Impact of an optimized colonoscopic screening program for patients with Lynch syndrome: 6-year results of a specialized French network

Colorectal cancer and advanced adenoma characteristics according to causative mismatch repair gene variant in Japanese colorectal surveillance for Lynch syndrome

BACKGROUND

The optimal interval of colonoscopy (CS) surveillance in cases with Lynch syndrome (LS), and stratification according to the causative mismatch repair gene mutation, has received much attention. To verify a feasible and effective CS surveillance strategy, we investigated the colorectal cancer (CRC) incidence at different intervals and the characteristics of precancerous colorectal lesions of LS cases.

METHODS

This retrospective multicenter study was conducted in Japan. CRCs and advanced adenomas (AAs) in 316 LS cases with germline pathogenic variants (path_) were analyzed according to the data of 1,756 registered CS.

RESULTS

The mean time interval for advanced CRCs (ACs) detected via CS surveillance was 28.7 months (95% confidence interval: 13.8-43.5). The rate of AC detection within (2.1%) and beyond 2 years (8.7%) differed significantly (p = 0.0003). AAs accounted for 43%, 46%, and 41% of lesions < 10 mm in size in the MLH1-, MSH2-, and MSH6-groups, respectively. The lifetime incidence of metachronous CRCs requiring intestinal resection for path_MLH1, path_MSH2, and path_MSH6 cases was 34%, 23%, and 14% in these cases, respectively. The cumulative CRC incidence showed a trend towards a 10-year delay for path_MSH6 cases as compared with that for path_MLH1 and path_MSH2 cases.

CONCLUSIONS

In cases with path_MLH1, path_MSH2, and path_MSH6, maintaining an appropriate CS surveillance interval of within 2 years is advisable to detect of the colorectal lesion amenable to endoscopic treatment. path_MSH6 cases could be stratified with path_MLH1 and MSH2 cases in terms of risk of metachronous CRC and age of onset.

Emerge of colorectal cancer in Lynch syndrome despite colonoscopy surveillance: A challenge of hide and seek

Even with colonoscopy surveillance, Lynch syndromes (LS) carriers still develop colorectal cancer (CRC). The cumulative incidence of CRCs under colonoscopy surveillance varies depending on the affected mismatch repair (MMR) gene. However, the precise mechanisms driving these epidemiological patterns remain incompletely understood. In recent years, several potential mechanisms explaining the occurrence of CRCs during colonoscopy surveillance have been proposed in individuals with and without LS. These encompass biological factors like concealed/accelerated carcinogenesis through a bypassed adenoma stage and accelerated progression from adenomas. Alongside these, various colonoscopy-related factors may contribute to formation of CRCs under colonoscopy surveillance, like missed yet detectable (pre)cancerous lesions, detected yet incompletely removed (pre)cancerous lesions, and colonoscopy-induced carcinogenesis due to tumor cell reimplantation. In this comprehensive literature update, we reviewed these potential factors and evaluated their relevance to each MMR group in an attempt to raise further awareness and stimulate research regarding this conflicting phenomenon.

Features of colorectal adenomas among young patients with Lynch syndrome according to path_MMR: Results from the PRED-IdF registry

BACKGROUND

Lynch syndrome (LS) is the most frequent inherited colorectal cancer syndrome.

AIM

To assess the burden of adenoma in LS patients under 50 years-old followed in the PRED-IdF network.

METHODS

From January 2010 to January 2019, all patients under 50 years of age with a confirmed LS germline mutation were included. The main objective was the description of adenomas characteristics according to path_MMR.

RESULTS

We analyzed data from 708 patients (mean age 34.8 ± 8.6), of which 41.8 % were male. Among these patients, 37.6% had path_MLH1, 45.4% path_MSH2, 13.9% path_MSH6, 2.9% path_PMS2, and 1.2% path_EpCAM. The analysis included 1721 (70.9%) follow-up colonoscopies. A total of 682 adenomas were detected, including 140 (20.5%) advanced adenomas. The adenoma detection rates during the first and follow-up colonoscopies were 19.2% and 20.5%, respectively. Most adenomas were <10 mm (57.9%), located in the proximal colon (334, 48.9%), and presented as non-polypoid lesions (493, 72.3%). The median growth time for adenomas was 23 months (range 9-114) irrespective of the path_MMR mutation (p = 0.62).

CONCLUSION

LS patients under 50 years of age have a high burden of adenomas, particularly small non-polypoid adenomas located in the proximal colon. These results highlight the need for intensive screening, with a particular focus on the proximal colon.

PMS2-associated Lynch syndrome: Past, present and future

Carriers of any pathogenic variant in one of the MMR genes (path_MMR carriers) were traditionally thought to be at comparable risk of developing a range of different malignancies, foremost colorectal cancer (CRC) and endometrial cancer. However, it is now widely accepted that their cancer risk and cancer spectrum range notably depending on which MMR gene is affected. Moreover, there is increasing evidence that the MMR gene affected also influences the molecular pathogenesis of Lynch syndrome CRC. Although substantial progress has been made over the past decade in understanding these differences, many questions remain unanswered, especially pertaining to path_PMS2 carriers. Recent findings show that, while the cancer risk is relatively low, PMS2-deficient CRCs tend to show more aggressive behaviour and have a worse prognosis than other MMR-deficient CRCs. This, together with lower intratumoral immune infiltration, suggests that PMS2-deficient CRCs might have more in common biologically with sporadic MMR-proficient CRCs than with other MMR-deficient CRCs. These findings could have important consequences for surveillance, chemoprevention and therapeutic strategies (e.g. vaccines). In this review we discuss the current knowledge, current (clinical) challenges and knowledge gaps that should be targeted by future studies.

Current guidelines in the surgical management of hereditary colorectal cancers

Incidence of colorectal cancer (CRC) is on rise. While approximately 70% of all CRC cases are sporadic in nature, 20%-25% have familial aggregation and only < 5% is hereditary in origin. Identification of individuals with hereditary predilection for CRC is critical, as it has an impact on their overall surgical management including surgical timing, approach & technique and determines the role of prophylactic surgery and outcome. This review highlights the concept of hereditary CRC, provides insight into its molecular basis, possibility of its application into clinical practice and emphasizes the current treatment strategies with surgical management, based on the available international guidelines.

Linked Colour imaging for the detection of polyps in patients with Lynch syndrome: a multicentre, parallel randomised controlled trial

OBJECTIVE

Despite regular colonoscopy surveillance, colorectal cancers still occur in patients with Lynch syndrome. Thus, detection of all relevant precancerous lesions remains very important. The present study investigates Linked Colour imaging (LCI), an image-enhancing technique, as compared with high-definition white light endoscopy (HD-WLE) for the detection of polyps in this patient group.

DESIGN

This prospective, randomised controlled trial was performed by 22 experienced endoscopists from eight centres in six countries. Consecutive Lynch syndrome patients ≥18 years undergoing surveillance colonoscopy were randomised (1:1) and stratified by centre for inspection with either LCI or HD-WLE. Primary outcome was the polyp detection rate (PDR).

RESULTS

Between January 2018 and March 2020, 357 patients were randomised and 332 patients analysed (160 LCI, 172 HD-WLE; 6 excluded due to incomplete colonoscopies and 19 due to insufficient bowel cleanliness). No significant difference was observed in PDR with LCI (44.4%; 95% CI 36.5% to 52.4%) compared with HD-WLE (36.0%; 95% CI 28.9% to 43.7%) (p=0.12). Of the secondary outcome parameters, more adenomas were found on a patient (adenoma detection rate 36.3%; vs 25.6%; p=0.04) and a colonoscopy basis (mean adenomas per colonoscopy 0.65 vs 0.42; p=0.04). The median withdrawal time was not statistically different between LCI and HD-WLE (12 vs 11 min; p=0.16).

CONCLUSION

LCI did not improve the PDR compared with HD-WLE in patients with Lynch syndrome undergoing surveillance. The relevance of findings more adenomas by LCI has to be examined further.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT03344289.

Quality of Colonoscopy Is Associated With Adenoma Detection and Postcolonoscopy Colorectal Cancer Prevention in Lynch Syndrome

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Colonoscopy reduces colorectal cancer (CRC) incidence and mortality in Lynch syndrome (LS) carriers. However, a high incidence of postcolonoscopy CRC (PCCRC) has been reported. Colonoscopy is highly dependent on endoscopist skill and is subject to quality variability. We aimed to evaluate the impact of key colonoscopy quality indicators on adenoma detection and prevention of PCCRC in LS.

METHODS

We conducted a multicenter study focused on LS carriers without previous CRC undergoing colonoscopy surveillance (n = 893). Incident colorectal neoplasia during surveillance and quality indicators of all colonoscopies were analyzed. We performed an emulated target trial comparing the results from the first and second surveillance colonoscopies to assess the effect of colonoscopy quality indicators on adenoma detection and PCCRC incidence. Risk analyses were conducted using a multivariable logistic regression model.

RESULTS

The 10-year cumulative incidence of adenoma and PCCRC was 60.6% (95% CI, 55.5%-65.2%) and 7.9% (95% CI, 5.2%-10.6%), respectively. Adequate bowel preparation (odds ratio [OR], 2.07; 95% CI, 1.06-4.3), complete colonoscopies (20% vs 0%; P = .01), and pan-chromoendoscopy use (OR, 2.14; 95% CI, 1.15-3.95) were associated with significant improvement in adenoma detection. PCCRC risk was significantly lower when colonoscopies were performed during a time interval of less than every 3 years (OR, 0.35; 95% CI, 0.14-0.97). We observed a consistent but not significant reduction in PCCRC risk for a previous complete examination (OR, 0.16; 95% CI, 0.03-1.28), adequate bowel preparation (OR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.17-3.24), or previous use of high-definition colonoscopy (OR, 0.37; 95% CI, 0.02-2.33).

CONCLUSIONS

Complete colonoscopies with adequate bowel preparation and chromoendoscopy use are associated with improved adenoma detection, while surveillance intervals of less than 3 years are associated with a reduction of PCCRC incidence. In LS, high-quality colonoscopy surveillance is of utmost importance for CRC prevention.

Endoscopy to Diagnose and Prevent Digestive Cancers in Lynch Syndrome

Lynch syndrome patients could benefit from various recommendations to prevent digestive cancers. In this review, we summarize the criteria to identify Lynch syndrome in patients with digestive cancers. We detail endoscopic screening procedures in patients with Lynch syndrome for gastric, small bowel, pancreatic, and colorectal cancers. We review the precise modalities of endoscopic follow-up, particularly the discrepancies that exist between the guidelines of the various scientific societies. We discuss the treatment of colorectal cancers in Lynch syndrome cases and patient adherence to endoscopic follow-up programs.

Colorectal cancer screening in Lynch syndrome: Indication, techniques and future perspectives

Lynch syndrome (LS) is an inherited predisposition to colorectal cancer (CRC), responsible for 3-5% of all CRC. This syndrome is characterized by the early occurrence of colorectal neoplastic lesions, with variable incidences depending on the type of pathogenic variants in MMR genes (MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, PMS2 and EPCAM) and demographics factors such as gender, body mass index, tobacco use and physical activity. Similar to sporadic cancers, colorectal screening by colonoscopy is efficient because it is associated with a reduction >50% of both CRC incidence and CRC related mortality. To that end, most guidelines recommend high definition screening colonoscopies in dedicated centers, starting at the age of 20-25 years old, with a surveillance interval of 1-2 years. In this review, we discuss the importance of high definition colonoscopies, including the compliance to specific key performance indicators, as well as the expected benefits of specific imaging modalities including virtual chromoendoscopy and dye-spray chromoendoscopy.

The "unnatural" history of colorectal cancer in Lynch syndrome: Lessons from colonoscopy surveillance

Individuals with Lynch syndrome (LS), one of the most common inherited cancer syndromes, are at increased risk of developing malignancies, in particular colorectal cancer (CRC). Regular colonoscopy with polypectomy is recommended to reduce CRC risk in LS individuals. However, recent independent studies demonstrated that a substantial proportion of LS individuals develop CRC despite regular colonoscopy. The reasons for this surprising observation confirmed by large prospective studies are a matter of debate. In this review, we collect existing evidence from clinical, epidemiological and molecular studies and interpret them with regard to the origins and progression of LS-associated CRC. Alongside with hypotheses addressing colonoscopy quality and pace of progression from adenoma to cancer, we discuss the role of alternative precursors and immune system in LS-associated CRC. We also identify gaps in current knowledge and make suggestions for future studies aiming at improved CRC prevention for LS individuals.

Prospective observational data informs understanding and future management of Lynch syndrome: insights from the Prospective Lynch Syndrome Database (PLSD)

The Prospective Lynch Syndrome Database (PLSD) has been developed as an international, multicentre, prospective, observational study that aims to provide age and organ-specific cancer risks according to gene and gender, estimates of survival after cancer and information on the effects of interventions. Recent reports from PLSD provided improved estimates of cancer risks and survival and showed that different time intervals between surveillance colonoscopies did not affect the incidence, stage or prognosis of colorectal cancer. The PLSD reports suggest that current management guidelines for Lynch syndrome should be revised in light of the different gene and gender-specific cancer risks and the good prognosis for the most commonly associated cancers.In this review, we describe the discrepancies between the current management guidelines for Lynch Syndrome and the most recent prospective observational studies, indicating the areas of further research.

Benefit from extended surveillance interval on colorectal cancer risk in Lynch syndrome

AIM

Although patients with Lynch syndrome have an increased risk of developing colorectal cancer, surveillance can reduce morbidity and mortality. Whether or not affected individuals benefit from lifetime surveillance depends on individual factors and patient adherence, and these may vary, complicating risk modelling. The aim of this study was to identify individual factors which influence patient adherence to surveillance programmes and whether extended surveillance interval influenced their risk of developing colorectal cancer.

METHOD

Demographics and survival data were obtained from patients (n = 1223) with Lynch syndrome, identified by interrogating the Danish Hereditary Non-Polyposis Colorectal Cancer Register. These data were linked to patient surveillance interval data which had been divided into three subsets (< 27 months, adherent to the recommended biennial programme; > 27 months, extended surveillance interval; and no surveillance) to estimate the cumulative risks and hazard ratios (HRs) for colorectal cancer.

RESULTS

In all, 147 colorectal cancers (99 first; 48 metachronous) were identified in 1223 patients. Factors associated with adherence to surveillance were female sex, a previous history of cancer and age < 75 years. The cumulative incidence for colorectal cancer was 38% (95% CI 27%-50%) for surveillance intervals < 27 months, 48% (95% CI 29%-67%) for intervals > 27 months and 72% (95% CI 61%-83%) with no surveillance. Adjusted HRs were 0.22 for surveillance intervals < 27 months and 0.32 for surveillance intervals > 27 months. Extended surveillance intervals > 27 months had a non-significant benefit with an HR of 1.51 (95% CI 0.83-2.75) compared to surveillance intervals < 27 months.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates that adherence to colonoscopic surveillance in Lynch syndrome varies with age, sex and cancer history and demonstrates a consistent benefit from colorectal cancer surveillance, though it might be lower for individuals with extended intervals.

[Role of the PRED-IdF, a regional network dedicated to patients with hereditary predisposition to digestive cancers]

Patients with hereditary predisposition to digestive cancer are at high risk of neoplasia and management in expert centers is recommended. The PRED-IdF network was thus created in 2009, with the support of the French National Cancer Institute (INCa), covering Paris and its suburbs, including five teaching hospitals and two oncology-dedicated institutes. The aim of this network is to offer optimized cancer screening programs based on expert recommendations to patients with hereditary predisposition. Any patient with suspicion of hereditary colorectal syndrome can be referred to the PRED-IdF network. The missions of this network include the establishment of a personalized screening program (PSP), coordination of PSP, expertise/recourse for difficult cases and research. Since 2009, 3384 patients have been included. We genetically identified 1925 patients with Lynch syndrome and 539 with familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) (including both APC and MUTYH mutations), representing 72.8% of the PRED-IdF cohort. The PRED-IdF is also an important promotor of research in the field. We recently demonstrated the beneficial impact of the network in terms of colorectal cancer occurrence in patients with Lynch syndrome. Moreover, the PRED-IdF is involved in many studies ranging from basic science collaborations to randomized controlled trials. The long-term objective is to offer to all patients a personalized medical approach.

Incident colorectal cancer in Lynch syndrome is usually not preceded by compromised quality of colonoscopy

Background: Lifetime incidence of colorectal cancer (CRC) especially in carriers of MLH1 and MSH2 pathogenic germline variants in mismatch repair genes is high despite ongoing colonoscopy surveillance. Lynch syndrome (LS) registries have been criticized for not reporting colonoscopy quality adequately.Methods: Prospective follow-up data from the national registry were combined with a retrospective assessment of the colonoscopy reports from Helsinki University Hospital electronic patients records in 2004-2019.Results: Total of 366 MLH1, MSH2 and MSH6 carriers underwent 1564 colorectal endoscopies (mean 4.3 per patient, range 1-10) at a single unit. At least one subsequent examination was performed on 336 patients.Bowel preparation was suboptimal (Boston Bowel Preparation Scale 0-2) on either right or left side of the colon in 12.9% of planned surveillance examinations. Caecal intubation rate for full-length colonoscopies was 98.9%. Adenoma detection rate (ADR) was 15.8% in 2004-2014 but substantially increased (21.9%) after introduction of high-definition (HD) technology in 2015-2019 (p = .004; 18.7% across all examinations).CRCs were detected in 23 cases. Nineteen cancers were detected after 977 optimal quality colonoscopies and 4 after 151 compromised quality (BBPS <3 or non-complete examination; p = .16). Advanced neoplasias were not more frequently reported after compromised quality examinations.Conclusion: The majority of LS-associated incident CRCs were detected after colonoscopies with proper bowel preparation and complete examination. There is a considerable time trend towards higher ADR after introducing HD technology of endoscopes. The effect of time trend in ADR to CRC incidence in LS needs to be studied in larger, prospective settings.

Survival by colon cancer stage and screening interval in Lynch syndrome: a prospective Lynch syndrome database report

BACKGROUND

We previously reported that in pathogenic mismatch repair (path_MMR) variant carriers, the incidence of colorectal cancer (CRC) was not reduced when colonoscopy was undertaken more frequently than once every 3 years, and that CRC stage and interval since last colonoscopy were not correlated.

METHODS

The Prospective Lynch Syndrome Database (PLSD) that records outcomes of surveillance was examined to determine survival after colon cancer in relation to the time since previous colonoscopy and pathological stage. Only path_MMR variants scored by the InSiGHT variant database as class 4 or 5 (clinically actionable) were included in the analysis.

RESULTS

Ninety-nine path_MMR carriers had no cancer prior to or at first colonoscopy, but subsequently developed colon cancer. Among these, 96 were 65 years of age or younger at diagnosis, and included 77 path_MLH1, 17 path_MSH2, and 2 path_MSH6 carriers. The number of cancers detected within < 1.5, 1.5-2.5, 2.5-3.5 and at > 3.5 years after previous colonoscopy were 9, 43, 31 and 13, respectively. Of these, 2, 8, 4 and 3 were stage III, respectively, and only one stage IV (interval 2.5-3.5 years) disease. Ten-year crude survival after colon cancer were 93, 94 and 82% for stage I, II and III disease, respectively (p < 0.001). Ten-year crude survival when the last colonoscopy had been < 1.5, 1.5-2.5, 2.5-3.5 or > 3.5 years before diagnosis, was 89, 90, 90 and 92%, respectively (p = 0.91).

CONCLUSIONS

In path_MLH1 and path_MSH2 carriers, more advanced colon cancer stage was associated with poorer survival, whereas time since previous colonoscopy was not. Although the numbers are limited, together with our previously reported findings, these results may be in conflict with the view that follow-up of path_MMR variant carriers with colonoscopy intervals of less than 3 years provides significant benefit.

Back-to-Back Comparison of Colonoscopy With Virtual Chromoendoscopy Using a Third-Generation Narrow-Band Imaging System to Chromoendoscopy With Indigo Carmine in Patients With Lynch Syndrome

INTRODUCTION

Colonoscopic screening with indigo carmine chromoendoscopy (ICC) in patients with Lynch syndrome (LS) improves the adenoma detection rate but is time consuming and poorly used in clinical practice. Narrow-band imaging (NBI), a virtual chromoendoscopy technique, highlights superficial mucosal vessels and improves adenoma characterization. We conducted a prospective multicenter trial in a back-to-back fashion to compare the third-generation NBI with ICC for detecting colonic adenomas in patients with LS.

METHODS

In a multicenter, prospective, noninferiority trial, 138 patients underwent a double colonoscopy, first with NBI, followed by ICC, in a back-to-back design. The primary noninferiority outcome measure was the number of patients with at least one adenoma after NBI compared with the number of patients with at least one adenoma after NBI and ICC.

RESULTS

The 138 analyzable patients were all proven mismatch repair mutation carriers for LS (MLH1 = 33%, MSH2 = 47%, MSH6 = 15%, PMS2 = 4%, and EPCAM = 1%). The mean age (SD) was 40.5 (14.7) years, and 64 (46.4%) were men. The median withdrawal time for an NBI procedure was 8 minutes (interquartile range 6-11) compared with 13 minutes (interquartile range 8-17) for ICC. At least one adenoma was detected during the initial NBI pass in 28 patients (20.3%), and 42 patients (30.4%) had at least one adenoma detected after both NBI and ICC (difference, 10.1%; 95% confidence interval, -0.1%-20.3%); this represents an increase of 50.0% of the adenoma detection rate. ICC detected additional adenomas in 25 patients (18.1%).

DISCUSSION

Colonoscopy combining NBI and ICC detects more adenomas than third-generation NBI alone in patients with LS, respectively, 30.4% vs 20.3% (difference, 10.1%; 95% confidence interval, -0.1 to 20.3), thus failing the noninferiority assumption of NBI compared with combined NBI and ICC. Although less time consuming, colonoscopy using the third-generation NBI cannot be recommended to replace ICC in patients with LS.