Anterior endoscopic sublabial transmaxillary access to middle cranial base lesions

BACKGROUND

Anterior endoscopic access to middle cranial base lesions becomes feasible in the presence of infratemporal fossa (ITF) involvement. Various approaches, including endoscopic endonasal, transoral sublabial, and transorbital methods, have been described for accessing the ITF through a transmaxillary corridor. Among these approaches, endonasal access is the most commonly preferred, while the transorbital approach is a novel technique gaining popularity. The transoral sublabial approach is considered suitable for selected lesions.

METHODS

Patients who underwent the anterior endoscopic transoral/sublabial transmaxillary approach to middle cranial base lesions at a single institute from 2016 to 2023 were included in this retrospective study. Malignant lesions were excluded from the study. The sublabial approach was exclusively performed in all cases, with the exception of one patient who required a combined approach.

RESULTS

The anterior endoscopic transoral sublabial transmaxillary approach to the infratemporal fossa, upper parapharyngeal space, and middle cranial fossa was performed on 14 patients. The underlying conditions for these patients were as follows: trigeminal schwannomas (n = 8), meningiomas (n = 2), juvenile nasopharyngeal angiofibroma, osteochondroma, arachnoid cyst and encephalocele (n = 1 each). Gross total resection was achieved in 11 cases. The most common complication was numbness in the territory of the maxillary and mandibular nerves (n = 4). Two patients needed endoscopic maxillary antrostomy for persistent suppuration. No wound problems or CSF rhinorrhea occurred. The average follow-up time was 26.6 months.

CONCLUSION

The endoscopic sublabial transmaxillary approach provides direct access to the infratemporal fossa and middle cranial base, enhancing the surgical range of maneuverability while sparing the sinonasal cavity. This procedure is safe, less invasive, and could be used as an efficient corridor for the resection of selected infratemporal fossa lesions with or without extension to the middle cranial base and parapharyngeal space.

Endoscopic Endonasal Approach to the Pterygopalatine Fossa and Infratemporal Fossa: Comparison of the Prelacrimal and Denker's Corridors

BACKGROUND

Both the endoscopic transnasal Denker's and prelacrimal approaches provide surgical access to the pterygopalatine fossa (PPF) and infratemporal fossa (ITF).

OBJECTIVES

This study compares the potential maximum exposure of the PPF and ITF and quantifies the difference in surgical freedom via endoscopic Denker's and prelacrimal approaches.

METHODS

Six cadaveric specimens (12 sides) were dissected using a prelacrimal approach on one side and an endoscopic Denker's approach on the contralateral side. The contents of the PPF and ITF were sequentially exposed. Surgical freedom for each corridor was subsequently calculated.

RESULTS

This study confirms that both the prelacrimal and Denker's approaches provide adequate exposure of the PPF and ITF. The maximum exposure boundaries were similar for both approaches, including the middle cranial fossa superiorly, floor of the maxillary sinus inferiorly, zygomatic arch and temporomandibular joint laterally, and post-styloid space posteriorly. However, the data revealed a statistically significant difference (p < 0.05) regarding the surgical freedom of the prelacrimal (388.17 ± 32.86 mm²) and the endoscopic Denker's approaches (906.35 ± 38.38 mm²).

CONCLUSION

When compared with an endoscopic Denker's approach, a prelacrimal approach seems to achieve a similar extent of exposure (ie, visualization) of the PPF and ITF. Nonetheless, the endoscopic Denker's approach offers superior surgical freedom; thus, it is preferred for the management of complex lesions which requires increased instrument maneuverability with a 3- or 4-handed technique.

[Research advances on endoscopic surgical approach for infratemporal fossa tumors]

The tumors occurring in infratemporal fossa （ITF） and parapharyngeal space account for 0.5%-1.0% of head and neck tumors, 80% of which are benign and 20% are malignant. At present, a variety of ITF surgical approaches have been described in domestic and foreign literatures. However, the selection of surgical approaches in clinical practice is still based on the habits and experience of the operators, there is still a lack of standardized clinical guidance. This article mainly introduces the advantages and disadvantages of the latest anatomical division of ITF and the corresponding endoscopic surgical approach as well as the research progress, so as to provide reference for the selection of the optimal surgical approach for ITF tumors.