The road from intermittently scanned continuous glucose monitoring to hybrid closed-loop systems. Part B: results from randomized controlled trials

Early feasibility study with an implantable near-infrared spectroscopy sensor for glucose, ketones, lactate and ethanol

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the safety and performance of an implantable near-infrared (NIR) spectroscopy sensor for multi-metabolite monitoring of glucose, ketones, lactate, and ethanol.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

This is an early feasibility study (GLOW, NCT04782934) including 7 participants (4 with type 1 diabetes (T1D), 3 healthy volunteers) in whom the YANG NIR spectroscopy sensor (Indigo) was implanted for 28 days. Metabolic challenges were used to vary glucose levels (40-400 mg/dL, 2.2-22.2 mmol/L) and/or induce increases in ketones (ketone drink, up to 3.5 mM), lactate (exercise bike, up to 13 mM) and ethanol (4-8 alcoholic beverages, 40-80g). NIR spectra for glucose, ketones, lactate, and ethanol levels analyzed with partial least squares regression were compared with blood values for glucose (Biosen EKF), ketones and lactate (GlucoMen LX Plus), and breath ethanol levels (ACE II Breathalyzer). The effect of potential confounders on glucose measurements (paracetamol, aspartame, acetylsalicylic acid, ibuprofen, sorbitol, caffeine, fructose, vitamin C) was investigated in T1D participants.

RESULTS

The implanted YANG sensor was safe and well tolerated and did not cause any infectious or wound healing complications. Six out 7 sensors remained fully operational over the entire study period. Glucose measurements were sufficiently accurate (overall mean absolute (relative) difference MARD of 7.4%, MAD 8.8 mg/dl) without significant impact of confounders. MAD values were 0.12 mM for ketones, 0.16 mM for lactate, and 0.18 mM for ethanol.

CONCLUSIONS

The first implantable multi-biomarker sensor was shown to be well tolerated and produce accurate measurements of glucose, ketones, lactate, and ethanol.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clinical trial identifier: NCT04782934.

Glucose control and psychosocial outcomes with use of automated insulin delivery for 12 to 96 weeks in type 1 diabetes: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

BACKGROUND

Glycaemic control of Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus (T1DM) remains a challenge due to hypoglycaemic episodes and the burden of insulin self-management. Advancements have been made with the development of automated insulin delivery (AID) devices, yet, previous reviews have only assessed the use of AID over days or weeks, and potential benefits with longer time of AID use in this population remain unclear.

METHODS

 We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials comparing AID (hybrid and fully closed-loop systems) to usual care (sensor augmented pumps, multiple daily insulin injections, continuous glucose monitoring and predictive low-glucose suspend) for adults and children with T1DM with a minimum duration of 3 months. We searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central, and Clinicaltrials.gov for studies published up until April 4, 2023. Main outcomes included time in range 70-180 mg/dL as the primary outcome, and change in HbA1c (%, mmol/mol), glucose variability, and psychosocial impact (diabetes distress, treatment satisfaction and fear of hypoglycaemia) as secondary outcomes. Adverse events included diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) and severe hypoglycaemia. Statistical analyses were conducted using mean differences and odds ratios. Sensitivity analyses were performed according to age, study duration and type of AID device. The protocol was registered in PROSPERO, CRD42022366710.

RESULTS

We identified 25 comparisons from 22 studies (six crossover and 16 parallel designs) including a total of 2376 participants (721 in adult studies, 621 in paediatric studies, and 1034 in combined studies) which were eligible for analysis. Use of AID devices ranged from 12 to 96 weeks. Patients using AID had 10.87% higher time in range [95% CI 9.38 to 12.37; p < 0.0001, I2 = 87%) and 0.37% (4.77 mmol/mol) lower HbA1c (95% CI - 0.49% (- 6.39 mmol/mol) to - 0.26 (- 3.14 mmol/mol); p < 0·0001, I2 = 77%]. AID systems decreased night hypoglycaemia, time in hypoglycaemia and hyperglycaemia and improved patient distress, with no increase in the risk of DKA or severe hypoglycaemia. No difference was found regarding treatment satisfaction or fear of hypoglycaemia. Among children, there was no difference in glucose variability or time spent in hypoglycaemia between the use of AID systems or usual care. In sensitivity analyses, results remained consistent with the overall analysis favouring AID.

CONCLUSION

The use of AID systems over 12 weeks, regardless of technical or clinical differences, improved glycaemic outcomes and diabetes distress without increasing the risk of adverse events in adults and children with T1DM.

Impact on glucometric variables and quality of life of the advanced hybrid closed-loop system in pediatric and adolescent type 1 diabetes

BACKGROUND

In recent years, technological advances in the field of diabetes have revolutionized the management, prognosis, and quality of life of diabetes patients and their environment. The aim of our study was to evaluate the impact of implementing the MiniMed 780G closed-loop system in a pediatric and adolescent population previously treated with a continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion pump and intermittent glucose monitoring.

METHODS

Data were collected from 28 patients with type 1 diabetes aged 6 to 17 years, with a follow-up of 6 months. We included both glucometric and quality of life variables, as well as quality of life in primary caregivers. Metabolic control variables were assessed at baseline (before system change) and at different cutoff points after initiation of the closed-loop system (48 hours, 7 days, 14 days, 21 days, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months).

RESULTS

Time in range 70-180 mg/dL increased from 59.44% at baseline to 74.29% in the first 48 hours after automation of the new system, and this improvement was maintained at the other cutoff points, as was time in hyperglycemia 180-250 mg/dL (24.44% at baseline to 18.96% at 48 hours) and >250 mg/dL (11.71% at baseline to 3.82% at 48 hours).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study showed an improvement in time in range and in all time spent in hyperglycemia from the first 48 hours after the automation of the system, which was maintained at 6 months.

Randomised controlled trial of Advanced Hybrid Closed Loop in an Adult Population with Type 1 Diabetes (ADAPT): study protocol and rationale

INTRODUCTION

For many people with type 1 diabetes who struggle to achieve glycaemic control with multiple daily injections of insulin (MDI) plus self-monitoring of blood glucose, MDI plus intermittently scanned continuous glucose monitoring (IS-CGM) or real-time continuous glucose monitoring (RT-CGM), or insulin administration using insulin pump therapy represent optimised care in many regions. Through technological advances an advanced hybrid closed loop (AHCL) system has been developed; studies of incremental effects relative to MDI plus IS-CGM are lacking.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

The Advanced Hybrid Closed Loop study in Adult Population with Type 1 Diabetes (ADAPT) study is a multinational, prospective, open-label, confirmatory and exploratory randomised controlled trial to examine outcomes with the MiniMed 670G version 4.0 AHCL system (with an equivalent algorithm and commercialised as the MiniMed 780G system, referred to as AHCL) relative to MDI plus IS-CGM in adults with baseline HbA1c≥8.0%. An exploratory cohort will compare AHCL with MDI plus RT-CGM. The study will be conducted in approximately 124 adults on MDI plus either IS-CGM or RT-CGM for at least 3 months prior to screening. The primary endpoint will be the difference in mean HbA1c change from baseline to 6 months between the AHCL and the MDI plus IS-CGM arms. Secondary endpoints will include proportion of time spent in hypoglycaemic, euglycaemic and hyperglycaemic ranges.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The ADAPT study will be conducted in accordance with the requirements of the Declaration of Helsinki and local laws and regulations, and has been approved by ethics committees. The trial will provide valuable information on the incremental benefits that may be provided by AHCL for patients failing to achieve glycaemic targets on MDI plus IS-CGM or RT-CGM and form a basis for health economic evaluations to support market access.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT04235504; Pre-results.

A practical approach to continuous glucose monitoring (rtCGM) and FreeStyle Libre systems (isCGM) in children and young people with Type 1 diabetes

Real-time continuous glucose monitoring (rtCGM) and FreeStyle Libre glucose monitoring systems (isCGM) are new evolving technologies used in the management of Type 1 diabetes. They offer potential to improve diabetes control and reduce hypoglycaemia. rtCGM can be linked to insulin pump providing hybrid closed loop therapy. Families of children and young people are keen to have the benefit from these technologies. These are relatively expensive so it is important that health care professionals, families of children and young people (CYP) with diabetes are adequately trained in the use of these devices. Health care professionals need to be able to make patient selection based on individual needs and preferences to achieve maximum benefit. Association of Children's Diabetes Clinicians (ACDC) developed a comprehensive guideline in 2017 to help identify which patients may be most likely to benefit and how these technologies may be practically implemented. Since then new technologies have been introduced and the use of GCM has expanded in routine clinical practice. This article, aims to provide a practical approach and help identify which patients may be most likely to benefit and how the technology may be implemented in order to maximise the clinical benefits.

Effect of nationwide reimbursement of real-time continuous glucose monitoring on HbA1c, hypoglycemia and quality of life in a pediatric type 1 diabetes population: The RESCUE-pediatrics study

OBJECTIVE

Real-time continuous glucose monitoring (RT-CGM) can improve metabolic control and quality of life (QoL), but long-term real-world data in children with type 1 diabetes (T1D) are scarce. Over a period of 24 months, we assessed the impact of RT-CGM reimbursement on glycemic control and QoL in children/adolescents with T1D treated with insulin pumps.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

We conducted a multicenter prospective observational study. Primary endpoint was the change in HbA1c. Secondary endpoints included change in time in hypoglycemia, QoL, hospitalizations for hypoglycemia and/or ketoacidosis and absenteeism (school for children, work for parents).

RESULTS

Between December 2014 and February 2019, 75 children/adolescents were followed for 12 (n = 62) and 24 months (n = 50). Baseline HbA1c was 7.2 ± 0.7% (55 ± 8mmol/mol) compared to 7.1 ± 0.8% (54 ± 9mmol/mol) at 24 months (p = 1.0). Participants with a baseline HbA1c ≥ 7.5% (n = 27, mean 8.0 ± 0.3%; 64 ± 3mmol/mol) showed an improvement at 4 months (7.6 ± 0.7%; 60 ± 8mmol/mol; p = 0.009) and at 8 months (7.5 ± 0.6%; 58 ± 7mmol/mol; p = 0.006), but not anymore thereafter (endpoint 24 months: 7.7 ± 0.9%; 61 ± 10mmol/mol; p = 0.2). Time in hypoglycemia did not change over time. QoL for parents and children remained stable. Need for assistance by ambulance due to hypoglycemia reduced from 8 to zero times per 100 patient-years (p = 0.02) and work absenteeism for parents decreased from 411 to 214 days per 100 patient-years (p = 0.03), after 24 months.

CONCLUSION

RT-CGM in pump-treated children/adolescents with T1D showed a temporary improvement in HbA1c in participants with a baseline HbA1c ≥ 7.5%, without increasing time in hypoglycemia. QoL was not affected. Importantly, RT-CGM reduced the need for assistance by ambulance due to hypoglycemia and reduced work absenteeism for parents after 24 months.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

[ClinicalTrials.gov], identifier [NCT02601729].

Rapid-acting insulin analogues: Theory and best clinical practice in type 1 and type 2 diabetes

Since the discovery of insulin 100 years ago, insulin preparations have improved significantly. Starting from purified animal insulins, evolving to human insulins produced by genetically modified organisms, and ultimately to insulin analogues, all in an attempt to mimic physiological insulin action profiles seen in individuals without diabetes. Achieving strict glucose control without hypoglycaemia and preventing chronic complications of diabetes while preserving quality of life remains a challenging goal, but the advent of newer ultra-rapid-acting insulin analogues may enable intensive insulin therapy without being too disruptive to daily life. Ultra-rapid-acting insulin analogues can be administered shortly before meals and give better coverage of mealtime-induced glucose excursions than conventional insulin preparations. They also increase convenience with timing of bolus dosing. In this review, we focus on the progress that has been made in rapid-acting insulins. We summarize pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic data, clinical trial data supporting the use of these new formulations as part of a basal-bolus regimen and continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion, and provide a clinical perspective to help guide healthcare professionals when and for whom to use ultra-fast-acting insulins.

Glucose control using fast-acting insulin aspart in a real-world setting: A 1-year, two-centre study in people with type 1 diabetes using continuous glucose monitoring

AIM

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of switching from traditional mealtime insulins to fast-acting insulin aspart (Fiasp) in a "real-world" clinical practice setting in adult people with type 1 diabetes (PWD1) who were using intermittently scanned or real-time continuous glucose monitoring (isCGM or rtCGM, respectively).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data from 438 adult PWD1 (60% men, age 44.6 ± 16.2 years, diabetes duration 21.5 ± 14.0 years, isCGM/rtCGM: 391/47, multiple daily injections/continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion: 409/29), who initiated Fiasp from January 2018 to May 2020, were analysed. The primary objective was the evolution of time in range (TIR; 70-180 mg/dL) at 6 and 12 months. Secondary objectives included change in HbA1c, body mass index (BMI), insulin doses, time below range (<70 and <54 mg/dL), and time above range (>180 and >250 mg/dL).

RESULTS

TIR improved from 50.3% ± 15.6% to 54.3% ± 15.1% at 6 months (n = 425) and to 55.5% ± 15.2% at 12 months (n = 385) (P < .001), corresponding to 57 min/d at 6 months and 75 min/d at 12 months. Time spent below 54 mg/dL evolved from 3.1% ± 3.3% to 3.1% ± 3.7% and 2.5% ± 3.0% at 6 and 12 months, respectively (P = .011). Also, time spent above 180 mg/dL decreased from 42.3% ± 16.7% at start by 4.2% at 6 months and by 4.6% at 12 months (P < .001). The proportion of people reaching TIR more than 70% increased from 11.0% to 14.8% (P = .002), and those spending less than 4% at time less than 70 mg/dL increased from 36.1% to 42.1% (P = .002). After 12 months, HbA1c, insulin doses, and BMI did not change significantly.

CONCLUSIONS

In a Belgian real-world setting of adult PWD1, switching to Fiasp was associated with a 5% increased TIR after 12 months, corresponding to 75 min/d, in combination with less time spent below and above range.

Real-World Experience With Automated Insulin Pump Technology in Veterans With Type 1 Diabetes

BACKGROUND

Advancements in diabetes technology now allow insulin pump and continuous glucose monitor (CGM) technology to be a part of usual US Department Veterans Affairs (VA) clinical care. The automated insulin pump (AIP) delivers insulin automatically based on CGM readings. In randomized clinical trials the closed-loop system has shown to improve glycemic control in children and younger adults with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) while preventing hypoglycemia. However, its safety and efficacy is less well known in older veterans with T1DM. In this VA pilot study, we aimed to assess AIP technology in the real world of an older population of veterans with T1DM followed in the outpatient setting.

METHODS

Thirty-seven patients with T1DM new to AIP seen at the Malcom Randall VA Medical Center in Gainesville, Florida, were evaluated between March and December of 2018 on an Medtronic Minimed 670G Insulin Pump System. We collected demographic as well as clinical data before and after the initiation of AIP, including standard insulin pump/CGM information (sensor wear, time in target glucose range, time in automated mode, other).

RESULTS

At the time of the initiation of AIP, the mean (SD) age of patients was 59.1 (14.4) years; 35 identified as male and 2 as female. The mean (SD) duration of T1DM was 25.3 (12.0) years. Patients transitioned from either insulin injections or other non-AIP pump to AIP safely-there was no increase in hypoglycemia, and the mean (SD) hemoglobin A1c decreased from 7.6% (0.8) to 7.3% (0.8) by the second follow-up visit.

CONCLUSION

In this real-world study, AIP use was both safe and viable as a tool for T1DM management with older veterans. This technology further engaged veterans in monitoring their blood sugars and achieving more optimal glycemic control. Future long-term, larger studies are much needed in this setting.

Effect of an Integrated, Multidisciplinary Nationwide Approach to Type 1 Diabetes Care on Metabolic Outcomes: An Observational Real-World Study

Objective: Achieving good metabolic control in people with type 1 diabetes (T1D) remains a challenge, despite the evolutions in diabetes technologies over the past decade. Here we investigate the evolution of metabolic control in people with T1D, where care is provided by specialized centers with access to technology, diabetes education, and regular follow-up. Methods: Data were cross-sectionally collected between 2010 and 2018 from more than 100 centers in Belgium. The evolutions over time of hemoglobin A1C (HbA1c), low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, and systolic blood pressure (SBP) were investigated, together with the evolutions of use of insulin pump (continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion [CSII]), continuous glucose monitoring (CGM), and lipid-lowering and antihypertensive drugs. Association of HbA1c with gender, age, diabetes duration, and technology use was analyzed on the most recent cohort. Results: The study population contained data from 89,834 people with T1D (age 1-80 years). Mean HbA1c decreased from 65 mmol/mol (8.1%) in 2010-2011 to 61 mmol/mol (7.7%) in 2017-2018 (P < 0.0001, adjusted for gender, age, diabetes duration, and technology use). Respectively, mean LDL cholesterol decreased from 2.45 mmol/L (94.6 mg/dL) to 2.29 mmol/L (88.5 mg/dL) (P < 0.0001, adjusted for gender, age, and diabetes duration), and mean SBP remained stable. CGM usage increased, whereas the use of CSII and lipid-lowering and antihypertensive drugs remained stable. Gender, age, diabetes duration, and technology use were independently associated with HbA1c. Conclusions: Our real-world data show that metabolic and lipid control improved over time in a system where T1D care is organized through specialized multidisciplinary centers with emphasis on linking education to provision of technology, and its quality is monitored.

A Systematic Review of Collective Evidences Investigating the Effect of Diabetes Monitoring Systems and Their Application in Health Care

INTRODUCTION

Diabetes monitoring systems (DMS) are a possible approach for regular control of glucose levels in patients with Type 1 or 2 diabetes in order to improve therapeutic outcomes or to identify and modify inappropriate patient behaviors in a timely manner. Despite the significant number of studies observing the DMS, no collective evidence is available about the effect of all devices.

GOAL

To review and consolidate evidences from multiple systematic reviews on the diabetes monitoring systems and the outcomes achieved.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Internet-based search in PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane was performed to identify all studies relevant to the research question. The data regarding type of intervention, type of diabetes mellitus, type of study, change in clinical parameter(s), or another relevant outcome were extracted and summarized.

RESULTS

Thirty-three out of 1,495 initially identified studies, involving more than 44,100 patients with Type 1, Type 2, or gestational diabetes for real-time or retrospective Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGMS), Sensor Augmented Pump Therapy (SAPT), Self-monitoring Blood Glucose (SMBG), Continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII), Flash Glucose Monitoring (FGM), Closed-loop systems and telemonitoring, were included. Most of the studies observed small nominal effectiveness of DMS. In total 11 systematic reviews and 15 meta-analyses, with most focusing on patients with Type 1 diabetes (10 and 6, respectively), reported a reduction in glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) levels from 0.17 to 0.70% after use of DMS.

CONCLUSION

Current systematic review of already published systematic reviews and meta-analyses suggests that no statistically significant difference exists between the values of HbA1c as a result of application of any type of DMS. The changes in HbA1c values, number and frequency of hypoglycemic episodes, and time in glucose range are the most valuable for assessing the appropriateness and effectiveness of DMS. Future more comprehensive studies assessing the effectiveness, cost-effectiveness, and comparative effectiveness of DMS are needed to stratify them for the most suitable diabetes patients' subgroups.

Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials Evaluating Glycemic Efficacy and Patient Satisfaction of Intermittent-Scanned Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Patients with Diabetes

Introduction: Intermittent-scanned continuous glucose monitoring (isCGM) has the ability to allow for greater personalization of diabetes self-management. The purpose of this systematic review is to provide an updated analysis of the efficacy and patient satisfaction of isCGM in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Methods: A research librarian searched PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library using keywords and subject headings to identify studies assessing efficacy and use of isCGMs in patients with T1DM and T2DM. Results: Nine randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving patients with T1DM and T2DM using isCGM were included. Based on available RCT evidence investigating isCGM in patients with diabetes, isCGM may lead to a small decrease hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) in certain subgroups of patients with uncontrolled T2DM (those using multiple daily insulin injections and aged 65 years or younger). Patients with uncontrolled T1DM using insulin may also benefit from isCGM, when combined with a structured diabetes education program. Evidence is mixed regarding isCGM impact on improving time in glycemic range, glycemic variability, and hypoglycemia. isCGM has demonstrated greater patient satisfaction and lower diabetes distress compared with usual care. Conclusions: isCGM may lead to improvements in HbA1c in certain subgroups of patients. Additional benefit with isCGM on time in glycemic range, glycemic variability, and hypoglycemia is unclear at this time. Future clinical trials are warranted to investigate the role of isCGM in patients with uncontrolled T2DM using insulin and oral antidiabetic drugs.