Optimal early active mobilisation protocol after extensor tendon repairs in zones V and VI: A systematic review of literature

Effectiveness of a novel finger range-of-motion brace for extensor tendon injury: a report of 10 patients

BACKGROUND

Extensor tendon injuries require surgical repair, followed by rehabilitation to ensure optimal outcomes. Immobilization has been the cornerstone of postoperative management. However, immobilization after surgery frequently makes the finger stiffness, often resulting in reduced functionality and quality of life for patients. Recent studies indicate that early controlled motion can significantly improve outcomes, but safe early range of motion (ROM) exercise is a significant clinical challenge. This article aims to check the efficacy of the novel designed finger ROM brace for preventing finger stiffness for extensor tendon injuries with case series.

METHODS

A finger ROM brace was designed based on the natural finger movement. Like a real finger, there are two tiny hinge joints and three round-shape body components. The design aimed to be ergonomic dynamic splint assisting controlled motion to promote early motion, thus reducing tendon tension and preventing stiffness. Elastic resistant ROM exercise could be by inserting a silicone band into the groove on the components and free movement could be achieved by removing a silicone band.

RESULT

Between December 2022 and July 2023, 10 patients who underwent tenorrhaphy because of extensor tendon laceration were involved. Complete extensor tendon laceration was 3 patients, other seven patients had partial laceration of extensor tendons. Surgery was performed within 2 days of injury, and no infection was observed in all patients. After the extensor tendon was confirmed as healed state by ultrasound, the patients were permit the active exercise wearing finger ROM brace with a silicone band. Within 1-2 weeks after elastic resistant exercise, the patients could achieve free full ROM movement without any complication.

CONCLUSION

The novel finger ROM brace combines the advantages of dynamic splinting and under-actuated mechanisms to offer a comprehensive solution for preventing stiffness after extensor tendon suture. Future studies should focus on clinical trials to validate the efficacy and safety of this brace in a larger population.

Dorsal Translocation of the Flexor Pollicis Longus Tendon Following Pediatric Both Bone Forearm Fracture

Tendon entrapment is a rare complication of closed forearm fractures. A 16-year-old boy sustained a type 1 open both bone forearm fracture after falling from a skateboard. The injury was initially managed with irrigation, debridement, and flexible intramedullary nailing. Seven weeks after surgery, a flexion contracture of the ipsilateral thumb interphalangeal joint was noted. Subsequent hardware removal and hand therapy failed to improve thumb extension. The patient was taken to the operating room for planned tenolysis and possible tendon reconstruction. Intraoperatively, the flexor pollicis longus tendon was found to be wrapped around the radial shaft as an apparent complication of the initial procedure, which necessitated division and reconstruction of the tendon. To our knowledge, this is the first pediatric reported case of dorsal flexor pollicis longus tendon entrapment through the fracture site in a both bone forearm fracture requiring tendon reconstruction. This case highlights a unique surgical approach to a novel complication of pediatric both bone forearm fracture.

Relative Motion Extension Splint after Extensor Tendon Reconstruction

Recently, the wide-awake local anesthesia no tourniquet (WALANT) technique and relative motion extension (RME) splint changed practice in extensor tendon reconstruction and therapy. We wanted to share our approach for zones 5 to 8 extensor tendon management following the up-to-date developments. The impacts of surgery under WALANT and early active motion therapy with RME splinting were explained frankly and shown in several videos throughout the article.

Safety of immediate open traumatic extensor tendon repair performed at an emergency department minor procedure room

INTRODUCTION

The superficial location of the extensor tendons makes them particularly vulnerable to lacerations. Patients most commonly present to the emergency department (ED) after these injuries. We aimed to measure the safety of immediate surgical repair of traumatic open extensor tendon injuries in an ED minor procedure room (MPR) under local anesthesia, and the associated post-operative infection and complication rates.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated all patients undergoing traumatic open extensor tendon repairs in the ED MPR over a 3.75-years period. Data collected included demographic information, comorbidities, mechanism of injury, additional procedures performed, and post-operative complications. All patients were operated under local anesthesia by a hand surgery fellow aided by an ED technician.

RESULTS

Two hundred and forty eight patients (278 tendons) were treated for extensor tendon injuries during the study period. 220 patients (245 tendons) have complied with follow-up. No intra-procedural medical complications were encountered. The post-operative infection rate was 1.4%. The rate of other post-operative complications was not related to the number of tendons repaired, additional digit involvement, or if the nature of the injury was work-related.

CONCLUSIONS

In this cohort, traumatic extensor tendon repairs performed in an ED MPR were found to be medically safe and to associate with a low postoperative infection rate. As preoperative assessment is simple and practical, and limited medical personnel is utilized, this surgical setting may enable us to reduce medical costs.

Comparison of two relative motion extension approaches (RME with versus without an additional overnight orthosis) following zones V-VI extensor tendon repairs: A randomized equivalence trial

STUDY DESIGN

Multi--center randomized controlled trial with two intervention parallel groups. An equivalence trial.

INTRODUCTION

Relative motion extension (RME) orthoses are widely used in the postoperative management of finger extensor tendon repairs in zones V-VI. Variability in orthotic additions to the RME only (without a wrist orthosis) approach has not been verified in clinical studies.

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY

To examine if two RME only approaches (with or without an additional overnight wrist-hand-finger orthosis) yields clinically similar outcomes.

METHODS

Thirty-two adult (>18 years) participants (25 males, 7 females) were randomized to one of two intervention groups receiving either 1) a relative motion extension orthosis for day wear and an overnight wrist-hand-finger orthosis ('RME Day' group), or 2) a relative motion extension orthosis to be worn continuously ('RME 24-Hr' group); both groups for a period of four postoperative weeks.

RESULTS

Using a series of linear mixed models we found no differences between the intervention groups for the primary (ROM including TAM, TAM as a percentage of the contralateral side [%TAM], and Millers Criteria) and secondary outcome measures of grip strength, QuickDASH and PRWHE scores. The models did identify several covariates that are correlated with outcome measures. The covariate 'Age' influenced TAM (P = .006) and %TAM (P = .007), with increasing age correlating with less TAM and recovery of TAM compared to the contralateral digit. 'Sex' and 'Contralateral TAM' are also significant covariates for some outcomes.

DISCUSSION

With similar outcomes between both intervention groups, the decision to include an additional night orthosis should be individually tailored for patients rather than protocol-based. As the covariates of 'Age' and 'Sex' influenced outcomes, these should be considered in clinical practice.

CONCLUSIONS

A relative motion extension only approach with or without an additional overnight wrist-hand-finger orthosis yielded clinically similar results whilst allowing early functional hand use, without tendon rupture.

Systematic review: Zone IV extensor tendon early active mobilization programs

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review INTRODUCTION: Early active mobilization (EAM) of tendon repairs is preferred to immobilization or passive mobilization. Several EAM approaches are available to therapists; however, the most efficacious for use after zone IV extensor tendon repairs has not been established.

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY

To determine if an optimal EAM approach can be identified for use after zone IV extensor tendon repairs based on current available evidence.

METHODS

Database searching was undertaken on May 25, 2022 using MEDLINE, Embase, and Emcare with further citation searching of published systematic/scoping reviews and searching of the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry, ClinicalTrials.gov, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. Studies involving adults with repaired finger zone IV extensor tendons, managed with an EAM program, were included. Critical appraisal using the Structured Effectiveness Quality Evaluation Scale was performed.

RESULTS

Eleven studies were included, two were of moderate methodological quality, and the remainder was low. Two studies reported results specific to zone IV repairs. Most studies utilized relative motion extension (RME) programs; two utilized a Norwich program, and two other programs were described. High proportions of "good" and "excellent" range of motion (ROM) outcomes were reported. There were no tendon ruptures in the RME or Norwich programs; small numbers of ruptures were reported in other programs.

CONCLUSIONS

The included studies reported minimal data on outcomes specific to zone IV extensor tendon repairs. Most studies reported on the outcomes for RME programs which appeared to provide good ROM outcomes with low levels of complications. The evidence obtained in this review was insufficient to determine the optimal EAM program after zone IV extensor tendon repair. It is recommended that future research focus specifically on outcomes of zone IV extensor tendon repairs.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

I.

The use of exercise relative motion orthoses to improve proximal interphalangeal joint motion: A survey of Australian hand therapy practice

STUDY DESIGN

Cross-sectional online survey.

INTRODUCTION

Exercise relative motion (RM) orthoses are prescribed by hand therapists to improve finger motion but there is limited scientific evidence to guide practice.

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY

To describe Australian hand therapists' use of exercise RM orthoses to improve PIPJ motion, including trends in orthosis design, prescription, clinical conditions, and their opinions on orthosis benefits and limitations.

METHODS

870 Australian Hand Therapy Association members were sent an electronic survey that included multiple choice, Likert scale and open-ended questions under four subgroups: demographics, design trends, prescription, and therapist opinions. Data analysis consisted of predominantly descriptive statistics and verbatim transcription.

RESULTS

108 Australian therapists completed the survey, over a third with ≥ 20 years of clinical experience. Exercise RM orthoses were prescribed weekly to monthly (82%) for between 2-6 weeks duration (81%) and used during exercise and function (87%). The most common differential MCPJ position was 11-30° extension (98%) or flexion (92%). Four-finger designs were most common for border digits (OR ≥3.4). Exercise RM orthoses were more commonly used for active and extension deficits compared to passive (OR ≥3.7) and flexion deficits (OR ≥1.4), respectively. Clinicians agreed that the orthosis allowed functional hand use (94%), increased non-intentional exercise (98%), and was challenging to use with fluctuating oedema (60%).

DISCUSSION

This survey highlights notable clinical trends despite only reaching a small sample of Australian hand therapists. Exercise RM orthoses were frequently being used for active PIPJ extension and flexion deficits. A common MCPJ differential angle was reported, while the number of fingers incorporated into the design depended on the digit involved. Therapists' preferences mostly agreed with the limited available evidence.

CONCLUSION(S)

This limited survey identified common exercise RM orthosis fabrication and prescription trends amongst Australian therapists. These insights may inform future biomechanical and clinical research on this underexplored topic.

Are the outcomes of relative motion extension orthoses non-inferior and cost-effective compared with dynamic extension orthoses for management of zones V-VI finger extensor tendon repairs: A randomized controlled trial

INTRODUCTION

There is no comparative evidence for relative motion extension (RME) orthosis with dynamic wrist-hand-finger-orthosis (WHFO) management of zones V-VI extensor tendon repairs.

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY

To determine if RME with wrist-hand-orthosis (RME plus) is noninferior to dynamic WHFO for these zones in clinical outcomes.

STUDY DESIGN

Randomized controlled non-inferiority trial.

METHODS

Skilled hand therapists managed 37 participants (95% male; mean age 39 years, SD 18) with repaired zones V-VI extensor tendons randomized to RME plus (n = 19) or dynamic WHFO (n = 18). The primary outcome of percentage of total active motion (%TAM) and secondary outcomes of satisfaction, function, and quality of life were measured at week-6 and -12 postoperatively; percentage grip strength (%Grip), complication rates, and cost data at week-12. Following the intention-to-treat principle non-inferiority was assessed using linear regression analysis (5% significance) and adjusted for injury complexity factors with an analysis of costs performed.

RESULTS

RME plus was noninferior for %TAM at week-6 (adjusted estimates 2.5; 95% CI -9.0 to 14.0), %TAM at week-12 (0.3; -6.8 to 7.5), therapy satisfaction at week-6 and -12, and orthosis satisfaction, QuickDASH, and %Grip at week-12. Per protocol analysis yielded 2 tendon ruptures in the RME plus orthoses and 1 in the dynamic WHFO. There were no differences in health system and societal cost, or quality-adjusted life years.

DISCUSSION

RME plus orthosis wearers had greater injury complexity than those in dynamic WHFOs, with overall rupture rate for both groups comparatively more than reported by others; however, percentage %TAM was comparable. The number of participants needed was underestimated, so risk of chance findings should be considered.

CONCLUSIONS

RME plus management of finger zones V-VI extensor tendon repairs is non-inferior to dynamic WHFO in %TAM, therapy and orthotic satisfaction, QuickDASH, and %Grip. Major costs associated with this injury are related to lost work time.

Relative motion orthoses for early active motion after finger extensor and flexor tendon repairs: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

The relative motion (RM) orthosis was introduced over 40 years ago for extensor tendon rehabilitation and more recently applied to flexor tendon repairs.

PURPOSE

We systematically reviewed the evidence for RM orthoses following surgical repair of finger extensor and flexor tendon injuries including indications for use, configuration and schedule of orthosis wear, and clinical outcomes.

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review.

METHODS

A PRISMA-compliant systematic review searched eight databases and five trial registries, from database inception to January 7, 2022. The protocol was registered prospectively (CRD42020211579). We identified studies describing patients undergoing rehabilitation using RM orthoses after surgical repair of acute tendon injuries of the finger and hand.

RESULTS

For extensor tendon repairs, ten studies, one trial registry and five conference abstracts met inclusion criteria, reporting outcomes of 521 patients with injuries in zones IV-VII. Miller's criteria were predominantly used to report range of motion; with 89.6% and 86.9% reporting good or excellent outcomes for extension lag and flexion deficit, respectively. For flexor tendon repairs, one retrospective case series was included reporting outcomes in eight patients following zones I-II repairs. Mean total active motion was 86%. No tendon ruptures were reported due to the orthosis not protecting the repair for either the RME or RMF approaches.

DISCUSSION

Variation was seen in use of RME plus or only, use of night orthoses and orthotic wear schedules, which may be the result of evolution of the RM approach. Since Hirth et al's 2016 scoping review, there are five additional studies, including two RCTs reporting the use of the RM orthosis in extensor tendon rehabilitation.

CONCLUSIONS

There is now good evidence that the RM approach is safe in zones V-VI extensor tendon repairs. Limited evidence currently exists for zones IV and VII extensor and for flexor tendon repairs. Further high-quality clinical studies are needed to demonstrate its safety and efficacy.

Hand Transplants, Daily Functioning, and the Human Capacity for Limb Regeneration

Unlike some of our invertebrate and vertebrate cousins with the capacity to regenerate limbs after traumatic loss, humans do not have the ability to regrow arms or legs lost to injury or disease. For the millions of people worldwide who have lost a limb after birth, the primary route to regaining function and minimizing future complications is via rehabilitation, prosthetic devices, assistive aids, health system robustness, and social safety net structures. The majority of limbs lost are lower limbs (legs), with diabetes and vascular disorders being significant causal contributors. Upper limbs (arms) are lost primarily because of trauma; digits and hands are the most common levels of loss. Even if much of the arm remains intact, upper limb amputation significantly impacts function, largely due to the loss of the hand. Human hands are marvels of evolution and permit a dexterity that enables a wide variety of function not readily replaced by devices. It is not surprising, therefore, for some individuals, dissatisfaction with available prosthetic options coupled with remarkable advances in hand surgery techniques is resulting in patients undertaking the rigors of a hand transplantation. While not “regeneration” in the sense of the enviable ability with which Axolotls can replace a lost limb, hand transplants do require significant regeneration of tissues and nerves. Regaining sophisticated hand functions also depends on “reconnecting” the donated hand with the areas of the human brain responsible for the sensory and motor processing required for complex actions. Human hand transplants are not without controversy and raise interesting challenges regarding the human regenerative capacity and the status of transplants for enabling function. More investigation is needed to address medical and ethical questions prior to expansion of hand transplants to a wider patient population.

Relative motion extension management of zones V and VI extensor tendon repairs: Does international practice align with the current evidence?

STUDY DESIGN

Electronic Web-based survey.

INTRODUCTION

Therapists participating in an international survey selected relative motion extension (RME) as the "most used" approach for the postoperative management of zones V and VI extensor tendon repairs. A subgroup of respondents identified RME as their preferred approach and were asked about their routine RME practices.

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY

The purpose of this study was to capture data from routine RME users about their practices and compare this with the RME evidence.

METHODS

An English-language survey was distributed to 36 International Federation of Societies for Hand Therapy full-member countries. Participation required therapists to have postsurgically managed at least one extensor tendon repair within the previous year. Those who selected RME as their "most used" approach were asked to identify which variation of the RME approach they favored: RME plus (with wrist orthosis), RME only, or "both" RME plus and RME only, and then were directed to additional questions related to their choice.

RESULTS

Respondents from 28 International Federation of Societies for Hand Therapy full-member countries completed the survey. RME users (N = 368; 41.5% of sample) contributed to this secondary data. Respondents favored the RME variation "RME plus" (47%), followed by "both" (44%), then "RME only" (9%) with most managing single digit/simple injuries (n = 287, 81%) versus multiple digit/complex injuries (n = 96, 27%), and partial repairs (n = 278, 79%).

DISCUSSION

Practices not aligning with limited level II-IV evidence includes half of RME only users not adding/substituting an overnight orthosis; use of RME plus versus RME only for both repairs of independent extensor tendons and repairs proximal to the juncturae tendinum; fabrication of three not four-finger orthotic design; and restricting use to only repairs of one or two fingers.

CONCLUSIONS

RME plus and RME only are used interchangeably depending on surgeon preferences and patient/tendon factors. Compared with RME plus, from this survey, it appears that the RME only approach yields similar uncomplicated, early return of motion and hand function.

Postoperative hand therapy management of zones V and VI extensor tendon repairs of the fingers: An international inquiry of current practice

STUDY DESIGN

Electronic Web-based survey.

INTRODUCTION

Evidence supports early motion over immobilization for postoperative extensor tendon repair management. Various early motion programs and orthoses are used, with no single approach recognized as superior. It remains unknown if and how early motion is used by hand therapists worldwide.

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY

The purpose of this study was to determine if there is a preferred approach and identify practice patterns for constituents of International Federation of Societies for Hand Therapy full-member countries.

METHODS

Participation in this English-language survey required respondents to have postoperatively managed at least one extensor tendon repair within the previous year. Approaches surveyed included programs of immobilization, early passive (EPM), and early active (EAM) with motion delivered by resting hand, dynamic, palmar/interphalangeal joints (IPJs) free, or relative motion extension (RME) orthoses. Survey flow depended on the respondent's answer to their "most used" approach in the previous year.

RESULTS

There were 992 individual responses from 28 International Federation of Societies for Hand Therapy member countries including 887 eligible responses with an 81% completion rate. The order of most used program was EAM (83%), EPM (8%), and immobilization (7%). The two most used orthoses for delivery of EAM were RME (43%) and palmar/IPJs free (25%). The RME orthosis was preferred for earlier recovery of hand function and motion. Barriers to therapists wanting to use the RME/EAM approach related to preference of surgeon (70%) and clinic (24%).

DISCUSSION

In practice, many therapists select from multiple approaches to manage zone V and VI extensor tendon repairs. Therapists believed TAM achieved with the RME/EAM approach was superior to the other approaches. Contrary to the literature, in practice, many therapists modify forearm-based palmar/IPJs free orthosis to exclude the wrist to manage this diagnosis.

CONCLUSIONS

The RME/EAM approach was identified as the favored approach. Practice patterns and evidence did not always align.

A randomized clinical trial comparing early active motion programs: Earlier hand function, TAM, and orthotic satisfaction with a relative motion extension program for zones V and VI extensor tendon repairs

STUDY DESIGN

Randomized clinical trial with parallel groups.

INTRODUCTION

Early active mobilization programs are used after zones V and VI extensor tendon repairs; two programs used are relative motion extension (RME) orthosis and controlled active motion (CAM). Although no comparative studies exist, use of the RME orthosis has been reported to support earlier hand function.

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY

This randomized clinical trial investigated whether patients managed with an RME program would recover hand function earlier postoperatively than those managed with a CAM program.

METHODS

Forty-two participants with zones V-VI extensor tendon repairs were randomized into either a CAM or RME program. The Sollerman Hand Function Test (SHFT) was the primary outcome measure of hand function. Days to return to work, QuickDASH (Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Hand) questionnaire, total active motion (TAM), grip strength, and patient satisfaction were the secondary measures of outcome.

RESULTS

The RME group demonstrated better results at four weeks for the SHFT score (P = .0073; 95% CI: -10.9, -1.8), QuickDASH score (P = .05; 95% CI: -0.05, 19.5), and TAM (P = .008; 95% CI: -65.4, -10.6). Days to return to work were similar between groups (P = .77; 95% CI: -28.1, 36.1). RME participants were more satisfied with the orthosis (P < .0001; 95% CI: 3.5, 8.4). No tendon ruptures occurred.

DISCUSSION

Participants managed using an RME program, and RME finger orthosis demonstrated significantly better early hand function, TAM, and orthosis satisfaction than those managed by the CAM program using a static wrist-hand-finger orthosis. This is likely due to the less restrictive design of the RME orthosis.

CONCLUSIONS

The RME program supports safe earlier recovery of hand function and motion when compared to a CAM program following repair of zones V and VI extensor tendons.

[Extensor tendon injuries of fingers in the region of the metacarpophalangeal joint (zone V)]

Due to the exposed situation of the extension side of the metacarpophalangeal joint when the fingers are bent, injuries in this region are not uncommon. The extensor apparatus lies directly below the skin and the various parts can be easily injured. Due to the complex anatomical structure, the different clinical appearances and the various forms of treatment, injuries of the extensor tendons in the region of the metacarpophalangeal joint must be examined in a very differentiated manner. The not uncommonly occurring deviation phenomenon makes all injuries in zone V suspicious and special attention must be paid to them. The alarming multitude of revision surgeries with tenolysis, arthrolysis and restoration of the balance of extensor tendons or centering show that these operations are much more demanding than the way they are appreciated in the literature and by many surgeons (beginner's operation). The article presents the surgical treatment with suture techniques and reconstruction possibilities as well as the aftercare, in addition to the special anatomy and diagnostics.

Application of Hand Therapy Extensor Tendon Protocol to Toe Extensor Tendon Rehabilitation

An innovative application of a hand extensor tendon repair protocol was applied by the hand therapy service to toe extensors when the hand surgery service was called in to repair toe extensor lacerations.