Prognostic Factors in Elderly Patients With Guillain-Barré Syndrome: Does Age Matter?

Guidelines for Neuroprognostication in Adults with Guillain-Barré Syndrome

BACKGROUND

Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) often carries a favorable prognosis. Of adult patients with GBS, 10-30% require mechanical ventilation during the acute phase of the disease. After the acute phase, the focus shifts to restoration of motor strength, ambulation, and neurological function, with variable speed and degree of recovery. The objective of these guidelines is to provide recommendations on the reliability of select clinical predictors that serve as the basis of neuroprognostication and provide guidance to clinicians counseling adult patients with GBS and/or their surrogates.

METHODS

A narrative systematic review was completed using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology. Candidate predictors, including clinical variables and prediction models, were selected based on clinical relevance and presence of appropriate body of evidence. The Population/Intervention/Comparator/Outcome/Time frame/Setting (PICOTS) question was framed as follows: "When counseling patients or surrogates of critically ill patients with Guillain-Barré syndrome, should [predictor, with time of assessment if appropriate] be considered a reliable predictor of [outcome, with time frame of assessment]?" Additional full-text screening criteria were used to exclude small and lower quality studies. Following construction of an evidence profile and summary of findings, recommendations were based on four GRADE criteria: quality of evidence, balance of desirable and undesirable consequences, values and preferences, and resource use. In addition, good practice recommendations addressed essential principles of neuroprognostication that could not be framed in PICOTS format.

RESULTS

Eight candidate clinical variables and six prediction models were selected. A total of 45 articles met our eligibility criteria to guide recommendations. We recommend bulbar weakness (the degree of motor weakness at disease nadir) and the Erasmus GBS Respiratory Insufficiency Score as moderately reliable for prediction of the need for mechanical ventilation. The Erasmus GBS Outcome Score (EGOS) and modified EGOS were identified as moderately reliable predictors of independent ambulation at 3 months and beyond. Good practice recommendations include consideration of both acute and recovery phases of the disease during prognostication, discussion of the possible need for mechanical ventilation and enteral nutrition during counseling, and consideration of the complete clinical condition as opposed to a single variable during prognostication.

CONCLUSIONS

These guidelines provide recommendations on the reliability of predictors of the need for mechanical ventilation, poor functional outcome, and independent ambulation following GBS in the context of counseling patients and/or surrogates and suggest broad principles of neuroprognostication. Few predictors were considered moderately reliable based on the available body of evidence, and higher quality data are needed.

Characteristics of Guillain-Barré syndrome in super-elderly individuals

BACKGROUND

Japan has the world's largest super-aging population, and the number of elderly patients with various diseases is increasing. Herein, we reported the characteristics of super-elderly patients, aged over 80 years, with Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS), a typical neuroimmune disease.

METHODS

During the period 2019-2021, 74 patients over the age of 80 years diagnosed with GBS at Kindai university were analyzed as the super-elderly group patients. The control group comprised 74 consecutive patients aged < 79 years, under the same conditions. GBS was diagnosed using Brighton diagnostic criteria. Electrophysiology was assessed using the Ho criteria.

RESULTS

The mean age was 83.5 years in the super-elderly group and 51.7 years in the control group. Prior infection was recognized in 50% of cases in the super-elderly group and 77% of cases in the control group with fewer cases in the super-elderly group. The mean number of days until peak symptom presentation was longer in the super-elderly group. The percentage who required a ventilator was significantly higher among the super-elderly group than among the control group. Hughes functional grading scale was more severe in the super-elderly group. Electrophysiological examination revealed the demyelinating form was particularly common in the super-elderly group. Intravenous immunoglobulin was the most common treatment in both the groups, with no difference in efficacy.

CONCLUSIONS

Super-elderly onset GBS tends to be severe, therefore it is important to diagnose and treat appropriately, even in the absence of prior episodes of infection.

Incidence of Guillain-Barré syndrome following SARS-CoV-2 immunization: Analysis of a nationwide registry of recipients of 81 million doses of seven vaccines

Background and purpose

Information on Guillain–Barré syndrome (GBS) as an adverse event following immunization (AEFI) against SARS‐CoV‐2 remains scarce. We aimed to report GBS incidence as an AEFI among adult (≥18 years) recipients of 81,842,426 doses of seven anti‐SARS‐CoV‐2 vaccines between December 24, 2020, and October 29, 2021, in Mexico.

Methods

Cases were retrospectively collected through passive epidemiological surveillance. The overall observed incidence was calculated according to the total number of administered doses. Vaccines were analyzed individually and by vector as mRNA‐based (mRNA‐1273 and BNT162b2), adenovirus‐vectored (ChAdOx1 nCov‐19, rAd26‐rAd5, Ad5‐nCoV, and Ad26.COV2‐S), and inactivated whole‐virion‐vectored (CoronaVac) vaccines.

Results

We identified 97 patients (52 males [53.6%]; median [interquartile range] age 44 [33–60] years), for an overall observed incidence of 1.19/1,000,000 doses (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.97–1.45), with incidence higher among Ad26.COV2‐S (3.86/1,000,000 doses, 95% CI 1.50–9.93) and BNT162b2 recipients (1.92/1,00,000 doses, 95% CI 1.36–2.71). The interval (interquartile range) from vaccination to GBS symptom onset was 10 (3–17) days. Preceding diarrhea was reported in 21 patients (21.6%) and mild COVID‐19 in four more (4.1%). Only 18 patients were tested for Campylobacter jejuni (positive in 16 [88.9%]). Electrophysiological examinations were performed in 76 patients (78.4%; axonal in 46 [60.5%] and demyelinating in 25 [32.8%]); variants were similar across the platforms. On admission, 91.8% had a GBS disability score ≥3. Seventy‐five patients (77.3%) received intravenous immunoglobulin, received seven plasma exchange (7.2%), and 15 (15.5%) were treated conservatively. Ten patients (10.3%) died, and 79.1% of survivors were unable to walk independently.

Conclusions

Guillain–Barré syndrome was an extremely infrequent AEFI against SARS‐CoV‐2. The protection provided by these vaccines outweighs the risk of developing GBS.

Old age and multiple comorbidity are associated with delayed diagnosis of Guillain-Barre syndrome

To assess whether older age and presence of comorbidities were associated with a delayed diagnosis of Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS). The medical records of 140 patients diagnosed with GBS at Severance Hospital from March 2011 to December 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. Comorbidity profiles were assessed using the Charlson comorbidity index (CCI). The age-adjusted CCI (ACCI) score was calculated, which further incorporated the effect of age. Patients were classified into the early diagnosis group (diagnosis duration ≤ 14 days) and late diagnosis group (diagnosis duration > 14 days). Clinical features and comorbidity profiles were compared between the two groups. The cumulative incidence of diagnosis was compared between the low and high ACCI groups. Age was significantly higher in the late diagnosis group (61.8 ± 15.0 years) than in the early diagnosis group (49.1 ± 18.4, p = 0.001). The CCI score was higher in the late diagnosis group (≥ 3 in 26.1%) than in the early diagnosis group (≥ 3 in 5.1%, p = 0.01). The ACCI score demonstrated a positive correlation with the diagnosis duration (β = 1.636, p < 0.001), indicating that the diagnosis was delayed in patients with a higher ACCI score. The duration from onset to diagnosis was longer in the high ACCI group than in the low ACCI group (log-rank test, p < 0.001). The diagnosis duration was significantly longer, especially in patients with malignancy and cardiovascular diseases. Delayed diagnosis of GBS is associated with older age and multiple comorbidities. Diagnostic delay was significant in patients with malignancies and cardiovascular diseases. Early suspicion of GBS is required in these patients.