An update on treatment of penile cancer

Exploring the Multifactorial Landscape of Penile Cancer: A Comprehensive Analysis of Risk Factors

Penile cancer, while rare, is a critical public health issue due to its profound impact on patients and the complexities of its management. The disease's multifactorial etiology includes risk factors such as HPV infection, poor hygiene, smoking, genetic predispositions, and socioeconomic determinants. This article provides a comprehensive review and analysis of these diverse risk factors, aiming to enhance understanding of the disease's underlying causes. By elucidating these factors, the article seeks to inform and improve prevention strategies, early detection methods, and therapeutic interventions. A nuanced grasp of the multifactorial nature of penile cancer can enable healthcare professionals to develop more effective approaches to reducing incidence rates and improving patient outcomes.

New Therapeutic Horizons for Advanced or Metastatic Penile Cancer

Penile cancer is a rare malignancy with a poor prognosis. Studies with single-agent immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have demonstrated efficacy, but response rates are low. Studies combining ICIs with both chemotherapy and targeted therapy are ongoing. Up to 50% of penile cancer cases are associated with human papillomavirus (HPV). HPV-targeting therapies, such as HPV-targeting vaccines and T-cell receptor therapies, are an area of active investigation. Penile cancer cells also express cell surface antigens that may be targeted by the emerging class of antibody-drug conjugates.

Immune-based Therapies for Penile Cancer

This article reviews penile squamous cell carcinoma (PSCC), a rare genitourinary cancer that has been increasing in prevalence. It discusses emerging therapies, focusing on immunotherapy, vaccine therapy, and cell-based treatments, especially in the context of human papillomavirus-related PSCC. Factors influencing these therapies are discussed. These include the immune microenvironment, programmed cell death ligand-1 expression, and tumor immune cell infiltration. This article also highlights immune checkpoint inhibitors and related clinical trials. This review supports the use of personalized medicine in treating PSCC. It stresses the need for collaborative studies and data sharing to create specific treatment plans and achieve better outcomes.

High-risk human papilloma virus status & outcomes for penile squamous cell carcinoma: A single institution experience

OBJECTIVES

There is a paucity of data on North American cohorts of patients with penile squamous cell carcinoma (pSCC). Herein, we aimed to assess the sensitivity of various modalities to identify human papillomavirus (HPV) status, determine the prevalence of high-risk HPV-positivity, and evaluate the prognostic impact of relevant clinicopathologic variables.

METHODS

Patients with pSCC (n = 121) consecutively treated with partial/total penectomy (2000-2022) at a single institution were included. HPV status (based on immunohistochemistry [IHC], in situ hybridization [ISH], and panviral metagenomic sequencing [PMS]), histologic features, and outcomes were reviewed. Outcome events included death due to disease and progression.

RESULTS

The majority of patients were white (105/121, 86.8%). Thirty-seven (30.6%) were high-risk HPV-positive, and morphologic evaluation had a sensitivity of 97.3% (95% confidence interval [CI], 86.2-99.5) for predicting high-risk HPV status compared to IHC/ISH/PMS. Disease progression was more common among high-risk HPV-negative compared to high-risk HPV-positive patients (HR 2.74, CI 1.12-8.23, P = 0.03). Moreover, among high-risk HPV-negative patients, those with moderate-poorly differentiated tumors had increased disease-specific mortality (32.6%, CI 17.1-48.1) compared to those with well-differentiated tumors (0%). Among high-risk HPV-positive patients, those with basaloid morphology had lower disease-specific mortality (0% vs 14.4%, CI 0.0-33.1).

CONCLUSIONS

We demonstrate high-risk HPV-positivity in approximately one-third of patients with pSCC. Morphologic evaluation alone had a high sensitivity in correctly determining HPV status. Our results suggest that high-risk HPV status and morphologic features (differentiation in high-risk HPV-negative, and basaloid subtype in high-risk HPV-positive pSCC) may have prognostic value.

MR imaging of penile pathology and prostheses

Penile MRI is a vital yet underutilized diagnostic tool that provides detailed information crucial for managing various penile pathologies. Due to its infrequent use, many radiology trainees lack confidence in interpreting these exams. This article reviews the anatomy, key technical considerations, and interpretive pearls for penile trauma, Peyronie's disease, priapism, penile neoplasms, prosthesis evaluation, and a few miscellaneous conditions. Through illustrative case examples, this review aims to enhance the understanding and proficiency of radiologists in performing and interpreting penile MRI in these clinical scenarios.

Criteria and indicators to evaluate quality of care in genitourinary tumour boards

PURPOSE

Genitourinary (GU) multidisciplinary tumour boards (GUMTBs) are key components of patient care, as they might lead to changes in treatment plan, improved survival, and increased adherence to guidelines. However, there are no guidelines on how GUMTBs should operate or how to assess their quality of performance.

METHODS

A systematic literature review was conducted to identify criteria and indicators to evaluate quality in GUMTBs. A scientific committee-comprising 12 GU cancer specialists from seven disciplines-proposed a list of criteria and developed indicators, evaluated in two rounds of Delphi method. Appropriateness and utility of indicators were scored using a 9-point Likert scale. Consensus was defined as at least two-thirds of Delphi respondents selecting a score sub-category that encompassed the median score of the group.

RESULTS

Forty-five criteria were selected to evaluate the quality of GUMTBs covering five dimensions: organisation, personnel, protocol and documentation, resources, and interaction with patients. Then, 33 indicators were developed and evaluated in the first round of Delphi, leading to a selection of 26 indicators in two dimensions: function, governance and resources, and GUMTB sessions. In the second round, consensus was reached on the appropriateness of all 26 indicators and on the utility of 24 of them. Index cards for criteria and indicators were developed to be used in clinical practice.

CONCLUSIONS

Criteria and indicators were developed to evaluate the quality of GUMTBs, aiming to serve as a guide to improve quality of care and health outcomes in patients with GU cancer.

The combination of immune checkpoint inhibitors and antibody-drug conjugates in the treatment of urogenital tumors: a review insights from phase 2 and 3 studies

With the high incidence of urogenital tumors worldwide, urinary system tumors are among the top 10 most common tumors in men, with prostate cancer ranking first and bladder cancer fourth. Patients with resistant urogenital tumors often have poor prognosis. In recent years, researchers have discovered numerous specific cancer antigens, which has led to the development of several new anti-cancer drugs. Using protein analysis techniques, researchers developed immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and antibody-conjugated drugs (ADCs) for the treatment of advanced urogenital tumors. However, tumor resistance often leads to the failure of monotherapy. Therefore, clinical trials of the combination of ICIs and ADCs have been carried out in numerous centers around the world. This article reviewed phase 2 and 3 clinical studies of ICIs, ADCs, and their combination in the treatment of urogenital tumors to highlight safe and effective methods for selecting individualized therapeutic strategies for patients. ICIs activate the immune system, whereas ADCs link monoclonal antibodies to toxins, which can achieve a synergistic effect when the two drugs are combined. This synergistic effect provides multiple advantages for the treatment of urogenital tumors.

Efficacy of indocyanine green fluorescence-guided inguinal lymph node dissection for penile cancer: a randomised trial

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the safety and efficacy of indocyanine green (ICG) fluorescence-guided inguinal lymph node dissection (ILND) in patients with penile cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A prospective, single-blind, randomised controlled clinical trial (ChiCTR2100044584) was performed among patients with penile caner who underwent bilateral modified ILND at four centres in China between 1 April 2021 and 30 June 2022. Patients aged 18-80 years and diagnosed with squamous cell carcinomas were included. Each enrolled patient was randomly assigned to either ICG fluorescence-guided ILND by a laparoscopic or robot-assisted approach in one groin, with non-ICG fluorescence-guided ILND in the other groin acting as a control. The primary outcome was the number of retrieved ILNs. Secondary outcomes included complications according to the Clavien-Dindo classification and the ILN non-compliance (inadequate removal of ILNs) rate.

RESULTS

A total of 45 patients were included in the intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis, and the 42 who completed the entire study were included in the per protocol (PP) analysis. There were no ICG-related complications in any of the patients. The results of the ITT and PP analyses indicated that the total number of unilateral ILNs retrieved was higher on the ICG side than on the non-ICG side (mean 13 vs 9 ILNs, difference 4 ILNs [95% CI 2.7-4.4], P = 0.007), and the number of unilateral deep and superficial ILNs was higher on the ICG side. Furthermore, the LN non-compliance rate was lower on the ICG side than on the non-ICG side. Additionally, there was no significant difference in local complications in the groins between the two sides (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

An ICG fluorescence-guided ILND was safe for patients with penile cancer. This procedure can improve the number of ILNs retrieved and reduce the LN non-compliance rate without increased complications. ICG fluorescence-guided ILND is beneficial and recommended for selected patients with penile cancer.

Insights into the management of penile squamous cell carcinoma: from conventional approaches to emerging novel therapies

INTRODUCTION

Penile squamous cell carcinoma (PSCC), a rare genitourinary cancer, is associated with poor outcomes due to limited treatment effectiveness, especially in advanced stages.

AREAS COVERED

While chemotherapy and/or surgery remain the standard of care, emerging therapies like immunotherapy, targeted therapy, and human papillomavirus (HPV) directed therapies show promise. Key to advancing treatment is understanding the immune microenvironment to gain insights into tumor resistance mechanisms and potential therapeutic targets. The scarcity of data on PSCC is a major obstacle in advancing research for this rare cancer.

EXPERT OPINION

Future research should prioritize collaborative efforts across various research centers and countries. Enhancing data sharing and pooling resources can lead to a more comprehensive understanding of PSCC, ultimately supporting the development of precision medicine strategies tailored to this specific cancer type. This collaborative approach is essential for making significant strides in PSCC treatment and care.

Multimodal Therapy of Locally-Advanced Penile Cancer: A Case Report With Literature Review

Cancer of the penis is a rare tumor that occurs in the elderly. Because of its rarity, it is often not diagnosed early, and its treatment poses difficulties for practicing oncologists. We report the case of an elderly patient treated for locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the penis, with a review of the literature. A 71-year-old man, who had been complaining of pruritus on the penis two years ago, presented with an ulcerated lesion on the prepuce and the glans. A biopsy of the lesion with pathological study showed a SCC of the penis. Pelvic MRI showed tumor thickening centered on the glans of the penis, infiltrating the fascia and the spongy urethra with discrete upstream dilatation and bilateral inguinal adenomegaly. CT scan of the neck, chest, abdomen, and pelvis showed no secondary localizations. Treatment initially consisted of carcinological surgery by a partial penectomy with bilateral inguinal lymph node dissection. The tumor was therefore classified as pT3N3M0. A PET CT scan performed later was in favor of local and regional recurrence. Surgery was not feasible, so concomitant chemo-radiotherapy was indicated at a total dose of 70 Gy in 35 fractions of 2 Gy concomitantly with platinum-based chemotherapy, withgood evolution.

Multiplex Immunofluorescence Captures Progressive Immune Exhaustion with Advancing Penile Squamous Cell Cancer Stage

Penile squamous cell carcinoma (PSCC) is a rare and deadly malignancy. Therapeutic advances have been stifled by a poor understanding of disease biology. Specifically, the immune microenvironment is an underexplored component in PSCC and the activity of immune checkpoint inhibitors observed in a subset of patients suggests immune escape may play an important role in tumorigenesis. Herein, we explored for the first time the immune microenvironment of 57 men with PSCC and how it varies with the presence of human papillomavirus (HPV) infection and across tumor stages using multiplex immunofluorescence of key immune cell markers. We observed an increase in the density of immune effector cells in node-negative tumors and a progressive rise in inhibitory immune players such as type 2 macrophages and upregulation of the PD-L1 checkpoint in men with N1 and N2-3 disease. There were no differences in immune cell densities with HPV status.

Metastatic Penile Squamous Cell Carcinoma Responsive to Enfortumab Vedotin

Penile squamous cell carcinoma is a rare disease with very limited data to guide treatment decisions. In particular, there is minimal evidence for effective therapies in the metastatic setting. Here, we present a case of metastatic penile squamous cell carcinoma with response to the Nectin-4 inhibitor enfortumab-vedotin-ejfv (EV). EV was selected due to the evidence of the high expression of Nectin-4 in squamous cell carcinomas, including penile carcinoma. The patient had both radiographic and symptomatic improvement after two cycles of treatment, despite having been treated with multiple prior lines of traditional chemotherapy. This case provides support for the use of antibody-drug conjugates (ADC), including EV, in this disease with few other options in the advanced setting. Further studies examining Nectin-4 and ADCs in penile squamous cell carcinoma should be completed, as high-quality evidence is needed to guide treatment after initial progression for these patients.

The Utility of Salvage Radiotherapy for an Inoperable Inguinal Recurrence of Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Penis

Penile cancer is a rare genitourinary malignancy for which limited treatment options exist beyond primary surgical resection. Metastatic lymphadenopathy represents a particularly poor prognosis with a lack of literature to suggest the effectiveness of radiation or systemic therapies. Our case documents an inguinal recurrence of penile squamous cell carcinoma not amenable to surgical intervention demonstrating complete response to salvage radiotherapy in the palliative setting. These observations propose the need for further research around the utility of radiotherapy in the management of metastatic penile malignancies.

Development and validation of a predictive model for penile cancer based on the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results database and multi-center cases

PURPOSE

Penile cancer (PC) is a great impact on the quality of life and psychological status of patients. This study aimed to construct nomograms using data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database to predict overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) in patients with penile cancer (PC).

METHODS

Patients were divided into a training cohort (n = 634) and a validation cohort (n = 272) in a 7:3 ratio. Independent risk factors influencing the prognosis of PC were screened using univariate and multivariate Cox analyses, and models for predicting PC were developed. Data from 203 patients with PC in four tertiary hospitals in Gansu Province from 2012 to 2021 were externally validated.

RESULTS

Univariate analysis and multivariate analysis showed revealed that the OS-related factors were age, grade, T stage, N stage, M stage and tumor size (p < 0.05); the CSS-related factors were age, mode of surgery, T stage, N stage, M stage and tumor size (p < 0.05). The C-indices of the OS and CSS nomograms in the training cohort were 0.743 [95% confidence interval (CI) (0.714-0.772)] and 0.797 (0.762-0.832), respectively. The C-indices of the OS and CSS nomograms in the internal validation cohort were 0.735 (0.686-0.784) and 0.755 (0.688-0.822), respectively, and those in the external validation cohort were 0.801 (0.746-0.856) and 0.863 (0.812-0.914), respectively. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, calibration curves, and survival curves all demonstrated good predictive performance of the nomograms.

CONCLUSION

The nomograms for PC were developed using the SEER database. The accuracy and clinical usefulness of the model were validated through a combination of internal and external validations.

Different Mutational Landscapes in Human Papillomavirus-Induced and Human Papillomavirus-Independent Invasive Penile Squamous Cell Cancers

Penile squamous cell carcinomas (SCC) are rare cancers that arise after transforming human papillomavirus (HPV) infections or independent of HPV in the background of chronic dermatoses. Limited knowledge about genetic alterations driving penile carcinogenesis comes from studies of mainly small cohorts of typically mixed etiology. In this comparative genetic study of HPV-induced and HPV-independent invasive penile SCC of 156 patients from a single institution in a low-incidence country, hotspots of 50 cancer-relevant genes were analyzed with targeted next-generation sequencing. Seventy-nine of 156 SCC were classified as HPV induced, and 77 of 156 SCC arose independent of HPV. Only 28 (35%) of 79 HPV-induced penile SCC, but 69 (90%) of 77 HPV-independent SCC carried somatic gene mutations. PIK3CA, FGFR3, and FBXW7 mutations occurred in both groups in similar numbers as seen in other human cancers. In contrast, mutations in TP53 (44/77; 57%), CDKN2A (35/77; 45%), and HRAS (13/77; 17%) genes occurred with one exception of a HIV positive patient exclusively in HPV-independent SCC with a frequent co-occurrence of TP53 and CDKN2A mutations (28/77; 42%). Mutations in multiple genes occurred in 9 (11%) of 79 HPV-induced SCC versus 47 (62%) of 77 HPV-independent SCC (χ2; P < .001). More than one mutation per gene (multi hits) was characteristic for HPV-independent SCC in 14 (18%) of 77 compared with only 3 (4%) of 79 HPV-induced SCC (χ2; P < .001). The total number of mutations in HPV-induced penile SCC (47 mutations) was significantly lower than that in HPV-independent SCC (143 mutations; Welsh test; P < .001). The presence of somatic driver gene mutations did not correlate with the age of patients, histology, or tumor stage of the primary SCC in either etiologic group, suggesting that acquisition of driver gene mutations is an early event after invasion. This large cohort analysis identified characteristic differences in mutational landscapes for the 2 etiologies. While genetic mutations in tumor suppressor genes drive HPV-independent penile carcinogenesis, oncogenic action of E6 and E7 substitute for mutations in HPV-induced SCC. A subgroup of patients with advanced SCC may be candidates for targeted therapy and clinical trials, although the majority of advanced penile SCC remain a therapeutic challenge.

Selinexor demonstrates anti-tumor efficacy in paired patient-derived xenograft models and hydrogel-embedded histoculture drug sensitivity test of penile cancer

BACKGROUND

Penile cancer is a rare malignancy with a poor prognosis, even with various treatment options. Considering the little progress in the study of the pathogenesis and treatment of penile cancer because of the lack of models that mimic the biological properties of the tumor, we have developed a patient-derived xenograft (PDX) model and paired hydrogel-embedded histoculture drug sensitivity test (HDST) to screen for drugs that can inhibit tumors. The increased expression of XPO1, as a key nuclear export protein involved in the transport of various tumor suppressors and cell cycle regulatory proteins, is associated with the prognosis of a variety of tumors [World J Uroly 27(2):141-150, 2009]. Selinexor is an inhibitor of XPO1, which can treat cancers, such as multiple myeloma, gastric cancer, triple-negative breast cancer, and non-small cell carcinoma [Transl Androl Urol 6(5):785-790, 2017; OncoTargets Therapy 13:6405-6416, 2020]. However, whether XPO1 inhibition has a role in penile cancer remains unknown. Therefore, this article used the PDX and HDST models to investigate whether the inhibition of XPO1 has an effect on penile cancer and its underlying mechanism.

METHODS

We used penile cancer tumor tissues to construct a PDX model of penile cancer and paired PDXE model and confirmed the consistency of PDX tumor tissues in source patients. Then, we assessed the ability of Selinexor to inhibit penile cancer tissues in vivo using a PDX model and in vitro by HDST. We also examined the potential mechanism of XPO1 action on penile cancer by IHC and TUNEL. Finally, we assessed the safety of the drug treatment by H&E and biochemical blood analysis.

RESULTS

Result showed that the penile cancer PDX model and patient penile cancer tissues were clinically consistent in morphological characteristics and protein expression. In addition, Selinexor could inhibit tumor growth in PDX models and HDST. We found that P53, P21 expression was upregulated; Cyclin D1 expression was downregulated, and apoptosis of tumor cells was increased in the Selinexor-treated PDX model. Moreover, it had no significant effect on liver, kidney, and cardiac function.

CONCLUSION

The PDX model of penile cancer was a powerful tool for penile cancer research and new drug development. It showed that Selinexor can effectively inhibit penile cancer in vitro and in vivo. In addition, XPO1 may affect P53, P21, and Cyclin D1 expression to regulate the growth and apoptosis of penile carcinoma.

The Prognostic Role of Human Papillomavirus and p16 Status in Penile Squamous Cell Carcinoma-A Systematic Review

PSCC is a rare cancer, with approximately half of all cases related to HPV. While HPV and p16 IHC testing have proven their prognostic value for oropharyngeal cancer, this is not yet established for PSCC. The current level of evidence exploring the relation between PSCC and HPV is moderate, so we conducted a systematic review following PRISMA guidelines to evaluate the prognostic role of HPV and p16 IHC in PSCC clinical outcomes. We searched the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases and identified 34 relevant studies that met our inclusion criteria. Of these, 33 were retrospective cohort studies, and one was a cross-sectional study. Nine studies reported that HPV-positive and p16-positive PSCC had better overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). This study highlights the need for a meta-analysis to determine the role of routine HPV status or p16 staining testing as part of the initial diagnosis and staging of PSCC patients worldwide.

Therapeutic Approaches to Penile Cancer: Standards of Care and Recent Developments

Penile cancer is a rare malignancy, most commonly diagnosed in older men, associated with poor outcomes, dramatic decline in quality of life and sexual function. Squamous cell carcinoma is the most common histopathology of penile cancer, accounting for 95% of all cases. Localized, early-stage penile cancer can be effectively managed through penile-sparing techniques in many cases, though advanced stages of penile cancer carry a poor prognosis. Current innovative treatments are exploring the role of targeted therapy, HPV-directed therapy, immune checkpoint inhibitors and adoptive T-cell therapies in treatment and prevention of relapse of penile cancer. Clinical trials are investigating the potential of targeted therapies and immune checkpoint inhibitors in advanced penile cancer. This review examines the current management of penile cancer and highlights future directions in research and treatment.

Influence of Race/Ethnicity and Household Median Income on Penile Cancer Mortality

INTRODUCTION

Penile cancer, while relatively rare in developed nations, presents substantial disparities in outcomes among different demographic groups. Previous research has shown race/ethnicity and socioeconomic status, often proxied by household median income, to be critical determinants of health outcomes across various diseases.

OBJECTIVE

This study examines the association of race/ethnicity and household median income with survival among penile cancer patients in the United States.

METHODS

We utilized the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Registry to identify patients with a primary diagnosis of penile malignancies from 2000 to 2019. Our primary outcome of interest was the hazard of death following a diagnosis of penile cancer. We utilized the Cox regression model to explore the association between race/ethnicity and median household income and how this influences survival among these patients. We adjusted for patients' characteristics, disease stage at presentation, and treatment modalities.

RESULT

Of the 6,520 penile cancer patients identified, 5,242 (80.4%) had primary malignancies. The distribution of patients was as follows: 64.1% non-Hispanic Whites, 8.9% non-Hispanic Blacks, 20.8% Hispanics, and 6.2% from other racial/ethnic groups. The median diagnosis age was 66 years (interquartile range: 56-74). Survival rates at 5, 10, and 15 years showed racial disparities: 76.4%, 72.5%, and 69.7% for non-Hispanic Whites; 70.6%, 64.1%, and 61.1% for non-Hispanic Blacks; and 70.5%, 67.4%, and 65.6% for Hispanics. Multivariate Cox regression revealed worst survival for Black (HR=1.40; 95% CI=1.08-1.81, p=0.01) and Hispanic patients (HR=1.24; 95% CI=1.01-1.52, p=0.04). No association was found between median household income and survival. Interaction analysis indicated that the poorest Black men had worse outcomes than the poorest Whites did (HR=2.08; 95% CI=1.27-3.41, p=0.003).

CONCLUSION

Survival rates for non-Hispanic Black and Hispanic patients are significantly lower than those for non-Hispanic Whites. Furthermore, survival is worse for low-income Black patients than their White counterparts in the same income bracket.