better at predicting survival and was more sensitive to change than the three-stratum approach.

A four-stratum risk assessment method with low, intermediate-low, intermediate-high and high risk categories was better at discriminating survival in pulmonary arterial hypertension than a three-stratum method with low, intermediate and high risk groupshttps://bit.ly/3mA6kj7

Screening for pulmonary arterial hypertension in adults carrying a BMPR2 mutation

Background

Heritable pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is most commonly due to heterozygous mutations of the BMPR2 gene. Based on expert consensus, guidelines recommend annual screening echocardiography in asymptomatic BMPR2 mutation carriers. The main objectives of this study were to evaluate the characteristics of asymptomatic BMPR2 mutation carriers, assess their risk of occurrence of PAH and detect PAH at an early stage in this high-risk population.

Methods

Asymptomatic BMPR2 mutation carriers underwent screening at baseline and annually for a minimum of 2 years (DELPHI-2 study; ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01600898). Annual screening included clinical assessment, ECG, pulmonary function tests, 6-min walk distance, cardiopulmonary exercise testing, chest radiography, echocardiography and brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) or N-terminal (NT)-proBNP level. Right heart catheterisation (RHC) was performed based on predefined criteria. An optional RHC at rest and exercise was proposed at baseline.

Results

55 subjects (26 males; median age 37 years) were included. At baseline, no PAH was suspected based on echocardiography and NT-proBNP levels. All subjects accepted RHC at inclusion, which identified two mild PAH cases (3.6%) and 12 subjects with exercise pulmonary hypertension (21.8%). At long-term follow-up (118.8 patient-years of follow-up), three additional cases were diagnosed, yielding a PAH incidence of 2.3% per year (0.99% per year in males and 3.5% per year in females). All PAH cases remained at low-risk status on oral therapy at last follow-up.

Conclusions

Asymptomatic BMPR2 mutation carriers have a significant risk of developing incident PAH. International multicentre studies are needed to confirm that refined multimodal screening programmes with regular follow-up allow early detection of PAH.

Asymptomatic BMPR2 mutation carriers have a 2.3% per year risk of developing PAH. DELPHI-2 provides the platform for future international multicentre studies to refine multimodal screening algorithms in BMPR2 mutation carriers.http://bit.ly/3oi2KJ1

Prevalence of pulmonary embolism in patients with COVID-19 at the time of hospital admission

A high prevalence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) has been reported during intensive care unit (ICU) hospitalisation in patients with severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) [1, 2]. In most cases, the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism (PE) was incidental as patients underwent computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA) for aggravation of their respiratory condition. Higher mortality is also described in patients with high D-dimer levels suggesting that VTE complication may contribute to unfavourable prognosis [3, 4]. Even though, prevalence of thromboembolic complications during ICU hospitalisation seems to be high, the prevalence of pulmonary embolism at hospital admission for COVID-19 is unknown and may be underestimated.

There is a high prevalence of pulmonary embolism in patients with COVID-19 at the time of hospital admissionhttps://bit.ly/3reaLjv

Multidisciplinary approach for post-acute COVID-19 syndrome: time to break down the walls

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has provoked an ongoing global pandemic of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), which has affected 130 million people worldwide and caused nearly 3 million deaths in just over 1 year [1]. In 2020, COVID-19 represented the third highest cause of death in the USA after heart disease and cancer [2], and this outbreak has led to the largest drop in life expectancy since World War II [2]. Evidence-based medical treatment of COVID-19 (anticoagulants, corticosteroids, anti-inflammatory drugs, oxygenation therapy and ventilation) [3] seems to have improved patients’ outcomes, and the vast majority will recover spontaneously or after acute phase management.

The importance of the COVID-19 pandemic requires us to break down the walls between medical specialties to optimise the management of patients with post-acute COVID-19 syndromehttps://bit.ly/3gzqEik

The association between sleep-related breathing disorders and pre-capillary pulmonary hypertension: A chicken and egg question

The level of knowledge about a direct link between sleep-related breathing disorders and pre-capillary pulmonary hypertension (PH) is low and there is a chicken and egg question to know which disease causes the other. On one hand, sleep-related breathing disorders are considered as a cause of group 3 PH, in the subgroup of patients with hypoxemia without lung disease. Indeed, isolated sleep-related breathing disorders can lead to mild pre-capillary PH on their own, although this is rare for obstructive sleep apnea and difficult to establish for obesity-hypoventilation syndrome, the evolution towards PH being observed especially in the presence of respiratory comorbidities. The hemodynamic improvement under treatment with continuous positive airway pressure or non-invasive ventilation also argues for a causal link between pre-capillary PH and sleep-related breathing disorders. On the other hand, patients followed for pre-capillary PH, particularly pulmonary arterial hypertension and chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension, develop more sleep-related breathing disorders than the general population, especially sleep hypoxemia, central sleep apnea in patients with severe PH and obstructive sleep apnea in older patients with higher body mass index. The main objective of this article is therefore to answer two main questions, which will then lead us to discuss the bilateral link between these diseases: are sleep-related breathing disorders independent risk factors for pre-capillary PH and does pre-capillary PH induce sleep-related breathing disorders? In other words, who is the chicken and who is the egg?

The isobaric pulmonary arterial compliance in pulmonary hypertension

Pulmonary hypertension is associated with stiffening of pulmonary arteries which increases right ventricular pulsatile loading. High pulmonary artery wedge pressure (PAWP) in postcapillary pulmonary hypertension (Pc-PH) further decreases pulmonary arterial compliance (PAC) at a given pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) compared with precapillary pulmonary hypertension, thus responsible for a higher total arterial load. In all other vascular beds, arterial compliance is considered as mainly determined by the distending pressure, due to non-linear stress-strain behaviour of arteries. We tested the applicability, advantages and drawbacks of two comparison methods of PAC depending on the level of mean pulmonary arterial pressure (mPAP; isobaric PAC) or PVR.

Right heart catheterisation data including PAC (stroke volume/pulse pressure) were obtained in 112 Pc-PH (of whom 61 had combined postcapillary and precapillary pulmonary hypertension) and 719 idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension (iPAH).

PAC could be compared over the same mPAP range (25–66 mmHg) in 792 (95.3%) out of 831 patients and over the same PVR range (3–10.7 WU) in only 520 (62.6%) out of 831 patients. The main assumption underlying comparisons at a given PVR was not verified as the PVR×PAC product (RC-time) was not constant but on the contrary more variable than mPAP. In the 788/831 (94.8%) patients studied over the same PAC range (0.62–6.5 mL·mmHg⁻¹), PVR and thus total arterial load tended to be higher in iPAH.

Our study favours comparing PAC at fixed mPAP level (isobaric PAC) rather than at fixed PVR. A reappraisal of the effects of PAWP on the pulsatile and total arterial load put on the right heart is needed, and this point deserves further studies.

In postcapillary and precapillary pulmonary hypertension patients, this study favours comparing pulmonary arterial compliance (PAC) at fixed mean pulmonary artery pressure level (isobaric PAC) rather than at fixed pulmonary vascular resistance levelhttps://bit.ly/3aTLYdS

Four-Month Clinical Status of a Cohort of Patients After Hospitalization for COVID-19

IMPORTANCE

Little is known about long-term sequelae of COVID-19.

OBJECTIVE

To describe the consequences at 4 months in patients hospitalized for COVID-19.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

In a prospective uncontrolled cohort study, survivors of COVID-19 who had been hospitalized in a university hospital in France between March 1 and May 29, 2020, underwent a telephone assessment 4 months after discharge, between July 15 and September 18, 2020. Patients with relevant symptoms and all patients hospitalized in an intensive care unit (ICU) were invited for further assessment at an ambulatory care visit.

EXPOSURES

Survival of hospitalization for COVID-19.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Respiratory, cognitive, and functional symptoms were assessed by telephone with the Q3PC cognitive screening questionnaire and a checklist of symptoms. At the ambulatory care visit, patients underwent pulmonary function tests, lung computed tomographic scan, psychometric and cognitive tests (including the 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey and 20-item Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory), and, for patients who had been hospitalized in the ICU or reported ongoing symptoms, echocardiography.

RESULTS

Among 834 eligible patients, 478 were evaluated by telephone (mean age, 61 years [SD, 16 years]; 201 men, 277 women). During the telephone interview, 244 patients (51%) declared at least 1 symptom that did not exist before COVID-19: fatigue in 31%, cognitive symptoms in 21%, and new-onset dyspnea in 16%. There was further evaluation in 177 patients (37%), including 97 of 142 former ICU patients. The median 20-item Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory score (n = 130) was 4.5 (interquartile range, 3.0-5.0) for reduced motivation and 3.7 (interquartile range, 3.0-4.5) for mental fatigue (possible range, 1 [best] to 5 [worst]). The median 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey score (n = 145) was 25 (interquartile range, 25.0-75.0) for the subscale "role limited owing to physical problems" (possible range, 0 [best] to 100 [worst]). Computed tomographic lung-scan abnormalities were found in 108 of 171 patients (63%), mainly subtle ground-glass opacities. Fibrotic lesions were observed in 33 of 171 patients (19%), involving less than 25% of parenchyma in all but 1 patient. Fibrotic lesions were observed in 19 of 49 survivors (39%) with acute respiratory distress syndrome. Among 94 former ICU patients, anxiety, depression, and posttraumatic symptoms were observed in 23%, 18%, and 7%, respectively. The left ventricular ejection fraction was less than 50% in 8 of 83 ICU patients (10%). New-onset chronic kidney disease was observed in 2 ICU patients. Serology was positive in 172 of 177 outpatients (97%).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Four months after hospitalization for COVID-19, a cohort of patients frequently reported symptoms not previously present, and lung-scan abnormalities were common among those who were tested. These findings are limited by the absence of a control group and of pre-COVID assessments in this cohort. Further research is needed to understand longer-term outcomes and whether these findings reflect associations with the disease.

Outcomes of patients with decreased arterial oxyhaemoglobin saturation on pulmonary arterial hypertension drugs

RATIONALE

Drugs approved for the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) improve long-term outcomes. These drugs have pulmonary vasodilator properties which may potentially cause a decrease in arterial oxyhaemoglobin saturation (SaO₂) in some patients.

OBJECTIVES

The present retrospective study of the French PAH Registry aimed to describe clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients showing a ≥3% decrease in SaO₂ while treated with PAH drugs.

METHODS

We reviewed 719 PAH patients. The exclusion criteria were PAH associated with congenital heart disease and PAH with overt features of venous/capillaries involvement.

MAIN RESULTS

One hundred and seventy-three (24%) patients had a ≥3% decrease in SaO₂. At diagnosis, they were older, with a lower diffusion capacity for carbon monoxide and a shorter 6-minute walk distance, when compared to those who did not display a ≥3% decrease in SaO₂. The percentage of patients meeting the ESC/ERS low risk criteria at re-evaluation was significantly lower in those with a ≥3% decrease in SaO₂ and more patients started long-term oxygen therapy in this group (16% versus 5%, p<0.001). A≥3% decrease in SaO₂ was associated with a poorer survival (Hazard Ratio 1.81:95% confidence interval 1.43-2.34; p<0.0001). In a multivariate Cox analysis, a ≥3% decrease in SaO₂ was a prognostic factor independent of age at diagnosis and ESC/ERS risk stratification at follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

When treated with PAH drugs, a large subset of patients experience a≥3% decrease in SaO₂, which is associated with worst long-term outcomes and reduced survival.

Characteristics and outcomes of asthmatic patients with COVID-19 pneumonia who require hospitalisation

Background

Viral respiratory infections are the main causes of asthma exacerbation. The susceptibility of patients with asthma to develop an exacerbation when they present with severe pneumonia due to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection is unknown. The objective of this study was to investigate the characteristics and outcomes of asthmatic patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pneumonia who required hospitalisation during the spring 2020 outbreak in Paris, France.

Methods

A prospective cohort follow-up was carried out from 15 March to 15 April 2020 in Bicêtre Hospital, University Paris-Saclay, France. All hospitalised patients with a SARS-CoV-2 infection who reported a history of asthma were included.

Results

Among 768 hospitalised patients, 37 (4.8%) reported a history of asthma, which had been previously confirmed by a pulmonologist in 85% of cases. These asthmatic patients were mainly female (70%) and nonsmokers (85%), with a median age of 54 years (interquartile range (IQR) 42–67 years). None of them presented with an asthma exacerbation. 22 (59%) had major comorbidities and 31 (84%) had a body mass index ≥25 kg·m⁻². The most common comorbidities were obesity (36%), hypertension (27%) and diabetes (19%). All patients had a confirmed diagnosis of COVID-19 pneumonia on computed tomography of the chest. Eosinopenia was a typical biological feature with a median count of 0 cells·mm⁻³ (IQR 0–0 cells·mm⁻³). 11 patients (30%) were admitted into the intensive care unit, with three deaths (8.1%) occurring in the context of comorbidities.

Conclusion

Asthma patients were not overrepresented among those with severe pneumonia due to SARS-CoV-2 infection who required hospitalisation. The worst outcomes were observed mainly in patients with major comorbidities.

Asthmatic patients were not overrepresented among those with severe pneumonia due to SARS-CoV-2 infection who required hospitalisation. None presented with an asthma exacerbation. Worst outcomes were observed mainly in patients with major comorbidities.https://bit.ly/303djG6

[Dyspnoea in asthma: diagnostic approach]

Dyspnoea is a cardinal symptom of asthma and an essential part of assessing control of the disease. Its intensity is variable for the same level of bronchial obstruction, which suggests the involvement of other mechanisms. Therefore, it is extremely important to characterize and measure dyspnoea in asthmatic patients because its profile can be quantitatively and qualitatively modified by disease control, comorbidities and anxiety. Hence the value of using additional tools to ACT and ACQ because the latter do not characterize nor measure specifically dyspnoea in asthma. Different tools can be used in this regard, at rest as the subjective assessment of dyspnoea by scales such as the modified Medical Research Council (mMRC), the New York Heart Association (NYHA) and the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) or more recently using the Dyspnea-12 and the Multidimensional Dyspnea Profile (MDP) questionnaire, which assesses the sensory and affective dimensions of dyspnoea; and during exercise testing such as the "modified" Borg scale, graduated from 0 to 10, or the VAS. Among the factors contributing to dyspnoea in asthmatic patients, probably bronchial obstruction, increased airway resistance and dynamic hyperinflation play an important role. Despite this, the asthmatic patient's description of dyspnoea may be masked by hyperventilation syndrome or other comorbidities that can easily be detected and treated through educational programs and targeted therapies.