Safety of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors in older adults with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Hypoglycemic agents and bone health; an umbrella systematic review of the clinical trials' meta-analysis studies

BACKGROUND

No clear consensus exists regarding the safest anti-diabetic drugs with the least adverse events on bone health. This umbrella systematic review therefore aims to assess the published meta-analysis studies of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) conducted in this field.

METHODS

All relevant meta-analysis studies of RCTs assessing the effects of anti-diabetic agents on bone health in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) were collected in line with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). English articles published until 15 March 2023 were collected through the search of Cochrane Library, Scopus, ISI Web of Sciences, PubMed, and Embase using the terms "Diabetes mellitus", "anti-diabetic drugs", "Bone biomarker", "Bone fracture, "Bone mineral density" and their equivalents. The methodological and evidence quality assessments were performed for all included studies.

RESULTS

From among 2220 potentially eligible studies, 71 meta-analyses on diabetic patients were included. Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT-is) showed no or equivalent effect on the risk of fracture. Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP-4is) and Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1Ras) were reported to have controversial effects on bone fracture, with some RCTs pointing out the bone protective effects of certain members of these two medication classes. Thiazolidinediones (TZDs) were linked with increased fracture risk as well as higher concentrations of C-terminal telopeptide of type I collagen (CTx), a bone resorption marker.

CONCLUSION

The present systematic umbrella review observed varied results on the association between the use of anti-diabetic drugs and DM-related fracture risk. The clinical efficacy of various anti-diabetic drugs, therefore, should be weighed against their risks and benefits in each patient.

Systematic review of guideline recommendations for older and frail adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus

BACKGROUND

The application of clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) across the spectrum of individuals living with diabetes can be challenging, particularly in older adults, where factors such as frailty and multimorbidity exacerbate the complexity of management.

OBJECTIVE

This systematic review aimed to explore the guidance provided within diabetes CPGs for management of individuals who are older and/or frail, including recommendations for haemoglobin A1C (HbA1c) target and pharmacotherapeutic management.

METHODS

A systematic search was completed in Medline and Embase to identify national or international type 2 diabetes CPGs published in the last 10 years. Data extracted included recommendations for HbA1c targets and pharmacotherapy in older and frail adults, frailty screening and deprescribing. Quality of included CPGs was appraised with the AGREE II tool.

RESULTS

Twenty-three CPGs were included, within which older adults and frailty were discussed in 21 and 14 CPGs, respectively. Specific HbA1c targets for older and/or frail adults were provided by 15 CPGs, the majority of which suggested a strict target (<7.0%-7.5%) in healthier older adults and a more relaxed target (<8.0%-8.5%) in those who are frail or medically complex. Ten CPGs provided recommendations for insulin therapy and 16 provided recommendations for non-insulin antihyperglycaemic agents that were specific to older and/or frail populations, which primarily focused on minimising risk of hypoglycaemia.

CONCLUSION

Most diabetes CPGs recommend strict HbA1c targets in healthier older adults, with more relaxed targets in those living with frailty or medical complexity. However, significant variability exists in pharmacotherapy recommendations and there were proportionately less recommendations for individuals who are frail.

Safety and Efficiency of Dipeptidyl Peptidase IV Inhibitors in Patients with Diabetic Kidney Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background

To investigate the safety and efficiency of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors in patients with diabetic kidney disease.

Methods

We conducted a comprehensive literature search across multiple databases, including Embase, PubMed, CNKI, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, from inception to January 2024. The search focused on randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that directly compared DPP-4 inhibitors with placebos or other glucose-lowering therapies. A meta-analysis was performed to pool data and quantify the therapeutic effects and safety profile of DPP-4 inhibitors in DKD.

Results

Twenty-three RCTs with 16,378 participants were included. DPP-4 inhibitors significantly reduced urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio (UACR) and HbA1c levels compared to controls (UACR: SMD -0.23, 95% CI: -0.41, -0.06; p = 0.01; HbA1c: SMD -0.32, 95% CI: -0.51, -0.14; p = 0.0006). A higher proportion of patients in the DPP-4 inhibitor group achieved at least a 30% reduction in UACR (OR = 1.73, 95% CI: 1.10, 2.73; p = 0.02). However, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and serum creatinine (SCr) changes were similar between groups (eGFR: p = 1.00; SCr: p = 0.67). No significant differences were found in all-cause mortality (OR = 0.94, 95% CI: 0.83, 1.06; p = 0.31) or hypoglycemia risk (OR = 1.10, 95% CI: 0.80, 1.52; p = 0.54) between the DPP-4 inhibitor and control groups.

Conclusions

DPP-4 inhibitors exhibit renoprotective properties, indicated by significant reductions in UACR and HbA1c levels. They do not appear to increase the risk of hypoglycemia, presenting a favorable safety profile when compared to placebo or alternative antidiabetic agents.

Adverse Effects of Gliptins in Type 2 Diabetics in Morocco

INTRODUCTION

Gliptins are a relatively recent class of oral antidiabetic agents used in the treatment of type 2 diabetes. The aim of this study is to identify the adverse effects of gliptins in patients with type 2 diabetes, compare the tolerability of these drugs with data from the literature, and determine patients' behavior in the face of these adverse effects with a view to optimizing their management.

METHODS

Our study is cross-sectional, descriptive, and analytical, involving 100 patients aged over 20 years, followed at the Endocrinology Department of the Military Hospital Mohammed V.

RESULTS

The average age of the patients was 63 years, with a sex ratio F/H of 1.13. The median age of diabetes in the patients was 13 years, with an average blood glucose level of 1.64 and an average hemoglobin A1c of 8.26. The comorbidities were 30% cardiovascular disease, 25% hypertension, and 14% dyslipidemia, and 30% of patients had no comorbidities. Forth-six percent of patients reported adverse events and 54% did not report any adverse event. Twenty-eight percent of the adverse events were gastrointestinal, 18% skin disorders, 14% urinary tract infections, 12% hypoglycemia, 12% nervous system disorders, 8% airway infections, and 8% general disorders.

CONCLUSION

This study shows that gliptins remain a safe option as the side effects seem fairly well tolerated by patients. Adverse events may impact patient compliance and pose a problem of adherence to treatment. Thus, it would be advantageous to develop therapeutic education for diabetic patients to detect and manage adverse effects.

Progress in the treatment of diabetic cardiomyopathy, a systematic review

Diabetic cardiomyopathy (DCM) is a condition characterized by myocardial dysfunction that occurs in individuals with diabetes, in the absence of coronary artery disease, valve disease, and other conventional cardiovascular risk factors such as hypertension and dyslipidemia. It is considered a significant and consequential complication of diabetes in the field of cardiovascular medicine. The primary pathological manifestations include myocardial hypertrophy, myocardial fibrosis, and impaired ventricular function, which can lead to widespread myocardial necrosis. Ultimately, this can progress to the development of heart failure, arrhythmias, and cardiogenic shock, with severe cases even resulting in sudden cardiac death. Despite several decades of both fundamental and clinical research conducted globally, there are currently no specific targeted therapies available for DCM in clinical practice, and the incidence and mortality rates of heart failure remain persistently high. Thus, this article provides an overview of the current treatment modalities and novel techniques pertaining to DCM, aiming to offer valuable insights and support to researchers dedicated to investigating this complex condition.

Fotagliptin monotherapy with alogliptin as an active comparator in patients with uncontrolled type 2 diabetes mellitus: a randomized, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial

BACKGROUND

Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP-4i) have become firmly established in treatment algorithms and national guidelines for improving glycemic control in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).To report the findings from a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 clinical trial, which was designed to assess the efficacy and safety of a novel DPP-4 inhibitor fotagliptin in treatment-naive patients with T2DM.

METHODS

Patients with T2DM were randomized to receive fotagliptin (n = 230), alogliptin (n = 113) or placebo (n = 115) at a 2:1:1 ratio for 24 weeks of double-blind treatment period, followed by an open-label treatment period, making up a total of 52 weeks. The primary efficacy endpoint was to determine the superiority of fotagliptin over placebo in the change of HbA1c from baseline to Week 24. All serious or significant adverse events were recorded.

RESULTS

After 24 weeks, mean decreases in HbA1c from baseline were -0.70% for fotagliptin, -0.72% for alogliptin and -0.26% for placebo. Estimated mean treatment differences in HbA1c were -0.44% (95% confidence interval [CI]: -0.62% to -0.27%) for fotagliptin versus placebo, and -0.46% (95% CI: -0.67% to -0.26%) for alogliptin versus placebo, and 0.02% (95%CI: -0.16% to 0.19%; upper limit of 95%CI < margin of 0.4%) for fotagliptin versus alogliptin. So fotagliptin was non-inferior to alogliptin. Compared with subjects with placebo (15.5%), significantly more patients with fotagliptin (37.0%) and alogliptin (35.5%) achieved HbA1c < 7.0% after 24 weeks of treatment. During the whole 52 weeks of treatment, the overall incidence of hypoglycemia was low for both of the fotagliptin and alogliptin groups (1.0% each). No drug-related serious adverse events were observed in any treatment group.

CONCLUSIONS

In summary, the study demonstrated improvement in glycemic control and a favorable safety profile for fotagliptin in treatment-naive patients with T2DM.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrail.gov NCT05782192.

Socioeconomic aspects of incretin-based therapy

Incretin-based therapies, particularly glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs), have demonstrated cardiovascular benefits in people with type 2 diabetes. However, socioeconomic disparities in their uptake may constrain the collective advantages offered by these medications to the broader population. In this review we examine the socioeconomic disparities in the utilisation of incretin-based therapies and discuss strategies to address these inequalities. Based on real-world evidence, the uptake of GLP-1 RAs is reduced in people who live in socioeconomically disadvantaged areas, have low income and education level, or belong to racial/ethnic minorities, even though these individuals have a greater burden of type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease. Contributing factors include suboptimal health insurance coverage, limited accessibility to incretin-based therapies, financial constraints, low health literacy and physician-patient barriers such as provider bias. Advocating for a reduction in the price of GLP-1 RAs is a pivotal initial step to enhance their affordability among lower socioeconomic groups and improve their value-for-money from a societal perspective. By implementing cost-effective strategies, healthcare systems can amplify the societal benefits of incretin-based therapies, alongside measures that include maximising treatment benefits in specific subpopulations while minimising harms in vulnerable individuals, increasing accessibility, enhancing health literacy and overcoming physician-patient barriers. A collaborative approach between governments, pharmaceutical companies, healthcare providers and people with diabetes is necessary for the effective implementation of these strategies to enhance the overall societal benefits of incretin-based therapies.

Thürmann P. Potentially Inadequate Medications in the Elderly: PRISCUS 2.0

BACKGROUND

The term potentially inadequate medication (PIM) is used to describe substances that may be unsuitable for use inthe elderly and should be avoided. The PRISCUS list, published in 2010, was the first catalog of PIM designed for the Germandrug market to become adopted in practice. While 24% of German patients aged ≥ 65 years were prescribed at least one PIMper year in 2009, the proportion in 2019 was only 14.5%.

METHODS

In a three-round Delphi process, experts from clinical practice and research evaluated whether selected substancesare PIM for the elderly. The participants were provided with dedicated literature including systematic reviews carried out for theparticular purposes of this project.

RESULTS

Fifty-nine persons took part in the Delphi process and, in addition, contributed comments and therapeutic alternatives.Altogether, 187 substances were classed as PIM. One hundred thirty-three of the substances now listed were not in the originalPRISCUS list: these include some oral antidiabetics, all of the selective COX-2 inhibitors, and moderately long acting benzodiazepinessuch as oxazepam. For some other substances, e.g., proton pump inhibitors (PPI), the advisability of treatment formore than 8 weeks was considered as potentially inappropriate, as was the use of ibuprofen in doses >1200 mg/day and formore than 1 week without PPI. Risperidone for more than 6 weeks is also PIM.

CONCLUSION

The new, greatly extended PRISCUS list must now be validated in epidemiological and prospective studies and itspracticability in routine daily use must be verified.

To do one and to get more: Part II. Diabetes and metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver diseases

Type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) is characterized by inability of faulty pancreatic β-cells to secret a normal amount of insulin to maintain normal body consumption, and/or peripheral tissue has a decreased susceptibility to insulin, resulting in hyperglycemia and insulin resistance. Similar to other chronic systemic inflammatory diseases, DM is a result from dysregulated interactions between ethnic, genetic, epigenetic, immunoregulatory, hormonal, and environmental factors. Therefore, it is rational to suppose the concept as "To do one and to get more", while using antidiabetic agents (ADA), a main pharmacologic agent for the treatment of DM, can provide an extraglycemia effect on comorbidities or concomittent comorbidities to DM. In this review, based on the much strong correlation between DM and metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver diseases (MAFLD) shown by similar pathophysiological mechanisms and a high prevalence of DM in MAFLD and its vice versa (a high prevalence of MAFLD in DM), it is possible to use the strategy to target both diseases simultaneously. We focus on a new classification of ADA, such as glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor (GLP1R) agonist and sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT-2) inhibitors to show the potential benefits of extraglycemic effect on MAFLD. We conclude that the management of DM patients, especially for those who need ADA as adjuvant therapy should include healthy lifestyle modification to overcome the metabolic syndrome, contributing to the urgent need of an effective weight-reduction strategy. GLP1R agonist is one of effective body weight-lowering medications, which may be a better choice for DM complicated with MAFLD or its-associated severe form as metabolic associated steatohepatitis (MASH), although the role of SGLT-2 inhibitors is also impressive. The prescription of these two classes of ADA may satisfy the concept "To do one and to get more", based on successful sugar-lowering effect for controlling DM and extraglycemia benefits of hepatoprotective activity in DM patients.

Analysis of acute pancreatitis associated with SGLT-2 inhibitors and predictive factors of the death risk: Based on food and drug administration adverse event report system database

Background and objectives: The US FDA and Health Canada have successively published potential red flags for acute pancreatitis caused by sodium-dependent glucose transporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT-2i). However, existing studies have focused on case reports. We aimed to assess the possible association of SGLT-2i with acute pancreatitis by analyzing postmarketing adverse events reported in the FDA adverse event reporting system (FAERS), to explore risk factors for SGLT-2i-related acute pancreatitis death, and to build a nomogram. Methods and Results: We used a disproportionality analysis of suspected acute pancreatitis-related reports in the FAERS database of patients from the use of SGLT-2i from the first quarter of 2013 to the fourth quarter of 2021. Single-factor and multi-factor logistic regression analyses were performed using the relevant clinical information of patients, and risk factors were combined with the age of patients to construct a SGLT-2i risk prediction model for acute pancreatitis-related death. A total of 757 reports were retrieved. The largest number of acute pancreatitis-related cases were caused by canagliflozin (317 reports), which was also the strongest agent associated with acute pancreatitis, with the information component (IC 2.41, lower 95% one-sided confidence interval 2.16), the reporting odds ratio (ROR 5.37, 95% two-sided confidence interval 4.8-5.99), and the empirical Bayesian geometric mean (EBGM 5.32, lower 90% one-sided confidence interval 4.85). The median time to acute pancreatitis was 54 (interquartile range [IQR] 14-131) days, and approximately 83% of adverse events occurred within 6 months. Odds ratio(OR) adjusted by acute pancreatitis and the coadministration of SGLT-2i with dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitor (DPP-4i), glucagon-like peptide 1 analog (GLP-1RA), and angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEIs) was 1.39, 1.97, and 1.34, respectively, all of which were statistically significant. Logistic regression analysis showed that different SGLT-2i type and their combinations with statins were independent risk factors for acute pancreatitis mortality in the patients (p < 0.05). The mortality risk prediction model showed good discrimination and clinical applicability in both the training set (AUC 0.708) and the validation set (AUC 0.732). Conclusion: SGLT-2i may increase the risk of acute pancreatitis especially within the first 6 months of drug administration. Combination with DPP-4i, GLP-1RA or ACEIs significantly increases the risk of acute pancreatitis. In addition, different SGLT-2i type and their combination with statins are risk factors that can predict the risk of death following acute pancreatitis.

To do one and to get more: Part I. Diabetes and bone

Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), is a chronic metabolic disease, characterized by the presence of hyperglycemia and insulin resistance. The key treatment strategies for T2DM include modification of lifestyle, medications, and continuous glucose monitoring. DM patients often have DM-associated morbidities and comorbidities; however, disorders of musculoskeletal system are often neglected, compared to other major systems in DM patients. Based on sharing similar pathophysiology of DM and osteoporosis, it is supposed that the use of antidiabetic agents (ADAs) may not only provide the lowering glucose level effect and the maintenance of the sugar homeostasis to directly delay the tissue damage secondary to hyperglycemia but also offer the benefits, such as the prevention of developing osteoporosis and fractures. Based on the current review, evidence shows the positive correlation between DM and osteoporosis or fracture, but the effectiveness of using ADA in the prevention of osteoporosis and subsequent reduction of fracture seems to be inconclusive. Although the benefits of ADA on bone health are uncertain, the potential value of "To do one and to get more" therapeutic strategy should be always persuaded. At least, one of the key treatment strategies as an establishment of healthy lifestyle may work, because it improves the status of insulin resistance and subsequently helps DM control, prevents the DM-related micro- and macrovascular injury, and possibly strengthens the general performance of musculoskeletal system. With stronger musculoskeletal system support, the risk of "fall" may be decreased, because it is associated with fracture. Although the ADA available in the market does not satisfy the policy of "To do one and to get more" yet, we are looking forward to seeing the continuously advanced technology of drug development on diabetic control, and hope to see their extra-sugar-lowering effects.