Effectiveness and safety of interferon α2a as an add-on treatment for refractory Behçet's uveitis

Decoding Behcet's Uveitis: an In-depth review of pathogenesis and therapeutic advances

Behcet's disease (BD) is a rare but globally distributed vasculitis that primarily affects populations in the Mediterranean and Asian regions. Behcet's uveitis (BU) is a common manifestation of BD, occurring in over two-thirds of the patients. BU is characterized by bilateral, chronic, recurrent, non-granulomatous uveitis in association with complications such as retinal ischemia and atrophy, optic atrophy, macular ischemia, macular edema, and further neovascular complications (vitreous hemorrhage, neovascular glaucoma). Although the etiology and pathogenesis of BU remain unclear, numerous studies reveal that genetic factors (such as HLA-B51), dysregulated immune responses of both the innate and adaptive immune systems, infections (such as streptococcus), and environmental factors (such as GDP) are all involved in its development. Innate immunity, including hyperactivity of neutrophils and γδT cells and elevated NK1/NK2 ratios, has been shown to play an essential role in this disease. Adaptive immune system disturbance, including homeostatic perturbations, Th1, Th17 overaction, and Treg cell dysfunction, is thought to be involved in BU pathogenesis. Treatment of BU requires a tailored approach based on the location, severity of inflammation, and systemic manifestations. The therapy aims to achieve rapid inflammation suppression, preservation of vision, and prevention of recurrence. Systemic corticosteroids combined with other immunosuppressive agents have been widely used to treat BU, and beneficial effects are observed in most patients. Recently, biologics have been shown to be effective in treating refractory BU cases. Novel therapeutic targets for treating BU include the LCK gene, Th17/Treg balance, JAK pathway inhibition, and cytokines such as IL-17 and RORγt. This article summarizes the recent studies on BU, especially in terms of pathogenesis, diagnostic criteria and classification, auxiliary examination, and treatment options. A better understanding of the significance of microbiome composition, genetic basis, and persistent immune mechanisms, as well as advancements in identifying new biomarkers and implementing objective quantitative detection of BU, may greatly contribute to improving the adequate management of BU patients.

Shaping the Future of Behçet's Uveitis Management: A Comprehensive Review of Efficacy, Challenges, and Prospects of Biologic Therapies

Behçet's uveitis (BU), a vision-threatening manifestation of Behçet's disease, poses substantial management challenges due to its chronic, relapsing nature and potential for vision loss. This review explores the role of biologic therapies in the treatment of BU, providing a comprehensive overview of their effectiveness, drawbacks, and future possibilities. Traditionally, management has relied heavily on corticosteroids and conventional immunosuppressants. However, their long-term use is frequently associated with systemic side effects and insufficient control of ocular inflammation. Biologic therapies, particularly TNF-alpha inhibitors like infliximab and adalimumab, have emerged as effective alternatives, offering better disease control and a more favorable safety profile. We critically evaluated these agents, noting their clinical efficacy in reducing inflammatory flares and preserving visual acuity. Despite their benefits, several issues remain. Accessibility, cost, and lack of long-term safety data limit their widespread use. Additionally, individual variability in treatment response necessitates personalized therapeutic strategies. Recent research has shown promise in addressing these challenges, with the emergence of novel biologic agents and personalized medicine approaches. In summary, biologic therapies represent a paradigm shift in BU management, contributing to better patient outcomes. Yet, there are significant challenges to be overcome. As we move forward, continued research, development of novel biologic agents, and a precision medicine approach will shape the future landscape of BU treatment.

Earlier and more aggressive treatment with biologics may prevent relapses and further new organ involvement in Behçet's disease

OBJECTIVE

Immunosuppressives (IS) are the choice of treatment for major organ involvement in Behçet's disease (BD). In this study, we aimed to investigate the relapse rate and new major organ development in BD under ISs during long-term follow-up.

METHODS

The files of 1114 BD patients followed in Marmara University Behçet's Clinic were analyzed retrospectively. Patients with a follow-up less than 6 months were excluded. Conventional IS and biologic treatment courses were compared. 'Events under IS' were defined as a relapse of the same organ and/or new major organ development in patients receiving ISs.

RESULTS

Among 806 patients included in the final analysis (male: 56%, age at diagnosis: 29 (23-35) years, median follow-up time: 68 (33-106) months). Major organ involvement was present in 232 (50.5%) patients at diagnosis, and 227 (49.5%) developed new major organ involvement during follow-up. Major organ involvement developed earlier in males (p = 0.012) and in patients with a first-degree relative history of BD (p = 0.066). ISs were given mostly for major organ involvement (86.8%, n = 440). Overall, 36% of the patients had a relapse or new major organ involvement under ISs (relapse: 30.9%, new major organ involvement: 11.6%.) 'Events under IS' (35.5% vs 20.8%, p = 0.004), and relapses (29.3% vs 13.9%, p = 0.001) were more common with conventional ISs compared to biologics.

CONCLUSION

Any major event under ISs was less common with biologics compared to conventional ISs in patients with BD. These results suggest that earlier and more aggressive treatment may be an option in BD patients who had the highest risk for severe disease course.

Indications and effects of biological agents in the treatment of noninfectious uveitis

Noninfectious uveitis is a common blinding eye disease, and an autoimmune response is involved in its pathogenesis. Biological agents have gradually been introduced into the treatment of noninfectious uveitis. The authors reviewed the clinical application and side effects of different biological agents on noninfectious uveitis. Biological agents that target TNF-α are widely used in the clinic. Other biological agents, such as IL-6- and IL-1-neutralizing antibodies, are used in patients who do not respond to TNF inhibitors. The efficacy of IL-17 neutralizing antibodies in noninfectious uveitis is controversial. Biological agents targeting T cells and signaling pathways provide new drug options for treatment of noninfectious uveitis. However, it cannot be ignored that these biological agents have side effects, such as increasing risk of infection.

Effectiveness and safety of low-dose interferon alpha-2a treatment in Behçet’s Syndrome with refractory vascular or neurological involvement: a case series

Objective:

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of low-dose interferon alpha-2a (IFNα2a) in Behçet’s syndrome (BS) patients with refractory vascular/cardiac or neurological involvement.

Methods:

In this retrospective cohort study, we consecutively included 25 BS patients with refractory vascular/cardiac ( n = 16) or neurological involvement ( n = 9) who received IFNα2a treatment in our center between June 2018 and September 2021. The low-dose IFNα2a (3 million IU, every other day) was used as an add-on treatment with the continuation of glucocorticoids (GCs) and immunosuppressants.

Results:

In total, 25 patients (20 males, 5 females) with a mean age of 31.92 ± 9.25 years were included. IFNα2a was administered for BS patients with refractory vascular/cardiac involvement ( n = 16) and neurological involvement ( n = 9). Before the initiation of IFNα2a, patients had insufficient response or intolerance to conventional therapies. After a median follow-up of 23 [interquartile range (IQR), 11–30] months, all patients achieved clinical improvement. The Behçet’s disease Current Activity Form (BDCAF) score improved significantly (5 versus 0, median, p < 0.0001). BS Overall Damage Index (BODI) and vasculitis damage index (VDI) remain stable ( p > 0.05). Decrease in erythrocyte sedimentation rate [ESR; 24 (IQR, 12–43.5) versus 5 (IQR, 2.75–10.5) mm/h, p = 0.0001] and C-reactive protein [CRP; 6.64 (IQR, 3.67–19.82) versus 1.24 (IQR, 0.24–3.12) mg/liter, p < 0.005] was achieved effectively. The median GCs dosage tapered from 26.25 (IQR, 11.88–41.25) to 10.00 (IQR, 7.50–10.63) mg/d, p < 0.0001. Immunosuppressants were also reduced in number ( p < 0.005). No serious adverse events were observed during follow-up.

Conclusion:

Our study suggests that low-dose IFNα2a, combined with GCs and immunosuppressants, is well-tolerated and effective for BS patients with refractory vascular/cardiac or neurological involvement and has a steroid- and immunosuppressant-sparing effect.

Ocular Manifestations of Behçet's Disease: An Update on Diagnostic Challenges and Disease Management

Behçet's disease is a systemic vasculitis that affects multiple organs. The most common manifestations are oral and genital ulcerations and recurrent uveitis. Uveitis can be an initial symptom in 10-20% of cases and leads to blindness in 16-25% of patients. The management of this disease is evolving due to the clinical phenotypes recently described in the literature and increasing focus on the detection of subclinical inflammation to enable correct therapeutic decisions. The first line treatment is azathioprine, followed by various immunosuppressive and biological agents as alternatives in severe or refractory cases. This review summarizes scientific articles about the etiology of, diagnostic tools for and treatment of the ocular manifestations of Behçet's disease available in the PubMed database from 1 January 2016 to 1 May 2021. A multidisciplinary approach is necessary to effectively prevent permanent damage and thus improve the life quality of the patients. Therefore, it is crucial to raise awareness of the common clusters of symptoms, use of modern imaging methods, such as ocular computed tomography and fluorescein angiography, and novelty treatment algorithms to enable early diagnosis and appropriate management.

Comparison of the Safety and Efficacy of Interferon Alpha-2a and Cyclosporine-A When Combined With Glucocorticoid in the Treatment of Refractory Behçet's Uveitis: A Randomized Controlled Prospective Study

Purpose: To evaluate and compare the efficacy and safety of interferon alpha-2a (IFN-α2a) and cyclosporine-A (CsA) in patients with refractory Behçet’s uveitis (BU).

Methods: In this 12-month randomized, controlled, prospective trial, 26 participants (44 eyes) completed the study. Patients were randomly allocated to the IFN-α2a or CsA groups. All patients in both groups received a standardized prednisone burst and tapering schedule as per protocol. The primary outcome measures were response rate, complete remission rate, and tolerance rate. The secondary outcome measures included time to achieve complete remission, the logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) of best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), and Behçet’s disease ocular attack score 24 (BOS24). T-tests and non-parametric tests were used to compare quantitative variables, and chi-square tests were performed to compare qualitative variables.

Results: The response and complete remission rates were 85.7% (12/14 patients) and 50.0% (7/14 patients) in the IFN-α2a group, compared with 66.7% (8/12 patients) and 25.0% (3/12 patients) in the CsA group, respectively (p > 0.05). Complete remission was achieved at 3.3 and 7.0 months after initiation of IFN-α2a and CsA (p = 0.023). LogMAR BCVA significantly improved 1 month after IFN-α2a initiation (23 eyes) (p = 0.002), and this beneficial effect remained statistically significant during the entire follow-up period (p < 0.05); however, this improvement was not observed in the CsA group (21 eyes). At the endpoint, LogMAR BCVA in the IFN-α2a group was significantly better (0.22 vs. 0.31, p = 0.031) with a higher improvement rate (60.9 vs. 47.6%, p > 0.05). Moreover, compared to the CsA group, more eyes in the IFN-α2a group had a lower BOS24 score (87.0 vs. 57.1%, p = 0.042). None of the patients had any side effects that influenced the medication adherence.

Conclusion: Compared to CsA plus corticosteroid, IFN-α2a plus corticosteroid appears to induce a better treatment response, a significantly greater improvement in visual acuity, and more stable remission of intraocular inflammation in a 12-month study period.

Advances in the Treatment of Behcet's Disease

Purpose of Review

To assess current management of Behcet’s disease (BD). Controversies on therapeutic approaches to different manifestations, whether conventional immunosuppressives (IS) or biologic agents, should be chosen, and options for refractory disease are discussed.

Recent Findings

Glucocorticoids are still the main agents for remission-induction and azathioprine the first-line conventional IS in maintenance phase to prevent relapses of major organ involvement. Apremilast is shown to be a safe and effective option approved by the FDA for oral ulcers. Large case series confirmed the efficacy and safety of TNFα inhibitors and Interferon-α. Promising results are observed with IL-1 inhibitors, ustekinumab, secukinumab, and tocilizumab for refractory BD.

Summary

Although both conventional IS and biologic agents are effectively used to suppress inflammation in BD, there is still an unmet need for clear therapeutic strategies in the management for different manifestations. Further controlled studies with new biologic agents, anticoagulants and the benefit of concomitant IS usage with biologics are needed to optimize the management of BD.

Biologic Drugs for the Treatment of Noninfectious Uveitis

ABSTRACT

The management of noninfectious uveitis is constantly evolving. A new "biologic era" in treatment began after the effectiveness of tumor necrosis factor-alpha blocking drugs was demonstrated in rheumatologic inflammatory diseases. The goal of specific immunomodulation with a biologic drug is to target inflammation at the molecular level with a low rate of serious adverse events. The purpose of this review is to summarize current knowledge of biologic drugs in the treatment of noninfectious uveitis by describing clinical studies and recent pharmacological developments.

[Progress in interferon: A treatment of Behcet syndrome]

Behcet syndrome (BS) is a chronic systemic inflammatory disorder involving vessels of all sizes, characterized by relapsing episodes of oral and/or genital ulcers, as well as skin lesions. Ocular, vascular, gastrointestinal, neurological system involvement can cause significant morbidity and mortality. Glucocorticoids and immunosuppressants are the cornerstones for the management of BS. Biologic agents has been recommended for severe and/or refractory BS. Interferon-α (IFN-α) had multiple biological effects, such as antiviral and antiproliferative, that could regulate both innate and adaptive immunity in BS. Growing evidence showed the efficacy of IFN-α in severe and/or refractory BS. Many studies have demonstrated that IFN-α has comparable effectiveness and tolerance profiles as anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) agents for Behcet's uveitis with a much lower cost and steroid-and immunosuppressant-sparing effects. IFN-α has been recommended as second-line therapy for ocular involvement of BS in EULAR (The European League Against Rheumatism) 2018. IFN-α also improves mucocutaneous lesions in BS with the dosage from 3 to 9-12 million IU three times per week. A few cases indicated the therapeutic potential of IFN-α in intestinal BS. As a new trial of IFN-α in vascular BS (VBS), a recent study revealed the lower relapse rate and higher recanalization rate with IFN-α in lower extremity deep vein thrombosis (DVT). Another two case reports presented the efficacy of IFN-α in pulmonary artery involvement in BS. Also, case reports have shown successful treatment in refractory neurological involvement. There are two subtypes of IFN-α commonly used in autoimmune diseases, named IFN-α2a and IFN-α2b. IFN-α2a seemed more effective than IFN-α2b, especially in ocular and mucocutaneous involvement of BS. Side effects of IFN-α are dose-dependent and not severe. The most frequent side effects are flu-like syndrome, mild leukopenia and alopecia. Considering the potential risk of tuberculosis (TB) and hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation of TNF-α inhibitors, IFN-α is safe due to its anti-HBV effect and protective effect on TB. In conclusion, IFN-α is a promising choice for severe and/or refractory BS patients, especially for those who are intolerant or contraindicant to other biological agents, such as TNF inhibitors. Further prospective controlled studies are warranted to confirm the efficacy and safety of IFN-α in BS.