Commutability and concordance of four hepatitis B virus DNA assays in an international multicenter study

Alinity m, a Random-Access System, for Hepatitis B Virus DNA Quantification in Plasma and Whole Blood Collected on Dried Blood Spots

The International Liver Association recommends the use of accurate and sensitive molecular methods for determination of hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA levels in plasma or serum of chronic HBsAg carriers. The level of HBV replication represents the strongest predictive biomarker associated with disease progression and long-term outcome of chronic HBV infection. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the ability to the new Alinity m System to detect and quantify HBV DNA in plasma and whole blood collected on dried blood spots (DBS). Paired plasma and DBS samples from patients chronically infected with various HBV genotypes were tested in parallel for HBV DNA detection and quantification. There is a linear relationship between HBV DNA levels measured in plasma samples using the Alinity m HBV assay and the Xpert HBV viral load assay, used for comparison. A slight deviation (0.03 ± 0.31 log IU/mL) was observed within the quantitative range. In DBS, HBV DNA levels closely correlated with levels measured in plasma. All patients had detectable and quantifiable HBV DNA by DBS testing, except for one patient with a plasma HBV DNA level above 2,000 IU/mL. In conclusion, the newly developed real-time PCR-based assay Alinity m HBV assay can correctly detect HBV DNA in DBS, especially for patients with blood HBV DNA levels above 2,000 IU/mL, and also accurately quantify HBV DNA in plasma samples.

IMPORTANCE Hepatitis B virus is one of the most prevalent blood-borne viruses affecting the liver and causing acute and chronic hepatitis. Only a small proportion of people with HBV infection are diagnosed. HBV DNA measurement is critical in clinical practice for the diagnosis and treatment decisions of patients requiring antiviral therapy. Dried blood spot (DBS) collection provides a simple, practical, and acceptable alternative to venous blood collection, especially in community settings. We have demonstrated high sensitivity and specificity for HBV DNA detection in DBS compared to plasma samples, especially when using clinically relevant cutoffs of 2,000 and 20,000 IU/mL. Results support the use of DBS in community-based settings.

Diagnosis and Monitoring of Hepatitis B Virus Infection Using the Cobas® HBV Test for Use on the Cobas® 4800 System

(1) Background: Sensitive and accurate nucleic acid amplification technologies are now recommended for hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA detection and quantification in clinical practice to diagnose and monitor hepatitis B infection. The aim of this study was to assess the analytical and clinical performance of the cobas^® HBV Test on the cobas^® 4800 System. (2) Methods: Standard panel and clinical specimens were tested in parallel with three different real-time commercial PCR assays including the cobas ^® HBV Test, the Cobas^® AmpliPrep/Cobas^® TaqMan HBV Test v2.0 and Alinity™ m HBV assay. (3) Results: The specificity of the cobas^® HBV Test was 97.9%. The limit of detection was estimated to be 2.1 IU/mL. Intra-assay and interassay coefficients of variation varied from 0.14% to 1.92% and 2.16% to 12.02%, respectively. HBV DNA levels in patients infected with different HBV genotypes strongly correlated with those measured by the two other commercial comparators assays. (4) Conclusions: The cobas^® HBV Test can be confidently used to detect and accurately quantify HBV DNA in clinical practice as well as in clinical trials with the new anti-HBV drugs currently in development.

HBV-RNA Co-amplification May Influence HBV DNA Viral Load Determination

Despite effective hepatitis B virus (HBV)-DNA suppression, HBV RNA can circulate in patients receiving nucleoside/nucleotide analogues (NAs). Current assays quantify HBV DNA by either real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR), which uses DNA polymerase, or transcription-mediated amplification, which uses reverse-transcriptase (RT) and RNA polymerase. We assessed the effect of RT capability on HBV-DNA quantification in samples from three cohorts, including patients with quantified HBV RNA. We compared the HBV-DNA levels by real-time PCR (cobas HBV, Roche 6800/8800; Xpert HBV, Cepheid), transcription-mediated amplification (Aptima HBV, Hologic), and real-time PCR with added RT capability (cobas HBV+RT). In the first cohort (n = 45) followed over 192 weeks of NA therapy, on-treatment HBV-DNA levels were higher with cobas HBV+RT than cobas HBV (mean difference: 0.14 log10 IU/mL). In a second cohort (n = 50) followed over 96 weeks of NA therapy, HBV-DNA viral load was significantly higher with the cobas HBV+RT and Aptima HBV compared with the cobas HBV test at all time points after initiation of NA therapy (mean difference: 0.65-1.16 log10 IU/mL). A clinically significant difference was not detected between the assays at baseline. In a third cohort (n = 53), after a median of 2.2 years of NA therapy, we detected HBV RNA (median 5.6 log10 copies/mL) in 23 patients (43.4%). Median HBV-DNA levels by Aptima HBV were 2.4 versus less than 1 log10 IU/mL in samples with HBV RNA and without HBV RNA, respectively (P = 0.0006). In treated patients with HBV RNA, Aptima HBV measured higher HBV-DNA levels than Xpert HBV and cobas HBV. Conclusion: Tests including an RT step may overestimate HBV DNA, particularly in samples with low viral loads as a result of NA therapy. This overestimation is likely due to amplification of HBV RNA and may have an impact on clinical decisions.

Generating timely molecular diagnostic test results: workflow comparison of the cobas® 6800/8800 to Panther

Background: Molecular diagnostic tests for HBV, HCV and HIV-1 and other pathogens are widely used for clinical management. Practical issues related to workflow and labor requirements need to be characterized to inform selection of the most appropriate system. Research design and methods: We compared the workflow of two high-throughput systems: cobas 6800 (Roche) and Panther (Hologic), using average mid-size laboratory test volumes for five different assays (HIV-1, HBV, HCV, HPV or TV, and CT/NG). Results: Set-up time, time to first results, time to last results, and total hands-on time for cobas 6800 was 0.40, 2.47, 7.12, and 0.98 hours, respectively; on the Panther system, these times were 0.75, 2.7, 9.1, and 1.48 hours. Fifty-seven samples had results available at the first time point on cobas 6800 compared to 5 samples on the Panther system. The Panther system required more manual steps including several with potential risks of contamination or error. The number of reagents items required was 5 for cobas 6800 and 40 for the Panther system. Conclusions: Both systems provided a high level of automation. The cobas 6800 platform had shorter start up, time to first result, time to last result and hands-on times than the Panther system.

Analytical performance of four molecular platforms used for HIV-1, HBV and HCV viral load determinations

Background: Viral load (VL) quantification is important for the management of HBV, HCV, and HIV-1-infected patients. Several semi- or fully automated systems and assays are available that can be used to measure VL for these and other targets. Research design and methods: We assessed the accuracy, genotype/subtype inclusivity, and precision of four VL assays for three viral targets: cobas 4800 (Roche), cobas 6800 (Roche), Aptima (Hologic) and VERIS (Beckman), using WHO standards, cell culture supernatants and clinical samples. Results: Most results were close to expected values, except for significant under-quantification of HIV-1 group O, HBV genotype C, and D at high VL, and HCV genotype 3 by Aptima, and of HIV-1 CRF01_AE and group N and HCV genotype 3 by VERIS. Precision was comparable between tests except for VERIS HCV, which showed more variability. Aptima and cobas 6800 results agreed well with each other except HBV VL at lower VL (<10,000 IU/mL) where Aptima results tended to be higher. Conclusions: Results from different VL assays may not always agree in certain subsets of patients. Clinicians should we aware of these findings when making treatment decisions.

Clinical evaluation of multiplex RT-PCR assays for the detection of influenza A/B and respiratory syncytial virus using a high throughput system

BACKGROUND

Lower respiratory tract infections are a major threat to public health systems worldwide, with RSV and influenza being the main agents causing hospitalization. In outbreak situations, high-volume respiratory testing is needed. In this study, we evaluated the analytical and clinical performance of a pre-designed primer/probe set for the simultaneous multiplex detection of both viruses on a high-throughput platform, the cobas^® 6800, using the "open channel" of the system for integration of lab-developed assays for the detection of influenza and RSV.

RESULTS

Using the influenza/RSV qPCR Assay with swabs, LoD (95%) in TCID50/mL for influenza-A was 0.009, influenza-B 0.003, RSV-A 0.202, and RSV-B 0.009. Inter-run variability (3xLoD) was low (<1 Ct for all targets). Of 371 clinical respiratory specimens analyzed, results were concordant for 358 samples. The calculated sensitivity and specificity of the assay were 98.3% and 98.4% for Flu-A, 100% and 98.5% for Flu-B, and 98.6% and 99.7% for RSV. All quality assessment panel specimens (N = 63, including avian influenza strains) were correctly identified. None of the tested microorganisms showed cross-reactivity.

CONCLUSION

Compared with CE-IVD assays, the assay evaluated here showed good analytical and clinical sensitivity and specificity with broad coverage of different virus strains. It offers high-throughput capacity with low hands-on time, facilitating the laboratory management of large respiratory outbreaks.

Analytical performance of the Hologic Aptima HBV Quant Assay and the COBAS Ampliprep/COBAS TaqMan HBV test v2.0 for the quantification of HBV DNA in plasma samples

BACKGROUND

Quantification of HBV DNA is used for initiating and monitoring antiviral treatment. Analytical test performance consequently impacts treatment decisions.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the analytical performance of the Aptima HBV Quant Assay (Aptima) and the COBAS Ampliprep/COBAS TaqMan HBV Test v2.0 (CAPCTMv2) for the quantification of HBV DNA in plasma samples.

STUDY DESIGN

The performance of the two tests was compared on 129 prospective plasma samples, and on 63 archived plasma samples of which 53 were genotyped. Linearity of the two assays was assessed on dilutions series of three clinical samples (Genotype B, C, and D).

RESULTS

Bland-Altman analysis of 120 clinical samples, which quantified in both tests, showed an average quantification bias (Aptima - CAPCTMv2) of -0.19 Log IU/mL (SD: 0.33 Log IU/mL). A single sample quantified more than three standard deviations higher in Aptima than in CAPCTMv2. Only minor differences were observed between genotype A (N = 4; average difference -0.01 Log IU/mL), B (N = 8; -0.13 Log IU/mL), C (N = 8; -0.31 Log IU/mL), D (N = 25; -0.22 Log IU/mL), and E (N = 7; -0.03 Log IU/mL). Deming regression showed that the two tests were excellently correlated (slope of the regression line 1.03; 95% CI: 0.998-1.068). Linearity of the tests was evaluated on dilution series and showed an excellent correlation of the two tests. Both tests were precise with %CV less than 3% for HBV DNA ≥3 Log IU/mL.

CONCLUSIONS

The Aptima and CAPCTMv2 tests are highly correlated, and both tests are useful for monitoring patients chronically infected with HBV.