Paclitaxel–bevacizumab combination in advanced non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC): AVATAX, a retrospective multicentric study

Sequential treatment of anti-PD-L1 therapy prior to anti-VEGFR2 therapy contributes to more significant clinical benefits in non-small cell lung cancer

OBJECTIVE

Anti-angiogenic therapy and immune checkpoint blockade therapy are currently important treatments for non-small cell lung cancer. However, the combined use of the two therapies is controversial, and few studies have investigated the effects of different time sequences of the two therapies on treatment outcomes.

METHODS

The tumor-bearing mouse model was established and the mice were divided into four groups, including AA-ICB sequence group, ICB-AA sequence group, synchronization group and the control group. Immunohistochemistry was used to assess tumor microvessels and PD-L1 expression. Selected immune cell populations were evaluated using flow cytometry. Meta-analysis and clinical information were used to elucidate the clinical effects of administration sequence.

RESULTS

We found that anti-PD-L1 treatment followed by anti-VEGFR2 therapy exerts the best inhibitory effect on tumor growth. Different sequences of anti-angiogenic therapy and immune checkpoint blockade therapy resulted in different proportions of tumor microvessels and immune cell populations in the tumor microenvironment. We further revealed that the administration of anti-PD-L1 before anti-VEGFR brought more normalized tumor blood vessels and CD8+T cell infiltration and reduced immunosuppressive cells in the tumor microenvironment. Subsequent re-transplantation experiments confirmed the long-term benefits of this treatment strategy. The meta-analysis reinforced that immunotherapy prior to anti-angiogenic therapy or combination therapy have better therapeutic effects in advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

CONCLUSION

Our study demonstrated that the therapeutic effect of anti-angiogenic treatment after immune checkpoint therapy was superior to that of concurrent therapy, whereas anti-angiogenic therapy followed by immunotherapy did not bring more significant clinical benefits than independent monotherapy.

Long-term progression-free survival in non-small cell lung cancer patients: a spotlight on bevacizumab and its biosimilars

INTRODUCTION

In the era of immunotherapy, bevacizumab seems to be losing its place in NSCLC treatment algorithms. The aim of this work is to try to define the advantages and disadvantages of NSCLC treatment with bevacizumab in combination regimens.

AREAS COVERED

We conducted a literature search in PubMed and Google Scholar to review the most important topics regarding bevacizumab treatment in NSCLC, with or without driver mutations, including trials with checkpoint inhibitors. Special emphasis was placed on the analysis of data on the treatment of patients with CNS metastases.

EXPERT OPINION

Bevacizumab is an antiangiogenic compound whose addition to chemotherapy made the first major breakthrough in the treatment of NSCLC. However, for the last 10 years or so, the use of combination immunotherapy regimens has suppressed the use and acquisition of new knowledge about bevacizumab. Newer data are primarily related to the treatment of EGFR-positive NSCLC patients with bevacizumab, with only a few larger studies investigating the use of a combination of bevacizumab and checkpoint inhibitors. The basic task remains to define the place of bevacizumab in treatment algorithms.

[Chinese Expert Consensus on Second-line Treatment for Non-small Cell Lung Cancer with Negative Driver Gene Mutations]

For advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with negative driver gene mutations, chemotherapy has always been the standard treatment option, and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) provide other treatment option for these patients. At present, the first-line treatment can choose chemotherapy, anti-angiogenic drugs or immunotherapy. Although the initial treatment can achieve a certain clinical curative effect, disease progression or treatment failure is eventually unavoidable. The second-line and subsequent treatments have poor efficacy and more effective drugs are needed clinically. An expert panel of respiratory medicine, pathology and medical oncology organized by Expert Committee on Non-small Cell Lung Cancer of the Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology conducted an in-depth discussion on evidences of clinical studies for second-line treatment of NSCLC patients with negative driver gene mutations, aiming to provide guidances for Chinese clinicians in choosing second-line treatment for NSCLC patients with negative driver gene mutations.
.

Investigation of response of patients with non-small cell lung cancer to docetaxel (plus ramucirumab) therapy in second-line treatment

BACKGROUND

Several options for second-line therapy are available for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC); however, the optimal therapy remains unclear. Docetaxel (DTX) monotherapy and DTX plus ramucirumab (RAM) are the recommended second-line treatment options. However, the efficacy of these treatments remains unsatisfactory. The aim of this study was to identify the clinical characteristics of patients with NSCLC who respond to DTX or DTX + RAM and factors that predict response.

METHODS

Patients with NSCLC treated with DTX or DTX + RAM after second-line therapy were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were compared with those who responded or did not respond to the post-treatment efficacy assessment.

RESULTS

Of 53 patients, 12 (22.6%) had lung cancer that responded to DTX or DTX + RAM therapy (response group). Multivariate analysis identified the absence of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in the immediate prior therapy and a reduced dose of DTX after the second cycle as significant independent risk factors predicting nonresponse to DTX and DTX + RAM therapy in patients with NSCLC. The overall survival was significantly longer in the response group compared to the nonresponse group (p = 0.016).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that DTX and DTX + RAM therapies immediately after treatment with ICI-containing regimens as well as continuation of DTX without dose reduction after the second cycle may increase the response rate and prolong survival in patients with NSCLC.

Immunotherapy: an emerging modality to checkmate brain metastasis

The diagnosis of brain metastasis (BrM) has historically been a dooming diagnosis that is nothing less than a death sentence, with few treatment options for palliation or prolonging life. Among the few treatment options available, brain radiotherapy (RT) and surgical resection have been the backbone of therapy. Within the past couple of years, immunotherapy (IT), alone and in combination with traditional treatments, has emerged as a reckoning force to combat the spread of BrM and shrink tumor burden. This review compiles recent reports describing the potential role of IT in the treatment of BrM in various cancers. It also examines the impact of the tumor microenvironment of BrM on regulating the spread of cancer and the role IT can play in mitigating that spread. Lastly, this review also focuses on the future of IT and new clinical trials pushing the boundaries of IT in BrM.

Second-line treatment outcomes after progression from first-line chemotherapy plus immunotherapy in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer

INTRODUCTION

Chemotherapy plus immunotherapy is the standard of care for patients with metastatic NSCLC. No study has evaluated the outcomes of second-line chemotherapy treatments after progression following first-line chemo-immunotherapy.

METHOD

This multicenter retrospective study evaluated the efficacy of second line (2L) chemotherapies after progression under first-line (1L) chemo-immunotherapy, measured by overall survival (2L-OS) and progression free survival (2L-PFS).

RESULTS

A total of 124 patients were included. The mean age was 63.1 years, 30.6 % of the patients were female, 72.6 % had an adenocarcinoma and 43.5 % had a poor ECOG-performance status prior to 2L initiation. Sixty-four (52.0 %) patients were considered resistant to first line chemo-immunotherapy. (1L-PFS < 6 months). In 2L treatments, 57 (46.0 %) patients received taxane monotherapy, 25 (20.1 %) taxane plus anti-angiogenic, 12 (9.7 %) platinum-based chemotherapy and 30 (24.2 %) other chemotherapy. At a median follow-up of 8.3 months (95 %CI: 7.2-10.2), post initiation of 2L treatment, the median 2L-OS was 8.1 months (95 % CI: 6.4-12.7) and the median 2L-PFS was 2.9 months (95 %CI: 2.4-3.3). Overall, the 2L-objective response and 2L-disease control rates were 16.0 %, and 42.5 %, respectively. Taxane plus anti-angiogenic and platinum rechallenge achieved longest median 2L-OS: not reached (95 %CI: 5.8-NR) and 17.6 months (95 %CI 11.6-NR), respectively (p = 0.05). Patients resistant to the 1L treatment had inferior outcomes (2L-OS 5.1 months, 2L-PFS 2.3 months) compared with 1L responders (2L-OS 12.7 months, 2L-PFS 3.2 months).

CONCLUSION

In this real-life cohort, 2L chemotherapy achieved modest activity following progression under chemo-immunotherapy. 1L-resistant patients remained a refractory population, highlighting a need for new 2L strategies.

cGAS-dependent proinflammatory and immune homeostatic effects of the microtubule-targeting agent paclitaxel

Taxanes are Microtubule-Targeting Agents (MTAs) that exert potent anticancer activity by directly killing cancer cells. However, recent evidence suggests that they may also stimulate inflammation and anticancer adaptive immunity and that these actions strongly contribute to their therapeutic efficacy. Details on how Taxanes may modulate inflammation and anticancer immunity are, nevertheless, still missing. We show here that at very low doses the Taxane Paclitaxel (Pxl) indeed induces a potent proinflammatory response in various cancer cell types in a cyclic GMP-AMP (cGAMP) synthase (cGAS)- and Stimulator of Interferon Genes (STING)-dependent manner, leading to interferon (IFN) signaling. However, we find that Pxl treatment also strongly upregulates the expression of the immune checkpoint protein Programmed Death-Ligand 1 (PD-L1) in cancer cells, therefore, inducing an inhibitory response to adaptive immunity potentially attenuating anticancer immunity and therapeutic success. These observations provide a mechanistic explanation of why clinical benefit may derive from the combination of Pxl with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors (ICIs) and suggest that more accurately tailoring dosage and schedule of this combination therapy may provide benefit in the management of a larger number of cancer types and stages.