Placental Histopathology Differences and Neonatal Outcome in Dichorionic-Diamniotic as Compared to Monochorionic-Diamniotic Twin Pregnancies

Outcomes of dichorionic twin pregnancies with fused versus separate placentas

PURPOSE

In a certain proportion of dichorionic twin pregnancies, the two placentas are fused. The clinical significance of this finding remains unclear. Our objective was to compare outcomes of dichorionic twin pregnancies with fused versus separate placentas as determined on first-trimester ultrasound.

METHODS

Retrospective study of patients with dichorionic twins followed at a tertiary center between 2014 and 2022. The co-primary outcomes were fetal growth restriction and preeclampsia. Associations between fused placentas and the study outcomes were estimated using multivariable Poisson regression and were reported as adjusted relative risk (aRR) with a 95%-confidence interval (CI).

RESULTS

Of the 328 eligible patients, 175 (53.4%) and 153 (46.6%) had fused and separate placentas, respectively. Compared with pregnancies with separate placentas, patients with fused placentas had a lower risk of preeclampsia [aRR 0.48 (95%-CI 0.24-0.97)] but a higher risk of fetal growth restriction [aRR 1.23 (95%-CI 1.02-1.48)] and admission to the neonatal intensive care unit [aRR 1.31 (95%-CI 1.01-1.71)]. In addition, pregnancies with fused placentas were more likely to have a total placental weight below the 10th percentile than those with separate placentas [aRR 1.93 (95%-CI 1.16-3.21)].

DISCUSSION

Dichorionic twin pregnancies with fused placentas have a lower risk of preeclampsia but are more likely to be complicated by fetal growth restriction, observations that may be attributed to the lower total placentas mass in pregnancies with fused compared with separate placentas. Fused placentas can be used as a potential biomarker for the prediction of pregnancy complications in dichorionic twin pregnancies.

Pregnancy outcomes of monochorionic diamniotic and dichorionic diamniotic twin pregnancies conceived by assisted reproductive technology and conceived naturally: a study based on chorionic comparison

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate monochorionic diamniotic (MCDA) and dichorionic diamniotic (DCDA) twin pregnancies conceived by assisted reproductive technology (ART) and conceived naturally.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the data on twin pregnancies conceived by ART from January 2015 to January 2022,and compared pregnancy outcomes of MCDA and DCDA twins conceived by ART with those of MCDA and DCDA twins conceived naturally, pregnancy outcomes between MCDA and DCDA twins conceived by ART, and pregnancy outcomes of DCT and TCT pregnancies reduced to DCDA pregnancies with those of DCDA pregnancies conceived naturally.

RESULT

MCDA pregnancies conceived by ART accounted for 4.21% of the total pregnancies conceived by ART and 43.81% of the total MCDA pregnancies. DCDA pregnancies conceived by ART accounted for 95.79% of the total pregnancies conceived by ART and 93.26% of the total DCDA pregnancies. Women with MCDA pregnancies conceived by ART had a higher premature delivery rate, lower neonatal weights, a higher placenta previa rate, and a lower twin survival rate than those with MCDA pregnancies conceived naturally (all p < 0.05). Women with DCDA pregnancies conceived naturally had lower rates of preterm birth, higher neonatal weights, and higher twin survival rates than women with DCDA pregnancies conceived by ART and those with DCT and TCT pregnancies reduced to DCDA pregnancies (all p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Our study confirms that the pregnancy outcomes of MCDA pregnancies conceived by ART are worse than those of MCDA pregnancies conceived naturally. Similarly, the pregnancy outcomes of naturally-conceived DCDA pregnancies are better than those of DCDA pregnancies conceived by ART and DCT and TCT pregnancies reduced to DCDA pregnancies.

Clinical Study on Different Delivery Methods of Twin Pregnancy

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the effect of different methods of delivery on the outcome of twin pregnancies.

STUDY DESIGN

This is a retrospective cohort review of 627 twin pregnancies with delivery from January 2016 to December 2019. According to the clinical guidelines for cesarean section, the cesarean section and vaginal delivery groups were determined. Finally, the baseline information, delivery method, pregnancy outcome, and maternal and infant complications of the two groups were compared.

RESULTS

For different delivery methods, the incidence of preeclampsia was significantly higher in the cesarean section group than in the vaginal delivery group (X 2 = 4.405, p < 0.05). There were 23 fetal growth ratios (FGR) in the cesarean section group, which were significantly higher than the vaginal delivery group (X 2 = 4.740, p < 0.05). However, the incidence of preterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROM) in the vaginal delivery group was significantly higher than in the cesarean section group (X 2 = 5.235, p < 0.05). In addition, the volume of postpartum bleeding in the vaginal delivery group was significantly higher than in the cesarean section group (t = 4.723, p < 0.001). The neonatal weights and 5-minute Apgar scores of the vaginal delivery group were lower than the cesarean section group, and the difference was statistically significant. In the vaginal delivery group, 48 and 26 neonates were transferred to the intensive care and neonatal units, respectively, which were significantly higher than in the cesarean section group (X 2 = 5.001, p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The major complications of a twin pregnancy are gestational diabetes mellitus and PPROM. Cesarean section can reduce the rate of neonatal asphyxia in twins and improve the pregnancy outcome.

KEY POINTS

· Twin pregnancy.. · Delivery methods.. · Pregnancy outcomes..

Chorionicity-associated variation in metabolic phenotype of cord blood in twin

BACKGROUND

Monochorionic (MC) twins present a higher incidence of unfavorable clinical perinatal outcomes than dichorionic (DC) twins, often in association with placental vascular anastomosis. In this study, we profiled the umbilical cord plasma metabolomes of uncomplicated MC and DC twin pregnancies and related these to several offspring outcomes, previously associated with birthweight.

METHODS

Umbilical vein blood samples were collected at birth from 25 pairs of uncomplicated MC twins and 24 pairs of uncomplicated DC twins. The samples were subjected to gas chromatography-mass spectrometry-based metabolomics. 152 metabolites were identified from the cord plasma samples of MC and DC twins. Partial least squares discriminant analysis and pathway analysis were performed to compare within DC/MC twin pairs and between DC and MC twins. A generalized estimating equation (GEE) model was utilized to explore the correlation between metabolic differences and birthweight discordance within and between twin pairs.

RESULTS

Our study revealed clear differences between the metabolite profiles of umbilical cord plasma of MC and DC twins. Metabolite profiles in MC within twin pairs and DC within twin pairs were characterized by the differences in 2 - hydroxyglutaramic acid levels and nicotinamide levels, respectively. The metabolic pathways of GSH, tryptophan, and fatty acid metabolism, were significantly downregulated in MC twins compared to DC twins. In addition, the concentration of caffeine and decamethyl-cyclopentasiloxane (D5) was positively correlated with birthweight in MC and DC twins.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrated that the altered metabolites in umbilical plasma made contributions to the different chorionicities between uncomplicated MC twins and DC twins. The chorionicity of twins seems to affect the metabolic cross-talk between co-twin pairs and be related to birthweight discordance of twins.

Comparison of Prenatal and Neonatal Outcomes of Selective Fetal Growth Restriction in Monochorionic Twin Pregnancies with or Without Twin-to-Twin Transfusion Syndrome After Radiofrequency Ablation

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to investigate and compare the prenatal and neonatal outcomes of monochorionic twin pregnancies complicated with fetal growth restriction (sFGR) with or without twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome (TTTS) after cord occlusion by radiofrequency ablation (RFA).

METHODS

This prospective cross-sectional study was conducted in women with monochorionic twin pregnancies of 16 to 26 weeks of gestational age (GA) in an academic hospital from 2016 to 2020. Demographic and obstetrical characteristics such as cervical length, GA of RFA and delivery, amnioreduction, cesarean section (C/S) rate, and maximum vertical pocket as well as prenatal, neonatal, and maternal outcomes were evaluated and compared between groups using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS). Mann-Whitney U test or independent t test was used for quantitative data and Chi square test was applied for comparing qualitative variables. The significance level of tests was 0.05.

RESULTS

Totally 213 (106 sFGR and 107 TTTS+sFGR) cases were enrolled. The mean of maternal age (P=0.787), body mass index (P=0.932), gestational age at RFA (P=0.265), as well as gestational age of delivery (P=0.482), and C/S rate (P=0.124) were not significant between the two groups, but a significant difference (P<0.001) in cervical length was observed between the two groups. No significant differences were found in newborn and fetal outcomes such as fetal demise (P=0.827), PPROM (P=0.233), abortion (P=0.088), and admission to intensive care unit (P=0.822) between the groups.

CONCLUSION

Although worse fetal and neonatal outcomes were expected in the TTTS+sFGR group after RFA, no significant difference was observed between groups.

Pregnancy and obstetric outcomes of dichorionic and trichorionic triamniotic triplet pregnancy with multifetal pregnancy reduction: a retrospective analysis study

Background

It is generally beneficial for triplet gestation or high-order multiple pregnancies to operate multifetal pregnancy reduction (MFPR) after assisted reproductive techniques. However, data on pregnancy outcomes is lacking regarding dichorionic triamniotic (DCTA) and trichorionic triplets (TCTA) pregnancy.

Method

This research analyzes the difference between 128 DCTA and 179 TCTA pregnancies with or without MFPR after in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles between January 2015 and June 2020. The subdivided subgroups of the two groups are reduction to singleton, reduction to dichorionic twins, and expectant management groups. We also compare the pregnancy and obstetric outcomes between 2104 dichorionic twins and 122 monochorionic twins.

Result

The research subgroups were DCTA to monochorionic singleton pregnancies (n = 76), DCTA to dichorionic twin pregnancies (n = 18), DCTA-expectant management (n = 34), TCTA to monochorionic singleton pregnancies (n = 31), TCTA to dichorionic twin pregnancies (n = 130), and TCTA-expectant management (n = 18). In DCTA-expectant management group, the complete miscarriage rate is dramatically higher, and the survival rate and the rate of take-home babies are lower. However, there was no difference between the rates of complete miscarriages, survival rates, and take-home babies in TCTA-expectant management group. But the complete miscarriage rate of DCTA-expectant management was obviously higher than that of TCTA-expectant management group (29.41 vs. 5.56%, p = 0.044). For obstetric outcomes, MFPR to singleton group had higher gestational week and average birth weight, but lower premature delivery, gestational hypertension rates and low birth weight in both DCTA and TCTA pregnancy groups (all p < 0.05). DCTA to monochorionic singleton had the lowest incidence of gestational diabetes, whereas The subdivided subgroups of TCTA had no significant difference in the incidence of gestational diabetes. Monochorionic twins have higher rates of complete, early, and late miscarriage, premature delivery, and late premature delivery, and lower survival rate (p < 0.05).

Conclusion

MFPR could improve gestational week and average birth weight, reducing premature delivery, LBW, and gestational hypertension rates in DCTA and TCTA pregnancies. Monochorionic twins have worse pregnancy and obstetric outcomes. MFPR to singleton is preferable recommended in the pregnancy and obstetric management of complex triplets with monochorionic pair.

Ultrasound in the prediction of birthweight discordance in dichorionic twins

INTRODUCTION

Large birthweight discrepancy has been identified as a risk factor for perinatal morbidity and mortality in twin pregnancies. However, it remains unclear whether such discordance can be predicted by various biological indices with specific cut-off values, and how these depend on the gestational age. We aimed to determine the most effective way to predict large birthweight discordance at various gestational ages.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A retrospective cohort study of dichorionic twins, live-born between 2008 and 2018, was conducted. Discordances in biparietal diameter, head circumference, humerus and femur length, abdominal circumference, and estimated fetal weight were calculated-([larger twin - smaller twin] / larger twin) × 100%-and compared between those with and without a large birthweight discordance (≥20%). Receiver operating characteristic curves were constructed to analyze the predictive characteristics of each parameter.

RESULTS

Of 598 dichorionic twin pregnancies included, 83 (13.9%) had a birthweight discordance ≥20%. Group differences in biparietal diameter and head circumference discordance were the earliest to emerge (before 20 weeks of gestation), but became insignificant after 36 weeks, followed by humerus and femur length, estimated fetal weight discordance (after 20 weeks), and abdominal circumference discordance (after 28 weeks). The best predictors (with cut-off values) were discordance in biparietal diameter ≥7.8% at <20 weeks, head circumference ≥4.5% at 20-23⁺⁶  weeks, humerus length ≥4.5% at 24-27⁺⁶  weeks, and estimated fetal weight discordance (≥11.6% at 28-31⁺⁶  weeks, ≥10.5% at 32-35⁺⁶  weeks, and ≥15.0% ≥36 weeks), with sensitivity and specificity of 52%-77% and 69%-82%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Different predictors and cut-off values may be useful for predicting large inter-twin birthweight discordance in dichorionic twins at different gestational ages. It is more accurate to use biparietal diameter and head circumference discordance in the early second trimester, humerus length discordance in the late second trimester, and estimated fetal weight discordance in the third trimester.

Fused placentas: Till birth do us part

Twinning and placental fusion occur at a low frequency in species like humans and mice. They are linked to reduced birth weight and intertwin growth discrepancy with important consequences for perinatal survival. Despite this, little is known about the histological characteristics of the twin or fused placenta and how these relate to fetal growth. In this case report, we characterise the histological changes of a fused mouse placenta showing intertwin growth discrepancy. Our study demonstrates that morphological changes in the placental exchange and endocrine regions and elevated calcification levels may contribute to the intertwin growth discrepancy observed in mouse pregnancy.

Early Onset Preeclampsia Diagnosis Prior to the 20th Week of Gestation in a Twin Pregnancy Managed via Selective Reduction of an Intrauterine Growth Restriction Fetus: A Case Report and Literature Review

A single, healthy, 44-year-old perimenopausal woman pursuing a pregnancy, employed donor embryos, resulting to a dichorionic diamniotic twin pregnancy. In the 18th week of gestation severe symptoms indicated early onset preeclampsia reporting severe hypertension (BP 180/90 mmHg), intense headaches and nausea as well as elevated 24-h urine protein levels (1.5 g/day). Concurrently diagnosis of an IUGR fetus was concluded. Standard pharmaceutical administration for treating preeclampsia was ordered. Persistence of symptoms indicated recommendation for pregnancy termination, however the patient opted against this. Selective embryo reduction was performed as the last resort prior to pregnancy termination. Following selective reduction the headaches and nausea were successfully subdued and the patient’s blood pressure was adjusted (mean BP 130/80 mmHg). This enabled further progression of pregnancy for an impressive 11 week-period, and a live birth on the 30th week. To conclude, only a few rare cases have been reported with diagnosis of early onset preeclampsia prior to the 20th week mark and none report live births. Albeit termination of pregnancy was recommended, the management of selective reduction of the IUGR fetus enabled successful treatment of preeclampsia coupled by a live birth of a healthy infant without any perinatal or postnatal complications reported.

Maternal ABVD chemotherapy for Hodgkin lymphoma in a dichorionic diamniotic pregnancy: a case report

Background

Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) is the most common hematological malignancy during pregnancy. The first-line treatment for HL in pregnancy is the standard ABVD regimen without any drug and/or dose adjustment. However, data on chemotherapy during twin pregnancies are sparse, and a better understanding of the mechanisms involved in exposure to and the toxic effects of anticancer drugs in the fetuses is needed.

Case presentation

A 41-year-old dichorionic diamniotic pregnant patient was given ABVD treatment for HL at a gestational age of 28 weeks and 3 days. The patient received 2 cycles of chemotherapy with a 15-day therapeutic window including an actual 25 mg/m² dose of doxorubicin per cycle. Unlike the female twin, the male twin presented four days after birth a left cardiac dysfunction. Doxorubicin cardiotoxicity in the male newborn was also supported by high blood levels of troponin. At one month of age, echocardiography findings were normal. We investigated literature data on physiological aspects of pregnancy that may influence doxorubicin pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic data on the use of doxorubicin in pregnancy. We detailed the role of the transporters in doxorubicin placenta distribution, and tried to understand why only one fetus was affected.

Conclusions

Fetal safety depends at least on maternal doxorubicin pharmacokinetics.Because of drug interactions (i.e. drug metabolism and drug transport), care should always be taken to avoid maternal pharmacokinetic variability. The toxic effects were discrepant between the dizygotic twins, suggesting additional fetus-specific pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic factors in doxorubicin toxicity.

Optimal delivery timing for dizygotic twins - the short- and long-term perspective

Major obstetrics and gynecology societies offer inconsistent recommendation regarding optimal delivery timing in uncomplicated dizygotic twins. We sought to investigate the impact of delivery timing within term gestation, in dizygotic twins, on the short- and long-term offspring morbidity. A prospectively analyzed cohort of dizygotic twin deliveries was conducted. All women delivered at a regional tertiary medical center, at term (≥37 0/7), between the years 1991 and 2014, were included. The primary exposure was delivery at 37 0/7-37 + 6/7 weeks, while delivery at ≥38 0/7 weeks' gestation was considered the reference. Neonatal short- and long-term outcomes according to hospitalizations of offspring up to 18 years of age due to cardiac, respiratory, hematological, neurological, and infectious morbidity were compared. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were used to compare cumulative incidences per each major-system hospitalization. Cox regression models were used to estimate the adjusted hazard ratios, while adjusting for variables with clinical importance. During the study period, 612 dizygotic twin deliveries met the inclusion criteria. Of them, 200 (31.3%) occurred at 37-37 6/7 weeks, and 412 (68.7%) occurred at ≥38 0/7 weeks' gestation. In the long-term analysis, rates of hospitalizations involving several major morbidity categories exhibited comparable rates in both groups. The Cox regression models did not demonstrate an independent association between gestational age within term and later major pediatric morbidity in offspring (total long-term morbidity: adjusted hazard ratio 1.33, 95% confidence interval 0.77-2.29). Dizygotic twin deliveries occurring at different gestational ages within term do not appear to significantly impact on major short- and long-term outcomes.

SMFM Special Statement: State of the science on multifetal gestations: unique considerations and importance

We sought to review the state of the science for research on multiple gestations. A literature search was performed with the use of PubMed for studies to quantify the representation of multiple gestations for a sample period (2012-2016) that were limited to phase III and IV randomized controlled trials, that were written in English, and that addressed at least 1 of 4 major pregnancy complications: fetal growth restriction or small-for-gestational-age fetus, gestational diabetes mellitus, preeclampsia, and preterm delivery. Of the 226 studies that are included in the analysis, multiple pregnancies were most represented in studies of preterm delivery: 17% of trials recruited both singleton and multiple pregnancies; another 18% of trials recruited only multiple pregnancies. For trials that studied preeclampsia, fetal growth restriction, and gestational diabetes mellitus, 17%, 8%, and 2%, respectively, recruited both singleton and multiple gestations. None of the trials on these 3 topics were limited to women with a multiple pregnancy. Women with a multiple pregnancy are at risk for complications similar to those of women with singleton pregnancies, but their risk is usually higher. Also, the pathophysiologic condition for some complications differs in multiple gestations from those that occur in singleton gestations. Conditions that are unique to multiple pregnancies include excess placenta, placental crowding or inability of the uteroplacental unit to support the normal growth of multiple fetuses, or suboptimal placental implantation sites with an increased risk of abnormal placental location. Other adverse outcomes in multiple gestations are also influenced by twin-specific risk factors, most notably chorionicity. Although twins have been well represented in many studies of preterm birth, these studies have failed to identify adequate predictive tests (short cervical length established over 2 decades ago remains the single best predictor), to establish effective interventions, and to differentiate the underlying pathophysiologic condition of twin preterm birth. Questions about fetal growth also remain. Twin growth deviates from that of singleton gestations starting at approximately 32 weeks of gestation; however, research with long-term follow-up is needed to better distinguish pathologic and physiologic growth deviations, which include growth discordance among pairs (or more). There are virtually no clinical trials that are specific to twins for gestational diabetes mellitus or preeclampsia, and subgroups for multiple pregnancies in existing trials are not large enough to allow definite conclusions. Another important area is the determination of appropriate maternal nutrition or micronutrient supplementation to optimize pregnancy and child health. There are also unique aspects to consider for research design in multiple gestations, such as designation and tracking of the correct fetus prenatally and through delivery. The correct statistical methods must be used to account for correlated data because multiple fetuses share the same mother and intrauterine environment. In summary, multiple gestations often are excluded from research studies, despite a disproportionate contribution to national rates of perinatal morbidity, mortality, and health-care costs. It is important to consider the enrollment of multifetal pregnancies in studies that target mainly women with singleton gestations, even when sample size is inadequate, so that insights that are specific to multiple gestations can be obtained when results of smaller studies are pooled together. The care of pregnant women with multiple gestations presents unique challenges; unfortunately, evidence-based clinical management that includes the diagnosis and treatment of common obstetrics problems are not well-defined for this population.