Patients Scheduled for Chondrocyte Implantation Treatment with MACI Have Larger Defects than Those Enrolled in Clinical Trials

Applying additional autologous platelet-rich fibrin matrix or serial platelet-rich plasma to microfracture technique increases the quality of the repaired cartilage

PURPOSE

The aim of the present study is to investigate and compare the effects of biological adjuvants (platelet-rich plasma, platelet-rich fibrin matrix) and microfracture technique individually and in combination on full thickness chondral defects in a rabbit model.

METHODS

A total of 60 New Zealand White rabbits were randomly divided into six groups according to treatment modality as follows: control (C), microfracture (MF), platelet-rich plasma (PRP), platelet-rich fibrin matrix (PRFM), platelet-rich fibrin matrix after microfracture (MF + PRFM) and platelet-rich plasma after microfracture (MF + PRP) groups. The cartilage repair tissue was assessed histologically via International Cartilage Repair Score (ICRS) and macroscopically via ICRS macroscopic assessment scale.

RESULTS

It was shown that overall macroscopic scores of the groups with MF were higher than those of the groups without MF. The cell morphology observed in the defect areas was mostly characterized with non-chondrocyte cells in the groups without MF, whereas chondrocyte cells mostly prevailed in the groups with MF. There was a greater integration through the cartilage-like tissue in the MF + PRP and MF + PRFM groups. The control group showed either fissures or fissures partially filled with fibrous tissue. When the groups were individually examined, there were statistically significant differences between the control and MF groups (p = 0.002), between the control and MF + PRFM groups (p = 0.001), between the control and MF + PRP groups (p < 0.001), between the PRFM and MF + PRFM groups (p = 0.014) and between the PRFM and MF + PRP (p = 0.023) groups in terms of histological evaluation scores.

CONCLUSION

The application of PRP and PRFM in combination with MF treatment exhibited a positive impact on the repair and restoration of cartilage, and produced better outcomes than the individual use of PRP and PRFM. Nevertheless, in the treatment of full thickness chondral defects, the use of PRFM injection is recommended, which is performed intraoperatively at a single time and with no difficulty of repeating after surgery, instead of serial PRP injections based on the macroscopic and histological results obtained in the present study indicating that there was no significant difference between the use of these two adjuvants.

Particulated Cartilage for Chondral and Osteochondral Repair: A Review

INTRODUCTION

Injuries to articular cartilage have a poor spontaneous repair potential and no gold standard treatment exist. Particulated cartilage, both auto- and allograft, is a promising new treatment method that circumvents the high cost of scaffold- and cell-based treatments.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A comprehensive database search on particulated cartilage was performed.

RESULTS

Fourteen animal studies have found particulated cartilage to be an effective treatment for cartilage injuries. Many studies suggest that juvenile cartilage has increased regenerative potential compared to adult cartilage. Sixteen clinical studies on 4 different treatment methods have been published. (1) CAIS, particulated autologous cartilage in a scaffold, (2) Denovo NT, juvenile human allograft cartilage embedded in fibrin glue, (3) autologous cartilage chips-with and without concomitant bone grafting, and (4) augmented autologous cartilage chips.

CONCLUSION

Implantation of allogeneic and autologous particulated cartilage provides a low cost and effective treatment alternative to microfracture and autologous chondrocyte implantation. The methods are promising, but large randomized controlled studies are needed.

Demographics in Patients Receiving Matrix-Assisted Chondrocyte Implantation (MACI) in the Ankle

Objective. To compare demographics and cartilage lesion characteristics of patients enrolled in clinical trials investigating autologous chondrocyte implantation (ACI) in the ankle joint with those actually scheduled for matrix-assisted chondrocyte implantation (MACI) using database records. Design. Anonymized data from patients scheduled for MACI treatment in the ankle in Australia/Asia and Europe were obtained from the Genzyme/Sanofi database. Average age, defect size, and male-female ratio were analyzed and compared by country. A literature search was performed on PubMed and Google Scholar and clinical cohort studies and prospective comparative trials using ACI and related treatments in the ankle joint were identified. Weighted average age, weighted defect size, and male-female ratio were analyzed and compared with database data. Results. The 167 patients included from the databases from Europe and Australia had a mean age of 33.4 years (range 14-64 years) and a mean defect size of 2.27 cm² (range 0.25-16 cm²). Male-female ratio was 4:3. Patients from European countries were significantly younger and had significantly larger defects compared with patients from Australia. From the literature search a total of 472 patients were included from 28 studies. The mean age was 32.2 years (range 15-62 years). Male-female ratio was 3:2. Weighted mean size was 1.94cm² (range 0.3-16). There were no significant differences between previous studies and databases. Conclusion. No differences in sizes and age were found between patients enrolled in clinical trials and patients scheduled for MACI outside clinical trials. The sizes of treated defects followed the general recommendations. There were, however, significant differences between countries.

Accurate Reporting of Concomitant Procedures Is Highly Variable in Studies Investigating Knee Cartilage Restoration

OBJECTIVE

Successful clinical outcomes following cartilage restoration procedures are highly dependent on addressing concomitant pathology. The purpose of this study was to document methods for evaluating concomitant procedures of the knee when performed with articular cartilage restoration techniques, and to review their reported findings in high-impact clinical orthopedic studies. We hypothesized that there are substantial inconsistencies in reporting clinical outcomes associated with concomitant procedures relative to outcomes related to isolated cartilage repair.

DESIGN

A total of 133 clinical studies on articular cartilage repair of the knee were identified from 6 high-impact orthopedic journals between 2011 and 2017. Studies were included if they were primary research articles reporting clinical outcomes data following surgical treatment of articular cartilage lesions with a minimum sample size of 5 patients. Studies were excluded if they were review articles, meta-analyses, and articles reporting only nonclinical outcomes (e.g., imaging, histology). A full-text review was then used to evaluate details regarding study methodology and reporting on the following variables: primary cartilage repair procedure, and the utilization of concomitant procedures to address additional patient comorbidities, including malalignment, meniscus pathology, and ligamentous instability. Each study was additionally reviewed to document variation in clinical outcomes reporting in patients that had these comorbidities addressed at the time of surgery.

RESULTS

All studies reported on the type of primary cartilage repair procedure, with autologous chondrocyte implantation (ACI) noted in 43% of studies, microfracture (MF) reported in 16.5%, osteochondral allograft (OCA) in 15%, and osteochondral autograft transplant (OAT) in 8.2%. Regarding concomitant pathology, anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (24.8%) and meniscus repair (23.3%) were the most commonly addressed patient comorbidities. A total of 56 studies (42.1%) excluded patients with malalignment, meniscus injury, and ligamentous instability. For studies that addressed concomitant pathology, 72.7% reported clinical outcomes separately from the cohort treated with only cartilage repair. A total of 16.5% of studies neither excluded nor addressed concomitant pathologies. There was a significant amount of variation in the patient reported outcome scores used among the studies, with the majority of studies reporting International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcomes Score (KOOS) in 47.2% and 43.6% of articles, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study on knee cartilage restoration, recognition and management of concomitant pathology is inadequately reported in approximately 28% of studies. Only 30% of articles reported adequate treatment of concomitant ailments while scoring their outcomes using one of a potential 18 different scoring systems. These findings highlight the need for more standardized methods to be applied in future research with regard to inclusion, exclusion, and scoring concomitant pathologies with regard to treatment of cartilage defects in the knee.

Use of MACI (Autologous Cultured Chondrocytes on Porcine Collagen Membrane) in the United States: Preliminary Experience

Background

In December 2016, MACI (autologous cultured chondrocytes on porcine collagen membrane) received approval from the US Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of symptomatic articular cartilage defects of the knee with or without bone involvement in adults.

Purpose

To describe the cartilage defects and patient characteristics for 1000 adult patients treated with MACI for knee cartilage repair in the United States.

Study Design

Case series; Level of evidence, 4.

Methods

Data collected by Vericel for adult patients treated for articular cartilage defects of the knee were reconciled and summarized. Data were collected for 1000 consecutive patients starting on July 1, 2017, when Carticel (the prior generation of autologous cultured chondrocytes) was no longer available. Patient names were removed for confidentiality, and patients were identified by MACI lot number and surgery date. Safety data were derived from the pharmacovigilance database. Patient demographics, cartilage defect characteristics, concomitant surgical procedures, and adverse events were summarized with descriptive statistics.

Results

A total of 1000 adults and 1010 knee joints were implanted with MACI by 372 surgeons. The male (49.6%)-to-female (50.4%) ratio was evenly split, and the mean age was 34.0 years. The majority of patients (68.1%) had a single cartilage defect treated, and the mean treated defect size was 4.7 cm². The mean total treated lesion size, including multiple defects, was 5.8 cm². The patella was the most commonly treated joint surface (32.7%), followed by the medial femoral condyle (31.3%). Most patients (92.4%) had concomitant surgical procedures at the time of cartilage biopsy acquisition. The most common concomitant procedures at the time of biopsy procurement included cartilage debridement (83.7%) and meniscal resection (11.3%). The most common planned concomitant surgeries at the time of MACI implantation were anterior tibial tubercleplasty (7.8%) and reconstruction of dislocating patella (5.5%). Few patients (2.6%) had adverse events.

Conclusion

Patient age and mean total MACI-treated defect size in the United States are similar to the findings of the pivotal European SUMMIT (Superiority of MACI Implant Versus Microfracture Treatment) trial and other studies from outside the United States. Treatment of multiple cartilage defects is more frequent in the United States than elsewhere.

Beyond Cartilage Repair: The Role of the Osteochondral Unit in Joint Health and Disease

Once believed to be limited to articular cartilage, osteoarthritis is now considered to be an organ disease of the “whole joint.” Damage to the articular surface can lead to, be caused by, or occur in parallel with, damage to other tissues in the joint. The relationship between cartilage and the underlying subchondral bone has particular importance when assessing joint health and determining treatment strategies. The articular cartilage is anchored to the subchondral bone through an interface of calcified cartilage, which as a whole makes up the osteochondral unit. This unit functions primarily by transferring load-bearing weight over the joint to allow for normal joint articulation and movement. Unfortunately, irreversible damage and degeneration of the osteochondral unit can severely limit joint function. Our understanding of joint pain, the primary complaint of patients, is poorly understood and past efforts toward structural cartilage restoration have often not been associated with a reduction in pain. Continued research focusing on the contribution of subchondral bone and restoration of the entire osteochondral unit are therefore needed, with the hope that this will lead to curative, and not merely palliative, treatment options. The purpose of this narrative review is to investigate the role of the osteochondral unit in joint health and disease. Topics of discussion include the crosstalk between cartilage and bone, the efficacy of diagnostic procedures, the origins of joint pain, current and emerging treatment paradigms, and suitable preclinical animal models for safety and efficacy assessment of novel osteochondral therapies. The goal of the review is to facilitate an appreciation of the important role played by the subchondral bone in joint pain and why the osteochondral unit as a whole should be considered in many cases of joint restoration strategies.

Clinical outcome and subchondral bone edema presence at two-year follow-up after high density autologous chondrocyte implantation treatment in the knee

BACKGROUND

Recently, a new approach of autologous chondrocyte implantation technique (using as biomaterial a collagen type i/iii membrane) based on increasing cell density called HD-ACI (High Density Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation) has been described. The objective of this paper was to study the clinical outcome and incidence of subchondral bone oedema in patients with cartilage lesions in the knee treated with HD-ACI at 1-2 years of follow-up.

METHODS

This is a retrospective study performed with forty patients with chondral injuries grade iii-iv. All patients were treated with HD-ACI with a cellular dose of 5×10⁶ chondrocytes /cm² of lesion. The subjective perception of improvement of symptoms and functionality was measured with the IKDC score (International Knee Documentation Committee). The presence of bone oedema was assessed at 6, 12 and 24 months of follow-up by magnetic resonance imaging.

RESULTS

IKDC values showed a significant improvement at 12 and 24 months (P<.001). The mean difference of IKDC between the baseline visit and 12 months was 26.3 points, and 31.6 points at 24 months. Twenty-seven point five percent of the patients presented subchondral bone oedema at 2 years of follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

HD-ACI is an effective and safe treatment that improves pain, clinical perception and functionality of the joint. No correlation was found between the presence of bone oedema and the patients' clinical outcome.

Chasing Chimeras - The elusive stable chondrogenic phenotype

The choice of the best-suited cell population for the regeneration of damaged or diseased cartilage depends on the effectiveness of culture conditions (e.g. media supplements, three-dimensional scaffolds, mechanical stimulation, oxygen tension, co-culture systems) to induce stable chondrogenic phenotype. Herein, advances and shortfalls in in vitro, preclinical and clinical setting of various in vitro microenvironment modulators on maintaining chondrocyte phenotype or directing stem cells towards chondrogenic lineage are critically discussed. Chondrocytes possess low isolation efficiency, limited proliferative potential and rapid phenotypic drift in culture. Mesenchymal stem cells are relatively readily available, possess high proliferation potential, exhibit great chondrogenic differentiation capacity, but they tend to acquire a hypertrophic phenotype when exposed to chondrogenic stimuli. Embryonic and induced pluripotent stem cells, despite their promising in vitro and preclinical data, are still under-investigated. Although a stable chondrogenic phenotype remains elusive, recent advances in in vitro microenvironment modulators are likely to develop clinically- and commercially-relevant therapies in the years to come.

Fabrication and In Vitro Study of Tissue-Engineered Cartilage Scaffold Derived from Wharton's Jelly Extracellular Matrix

The scaffold is a key element in cartilage tissue engineering. The components of Wharton's jelly are similar to those of articular cartilage and it also contains some chondrogenic growth factors, such as insulin-like growth factor I and transforming growth factor-β. We fabricated a tissue-engineered cartilage scaffold derived from Wharton's jelly extracellular matrix (WJECM) and compared it with a scaffold derived from articular cartilage ECM (ACECM) using freeze-drying. The results demonstrated that both WJECM and ACECM scaffolds possessed favorable pore sizes and porosities; moreover, they showed good water uptake ratios and compressive moduli. Histological staining confirmed that the WJECM and ACECM scaffolds contained similar ECM. Moreover, both scaffolds showed good cellular adherence, bioactivity, and biocompatibility. MTT and DNA content assessments confirmed that the ACECM scaffold tended to be more beneficial for improving cell proliferation than the WJECM scaffold. However, RT-qPCR results demonstrated that the WJECM scaffold was more favorable to enhance cellular chondrogenesis than the ACECM scaffold, showing more collagen II and aggrecan mRNA expression. These results were confirmed indirectly by glycosaminoglycan and collagen content assessments and partially confirmed by histology and immunofluorescent staining. In conclusion, these results suggest that a WJECM scaffold may be favorable for future cartilage tissue engineering.

Advances and Prospects in Stem Cells for Cartilage Regeneration

The histological features of cartilage call attention to the fact that cartilage has a little capacity to repair itself owing to the lack of a blood supply, nerves, or lymphangion. Stem cells have emerged as a promising option in the field of cartilage tissue engineering and regenerative medicine and could lead to cartilage repair. Much research has examined cartilage regeneration utilizing stem cells. However, both the potential and the limitations of this procedure remain controversial. This review presents a summary of emerging trends with regard to using stem cells in cartilage tissue engineering and regenerative medicine. In particular, it focuses on the characterization of cartilage stem cells, the chondrogenic differentiation of stem cells, and the various strategies and approaches involving stem cells that have been used in cartilage repair and clinical studies. Based on the research into chondrocyte and stem cell technologies, this review discusses the damage and repair of cartilage and the clinical application of stem cells, with a view to increasing our systematic understanding of the application of stem cells in cartilage regeneration; additionally, several advanced strategies for cartilage repair are discussed.

Aarhus Regenerative Orthopaedics Symposium (AROS)

The combination of modern interventional and preventive medicine has led to an epidemic of ageing. While this phenomenon is a positive consequence of an improved lifestyle and achievements in a society, the longer life expectancy is often accompanied by decline in quality of life due to musculoskeletal pain and disability. The Aarhus Regenerative Orthopaedics Symposium (AROS) 2015 was motivated by the need to address regenerative challenges in an ageing population by engaging clinicians, basic scientists, and engineers. In this position paper, we review our contemporary understanding of societal, patient-related, and basic science-related challenges in order to provide a reasoned roadmap for the future to deal with this compelling and urgent healthcare problem.