Skin barrier status during dupilumab treatment in patients with severe atopic dermatitis

Stratum Corneum Hydration As a Potential Marker of Response to Dupilumab in Atopic Dermatitis®: A Prospective Observational Study

Background: Dupilumab is an effective treatment for atopic Dermatitis® (AD) and it also restores skin barrier function. Nevertheless, early changes in epidermal barrier parameters related to sustained treatment response or treatment failure are not known. So, the objective of this study is to evaluate whether changes in skin barrier function after 16 weeks dupilumab treatment could predict sustained treatment response or treatment failure. Materials and Methods: A prospective observational study was conducted that included patients with AD starting dupilumab. Clinical scores, patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), and skin barrier function parameters were assessed at baseline and after 16 weeks treatment. Patients were followed until they failed to dupilumab or until the end of the study period. Participants were divided into 2 groups: patients with treatment failure and those with sustained treatment response. Results: In total, 32 patients with AD were included in the study, with a mean age of 28.03 years (standard deviation 10.65), being 20 (60.6%) females. In total, 22 (66.7%) patients sustained dupilumab response during the study period and only 10 (33.3%) failed to treatment. After 16 weeks treatment, clinical scores were improved in both groups. Patients with sustained treatment response increased stratum corneum hydration (SCH) on noninvolved skin (34.25 arbitrary units [AU] vs 44.90AU, P = 0.001) and on eczematous lesions (20.71 AU vs 40.94 AU, P < 0.001) and also decreased transepidermal water loss (TEWL) on eczematous lesions (28.22 g/[m2·h] vs 14.83 g/[m2·h], P = 0.002). Patients with treatment failure did not change TEWL or SCH. SCH after 16 weeks treatment on noninvolved skin (odds ratio [OR] = 0.83, P = 0.018) and SCH after 16 weeks treatment on eczematous lesions (OR = 0.86, P = 0.028) were related to dupilumab failure. Conclusion: SCH could be used as a predictive biomarker of dupilumab response in patients with AD.

A Review of Dupilumab in the Treatment of Atopic Dermatitis in Infants and Children

Atopic dermatitis (AD), a common pruritic and chronic inflammatory skin disease, has a major impact on a patient's quality of life. It is characterized by dry, itchy, and eczema-like rashes. AD is more prevalent in young children and has been linked to a variety of other allergy disorders. Traditional drug therapy has certain limitations for treating young children with AD. However, biologics have good clinical application prospects in the medical treatment of young patients. Dupilumab, a fully human monoclonal antibody, specifically binds to the IL-4 Rα subunit, inhibiting IL-4 and IL-13 signaling and blocking the occurrence of type 2 inflammatory response. It has a good effect on treating infants and children with moderate-to-severe AD. This review explores the safety and efficacy of dupilumab in the treatment of AD in infants and children and the impact of early intervention on AD progression, with the aim of informing clinical practice in the use of dupilumab for the treatment of young patients with AD.

Skin infections during dupilumab monotherapy in moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis - a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials

OBJECTIVE

Atopic dermatitis (AD) increases the risk of bacterial and viral cutaneous infections. This study assesses the risk of skin infections related to dupilumab monotherapy in moderate-to-severe AD.

METHODS

We searched PubMed/Medline, Embase, Web of Science, ClinicalTrials.gov, and Cochrane Library. For gray literature, Google Scholar was searched. A meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) for overall skin infections, eczema herpeticum, nonherpetic skin infections and subgroup meta-analysis based on overall herpetic infection type was performed.

RESULTS

We observed a statistically significant (p < 0.005) lower incidence rate in the dupilumab group compared to placebo for overall skin infections (Risk Ratio [RR] = 0.59, 95% confidence interval [CI]: [0.47, 0.75], P < 0.0001) and nonherpetic skin infections (RR = 0.42, 95% CI: [0.27, 0.66], P = 0.0001). For herpetic infections in 2b phase studies a meta-analysis demonstrated significantly higher events in dupilumab group compared to placebo (RR = 3.38, 95% CI: [1.98, 5.76], P < 0.00001, test for subgroup differences: P = 0.02, I2 = 65.6%).

CONCLUSIONS

In moderate-to-severe AD, dupilumab in monotherapy may be an effective and safe therapeutic approach, not associated with an increased risk of overall skin infections and nonherpetic skin infections. Due to the lack of statistical significance in heterogeneity associated with potential confounders in some cases, results should be interpreted cautiously.

REGISTRATION

The meta-analysis was registered in PROSPERO, ID: CRD42023441346.

Survey of topical exposure concerns for patients and caregivers dealing with atopic dermatitis

Background

Despite the recent expansion of treatment options in atopic dermatitis (AD), most management responsibilities fall on the patient and/or caregivers. Disease control often requires vigilance about and avoidance of common exposures, however the concerns for patients and caregivers living with AD have not been well enumerated.

Methods

An IRB approved survey was distributed to the public to evaluate the patient and caregiver concerns for topical exposures and potential triggers.

Results

323 people accessed the link to the survey with 259 providing response to at least one section of questions (response rate 80.2%). Results indicated that temperature and other weather related changes were the most common trigger. Nearly all respondents avoided at least one topical ingredient, with fragrances being the most common. Steroid exposure was common, however respondents expressed concerns about overall steroid exposure.

Conclusions

Our results attempt to enumerate the daily topical exposure concerns for patients and caregivers living with AD. While our online survey is both limited and without mechanistic insights, our results provide insight to providers by highlighting the role of temperature in AD symptoms; identifying commonly perceived triggers; indicating the value of provider insight for topical product selection; and indicating that no specific aspect of topical corticosteroid exposure may alleviate the general steroid concerns for patients or caregivers.

Dupilumab Improves Skin Barrier Function in Adults with Atopic Dermatitis: A Prospective Observational Study

Epidermal barrier dysfunction plays an important role in atopic dermatitis (AD). The difficulty of objectively assessing AD severity and the introduction of new biologicals into clinical practice highlight the need to find parameters to monitor clinical outcomes. The aim of this study is to evaluate the impact of dupilumab on skin barrier function and compare it with other treatments in patients with AD. A prospective observational study was conducted in adults with AD treated with topical corticosteroids (TCS), cyclosporine, or dupilumab. The main outcome measures after 16 weeks of treatment were Eczema Area and Severity (EASI)-50 (50% improvement in EASI), and transepidermal water loss (TEWL)-50 (50% improvement in TEWL). Forty-six patients with AD were included in the study. The proportion of patients who achieved EASI-50 at week 16 was significantly higher in patients receiving dupilumab (81.8% vs. 28.6% vs. 40%, p = 0.004). In eczematous lesions, TEWL decreased in patients receiving dupilumab (31.02 vs. 12.10 g·h−1·m−2, p < 0.001) and TCS (25.30 vs. 14.88 g·h−1·m−2, p = 0.047). The proportion of patients who achieved TEWL-50 at week 16 was higher for dupilumab than for cyclosporine or TCS. Temperature only decreased in the dupilumab group. Stratum corneum hydration increased in eczematous lesions and non-involved skin only in patients with dupilumab. In conclusion, dupilumab improves skin barrier function in patients with AD better than TCS or cyclosporine, both in eczematous lesions and in non-lesioned skin.

Aquaporins Are One of the Critical Factors in the Disruption of the Skin Barrier in Inflammatory Skin Diseases

The skin is the largest organ of the human body, serving as an effective mechanical barrier between the internal milieu and the external environment. The skin is widely considered the first-line defence of the body, with an essential function in rejecting pathogens and preventing mechanical, chemical, and physical damages. Keratinocytes are the predominant cells of the outer skin layer, the epidermis, which acts as a mechanical and water-permeability barrier. The epidermis is a permanently renewed tissue where undifferentiated keratinocytes located at the basal layer proliferate and migrate to the overlying layers. During this migration process, keratinocytes undertake a differentiation program known as keratinization process. Dysregulation of this differentiation process can result in a series of skin disorders. In this context, aquaporins (AQPs), a family of membrane channel proteins allowing the movement of water and small neutral solutes, are emerging as important players in skin physiology and skin diseases. Here, we review the role of AQPs in skin keratinization, hydration, keratinocytes proliferation, water retention, barrier repair, wound healing, and immune response activation. We also discuss the dysregulated involvement of AQPs in some common inflammatory dermatological diseases characterised by skin barrier disruption.