Comparison of Sinonasal Histopathological Changes in Biological Treatment of Eosinophilic Chronic Rhinosinusitis

Histopathologic features of biologic therapy nonresponders in chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis

BACKGROUND

Biologics are effective for chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis (CRSwNP) by reducing type 2 inflammation. Nonresponders often require functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS) and represent a challenging population potentially due to non-type 2 pathophysiology. This study characterizes the histopathologic features of biologic nonresponders.

METHODS

A retrospective review of 257 CRSwNP patients undergoing FESS was conducted. The biologic nonresponder group included patients with prior biologic therapy who exhibited persistent symptoms and polyp burden. Those with CRSwNP not prescribed biologic therapy were selected as controls. Demographics, comorbidities, and structured histopathology consisting of 13 variables were collected.

RESULTS

Of 257 CRSwNP patients, 20 were on biologics prior to FESS. Fourteen patients (70.0%) received dupilumab, one (5.0%) received mepolizumab, one (5.0%) received omalizumab, and four (20.0%) tried multiple biologics. The mean age for the biologic nonresponder group was 45.8 years compared to 50.4 years for the controls. Nonresponders had a significantly increased incidence of reduced tissue eosinophilia, defined as <5 per high power field (55% vs. 31.2%, p = 0.044) and increased basement membrane thickening (100% vs. 78.1%, p = 0.019). The remaining 11 variables did not reach statistical significance.

CONCLUSION

Histopathologic analysis of biologic nonresponders demonstrates decreased eosinophilia and thickened basement membranes. These findings, particularly low tissue eosinophils, are consistent with a non-type 2 CRSwNP that may be recalcitrant to biologic therapies. Histopathologic analysis done in conjunction with FESS may aid clinicians in understanding response to biologic therapies in patients with CRSwNP who have persistent symptom burden necessitating FESS.

Tissue Eosinophilia is Superior to an Analysis by Polyp Status for the Chronic Rhinosinusitis Transcriptome: An RNA Study

OBJECTIVE

RNA sequencing (transcriptomics) is used to study biological pathways. However, the yield of data depends on comparing well-characterized cohorts. We compared tissue eosinophilia versus nasal polyp (NP) status as the metric to characterize transcriptomic mechanisms at play in eosinophilic and non-eosinophilic chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) versus controls.

METHODS

RNA sequencing was conducted on sinonasal tissue samples of CRS and controls. Analyses were conducted based on polyp status [with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) and without nasal polyps (CRSsNP)] as well as tissue eosinophil levels per high power field (eos/hpf)[non-eosinophilic (<10 eos/hpf, neCRS) or eosinophilic (≥10 eos/hpf, eCRS)]. The yield of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) and biological pathways through Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (IPA) were compared.

RESULTS

CRS tissue differed from controls by 736 statistically significant DEGs. Both NP status and tissue eosinophilia were effective in differentiating CRS from controls and into two distinct subgroups. Statistically significant DEGs identified when comparing CRS by NP status were 60, whereas 110 DEGs were identified using eosinophil cutoff ≥10 and <10 eos/hpf. Additionally, heatmaps showed greater homogeneity within each CRS subgroup when analyzed by tissue eosinophilia versus NP status. On IPA, the IL-17 signaling pathway was significantly different only by tissue eosinophilia status, not NP status, being higher in CRS <10 eos/hpf.

CONCLUSION

Tissue eosinophilia is superior to an analysis by NP status for the study of CRS transcriptome by RNA sequencing in identifying DEGs. Classification of CRS samples by eosinophil counts agnostic of NP status may offer advantageous insights into CRS pathogenetic mechanisms.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3 Laryngoscope, 133:2480-2489, 2023.