1
|
Schader JF, Helfen T, Braunstein V, Ockert B, Haasters F, Hertel R, Südkamp N, Milz S, Sprecher CM. Experimental guide wire placement for total shoulder arthroplasty in glenoid models: higher precision for patient-specific aiming guides compared to standard technique without learning curve. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2024; 25:449. [PMID: 38844899 PMCID: PMC11155061 DOI: 10.1186/s12891-024-07549-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2023] [Accepted: 05/27/2024] [Indexed: 06/10/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patient-specific aiming devices (PSAD) may improve precision and accuracy of glenoid component positioning in total shoulder arthroplasty, especially in degenerative glenoids. The aim of this study was to compare precision and accuracy of guide wire positioning into different glenoid models using a PSAD versus a standard guide. METHODS Three experienced shoulder surgeons inserted 2.5 mm K-wires into polyurethane cast glenoid models of type Walch A, B and C (in total 180 models). Every surgeon placed guide wires into 10 glenoids of each type with a standard guide by DePuy Synthes in group (I) and with a PSAD in group (II). Deviation from planned version, inclination and entry point was measured, as well as investigation of a possible learning curve. RESULTS Maximal deviation in version in B- and C-glenoids in (I) was 20.3° versus 4.8° in (II) (p < 0.001) and in inclination was 20.0° in (I) versus 3.7° in (II) (p < 0.001). For B-glenoid, more than 50% of the guide wires in (I) had a version deviation between 11.9° and 20.3° compared to ≤ 2.2° in (II) (p < 0.001). 50% of B- and C-glenoids in (I) showed a median inclination deviation of 4.6° (0.0°-20.0°; p < 0.001) versus 1.8° (0.0°-4.0°; p < 0.001) in (II). Deviation from the entry point was always less than 5.0 mm when using PSAD compared to a maximum of 7.7 mm with the standard guide and was most pronounced in type C (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION PSAD enhance precision and accuracy of guide wire placement particularly for deformed B and C type glenoids compared to a standard guide in vitro. There was no learning curve for PSAD. However, findings of this study cannot be directly translated to the clinical reality and require further corroboration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jana F Schader
- AO Research Institute Davos, Clavadelerstrasse 8, Davos Platz, 7270, Switzerland.
- Department of Orthopedics, Balgrist University Hospital, University of Zurich, Forchstrasse 340, Zurich, 8008, Switzerland.
| | - Tobias Helfen
- AO Research Institute Davos, Clavadelerstrasse 8, Davos Platz, 7270, Switzerland
- Department of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, Musculoskeletal University Center Munich (MUM), LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Volker Braunstein
- AO Research Institute Davos, Clavadelerstrasse 8, Davos Platz, 7270, Switzerland
- OrthoPlus München, Alte Börse, Lenbachplatz 2a, 80333, Munich, Germany
| | - Ben Ockert
- AO Research Institute Davos, Clavadelerstrasse 8, Davos Platz, 7270, Switzerland
- Department of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, Musculoskeletal University Center Munich (MUM), LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Florian Haasters
- Schön Klinik München Harlaching, Zentrum für Knie-, Hüft- und Schulterchirurgie, Harlachinger Strasse 51, 81547, Munich, Germany
| | - Ralph Hertel
- Schulter & Ellbogen Zentrum Bern, Lindenhofspital, Bremgartenstrasse 117, Bern, 3001, Switzerland
| | - Norbert Südkamp
- Medical Faculty, Albert-Ludwigs-University Freiburg, 79085, Fahnenbergplatz, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany
| | - Stefan Milz
- Anatomische Anstalt der Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Pettenkoferstrasse 11, 80336, Munich, Germany
| | - Christoph M Sprecher
- AO Research Institute Davos, Clavadelerstrasse 8, Davos Platz, 7270, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Can Kolac U, Paksoy A, Akgün D. Three-dimensional planning, navigation, patient-specific instrumentation and mixed reality in shoulder arthroplasty: a digital orthopedic renaissance. EFORT Open Rev 2024; 9:517-527. [PMID: 38828974 PMCID: PMC11195342 DOI: 10.1530/eor-23-0200] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/05/2024] Open
Abstract
Accurate component placement in shoulder arthroplasty is crucial for avoiding complications, achieving superior biomechanical performance and optimizing functional outcomes. Shoulder and elbow surgeons have explored various methods to improve surgical understanding and precise execution including preoperative planning with 3D computed tomography (CT), patient-specific instrumentation (PSI), intraoperative navigation, and mixed reality (MR). 3D preoperative planning facilitated by CT scans and advanced software, enhances surgical precision, influences decision-making for implant types and approaches, reduces errors in guide pin placement, and contributes to cost-effectiveness. Navigation demonstrates benefits in reducing malpositioning, optimizing baseplate stability, improving humeral cut, and potentially conserving bone stock, although challenges such as varied operating times and costs warrant further investigation. The personalized patient care and enhanced operational efficiency associated with PSI are not only attractive for achieving desired component positions but also hold promise for improved outcomes in complex cases involving glenoid bone loss. Augmented reality (AR) and virtual reality (VR) technologies play a pivotal role in reshaping shoulder arthroplasty. They offer benefits in preoperative planning, intraoperative guidance, and interactive surgery. Studies demonstrate their effectiveness in AR-guided guidewire placement, providing real-time surgical advice during reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA). Additionally, these technologies show promise in orthopedic training, delivering superior realism and accelerating learning compared to conventional methods.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ulas Can Kolac
- Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Alp Paksoy
- Charité University Hospital, Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Berlin, Germany
| | - Doruk Akgün
- Charité University Hospital, Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Meeker DG, Bozoghlian MF, Hartog TD, Corlette J, Nepola JV, Patterson BM. Rate of incidental findings on routine preoperative computed tomography for shoulder arthroplasty. Clin Shoulder Elb 2024; 27:169-175. [PMID: 38556913 PMCID: PMC11181057 DOI: 10.5397/cise.2023.00836] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/23/2023] [Revised: 11/18/2023] [Accepted: 12/17/2023] [Indexed: 04/02/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Incidental findings are commonly noted in advanced imaging studies. Few data exist regarding the rate of incidental findings on computed tomography (CT) for preoperative shoulder arthroplasty planning. This study aims to identify the incidence of these findings and the rate at which they warrant further work-up to help guide orthopedic surgeons in counseling patients. METHODS A retrospective review was performed to identify patients with available preoperative shoulder CT who subsequently underwent shoulder arthroplasty procedures at a single institution between 2015 and 2021. Data including age, sex, and smoking status were obtained. Radiology reports for CTs were reviewed for incidental findings and categorized based on location, tissue type, and/or body system. The rate of incidental findings and the rate at which further follow-up was recommended by the radiologist were determined. RESULTS A total of 617 patients was identified. There were 173 incidental findings noted in 146 of these patients (23.7%). Findings ranged from pulmonary (59%), skin/soft tissue (16%), thyroid (13%), vascular (9%), spinal (2%), and abdominal (1%) areas. Of the pulmonary findings, 50% were pulmonary nodules and 47% were granulomatous disease. Overall, the final radiology report recommended further follow-up for 50% of the patients with incidental findings. CONCLUSIONS Incidental findings are relatively common in preoperative CTs obtained for shoulder arthroplasty, occurring in nearly one-quarter of patients. Most of these findings are pulmonary in nature. Overall, half of the patients with incidental findings were recommended for further follow-up. These results establish population data to guide orthopedic surgeons in patient counseling. Level of evidence: III.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel G. Meeker
- Department of Orthopedics and Rehabilitation, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA
| | - Maria F. Bozoghlian
- Department of Orthopedics and Rehabilitation, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA
| | - Taylor Den Hartog
- Department of Orthopedics and Rehabilitation, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA
| | - Jill Corlette
- Department of Orthopedics and Rehabilitation, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA
| | - James V. Nepola
- Department of Orthopedics and Rehabilitation, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA
| | - Brendan M. Patterson
- Department of Orthopedics and Rehabilitation, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Bischofreiter M, Sacan E, Gattringer M, Gruber MS, Breulmann FL, Kindermann H, Heuberer P, Mattiassich G, Ortmaier R. The Value of Computed Tomography-Based Planning in Shoulder Arthroplasty Compared to Intra-/Interobserver Reliability of X-ray Planning. J Clin Med 2024; 13:2022. [PMID: 38610787 PMCID: PMC11012767 DOI: 10.3390/jcm13072022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/07/2024] [Revised: 03/24/2024] [Accepted: 03/27/2024] [Indexed: 04/14/2024] Open
Abstract
Background: Reversed total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) is an established surgery for many pathologies of the shoulder and the demand continues to rise with an aging population. Preoperative planning is mandatory to support the surgeon's understanding of the patient's individual anatomy and, therefore, is crucial for the patient's outcome. Methods: In this observational study, we identified 30 patients who underwent RTSA with two- and three-dimensional preoperative planning. Each patient underwent new two-dimensional planning from a medical student and an orthopedic resident as well as through a mid-volume and high-volume shoulder surgeon, which was repeated after a minimum of 4 weeks. The intra- and interobserver reliability was then analyzed and compared to the 3D planning and the implanted prosthesis. The evaluated parameters were the size of the pegged glenoid baseplate, glenosphere, and humeral short stem. Results: The inter-rater reliability showed higher deviations in all four raters compared to the 3D planning of the base plate, glenosphere, and shaft. The intra-rater reliability showed a better correlation in more experienced raters, especially in the planning of the shaft. Conclusions: Our study shows that 3D planning is more accurate than traditional planning on plain X-rays, despite experienced shoulder surgeons showing better results in 2D planning than inexperienced ones.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martin Bischofreiter
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Ordensklinikum Barmherzige Schwestern Linz, Vinzenzgruppe Center of Orthopedic Excellence, Teaching Hospital of the Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, 5020 Salzburg, Austria
- Department of Orthopedic and Trauma Surgery, Clinic Diakonissen Schladming, 8970 Schladming, Austria
| | - Edanur Sacan
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Ordensklinikum Barmherzige Schwestern Linz, Vinzenzgruppe Center of Orthopedic Excellence, Teaching Hospital of the Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, 5020 Salzburg, Austria
| | - Michael Gattringer
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Ordensklinikum Barmherzige Schwestern Linz, Vinzenzgruppe Center of Orthopedic Excellence, Teaching Hospital of the Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, 5020 Salzburg, Austria
| | - Michael S. Gruber
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Ordensklinikum Barmherzige Schwestern Linz, Vinzenzgruppe Center of Orthopedic Excellence, Teaching Hospital of the Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, 5020 Salzburg, Austria
| | - Franziska L. Breulmann
- Department of Orthopedic Sports Medicine, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, 81675 Munich, Germany
| | - Harald Kindermann
- Department of Marketing and Electronic Business, University of Applied Sciences Upper Austria, 4400 Steyr, Austria
| | | | - Georg Mattiassich
- Department of Orthopedic and Trauma Surgery, Clinic Diakonissen Schladming, 8970 Schladming, Austria
| | - Reinhold Ortmaier
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Ordensklinikum Barmherzige Schwestern Linz, Vinzenzgruppe Center of Orthopedic Excellence, Teaching Hospital of the Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, 5020 Salzburg, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Castricini R, Mercurio M, Galasso O, Sanzo V, De Gori M, De Benedetto M, Orlando N, Gasparini G. Femoral head allograft for glenoid bone loss in primary reverse shoulder arthroplasty: functional and radiologic outcomes. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2024; 33:e58-e67. [PMID: 37506998 DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2023.06.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2023] [Revised: 06/05/2023] [Accepted: 06/21/2023] [Indexed: 07/30/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Several techniques have been adopted during primary reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) to manage glenoid bone defect. Among bone grafts, humeral head autograft is currently the mainstream option. However, autologous humeral heads may be unavailable or inadequate, and allografts may be a viable alternative. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the functional and radiologic outcomes of femoral head allografts for glenoid bone defects in primary RSA. METHODS We conducted a retrospective study with prospective data collection enrolling 20 consecutive patients who underwent RSA with femoral head allografts for glenoid bone defects. Indications for surgery were eccentric cuff tear arthropathy in 10 cases (50%), concentric osteoarthritis in 9 cases (45%), and fracture sequelae in 1 case (5%). Each patient was evaluated preoperatively and at follow-up by radiologic and computed tomography (CT) and by assessing the range of motion (ROM) and the Constant-Murley score (CMS). A CT-based software, a patient-specific 3D model of the scapula, and patient-specific instrumentation were used to shape the graft and to assess the position of K-wire for the central peg. Postoperatively, CT scans were used to identify graft incorporation and resorption. RESULTS After a median follow-up of 26.5 months (24-38), ROM and CMS showed a statistically significant improvement (all P = .001). The median measures of the graft were as follows: 28 mm (28-29) for diameter, 22° (10°-31°) for angle, 4 mm (2-8 mm) for minimum thickness, and 15 mm (11-21 mm) for maximum thickness. Before the surgery, the median glenoid version was 21.8° (16.5°-33.5°) for the retroverted glenoids and -13.5° (-23° to -12°) for the anteverted glenoids. At the follow-up, the median postoperative baseplate retroversion was 5.7° (2.2°-1.5°) (P = .001), and this value was close to the 4° retroversion planned on the preoperative CT-based software. Postoperative major complications were noted in 4 patients: 2 dislocations, 1 baseplate failure following a high-energy trauma, and 1 septic baseplate failure. Partial graft resorption without glenoid component failure was observed in 3 cases that did not require revision surgery. CONCLUSION The femoral head allograft for glenoid bone loss in primary RSA restores shoulder function, with CMS values comparable to those of sex- and age-matched healthy individuals. A high rate of incorporation of the graft and satisfactory correction of the glenoid version can be expected after surgery. The management of glenoid bone defects remains a challenging procedure, and a 15% risk of major complication must be considered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Michele Mercurio
- Department of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, "Magna Græcia" University, "Mater Domini" University Hospital, Catanzaro, Italy
| | - Olimpio Galasso
- Department of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, "Magna Græcia" University, "Mater Domini" University Hospital, Catanzaro, Italy.
| | - Valentina Sanzo
- Department of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, "Magna Græcia" University, "Mater Domini" University Hospital, Catanzaro, Italy
| | - Marco De Gori
- Department of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Basso Ionio Hospital, Soverato, Italy
| | | | - Nicola Orlando
- Division of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, "Villa Verde", Fermo, Italy
| | - Giorgio Gasparini
- Department of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, "Magna Græcia" University, "Mater Domini" University Hospital, Catanzaro, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Saraglis G, Singh H, Charfare Z, Olujinmi GJ, Devecseri G, Agbaje A, Malal JG. Mid-term Results Following Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty and the Role of Navigation in the Management of Glenoid Bone Loss. Cureus 2024; 16:e54633. [PMID: 38524053 PMCID: PMC10959506 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.54633] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/21/2024] [Indexed: 03/26/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Inaccurate positioning of the glenoid component has been well described as the most common cause of early failure following a reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA). Among the latest developments in operative technique, three-dimensional preoperative planning and navigation intraoperative systems have been developed to improve the accuracy of the baseplate positioning during RSA. The primary purpose of this retrospective analysis was to investigate the mid-term results of patients who underwent an elective RSA or for acute highly comminuted proximal humerus fractures. The secondary goal was to investigate the role of navigation in the execution of preoperative planning, especially in the management of glenoid bone loss. Methodology In total, 101 cases were included in this study. Patients were divided into the following two groups: 88 cases of RSA performed without the use of navigation (conventional RSA) and 13 cases performed using intraoperative navigation (navigated RSA). For all patients included in the study, preoperative planning software was employed. Patient demographics, gender, past medical history, indication of procedure, operated site, type of glenoid component used, length of baseplate screws, and clinical assessment scores (Oxford Shoulder Score, OSS) were reported for all patients. Cases of revision shoulder arthroplasty were excluded from this study. Results The postoperative clinical assessment of patients revealed that following RSA, all patients improved significantly with a consistently upward trend of the OSS noted for both groups (conventional and navigated RSA) throughout the postoperative assessment. Despite no statistically significant difference detected, the clinical scores of the navigated RSA group outperformed those of the conventional RSA group in the postoperative period. A higher incidence of augmented baseplate use was noted in the navigated RSA group than in the conventional group (23.07% vs. 5.68%, p < 0.001). Conclusions Our results indicate that the use of intraoperative navigation appears to be a valuable tool in preoperative planning, providing accurate positioning of the baseplate, a better understanding of the glenoid anatomy, and real-time monitoring of the length and direction of the baseplate screws. It is difficult to conclude if the use of navigation leads to superior clinical outcomes, and the cost-effectiveness of its use needs to be further analyzed. Prospective randomized trials are required to assess the cost-effectiveness of routine use of navigation in RSA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Georgios Saraglis
- Orthopaedics and Trauma, Bedfordshire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Bedford, GBR
| | - Hamdip Singh
- Orthopaedics and Trauma, Bedfordshire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Bedford, GBR
| | - Zain Charfare
- Orthopaedics and Trauma, Bedfordshire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Bedford, GBR
| | | | - Gertrud Devecseri
- Orthopaedics and Trauma, Bedfordshire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Bedford, GBR
| | - Adeniyi Agbaje
- Orthopaedics and Trauma, Bedfordshire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Bedford, GBR
| | - Joby George Malal
- Orthopaedics and Trauma, Bedfordshire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Bedford, GBR
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Peri G, Troiano E, Colasanti GB, Mondanelli N, Giannotti S. Custom-made Glenoid Baseplate and Intra-Operative Navigation in Complex Revision Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Case Report. J Shoulder Elb Arthroplast 2024; 8:24715492231218183. [PMID: 38186674 PMCID: PMC10771046 DOI: 10.1177/24715492231218183] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2023] [Revised: 10/16/2023] [Accepted: 11/10/2023] [Indexed: 01/09/2024] Open
Abstract
Prosthetic instability is one of the most challenging complications to manage when considering reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA). Additional tools are available to improve accuracy in planning and execution of arthroplasties, such as 3-dimensional (3D) virtual planning based on computer tomography (CT) scan and intra-operative navigation. We report a case of an 84-year-old male treated for RSA prosthetic instability combined with severe glenoid deformity and bone loss, and subclinical periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). The definitive surgery consisted in implanting a customized metaglene component realized on the basis of the bone defect detected in the 3D-CT scan and implanted with the aid of computer-assisted intra-operative navigation. The patient was periodically followed-up for a year with clinical and radiological evaluations with the absence of further prosthetic dislocations nor PJI, a good overall satisfaction, a satisfying range of motion, and acceptable functional scores (American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Score 62, Constant-Murley Score 36). This is the first description, to our knowledge, of a customized glenoid baseplate implanted with the aid of intraoperative navigation. The combined use of 3D-CT planning and intra-operative computer-assisted navigation allows to manage complex cases of prosthetic revision surgery even where extensive bone defects are present.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giacomo Peri
- Department of Medicine Surgery and Neurosciences, University of Siena, Siena, Italy
- Section of Orthopedics, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Senese, Policlinico Santa Maria alle Scotte, Siena, Italy
| | - Elisa Troiano
- Department of Medicine Surgery and Neurosciences, University of Siena, Siena, Italy
- Section of Orthopedics, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Senese, Policlinico Santa Maria alle Scotte, Siena, Italy
| | - Giovanni Battista Colasanti
- Section of Orthopedics, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Senese, Policlinico Santa Maria alle Scotte, Siena, Italy
| | - Nicola Mondanelli
- Department of Medicine Surgery and Neurosciences, University of Siena, Siena, Italy
- Section of Orthopedics, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Senese, Policlinico Santa Maria alle Scotte, Siena, Italy
| | - Stefano Giannotti
- Department of Medicine Surgery and Neurosciences, University of Siena, Siena, Italy
- Section of Orthopedics, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Senese, Policlinico Santa Maria alle Scotte, Siena, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Harding GT, Bois AJ, Cavanagh JT, Bouliane MJ. The Use of an External Cutting Guide for Patient-Specific Bone Grafting in Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Novel Technique. J Shoulder Elb Arthroplast 2023; 7:24715492231219566. [PMID: 38106518 PMCID: PMC10722917 DOI: 10.1177/24715492231219566] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2023] [Revised: 11/01/2023] [Accepted: 11/10/2023] [Indexed: 12/19/2023] Open
Abstract
Glenoid bone loss remains a substantial challenge in reverse shoulder arthroplasty and failure to address such bone loss may lead to implant malpositioning, instability and/or premature baseplate loosening. Currently, management of glenoid bone loss can be achieved by metal augmentation or bone grafting (ie, autograft or allograft). At the present time, options for creating and shaping glenoid bone grafts include free-hand techniques and simple reusable cutting guides that create the graft at a standard shape/angle. To our knowledge, there is no external guide available that enables surgeons to accurately prepare the bone graft to the desired dimensions/shape (ie, trapezoid or biplanar) to correct the glenoid deformity. In this article, we present a novel surgical technique that utilizes an external guide for creating a patient-specific bone graft to address glenoid deformity in the setting of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Graeme T Harding
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Aaron J Bois
- Section of Orthopaedic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
- McCaig Institute for Bone and Joint Health, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Joseph T Cavanagh
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Martin J Bouliane
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Twomey-Kozak J, Hurley E, Levin J, Anakwenze O, Klifto C. Technological innovations in shoulder replacement: current concepts and the future of robotics in total shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2023; 32:2161-2171. [PMID: 37263482 DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2023.04.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2023] [Revised: 04/04/2023] [Accepted: 04/12/2023] [Indexed: 06/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) has been rapidly evolving over the last several decades, with innovative technological strategies being investigated and developed in order to achieve optimal component precision and joint alignment and stability, preserve implant longevity, and improve patient outcomes. Future advancements such as robotic-assisted surgeries, augmented reality, artificial intelligence, patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) and other peri- and preoperative planning tools will continue to revolutionize TSA. Robotic-assisted arthroplasty is a novel and increasingly popular alternative to the conventional arthroplasty procedure in the hip and knee but has not yet been investigated in the shoulder. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to conduct a narrative review of the literature on the evolution and projected trends of technological advances and robotic assistance in total shoulder arthroplasty. METHODS A narrative synthesis method was employed for this review, rather than a meta-analysis or systematic review of the literature. This decision was based on 2 primary factors: (1) the lack of eligible, peer-reviewed studies with high-quality level of evidence available for review on robotic-assisted shoulder arthroplasty, and (2) a narrative review allows for a broader scope of content analysis, including a comprehensive review of all technological advances-including robotics-within the field of TSA. A general literature search was performed using PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases. These databases were queried by 2 independent reviewers from database inception through November 11, 2022, for all articles investigating the role of robotics and technology assistance in total shoulder arthroplasty. Inclusion criteria included studies describing "shoulder arthroplasty" and "robotics." RESULTS After exclusion criteria were applied, 4 studies on robotic-assisted TSA were described in the review. Given the novelty of this technology and limited data on robotics in TSA, these studies consisted of a literature review, nonvalidated experimental biomechanical studies in sawbones models, and preclinical proof-of-concept cadaveric studies using prototype robotic technology primarily in conjunction with PSI. The remaining studies described the technological advancements in TSA, including PSI, computer-assisted navigation, artificial intelligence, machine learning, and virtual, augmented, and mixed reality. Although not yet commercially available, robotic-assisted TSA confers the theoretical advantages of precise humeral head cuts for restoration of proximal humerus anatomy, more accurate glenoid preparation, and improved soft-tissue assessment in limited early studies. CONCLUSION The evidence for the use of robotics in total hip arthroplasty and total knee arthroplasty demonstrates improved component accuracy, more precise radiographic measurements, and improved early/mid-term patient-reported and functional outcomes. Although no such data currently exist for shoulder arthroplasty given that the technology has not yet been commercialized, the lessons learned from robotic hip and knee surgery in conjunction with its rapid adoption suggests robotic-assisted TSA is on the horizon of innovation. By achieving a better understanding of the past, present, and future innovations in TSA through this narrative review, orthopedic surgeons can be better prepared for future applications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jack Twomey-Kozak
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
| | - Eoghan Hurley
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Jay Levin
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Oke Anakwenze
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Christopher Klifto
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Tarallo L, Giorgini A, Micheloni G, Montanari M, Porcellini G, Catani F. Navigation in reverse shoulder arthroplasty: how the lateralization of glenosphere can affect the clinical outcome. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2023; 143:5649-5656. [PMID: 37074371 PMCID: PMC10115375 DOI: 10.1007/s00402-023-04879-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2023] [Accepted: 04/04/2023] [Indexed: 04/20/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION One of the main causes of RSA failure is attributable to the malpositioning of the glenoid component. Initial experiences with computer-assisted surgery have shown promising results in increasing the accuracy and repeatability of placement of the glenoid component and screws. The aim of this study was to evaluate the functional clinical results, in terms of joint mobility and pain, by correlating them with intraoperative data regarding the positioning of the glenoid component. The hypothesis was that the lateralization more than 25 mm of the glenosphere can led to better stability of the prosthesis but should pay in term of a reduced range of movement and increased pain. MATERIALS AND METHODS 50 patients were enrolled between October 2018 and May 2022; they underwent RSA implantation assisted by GPS navigation system. Active ROM, ASES score and VAS pain scale were recorded before surgery. Preoperative data about glenoid inclination and version were collected by pre-op X-Rays an CT. Intraoperative data-inclination, version, medialization and lateralization of the glenoid component-were recorded using computer-assisted surgery. 46 patients had been further clinically and radiographically re-evaluated at 3-months, 6-months, 1-year, and 2-years follow-up. RESULTS We found a statistically significant correlation between anteposition and glenosphere lateralization value (DM - 6.057 mm; p = 0.043). Furthermore a statistically significant correlation has been shown between abduction movement and the lateralization value (DM - 7.723 mm; p = 0.015). No other statistically significant associations were found when comparing the values of glenoid inclination and version with the range of motion achieved by the patients after reverse shoulder arthroplasty. CONCLUSION We observed that the patients with the best anteposition and abduction results had a glenosphere lateralization between 18 and 22 mm. When increasing the lateralization above 22 mm or reducing it below 18 mm, on the other hand, both movements considered decreased their range. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level IV; Case Series; Treatment Study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luigi Tarallo
- Orthopedics and Traumatology Department, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia - Modena, Via del Pozzo 71, 41125, Modena, Italy.
| | - Andrea Giorgini
- Orthopedics and Traumatology Department, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia - Modena, Via del Pozzo 71, 41125, Modena, Italy
| | - Gianmario Micheloni
- Orthopedics and Traumatology Department, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia - Modena, Via del Pozzo 71, 41125, Modena, Italy
| | - Marta Montanari
- Orthopedics and Traumatology Department, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia - Modena, Via del Pozzo 71, 41125, Modena, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Porcellini
- Orthopedics and Traumatology Department, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia - Modena, Via del Pozzo 71, 41125, Modena, Italy
| | - Fabio Catani
- Orthopedics and Traumatology Department, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia - Modena, Via del Pozzo 71, 41125, Modena, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Velasquez Garcia A, Abdo G, Sanchez-Sotelo J, Morrey ME. The Value of Computer-Assisted Navigation for Glenoid Baseplate Implantation in Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. JBJS Rev 2023; 11:01874474-202308000-00008. [PMID: 37616447 DOI: 10.2106/jbjs.rvw.23.00038] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/26/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Glenoid baseplate malpositioning during reverse total shoulder arthroplasty can contribute to perimeter impingement, dislocation, and loosening. Despite advances in preoperative planning, conventional instrumentation may lead to considerable inaccuracy in implant positioning unless patient-specific guides are used. Optical navigation has the potential to improve accuracy and precision when implanting a reverse shoulder arthroplasty baseplate. This systematic review aimed to analyze the most recent evidence on the accuracy and precision of glenoid baseplate positioning using intraoperative navigation and its potential impact on component selection and surgical time. METHODS We conducted a systematic review following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses criteria. The PubMed, Scopus, and EMBASE databases were queried in July 2022 to identify all studies that compared navigation vs. conventional instrumentation for reverse shoulder arthroplasty. Data of deviation from the planned baseplate version and inclination, the use of standard or augmented glenoid components, and surgical time were extracted. Quantitative analysis from the included publications was performed using the inverse-variance approach and Mantel-Haenszel method. RESULTS Of the 2,048 records identified in the initial query, only 10 articles met the inclusion and exclusion criteria, comprising 667 shoulders that underwent reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. The pooled mean difference (MD) of the deviation from the planned baseplate position for the clinical studies was -0.44 (95% confidence interval [CI], -3.26; p = 0.76; I2 = 36%) for version and -8.75 (95% CI, -16.83 to -0.68; p = 0.02; I2 = 83%) for inclination, both in favor of navigation. The odds ratio of selecting an augmented glenoid component after preoperative planning and navigation-assisted surgery was 8.09 (95% CI, 3.82-17.14; p < 0.00001; I2 = 60%). The average surgical time was 12 minutes longer in the navigation group (MD 12.46, 95% CI, 5.20-19.72; p = 0.0008; I2 = 71%). CONCLUSIONS Preoperative planning integrated with computer-assisted navigation surgery seems to increase the accuracy and precision of glenoid baseplate inclination compared with the preoperatively planned placement during reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. The surgical time and proportion of augmented glenoid components significantly increase when using navigation. However, the clinical impact of these findings on improving prosthesis longevity, complications, and patient functional outcomes is still unknown. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level III, systematic review and meta-analysis. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ausberto Velasquez Garcia
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Clínica Universidad de los Andes, Santiago, Chile
| | - Glen Abdo
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
- Internal Medicine Residency Program, New York Medical College at St Mary's General Hospital, Valhalla, New York
| | | | - Mark E Morrey
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Jennewine BR, Brolin TJ. Emerging Technologies in Shoulder Arthroplasty: Navigation, Mixed Reality, and Preoperative Planning. Orthop Clin North Am 2023; 54:209-225. [PMID: 36894293 DOI: 10.1016/j.ocl.2022.11.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/11/2023]
Abstract
Shoulder arthroplasty is a rapidly improving and utilized management for end-stage arthritis that is associated with improved functional outcomes, pain relief, and long-term implant survival. Accurate placement of the glenoid and humeral components is critical for improved outcomes. Traditionally, preoperative planning was limited to radiographs and 2-dimensional computed tomography (CT); however, 3-dimensional CT is becoming more commonly utilized and necessary to understand complex glenoid and humeral deformities. To further increase accurate component placement, intraoperative assistive devices-patient-specific instrumentation, navigation, and mixed reality-minimize malpositioning, increase surgeon accuracy, and maximize fixation. These intraoperative technologies likely represent the future of shoulder arthroplasty.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brenton R Jennewine
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Biomedical Engineering, University of Tennessee Health Science Center-Campbell Clinic, 920 Madison Avenue, Memphis, TN 38163, USA; Campbell Clinic Orthopaedics, 1211 Union Avenue #500, Memphis, TN 38104, USA
| | - Tyler J Brolin
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Biomedical Engineering, University of Tennessee Health Science Center-Campbell Clinic, 920 Madison Avenue, Memphis, TN 38163, USA; Campbell Clinic Orthopaedics, 1400 South Germantown Road, Germantown, TN 38138, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Galán-Olleros M, Lopiz Y, Ciller G, Alcobía-Díaz B, García-Fernández C, Marco F. Does fluoroscopy improve baseplate position compared to conventional technique in reverse shoulder arthroplasty? A preliminary study. Shoulder Elbow 2023; 15:15-26. [PMID: 36895612 PMCID: PMC9990097 DOI: 10.1177/17585732211020657] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/16/2021] [Revised: 05/07/2021] [Accepted: 05/09/2021] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
Background Accurate placement of glenoid component in reverse shoulder arthroplasty remains a challenge for surgeons of all levels of expertise; however, no studies have evaluated the utility of fluoroscopy as a surgical assistance method. Methods Prospective comparative study of 33 patients undergoing primary reverse shoulder arthroplasty during a 12-month period. Fifteen patients had a baseplate placed using the conventional "free hand" technique (control group), and 18 patients using intraoperative fluoroscopy assistance group, in a case-control design. Postoperative glenoid position was evaluated on postoperative Computed Tomography (CT) scan. Results The mean deviation of version and inclination for fluoroscopy assistance vs. control group was 1.75° (0.675-3.125) vs. 4.2° (1.975-10.45) (p = .015), and 3.85° (0-7.225) vs. 10.35° (4.35-18.75) (p = .009). The distance from the central peg midpoint to the inferior glenoid rim (fluoroscopy assistance 14.61 mm/control 4.75 mm, p = .581) and the surgical time (fluoroscopy assistance 1.93 ± 0.57/control 2.18 ± 0.44 h, p = .400) showed no differences, with an average radiation dose of 0.45 mGy and fluoroscopy time of 14 s. Conclusions Accurate axial and coronal scapular plane positioning of glenoid component is improved with intraoperative fluoroscopy at the cost of a greater radiation dose and without differences in surgical time. Comparative studies are needed to determine whether their use in relation to more expensive surgical assistance systems result in similar effectiveness.L evel of evidence : Level III, therapeutic study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- María Galán-Olleros
- Shoulder and Elbow Unit, Orthopaedic
Surgery and Traumatology Department, Clínico San Carlos Hospital, Madrid,
Spain
| | - Yaiza Lopiz
- Shoulder and Elbow Unit, Orthopaedic
Surgery and Traumatology Department, Clínico San Carlos Hospital, Madrid,
Spain
- Department of Surgery, Complutense
University, Madrid, Spain
| | - Gabriel Ciller
- Shoulder and Elbow Unit, Orthopaedic
Surgery and Traumatology Department, Clínico San Carlos Hospital, Madrid,
Spain
| | - Borja Alcobía-Díaz
- Shoulder and Elbow Unit, Orthopaedic
Surgery and Traumatology Department, Clínico San Carlos Hospital, Madrid,
Spain
| | - Carlos García-Fernández
- Shoulder and Elbow Unit, Orthopaedic
Surgery and Traumatology Department, Clínico San Carlos Hospital, Madrid,
Spain
| | - Fernando Marco
- Shoulder and Elbow Unit, Orthopaedic
Surgery and Traumatology Department, Clínico San Carlos Hospital, Madrid,
Spain
- Department of Surgery, Complutense
University, Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Ganokroj P, Preuss FR, Peebles AM, Smith NS, Donovan M, Whalen RJ, Provencher MT. Revision Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty for Failed Anatomic Total Shoulder Arthroplasty With Massive Irreparable Rotator Cuff Tear. Arthrosc Tech 2022; 12:e25-e31. [PMID: 36814987 PMCID: PMC9939549 DOI: 10.1016/j.eats.2022.08.053] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/26/2022] [Accepted: 08/25/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) has become more common as surgical indications have expanded. However, the burden of revision shoulder arthroplasty has inevitably increased as well. Multiple studies have examined the use of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) as a revision option for failed anatomic TSA with a massive irreparable rotator cuff tear. Successful reconstruction of failed TSA with rTSA requires sufficient glenoid bone to place the glenoid segment, enough proximal humeral bone to allow for implantation of the humeral component, and sufficient tension in the soft-tissue envelope to ensure implant stability. In this article, we describe our preferred rTSA revision technique for the treatment of a failed TSA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Phob Ganokroj
- Steadman Philippon Research Institute, Vail, Colorado, U.S.A.,Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Fletcher R. Preuss
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California Los Angeles Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, U.S.A
| | | | - Nolan S. Smith
- University of Louisville School of Medicine, Louisville, Kentucky, U.S.A
| | | | - Ryan J. Whalen
- Steadman Philippon Research Institute, Vail, Colorado, U.S.A
| | - Matthew T. Provencher
- Steadman Philippon Research Institute, Vail, Colorado, U.S.A.,The Steadman Clinic, Vail, Colorado, U.S.A.,Address correspondence to CAPT Matthew T. Provencher, M.D., M.B.A., MC, USNR (Ret), The Steadman Clinic, 181 W Meadow Dr, Ste 400, Vail, CO 81657, U.S.A.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Italia K, Launay M, Gilliland L, Nielsen J, Pareyon R, Hollman F, Salhi A, Maharaj J, Jomaa M, Cutbush K, Gupta A. Single-Stage Revision Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty: Preoperative Planning, Surgical Technique, and Mixed Reality Execution. J Clin Med 2022; 11:jcm11247422. [PMID: 36556038 PMCID: PMC9788296 DOI: 10.3390/jcm11247422] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2022] [Revised: 12/07/2022] [Accepted: 12/11/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Revision shoulder arthroplasty is increasing with the number of primary shoulder replacements rising globally. Complex primary and revisions of shoulder arthroplasties pose specific challenges for the surgeon, which must be addressed preoperatively and intraoperatively. This article aimed to present strategies for the management of revision of shoulder arthroplasties through a single-stage approach. Preoperatively, patient factors, such as age, comorbidities, and bone quality, should be considered. The use of planning software can aid in accurately evaluating implants in situ and predict bony anatomy that will remain after explantation during the revision surgery. The planning from such software can then be executed with the help of mixed reality technology to allow accurate implant placement. Single-stage revision is performed in two steps (debridement as first step, implantation and reconstruction as the second step), guided by the following principles: adequate debridement while preserving key soft tissue attachments (i.e., rotator cuff, pectoralis major, latissimus dorsi, deltoid), restoration of glenoid joint line using bone grafting, restoration of humeral length, reconstruction and/or reattachment of soft tissues, and strict compliance with the postoperative antibiotic regimen. Preliminary results of single-stage revision shoulder arthroplasty show improvement in patient outcomes (mean 1 year), successful treatment of infection for those diagnosed with periprosthetic joint infection, and improved cost-benefit parameters for the healthcare system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kristine Italia
- Queensland Unit for Advanced Shoulder Research (QUASR), Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD 4000, Australia
- Correspondence: (K.I.); or (A.G.); Tel.: +61-7-3208-5552 (A.G.)
| | - Marine Launay
- Queensland Unit for Advanced Shoulder Research (QUASR), Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD 4000, Australia
- Akunah, Brisbane, QLD 4120, Australia
| | - Luke Gilliland
- Queensland Unit for Advanced Shoulder Research (QUASR), Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD 4000, Australia
- Akunah, Brisbane, QLD 4120, Australia
| | - James Nielsen
- Queensland Unit for Advanced Shoulder Research (QUASR), Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD 4000, Australia
- Akunah, Brisbane, QLD 4120, Australia
| | - Roberto Pareyon
- Queensland Unit for Advanced Shoulder Research (QUASR), Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD 4000, Australia
- Greenslopes Private Hospital, Brisbane, QLD 4120, Australia
- Brisbane Private Hospital, Brisbane, QLD 4000, Australia
| | - Freek Hollman
- Queensland Unit for Advanced Shoulder Research (QUASR), Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD 4000, Australia
- Greenslopes Private Hospital, Brisbane, QLD 4120, Australia
- Brisbane Private Hospital, Brisbane, QLD 4000, Australia
| | - Asma Salhi
- Queensland Unit for Advanced Shoulder Research (QUASR), Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD 4000, Australia
- Akunah, Brisbane, QLD 4120, Australia
| | - Jashint Maharaj
- Queensland Unit for Advanced Shoulder Research (QUASR), Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD 4000, Australia
| | - Mohammad Jomaa
- Queensland Unit for Advanced Shoulder Research (QUASR), Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD 4000, Australia
- Greenslopes Private Hospital, Brisbane, QLD 4120, Australia
- Brisbane Private Hospital, Brisbane, QLD 4000, Australia
| | - Kenneth Cutbush
- Queensland Unit for Advanced Shoulder Research (QUASR), Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD 4000, Australia
- Brisbane Private Hospital, Brisbane, QLD 4000, Australia
| | - Ashish Gupta
- Queensland Unit for Advanced Shoulder Research (QUASR), Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD 4000, Australia
- Akunah, Brisbane, QLD 4120, Australia
- Greenslopes Private Hospital, Brisbane, QLD 4120, Australia
- Correspondence: (K.I.); or (A.G.); Tel.: +61-7-3208-5552 (A.G.)
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Kida H, Urita A, Momma D, Matsui Y, Endo T, Kawamura D, Taneichi H, Iwasaki N. Implications of navigation system use for glenoid component placement in reverse shoulder arthroplasty. Sci Rep 2022; 12:21190. [PMID: 36477208 PMCID: PMC9729232 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-25833-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2022] [Accepted: 12/05/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Recently, three-dimensional (3D) planning, patient-specific instruments, and navigation system have been developed to improve the accuracy of baseplate placement in reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA). The purpose of this study was to evaluate baseplate placement using the navigation system. Sixty-four shoulders in 63 patients who underwent RSA for rotator cuff tear arthropathy or irreparable rotator cuff tears were enrolled. Conventional RSA was performed in 31 shoulders and navigated RSA using pre-operative planning software was performed in 33 shoulders. The use of augmented baseplates, the version and inclination of the baseplate, and screw length were compared between conventional RSA and navigated RSA. Augmented baseplates were used more frequently in navigated RSA than in conventional RSA (20 vs 9 shoulders, p = 0.014). Baseplate alignment was 1.0° (SD 5.1) of retroversion and 2.4° (SD 6.8) of superior inclination in conventional RSA and 0.2° (SD 1.9) of anteversion and 0.3° (SD 1.7) of superior inclination in navigated RSA. Compared with conventional RSA, precision of baseplate version and inclination were higher in navigated RSA (both p < 0.001). Superior, inferior, and posteroinferior screws were significantly longer in navigated RSA than in conventional RSA (p = 0.021, 0.001 and < 0.001, respectively). Precision of superior and inferior screw lengths was significantly higher in navigated RSA than in conventional RSA (both p = 0.001). Our results suggest that adoption of pre-operative planning software increased augmented baseplate use to minimize the glenoid reaming. The navigation system allows placement of the baseplate accurately, according to the pre-operative plan. Furthermore, the navigation system enables monitoring of screw length and direction in real time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hiroaki Kida
- grid.39158.360000 0001 2173 7691Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Atsushi Urita
- grid.255137.70000 0001 0702 8004Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Dokkyo Medical University, Kitakobayashi 880, Mibu, Tochigi 321-0293 Japan
| | - Daisuke Momma
- grid.412167.70000 0004 0378 6088Center of Sports Medicine, Hokkaido University Hospital, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Yuki Matsui
- grid.39158.360000 0001 2173 7691Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Takeshi Endo
- grid.39158.360000 0001 2173 7691Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Daisuke Kawamura
- grid.39158.360000 0001 2173 7691Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Hiroshi Taneichi
- grid.255137.70000 0001 0702 8004Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Dokkyo Medical University, Kitakobayashi 880, Mibu, Tochigi 321-0293 Japan
| | - Norimasa Iwasaki
- grid.39158.360000 0001 2173 7691Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Hsu CP, Wu CT, Chen CY, Lin SC, Hsu KY. Difference analysis of the glenoid centerline between 3D preoperative planning and 3D printed prosthesis manipulation in total shoulder arthroplasty. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2022:10.1007/s00402-022-04688-8. [PMID: 36445496 DOI: 10.1007/s00402-022-04688-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2022] [Accepted: 10/30/2022] [Indexed: 12/02/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Excessive version and inclination of the glenoid component during total shoulder arthroplasty can lead to glenohumeral instability, early loosening, and even failure. The orientation and position of the central pin determine the version and inclination of the glenoid component. The purpose of this study was to compare the differences in centerline position and orientation obtained using "3D preoperative planning based on the best-fit method for glenoid elements" and the surgeon's manipulation. MATERIALS AND METHODS Twenty-nine CT images of glenohumeral osteoarthritis of the shoulder were reconstructed into a 3D model, and a 3D printer was used to create an in vitro model for the surgeon to drill the center pin. The 3D shoulder model was also used for 3D preoperative planning (3DPP) using the best-fit method for glenoid elements. The in vitro model was scanned and the version, inclination and center position were measured to compare with the 3DPP results. RESULTS The respective mean inclinations (versions) of the surgeon and 3DPP were -2.63° ± 6.60 (2.87° ± 5.97) and -1.96° ± 4.24 (-3.21° ± 4.00), respectively. There was no significant difference in the inclination and version of the surgeon and 3DPP. For surgeons, the probability of the inclination and version being greater than 10° was 13.8% (4/29) and 10.3% (3/29), respectively. Compared to the 3DPP results, the surgeon's center position was shifted down an average of 1.63 mm. There was a significant difference in the center position of the surgeon and 3DPP (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION The central pin drilled by surgeons using general instruments was significantly lower than those defined using 3D preoperative planning and standard central definitions. 3D preoperative planning prevents the version and inclination of the centerline from exceeding safe values (± 10°).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chi-Pin Hsu
- High Speed 3D Printing Research Center, National Taiwan University of Science and Technology, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Chen-Te Wu
- Department of Medical Imaging and Intervention Radiology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | - Chao-Yu Chen
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery Division of Sports Medicine and Musculoskeletal Research Center, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
| | - Shang-Chih Lin
- Graduate Institute of Biomedical Engineering, National Taiwan University of Science and Technology, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Kuo-Yao Hsu
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery Division of Sports Medicine and Musculoskeletal Research Center, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Preoperative Planning for Anatomic Total Shoulder Arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2022; 30:e1207-e1216. [PMID: 36135930 DOI: 10.5435/jaaos-d-21-01119] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2021] [Accepted: 05/08/2022] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
The success of total shoulder arthroplasty is dependent on both proper patient selection and restoration of the native anatomy. After proper patient selection, preoperative planning is essential to select implants that will allow the surgeon to properly restore soft-tissue tension and correct for deformity. Although it is possible to template implants with plain radiographs, these do not allow accurate measurements of the complex three-dimensional anatomy of the glenohumeral joint. CT can be used to further examine version of the glenoid and humerus, as well as humeral head subluxation. Three-dimensional reconstructions also allow for virtual implantation, resulting in a more reliable prediction of implant appearance. Commercial software is available that calculates parameters such as version; however, these have been shown to have variability when compared with measurements obtained by surgeons. Patient-specific instrumentation can also be obtained based on preoperative measurements; however, although it allowed for improved measurements when compared with two-dimensional imaging, there has been no difference in version error, inclination error, or positional offset of the glenoid implant when comparing patient-specific instrumentation with standard instrumentation. Intraoperative navigation can also be used to give real-time feedback on implant positioning; however, additional studies are needed to fully evaluate its benefit.
Collapse
|
19
|
Concordance of Preoperative 3D Templating in Stemless Anatomic Total Shoulder Arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2022; 30:e1269-e1278. [PMID: 36027052 DOI: 10.5435/jaaos-d-22-00309] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2022] [Accepted: 06/11/2022] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Recent advances in preoperative 3D templating software allow surgeons to plan implant size and position for stemless total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA). Whether these preoperative plans accurately reflect intraoperative decisions is yet unknown, and the purpose of this study was to evaluate concordance between planned and actual implant sizes in a series of patients undergoing stemless TSA. METHODS A retrospective cohort of consecutive, anatomic, stemless TSA cases performed by two surgeons between September 2019 and February 2021 was examined. Preoperative templated plans were collected using 3D planning software, and the sizes of planned glenoid, humeral head, and nucleus "stem" implants and other procedural data were recorded, along with sociodemographic information. These predicted parameters were compared with the implant sizes, and the concordance of these templated plans was quantified by direct comparison and bootstrapped simulations. RESULTS Fifty cases met inclusion criteria, among which perfect concordance across all three implants was observed in 11 cases (22%). The glenoid implant had the highest concordance (80%) relative to the humeral head and nucleus implants (38% and 60%, respectively), which was statistically significant ( P < 0.001). Planned humeral head implants were more often oversized relative to their actual implanted size. However, 84% of the planned humeral heads were within 1 diameter size; in addition, 98% of the planned glenoid implants were within one size and all were within 10 mm of the implanted glenoid backside radius. All nucleus implants were within one size. DISCUSSION Final implant sizes demonstrated variable concordance relative to preoperative plans, with glenoid implants having the highest accuracy and humeral heads having the highest variability. Multiple factors contributed to the varying concordances for the different implants, suggesting possible areas of improvement in this technology. These results may have implications for logistics, intraoperative efficiency, and overall cost and underscore the potential value of this technology. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level III.
Collapse
|
20
|
Kwak JM, Jeon IH, Kim H, Choi S, Lee H, Koh KH. Patient-specific instrumentation improves the reproducibility of preoperative planning for the positioning of baseplate components with reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: a comparative clinical study in 39 patients. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2022; 31:1488-1498. [PMID: 35041969 DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2021.12.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/11/2021] [Revised: 12/07/2021] [Accepted: 12/12/2021] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The application of patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) for reverse total shoulder replacement has been rapidly increasing, which could reduce errors in implant positioning. Although PSI theoretically holds promise, evidence of the accuracy and reliability of PSI in shoulder replacement surgery is limited. METHODS Thirty-nine shoulders that underwent reverse total shoulder arthroplasty were included in this study and categorized into two groups: the conventional (n = 20) and PSI (n = 19) groups. Screw (length and angle) and baseplate (version, inclination, translation, and rotation) positioning were calculated based on postoperative computed tomography images using a three-dimensional measurement tool. The difference between the values of the preoperative target and postoperative measurement was calculated to evaluate the reproducibility of preoperative planning. Screw involvement in the suprascapular and spinoglenoid notches was assessed. Thus, the correlation between the position of the baseplate and the screws was assessed. RESULTS The mean differences between the planned length and angle (anteroposterior and superoinferior angles) and postoperative measurement in the PSI group were significantly smaller than those in the conventional group. Similarly, the mean difference in baseplate rotation between the planned and postoperative measurements in the PSI group was significantly lower than that in the conventional group (4.5° vs 10.6°; P < .001). The spinoglenoid notch was involved in 10 cases in the conventional group and 2 cases in the PSI group, and this difference was significant (P = .014). Overall, the mean difference between the preoperative and postoperative version, inferior inclination, and rotation values for the baseplate position was significantly correlated with the values for screw position (length and angle). CONCLUSIONS PSI improves the reproducibility of preoperative planning for baseplate and screw positioning and reduces the risk of neurovascular injury in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jae-Man Kwak
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Uijeongbu Eulji Medical Center, College of Medicine, Eulji University, Uijeongbu, Republic of Korea
| | - In-Ho Jeon
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Hyojune Kim
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Eulji University Hospital, Daejeon, Republic of Korea
| | | | | | - Kyoung Hwan Koh
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
The Surgical Treatment of Osteoarthritis. LIFE (BASEL, SWITZERLAND) 2022; 12:life12070982. [PMID: 35888072 PMCID: PMC9319328 DOI: 10.3390/life12070982] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2022] [Revised: 06/20/2022] [Accepted: 06/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Osteoarthritis is a degenerative condition affecting the whole joint with the underlying bone, representing a major source of pain, disability, and socioeconomic cost worldwide. Age is considered the strongest risk factor, albeit abnormal biomechanics, morphology, congenital abnormality, deformity, malalignment, limb-length discrepancy, lifestyle, and injury may further increase the risk of the development and progression of osteoarthritis as well. Pain and loss of function are the main clinical features that lead to treatment. Although early manifestations of osteoarthritis are amenable to lifestyle modification, adequate pain management, and physical therapy, disease advancement frequently requires surgical treatment. The symptomatic progression of osteoarthritis with radiographical confirmation can be addressed either with arthroscopic interventions, (joint) preservation techniques, or bone fusion procedures, whereas (joint) replacement is preferentially reserved for severe and end-stage disease. The surgical treatment aims at alleviating pain and disability while restoring native biomechanics. Miscellaneous surgical techniques for addressing osteoarthritis exist. Advanced computer-integrated surgical concepts allow for patient personalization and optimization of surgical treatment. The scope of this article is to present an overview of the fundamentals of conventional surgical treatment options for osteoarthritis of the human skeleton, with emphasis on arthroscopy, preservation, arthrodesis, and replacement. Contemporary computer-assisted orthopaedic surgery concepts are further elucidated.
Collapse
|
22
|
Preuss FR, Day HK, Peebles AM, Mologne MS, Provencher MT. Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty for Treatment of Massive, Irreparable Rotator Cuff Tear. Arthrosc Tech 2022; 11:e1133-e1139. [PMID: 35782844 PMCID: PMC9244853 DOI: 10.1016/j.eats.2022.02.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2021] [Accepted: 02/09/2022] [Indexed: 02/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Massive tears of the rotator cuff can result in severe functional deficits due to loss of the axial force couple and effective fulcrum that the intact cuff normally provides. For massive, irreparable rotator cuff tears, especially in the setting of early to moderate degenerative changes, reverse total shoulder arthroplasty functions to modify the center of joint rotation, allowing the deltoid and intact components of the cuff to carry out shoulder function more effectively. Our preferred technique uses a standard open deltopectoral shoulder approach with a 3-dimensional glenoid baseplate model and a 135° prosthesis in an onlay configuration to reduce the risk of scapular notching and increase lateralization of the humerus.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fletcher R. Preuss
- University of California Los Angeles Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, U.S.A
| | - Hannah K. Day
- Steadman Philippon Research Institute, Vail, Colorado, U.S.A
| | | | | | - Matthew T. Provencher
- Steadman Philippon Research Institute, Vail, Colorado, U.S.A,The Steadman Clinic, Vail, Colorado, U.S.A,Address correspondence to CAPT Matthew T. Provencher, M.D., M.B.A., M.C., U.S.N.R. (ret.), The Steadman Clinic, 181 W Meadow Dr, Ste 400, Vail, CO 81657, U.S.A.
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Monroe EJ, Hardy R, Holmquist J, Brand JC. Obesity and Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med 2022; 15:180-186. [PMID: 35511332 DOI: 10.1007/s12178-022-09753-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Rates of obesity and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) in the USA have both escalated with time. Obese patients experience arthritis at higher rates than normal weight patients; therefore, these numbers go hand in hand. Obesity has been correlated with health comorbidities such as anxiety, cardiovascular disease, diabetes, and metabolic syndrome as well as poorer outcomes and higher complication rates following lower extremity arthroplasty. The current review investigates these comorbidities as they relate to obese patients undergoing rTSA. RECENT FINDINGS Functional outcomes are similar to normal weight counterparts. Although longer operative times and a large soft tissue envelope would intuitively predispose these patients to higher risk for infection or other complications, this has not been reliably demonstrated. Technical considerations and awareness of potential risks in the obese patient demographic may aid the surgeon in preoperative planning and counseling of their patient. Obese patients undergoing rTSA have been shown to have higher risks specifically for infection, revision, and medical complications; however, this has not been consistently demonstrated in the single surgeon series where, more often, no difference in these metrics has been found. Outcomes measures and satisfaction are reliably improved, even when considering superobese patients, and majority of studies find their improvements and absolute values to be in line with their normal weight counterparts. Thus, rTSA does not seem to carry the same level of adverse risk associated with lower joint arthroplasty but potential for higher risk still bears consideration when counseling obese patients. Attention to factors that may negatively affect prosthesis positioning may optimize retention rates and limit early failure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emily J Monroe
- Heartland Orthopedic Specialists, 111 17th Ave E, Ste 101, Alexandria, MN, 56308, USA.
| | - Richard Hardy
- Heartland Orthopedic Specialists, 111 17th Ave E, Ste 101, Alexandria, MN, 56308, USA
| | - James Holmquist
- Heartland Orthopedic Specialists, 111 17th Ave E, Ste 101, Alexandria, MN, 56308, USA
| | - Jefferson C Brand
- Heartland Orthopedic Specialists, 111 17th Ave E, Ste 101, Alexandria, MN, 56308, USA
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Abstract
The 3D printing technology is a relatively new procedure with a high potential, especially in the field of shoulder surgery. The 3D printing procedures are increasingly being developed and also gaining new users. Principally, 3D printing procedures can be applied preoperatively in planning the surgical procedure, patient clarification and in teaching; however, the technology is increasing being used intraoperatively. In addition to intraoperative visualization of the models, 3D printing permits the use of individual and specific instruments and implants. This allows the precise transfer of the preoperative planning to the surgical procedure. Inaccuracies are mainly caused by soft tissues. The 3D printing can be beneficial in the fields of arthroplasty, shoulder instability as well as orthopedic trauma. The literature shows promising results in relation to duration of surgery, blood loss and clinical results of the procedure. On the other hand, it is still unclear which indications warrant the use of 3D printing. Other aspects that raise questions are the time of planning, the production time and the additional cost that the use of 3D printing entails. Nonetheless, 3D printing represents a meaningful enhancement of the portfolio of surgeons, which becomes highly beneficial and useful in complex situations. Furthermore, this procedure enables a certain amount of flexibility when reacting to certain circumstances.
Collapse
|
25
|
Mohammad Sadeghi M, Kececi EF, Kapicioglu M, Aralasmak A, Tezgel O, Basaran MA, Yildiz F, Bilsel K. Three dimensional patient-specific guides for guide pin positioning in reverse shoulder arthroplasty: An experimental study on different glenoid types. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong) 2022; 30:10225536221079432. [PMID: 35220811 DOI: 10.1177/10225536221079432] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/03/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Incorrect positioning is one of the main factors for glenoid component loosening in reverse shoulder arthroplasty and component placement can be challenging. This study aimed to assess whether Patient-Specific Instrumentation (PSI) provides better guide pin positioning accuracy and is superior to standard guided and freehand instrumentation methods in cases of glenoid bone deformity. MATERIALS AND METHODS Based on the Walch classification, five different scapula types were acquired by computed tomography (CT). For each type, two different surgeons placed a guide pin into the scapula using three different methods: freehand method, conventional non-patient-specific guide, and PSI guide. Each method was repeated five times by both surgeons. In these experiments, a total of 150 samples of scapula models were used (5 × 2 × 3 × 5 = 150). Post-operative CT scans of the samples with the guide pin were digitally assessed and the accuracy of the pin placement was determined by comparison to the preoperative planning on a three-dimensional (3D) model. RESULTS The PSI method showed accuracies to the preoperative plan of 2.68 (SD 2.10) degrees for version angle (p < .05), 2.59 (SD 2.68) degrees for inclination angle (p < .05), and 1.55 (SD 1.26) mm for entry point offset (p < .05). The mean and standard deviation errors compared to planned values of version angle, inclination angle, and entry point offset were statistically significant for the PSI method for the type C defected glenoid and non-arthritic glenoid. CONCLUSION Using the PSI guide created by an image processing software tool for guide pin positioning showed advantages in glenoid component positioning over other methods, for defected and intact glenoid types, but correlation with clinical outcomes should be examined.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Emin Faruk Kececi
- Department of Mechanical Engineering Kayseri, 346448Abdullah Gul University, Kayseri, Turkey
| | - Mehmet Kapicioglu
- Orthopaedics and Traumatology Department, 221265Bezmialem Vakif University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Ayse Aralasmak
- Radiology Department, 469683Istinye University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Okan Tezgel
- Radiology Department, 469683Istinye University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Murat Alper Basaran
- Department of Management Engineering, 450199Alanya Alaaddin Keykubat University, Antalya, Turkey
| | - Fatih Yildiz
- Orthopaedics and Traumatology Department, 221265Bezmialem Vakif University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Kerem Bilsel
- Orthopaedics and Traumatology Department, 221265Bezmialem Vakif University, Istanbul, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
The Evolution of Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty-From the First Steps to Novel Implant Designs and Surgical Techniques. J Clin Med 2022; 11:jcm11061512. [PMID: 35329837 PMCID: PMC8949196 DOI: 10.3390/jcm11061512] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2021] [Revised: 03/06/2022] [Accepted: 03/08/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose of Review: The purpose of this review is to summarize recent literature regarding the latest design modifications and biomechanical evolutions of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty and their impact on postoperative outcomes. Recent findings: Over the past decade, worldwide implantation rates of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty have drastically increased for various shoulder pathologies. While Paul Grammont’s design principles first published in 1985 for reverse total shoulder arthroplasty remained unchanged, several adjustments were made to address postoperative clinical and biomechanical challenges such as implant glenoid loosening, scapular notching, or limited range of motion in order to maximize functional outcomes and increase the longevity of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. However, the adequate and stable fixation of prosthetic components can be challenging, especially in massive osteoarthritis with concomitant bone loss. To overcome such issues, surgical navigation and patient-specific instruments may be a viable tool to improve accurate prosthetic component positioning. Nevertheless, larger clinical series on the accuracy and possible complications of this novel technique are still missing.
Collapse
|
27
|
Variability and reliability of 2-dimensional vs. 3-dimensional glenoid version measurements with 3-dimensional preoperative planning software. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2022; 31:302-309. [PMID: 34411724 DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2021.07.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/15/2021] [Revised: 07/07/2021] [Accepted: 07/11/2021] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Preoperative planning for total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) may change according to the measured degree of glenoid version. Both 2-dimensional (2D) and 3-dimensional (3D) computed tomographic (CT) scans are used to measure glenoid version, with no consensus on which method is more accurate. However, it is generally accepted that 3D measurements are more reliable, yet most 3D reconstruction software currently in clinical use have never been directly compared to 2D. The purpose of this study is to directly compare 2D and 3D glenoid version measurements and determine the differences between the two. METHODS CT scans were performed preoperatively on 315 shoulders undergoing either anatomic or reverse TSA. 2D measurements of glenoid version were obtained manually using the Friedman method, whereas 3D measurements were obtained using the Equinoxe Planning Application (Exactech Inc.) 3D-reconstruction software. Negative version values indicate retroversion, whereas positive values indicate anteversion. Two observers collected the 2D measurements 2 separate times, and intra- and interobserver measurements were calculated. Groups were compared for variability using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs), and for differences in sample means using Student t tests. Additionally, samples were stratified by version value in order to better understand the potential sources of error between measurement techniques. RESULTS For the 2D measurements, intraobserver variability indicated excellent reproducibility for both observer 1 (ICC = 0.928, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.911-0.942) and observer 2 (ICC = 0.964, 95% CI 0.955-0.971). Interobserver variability measurements also indicated excellent reproducibility (ICC = 0.915, 95% CI 0.778-0.956). The overall 2D version measurement average (-4.9° ± 10.3°) was significantly less retroverted than the 3D measurement average (-8.4° ± 9.1°) (P < .001), with 3D measurements yielding a more retroverted value 73% of the time. When stratified on the basis of version value with outliers excluded, there was no significant difference in the distribution of high-error samples within the data. DISCUSSION There was excellent reproducibility between the 2 observers in terms of both intra- and interobserver variability. The 3D measurement techniques were significantly more likely to return a more retroverted measurement, and high-error samples were evenly distributed throughout the data, indicating that there were no discernable trends in the degree of error observed. Shoulder surgeons should be aware that different glenoid version measurement strategies can yield different version measurements, as these can affect preoperative planning and surgeon decision making.
Collapse
|
28
|
Aminov O, Regan W, Giles JW, Simon MJK, Hodgson AJ. Targeting repeatability of a less obtrusive surgical navigation procedure for total shoulder arthroplasty. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 2021; 17:283-293. [PMID: 34611779 DOI: 10.1007/s11548-021-02503-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/22/2021] [Accepted: 09/17/2021] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Surgical navigation systems have demonstrated improvements in alignment accuracy in a number of arthroplasty procedures, but they have not yet been widely adopted for use in total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA). We believe this is due in part to the obtrusiveness of conventional optical tracking systems, as well as the need for additional intraoperative steps such as calibration and registration. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the feasibility of adapting a less-intrusive dental navigation system for use in TSA. METHODS We developed a proof-of-concept system based on validated laser-engraved surgical tools recently introduced for use in dental surgery that are calibrated once when manufactured and not recalibrated at time of use. The design also features a notably smaller bone-mounted tracker that can be tracked from a wide range of viewing angles. To assess our system's performance, we modified the dental surgical software to support guidance of a TSA procedure. We then conducted a user study in which three participants with varying surgical experience used the system to drill 30 holes in a glenoid model. Using a coordinate measuring machine, we determined the resulting drilled trajectory and compared this to the pre-planned trajectory. Since we used a model glenoid rather than anatomical specimens, we report on targeting precision rather than overall procedure precision or accuracy. RESULTS We found targeting precision < 1 mm (standard deviation) for locating the entry hole and < ~ 1° (SD) for both version and inclination. The latter value was markedly lower than the end-to-end angular precision achieved by previously reported TSA navigation systems (approximately 3°-5° SD). CONCLUSION We conclude that variability during the targeting phase represents a small fraction of the overall variability exhibited by existing systems, so a less obtrusive navigation system for TSA based on laser-engraved tooling is likely feasible, which could improve the uptake rates of surgical navigation for TSA, thereby potentially leading to improved overall surgical outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Oded Aminov
- Biomedical Engineering, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
| | - William Regan
- Department of Orthopedics, UBC, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Joshua W Giles
- Mechanical Engineering, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC, Canada
| | - Maciej J K Simon
- Department of Orthopedics, UBC, Vancouver, BC, Canada.,Department of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein - Campus Kiel, Arnold-Heller-Str. 3, 24105, Kiel, Germany
| | - Antony J Hodgson
- Mechanical Engineering, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Jahic D, Suero EM, Marjanovic B. The Use of Computer Navigation and Patient Specific Instrumentation in Shoulder Arthroplasty: Everyday Practice, Just for Special Cases or Actually Teaching a Surgeon? Acta Inform Med 2021; 29:130-133. [PMID: 34584337 PMCID: PMC8443132 DOI: 10.5455/aim.2021.29.130-133] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/05/2021] [Accepted: 06/27/2021] [Indexed: 01/13/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: The use of computer assisted surgery, navigation (NAV) in shoulder arthroplasty is still under discussion, regarding the clinical outcome and prosthesis longevity, especially when combining these factors with cost, time and surgeon’s experience. Beside the NAV, there has been in use patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) as an additional tool for more precise glenoid implant position. Surgical NAV and PSI for glenoid implant positioning in anatomic and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty are in last years under observation and discussion. Objective: To critically review and evaluate the current literature regarding the use of computer navigation and PSI in shoulder arthroplasty. Methods: Critical review of the existing literature. Results: Cost-effectiveness, prosthesis longevity and revision arthroplasty rate have not yet been proven clinically. Moreover, heterogeneity is high in studies that include different positioning systems (NAV, PSI and standard instrumentation). Heterogeneity is due to differences in surgical technique, implants, surgeon’s expertise, radiographic image analysis technique. Conclusion: The use of navigation systems and PSI should be clinically proven in the shoulder arthroplasty. Independent experts’ opinion and independent high level studies lack at the moment. There will be still a lot of talk regarding this topic in future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dzenan Jahic
- Orthopaedics and Traumatology Clinic, University Clinical Center Sarajevo, Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina
| | - Eduardo M Suero
- Department of General Trauma and Reconstructive Surgery, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Benjamin Marjanovic
- Department for Arthroscopy and Sports Orthopaedics, Orthopaedic Hospital Valdoltra, Ankaran, Slovenia
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Levins JG, Kukreja M, Paxton ES, Green A. Computer-Assisted Preoperative Planning and Patient-Specific Instrumentation for Glenoid Implants in Shoulder Arthroplasty. JBJS Rev 2021; 9:01874474-202109000-00006. [PMID: 35417437 DOI: 10.2106/jbjs.rvw.20.00236] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
Abstract
» Glenoid component positioning affects implant survival after total shoulder arthroplasty, and accurate glenoid-component positioning is an important technical aspect. » The use of virtual planning and patient-specific instrumentation has been shown to produce reliable implant placement in the laboratory and in some clinical studies. » Currently available preoperative planning software programs employ different techniques to generate 3-dimensional models and produce anatomic measurements potentially affecting clinical decisions. » There are no published data, to our knowledge, on the effect of preoperative computer planning and patient-specific instrumentation on long-term clinical outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James G Levins
- Division of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Brown University Warren Alpert School of Medicine, Providence, Rhode Island
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
31
|
Kozak T, Bauer S, Walch G, Al-Karawi S, Blakeney W. An update on reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: current indications, new designs, same old problems. EFORT Open Rev 2021; 6:189-201. [PMID: 33841918 PMCID: PMC8025709 DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.6.200085] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) was originally developed because of unsatisfactory results with anatomic shoulder arthroplasty options for the majority of degenerative shoulder conditions and fractures. After initial concerns about RTSA longevity, indications were extended to primary osteoarthritis with glenoid deficiency, massive cuff tears in younger patients, fracture, tumour and failed anatomic total shoulder replacement. Traditional RTSA by Grammont has undergone a number of iterations such as glenoid lateralization, reduced neck-shaft angle, modular, stemless components and onlay systems. The incidence of complications such as dislocation, notching and acromial fractures has also evolved. Computer navigation, 3D planning and patient-specific implantation have been in use for several years and mixed-reality guided implantation is currently being trialled. Controversies in RTSA include lateralization, stemless humeral components, subscapularis repair and treatment of acromial fractures.
Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2021;6:189-201. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.6.200085
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas Kozak
- Albany Health Campus, Albany, Australia.,Royal Perth Hospital, Perth, Australia
| | - Stefan Bauer
- Ensemble Hospitalier de la Côte, Morges, Switzerland
| | - Gilles Walch
- Hôpital Privé Jean-Mermoz, Centre Orthopédique Santy, Lyon, France
| | | | - William Blakeney
- Albany Health Campus, Albany, Australia.,Royal Perth Hospital, Perth, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Computer-Assisted Surgery in Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty: Early Experience. Indian J Orthop 2021; 55:1003-1008. [PMID: 34194658 PMCID: PMC8192603 DOI: 10.1007/s43465-020-00344-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2020] [Accepted: 12/30/2020] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In the last decade, new technologies have been applied to shoulder arthroplasty. The aim of this work was to show that navigated RSA allows the surgeon to reach the planned version/inclination in all cases. In this article are shown preliminary data, advantages, disadvantages and limits of the technique. METHODS Eighteen computer-assisted reverse shoulder arthroplasty were performed. Preoperative glenoid version and inclination were evaluated with preoperative CT scan using Orthoblue® (Exactech, Gainesville, FL,USA) software, as well as baseplate type, planned glenoid component seating, planned postoperative version, planned postoperative inclination, intraoperative glenoid version/inclination, screw length and surgical time. A senior shoulder surgeon has analyzed the advantages, disadvantages and limitation of this kind of surgery. RESULTS Mean surgical time of the primary implants was 92 ± 12 min (min 75-max 110). Mean preoperative inclination was + 2.6° ± 6.4, mean preoperative version was - 7.6° ± 8.4. Mean planned postoperative inclination was - 2.7° ± 2.3, mean planned postoperative version was - 1.6° ± 2.9 and mean planned glenoid seating was 89% ± 8%. Planned settings were reached in all cases during surgery. Baseplate implanted were in nine cases 8° posterior augmented, in six cases standard and in three cases 10° superior augmented. Mean screw length was 33.5 mm ± 4.2 mm. No GPS system failure has been recorded. One coracoid fracture occurred during the first case. DISCUSSION Intraoperative navigation system is a reliable and user-friendly technology that allows the surgeon to reach planned glenoid positioning during surgery. Furthermore, this technology will allow the surgeon to compare clinical outcomes to component positioning data. The lack of humeral implant navigation is the main limit of this technique.
Collapse
|
33
|
Kriechling P, Roner S, Liebmann F, Casari F, Fürnstahl P, Wieser K. Augmented reality for base plate component placement in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: a feasibility study. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2021; 141:1447-1453. [PMID: 32715400 PMCID: PMC8354932 DOI: 10.1007/s00402-020-03542-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2020] [Accepted: 07/15/2020] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Accurate glenoid positioning in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) is important to achieve satisfying functional outcome and prosthesis longevity. Optimal component placement can be challenging, especially in severe glenoid deformities. The use of patient-specific instruments (PSI) and 3D computer-assisted optical tracking navigation (NAV) are already established methods to improve surgical precision. Augmented reality technology (AR) promises similar results at low cost and ease of use. With AR, the planned component placement can be superimposed to the surgical situs and shown directly in the operating field using a head mounted display. We introduce a new navigation technique using AR via head mounted display for surgical navigation in this feasibility study, aiming to improve and enhance the surgical planning. METHODS 3D surface models of ten human scapulae were printed from computed tomography (CT) data of cadaver scapulae. Guidewire positioning of the central back of the glenoid baseplate was planned with a dedicated computer software. A hologram of the planned guidewire with dynamic navigation was then projected onto the 3D-created models of the cadaver shoulders. The registration of the plan to the anatomy was realized by digitizing the glenoid surface and the base of the coracoid with optical tracking using a fiducial marker. After navigated placement of the central guidewires, another CT imaging was recorded, and the 3D model was superimposed with the preoperative planning to analyze the deviation from the planned and executed central guides trajectory and entry point. RESULTS The mean deviation of the ten placed guidewires from the planned trajectory was 2.7° ± 1.3° (95% CI 1.9°; 3.6°). The mean deviation to the planned entry point of the ten placed guidewires measured 2.3 mm ± 1.1 mm (95% CI 1.5 mm; 3.1 mm). CONCLUSION AR may be a promising new technology for highly precise surgical execution of 3D preoperative planning in RSA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Philipp Kriechling
- Department of Orthopedics, Balgrist University Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Simon Roner
- Department of Orthopedics, Balgrist University Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Florentin Liebmann
- Computer Assisted Research and Development Group, Balgrist University Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Fabio Casari
- Department of Orthopedics, Balgrist University Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Philipp Fürnstahl
- Computer Assisted Research and Development Group, Balgrist University Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Karl Wieser
- Department of Orthopedics, Balgrist University Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
He Y, Xiao LB, Zhai WT, Xu YL. Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis: Early Outcomes, Pitfalls, and Challenges. Orthop Surg 2020; 12:1380-1387. [PMID: 32803918 PMCID: PMC7670150 DOI: 10.1111/os.12769] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2020] [Revised: 06/28/2020] [Accepted: 07/09/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective To evaluate the early outcomes and risk factors of reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Methods A retrospective study was performed on RA patients who had undergone RSA between January 2016 and January 2018. Preoperative glenohumeral joint damage was evaluated according to two radiographic classification systems. The severity of joint damage was estimated using Larsen's method, while the Levigne‐Franceschi method was used to assess the type of destruction. Further, we recorded intra‐ and postoperative complications. Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) was used to assess the degree of shoulder pain while shoulder function was evaluated with the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) Shoulder Score. In addition, patients' subjective outcome and range of shoulder motion were recorded. Radiographs were taken and examined during the follow‐up period. Paired t‐test was used to determine the difference in measurement data between preoperative and the last follow‐up. VAS was analyzed using the Wilcoxon matched‐pairs signed‐rank test. Results A total of 14 patients with 14 shoulders were included. All the patients were female with an average age of 60.29 years (range, 49–71 years) at the time of surgery and an average RA disease duration of 24.57 years (range, 5–40 years). Seven of the 14 patients had a history of joint surgery related to RA. Meanwhile, 11 of the 14 shoulders showed glenoid bone defect, and eccentric reaming was performed intraoperatively to avoid base plate malposition. The mean follow‐up period for the 14 patients was 2.76 years (range, 2–4 years). The mean VAS decreased from a value of 5.71 ± 1.10 preoperatively to 1.36 ± 0.61 postoperatively (P < 0.001). On the contrary, the ASES score showed an increase from 33.93 ± 6.89 to 76.67 ± 5.23 (P < 0.001). An increase in active forward elevation, abduction, and external rotation with the arm in 90° of abduction from 85.71° ± 17.61°, 77.14° ± 19.43°, and 17.14° ± 10.97° to 126.43° ± 5.23°, 106.42° ± 11.72°, and 38.57° ± 14.57°, respectively, was observed (P < 0.001). Subjective outcome assessment showed that 13 of the 14 patients were very satisfied or satisfied with the operation, while one patient was uncertain due to co‐existing ipsilateral elbow lesion. Notably, one patient acquired a humeral periprosthetic fracture during the operation. In this study, no major complications such as periprosthetic joint infection and dislocation or implant loosening were observed. Further, no patients underwent revision for any reason at the end of the follow‐up. Conclusions RSA could achieve good early outcomes without high complication rates in patients with RA. Glenoid bone defects and adjacent joints involvement were common in this patient group, which might increase the risk of surgery and affect postoperative satisfaction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yong He
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Guanghua Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Lian-Bo Xiao
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Guanghua Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Wei-Tao Zhai
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Guanghua Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Yue-Lin Xu
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Guanghua Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, China
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Abstract
Virtual Reality (VR) in orthopedic surgery has significantly increased in popularity in the areas of preoperative planning, intraoperative usage, and for education and training; however, its utilization lags behind other surgical disciplines and industries. The use of VR in orthopedics is largely focused on education and is currently endorsed by North American and European training committees. The use of VR in shoulder and elbow surgery has varying levels of evidence, from I to IV, and typically involves educational randomized controlled trials. To date, however, the terms and definitions surrounding VR technology used in the literature are often redundant, confusing, or outdated. The purpose of this review, therefore, was to characterize previous uses of VR in shoulder and elbow surgery in preoperative, intraoperative, and educational domains including trauma and elective surgery. Secondary objectives were to provide recommendations for updated terminology of immersive VR (iVR) as well as provide a framework for standardized reporting of research surrounding iVR in shoulder and elbow surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ryan Lohre
- Department of Orthopaedics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Jon J P Warner
- The Harvard Shoulder Service, Massachusetts General Hospital, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - George S Athwal
- Roth McFarlane Hand and Upper Limb Center, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, ON, Canada
| | - Danny P Goel
- Department of Orthopaedics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|