A New Optimized Percutaneous Access System for CIPII

Evolution of Insulin Delivery Devices: From Syringes, Pens, and Pumps to DIY Artificial Pancreas

The year 2021 will mark 100 years since the discovery of insulin. Insulin, the first medication to be discovered for diabetes, is still the safest and most potent glucose-lowering therapy. The major challenge of insulin despite its efficacy has been the occurrence of hypoglycemia, which has resulted in sub-optimal dosages being prescribed in the vast majority of patients. Popular devices used for insulin administration are syringes, pens, and pumps. An artificial pancreas (AP) with a closed-loop delivery system with > 95% time in range is believed to soon become a reality. The development of closed-loop delivery systems has gained momentum with recent advances in continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) and computer algorithms. This review discusses the evolution of syringes, disposable, durable pens and connected pens, needles, tethered and patch insulin pumps, bionic pancreas, alternate controller-enabled infusion (ACE) pumps, and do-it-yourself artificial pancreas systems (DIY-APS).

New Design of a Percutaneous Port System for Continuous Intraperitoneal Insulin Infusion

Insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus is treated with intensive insulin therapy using multiple daily injections or continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion with insulin pumps. For people with diabetes who cannot achieve acceptable glycemic control despite the use of intensive insulin therapy and continuous glucose measurement, there exists the possibility of continuous intraperitoneal insulin delivery via an implantable pump or a percutaneous port system that is connected to an external insulin pump. In this article, the current second generation of the Accu-Chek® DiaPort system for continuous intraperitoneal insulin delivery with its improvements over the former generation is presented and discussed.

Surgical options for glycaemic control in Type 1 diabetes

In recent years, bariatric surgery, also referred to as metabolic surgery, has become the most successful treatment option in those with Type 2 diabetes and obesity. There are some similarities in the pathological pathways in Type 1 and Type 2 diabetes, but the use of surgery in Type 1 diabetes remains unestablished and controversial. The treatment and management of Type 1 diabetes can be very challenging but recent advances in surgical interventions and technology has the potential to expand and optimize treatment options. This review discusses the current status of some surgical options available to people with Type 1 diabetes. These include implantable continuous glucose monitoring systems, continuous intraperitoneal insulin infusion pumps, closed-loop insulin delivery systems (also known as the artificial pancreas system) utilizing the latter two modalities of glucose monitoring and insulin delivery, and bariatric or metabolic surgery. Whole pancreas and islet transplantation are beyond the scope of this review but are briefly discussed.

Intraperitoneal insulin delivery provides superior glycaemic regulation to subcutaneous insulin delivery in model predictive control-based fully-automated artificial pancreas in patients with type 1 diabetes: a pilot study

AIMS

To compare intraperitoneal (IP) to subcutaneous (SC) insulin delivery in an artificial pancreas (AP).

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

Ten adults with type 1 diabetes participated in a non-randomized, non-blinded sequential AP study using the same SC glucose sensing and Zone Model Predictive Control (ZMPC) algorithm adjusted for insulin clearance. On first admission, subjects underwent closed-loop control with SC delivery of a fast-acting insulin analogue for 24 hours. Following implantation of a DiaPort IP insulin delivery system, the identical 24-hour trial was performed with IP regular insulin delivery. The clinical protocol included 3 unannounced meals with 70, 40 and 70 g carbohydrate, respectively. Primary endpoint was time spent with blood glucose (BG) in the range of 80 to 140 mg/dL (4.4-7.7 mmol/L).

RESULTS

Percent of time spent within the 80 to 140 mg/dL range was significantly higher for IP delivery than for SC delivery: 39.8 ± 7.6 vs 25.6 ± 13.1 ( P = .03). Mean BG (mg/dL) and percent of time spent within the broader 70 to 180 mg/dL range were also significantly better for IP insulin: 151.0 ± 11.0 vs 190.0 ± 31.0 ( P = .004) and 65.7 ± 9.2 vs 43.9 ± 14.7 ( P = .001), respectively. Superiority of glucose control with IP insulin came from the reduced time spent in hyperglycaemia (>180 mg/dL: 32.4 ± 8.9 vs 53.5 ± 17.4, P = .014; >250 mg/dL: 5.9 ± 5.6 vs 23.0 ± 11.3, P = .0004). Higher daily doses of insulin (IU) were delivered with the IP route (43.7 ± 0.1 vs 32.3 ± 0.1, P < .001) with no increased percent time spent <70 mg/dL (IP: 2.5 ± 2.9 vs SC: 4.1 ± 5.3, P = .42).

CONCLUSIONS

Glycaemic regulation with fully-automated AP delivering IP insulin was superior to that with SC insulin delivery. This pilot study provides proof-of-concept for an AP system combining a ZMPC algorithm with IP insulin delivery.

Analysis of "A New Optimized Percutaneous Access System for CIPII"

While only used initially in cases with resistance to subcutaneous insulin therapy, intraperitoneal insulin therapy provides an overall more stable glucose control than subcutaneous insulin therapy thanks to its pharmacokinetics as pointed by Garcia-Verdugo et al from the experience of implantable insulin pumps. The expansion of these devices has been limited by underdelivery issues and high cost. The availability of a new percutaneous access to intraperitoneal route could allow a similar glucose control with less constraints of follow-up and expected lower cost. Currently reported clinical experience does not allow a reliable assessment of its main risk of infection which could impair its sustained usability. Because intraperitoneal insulin could allow a fully automated closed-loop insulin delivery, a specific interest for its means of performance is relevant.