1
|
Visser MM, Vangoitsenhoven R, Gillard P, Mathieu C. Review Article - Diabetes Technology in the Hospital: An Update. Curr Diab Rep 2024:10.1007/s11892-024-01545-3. [PMID: 38842632 DOI: 10.1007/s11892-024-01545-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/29/2024] [Indexed: 06/07/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW There have been many developments in diabetes technology in recent years, with continuous glucose monitoring (CGM), insulin pump therapy (CSII) and automated insulin delivery (AID) becoming progressively accepted in outpatient diabetes care. However, the use of such advanced diabetes technology in the inpatient setting is still limited for several reasons, including logistical challenges and staff training needs. On the other hand, hospital settings with altered diet and stress-induced hyperglycemia often pose challenges to tight glycemic control using conventional treatment tools. Integrating smarter glucose monitoring and insulin delivery devices into the increasingly technical hospital environment could reduce diabetes-related morbidity and mortality. This narrative review describes the most recent literature on the use of diabetes technology in the hospital and suggests avenues for further research. RECENT FINDINGS Advanced diabetes technology has the potential to improve glycemic control in hospitalized people with and without diabetes, and could add particular value in certain conditions, such as nutrition therapy or perioperative management. Taken together, CGM allows for more accurate and patient-friendly follow-up and ad hoc titration of therapy. AID may also provide benefits, including improved glycemic control and reduced nursing workload. Before advanced diabetes technology can be used on a large scale in the hospital, further research is needed on efficacy, accuracy and safety, while implementation factors such as cost and staff training must also be overcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Pieter Gillard
- Department of Endocrinology, University Hospitals Leuven, Louvain, Belgium
| | - Chantal Mathieu
- Department of Endocrinology, University Hospitals Leuven, Louvain, Belgium.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Granados A, Carrillo Iregui A. Type 1 Diabetes Management in the Hospital Setting. Pediatr Rev 2024; 45:201-209. [PMID: 38556511 DOI: 10.1542/pir.2022-005645] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/02/2024]
Abstract
The incidence of diabetes in children and adolescents has increased during the past decades, with a 1.9% increase per year in type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM). Patients with diabetes have a greater risk of hospitalizations compared with those without diabetes. Clear evidence has emerged in the past decade that supports appropriate glycemic control in the hospital setting to improve clinical outcomes and reduce the risk of hospital complications and mortality. Determining the appropriate insulin regimen in patients with T1DM in the hospital depends on the clinical status, type of outpatient insulin regimen (multiple daily injections versus pump therapy), glycemic control before admission, nutritional status, procedures, and enteral versus parenteral nutrition. Due to the complexity of the inpatient management of diabetes, institutions should have an inpatient diabetes management team that includes dietitians, diabetes educators, nurses, pharmacists, social workers, and endocrinologists. The use of inpatient diabetes teams has been demonstrated to be beneficial in the management of patients with T1DM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Granados
- Division of Pediatric Endocrinology, Department of Pediatrics, Nicklaus Children's Hospital, Miami, FL
| | - Adriana Carrillo Iregui
- Division of Pediatric Endocrinology, Department of Pediatrics, Nicklaus Children's Hospital, Miami, FL
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Rajan N, Duggan EW, Abdelmalak BB, Butz S, Rodriguez LV, Vann MA, Joshi GP. Society for Ambulatory Anesthesia Updated Consensus Statement on Perioperative Blood Glucose Management in Adult Patients With Diabetes Mellitus Undergoing Ambulatory Surgery. Anesth Analg 2024:00000539-990000000-00802. [PMID: 38517760 DOI: 10.1213/ane.0000000000006791] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/24/2024]
Abstract
WHAT OTHER GUIDELINES ARE AVAILABLE ON THIS TOPIC Since the publication of the SAMBA Consensus Statement for perioperative blood glucose management in the ambulatory setting in 2010, several recent guidelines have been issued by the American Diabetes Association (ADA), the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists (AACE), the Endocrine Society, the Centre for Perioperative Care (CPOC), and the Association of Anaesthetists of Great Britain and Ireland (AAGBI) on DM care in hospitalized patients; however, none are specific to ambulatory surgery. HOW DOES THIS GUIDELINE DIFFER FROM THE PREVIOUS GUIDELINES Previously posed clinical questions that were outdated were revised to reflect current clinical practice. Additional questions were developed relating to the perioperative management of patients with DM to include the newer therapeutic interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Niraja Rajan
- From the Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Penn State Health, Hershey Outpatient Surgery Center, Hershey, Pennsylvania
| | - Elizabeth W Duggan
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, University of Alabama Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
| | - Basem B Abdelmalak
- Departments of General Anesthesiology and Outcomes Research, Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University, Anesthesia for Bronchoscopic Surgery, Anesthesiology Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Steven Butz
- Department of Anesthesiology, Division of Pediatric Anesthesiology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Children's Wisconsin Surgicenter, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
| | - Leopoldo V Rodriguez
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Boulder Valley Anesthesiology PLLC, UCHealth Longs Peak Hospital and Surgery Center, Boulder Community Health, Foothills Hospital, Boulder, Colorado
| | - Mary Ann Vann
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Girish P Joshi
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Management, University of Texas Southwestern Medical School, Dallas, Texas
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
ElSayed NA, Aleppo G, Bannuru RR, Bruemmer D, Collins BS, Ekhlaspour L, Hilliard ME, Johnson EL, Khunti K, Lingvay I, Matfin G, McCoy RG, Perry ML, Pilla SJ, Polsky S, Prahalad P, Pratley RE, Segal AR, Seley JJ, Stanton RC, Gabbay RA. 7. Diabetes Technology: Standards of Care in Diabetes-2024. Diabetes Care 2024; 47:S126-S144. [PMID: 38078575 PMCID: PMC10725813 DOI: 10.2337/dc24-s007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2023]
Abstract
The American Diabetes Association (ADA) "Standards of Care in Diabetes" includes the ADA's current clinical practice recommendations and is intended to provide the components of diabetes care, general treatment goals and guidelines, and tools to evaluate quality of care. Members of the ADA Professional Practice Committee, an interprofessional expert committee, are responsible for updating the Standards of Care annually, or more frequently as warranted. For a detailed description of ADA standards, statements, and reports, as well as the evidence-grading system for ADA's clinical practice recommendations and a full list of Professional Practice Committee members, please refer to Introduction and Methodology. Readers who wish to comment on the Standards of Care are invited to do so at professional.diabetes.org/SOC.
Collapse
|
5
|
Gómez Medina AM, Henao-Carrillo DC, Yepes C, Silva J, Gómez González JA, Cortes D, Robledo S, Mejía G, Rondon M. Glycemic control metrics in a cohort of hospitalized patients with type 1 diabetes using hybrid closed-loop and advanced hybrid closed-loop systems. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2023; 204:110897. [PMID: 37678728 DOI: 10.1016/j.diabres.2023.110897] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/11/2023] [Revised: 08/25/2023] [Accepted: 09/04/2023] [Indexed: 09/09/2023]
Abstract
AIMS To describe Hybrid closed-loop (HCL) and advanced hybrid closed-loop (AHCL) performance in the hospital setting based on the continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) metrics description. METHODS This was an observational study from a cohort of patients with T1D using HCL/AHCL with history of hospitalization. CGM metrics were analyzed during the hospital stay. CGM metrics sub-analysis of the population with active Automated Mode (AM) and SmartGuard (SG) during hospitalization and/or surgical procedure was performed. RESULTS Twenty-four patients were included (50 % women; mean age, 49 years [inter-quartile range (IQR), 39-62 years]). During hospitalization 70.8 % patients achieved %Time in Range (TIR) between 70 and 180 mg/dL ≥ 70 %. The overall %TIR was 75.5 % (IQR, 67.3-81.5 %), % time below range (TBR) < 70 mg/dL was 2.1 % (IQR, 0.7-5.4 %) and %TBR < 54 mg/dL was 0 % (IQR, 0-5.4 %). Users of the AHCL with active SG achieved a non-significant higher %TIR during hospitalization (79 % [73.8.88 %] vs. 76 % [72.81 %], p = 0.312) and had a shorter stay (3[IQR, 2.4] vs. 6 days[IQR, 5.7], p = 0.045) compared to the users of the HCL with AM active. No device-related serious adverse events occurred for users of either system. CONCLUSIONS HCL/AHCL systems with active AM/SG in patients with T1D in the hospital environment leads to %TIR > 70 % in ranges of 70-180 mg/dL in patients without increasing hypoglycemia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ana María Gómez Medina
- Endocrinology Unit, Hospital Universitario San Ignacio, Carrera 7 # 45-62, Colombia; Faculty of Medicine, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Carrera 7 # 40-62, Colombia.
| | - Diana Cristina Henao-Carrillo
- Endocrinology Unit, Hospital Universitario San Ignacio, Carrera 7 # 45-62, Colombia; Faculty of Medicine, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Carrera 7 # 40-62, Colombia.
| | - Carlos Yepes
- Endocrinology Unit, Hospital Universitario San Ignacio, Carrera 7 # 45-62, Colombia; Faculty of Medicine, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Carrera 7 # 40-62, Colombia.
| | - Julio Silva
- Endocrinology Unit, Hospital Universitario San Ignacio, Carrera 7 # 45-62, Colombia; Faculty of Medicine, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Carrera 7 # 40-62, Colombia.
| | - Javier Alberto Gómez González
- Endocrinology Unit, Hospital Universitario San Ignacio, Carrera 7 # 45-62, Colombia; Faculty of Medicine, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Carrera 7 # 40-62, Colombia.
| | - David Cortes
- Endocrinology Unit, Hospital Universitario San Ignacio, Carrera 7 # 45-62, Colombia; Faculty of Medicine, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Carrera 7 # 40-62, Colombia.
| | - Sofia Robledo
- Faculty of Medicine, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Carrera 7 # 40-62, Colombia.
| | - Gabriela Mejía
- Faculty of Medicine, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Carrera 7 # 40-62, Colombia.
| | - Martin Rondon
- Department of Epidemiology, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Carrera 7 # 40-62, Colombia.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Griffin TP, Gallen G, Hartnell S, Crabtree T, Holloway M, Gibb FW, Lumb A, Wilmot EG, Choudhary P, Hussain S. UK's Association of British Clinical Diabetologist's Diabetes Technology Network (ABCD-DTN): Best practice guide for hybrid closed-loop therapy. Diabet Med 2023; 40:e15078. [PMID: 36932929 DOI: 10.1111/dme.15078] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2023] [Revised: 02/27/2023] [Accepted: 02/28/2023] [Indexed: 03/19/2023]
Abstract
This best practice guide is written with the aim of providing an overview of current hybrid closed-loop (HCL) systems in use within the United Kingdom's (UK) National Health Service (NHS) and to provide education and advice for their management on both an individual and clinical service level. The environment of diabetes technology, and particularly HCL systems, is rapidly evolving. The past decade has seen unprecedented advances in the development of HCL systems. These systems improve glycaemic outcomes and reduce the burden of treatment for people with type 1 diabetes (pwT1D). It is anticipated that access to these systems will increase in England as a result of updates in National Institute of Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidance providing broader support for the use of real-time continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) for pwT1D. NICE is currently undertaking multiple-technology appraisal into HCL systems. Based on experience from centres involved in supporting advanced technologies as well as from the recent NHS England HCL pilot, this guide is intended to provide healthcare professionals with UK expert consensus on the best practice for initiation, optimisation and ongoing management of HCL therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tomás P Griffin
- Leicester Diabetes Centre, University Hospitals of Leicester, Leicester, UK
- Diabetes Research Centre, College of Health Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
- School of Medicine, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland
- Centre for Diabetes and Endocrinology, University Hospital Limerick, Limerick, Ireland
| | - Geraldine Gallen
- Department of Diabetes, School of Cardiovascular, Metabolic Medicine and Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Sara Hartnell
- Department of Diabetes and Endocrinology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Thomas Crabtree
- University Hospitals of Derby and Burton NHS Foundation Trust, Derby, UK
- Translational Medical Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | | | - Fraser W Gibb
- Edinburgh Centre for Endocrinology & Diabetes, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Alistair Lumb
- Oxford Centre for Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolism, Oxford, UK
- Oxford NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford, UK
| | - Emma G Wilmot
- University Hospitals of Derby and Burton NHS Foundation Trust, Derby, UK
- Translational Medical Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Pratik Choudhary
- Leicester Diabetes Centre, University Hospitals of Leicester, Leicester, UK
- Diabetes Research Centre, College of Health Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
| | - Sufyan Hussain
- Department of Diabetes, School of Cardiovascular, Metabolic Medicine and Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
- Department of Diabetes and Endocrinology, Guy's & St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Lumb A, Misra S, Rayman G, Avari P, Flanagan D, Choudhary P, Dhatariya K. Variation in the Current Use of Technology to Support Diabetes Management in UK Hospitals: Results of a Survey of Health Care Professionals. J Diabetes Sci Technol 2023; 17:733-741. [PMID: 36949718 DOI: 10.1177/19322968231161076] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/24/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There has been a significant increase in the use of wearable diabetes technologies in the outpatient setting over recent years, but this has not consistently translated into inpatient use. METHODS An online survey was undertaken to understand the current use of technology to support inpatient diabetes care in the United Kingdom. RESULTS Responses were received from 42 different organizations representing 104 hospitals across the United Kingdom. Significant variation was found between organizations in the use of technology to support safe, effective inpatient diabetes care. Benefits of the use of technology were reported, and areas of good practice identified. CONCLUSION Technology supports good inpatient diabetes care, but there is currently variation in its use. Guidance has been developed which should drive improvements in the use of technology and hence improvements in the safety and effectiveness of inpatient diabetes care. Key recommendations include implementation of this guidance (especially for continuous glucose monitoring), ensuring specialist support is available for the use of wearable diabetes technology in hospital, optimizing information sharing across the health care system, and making full use of data from networked glucose and ketone meters.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alistair Lumb
- Oxford Centre for Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolism, Churchill Hospital, Oxford, UK
| | - Shivani Misra
- Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, London, UK
- Department of Diabetes and Endocrinology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Gerry Rayman
- Ipswich Diabetes Centre, East Suffolk and North Essex NHS Foundation Trust, Ipswich, UK
| | - Parizad Avari
- Department of Diabetes and Endocrinology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Daniel Flanagan
- Department of Endocrinology, University Hospital Plymouth, Plymouth, UK
| | - Pratik Choudhary
- Diabetes Research Centre, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
| | - Ketan Dhatariya
- Elsie Bertram Diabetes Centre, Norfolk and Norwich University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Norwich, UK
- Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
| |
Collapse
|