1
|
Nurlaila I, Pambudi S. The evolvement of breast cancer therapies: What we have done and where all these head off. Saudi Med J 2024; 45:331-340. [PMID: 38657992 PMCID: PMC11147575 DOI: 10.15537/smj.2024.45.4.20230492] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/26/2024] Open
Abstract
Although, from a therapeutic standpoint, breast cancer (BC) is considerably well-characterized, it still leaves puzzling spots. The Her-2+/PR+/ER+ BC can benefit from the mainstays of anticancer therapy and immunotherapy and overall have a better prognosis. Triple-negative BC, due to the concomitant absence of Her-2/PR/ER receptors, is more challenging and necessitates different strategies. It has been learned that the mainstay anti-BC therapies were initially designed to demolish as many cancer cells as they possibly could. However, the number of reports on the adverse effects of these mainstay therapies has recently been increasing. It underpins efforts to reshape such therapies into much better and safer forms over time. Moreover, some current findings on the molecular markers, which are target-potential, have also shifted the paradigm from radical-to-local-yet-precise-approach to meet the need for a therapy platform that is less cytotoxic to normal cells yet efficiently kills cancer cells.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ika Nurlaila
- From the Department of Vaccine and Drugs, The National Research and Innovation Agency (BRIN), Banten, Indonesia.
| | - Sabar Pambudi
- From the Department of Vaccine and Drugs, The National Research and Innovation Agency (BRIN), Banten, Indonesia.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Verma S, Young S, Boldt G, Blanchette P, Lock M, Helou J, Raphael J. Immunotherapy and Radiation Therapy Sequencing in Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2024; 118:1422-1434. [PMID: 38195030 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2024.01.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2023] [Accepted: 01/01/2024] [Indexed: 01/11/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE In the past decade, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have emerged as a treatment option for metastatic breast cancer (BC). More recently, ICIs have been approved in the perioperative setting. This has led to clinical scenarios where radiation therapy (RT) is given concurrently with ICIs. On the other hand, moderate and ultrahypofractionated schedules of RT are being widely adopted in the adjuvant setting, in addition to an increased use of metastasis-directed therapy. Furthermore, RT can modulate the tumor microenvironment and induce a systemic response at nonirradiated sites, an "abscopal effect." The amplification of antitumor immune response is used as the rationale behind the concomitant use of ICIs and RT. To date, there is a lack of literature on the optimal sequence, timing, dose/fractionation schema, and treated RT volumes with ICIs in patients with BC, especially in the era of ultrahypofractionation. METHODS AND MATERIALS We conducted a systematic review to delineate the reported treatment details, safety, and efficacy of combining ICI and RT in patients with BC. PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane CENTRAL were searched between 2014 and 2023. Data were extracted to assess the details of ICIs/RT delivery, safety, and efficacy. RESULTS Of the 12 eligible studies, 9 involved patients with metastatic BC. Most studies were phase 1/2, had a small sample size (range, 8-28), and were heterogenous in patient population and reported outcomes. The combination was reported to be safe. We identified 1 study in the perioperative setting, which did a posthoc analysis of safety/efficacy of ICIs in the adjuvant setting with receipt and pattern of RT. CONCLUSIONS In conclusion, there are limited data on the dose, timing, fractionation, and volumes of RT in both the adjuvant and metastatic setting in BC. Ongoing/future trials should collect and report such data on RT details, whenever RT is used in combination with ICIs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Saurav Verma
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Oncology, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada; London Regional Cancer Program at London Health Sciences Centre, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Sympascho Young
- London Regional Cancer Program at London Health Sciences Centre, London, Ontario, Canada; Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Gabriel Boldt
- London Regional Cancer Program at London Health Sciences Centre, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Phillip Blanchette
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Oncology, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada; London Regional Cancer Program at London Health Sciences Centre, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Michael Lock
- London Regional Cancer Program at London Health Sciences Centre, London, Ontario, Canada; Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Joelle Helou
- London Regional Cancer Program at London Health Sciences Centre, London, Ontario, Canada; Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jacques Raphael
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Oncology, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada; London Regional Cancer Program at London Health Sciences Centre, London, Ontario, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|