1
|
Łosińska K, Pripp AH, Bakland G, Fevang BTS, Brekke LK, Wierød A, Korkosz M, Haugeberg G. Comparative Effectiveness and Persistence of SB4 and Reference Etanercept in Patients With Psoriatic Arthritis in Norway. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2024; 76:1303-1312. [PMID: 38600298 DOI: 10.1002/acr.25345] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2023] [Revised: 03/28/2024] [Accepted: 04/08/2024] [Indexed: 04/12/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE We aim to compare drug effectiveness and persistence between the reference etanercept (ETN) and ETN biosimilar SB4 in patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) naive to ETN and to investigate drug effectiveness and persistence in those undergoing a mandatory nonmedical switch from ETN to SB4. METHODS We used a retrospective comparative database study including 1,138 patients with PsA treated with ETN or SB4 (years 1999-2021) in Norway. Disease activity score in 28 joints (DAS28) and drug persistence were compared between unmatched ETN (n = 644) and SB4 (n = 252) cohorts and in matched analyses (n = 144, both cohorts) at baseline using a propensity score (PS) to adjust for confounders. Drug persistence was analyzed with the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS In unmatched analyses, difference in change from baseline between ETN (n = 140) and SB4 (n = 132) for DAS28 at one year was mean 0.67 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.38-0.96) in favor of ETN. In PS-matched analyses, the difference in change from baseline between ETN (n = 54) and SB4 (n = 54) was mean 0.09 (95% CI -0.33 to 0.50), and the mean difference assessed with an analysis of covariance model was 0.01 (95% CI -0.38 to 0.40), both within predefined equivalence margin (±0.6). Drug persistence at one year was mean 0.75 (95% CI 0.71-0.78) for ETN, mean 0.58 (95% CI 0.51-0.63) for SB4, hazard ratio (HR) 2.45 (95% CI 2.02-2.97) in unmatched analysis, and mean 0.55 (95% CI 0.46-0.63) for ETN, mean 0.60 (95% CI 0.51-0.67) for SB4, HR 1.29 (95%CI 0.94-1.76) in PS-matched cohorts. CONCLUSION At one year, outcomes for PsA disease activity and drug persistence were comparable for patients treated with either ETN or SB4. In patients undergoing a mandatory nonmedical switch from ETN to SB4, drug effectiveness was maintained during a two-year period.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katarzyna Łosińska
- University Hospital, Krakow, Poland, and Sørlandet Hospital, Kristiansand, Norway
| | - Are Hugo Pripp
- Oslo University Hospital, Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway
| | - Gunnstein Bakland
- University Hospital of Northern Norway, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway
| | | | | | - Ada Wierød
- Drammen Sykehus, Vestre Viken HF, Drammen, Norway
| | - Mariusz Korkosz
- University Hospital, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland
| | - Glenn Haugeberg
- Sørlandet Hospital, Kristiansand, and Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kearsley-Fleet L, Rokad A, Tsoi MF, Zhao SS, Lunt M, Watson KD, Hyrich KL. Outcomes following switching from etanercept originator to etanercept biosimilar in 1024 patients with RA: a matched-analysis of the BSRBR-RA. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2024; 63:2082-2092. [PMID: 37672014 PMCID: PMC11292141 DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/kead470] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2023] [Revised: 08/29/2023] [Accepted: 08/31/2023] [Indexed: 09/07/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Adults with RA are being switched from etanercept originator to biosimilar in non-medical/cost-saving switching. This analysis aims to investigate outcomes in these patients, including (i) drug survival and (ii) disease activity at 6 months and 12 months, compared with those who remain on the originator. METHODS Using BSRBR-RA, those who switched directly from etanercept originator to biosimilar were identified and matched to patients receiving the originator, based on gender, age, disease duration and originator start year. Drug survival was calculated; Cox-proportional hazard models assessed differences in drug persistence between those who switched vs remaining on originator. Change in DAS28 after 6 months and 12 months was compared between cohorts. Multiple imputation was used. RESULTS A total of 1024 adults with RA switching from etanercept originator to biosimilar were included, with a matched cohort of patients remaining on the originator. Patients who switched onto a biosimilar product were no more likely to discontinue etanercept treatment vs those who remained on the originator; hazard ratio 1.06 (95%CI 0.89-1.26), with 65% of patients remaining on treatment at three years. Ninety-five (9%) patients switched back to the originator within the first year. After 6 months and 12 months, biosimilar patients were no more likely to have a worsening of DAS28 (>0.6 units) compared with those who remained on the originator. CONCLUSIONS This is the largest matched comparative effectiveness analysis showing patients switching from etanercept originator to biosimilar appearing to do just as well with regard to disease activity and drug persistence compared with those who remained on the originator. These data will be reassuring to clinicians and patients regarding non-medical switching.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lianne Kearsley-Fleet
- Centre for Epidemiology Versus Arthritis, Centre for Musculoskeletal Research, Division of Musculoskeletal and Dermatological Sciences, Faculty of Biology Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
| | - Aasiyah Rokad
- Centre for Epidemiology Versus Arthritis, Centre for Musculoskeletal Research, Division of Musculoskeletal and Dermatological Sciences, Faculty of Biology Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
| | - Man-Fung Tsoi
- Centre for Epidemiology Versus Arthritis, Centre for Musculoskeletal Research, Division of Musculoskeletal and Dermatological Sciences, Faculty of Biology Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
| | - Sizheng Steven Zhao
- Centre for Epidemiology Versus Arthritis, Centre for Musculoskeletal Research, Division of Musculoskeletal and Dermatological Sciences, Faculty of Biology Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
| | - Mark Lunt
- Centre for Epidemiology Versus Arthritis, Centre for Musculoskeletal Research, Division of Musculoskeletal and Dermatological Sciences, Faculty of Biology Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
| | - Kath D Watson
- Centre for Epidemiology Versus Arthritis, Centre for Musculoskeletal Research, Division of Musculoskeletal and Dermatological Sciences, Faculty of Biology Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
| | - BSRBR-RA Contributors Group
- Centre for Epidemiology Versus Arthritis, Centre for Musculoskeletal Research, Division of Musculoskeletal and Dermatological Sciences, Faculty of Biology Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
| | - Kimme L Hyrich
- Centre for Epidemiology Versus Arthritis, Centre for Musculoskeletal Research, Division of Musculoskeletal and Dermatological Sciences, Faculty of Biology Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
- NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Kearsley-Fleet L, Baildam E, Beresford MW, Douglas S, Foster HE, Southwood TR, Hyrich KL. Outcomes after anti-tumour necrosis factor originator to biosimilar switching in children and young people with juvenile idiopathic arthritis in the UK: a national cohort study. THE LANCET. RHEUMATOLOGY 2024; 6:e438-e446. [PMID: 38843858 DOI: 10.1016/s2665-9913(24)00087-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2024] [Revised: 03/21/2024] [Accepted: 03/22/2024] [Indexed: 06/21/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND For cost-saving purposes, children and young people with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) are being switched (for non-medical reasons) from biological originators to biosimilars. Here, we aimed to investigate those who switched from an anti-tumour necrosis factor (TNF) originator to a biosimilar, regarding drug survival and disease activity, compared with a matched cohort who continued the originator. METHODS This analysis included all patients in the UK JIA Biologics Register switching directly from an anti-TNF originator to a biosimilar of the same product. All patients were matched (age, sex, disease duration, calendar year of when patients started originator therapy, line of therapy, and International League of Associations for Rheumatology [ILAR] category) to patients continuing the originator. For those matched successfully, a Cox proportional hazard model assessed whether drug persistence differed between those who switched compared with those who continued the originator. Overall change in the 71-joint juvenile arthritis disease activity score and the proportion of patients with a clinically important worsening score (by ≥1·7 units) after 6 months was compared between cohorts. This analysis was designed to address a priority research area set by our patient partners. FINDINGS There were 224 children and young people with non-systemic JIA (139 [62%] were female, and 85 [38%] were male) identified as switching from a biological originator to a biosimilar of the same product from Jan 1, 2017, to July 7, 2023. 143 (64%) patients were originally on adalimumab, 56 (25%) on etanercept, and 25 (11%) on infliximab. Of these, 164 patients were matched successfully to those continuing the originator. There was no evidence that patients switching were more likely to stop treatment compared with those continuing the originator, with a hazard ratio of 1·46 (95% CI 0·93-2·30). Of the 51 patients in the biosimilar group who stopped treatment, 18 (35%) switched back to the originator (14 in the first year), 28 (55%) started a different biological drug, and five (10%) discontinued all treatment by the last follow-up. Of the 87 matched patients with available disease activity, there was no evidence that JADAS-71 worsened more after 6 months, with an odds ratio of 0·71 (95% CI 0·34-1·51; p=0·38). INTERPRETATION In this matched comparative effectiveness analysis, children and young people with JIA switched from originators to biosimilars. Disease activity was similar between patients switching compared with those continuing the originator. Three quarters of patients were still receiving their biosimilar after 1 year, with switching back to originator uncommon, at only 9% after 1 year, suggesting good tolerability of non-medical switching in this patient population. This information is reassuring to clinicians and patients regarding the effect of non-medical biological switching. FUNDING British Society for Rheumatology, Versus Arthritis, and National Institutes for Health Research Manchester Biomedical Research Centre.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lianne Kearsley-Fleet
- Centre for Musculoskeletal Research, Division of Musculoskeletal and Dermatological Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK.
| | | | - Michael W Beresford
- Department of Paediatric Rheumatology, Alder Hey Children's NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK; Institute of Life Course and Medical Specialities, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Sharon Douglas
- Scottish Network for Arthritis in Children, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Helen E Foster
- Population and Health Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle, UK
| | | | - Kimme L Hyrich
- Centre for Musculoskeletal Research, Division of Musculoskeletal and Dermatological Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK; National Institute of Health Research Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Sakane H, Yonemoto Y, Okamura K, Suto T, Inoue M, Mitomi H, Tsuchida K, Kaneko T, Tamura Y, Chikuda H. Efficacy of switching from originator etanercept to biosimilar YLB113 in real-world patients with rheumatoid arthritis: A retrospective 12 months follow-up study. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong) 2024; 32:10225536241265818. [PMID: 38907590 DOI: 10.1177/10225536241265818] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/24/2024] Open
Abstract
Purpose: To investigate the disease activity in real-world patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who switched from originator etanercept (ETN) to biosimilar YLB113. Methods: Forty one RA patients who switched from ETN to YLB113 were divided into 2 groups based on the Disease Activity Score based on the 28-joint count (DAS28) 12 months after switching (R group: DAS28 < 2.6, N group: DAS28 ≥ 2.6), and the baseline characteristics were statistically examined. A receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis was performed to estimate the cut-off value of DAS28 at baseline to achieve remission 12 months after switching. Results: There was no significant difference in the DAS28 at baseline and 12 months after switching (p = .83). Sixteen out of the 20 patients in remission at baseline achieved remission after switching. A univariate analysis revealed the rheumatoid factor (p = .04) and DAS28 (p < .001) at baseline were significantly lower in the R group than in the N group. Furthermore, logistic regression analysis revealed DAS28 was an independent factor (p = .004) for achieving remission 12 months after switching. An ROC curve analysis showed the optimal cut-off value for DAS28 at baseline to achieve remission at 12 months after switching was 2.5. Conclusions: RA patients who achieved remission using originator ETN, were able to maintain remission even if they switched to YLB113.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hideo Sakane
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, Maebashi, Japan
| | - Yukio Yonemoto
- Department of Rheumatology, Inoue Hospital, Takasaki, Japan
| | - Koichi Okamura
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, Maebashi, Japan
| | - Takahito Suto
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, Maebashi, Japan
| | - Makoto Inoue
- Department of Rheumatology, Inoue Hospital, Takasaki, Japan
| | | | - Kosei Tsuchida
- Department of Rheumatology, Inoue Hospital, Takasaki, Japan
| | - Tetsuya Kaneko
- Department of Rheumatology, Inoue Hospital, Takasaki, Japan
| | | | - Hirotaka Chikuda
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, Maebashi, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Deakin CT, Littlejohn GO, Griffiths H, Ciciriello S, O'Sullivan C, Smith T, Youssef P, Bird P. Comparative effectiveness of etanercept originator and biosimilar for treating rheumatoid arthritis: implications for cost-savings. Intern Med J 2024; 54:795-801. [PMID: 38009675 DOI: 10.1111/imj.16296] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2023] [Accepted: 11/06/2023] [Indexed: 11/29/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS This study aimed to assess the comparative effectiveness of the etanercept (ETN) originator (Enbrel) and ETN biosimilar SB4 (Brenzys) as first-line treatment in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), while also exploring the potential cost-savings associated with this approach in Australia. METHODS Clinical data were obtained from the Optimising Patient outcomes in rheumatoLogy Australian real-world data set. Adult patients with RA who had initiated treatment with the ETN originator or biosimilar as their first-recorded biologic or targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug between 1 April 2017 and 31 December 2020 were included. Treatment persistence was analysed using survival analysis. Cost-savings were estimated based on data reported by the Australian National Prescribing Service MedicineWise. RESULTS Propensity score matching followed by inverse probability of treatment weighting selected patients taking originator (n = 209) or biosimilar (n = 141) with similar baseline characteristics and eliminated small differences in baseline disease activity. The median time for 50% of the patients to stop treatment was 19.4 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 14.7-36.4 months) for the originator and 22.4 months (95% CI, 15.0-33.1 months) for the biosimilar (P = 0.95). As a result of pricing policies established by the Australian Government, introduction of the ETN biosimilar would have resulted in a cost-savings of over AU$9.5 million for 1 year of treatment for the patients reported in this study. CONCLUSION Treatment persistence using either ETN originator or biosimilar was similar. The cost of all brands of ETN markedly reduced upon listing of the ETN biosimilar, resulting in significant savings for the Australian Government.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claire T Deakin
- OPAL Rheumatology Ltd, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Centre for Adolescent Rheumatology at University College London, University College London Hospitals and Great Ormond Street Hospital, London, UK
- National Institute of Health Research Biomedical Centre at Great Ormond Street Hospital, London, UK
| | - Geoffrey O Littlejohn
- OPAL Rheumatology Ltd, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Department of Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Hedley Griffiths
- OPAL Rheumatology Ltd, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Barwon Rheumatology Service, Geelong, Victoria, Australia
| | - Sabina Ciciriello
- OPAL Rheumatology Ltd, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | | | - Tegan Smith
- OPAL Rheumatology Ltd, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Peter Youssef
- OPAL Rheumatology Ltd, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Paul Bird
- OPAL Rheumatology Ltd, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Department of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Schmalzing M, Kellner H, Askari A, De Toro Santos J, Vazquez Perez-Coleman JC, Foti R, Jeka S, Haraoui B, Allanore Y, Peichl P, Oehri M, Rahman M, Furlan F, Romero E, Hachaichi S, Both C, Brueckmann I, Sheeran T. Real-World Effectiveness and Safety of SDZ ETN, an Etanercept Biosimilar, in Patients with Rheumatic Diseases: Final Results from Multi-Country COMPACT Study. Adv Ther 2024; 41:315-330. [PMID: 37950790 PMCID: PMC10796424 DOI: 10.1007/s12325-023-02706-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2023] [Accepted: 10/03/2023] [Indexed: 11/13/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION COMPACT, a non-interventional study, evaluated the persistence, effectiveness, safety and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), axial-spondyloarthritis (axSpA) or psoriatic arthritis (PsA) treated with SDZ ETN (etanercept [ETN] biosimilar) in Europe and Canada. METHODS Patients (aged ≥ 18 years) who have been treated with SDZ ETN were categorised on the basis of prior treatment status (groups A-D): patients in clinical remission or with low disease activity under treatment with reference ETN or biosimilar ETN and switched to SDZ ETN; patients who received non-ETN targeted therapies and switched to SDZ ETN; biologic-naïve patients who started SDZ ETN after conventional therapy failure; or disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (DMARD)-naïve patients with RA considered suitable for treatment initiation with a biologic and started on treatment with SDZ ETN. The primary endpoint was drug persistence, defined as time from study enrolment until discontinuation of SDZ ETN treatment. RESULTS Of the 1466 patients recruited, 844 (57.6%) had RA, 334 (22.8%) had axSpA and 288 (19.6%) had PsA. Patients had an ongoing SDZ ETN treatment at the time of enrolment for an observed average of 138 days (range 1-841); 22.7% of patients discontinued SDZ ETN through 12 months of study observation. Overall, all the patients receiving SDZ ETN showed good treatment persistence at 12 months with discontinuation rates of 15.2%, 25.7% and 27.8% in groups A, B and C, respectively. Across all patient groups, no major differences were observed in the disease activity and PRO scores between baseline and month 12. Injection-site reactions were low across the treatment groups. CONCLUSION These results support the effectiveness and safety of SDZ ETN treatment in patients with RA, axSpA or PsA in real-life conditions. The treatment persistence rates observed were consistent with previously published reports of patients treated with reference or other biosimilar ETN. No new safety signals were identified.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marc Schmalzing
- Department of Internal Medicine II, University Hospital, Rheumatology/Clinical Immunology, Würzburg, Germany.
| | - Herbert Kellner
- Center for Rheumatology and Gastroenterology, Hospital Neuwittelsbach, Munich, Germany
| | - Ayman Askari
- Robert Jones and Agnes Hunt Orthopaedic Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Shropshire, UK
| | | | | | - Rosario Foti
- Rheumatology Unit, Policlinico G. Rodolico-S. Marco Hospital, Catania, Italy
| | - Sławomir Jeka
- Clinic and Department of Rheumatology and Connective Tissue Diseases, University Hospital No. 2, Collegium Medicum UM K, Bydgoszcz, Poland
| | | | - Yannick Allanore
- Rheumatology Department, Cochin Hospital, Université de Paris, Paris, France
| | - Peter Peichl
- Evangelisches Krankenhaus Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Martin Oehri
- Rheuma-und Schmerzzentrum Frauenfeld, Frauenfeld, Switzerland
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Tom Sheeran
- University of Wolverhampton, New Cross Hospital, Wolverhampton, UK
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Castro Corredor D, Calvo Pascual LÁ. Imbalanced machine learning classification models for removal biosimilar drugs and increased activity in patients with rheumatic diseases. PLoS One 2023; 18:e0291891. [PMID: 38033115 PMCID: PMC10688843 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0291891] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2023] [Accepted: 11/15/2023] [Indexed: 12/02/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Predict long-term disease worsening and the removal of biosimilar medication in patients with rheumatic diseases. METHODOLOGY Observational, retrospective descriptive study. Review of a database of patients with immune-mediated inflammatory rheumatic diseases who switched from a biological drug (biosimilar or non-biosimilar) to a biosimilar drug for at least 6 months. We selected the most important variables, from 18 variables, using mutual information tests. As patients with disease worsening are a minority, it is very difficult to make models with conventional machine learning techniques, where the best models would always be trivial. For this reason, we computed different types of imbalanced machine learning models, choosing those with better f1-score and mean ROC AUC. RESULTS We computed the best-imbalanced machine learning models to predict disease worsening and the removal of the biosimilar, with f1-scores of 0.52 and 0.63, respectively. Both models are decision trees. In the first one, two important factors are switching of biosimilar and age, and in the second, the relevant variables are optimization and the value of the initial PCR. CONCLUSIONS Biosimilar drugs do not always work well for rheumatic diseases. We obtain two imbalanced machine learning models to detect those cases, where the drug should be removed or where the activity of the disease increases from low to high. In our decision trees appear not previously studied variables, such as age, switching, or optimization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Castro Corredor
- Rheumatology Department, Hospital General Universitario de Ciudad Real, Ciudad Real, Spain
| | - Luis Ángel Calvo Pascual
- Department of Quantitative Methods. ICADE, Universidad Pontificia de Comillas Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Ulu K, Çakan M, Çağlayan Ş, Yiğit RE, Demir F, Coşkuner T, Kardeş E, Sözeri B. Real-life data on efficacy and safety of original Adalimumab and biosimilar Adalimumab (ABP 501) in pediatric rheumatic diseases. Expert Opin Biol Ther 2023; 23:833-839. [PMID: 36101926 DOI: 10.1080/14712598.2022.2123703] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2022] [Accepted: 09/08/2022] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of the original product (OP) and biosimilar product (BP) of adalimumab in pediatric rheumatic diseases. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS The study group consisted of patients who had received original or biosimilar adalimumab (ABP 501) therapy for at least 3 months. The patients were divided into uveitis and arthritis groups based on the indication of adalimumab treatment. Assessment of disease activity was performed by Juvenile Arthritis Disease Activity Score in patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis, and by standardization of uveitis nomenclature criteria in patients with uveitis. RESULTS The study included 140 patients, of which 87 were treated with OP and 53 with BP. In the arthritis group, 26 (63.4%) and 20 (57.1%) patients reached inactive disease according to JADAS-27 in the original and biosimilar adalimumab groups, respectively. In the uveitis group the mean number of exacerbations throughout the treatment period was 0.84 ± 1.07 in the OP group, and 0.58 ± 0.79 in the BP group. There were 71 treatment-emergent adverse events in the OP group and 38 in the BP group. CONCLUSION There was no significant difference between the biosimilar and the original product in efficacy and safety.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kadir Ulu
- Department of Pediatric Rheumatology, University of Health Sciences, Ümraniye Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Mustafa Çakan
- Department of Pediatric Rheumatology, University of Health Sciences, Ümraniye Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Şengül Çağlayan
- Department of Pediatric Rheumatology, University of Health Sciences, Ümraniye Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Ramazan Emre Yiğit
- Department of Pediatric Rheumatology, University of Health Sciences, Ümraniye Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Ferhat Demir
- Department of Pediatric Rheumatology, University of Health Sciences, Ümraniye Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Taner Coşkuner
- Department of Pediatric Rheumatology, University of Health Sciences, Ümraniye Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Esra Kardeş
- Department of Ophthalmology, University of Health Sciences, Ümraniye Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Betül Sözeri
- Department of Pediatric Rheumatology, University of Health Sciences, Ümraniye Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Yoo WH, Kang YM, Kim DW, Kang EH, Lee YA, Suh CH, Sung YK, Lee SH, Gu DH, Lee J, Choe JY. Safety and Effectiveness of Etanercept Biosimilar SB4 for Rheumatic Diseases in South Korea: Real-World Post-marketing Surveillance Data. Rheumatol Ther 2023; 10:329-341. [PMID: 36482248 PMCID: PMC10011358 DOI: 10.1007/s40744-022-00515-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2022] [Accepted: 11/22/2022] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION SB4 is the first approved biosimilar of etanercept, a biologic tumor necrosis factor inhibitor, to treat various autoimmune diseases including axial spondylarthritis (axSpA), rheumatoid arthritis (RA), psoriatic arthritis (PsA), and plaque psoriasis (PsO). This post-marketing surveillance (PMS) study of SB4 investigated safety and effectiveness in routine clinical practice and is part of the drug approval process in Korea. METHODS This prospective, multi-center, open-label, observational, phase IV PMS study was designed to enroll patients with axSpA, RA, PsA, and PsO in Korea from September 2015 to September 2019. Both etanercept-naïve patients or patients switched from reference etanercept were included. SB4 was administered weekly via subcutaneous injections using pre-filled syringes. Safety was assessed by the incidence of adverse events (AEs), adverse drug reactions (ADRs) and serious adverse events (SAE). Effectiveness was assessed by the change from baseline of investigator-rated Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) in patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS) and disease activity score-28 (DAS28) in patients with RA. RESULTS Among 316 enrolled patients, 314 were included in the safety analysis (176 with AS and 138 with RA). The overall incidence of AEs, ADRs and serious AEs were 17.8, 9.9, and 1.3%, respectively. Most AEs were mild (66.7%) or moderate (31.1%) and not related to SB4 (58.9%). Most common AEs were injection site pruritus (1.9%) and injection site rash (1.3%). At week 24, mean disease activity scores significantly decreased compared to baseline in naïve patients with AS and RA (BASDAI 2.7 vs. 6.2, p < 0.0001; DAS28 3.8 vs. 5.7, p < 0.0001) and in switched patients with AS and RA (BASDAI 1.0 vs. 1.3, p = 0.0018; DAS28 2.4 vs. 2.9, p = 0.0893). CONCLUSION This first real-world evidence of SB4 from a phase IV PMS study in Korea shows comparable effectiveness to historical SB4 real-world evidence without any new significant safety signals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wan-Hee Yoo
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Jeonbuk National University Medical School and Research Institute of Clinical Medicine of Jeonbuk National University Hospital, Jeonju, Korea
| | - Young Mo Kang
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kyungpook National University Hospital, Daegu, Korea
| | | | - Eun Ha Kang
- Division of Rheumatology Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea
| | - Yeon-Ah Lee
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kyung Hee University Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Chang-Hee Suh
- Department of Rheumatology, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Korea
| | - Yoon-Kyoung Sung
- Department of Rheumatology, Hanyang University Hospital for Rheumatic Diseases, Seoul, Korea
| | - Sang-Hoon Lee
- Department of Rheumatology, Kyung Hee University Hospital at Gangdong, Kyung Hee University, Seoul, Korea
| | | | | | - Jung-Yoon Choe
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Daegu Catholic University School of Medicine, 33, Duryugongwon-Ro 17-Gil, Nam-Gu, Daegu, Republic of Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Pope J, Hall S, Bombardier C, Haraoui B, Jones G, Naik L, Etzel CJ, Ramey DR, Infante R, Miguelez M, Falcao S, Sahakian S, Wu D. Post-switch Effectiveness of Etanercept Biosimilar Versus Continued Etanercept in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients with Stable Disease: A Prospective Multinational Observational Study. Adv Ther 2022; 39:5259-5273. [PMID: 36136243 DOI: 10.1007/s12325-022-02303-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2022] [Accepted: 08/16/2022] [Indexed: 01/30/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION To better inform clinicians about the use of etanercept biosimilar (SB4) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), COMPANION-B, a prospective real-world observational study, evaluated the effectiveness of the voluntary switch from originator (etanercept, ETN) to SB4 in patients with stable RA (low-disease activity/remission). METHODS The study recruited adult patients (18 years or older) with RA (2010 American College of Rheumatology criteria) prescribed ETN as their first or second biologic for at least 6 months across 14 sites in Canada and five in Australia. Patients had stable disease (Disease Activity Score-28 using erythrocyte sedimentation rate [DAS28-ESR] less than 3.2) at enrollment with no evidence of flare within the previous 3 months. Concomitant disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) were permitted. Patients could elect to continue ETN or voluntarily switch to SB4 in consultation with their doctors. The primary effectiveness measure was the proportion of patients with disease worsening (defined as a DAS28-ESR increase of at least 1.2 from baseline and minimum score of at least 3.2 or a defined modification in RA treatment) during 12 months of follow-up. The secondary effectiveness measure was the proportion of patients with disease worsening at month 6. Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse reactions (NSARs) were recorded. RESULTS Of 163 patients enrolled, 109 elected to continue on ETN and 54 switched to SB4; 65.8% of patients received non-biologic DMARD(s), 52.6% methotrexate, and 10.5% oral corticosteroid(s). At month 12, the proportion of patients with disease worsening was comparable in the ETN group (22.8% [95% CI 15.0-32.2]) and SB4 group (17.6% [95% CI 8.4-30.9]). Similarly, the proportions of patients with disease worsening were also comparable at month 6 (ETN: 7.9% [95% CI 3.5-15.0]; SB4: 7.8% [95% CI 2.2-18.9]). SAEs were low and similar across both groups (ETN: 8.7%; SB4: 5.7%). NSARs were slightly higher in the SB4 vs. ETN group (13.2% vs. 2.9%). CONCLUSIONS SB4 demonstrated comparable effectiveness to ETN over 12 months in patients with stable RA who voluntarily switched to the biosimilar in a real-world setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Janet Pope
- University of Western Ontario and St. Joseph's Hospital, London, ON, Canada.
| | | | | | - Boulos Haraoui
- Rheumatology Institute of Montreal, Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Graeme Jones
- University of Tasmania-Lionheart Rheumatology, Hobart, TAS, Australia
| | - Latha Naik
- University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada
| | | | | | | | - Maia Miguelez
- Otsuka Pharmaceutical Development & Commercialization, Inc., Montreal, QC, Canada
| | | | | | - David Wu
- Merck & Co., Kenilworth, NJ, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Luciano N, Fusaro E, Ditto MC, Ianniello A, Bellis E, Bruni C, Viapiana O, Gremese E, Migliore A, Romoli E, Conforti L, Govoni M, Matucci-Cerinic M, Selmi C. Effectiveness of SB4 Transition from Originator Etanercept in Rheumatoid Arthritis and Axial Spondyloarthritis: A Subgroup Analysis from the BENEFIT Study. RHEUMATOLOGY AND IMMUNOLOGY RESEARCH 2022; 3:31-37. [PMID: 36467021 PMCID: PMC9524806 DOI: 10.2478/rir-2022-0005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2021] [Accepted: 03/02/2022] [Indexed: 06/17/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The pan-European BENEFIT study of patients with stable rheumatoid arthritis (RA) or axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) who transitioned from reference etanercept to SB4 found no clinically meaningful changes in disease control after transition. The analysis aims to illustrate the peculiarities of the Italian cohort of patients compared with the whole population to provide a more real-life approach to the data for the Italian rheumatologists, ruling out possible local confounding factors. METHODS A prospective study for up to 6 months following transition was conducted. Outcome measures of interest include clinical characteristics at time of transition and disease activity scores (Disease Activity Score-28 [DAS28] for RA, Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index [BASDAI] for axSpA) over time and safety. RESULTS One-hundred and eleven subjects (out of the 557 in total enrolled in the study) were derived from 8 Italian sites, including 79 with RA and 32 with axSpA. In both cohorts, the efficacy was maintained at 3 months and 6 months from the transition to the biosimilar with no significant change in mean DAS28 and BASDAI scores: at the end of the 6 months of observation the mean DAS28 and BASDAI was similar to baseline (confidence interval [CI] -0.22, 0.22), while the mean variation of the BASDAI was -0.14. Of note, 100.0% (95% CI 89.1, 100.0) in the axSpA and 90.8% (95% CI 81.5, 95.5) in the RA cohort of patients continued to receive SB4 at month 6 (binary variable with 95% Clopper-Pearson CI). CONCLUSIONS Italian patients with stable RA or axSpA who transitioned from originator Etanercept to SB4 maintained clinical response at 6 months post-transition. Both the cohorts are representative of typical patients with long-standing established diagnoses. Most of the patients transitioned to the same dose regimen of biosimilar as that received for the originator, and the regimen remained unchanged at 6 months, supporting the effectiveness of the transition.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicoletta Luciano
- Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, IRCCS (Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico [Scientific Institute for Research, Hospitalization and Healthcare]) Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, MI, Italy
| | - Enrico Fusaro
- A.O.U. (Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria [University Hospital]) Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino (Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino University Hospital), Rheumatology Unit, Turin, Italy
| | - Maria Chiara Ditto
- A.O.U. (Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria [University Hospital]) Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino (Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino University Hospital), Rheumatology Unit, Turin, Italy
| | - Aurora Ianniello
- ASL (Azienda Sanitaria Locale [Local Healthcare Provider]) Novara (Novara ASL) – Poliambulatorio ASL (ASL Outpatient clinic), Novara, Italy
| | - Emanuela Bellis
- ASL (Azienda Sanitaria Locale [Local Healthcare Provider]) Novara (Novara ASL) – Poliambulatorio ASL (ASL Outpatient clinic), Novara, Italy
| | - Cosimo Bruni
- Department of Investigational and Clinical Medicine, Rheumatology Section, Università degli Studi di Firenze (University of Florence), Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi (Careggi University Hospital), Florence, Italy
| | - Ombretta Viapiana
- Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata (Integrated University Hospital), Verona, Italy
| | - Elisa Gremese
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli-IRCCS (A. Gemelli-IRCCS University Polyclinic), Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore (Sacro Cuore Catholic University), Rome, Italy
| | - Alberto Migliore
- Ospedale San Pietro-Fatebenefratelli (San Pietro-Fatebenefratelli Hospital), Rome, Italy
| | | | | | - Marcello Govoni
- Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria S. Anna (S. Anna University Hospital), Ferrara, Italy
| | - Marco Matucci-Cerinic
- Department of Investigational and Clinical Medicine, Rheumatology Section, Università degli Studi di Firenze (University of Florence), Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi (Careggi University Hospital), Florence, Italy
| | - Carlo Selmi
- Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, IRCCS (Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico [Scientific Institute for Research, Hospitalization and Healthcare]) Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, MI, Italy
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, MI, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Fisher A, Kim JD, Carney G, Dormuth C. Rapid monitoring of health services use following a policy to switch patients from originator to biosimilar etanercept—a cohort study in British Columbia. BMC Rheumatol 2022; 6:5. [PMID: 35081991 PMCID: PMC8793256 DOI: 10.1186/s41927-021-00235-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/12/2021] [Accepted: 10/11/2021] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Drug coverage policies that incentivize switching patients from originator to biosimilar products may result in significant health care savings. Our study aimed to detect early impacts on health services utilization following a mandated switch from originator to biosimilar etanercept in British Columbia (BC), Canada. Methods We conducted a prospective, population-based cohort study using linked administrative health data from BC (2010–2020). The policy cohort consisted of patients with inflammatory arthritis who used originator etanercept in 2019, prior to BC’s Biosimilars Initiative switching policy. Three historical cohorts included patients with inflammatory arthritis who used originator etanercept in the years 2016, 2017, and 2018. We compared the daily cumulative incidences of drug refills and outpatient and inpatient services between the policy and historical cohorts. A likelihood ratio sustained (≥ 31 days) at 7.1 or higher compared with the null hypothesis was chosen a priori as a threshold for a potential impact of the policy. Results Each cohort contained between 1694 and 1963 patients. We detected several potential impacts: 1) a transient increase in etanercept refills between months three and eight (cumulative incidence difference of + 3.0%); 2) an anticipated increase in visits to physicians of any specialty between months three and eight (+ 2.6%); and 3) an anticipated increase in visits to a rheumatologist from the end of month three onwards (+ 12.8%). The policy had no impact on incidences of switching to a different biologic antirheumatic drug, visits to emergency departments, or admissions to hospitals. Conclusions Only transient and/or anticipated increases in drug refills and physician visits were observed during the study period. Additional research on clinical outcomes is recommended to strengthen the evidence that no long-term unintended negative health impacts are associated with BC’s Biosimilars Initiative [switching policy]. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s41927-021-00235-x.
Collapse
|
13
|
Efficacy and Drug Survival after Switching from Etanercept to the Biosimilar SB4: A Real-Life Long-Term Study. J Clin Med 2022; 11:jcm11030621. [PMID: 35160074 PMCID: PMC8837069 DOI: 10.3390/jcm11030621] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2021] [Revised: 01/19/2022] [Accepted: 01/20/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
We evaluated the 3-year drug survival and efficacy of the biosimilar SB4/Benepali in rheumatoid arthritis (RA), psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and ankylosing spondylitis (AS) patients, previously treated with etanercept (ETA). Drug survival rate was calculated using the Kaplan–Meier method and Cox proportional hazard models were developed to examine predictors of SB4 discontinuation. 236 patients (120 RA, 80 PsA and 36 AS), aged 60.7 ± 13.8 years and with an ETA duration of 4.1 ± 3.4 years were included. The 3-year retention rate for SB4 was 94.4%, 88% and 86% in AS, RA and PsA patients, respectively, with no difference between groups. Patients without comorbid disease had higher retention rates vs. patients with comorbid disease (90% vs. 60%, p < 0.0001). Disease activity, as measured by DAS28, DAPSA and BASDAI remained stable over the 3 years. Comorbid disease (hazard ratio; HR: 4.06, p < 0.0001) and HAQ at baseline (HR: 2.42, p = 0.0024) significantly increased the risk of SB4 discontinuation, while previous ETA duration was negatively associated with SB4 discontinuation (HR: 0.97, p = 0.0064). Forty-one (17.4%) patients left the study due to the interruption of the SB4 treatment, 31 (75.6%) discontinued due to inefficacy and 10 (24.4%) due to adverse events. This real-life study confirms the similar efficacy profile of ETA with long-term retention and a good safety profile in inflammatory arthritis patients.
Collapse
|
14
|
Smolen JS, Caporali R, Doerner T, Fautrel B, Benedetti F, Pieper B, Jang M. Treatment journey in rheumatoid arthritis with biosimilars: from better access to good disease control through cost savings and prevention of nocebo effects. RMD Open 2021; 7:rmdopen-2021-001637. [PMID: 34099538 PMCID: PMC8186742 DOI: 10.1136/rmdopen-2021-001637] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/18/2021] [Revised: 04/12/2021] [Accepted: 04/18/2021] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Early diagnosis and treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) are of critical importance to halt the progression of the disease. Optimal use of advanced imaging techniques or biomarkers may facilitate early diagnosis of RA. Even though many disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) are available for RA treatment, biological DMARDs (bDMARDs) offer expanding therapeutic options and good outcomes in patients with RA who do not have a sufficient response to conventional synthetic DMARDs. However, high costs of bDMARDs have limited patient access to optimised disease management and increased the cost burden for healthcare systems. The advent of biosimilars led to significant cost savings driven by price competition among the reference products, which could be beneficial for healthcare systems. Healthcare provider (HCP)–patient communication and informed shared decision-making are crucial to prevent the occurrence of a nocebo effect, which results from negative perceptions that patients may have and could lead to less effective outcomes. Research has demonstrated that effective communication between HCPs and patients utilising positive framing can improve acceptance by patients to be initiated on or switched to a biosimilar and can help to integrate biosimilars into routine clinical practice to maximise benefits for patients with RA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Josef S Smolen
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine 3, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Roberto Caporali
- Division of Clinical Rheumatology, ASST Gaetano Pini-CTO Institute, Milano, Italy.,Department of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, Research Center for Adult and Pediatric Rheumatic Diseases, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milano, Italy
| | - Thomas Doerner
- Department of Medicine and Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.,German Rheumatism Research Center Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Bruno Fautrel
- Department of Rheumatology, Pitié-Salpêtrière University Hospital, Pierre Louis Institute of Epidemiology and Public Health, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, Île-de-France, France
| | - Fabrizio Benedetti
- Neuroscience Department, University of Turin Medical School, Turin, Italy
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Bruni C, Gentileschi S, Pacini G, Bardelli M, Tofani L, Bartoli F, Baldi C, Cometi L, Fiori G, Nacci F, Cantarini L, Guiducci S, Moggi-Pignone A, Frediani B, Matucci-Cerinic M. Switching from originator adalimumab to biosimilar SB5 in a rheumatology cohort: persistence on treatment, predictors of drug interruption and safety analysis. Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis 2021; 13:1759720X211033679. [PMID: 35116080 PMCID: PMC8804457 DOI: 10.1177/1759720x211033679] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2020] [Accepted: 06/29/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Aims: Medical and non-medical switching strategies have been adopted in Europe in
the last few years. We aimed to investigate persistence on treatment with a
SB5 Adalimumab (SB5) biosimilar after switching from Adalimumab (ADA)
originator among patients with inflammatory rheumatic musculoskeletal
diseases (iRMD), identifying possible predictors of drug interruption and
describing adverse events. Method: iRMD patients previously switched to SB5 after at least 6 months of ADA were
enrolled. Data on concomitant medications, disease flares, and persistence
on SB5 up to the last available follow up were collected retrospectively.
Kaplan–Meier and Cox regression models were used. Result: A total of 172 patients (106 females, ADA duration 5.8 ± 3.8 years) were
enrolled, including 34 rheumatoid arthritis, 59 psoriatic arthritis, and 61
axial spondyloarthritis patients. In a 10 ± 3 months follow up, 65 (37.8%)
patients presented with adverse events, with 46 (26.7%) showing a clinically
defined disease flare (no disease activity and patient reported outcomes
assessment were available); 24 patients interrupted SB5 permanently (among
them, 11 back-switched to ADA and 8 were prescribed a different biological
therapy). Probability of persistence on SB5 was 94.7% at 6 months and 85.1%
at 12 months. Baseline corticosteroid [hazard ratio (HR) 3.209, 95%
confidence interval (CI) 1.193–8.635, p = 0.021] and
therapy with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) (HR 2.876, 95% CI
1.229–6.727, p = 0.015), as well as the baseline
corticosteroid dose (HR 1.200, 95%CI 1.026–1.403,
p = 0.022) were predictors of drug interruption. Conclusion: Our data on persistence of treatment and adverse events are in line with
previous reports. Further large cohort studies may confirm baseline
corticosteroid and NSAIDs use as predictors of SB5 interruption, helping to
identify patients at higher risk of failure after switching.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cosimo Bruni
- Department Experimental and Clinical Medicine & Division of Rheumatology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, University of Florence, Via delle Oblate 4, Florence, 50141, Italy
- Department Experimental and Clinical Medicine & Division of Rheumatology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy
| | - Stefano Gentileschi
- Department of Medical Sciences, Surgery and Neurosciences, Rheumatology Unit, University of Siena, Siena, Italy
| | - Giovanni Pacini
- Department Experimental and Clinical Medicine & Division of Rheumatology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Marco Bardelli
- Department of Medical Sciences, Surgery and Neurosciences, Rheumatology Unit, University of Siena, Siena, Italy
| | - Lorenzo Tofani
- Department Experimental and Clinical Medicine & Division of Rheumatology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Francesca Bartoli
- Department Experimental and Clinical Medicine & Division of Rheumatology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Caterina Baldi
- Department of Medical Sciences, Surgery and Neurosciences, Rheumatology Unit, University of Siena, Siena, Italy
| | - Laura Cometi
- Department Experimental and Clinical Medicine & Division of Rheumatology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Ginevra Fiori
- Department Experimental and Clinical Medicine & Division of Rheumatology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Francesca Nacci
- Department Experimental and Clinical Medicine & Division of Rheumatology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Luca Cantarini
- Department of Medical Sciences, Surgery and Neurosciences, Rheumatology Unit, University of Siena, Siena, Italy
| | - Serena Guiducci
- Department Experimental and Clinical Medicine & Division of Rheumatology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Alberto Moggi-Pignone
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Division of Internal Medicine Unit III, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Careggi, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Bruno Frediani
- Department of Medical Sciences, Surgery and Neurosciences, Rheumatology Unit, University of Siena, Siena, Italy
| | - Marco Matucci-Cerinic
- Department Experimental and Clinical Medicine & Division of Rheumatology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
- Unit of Immunology, Rheumatology, Allergy and Rare diseases (UnIRAR), IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Maccora I, Lombardi N, Crescioli G, Bettiol A, Bonaiuti R, Pagnini I, Maniscalco V, Marrani E, Mastrolia MV, Ravaldi C, Consolini R, Cattalini M, Vannacci A, Simonini G. OBSIDIAn - real world evidence of Originator to BioSImilar Drug switch in juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2021; 61:1518-1528. [PMID: 34273158 DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/keab572] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2021] [Revised: 06/23/2021] [Accepted: 07/05/2021] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Limited data about use of biosimilars are available in children with Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis (JIA). This study therefore aimed to evaluate long-term efficacy and safety of switching from etanercept (ETA) and adalimumab (ADA) originators to their biosimilars, in children with JIA, in a real-world setting. METHODS This is a retro-prospective non-interventional multicentre Italian comparative cohort study. Medical charts of JIA children treated with biosimilars of ETA or ADA were included. Efficacy and safety of TNF-inhibitors therapy was evaluated at last follow-up during originator and at 3, 6 and 12 months following the switch to biosimilar. RESULTS 59 children (42 female, median age at onset 88 months) were treated with biosimilar of ETA (21) and ADA (38). Forty-five switched from the originator to the BIO (17 ETA, 28 ADA). At time of switch, 12/17 patients on ETA and 18/28 on ADA were in remission. No significant difference has been found at 3, 6 and 12 months after the switch. Ten patients discontinued biosimilars due to disease remission (4 ETA, 3 ADA), family willing (1 ETA), occurrence of burning at injection site (1 ETA), and persistent activity (1 ADA). No statistically significant difference was observed between originator and BIOs, nor between originator and BIOs, and between ADA and ETA in time to disease remission achievement, time to relapse and number of patients who experienced AE. CONCLUSION Our real-life results seem to confirm the efficacy and safety profile of switching from originator of ADA and ETA to their respective BIOs also in paediatric patients with JIA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ilaria Maccora
- Rheumatology Unit, Meyer Children's University Hospital; Florence, Italy.,Department of Neurosciences, Psychology, Drug Research and Child Health, University of Florence; Florence, Italy
| | - Niccolò Lombardi
- Department of Neurosciences, Psychology, Drug Research and Child Health, University of Florence; Florence, Italy.,Tuscan Regional Centre of Pharmacovigilance; Florence, Italy
| | - Giada Crescioli
- Department of Neurosciences, Psychology, Drug Research and Child Health, University of Florence; Florence, Italy.,Tuscan Regional Centre of Pharmacovigilance; Florence, Italy
| | - Alessandra Bettiol
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence; Florence, Italy
| | - Roberto Bonaiuti
- Department of Neurosciences, Psychology, Drug Research and Child Health, University of Florence; Florence, Italy
| | - Ilaria Pagnini
- Rheumatology Unit, Meyer Children's University Hospital; Florence, Italy
| | - Valerio Maniscalco
- Rheumatology Unit, Meyer Children's University Hospital; Florence, Italy
| | - Edoardo Marrani
- Rheumatology Unit, Meyer Children's University Hospital; Florence, Italy
| | - Maria Vincenza Mastrolia
- Rheumatology Unit, Meyer Children's University Hospital; Florence, Italy.,Department of Neurosciences, Psychology, Drug Research and Child Health, University of Florence; Florence, Italy
| | - Claudia Ravaldi
- PeaRL - Perinatal Research Laboratory, University of Florence and CiaoLapo Foundation for Perinatal Health; Florence, Italy
| | - Rita Consolini
- Section of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, Division of Pediatrics, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Marco Cattalini
- Pediatrics Clinic, ASST Spedali Civili di Brescia, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - Alfredo Vannacci
- Department of Neurosciences, Psychology, Drug Research and Child Health, University of Florence; Florence, Italy.,Tuscan Regional Centre of Pharmacovigilance; Florence, Italy.,PeaRL - Perinatal Research Laboratory, University of Florence and CiaoLapo Foundation for Perinatal Health; Florence, Italy
| | - Gabriele Simonini
- Rheumatology Unit, Meyer Children's University Hospital; Florence, Italy.,Department of Neurosciences, Psychology, Drug Research and Child Health, University of Florence; Florence, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Rathore AS, Stevenson JG, Chhabra H, Maharana C. The global landscape on interchangeability of biosimilars. Expert Opin Biol Ther 2021; 22:133-148. [PMID: 33567923 DOI: 10.1080/14712598.2021.1889511] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Biosimilars hold the potential to be an integral healthcare component that can significantly improve affordability and thereby accessibility of the otherwise expensive biotherapeutic products. Regulators, payors, and policymakers, each have a major role to play in successful adoption of biosimilars. One of the issues that has been a point of frequent discussion is that of interchangeability of biosimilars. AREAS COVERED This article aims to review the position that the major regulatory bodies have taken on interchangeability of biosimilars. Key issues that remain are also discussed. Adalimumab and etanercept have been chosen as real-world case studies to demonstrate interchangeability considerations. The need for gaining global harmonization on interchangeability is highlighted. EXPERT OPINION A global harmonization on the interchangeability can likely accelerate biosimilar adoption and result in better accessibility to biologics. Experience gained with real-world studies supports switching to biosimilars from originators however post-marketing pharmacovigilance should be in place to assess the risk-benefit profile of biosimilars in the long run.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anurag S Rathore
- Department of Chemical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology, Delhi, India
| | - James G Stevenson
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, University of Michigan College of Pharmacy, Ann Arbor, USA
| | - Hemlata Chhabra
- Department of Chemical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology, Delhi, India
| | - Chinmoyee Maharana
- Department of Chemical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology, Delhi, India
| |
Collapse
|