Does Continuous Diffusion of Oxygen Improve Diabetic Foot Ulcer Healing?

KADAM topical warm oxygen therapy device for diabetic foot ulcer-a novel approach

Purpose

Diabetic foot ulcer (DFU) is a significant healthcare burden demanding prompt attention. In the past decade, newer technologies such as topical oxygen therapy have grown increasingly popular. The purpose of the study was to determine effect of KADAM-a topical warm oxygen therapy (TWOT) medical device in healing of DFU.

Methods

The KADAM medical device developed by Yostra Labs Pvt Ltd, delivered pure oxygen between 93 ± 3% concentration at an optimal temperature range of 39-42º Celsius to DFU wound site.

Results

A total of 40 diabetic foot ulcer individuals, aged over 18 years were included in the study. Individuals with the Grade 1 DFU were 34 (85%), grade 2 were 5 (12.5%) and grade 3 were 1 (2.5%). The changes in initial area and final area for the various diabetic foot ulcer grades were as follows: 0.32 [0.12, 0.96] (< 0.001) for grade 1 ulcer, 0.76 [0.54, 1.17] (P = 0.013) for grade 2 ulcer and 1.26 for grade 3 ulcer. The percentage reduction in wound size achieved for the grade 1 & 2 DFU were 100%, and grade 3 was 75%.

Conclusion

Topical warm oxygen therapy serves as an adjunctive modality to facilitate diabetic foot ulcer healing in the clinical practice.

Therapeutic effect of continuous diffusion of oxygen therapy combined with traditional moist wound dressing therapy in the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers

AIMS

To investigate the therapeutic effect of continuous diffusion of oxygen (CDO) combined with traditional moist wound dressing (MWD) on the diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) inpatients.

METHODS

The inpatients from May 2016 to April 2018 were enrolled and randomly divided into MWD, CDO and combination treatment groups (n = 40 each group). The moist dressing was used in the MWD group while a micro-oxygen supply device was used in the CDO group. The combination treatment group was given both MWD and CDO. All patients were treated for 8 weeks. The wound healing, amputation rate, and inflammatory control were evaluated.

RESULTS

Compared with MWD and CDO groups, the combination group showed a higher wound healing rate (P < 0.05), lower white blood cell count (P < 0.05) and lower high-sensitivity C-reactive protein level (P < 0.05). During 1-year follow-up, the amputation rate was 0% in combination group, which was significantly lower than that in other two groups (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of MWD and CDO was effective in promoting healing and preventing infection of DFUs, which holds a potential to be a new strategy for the treatment of this critical clinical condition.