First-line immune-checkpoint inhibitor plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis

Meta-analysis of PD-(L)1 inhibitor plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy as first-line treatment in extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Immunotherapy targeting programmed death 1(PD-1) and its ligand (PD-L1) has been successful in extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC). However, first-line PD-(L)1 inhibitor combined with chemotherapy (immunochemotherapy) versus chemotherapy has not been well studied.

METHODS

Randomized controlled trials had been searched from PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library until December 29, 2022. Randomized effect consistency models were applied for estimating the pooled hazard ratios (HRs) and odds ratios (ORs). Study outcomes included overall response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), 6-month and 1-year disease progression rate, 1-year and 2-year mortality rate, and Grade ≥3 adverse events (AEs).

RESULTS

Six eligible trials with 2600 ES-SCLC patients were included. Compared with chemotherapy, immunochemotherapy significantly improved ORR (OR 1.32, 95% CI 1.07-1.63; p = 0.01), PFS (HR 0.68, 95% CI 0.58-0.78; p < 0.001), and OS (HR 0.72, 96% CI 0.66-0.78, p < 0.001) without increasing Grade ≥3 AEs (p = 0.07). Compared with patients with chemotherapy, the 6-month disease progression rate was reduced by 0.39 (p = 0.01) and the 1-year disease progression rate was reduced by 0.75 (p < 0.001), the 1-year mortality rate was reduced by 0.33 (p < 0.001) and the 2-year mortality rate was reduced by 0.50 (p < 0.001) respectively in patients with immunochemotherapy. However, patients with brain metastases failed to prolong PFS and OS from immunochemotherapy (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Compared with chemotherapy, PD-(L)1 inhibitor plus chemotherapy as first-line treatment could improve the efficacy and prognosis of ES-SCLC patients without more serious side effects. However, more research is needed to validate these results.

Patterns of care for people with small cell lung cancer in Victoria, 2011-19: a retrospective, population-based registry data study

OBJECTIVES

To report stage-specific patterns of treatment and the influence of management and treatment type on survival rates for people newly diagnosed with small cell lung cancer (SCLC).

DESIGN

Cross-sectional patterns of care study; analysis of data prospectively collected for the Victorian Lung Cancer Registry (VLCR).

SETTING, PARTICIPANTS

All people diagnosed with SCLC in Victoria during 1 April 2011 - 18 December 2019.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Stage-specific management and treatment of people with SCLC; median survival time.

RESULTS

During 2011-19, 1006 people were diagnosed with SCLC (10.5% of all lung cancer diagnoses in Victoria); their median age was 69 years (interquartile range [IQR], 62-77 years), 429 were women (43%), and 921 were current or former smokers (92%). Clinical stage was defined for 896 people (89%; TNM stages I-III, 268 [30%]; TNM stage IV, 628 [70%]) and ECOG performance status at diagnosis for 663 (66%; 0 or 1, 489 [49%]; 2-4, 174 [17%]). The cases of 552 patients had been discussed at multidisciplinary meetings (55%), 377 people had received supportive care screening (37%), and 388 had been referred for palliative care (39%). Active treatment was received by 891 people (89%): chemotherapy, 843 (84%); radiotherapy, 460 (46%); chemotherapy and radiotherapy, 419 (42%); surgery, 23 (2%). Treatment had commenced within fourteen days of diagnosis for 632 of 875 patients (72%). Overall median survival time from diagnosis was 8.9 months (IQR, 4.2-16 months; stage I-III: 16.3 [IQR, 9.3-30] months; stage IV: 7.2 [IQR, 3.3-12] months). Multidisciplinary meeting presentation (hazard ratio [HR], 0.66; 95% CI, 0.58-0.77), multimodality treatment (HR, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.36-0.49), and chemotherapy within fourteen days of diagnosis (HR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.48-0.94) were each associated with lower mortality during follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Rates of supportive care screening, multidisciplinary meeting evaluation, and palliative care referral for people with SCLC could be improved. A national registry of SCLC-specific management and outcomes data could improve the quality and safety of care.

Efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors combined with chemotherapy as first-line treatment for extensive-stage small cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis based on mixed-effect models

Background

Extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) is a highly invasive and fatal disease with limited therapeutic options and poor prognosis. Our study aims to systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors combined with chemotherapy (ICIs+ChT) vs. chemotherapy alone (ChT) in the first-line treatment of ES-SCLC.

Methods

A literature search was performed for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) related to "ICIs+ChT" vs. "ChT" in the first-line treatment of ES-SCLC in PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, CNKI, and other databases. RevMan 5.4 software was used to perform meta-analyses with hazard ratio (HR) and relative risk (RR). SAS 9.4 software was applied to conduct a mixed-effect model meta-analysis of the survival outcomes and draw survival curves.

Results

A total of 2,638 patients with ES-SCLC from 6 RCTs were included, of which 1,341 patients received "ICIs+ChT" and 1,297 received ChT. Based on the meta-analysis results provided by the mixed-effect model, patients receiving the "ICIs+ChT" regimen had a significantly longer overall survival (OS, HR = 0.800, 95% CI = 0.731-0.876, P < 0.001) and progression-free survival (PFS, HR = 0.815, 95% CI = 0.757-0.878, P <0.001) in comparison to those receiving ChT only. Compared with ChT, "ICIs+ChT" did neither improve the objective response rate (ORR, RR = 1.06, 95% CI = 1.00-1.12, P = 0.06) nor did it improve the disease control rate (DCR, RR = 0.97, 95% CI = 0.92-1.03, P = 0.35). Although the incidence of grade 3 to 5 treatment-related adverse events (trAEs) in the "ICIs+ChT" subgroup did not increase (RR = 1.16, 95% CI = 0.97-1.39, P = 0.11), the incidence of grade 3 to 5 immune-related adverse events (irAEs) increased significantly (RR = 4.29, 95% CI = 1.73-10.61, P < 0.00001).

Conclusion

ICIs+ChT regimen could significantly prolong OS and PFS in patients with ES-SCLC compared with ChT alone. Although the incidence of irAEs in "ICIs+ChT" is higher than that in the "ChT" subgroup, the incidence of trAEs is similar within the two subgroups. ICIs combined with chemotherapy demonstrated a good choice as first-line treatment for ES-SCLC.

Systematic review registration

PROSPERO, identifier: CRD42022348496.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer brain metastases

ABSTRACT

Lung cancer has the highest risk of brain metastasis (BM) among all solid carcinomas. The emergence of BM has a significant impact on the selection of oncologic treatment for patients. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are the most promising treatment option for patients without druggable mutations and have been shown to improve survival in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) BM in clinical trials with good safety. Moreover, ICI has shown certain effects in NSCLC BM, and the overall intracranial efficacy is comparable to extracranial efficacy. However, a proportion of patients showed discordant responses in primary and metastatic lesions, suggesting that multiple mechanisms may exist underlying ICI activity in BM. According to studies pertaining to tumor immune microenvironments, ICIs may be capable of provoking immunity in situ. Meanwhile, systematic immune cells activated by ICIs can migrate into the central nervous system and exert antitumor effects. This review summarizes the present evidence for ICI treatment efficacy in NSCLC BM and proposes the possible mechanisms of ICI treatment for NSCLC BMs based on existing evidence.

Investigation of poor predictive factors in extensive stage small cell lung cancer under etoposide-platinum-atezolizumab treatment

BACKGROUND

The phase III trial IMpower133 showed that platinum and etoposide plus atezolizumab was associated with improved overall survival (OS) and progression free-survival (PFS) when compared to the placebo group in treatment-naïve extensive stage (ES) small cell lung cancer (SCLC). Due to superiority in clinical outcomes, combination immunotherapy plus chemotherapy have become mainstay treatment modalities as first-line treatment in ES-SCLC. Nevertheless, real-world data are still lacking and the search for potential biomarkers is essential. This study aimed to evaluate potential predictive biomarkers applicable in ES-SCLC under combination therapy.

METHODS

Patients with ES-SCLC under etoposide-platinum-atezolizumab enrolled from seven university hospitals affiliated to the Catholic University of Korea were evaluated. Pretreatment clinical parameters were evaluated for association with OS and PFS. Adverse events (AEs) during induction and maintenance phases were also evaluated. p-values below 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

A total of 41 patients were evaluated. Six-month survival was 68.6%. As best response to treatment, 26 (63.4%) showed partial response, nine (22.0%) showed stable disease, and four (9.8%) showed progressive disease. During the induction phase, grade I-II AEs occurred in 22 (53.7%) patients, and grade III-IV AEs occurred in 26 (63.4%) patients. During the maintenance phase, nine out of 25 (36.0%) patients experienced any grade AEs. In multivariate analysis for OS, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), c-reactive protein (CRP), and forced vital capacity (%) were significant factors. In multivariate analysis for PFS, sex, and LDH were significant.

CONCLUSION

In ES-SCLC under etoposide-platinum-atezolizumab, pretreatment CRP, LDH and FVC (%) were independent predictive factors.

Signal pathways and precision therapy of small-cell lung cancer

Small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) encounters up 15% of all lung cancers, and is characterized by a high rate of proliferation, a tendency for early metastasis and generally poor prognosis. Most of the patients present with distant metastatic disease at the time of clinical diagnosis, and only one-third are eligible for potentially curative treatment. Recently, investigations into the genomic make-up of SCLC show extensive chromosomal rearrangements, high mutational burden and loss-of-function mutations of several tumor suppressor genes. Although the clinical development of new treatments for SCLC has been limited in recent years, a better understanding of oncogenic driver alterations has found potential novel targets that might be suitable for therapeutic approaches. Currently, there are six types of potential treatable signaling pathways in SCLC, including signaling pathways targeting the cell cycle and DNA repair, tumor development, cell metabolism, epigenetic regulation, tumor immunity and angiogenesis. At this point, however, there is still a lack of understanding of their role in SCLC tumor biology and the promotion of cancer growth. Importantly optimizing drug targets, improving drug pharmacology, and identifying potential biomarkers are the main focus and further efforts are required to recognize patients who benefit most from novel therapies in development. This review will focus on the current learning on the signaling pathways, the status of immunotherapy, and targeted therapy in SCLC.

Efficacy of PD-1/PD-L1 Inhibitors versus Chemotherapy in Lung Cancer with Brain Metastases: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are widely used to treat local or metastatic lung cancer. However, the efficacy of ICI in patients with brain metastases (BM) from lung cancer is unknown. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of PD-1/PD-L1 ICIs compared with chemotherapy for patients with lung cancer with BM. Electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, The Cochrane Library, and Web of Science) were searched. The meta-analysis assessed overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) of the PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors axis and its relationship with pathological type, drug modality, and the treatment line number in patients with BM from lung cancer. We included 694 patients with BM from lung cancer from 11 randomized controlled trials. Statistical analysis showed that compared with chemotherapy, PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors could significantly prolong OS (hazard ratio (HR) = 0.75, 95%confidence interval (95%CI) = 0.51–0.99) and PFS (HR = 0.65, 95%CI = 0.51–0.80). In the subgroup analysis, ICIs plus chemotherapy improved PFS (HR = 0.60, 95%CI = 0.40–0.80), but not OS (HR = 0.75, 95%CI = 0.30–1.19). The efficacy of ICI monotherapy in patients with BM was significantly different between OS and PFS: OS pooled HR = 0.81 (95%CI = 0.57–1.05) and PFS = 0.78 (95%CI = 0.62–0.94). Among different pathological types, the OS pooled HR was 0.67 (95%CI = 0.39–0.95) for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and 0.94 (95%CI = 0.56–1.33) for small cell lung cancer (SCLC); the PFS pooled HR was 0.58 (95%CI = 0.39–0.76) for NSCLC and 0.79 (95%CI = 0.65–0.93) for SCLC. Subgroups analysis of treatment line showed that no advantage for OS with ICIs as first-line or subsequent-line therapy, whereas ICIs as first-line (HR = 0.63, 95%CI = 0.53–0.74) and second-line (HR = 0.62, 95%CI = 0.62–0.96) benefitted PFS. This meta-analysis implied that compared with chemotherapy, PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors significantly improved efficacy treatment of patients with BM from lung cancer. Further studies are needed to confirm the role of ICIs in different pathological types and drug treatment modalities.

Anlotinib plus platinum‐etoposide as a first‐line treatment for extensive‐stage small cell lung cancer: A single‐arm trial

Background

Anlotinib as a third‐line or beyond therapy for extensive‐stage small‐cell lung cancer (ES‐SCLC) was studied. This single‐arm phase II trial was to investigate the value of anlotinib plus platinum‐etoposide as first‐line treatment in ES SCLC.

Methods

The primary endpoint was progression‐free survival (PFS) and objective response rate (ORR). The secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), disease control rate (DCR), time to progression (TTP), duration of remission (DoR), and safety. The subgroups of preset liver metastasis and brain metastasis were analyzed.

Results

In 35 ES‐SCLC patients, the median PFS, ORR, DCR, and OS were 8.02 months [95% confidence interval (CI): 6.90–9.66], 85.71% (95% CI: 69.74–95.19), 94.29% (95% CI: 80.84–99.30), and 15.87 months (95% CI: 10.38–18.89), respectively. The median PFS in the liver metastasis and brain metastasis subgroups was 7.33 months (95% CI: 4.76–9.69) and 7.34 months (95% CI: 5.68–9.20), respectively. The most common AEs with grade 3–4 were hand–foot syndrome (17%), granulocytosis (17%), stomatitis (14%), hypertriglyceridemia (11%), hypercholesterolemia (11%), as well as nausea and vomiting (11%), and no grade 5 AEs were recorded.

Conclusions

Anlotinib combined with platinum‐etoposide provided an effective and safe therapy for patients with ES‐SCLC.

The efficacy and safety of anlotinib for subsequent line treatment of small cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Anlotinib is one of the tyrosine kinase inhibitors that exhibits promising anti-tumor effect in several cancers. However, the efficacy and safety of anlotinib in pre-treated small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is not well determined. Herein, we performed this meta-analysis to summarize the effectiveness and safety of anlotinib in the treatment of pre-treated SCLC.

METHODS

The databases, such as PubMed and Embase, were searched to identify eligible studies. Clinical studies reporting the efficacy and safety of anlotinib in the treatment of patients with pre-treated SCLC were included. The main endpoints were overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), overall response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and adverse events. The Review Manager 5.4 and STATA 14 statistical software were used to perform the meta-analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 13 studies were included, involving 779 patients with SCLC. The ORR and DCR for the anlotinib group were 0.21 (95%CI: 0.12- 0.31; p < 0.01) and 0.76 (95%CI: 0.69- 0.83; p < 0.01), respectively. The summarized PFS and OS for the anlotinib group were 3.46 (95%CI: 2.68-4.24), and 6.86 (95%CI: 5.79-7.93) months, respectively. Compared with control group, the PFS in the anlotinib group was significantly longer standard mean difference(SMD)=0.76, 95%CI: 0.11, 1.41; p = 0.02). In terms of safety, the most common grade 3 or higher adverse events in the anlotinib group were hypertension (9%; 95%CI: 6%-13%), hand-foot syndrome (6%; 95%CI: 2%-9%), and fatigue (4%; 95%CI: 2%-7%).

CONCLUSIONS

Anlotinib may be associated with favorable efficacy outcomes in pre-treated SCLC patients with acceptable safety.

Addition of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors to Chemotherapy vs Chemotherapy Alone as First-Line Treatment in Extensive-Stage Small-Cell Lung Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Introduction

The addition of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) to conventional chemotherapy (CT) as first-line treatment improves survival in extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC). The aim of this meta-analysis was to determine the relative efficacy of first-line ICIs compared with CT in patients with ES-SCLC.

Methods

Two independent reviewers extracted relevant data according to PRISMA guidelines and assessed the risk of bias using the Cochrane Collaboration's risk-of-bias tool. Meta-analysis was conducted using random-effects models to calculate an average effect size for overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and safety outcomes in the overall populations and clinically relevant subgroups.

Results

A literature search of PubMed and Embase was performed. Six randomized controlled clinical trials (IMpower133, CHECKMATE-451, CASPIAN, KEYNOTE-604, and phase II and III ipilimumab plus CT trials) with a total of 3757 patients were included. Compared with CT alone, ICIs plus CT showed a favourable effect on OS (hazard ratio [HR] 0.85; 95% confidence intervals [CI] 0.79–0.96) and PFS (HR 0.78; 95% CI 0.72–0.83) but a non-significant increase in the risk of experiencing any adverse event (relative risk, 1.05; 95% CI 0.99–1.11). The estimated HR for OS favoured ICI combinations in all planned subgroups according to age (< 65 years/≥ 65 years), sex (men/women), and ECOG performance status (0/1). Analysis by specific ICI revealed significant improvements in OS only for atezolizumab + CT (HR 1.36; 95% CI 1.09–1.69) and durvalumab + CT (HR 1.35; 95% CI 1.12–1.62) compared with CT alone.

Conclusion

Combining anti-programmed cell death ligand 1 antibodies with platinum/etoposide is a superior therapeutic approach compared to CT alone for the first-line treatment of patients with ES-SCLC.

Graphic abstract

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40487-021-00182-0.

The CD112R/CD112 axis: a breakthrough in cancer immunotherapy

The recent discovery of immune checkpoint inhibitors is a significant milestone in cancer immunotherapy research. However, some patients with primary or adaptive drug resistance might not benefit from the overall therapeutic potential of immunotherapy in oncology. Thus, it is becoming increasingly critical for oncologists to explore the availability of new immune checkpoint inhibitors. An emerging co-inhibitory receptor, CD112R (also called PVRIG), is most commonly expressed on natural killer (NK) and T cells. It binds to its ligand (CD112 or PVRL2/nectin-2) and inhibits the strength with which T cells and NK cells respond to cancer. Therefore, CD112R is being presented as a new immune checkpoint inhibitor with high potential in cancer immunotherapy. CD112 is easily detectable on antigen-presenting or tumor cells, and its high level of expression has been linked with tumor progression and poor outcomes in most cancer patients. This review explores the molecular and functional relationship between CD112R, TIGIT, CD96, and CD226 in T cell responses. In addition, this review comprehensively discusses the recent developments of CD112R/CD112 immune checkpoints in cancer immunotherapy and prognosis.

Chemotherapy or chemo-immunotherapy as first-line treatment for extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer - a meta-analysis

This meta-analysis investigated the clinical benefits of chemo-immunotherapy in extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC). Seven randomized controlled trials with a total of 2862 patients were analyzed. Compared with chemotherapy alone, chemo-immunotherapy provided a better progression-free survival (PFS) with a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.81, p < 0.00001, and overall survival (OS) with a HR of 0.82, p < 0.0001; however, the incidence of treatment-related adverse effects (TRAEs) was significantly increased. Subgroup analyses showed that good performance status, cisplatin-based chemotherapy, without brain metastases at baseline and non-Asian populations were associated with greater benefits in OS from chemo-immunotherapy. Chemo-immunotherapy demonstrated better PFS and OS compared with chemotherapy alone as first line treatment in ES-SCLC, but additional TRAEs should be closely monitored.

Novel Cytotoxic Chemotherapies in Small Cell Lung Carcinoma

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is one of the deadliest thoracic neoplasms, in part due to its fast doubling time and early metastatic spread. Historically, cytotoxic chemotherapy consisting of platinum-etoposide or anthracycline-based regimens has demonstrated a high response rate, but early chemoresistance leads to a poor prognosis in advanced SCLC. Only a fraction of patients with limited-disease can be cured by chemo-radiotherapy. Given the disappointing survival rates in advanced SCLC, new cytotoxic agents are eagerly awaited. Unfortunately, few novel chemotherapy drugs have been developed in the latest decades. This review describes the results and potential application in the clinical practice of novel chemotherapy agents for SCLC.