Marital status does not affect the cancer-specific survival of patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma treated with nephroureterectomy: a propensity score matching study

Unmarried Status Effect on Stage at Presentation and Treatment Patterns in Non-Metastatic Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma Patients

BACKGROUND

Unmarried status has been associated with higher proportions of locally advanced stage and lower treatment dose intensification rates in several urological and non-urological malignancies. However, no previous investigators focused on the association between unmarried status and advanced stage (T3-4N0-2) at presentation and lower nephroureterectomy (RNU) and systemic therapy (ST) rates in non-metastatic upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) patients.

METHODS

Using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database 2000-2020, all non-metastatic UTUC patients were identified. Multivariable logistic regression models (LRMs) tested for differences in stage at presentation and treatment (RNU and ST) according to marital status (married vs unmarried), in a sex-specific fashion.

RESULTS

Of all 8544 non-metastatic UTUC patients, 4748 (56%) were male vs 3190 (44%) were female. Of all 4748 male UTUC patients, 1191 (25%) were unmarried. Of all 3190 female UTUC patients, 1608 (50%) were unmarried. In multivariable LRMs predicting RNU, unmarried status was an independent predictor of lower RNU rates in male (Odds Ratio [OR]: 0.56; P < .001), but not in female (OR: 0.81; P = .1) non-metastatic UTUC patients. In multivariable LRMs predicting ST exposure, unmarried status was an independent predictor of lower ST rates in both male (OR:0.73; P = .03) and female (OR:0.64; P < .001) UTUC patients. In multivariable LRMs predicting locally advanced stage (T3-4N0-2), unmarried status was not associated with an increased risk of locally advanced stage at presentation in either male (OR: 0.95; P = .5) or female (OR: 0.99; P = .9) UTUC patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Unmarried male UTUC patients appear at risk of less being able to access RNU, relative to their married counterparts. Moreover, unmarried UTUC patients appear to less benefit from ST, regardless of sex. Conversely, unmarried status was not associated with an increased risk of locally advanced stage at presentation in either male or female UTUC patients.

Unmarried status effect on stage at presentation and treatment patterns in primary urethral carcinoma patients

BACKGROUND

Unmarried status has been associated with advanced stage at presentation and lower treatment dose intensification rates in several urological and non-urological malignancies. However, no previous investigators focused of the association of unmarried status with locally advanced stage (T3-4N0-2) at presentation and lower bi-/trimodal therapy rates in primary urethral carcinoma (PUC) patients. To address these knowledge gaps, we relied on the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database.

METHODS

Within the SEER database 2000 to 2020, all non-metastatic PUC patients were identified. Logistic regression models (LRMs) tested for differences in stage at presentation and treatment modality in the overall cohort and then in a sex-specific fashion, according to marital status (married vs unmarried).

RESULTS

Of all 1,430 non-metastatic PUC patients, 1,004 (70%) were male vs 426 (30%) were female. Of 1,004 male PUC patients, 272 (27%) were unmarried. Of all 426 female PUC patients, 239 (56%) were unmarried. In multivariable LRMs predicting T3-4N0-2, unmarried status was independently associated with an increased risk of locally advanced stage at presentation in the overall cohort (odds ratio [OR]:1.31; P = 0.03) and in female patients (OR:1.62; P = 0.02), but not in male PUC patients (P = 0.6). In multivariable LRMs predicting bi-/trimodal therapy, unmarried status was an independent predictor of lower bi-/trimodal therapy rates in the overall cohort (OR:0.73; P = 0.02) and in male patients (OR:0.60; P = 0.007), but not in female PUC patients (P = 0.6).

CONCLUSIONS

Unmarried female PUC patients more likely harbored locally advanced stage at presentation. Conversely, unmarried male PUC patients are less likely to benefit from bi-/trimodal therapy.

Impact of marital status at diagnosis on the survival of patients with anal canal squamous cell carcinoma: a propensity score-matched analysis

PURPOSE

Marital status has been shown to be an important psychosocial factor that plays an important role in the prognosis of various cancers. The effect of marital status on survival outcomes in anal canal squamous cell carcinoma has not been studied. The purpose of this study was to address this issue.

METHODS

According to the established screening criteria, we obtained 2429 patients with anal canal squamous cell carcinoma from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Kaplan-Meier analysis and multivariate Cox regression analysis were used to analyze the survival of anal canal squamous cell carcinoma patients with different marital status. 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM) was used to match 979 unmarried patients with 979 married patients to further demonstrate the effect of marital status on the survival of patients with anal canal squamous cell carcinoma.

RESULTS

The 5-year overall survival (OS) rates of married, divorced/separated, single, and widowed patients with anal canal squamous cell carcinoma were 75.6%, 69.7%, 62.2%, and 51.3%, respectively and the corresponding 5-year cancer-specific survival (CSS) rates were 80.7%, 79.6%, 70.1%, and 68.9%, respectively. Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that marital status, sex, race, SEER stage, tumor size, regional nodes positive, primary site surgery, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy were independent prognostic factors for OS and CSS, and also demonstrated that the widowed patients suffered the highest risk mortality. Furthermore, married patients were found to have better OS and CSS than unmarried patients both before and after propensity score matching.

CONCLUSION

This study found that married patients with anal canal squamous cell carcinoma had better survival outcomes, while widowed patients had the worst OS and CSS.

Contemporary analysis of the effect of marital status on survival in upper tract urothelial carcinoma patients treated with radical nephroureterectomy: A population-based study

PURPOSE

Unmarried status is an established risk factor for worse cancer control outcomes in various malignancies. Moreover, several investigators observed worse outcomes in unmarried males, but not in females. This concept has not been tested in upper tract urothelial carcinoma and represents the topic of the study.

METHODS

Within Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results database (2004-2016), we identified 8833 non-metastatic upper tract urothelial carcinoma patients treated with radical nephroureterectomy (5208 males vs. 3625 females). Kaplan Meier plots and multivariable Cox regression models predicting overall mortality, other-cause mortality and cancer-specific mortality were used.

RESULTS

Overall, 1323 males (25.4%) and 1986 females (54.8%) were unmarried. Except for lower rates of chemotherapy in unmarried males (15.6 vs. 19.6%, P = 0.001) and unmarried females (13.8 vs. 23.6%, P < 0.001), no clinically meaningful differences were recorded between males and females. In multivariable Cox regression models, unmarried status was an independent predictor of higher overall mortality in both males (Hazard ratio [HR]: 1.33, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.19-1.48, P < 0.001) and females (HR: 1.13, 95%CI: 1.00-1.27, P = 0.04), as well as of higher other-cause mortality in both males (HR: 1.53, 95%CI: 1.26-1.84,P < 0.001) and females (HR: 1.43, 95%CI: 1.15-1.78,P < 0.01). However, higher cancer-specific mortality was only recorded in unmarried males (HR: 1.24, 95%CI: 1.08-1.42, P < 0.01), but not in females (HR: 1.02, 95%CI: 0.89-1.17, P = 0.7).

CONCLUSION

Unmarried status is a marker of worse survival in both males and females and should be flagged as an important risk factor at diagnosis, in both sexes. In consequence, unmarried patients represent candidate for interventions aimed at decreasing the survival gap relative to married counterparts.

Marital Status Independently Predicts Glioma Patient Mortality: A Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Analysis

OBJECTIVE

To examine the impact of marital status on the mortality of patients with primary malignant brain tumors excluding bias from basic characteristics and treatment.

METHODS

We used the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program to identify 81,277 patients diagnosed from 2000 through 2016 with the most common primary malignant brain tumors, including glioma, ependymoma, and medulloblastoma. To avoid bias, we used the propensity score matching method to match 44,854 patients with complete clinical and follow-up information. Then, we used Cox regression and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis to investigate the impact of marital status on cancer patient mortality.

RESULTS

Married patients were more likely to receive surgery and adjuvant chemo- or radiotherapy than single and divorced, separated, and widowed (DSW) patients (all P < 0.001). Married patients with high grade glioma were more likely to survive longer and less likely to die of their malignance compared with single (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 1.120; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.069 to 1.174; P < 0.001; OR 1.078; 95% CI, 1.025 to 1.133; P = 0.003; respectively), and DSW patients (OR 1.117; 95% CI, 1.074 to 1.161; P <0.001; OR 1.090; 95% CI, 1.046 to 1.136; P<0.001; respectively) (all adjusted to the married group). Similar results were identified in patients with low-grade glioma but not ependymoma and medulloblastoma.

CONCLUSIONS

Even after adjusting for known confounders, married patients with high-grade glioma and low-grade glioma are at higher possibility to have a better outcome. This study highlights the potential significance that intimate support from spouse can improve glioma patient survival.