The role of romiplostim for pediatric patients with immune thrombocytopenia

Impact of Thrombopoietin Receptor Agonists on Pathophysiology of Pediatric Immune Thrombocytopenia

Immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) in pediatric patients is a common cause of isolated thrombocytopenia. Various pathophysiological mechanisms are implicated in ITP pathogenesis, including the production of autoantibodies against components of platelets (PLTs) by B-cells, the activation of the complement system, phagocytosis by macrophages mediated by Fcγ receptors, the dysregulation of T cells, and reduced bone marrow megakaryopoiesis. ITP is commonly manifested with skin and mucosal bleeding, and it is a diagnosis of exclusion. In some ITP cases, the disease is self-limiting, and treatment is not required, but chronic-persistent disease can also be developed. In these cases, anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies, such as rituximab and thrombopoietin (TPO) receptor agonists, can be used. TPO agonists have become standard of care today. It has been reported in the published literature that the efficacy of TPO-RAs can be up to 80% in the achievement of several end goals, such as PLT counts. In the current literature review, the data regarding the impact of TPO agonists in the pathogenesis of ITP and treatment outcomes of the patients are examined. In the era of precision medicine, targeted and individualized therapies are crucial to achieving better outcomes for pediatric patients with ITP, especially when chronic refractory disease is developed.

Avatrombopag for adults with early versus chronic immune thrombocytopenia

Avatrombopag is a newer thrombopoietin receptor agonist (TPO-RA) currently approved to treat chronic ITP (duration >12 months). No studies have yet evaluated the safety and effectiveness of avatrombopag in newly diagnosed ITP (duration <3 months) or persistent ITP (duration 3-12 months), and so its use in these populations is presently off-label worldwide. We hypothesize that avatrombopag has similar safety and effectiveness irrespective of ITP disease phase. To evaluate this, we performed a multicenter observational cohort study of adults with ITP treated with avatrombopag, comparing patient outcomes by disease phase (newly diagnosed/persistent versus chronic). Seventy-five patients were included, 23 with newly diagnosed/persistent ITP (17.7 patient-years of avatrombopag treatment) and 52 with chronic ITP (65.3 patient-years of avatrombopag treatment). On avatrombopag, 91% of newly diagnosed/persistent patients versus 96% of chronic patients (p = .58) achieved a platelet response (≥50 × 109 /L) and 86% versus 81% of patients (p = .78) achieved a complete response (≥100 × 109 /L). Median platelet counts on avatrombopag were similar between the two groups (165 × 109 /L vs. 129 × 109 /L, p = .57). Response durability was high and similar in both groups. No patients in the newly diagnosed/persistent group had a major bleeding event, thromboembolic event or avatrombopag discontinuation for adverse events, compared with 4, 1, and 2, respectively, in the chronic group. Thrombocytosis (platelets ≥400 × 109 /L) incidence was similar in the two groups. No other drug-related adverse events occurred in either group. Avatrombopag was safe and effective in patients with newly diagnosed and persistent ITP, with outcomes numerically, statistically, and clinically similar to patients receiving avatrombopag for chronic ITP.

Optimal management of chemotherapy-induced thrombocytopenia with thrombopoietin receptor agonists

Chemotherapy-induced thrombocytopenia (CIT) is a common complication of antineoplastic therapy, resulting in antineoplastic therapy dose reductions, treatment delays, treatment discontinuation, and morbid bleeding events. Despite several decades of research into thrombopoietic growth factors in CIT, there are presently no available U.S. FDA- or EMA-approved agents to treat CIT. However, a respectable body of evidence has been published evaluating the thrombopoietin receptor agonists (TPO-RAs) for the management and prevention of CIT in patients with solid tumors, and critical studies are ongoing with the TPO-RAs romiplostim and avatrombopag. When employed in the appropriate patient population and used properly, TPO-RAs can successfully and safely manage CIT for extended periods of time with minimal apparent risks. This comprehensive review discusses the evidence for TPO-RAs in CIT in patients with solid tumors, provides detailed guidance for their use in the clinic, and discusses ongoing essential clinical trials in management of CIT.

Thrombopoietin-receptor agonists for adult patients with immune thrombocytopenia: a narrative review and an approach for managing patients fasting intermittently

Introduction

Thrombopoietin-receptor agonist (TPO-RAs) currently represent the state of art for treating immune thrombocytopenia. Their different molecular structures contribute to the difference in their pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics. This narrative review aims to provide an overview of the current TPO-RAs approved for primary immune thrombocytopenia (romiplostim, eltrombopag, avatrombopag) and the effect of intermittent fasting in adult patients receiving TPO-RAs.

Areas covered

Literature was searched with no limits on date or language, using various combinations of keywords. Data on the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, efficacy, and safety of TPO-RAs and the effect of intermittent fasting were summarized.

Expert opinion

Switching between TPO-RAs is a useful strategy to tackle some associated limitations. Romiplostim and avatrombopag have an advantage over eltrombopag as they do not require any dietary restrictions. In cases where romiplostim and avatrombopag are unavailable, patients should be educated on the appropriate administration, possible interactions, and dietary restrictions before initiating eltrombopag.

A proposal for new definition (s) and management approach to paediatric refractory ITP: Reflections from the Intercontinental ITP Study Group

Immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) in children is a relatively mild and self-limited disorder with the majority of children demonstrating normalization of platelet count by 12 months from diagnosis. Because of this, many children with ITP can be observed without the need for treatment. When needed, treatment with either intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) or corticosteroids is highly effective (>80% IVIG and >95% corticosteroids). For those children who require second-line therapies, response rates of >60% are seen with both the thrombopoietin-receptor agonists and rituximab. Despite this, some children will have 'refractory' ITP (rITP) with poor or transient responses to platelet-raising therapies. Here, we review the clinical features of rITP in children, outline proposed classifications and explore potential predictors for children with rITP.

Emerging data on thrombopoietin receptor agonists for management of chemotherapy-induced thrombocytopenia

INTRODUCTION

Chemotherapy-induced thrombocytopenia (CIT) is a common complication of cancer treatment, frequently leading to reduced relative dose intensity, and is associated with reduced survival. Given the lack of FDA-approved therapies for CIT, thrombopoietin receptor agonists (TPO-RAs) have received significant attention for treatment and prevention of CIT.

AREAS COVERED

This review will summarize the development of prior agents for treatment of CIT, discuss the existing literature investigating the use of TPO-RAs in CIT primarily in patients with solid tumor malignancies, and offer insights on the future direction of TPO-RAs and other therapeutics for CIT.

EXPERT OPINION

In alignment with NCCN guidelines, we recommend that patients with CIT participate in a clinical trial for consideration of TPO-RA treatment or consider off-label use of romiplostim when participation in clinical trials is not possible. The literature to date supports the use of TPO-RAs for treatment of persistent CIT. Further data is needed to describe the long-term efficacy, safety, and prescribing practices of TPO-RAs in a diverse patient population with a variety of tumor types and chemotherapy regimens in addition to exploring the underlying biology of CIT.

Chemotherapy-induced thrombocytopenia: literature review

Chemotherapy-induced thrombocytopenia (CIT) is a common condition that frequently results in reduced chemotherapy dosages, postponed treatment, bleeding, and unfavorable oncological outcomes. At present, there is no clear suggestions for preventing or treating CIT. Thrombopoietin (TPO) replacement therapy has been invented and used to treat CIT to promote the production of megakaryocytes and stimulate the formation of platelets. However, this treatment is limited to the risk of immunogenicity and cancer progression. Therefore, an unmet need exists for exploring alternatives to TPO to address the clinical issue of CIT. Application of appropriate therapeutic drugs may be due to understanding the potential mechanisms of CIT. Studies have shown that chemotherapy significantly affects various cells in bone marrow (BM) microenvironment, reduces their ability to support normal hematopoiesis, and may lead to BM damage, including CIT in cancer patients. This review focuses on the epidemiology and treatment of cancer patients with CIT. We also introduce some recent progress to understand the cellular and molecular mechanisms of chemotherapy inhibiting normal hematopoiesis and causing thrombocytopenia.

Thrombopoietin receptor agonists for chemotherapy-induced thrombocytopenia: a new solution for an old problem

Chemotherapy-induced thrombocytopenia (CIT) is common, resulting in increased bleeding risk and chemotherapy delays, dose reduction, and treatment discontinuation, which can negatively affect oncologic outcomes. The only agent approved by the US Food and Drug Administration to manage CIT (oprelvekin) was voluntarily withdrawn from the market by the manufacturer, leaving few options for patients. Therefore, patients experiencing CIT present a significant clinical challenge in daily practice. The availability of thrombopoietin receptor agonists has led to formal clinical trials describing efficacy in CIT as well as a rather extensive body of published observational data from off-label use in this setting but no formal regulatory indications for CIT to date. The accumulated data, however, have affected National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines, which now recommend consideration of TPO-RA clinical trials as well as off-label use of romiplostim. This review article details the evidence to date for the management of CIT with thrombopoietin receptor agonists (TPO-RAs), discussing the efficacy data, the specific circumstances when treatment is warranted (and when it is generally unnecessary), and safety considerations. Specific recommendations regarding patient selection, initiation, dosing, titration, and discontinuation for TPO-RA therapy in CIT are given, based on published data and expert opinion where evidence is lacking.

An updated evaluation of avatrombopag for the treatment of chronic immune thrombocytopenia

INTRODUCTION

Multiple agents are available for the management of chronic immune thrombocytopenia (ITP), including thrombopoietin-receptor agonists (TPO-RAs), rituximab, and fostamatinib. Although TPO-RAs are often selected as treatments for chronic ITP, when choosing between the TPO-RAs, clinicians must balance safety profile, dosing restrictions, and method of administration incorporating patient preference.

AREAS COVERED

We provide an overview of the thrombopoietin receptor agonists with a particular focus on avatrombopag, the newest agent in this class. In phase II and III clinical trials, avatrombopag was shown to offer durable improvement in platelet counts. We also include recent real-world evidence describing avatrombopag effectiveness in patients with poor response to prior treatments (including other TPO-RAs).

EXPERT OPINION

Compared with other TPO-RAs used to treat ITP, avatrombopag offers practical oral dosing with a single pill strength, does not require long-term dietary restrictions, and has no warning for hepatotoxicity. It is frequently effective after use of other TPO-RAs in ITP. The primary downside with avatrombopag use at present is the lack of longer-term safety data in ITP that presently exists for romiplostim and eltrombopag.

Romiplostim for chemotherapy‐induced thrombocytopenia: Efficacy and safety of extended use

Background

Chemotherapy‐induced thrombocytopenia (CIT) is common during treatment with antineoplastic therapies and may adversely impact chemotherapy dose intensity. There is no approved therapy for CIT. In our recent phase II randomized study, romiplostim led to correction of platelet counts in 85% of treated patients and allowed resumption of chemotherapy, with low rates of recurrent CIT in the first two cycles or 8 weeks of chemotherapy. However, there is a lack of long‐term data on the efficacy and safety of romiplostim in CIT.

Objectives

To analyze efficacy and safety of romiplostim in the patients in the phase 2 study, who received romiplostim for ≥1 year.

Patients/Methods

Twenty‐one patients remained on romiplostim for ≥1 year. We analyzed the effect of romiplostim on platelet counts, absolute neutrophil counts, and hemoglobin, as well as impact on ongoing chemotherapy. We also tracked venous or arterial thrombotic events.

Results

During the study period, romiplostim was effective in preventing reduction of chemotherapy dose intensity due to CIT. Fourteen of the 20 (70%) analyzable patients experienced no episode of CIT, 4 subjects experienced a single chemotherapy dose delay due CIT, and 2 patients required a chemotherapy dose reduction. Platelet counts were preserved throughout the duration of the extension analysis. One patient experienced a proximal deep vein thrombosis, and one patient experienced multiple tumor‐related ischemic events.

Conclusions

Long‐term use of romiplostim for treatment of CIT was effective and safe, with no evidence of resistance or increased risk of thrombosis.

Recent advances in treatments of adult immune thrombocytopenia

Immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) is isolated thrombocytopenia characterized by autoimmune-mediated disruption of platelet without other etiologies. Treatments for chronic ITP consist of corticosteroids, intravenous immunoglobulins, anti-D immunoglobulin, rituximab, thrombopoietin receptor agonists, immunosuppressants and splenectomy. Although current therapies are effective in over two-thirds of patients, some patients are refractory to therapies or fail to achieve long-term responses. Recently, great advance has been made in identifying various mechanisms involved in ITP pathogenesis, and new treatments targeting these pathways are being developed. Novel agents such as splenic tyrosine kinase inhibitor, Bruton kinase inhibitor, plasma cell targeting therapies, neonatal Fc receptor inhibitor, platelet desialylation inhibitor, and inhibition of the classical complement pathway are expected to be effective for ITP treatment. This review summarizes current strategies and emerging therapies of ITP.

Assessment of romiplostim immunogenicity in pediatric patients in clinical trials and in a global postmarketing registry

Development of first-generation thrombopoietins (TPOs) was halted due to antibodies that neutralized endogenous TPO, causing protracted thrombocytopenia in some patients. The second-generation TPO receptor agonist romiplostim, having no homology to TPO, was developed to circumvent potential immunogenicity. We examined the development of binding and neutralizing antibodies to romiplostim and TPO among pediatric patients with primary immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) in 5 clinical trials and a global postmarketing registry. In the trials, 25 of 280 (8.9%) patients developed anti-romiplostim binding antibodies. The first positive result was detected 67 weeks (median) after romiplostim treatment was initiated. The median romiplostim dose was 8 µg/kg, and the median platelet count was 87 × 109/L. Most patients who developed anti-romiplostim binding antibodies (18 of 25 [72%]) had ≥90% of platelet assessments showing a response. Anti-romiplostim neutralizing antibodies developed in 8 of 280 (2.9%) patients. The development of anti-romiplostim neutralizing antibodies was unrelated to the romiplostim dose, and most patients who developed the antibodies (7 of 8 [88%]) had platelet response. Nine of 279 (3.2%) patients developed anti-TPO binding antibodies, and 1 (0.4%) developed transient anti-TPO neutralizing antibodies. In 8 patients who developed anti-romiplostim neutralizing antibodies, no TPO cross-reactivity was observed. In the postmarketing registry, 3 of 19 (15.8%) patients developed anti-romiplostim binding antibodies; 1 (5.3%) patient developed anti-romiplostim neutralizing antibodies. These results suggest that immunogenicity to romiplostim occurs infrequently in pediatric patients with ITP and is generally not associated with loss of platelet response or other negative clinical sequelae.

An Update on Pediatric Immune Thrombocytopenia (ITP): Differentiating Primary ITP, IPD, and PID

Immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) is the most common acquired thrombocytopenia in children and is caused by both immune-mediated decreased platelet production and increased platelet destruction. In the absence of a diagnostic test, ITP must be differentiated from other thrombocytopenic disorders, including inherited platelet disorders (IPD). In addition, a diagnosis of secondary ITP due to a primary immune deficiency (PID) with immune dysregulation may not be apparent at diagnosis but can alter management and should be considered in an expanding number of clinical scenarios. The diagnostic evaluation of children with thrombocytopenia will vary based on the clinical history and laboratory features. Access to genotyping has broadened the ability to specify the etiology of thrombocytopenia, while increasing access to immunophenotyping, functional immunologic and platelet assays, and biochemical markers has allowed for more in-depth evaluation of patients. With this greater availability of testing, diagnostic algorithms in patients with thrombocytopenia have become complex. In this article, we highlight the diagnostic evaluation of thrombocytopenia in children with a focus on ITP, including consideration of underlying genetic and immune disorders, and utilize hypothetical patient cases to describe disease manifestations and strategies for treatment of pediatric ITP.

Management of Adult Patients with Immune Thrombocytopenia (ITP): A Review on Current Guidance and Experience from Clinical Practice

Immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) is an autoimmune process resulting in increased destruction and inadequate production of platelets that can result in bleeding, fatigue, and reduced health-related quality of life. While treatment is not required for many patients with ITP, the occurrence of bleeding manifestations, severe thrombocytopenia, and requirement for invasive procedures are among the reasons necessitating initiation of therapy. Corticosteroids, intravenous immunoglobulin, and anti-RhD immune globulin are typical first-line and rescue treatments, but these agents typically do not result in a durable remission in adult patients. Most patients requiring treatment therefore require subsequent line therapies, such as thrombopoietin receptor agonists (TPO-RAs), rituximab, fostamatinib, splenectomy, or a number of other immunosuppressive agents. In this focused review, we discuss management of adult ITP in the acute and chronic settings.

Clinical challenges and promising therapies for chemotherapy-induced thrombocytopenia

Introduction: Chemotherapy-induced thrombocytop enia (CIT) is a common complication of cancer treatment causing chemotherapy delays, dose reductions, and treatment discontinuation, negatively impacting treatment outcomes and putting patients at risk for bleeding complications. There is no FDA-approved agent available to manage CIT.Areas covered: This article covers the diagnosis, definitions, and clinical challenges of CIT, and then focuses on the therapeutics developed to manage CIT. The first-generation thrombopoietic agents (oprelvekin and recombinant human thrombopoietins) are reviewed for critical background and context, followed by a detailed discussion of the data for the thrombopoietin receptor agonists (TPO-RAs) to manage CIT. Efficacy of TPO-RAs in treatment and prevention of CIT, as well as safety concerns such as the risk of thromboembolic complications, are reviewed in detail. For this review, a PubMed/MEDLINE literature search was undertaken for relevant articles published from 1995-2021.Expert opinion: After over two decades of drug development for CIT, multiple clinical trials and observational studies have found TPO-RAs, in particular romiplostim, to be safe and effective agents to manage patients with CIT, although no agent is yet FDA-approved for this indication. Active management of CIT with TPO-RAs is likely to improve oncologic outcomes, although additional data are needed. Phase 3 trials are ongoing.

Phase I Dose-Finding, Safety, and Tolerability Trial of Romiplostim to Improve Platelet Recovery After UCB Transplantation

Platelet recovery is delayed after umbilical cord blood transplant (UCBT). Romiplostim is a thrombopoietin receptor agonist that has the potential to improve platelet engraftment after UCBT. The purpose of this study was to determine the safety profile and maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of romiplostim and to investigate whether romiplostim accelerates platelet recovery post-UCBT. It was a single-center, dose-finding, safety and tolerability phase I trial of weekly romiplostim in 20 adult patients who failed to achieve an un-transfused platelet count of 20 × 10⁹/L by day +28 post-UCBT. Romiplostim was administered at the assigned dose as 6 weekly injections beginning by day +42 post-UCBT. Four dose levels (4, 6, 8, and 10 µg/kg per dose) were evaluated. The MTD of romiplostim was determined by the continual reassessment method, with a goal to identify a dose level with desired toxicity rate of ≤20%. Median age of the patients was 59.5 years, and 60% were female. Eleven patients received nonmyeloablative (NMA) double UCBT, seven patients received myeloablative single UCBT, and two patients received NMA single UCBT. Two patients received 4 µg/kg per dose, two received 6 µg/kg per dose, four received 8 µg/kg per dose, and the remaining 12 received 10 µg/kg per dose. Only five patients completed the full six doses of treatment. Of the 15 patients who received fewer than six doses, 12 were due to a platelet count of >100 × 10⁹/L, two were due to platelet count of >400 × 10⁹/L, and one was due to right upper extremity edema without thrombosis. All romiplostim-treated patients achieved platelet engraftment to 20 × 10⁹/L at a median of 45 days post-UCBT compared to 90% of controls at a median of 45 days (P = .08). Similarly, 90% of romiplostim-treated patients achieved platelet engraftment to 50 × 10⁹/L at a median of 48 days compared to 75% of controls at a median of 52 days (P = .09). All dose levels were effective with low toxicity; therefore, the MTD of romiplostim was 10 µg/kg per dose, and romiplostim is a safe and potentially effective therapy to counter delayed platelet recovery post-UCBT.

Developments in the production of platelets from stem cells (Review)

Platelets are small pieces of cytoplasm that have become detached from the cytoplasm of mature megakaryocytes (MKs) in the bone marrow. Platelets modulate vascular system integrity and serve important role, particularly in hemostasis. With the rapid development of clinical medicine, the demand for platelet transfusion as a life‑saving intervention increases continuously. Stem cell technology appears to be highly promising for transfusion medicine, and the generation of platelets from stem cells would be of great value in the clinical setting. Furthermore, several studies have been undertaken to investigate the potential of producing platelets from stem cells. Initial success has been achieved in terms of the yields and function of platelets generated from stem cells. However, the requirements of clinical practice remain unmet. The aim of the present review was to focus on several sources of stem cells and factors that induce MK differentiation. Updated information on current research into the genetic regulation of megakaryocytopoiesis and platelet generation was summarized. Additionally, advanced strategies of platelet generation were reviewed and the progress made in this field was discussed.

An evaluation of avatrombopag for the treatment of thrombocytopenia

Introduction: The thrombopoietin receptor agonists (TPO-RAs) are a class of drugs that have been FDA-approved for immune thrombocytopenia (ITP), periprocedural thrombocytopenia in patients with chronic liver disease (CLD), aplastic anemia, and thrombocytopenia associated with antiviral treatment of hepatitis C. Avatrombopag is a TPO-RA that is currently FDA-approved for ITP and periprocedural thrombocytopenia in patients with CLD and is currently undergoing evaluation for chemotherapy-induced thrombocytopenia (CIT) in an international phase III clinical trial. Areas covered: This paper summarizes the chemistry, pharmacodynamics, and pharmacokinetics of avatrombopag. In addition, the authors review the efficacy and safety of avatrombopag, covering clinical trials in patients with ITP and in patients with CLD scheduled to undergo a procedure. Expert opinion: Avatrombopag has demonstrated efficacy in patients with ITP. With its low side-effect burden, absence of hepatotoxicity, ease of use as an oral medication, and lack of food-drug interactions, avatrombopag is a favorable option for ITP, though there is a lack of long-term safety data. In periprocedural thrombocytopenia in patients with CLD, avatrombopag is comparable to lusutrombopag, another TPO-RA. Finally, the results of the study of avatrombopag in CIT are eagerly awaited, as there are no currently approved medications for this indication in the USA.