Ustekinumab in the treatment of psoriatic arthritis: latest findings and clinical potential

Phase 3, multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study of ustekinumab in Japanese patients with active polymyositis and dermatomyositis who have not adequately responded to one or more standard-of-care treatments

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of ustekinumab (UST) in a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in adult Japanese patients with active polymyositis (PM) and dermatomyositis (DM).

METHODS

Fifty-one Japanese adults diagnosed with active PM/DM who did not respond adequately to one or more standard-of-care treatments were randomised 1:1 to receive UST (n=25) or placebo (n=26). Participants received body weight-range based intravenous administration of UST (6 mg/kg) or placebo at week 0 followed by 90 mg subcutaneous (SC) administration of UST or placebo every 8 weeks from week 8 to week 24. At week 24, placebo group crossed over to receive body weight-range based intravenous administration of UST, and thereafter, all participants received/were to receive SC administration of UST 90 mg every 8 weeks (week 32 through to week 72). The primary efficacy endpoint was the proportion of participants who achieved minimal improvement (≥20) in the International Myositis Assessment and Clinical Studies Total Improvement Score (IMACS TIS) at week 24.

RESULTS

No statistically significant difference was seen in the proportion of participants who achieved minimal improvement (≥20) in IMACS TIS at week 24 between the treatment groups (UST 64.0% vs placebo 61.5%, p=0.94) based on the primary estimand of the primary endpoint analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

UST was safe and well tolerated but did not meet the primary efficacy endpoint in adult Japanese participants with active PM/DM based on the primary analysis at week 24 in the study.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT03981744.

Discovery of CLEC2B as a diagnostic biomarker and screening of celastrol as a candidate drug for psoriatic arthritis through bioinformatics analysis

BACKGROUND

Psoriatic arthritis (PSA) is a chronic, immune-mediated inflammatory joint disease that is liked to mortality due to cardiovascular disease. Diagnostic markers and effective therapeutic options for PSA remain limited due to the lack of understanding of the pathogenesis. We aimed to identify potential diagnostic markers and screen the therapeutic compounds for PSA based on bioinformatics analysis.

METHODS

Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) of PSA were identified from the GSE61281 dataset. WGCNA was used to identify PSA-related modules and prognostic biomarkers. Clinical samples were collected to validate the expression of the diagnostic gene. These DEGs were subjected to the CMap database for the identification of therapeutic candidates for PSA. Potential pathways and targets for drug candidates to treat PSA were predicted using Network Pharmacology. Molecular docking techniques were used to validate key targets.

RESULTS

CLEC2B was identified as a diagnostic marker for PSA patients (AUC > 0.8) and was significantly upregulated in blood samples. In addition, celastrol was identified as a candidate drug for PSA. Subsequently, the network pharmacology approach identified four core targets (IL6, TNF, GAPDH, and AKT1) of celastrol and revealed that celastrol could treat PSA by modulating inflammatory-related pathways. Finally, molecular docking demonstrated stable binding of celastrol to four core targets in the treatment of PSA. Animal experiments indicated celastrol alleviated inflammatory response in the mannan-induced PSA.

CONCLUSION

CLEC2B was a diagnostic marker for PSA patients. Celastrol was identified as a potential therapeutic drug for PSA via regulating immunity and inflammation.

Expression of genes related to inflammation - IL-6, IL-8, and IFN-γ in monitoring ustekinumab therapy: preliminary results

Introduction

Psoriasis is classified as an inflammatory and autoimmune disease. Changes in the concentration profile of some cytokines, such as interleukin-12 (IL-12), IL-23, and IL-17, play a key role in its pathogenesis. IL-6, IL-8 and interferon- γ (IFN-γ) are also hallmark cytokines in a psoriatic cytokine network. Cytokine-blocking drugs, which are a part of the inflammatory cascade, are now increasingly popular. One of them is ustekinumab, directed against IL-12 and IL-23, but also indirectly against other interleukins, which take part in the inflammatory reaction. Due to the complexity of inflammation pathways, new molecular markers are still being sought. Regardless of the type of therapy used, they allow to determine its effectiveness, signal the lack or loss of sensitivity to treatment.

Aim

To evaluate the expression profile of genes related to the inflammatory reaction - IL-6, IL-8, and IFN-γ - in patients with psoriasis, depending on the duration of ustekinumab therapy.

Material and methods

The material for the study was the PBMCs of 14 patients suffering from psoriasis who were treated with ustekinumab. Monitoring was performed after 16, 28, and 40 weeks of therapy. The gene expression of IL-6, IL-8, and IFN-γ was measured using the RT-qPCR method.

Results

There was a statistically significant increase in the expression of IL-6 and IFN-γ genes in psoriasis patients, depending on the duration of ustekinumab therapy.

Conclusions

The increase in mRNA copy numbers of the pro-inflammatory IL-6 and IFN-γ genes in the following weeks of therapy may suggest that patients treated with ustekinumab may progressively develop resistance to biological treatment.

New Insights in the Treatment of SAPHO Syndrome and Medication Recommendations

Synovitis, acne, pustulosis, hyperostosis, osteitis (SAPHO) syndrome is a rare autoinflammatory disease characterized by dermatological disorders and osteoarticular inflammatory lesions. This article reviews the application of biologics and other treatments based on the therapeutic target and the size of molecules in SAPHO syndrome. We found that drugs, especially biologics, have different effects on bone, joint, and skin damage. This may relate to the different inflammatory pathways involved in the osteoarticular and cutaneous symptoms in SAPHO patients. In this study, we provide stratified medication recommendations for SAPHO syndrome. Patients with osteoarticular symptoms can consider tumor necrosis factor blockers, JAK inhibitor, interleukin (IL)-1 inhibitor, and IL-17 inhibitor. Patients with cutaneous symptoms should consider IL-17 and JAK inhibitors. Apremilast, Tripterygium wilfordii Hook F, and bisphosphonates are other effective treatments.

Why Inhibition of IL-23 Lacked Efficacy in Ankylosing Spondylitis

The term spondyloarthritis pertains to both axial and peripheral arthritis including ankylosing spondylitis (AS) and psoriatic arthritis (PsA), which is strongly linked to psoriasis and also the arthritis associated with inflammatory bowel disease. The argument supporting the role for IL-23 across the spectrum of SpA comes from 4 sources. First, genome wide associated studies (GWAS) have shown that all the aforementioned disorders exhibit IL-23R pathway SNPs, whereas HLA-B27 is not linked to all of these diseases-hence the IL-23 pathway represents the common genetic denominator. Secondly, experimental animal models have demonstrated a pivotal role for the IL-23/IL-17 axis in SpA related arthropathy that initially manifests as enthesitis, but also synovitis and axial inflammation and also associated aortic root and cutaneous inflammation. Thirdly, the emergent immunology of the human enthesis also supports the presence of IL-23 producing myeloid cells, not just at the enthesis but in other SpA associated sites including skin and gut. Finally, drugs that target the IL-23 pathway show excellent efficacy for skin disease, efficacy for IBD and also in peripheral arthropathy associated with SpA. The apparent failure of IL-23 blockade in the AS which is effectively a spinal polyenthesitis but evidence for efficacy of IL-23 inhibition for peripheral enthesitis in PsA and preliminary suggestions for benefit in axial PsA, raises many questions. Key amongst these is whether spinal inflammation may exhibit entheseal IL-17A production independent of IL-23 but peripheral enthesitis is largely dependent on IL-23 driven IL-17 production. Furthermore, IL-23 blocking strategies in animal models may prevent experimental SpA evolution but not prevent established disease, perhaps pointing towards a role for IL-23 in innate immune disease initiation whereas persistent disease is dependent on memory T-cell responses that drive IL-17A production independently of IL-23, but this needs further study. Furthermore, IL-12/23 posology in inflammatory bowel disease is substantially higher than that used in AS trials which merits consideration. Therefore, the IL-23 pathway is centrally involved in the SpA concept but the nuances and intricacies in axial inflammation that suggest non-response to IL-23 antagonism await formal definition. The absence of comparative immunology between the different skeletal sites renders explanations purely hypothetical at this juncture.

The IL-17/IL-23 Axis and Its Genetic Contribution to Psoriatic Arthritis

Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is a chronic inflammatory disease belonging to the family of spondyloarthropathies (SpA). PsA commonly aggravates psoriasis of the skin and frequently manifests as an oligoarthritis with axial skeletal involvement and extraarticular manifestations including dactylitis, enthesitis, and uveitis. The weight of genetic predisposition to psoriasis and PsA is illustrated by the concordance rates in monozygotic twins which clearly demonstrate that genomics is insufficient to induce the clinical phenotype. The association of PsA with several single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) at the IL23R locus and the involvement of Th17 cells in the immunopathogenesis of PsA clearly put the IL-23/IL-17 axis in the spotlight. The IL-23 and IL-17 cytokines have a pivotal role in the chronic inflammation of the synovium in PsA and are also prominent in the skin lesions of those with PsA. In this review, we focus on the genetic association of the IL-23/IL-17 axis with PsA and the contribution of these master cytokines in the pathophysiology of the disease, highlighting the main cell types incriminated in PsA and their specific role in the peripheral blood, lesional skin and joints of patients. We then provide an overview of the approved biologic drugs targeting the IL-23/IL-17 axis and discuss the advantages of genetic stratification to enhance personalized therapies in PsA.

Comparative Effectiveness of Ustekinumab Versus Adalimumab in Induction of Clinical Response and Remission in Crohn's Disease: Experience of a Real-World Cohort at a Tertiary Care Inflammatory Bowel Disease Referral Center

Background

There is paucity of head-to-head studies comparing the effectiveness of ustekinumab (UST) and adalimumab (ADA) in Crohn's disease (CD). Here we provide a real-world comparison of these two agents.

Methods

We conducted an ambidirectional cohort study. Each patient included had moderate to severe active CD. Clinical response and remission were assessed between 4 and 16 weeks after induction.

Results

Of a total of 163 patients, 97 were induced with ADA and 66 were induced with UST. Logistic regression model analysis adjusted based on effect size showed that ADA when compared to UST induced clinical response (73.2% vs. 50% (odds ratio (OR): 2.40; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.14 - 5.07; P = 0.02)) and remission (44.3% vs. 27.7% (OR: 2.35; 95% CI: 1.07 - 5.16; P = 0.034) in a statistically significantly higher proportion of patients. Among tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-naive patients, when comparing ADA vs. UST, ADA was superior in inducing clinical response (69/89 (77.5%) vs. 4/10 (40%) (OR: 4.26; 95% CI: 1.08 - 16.84; P = 0.04)), but not remission (41/89 (46%) vs. 3/9 (33%) (OR: 1.64; 95% CI: 0.39 - 6.97; P = 0.503)). Among TNF-experienced patients, ADA was numerically inferior in inducing clinical response (2/8 (25%) vs. 29/56 (52%) (OR: 0.38; 95% CI: 0.07 - 1.94; P = 0.24)) and remission (2/8 (25%) vs. 15/56 (27%) (OR: 1.22; 95% CI: 0.22 - 6.81; P = 0.82)), but neither of these differences were statistically significant.

Conclusions

In a real-world setting, the rate of clinical response and remission was higher among patients with CD who received ADA compared to UST. Of note, however, despite the small sample sizes of TNF-experienced patients who received ADA and TNF-naive patients who received UST, the higher effectiveness of ADA in inducing clinical response and indeed remission among patients with CD with active disease appears to primarily be driven by those who are TNF-naive. Among TNF-experienced patients, UST may be superior in inducing clinical response and equally effective in inducing clinical remission when compared to ADA. Based on this study, one may infer that among TNF-experienced patients with CD with active disease, one could consider switching to an agent such as UST instead of a second approved TNF blocker. However, larger studies comparing the two agents are required.

Discovery of the IL-23/IL-17 Signaling Pathway and the Treatment of Psoriasis

Psoriasis vulgaris is a common, heterogeneous, chronic inflammatory skin disease characterized by thickened, red, scaly plaques and systemic inflammation. Psoriasis is also associated with multiple comorbid conditions, such as joint destruction, cardiovascular disease, stroke, hypertension, metabolic syndrome, and chronic kidney disease. The discovery of IL-17-producing T cells in a mouse model of autoimmunity transformed our understanding of inflammation driven by T lymphocytes and associations with human inflammatory diseases, such as psoriasis. Under the regulation of IL-23, T cells that produce high levels of IL-17 create a self-amplifying, feed-forward inflammatory response in keratinocytes that drives the development of thickened skin lesions infiltrated with a mixture of inflammatory cell populations. Recently, the Food and Drug Administration approved multiple highly effective psoriasis therapies that disrupt IL-17 (secukinumab, ixekizumab, and brodalumab) and IL-23 (guselkumab and tildrakizumab) signaling in the skin, thus leading to a major paradigm shift in the way that psoriatic disease is managed.

Neurological and Neuropsychiatric Adverse Effects of Dermatologic Medications

Severe, recalcitrant dermatologic conditions often require systemic treatment. Although efficacious, these medications have been associated with wide-ranging adverse reactions. Some are reversible, predictable, and either dose-dependent or treatment length-dependent, while others are unpredictable, irreversible, and potentially fatal. This review examines the neuropsychiatric adverse effects associated with US FDA-approved medications for treatment of the following dermatologic pathologies that typically require systemic therapy: autoimmune dermatoses, acne, psoriasis, and melanoma. A search of the literature was performed, with adverse effects ranging from mild headaches and neuropathy to severe encephalopathies. The medications associated with the most serious reactions were those used to treat psoriasis, especially the older non-biologic medications such as cyclosporine A and methotrexate. Given the importance of these systemic dermatologic therapies in treating severe, recalcitrant conditions, and the wide variety of potentially serious neuropsychiatric adverse effects of these medications, neurologists, psychiatrists, dermatologists, oncologists, and primary care providers must be aware of the potential for these neuropsychiatric adverse reactions to allow for appropriate counseling, management, and medication withdrawal.

Secukinumab for the treatment of psoriatic arthritis

INTRODUCTION

Secukinumab (Cosentyx) is an interleukin-17A (IL-17A) inhibitor administered subcutaneously. Through 2016, it had received approval in a number of countries, including the USA, Japan and in the EU for the treatment of plaque psoriasis, psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and ankylosing spondylitis (AS).

AREAS COVERED

This review addresses the mechanism of action, efficacy and safety of secukinumab observed in clinical studies of patients with PsA. Data from recent studies of secukinumab in psoriasis, PsA and AS are included. Expert commentary: Secukinumab appears to be effective in improving various aspects of PsA, including improvements in psoriatic skin, enthesitis and dactylitis, as well as inhibition of the radiographic progression of peripheral arthritis. Secukinumab was in general well tolerated; the most common adverse events were nasopharyngitis, headache, and upper respiratory tract infection.

Interleukin‑12B is upregulated by decoy receptor 3 in rheumatoid synovial fibroblasts

Decoy receptor 3 (DcR3) competitively binds to three ligands, Fas ligand, lymphotoxin‑related inducible ligand that competes for glycoprotein D binding to herpesvirus entry mediator on T cells and tumor necrosis factor‑like ligand 1A (TL1A), to prevent their effects. Recent studies have suggested that DcR3 directly affects cells as a ligand. Using a microarray assay, our group newly identified interleukin (IL)‑12B, which encodes the p40 subunit common to IL‑12 and IL‑23, as one of the genes for which expression in fibroblast‑like synoviocytes from patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA‑FLS) is induced by DcR3. The present study demonstrated that IL‑12B mRNA expression was upregulated by DcR3‑Fc in RA‑FLS in a dose‑dependent manner, but not in OA‑FLS. IL‑12B p40 protein in RA‑FLS was increased when stimulated with DcR3‑Fc. Pre‑treatment with anti‑TL1A antibody suppressed the upregulation of IL‑12B mRNA in RA‑FLS stimulated with DcR3‑Fc. DcR3 mRNA expression in RA‑FLS was induced by IL‑23, but not by IL‑12. These results indicated that DcR3 may increase IL‑12 or IL‑23 by inducing IL‑12B p40 expression via membrane‑bound TL1A on RA‑FLS and that IL‑23 reciprocally induces DcR3 expression in RA‑FLS. DcR3 and IL‑23 may interact in a feedback loop that aggravates local inflammation in patients with RA.

Pharmacological treatment of spondyloarthritis: exploring the effectiveness of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, traditional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs and biological therapies

Spondyloarthritis represents a heterogeneous group of articular inflammatory diseases that share common genetic, clinical and radiological features. The therapy target of spondyloarthritis relies mainly in improving patients' quality of life, controlling articular inflammation, preventing the structural joints damage and preserving the functional abilities, autonomy and social participation of patients. Among these, traditional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs have been demonstrated to be effective in the management of peripheral arthritis; moreover, in the last decade, biological therapies have improved the approach to spondyloarthritis. In patients with axial spondyloarthritis, tumor necrosis factor α inhibitors are currently the only effective therapy in patients for whom conventional therapy with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs has failed. The aim of this review is to summarize the current experience and evidence about the pharmacological approach in spondyloarthritis patients.

New treatment paradigms in psoriatic arthritis: an update on new therapeutics approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The purpose of this study is to give an overview of the new treatments approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for use in psoriatic arthritis (PsA).

RECENT FINDINGS

FDA has approved three new drugs for PsA: Certolizumab-pegol: a PEGylated Fc-free tumour necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi); ustekinumab: an anti interleukin (IL)-12 and IL-23 mAb; and apremilast and oral phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor. On well designed and extensive developing programmes, all three drugs proved to be effective for the treatment of most PsA manifestations, including peripheral arthritis, skin involvement, enthesitis, dactylitis, quality of life and radiographic progression in patients failing traditional disease modifying drugs (DMARDs) and TNFi. Safety profile of all three drugs seems to be reassuring until now, although long-term data are still not available. Although Certolizumab-pegol is likely to be placed among the other TNFi, ustekinumab and apremilast, due to lower efficacy on arthritis, are being more frequently used as second-line therapy after TNFi failure, especially among rheumatologists.

SUMMARY

There are new therapeutic options approved for the treatment of PsA. For the first time, well proved effective therapies with a different mechanism of action than the inhibition of TNF alpha are available for the treatment of this progressive disease.

Psoriatic arthritis for the dermatologist

Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is a chronic, progressive, inflammatory spondyloarthropathy that affects approximately one-third of patients with all types of psoriasis. Dermatologists are in a unique position to recognize early symptoms of PsA, initiate appropriate therapy, and prevent development of further disability. The course of PsA can be modulated by immunosuppressive therapy; patients with moderate-to-severe disease require aggressive management with medications proven to halt disease progression. It is essential for the dermatologist to understand the safety, tolerability, efficacy, cost, and potential to halt disease progression with available medications for this relatively common and potentially disabling disease.

Heterogeneity of autoimmune diseases: pathophysiologic insights from genetics and implications for new therapies

Recent advances in genome-wide association studies (GWAS) across autoimmune and immune-mediated diseases have augmented our understanding of pathogenic mechanisms underlying these diseases. This has further highlighted their heterogeneous nature, both within and between diseases. Furthermore, varying responses to therapy have also served to underline the importance of this heterogeneity in the manner in which these diseases are diagnosed and treated. Here we discuss our current understanding of the shared pathways of autoimmunity, including the tumor necrosis factor (TNF), major histocompatibility complex (MHC), interleukin 23 receptor (IL23R) and protein tyrosine phosphatase non-receptor type 22 (PTPN22) pathways. In addition, we summarize effective specific therapies tested across major autoimmune diseases, highlighting the insight they have provided into disease mechanisms and their implications for potential future improvements.

What happened after the clinical trials: long-term safety and efficacy of ustekinumab in daily clinical practice

BACKGROUND

Ustekinumab has been investigated in patients with psoriasis by randomized clinical trials. There are few data on ustekinumab use under 'real life' conditions outside long-term registries.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of our study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ustekinumab as a long-term therapy in real life.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the data of 71 patients who had been treated with ustekinumab up to 2 years. Efficacy data were analyzed both by 'as treated' and 'intention to treat-last observation carried forward'.

RESULTS

A significant improvement in the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index score was observed at 4 weeks and further improvements were observed throughout the treatment. Adverse events were generally mild.

CONCLUSIONS

In routine administration ustekinumab seems to be more efficient than reported by randomized clinical trials. Our results are encouraging and can answer the patients' biggest concern on whether ustekinumab is an effective and safe drug for long-term use.

Pathogenic aspects of treatment of psoriatic patients

The article describes high incidence and morbidity rate of psoriasis, substantial reduction in the life quality and psychosocial disadaptation of patients, and presents certain particular features of psoriasis pathogenesis taking into consideration the role of immune mechanisms and relation between the disease and other chronic processes in the organism, as a result of which psoriasis is considered to be a multimorbid condition. The multimorbidity of psoriasis is an important factor for selecting a therapy, especially for patients with severe forms of the disease.

Biological therapies for spondyloarthritis

Biological therapies and new imaging techniques have changed the therapeutic and diagnostic approach to spondyloarthritis. In patients with axial spondyloarthritis, tumor necrosis factor α (TNFα) inhibitor treatment is currently the only effective therapy in patients for whom conventional therapy with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) has failed. TNFα inhibitor treatment is more effective in preventing articular damage in peripheral joints than in axial ones. It is important to treat patients at an early stage of disease to reduce disease progression; moreover it is necessary to identify causes of therapy inefficacy in preventing joint damage in the axial subset.

Chronic inflammatory diseases: do immunological patterns drive the choice of biotechnology drugs? A critical review

Chronic inflammatory diseases represent a heterogeneous group of conditions that can affect practically any organ or system. An increasing number of biologic agents have been developed to selectively target the cell populations and signaling pathways involved in chronic inflammation, including cytokines, monoclonal antibodies and engineered receptors. This approach has been remarkably successful in alleviating some of the signs and symptoms of refractory autoimmune diseases. The use of this therapeutic strategy is likely to increase with the introduction of biosimilar agents. The different nature of these biological products makes the comparison of their pharmaceutical and clinical characteristics difficult, including safety and potency and these issues may be particularly relevant in the case of biosimilars. In addition, the heterogeneity of autoimmune diseases and of autoimmune patients, further adds to the complexity of choosing the right drug for each patient and predicting efficacy and safety of the treatment. In this review, we summarize actual knowledge about current biological agents and their use in autoimmune diseases, with a special emphasis for rheumatoid arthritis, inflammatory bowel diseases and psoriasis. The purpose of this analysis is to address the most critical issues raised by the rapid advancements in this field over recent years, and to acknowledge the potentially valuable gains brought about by the increasing availability of these new biologic agents.

The Th17 axis in psoriatic disease: pathogenetic and therapeutic implications

Psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis represent two paradigmatic conditions characterized by chronic inflammation and possibly autoimmunity, despite the absence of known serum autoantibodies. The two diseases, albeit strongly correlated from clinical, genetic, and epidemiogical standpoints, manifest significant differences in terms of etiology and pathogenetic mechanisms. Nonetheless, Th17 cells appear crucial to both diseases, and IL23 is the cytokine involved in determining the fate of naive CD4+ cells to differentiate into a pathogenic phenotype. This basic experimental observation led to a clear understanding of the immune dysfunction causing psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis but, more importantly, also led to new therapeutic approaches. In recent years, monoclonal antibodies directed to IL12/IL23 (ustekinumab) or IL17 (secukinumab, ixekizumab, brodalumab) are being investigated or have proven to be beneficial for patients with psoriatic disease, thus further supporting the view that Th17 cells play a pivotal role in disease onset and perpetuation. These most recent reports indeed represent significant developments that may allow overcoming the TNFα pathway as the major therapeutic target in chronic inflammation.