Cardiovascular events in acute coronary syndrome patients with peripheral arterial disease treated with ticagrelor compared with clopidogrel: Data from the PLATO Trial

High on-treatment platelet reactivity in peripheral arterial disease: A systematic review

OBJECTIVES

To highlight current evidence pertaining to the measurement methods and prevalence of high on-treatment platelet reactivity (HTPR) in patients with PAD, as well as to evaluate the relationship between HTPR and recurrent adverse cardiovascular and limb events in PAD patients.

METHODS

A systematic review of English-language literature on HTPR in patients with PAD. An electronic literature search of PubMed and Medline was performed in May 2021.

RESULTS

A total of 29 studies with a total number of 11,201 patients with PAD were identified. HTPR during clopidogrel treatment ranges from 9.8 to 77%, and during aspirin treatment ranges from 4.1 to 50% of PAD patients. HTPR was associated with adverse clinical outcomes. The need for limb revascularisation was higher in patients with HTPR during clopidogrel use. Similarly, HTPR during aspirin use in the PAD population was predictive of adverse cardiovascular events (HR 3.73; 95% CI, 1.43-9.81; p = .007). A wide range of techniques were applied to measure platelet resistance, without consensus on cut-off values. Furthermore, differing patient populations, a variety of antiplatelet regimens, and differing clinical endpoints highlight the high degree of heterogeneity in the studies included in this review.

CONCLUSION

No consensus on technique or cut-off values for HTPR testing has been reached. Patients with HTPR are potentially at a greater risk of adverse limb-related and cardiovascular events than patients sensitive to antiplatelet therapy illustrating the need for clinical implementation of HTPR testing. Future research must aim for consistent methodology. Adaptation of antiplatelet therapy based on HTPR results requires further exploration.

Pharmacotherapy and revascularization strategies of peripheral artery disease

The global epidemiological transition of atherosclerotic vascular diseases is witnessing a rapid redistribution of its burden, shifting from high-income to low- and middle-income countries. With a wide clinical spectrum, spanning from intermittent claudication to more complex critical limb threatening ischemia, nonhealing ulcers, gangrene as well as acute limb ischemia, peripheral artery disease is often faced with the challenges of under-diagnosis and under-treatment despite its high prevalence. The management of peripheral arterial disease in patients with multiple comorbidities presents a formidable challenge and remains a pressing global health concern. In this review, we aim to provide an in-depth overview of the pathophysiology of peripheral artery disease and explore evidence-based management strategies encompassing pharmacological, lifestyle, interventional, and surgical approaches. By addressing these challenges, the review contributes to a better understanding of the evolving landscape of peripheral artery disease, offering insights into effective and holistic management strategies.

Lifestyle Approach and Medical Therapy of Lower Extremity Peripheral Artery Disease

Lower extremity peripheral artery disease (PAD) is common among patients with several risk factors, such as elderly, smoking, hypertension, and diabetes mellitus. Notably, PAD is associated with a higher risk of cardiovascular complications. Non-invasive interventions are beneficial to improve morbidity and mortality among patients with PAD. Traditional risk factors like smoking, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and dyslipidemia play a significant role in the development of PAD. Still, additional factors such as mental health, glycemic control, diet, exercise, obesity management, lipid-lowering therapy, and antiplatelet therapy have emerged as important considerations. Managing these factors can help improve outcomes and reduce complications in PAD patients. Antiplatelet therapy with aspirin or clopidogrel is recommended in PAD patients, with clopidogrel showing more significant benefits in symptomatic PAD individuals. Managing several risk factors is crucial for improving outcomes and reducing complications in patients with PAD. Further research is also needed to explore the potential benefits of novel therapies. Ultimately, a comprehensive approach to PAD management is essential for improving morbidity and mortality among patients with this condition.

Medical Management of Peripheral Artery Disease

Peripheral artery disease (PAD) is a common type of atherosclerotic disease of the lower extremities associated with reduced quality of life and ambulatory capacity. Major adverse cardiovascular events and limb amputations are the leading cause of morbidity and mortality in this population. Optimal medical therapy is therefore critical in these patients to prevent adverse events. Risk factor modifications, including blood pressure control and smoking cessation, in addition to antithrombotic agents, peripheral vasodilators, and supervised exercise therapy are key pillars of medical therapy. Revascularization procedures represent key touch points between patients and health care providers and serve as opportunities to optimize medical therapy and improve long-term patency rates and outcomes. This review summarizes the aspects of medical therapy that all providers should be familiar with when caring for patients with PAD in the peri-revascularization period.

Risk of bleeding after percutaneous coronary intervention and its impact on further adverse events in clinical trial participants with comorbid peripheral arterial disease

BACKGROUND

Both patients with obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) and patients with peripheral arterial disease (PADs) have an increased bleeding risk. Information is scarce on bleeding in CAD patients, treated with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), who have comorbid PADs. We assessed whether PCI patients with PADs have a higher bleeding risk than PCI patients without PADs. Furthermore, in PCI patients with PADs we evaluated the extent by which bleeding increased the risk of further adverse events.

METHODS

Three-year pooled patient-level data of two randomized PCI trials (BIO-RESORT, BIONYX) with drug-eluting stents were analyzed to assess mortality and the composite endpoint major adverse cardiac events (MACE: all-cause mortality, any myocardial infarction, emergent coronary artery bypass surgery, or target lesion revascularization).

RESULTS

Among 5989 all-comer patients, followed for 3 years, bleeding occurred in 7.7% (34/440) with comorbid PADs and 5.0% (279/5549) without PADs (HR: 1.59, 95%CI: 1.11-2.23, p = 0.010). Of all PADs patients, those with a bleeding had significantly higher rates of all-cause mortality (HR: 4.70, 95%CI: 2.37-9.33, p < 0.001) and MACE (HR: 2.39, 95%CI: 1.23-4.31, p = 0.003). Furthermore, PADs patients with a bleeding were older (74.4 ± 6.9 vs. 67.4 ± 9.5, p < 0.001). After correction for age and other potential confounders, bleeding remained independently associated with all-cause mortality (adj.HR: 2.97, 95%CI: 1.37-6.43, p = 0.006) while the relation of bleeding with MACE became borderline non-significant (adj.HR: 1.85, 95%CI: 0.97-3.55, p = 0.06).

CONCLUSION

PCI patients with PADs had a higher bleeding risk than PCI patients without PADs. In PADs patients, bleeding was associated with all-cause mortality, even after adjustment for potential confounders.

Use of Thromboelastography with Platelet Mapping to Identify Prothrombotic Coagulation Profiles in Patients with History of Cardiac Intervention Undergoing Lower Extremity Revascularization

BACKGROUND

Patients with concomitant coronary and peripheral artery disease (CAD and PAD) are at significant risk for major adverse limb events (MALEs). Prevention of thrombosis in this population is of paramount importance. Identifying prothrombotic coagulation profiles in this cohort may facilitate targeted thromboprophylaxis. We compared coagulation profiles of those with CAD and PAD to those with PAD alone during the perioperative period of lower extremity revascularization.

STUDY DESIGN

Patients undergoing lower extremity revascularization underwent thromboelastography-platelet mapping (TEG-PM) analysis preoperatively and at serial intervals for up to 6 months. Coagulation profiles of patients with significant CAD (defined as history of coronary artery bypass graft or percutaneous coronary intervention) and PAD were compared with those with PAD alone. MALE in the postoperative period was recorded.

RESULTS

Four hundred seventy-seven TEG-PM samples from 114 patients were analyzed; 28.1% had a history of significant CAD. The incidence of atrial fibrillation was higher in this group. The significant CAD group had lower ADP-platelet inhibition, higher ADP-platelet aggregation, and greater maximum clot strength compared with patients with PAD alone. Patients with significant CAD were more frequently on full-dose anticoagulation, but less frequently on dual antiplatelet therapy; 28.1% of patients with significant CAD developed postoperative MALE compared with 22.9% of patients with PAD alone (p = 0.40). For both groups, patients who developed postoperative MALE demonstrated greater ADP-platelet aggregation and lower ADP-platelet inhibition.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with a history of significant CAD undergoing lower extremity revascularization demonstrated prothrombotic TEG-PM profiles, less frequent use of dual antiplatelet therapy, and greater rates of full-dose anticoagulation. Decreased platelet inhibition was also associated with postoperative MALE. This study underscores the potential utility of viscoelastic assays for coagulation profiling in complex cardiovascular patients.

Monitoring antiplatelet therapy: where are we now?

Single antiplatelet therapy represents the cornerstone of thrombosis prevention in atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT), consisting of aspirin plus a P2Y12 inhibitor, is the standard of care for patients with acute coronary syndrome or undergoing both coronary and peripheral percutaneous interventions. Recent data suggest the efficacy of DAPT also after minor stroke. In this setting, a large body of evidence has documented that genetic and acquired patients' characteristics may affect the magnitude of platelet inhibition induced by antiplatelet agents. The implementation of tools allowing the identification and prediction of platelet inhibition has recently been shown to improve outcomes, leading to an optimal balance between antithrombotic efficacy and bleeding risk. We are therefore clearly moving towards tailored antiplatelet therapy. The aim of this paper is to summarize the available evidence on the evaluation of platelet inhibition in patients with coronary, peripheral, or cerebrovascular atherosclerosis. We will here focus on antiplatelet therapy based on both aspirin and P2Y12 inhibitors. In addition, we provide practical insights into the clinical settings in which it appears reasonable to implement antiplatelet therapy monitoring.

Antithrombotic Therapy for Symptomatic Peripheral Arterial Disease: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

High-quality evidence from trials directly comparing single antiplatelet therapies in symptomatic peripheral arterial disease (PAD) to dual antiplatelet therapies or acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) plus low-dose rivaroxaban is lacking. Therefore, we conducted a network meta-analysis on the effectiveness of all antithrombotic regimens studied in PAD.

METHODS

A systematic search was conducted to identify randomized controlled trials. The primary endpoints were major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and major bleedings. Secondary endpoints were major adverse limb events (MALE) and acute limb ischaemia (ALI). For each outcome, a frequentist network meta-analysis was used to compare relative risks (RRs) between medication and ASA. ASA was the universal comparator since a majority of studies used ASA as in the reference group.

RESULTS

Twenty-four randomized controlled trials were identified including 48,759 patients. With regard to reducing MACE, clopidogrel [RR 0.78, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.66-0.93], ticagrelor (RR 0.79, 95% CI 0.65-0.97), ASA plus ticagrelor (RR 0.79, 95% CI 0.64-0.97), and ASA plus low-dose rivaroxaban (RR 0.84, 95% CI 0.76-0.93) were more effective than ASA, and equally effective to one another. As compared to ASA, major bleedings occurred more frequently with vitamin K antagonists, rivaroxaban, ASA plus vitamin K antagonists, and ASA plus low-dose rivaroxaban. All regimens were similar to ASA concerning MALE, while ASA plus low-dose rivaroxaban was more effective in preventing ALI (RR 0.67, 95% CI 0.55-0.80). Subgroup analysis in patients undergoing peripheral revascularization revealed that ≥ 3 months after intervention, evidence of benefit regarding clopidogrel, ticagrelor, and ASA plus ticagrelor was lacking, while ASA plus low-dose rivaroxaban was more effective in preventing MACE (RR 0.87, 95% CI 0.78-0.97) and MALE (RR 0.89, 95% CI 0.81-0.97) compared to ASA. ASA plus clopidogrel was not superior to ASA in preventing MACE ≥ 3 months after revascularization. Evidence regarding antithrombotic treatment strategies within 3 months after a peripheral intervention was lacking.

CONCLUSION

Clopidogrel, ticagrelor, ASA plus ticagrelor, and ASA plus low-dose rivaroxaban are superior to ASA monotherapy and equally effective to one another in preventing MACE in PAD. Of these four therapies, only ASA plus low-dose rivaroxaban provides a higher risk of major bleedings. More than 3 months after peripheral vascular intervention, ASA plus low-dose rivaroxaban is superior in preventing MACE and MALE compared to ASA but again at the cost of a higher risk of bleeding, while other treatment regimens show non-superiority. Based on the current evidence, clopidogrel may be considered the antithrombotic therapy of choice for most PAD patients, while in patients who underwent a peripheral vascular intervention, ASA plus low-dose rivaroxaban could be considered for the long-term (> 3 months) prevention of MACE and MALE.

Current Management of Peripheral Artery Disease: Focus on Pharmacotherapy

Peripheral artery disease (PAD) is the occlusion or narrowing of the arteries supplying the lower extremities. Peripheral artery disease has been estimated to affect approximately 240 million people worldwide, approximately 70% of whom are within low- or middle-income countries. Due to the ageing population and diabetes epidemic, the prevalence of PAD is rapidly rising. The symptoms of PAD are heterogeneous and thus a high index of suspicion is needed to prevent delays in diagnosis and treatment. Measurement of ankle brachial pressure index or arterial duplex ultrasound are traditionally used to diagnose PAD. Patients with PAD have a high risk of major adverse cardiovascular events. Early diagnosis and implementation of secondary cardiovascular prevention is therefore critical. This includes therapies to reduce low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, such as statins, ezetimibe and proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors, blood-pressure reducing medications and anti-thrombotic drugs. Treatments to facilitate smoking cessation and control blood sugar if relevant and an exercise programme are also critical in reducing cardiovascular risk. Currently, these treatments are not well implemented. This review summarises the clinical presentation, risk factors and medical management of PAD. Global efforts are needed to reduce the burden from the growing PAD epidemic by implementing best practices and improving outcomes through further research.

Platelet reactivity testing in peripheral artery disease

DISCLAIMER

In an effort to expedite the publication of articles related to the COVID-19 pandemic, AJHP is posting these manuscripts online as soon as possible after acceptance. Accepted manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and copyedited, but are posted online before technical formatting and author proofing. These manuscripts are not the final version of record and will be replaced with the final article (formatted per AJHP style and proofed by the authors) at a later time.

PURPOSE

Oral antiplatelet therapy is routinely used to prevent adverse cardiovascular events in patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD). Several laboratory tests are available to quantify the degree of platelet inhibition following antiplatelet therapy. This article aims to provide a review of the literature surrounding platelet functional testing in patients with PAD receiving oral P2Y12 inhibitors and to offer guidance to clinicians for the use and interpretation of these tests.

SUMMARY

A literature search of PubMed and the Web of Science Core Collection database was conducted. All studies that performed platelet function testing and reported clinical outcomes in patients with PAD were included. Evaluation of the data suggests that, among the available testing strategies, the VerifyNow platelet reactivity unit (PRU) test is the most widely used. Despite numerous investigations attempting to define a laboratory threshold indicating suboptimal response to antiplatelet therapy, controversy exists about which PRU value best correlates with cardiovascular outcomes (ie, mortality, stent thrombosis, etc). In the PAD literature, the most commonly used PRU thresholds are 208 or higher and 235 or higher. Nonetheless, adjusting antiplatelet regimens based on suboptimal P2Y12 reactivity values has yet to be proven useful in reducing the incidence of adverse cardiovascular outcomes. This review examines platelet function testing in patients with PAD and discusses the interpretation and application of these tests when monitoring the safety and efficacy of P2Y12 inhibitors.

CONCLUSION

Although platelet functional tests may be simple to use, clinical trials thus far have failed to show benefit from therapy adjustments based on test results. Clinicians should be cautioned against relying on this test result alone and should instead consider a combination of laboratory, clinical, and patient-specific factors when adjusting P2Y12 inhibitor therapy in clinical practice.

Antiplatelet agents for chronic kidney disease

BACKGROUND

Antiplatelet agents are widely used to prevent cardiovascular events. The risks and benefits of antiplatelet agents may be different in people with chronic kidney disease (CKD) for whom occlusive atherosclerotic events are less prevalent, and bleeding hazards might be increased. This is an update of a review first published in 2013.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the benefits and harms of antiplatelet agents in people with any form of CKD, including those with CKD not receiving renal replacement therapy, patients receiving any form of dialysis, and kidney transplant recipients.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Kidney and Transplant Register of Studies up to 13 July 2021 through contact with the Information Specialist using search terms relevant to this review. Studies in the Register are identified through searches of CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and EMBASE, conference proceedings, the International Clinical Trials Register (ICTRP) Search Portal and ClinicalTrials.gov.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We selected randomised controlled trials of any antiplatelet agents versus placebo or no treatment, or direct head-to-head antiplatelet agent studies in people with CKD. Studies were included if they enrolled participants with CKD, or included people in broader at-risk populations in which data for subgroups with CKD could be disaggregated.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Four authors independently extracted data from primary study reports and any available supplementary information for study population, interventions, outcomes, and risks of bias. Risk ratios (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated from numbers of events and numbers of participants at risk which were extracted from each included study. The reported RRs were extracted where crude event rates were not provided. Data were pooled using the random-effects model. Confidence in the evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 113 studies, enrolling 51,959 participants; 90 studies (40,597 CKD participants) compared an antiplatelet agent with placebo or no treatment, and 29 studies (11,805 CKD participants) directly compared one antiplatelet agent with another. Fifty-six new studies were added to this 2021 update. Seven studies originally excluded from the 2013 review were included, although they had a follow-up lower than two months. Random sequence generation and allocation concealment were at low risk of bias in 16 and 22 studies, respectively. Sixty-four studies reported low-risk methods for blinding of participants and investigators; outcome assessment was blinded in 41 studies. Forty-one studies were at low risk of attrition bias, 50 studies were at low risk of selective reporting bias, and 57 studies were at low risk of other potential sources of bias. Compared to placebo or no treatment, antiplatelet agents probably reduces myocardial infarction (18 studies, 15,289 participants: RR 0.88, 95% CI 0.79 to 0.99, I² = 0%; moderate certainty). Antiplatelet agents has uncertain effects on fatal or nonfatal stroke (12 studies, 10.382 participants: RR 1.01, 95% CI 0.64 to 1.59, I² = 37%; very low certainty) and may have little or no effect on death from any cause (35 studies, 18,241 participants: RR 0.94, 95 % CI 0.84 to 1.06, I² = 14%; low certainty). Antiplatelet therapy probably increases major bleeding in people with CKD and those treated with haemodialysis (HD) (29 studies, 16,194 participants: RR 1.35, 95% CI 1.10 to 1.65, I² = 12%; moderate certainty). In addition, antiplatelet therapy may increase minor bleeding in people with CKD and those treated with HD (21 studies, 13,218 participants: RR 1.55, 95% CI 1.27 to 1.90, I² = 58%; low certainty). Antiplatelet treatment may reduce early dialysis vascular access thrombosis (8 studies, 1525 participants) RR 0.52, 95% CI 0.38 to 0.70; low certainty). Antiplatelet agents may reduce doubling of serum creatinine in CKD (3 studies, 217 participants: RR 0.39, 95% CI 0.17 to 0.86, I² = 8%; low certainty). The treatment effects of antiplatelet agents on stroke, cardiovascular death, kidney failure, kidney transplant graft loss, transplant rejection, creatinine clearance, proteinuria, dialysis access failure, loss of primary unassisted patency, failure to attain suitability for dialysis, need of intervention and cardiovascular hospitalisation were uncertain. Limited data were available for direct head-to-head comparisons of antiplatelet drugs, including prasugrel, ticagrelor, different doses of clopidogrel, abciximab, defibrotide, sarpogrelate and beraprost.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Antiplatelet agents probably reduced myocardial infarction and increased major bleeding, but do not appear to reduce all-cause and cardiovascular death among people with CKD and those treated with dialysis. The treatment effects of antiplatelet agents compared with each other are uncertain.

A Review of Antithrombotic Therapies for Patients with Chronic Peripheral Arterial Disease and after Revascularization

Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) represents a major health issue that significantly impacts patient's survival and quality of life. In addition to limb-related events, patients with PAD have an increased risk of myocardial infarction, stroke, and death. However, compared with coronary and cerebrovascular disease, studies addressing optimal risk reduction modalities including antithrombotic therapies in patients with PAD have been underrepresented in the literature. This publication serves as a narrative review of existing evidence on the effectiveness of antithrombotic therapy in patients with PAD. In patients with chronic stable PAD or post-revascularization, antithrombotic therapies including single or dual antiplatelet agents, anticoagulation, or a combination of these treatments have been shown to reduce cardiovascular and limb events. This narrative review provides a summary of the available literature on the management of patients with PAD, categorized into treatment strategies for chronic, post-endovascular treatment, and post-open surgical revascularization and to discuss the antithrombotic protocol utilized at our institution while providing a rational for our treatment algorithm.

Artificial-Intelligence-Assisted Discovery of Genetic Factors for Precision Medicine of Antiplatelet Therapy in Diabetic Peripheral Artery Disease

An increased risk of cardiovascular events was identified in patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD). Clopidogrel is one of the most widely used antiplatelet medications. However, there are heterogeneous outcomes when clopidogrel is used to prevent cardiovascular events in PAD patients. Here, we use an artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted methodology to identify genetic factors potentially involved in the clopidogrel-resistant mechanism, which is currently unclear. Several discoveries can be pinpointed. Firstly, a high proportion (>50%) of clopidogrel resistance was found among diabetic PAD patients in Taiwan. Interestingly, our result suggests that platelet function test-guided antiplatelet therapy appears to reduce the post-interventional occurrence of major adverse cerebrovascular and cardiac events in diabetic PAD patients. Secondly, AI-assisted genome-wide association study of a single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) database identified a SNP signature composed of 20 SNPs, which are mapped into 9 protein-coding genes (SLC37A2, IQSEC1, WASHC3, PSD3, BTBD7, GLIS3, PRDM11, LRBA1, and CNR1). Finally, analysis of the protein connectivity map revealed that LRBA, GLIS3, BTBD7, IQSEC1, and PSD3 appear to form a protein interaction network. Intriguingly, the genetic factors seem to pinpoint a pathway related to endocytosis and recycling of P2Y12 receptor, which is the drug target of clopidogrel. Our findings reveal that a combination of AI-assisted discovery of SNP signatures and clinical parameters has the potential to develop an ethnic-specific precision medicine for antiplatelet therapy in diabetic PAD patients.

Peripheral Artery Disease as a Risk Factor for Myocardial Infarction

INTRODUCTION

 Atherosclerosis contributes to the underlying pathophysiology for peripheral arterial disease (PAD), coronary artery disease (CAD), and cerebrovascular disease. Several studies have been conducted to demonstrate PAD as a major risk factor for cardiovascular (CV) events, however, the regional data are limited. This study aims to highlight PAD as a major risk factor in CV events in a local setting.

METHODS

 In this longitudinal study, 400 hypertensive patients with a confirmed diagnosis of PAD were enrolled from the outpatient department of the cardiology unit. Diagnosis of PAD was made using the ankle brachial index (ABI). ABI less than 0.9 was labeled as participants with PAD. Another group of 400 without PAD was also enrolled as the control group from the outpatient department of cardiology unit. Patients were followed up for 12 months or for the development of myocardial infarction (MI).

RESULT

 Participants with PAD had a significant increased risk of total MI events with a relative risk (RR) of 1.67 (confidence interval, CI 95%: 1.05-2.66; p-value: 0.02). The RR for fatal MI was 2.62 (CI 95%: 0.94-7.29; p-value: 0.06) compared to the participants without PAD, however, it was not significant.

CONCLUSION

 This study has focused on the risk factors of PAD and has suggested that the patients who have any of the mentioned risk factors should be treated with caution under strict instructions given by doctors. A variety of treatment options is available, but the initial changes should be made in the lifestyle of these patients, making sure the risk factors are being treated.

Dual Pathway of Inhibition and Vascular Protection in Patients with Atherosclerotic Disease

Несмотря на широкое внедрение в клиническую практику современной антитромботической стратегии (моно- или двойной антитромбоцитарной терапии), резидуальный риск неблагоприятных сердечно-сосудистых событий у пациентов с ишемической болезнью сердца (ИБС) и заболеваниями периферических артерий (ЗПА) по-прежнему остается высоким. До настоящего времени двойная антитромбоцитарная терапия является «золотым стандартом» вторичной профилактики при остром коронарном синдроме (ОКС), а монотерапия рекомендована пациентам с симптоматическим течением ЗПА, стабильной ИБС и цереброваскулярной болезнью. Вместе с тем разрыв атеросклеротической бляшки приводит не только к активации тромбоцитов, но также, вследствие экспозиции тканевого фактора, потенцирует образование тромбина. Поэтому терапевтическая стратегия, направленная на одновременное подавление генерации тромбина и активации тромбоцитов и называемая «двойной путь ингибирования», представляется более эффективной, чем известные варианты лечения, связанные с торможением только одного из двух путей. Как показали результаты исследования COMPASS, комбинация 2,5 мг ривароксабана дважды в сутки со 100 мг/сутки аспирина оказалась более эффективной по сравнению с монотерапией 100 мг/сутки аспирина в части снижения риска серьезных сердечно-сосудистых событий, незапланированных госпитализаций и летальности без увеличения количества фатальных и интракраниальных геморрагических осложнений. Преимущества режима двойного ингибирования, апробированного в исследовании COMPASS, были продемонстрированы в популяции пациентов с недавним ОКС, стабильной ИБС и ЗПА, а также после реваскуляризации нижних конечностей. На сегодняшний день ривароксабан является единственным антикоагулянтом, подтвердившим безусловные преимущества в сочетании с антитромбоцитарной терапией в указанных группах пациентов. Комбинированная терапия низкими дозами ривароксабана (2,5 мг/дважды/сутки) и аспирином (100 мг/сутки) уже включена в последние международные рекомендации как вариант вторичной профилактики у пациентов с патологией коронарных и периферических артерий.

Patients with cardiovascular (CV) disease are at high residual risk of CV events (including peripheral ischemic events), even when they receive the current antithrombotic strategies (single/dual antiplatelet therapy). Until now, dual antiplatelet therapy is the standard of care for the secondary prevention in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS), whereas the single antiplatelet therapy, generally with aspirin, is the standard of care for the secondary prevention in stable patients with coronary artery disease (CAD), peripheral artery disease (PAD), or cerebrovascular disease. Meanwhile, atherosclerotic plaque disruption not only induces the platelet activation, but also results in thrombin generation because of tissue factor exposure. Therefore, interrupting both pathways by combining antiplatelet therapy with an anticoagulant (dual pathway inhibition [DPI]), has the potential to be more effective than inhibiting either pathway alone. The COMPASS trial showed that in comparison with aspirin 100 mg, rivaroxaban 2.5 mg twice a day plus aspirin 100 mg reduced the risk of major cardiac events, CV hospitalization, and mortality, without the increase of intracranial or fatal bleedings. The benefit of DPI using the COMPASS regimen was demonstrated in patients with the recent ACS, in chronic CAD and PAD patients, and after the lower extremity revascularization. So far, rivaroxaban is the only anticoagulant, which is effective in combination with antiplatelet therapies in the mentioned groups. The combination of low-dose rivaroxaban (2.5 mg twice daily) and aspirin (100 mg once daily) has been included recently into the latest international recommendations for the secondary prevention in patients with coronary or peripheral artery disease.

The Role for Combined Antithrombotic Therapy With Platelet and Coagulation Inhibition After Lower Extremity Revascularization

Evidence for antithrombotic treatment following lower extremity revascularization (LER) for peripheral artery disease (PAD) is limited, leading to weak and conflicting guideline recommendations and heterogeneous practice patterns. This variability in post-LER antithrombotic treatment raises quality-of-care issues that have long been under-studied. This Viewpoint reviews the most updated guidelines, currently-available evidence, and contemporary data about practice patterns and practitioner opinions in this area. Particular attention is paid to distinctions between antiplatelet therapy, anticoagulant therapy, and combination therapy in light of the recent VOYAGER-PAD (Vascular Outcomes Study of ASA [acetylsalicylic acid] Along with Rivaroxaban in Endovascular or Surgical Limb Revascularization for PAD) trial. The implications of VOYAGER-PAD pertaining to various subgroups of patients undergoing LER are explored. Overall, this Viewpoint argues for consideration of post-LER therapy targeted at both platelet function and the coagulation cascade, though further LER-specific analyses, including expected VOYAGER-PAD sub-analyses, are needed.

Do we have a unified consensus on antithrombotic management of PAD?

Peripheral artery disease (PAD) is one of the most frequent manifestations of atherosclerosis with high rates of morbidity and mortality. Platelets and coagulation are involved in the progression of atherosclerosis and thromboembolic complications. PAD patients have increased prothrombotic potential, which includes platelet hyperaggregability and increased pro-coagulant state. Therefore, antithrombotic treatment is of utmost importance for the prevention of cardiovascular events in this group of patients. Aspirin is the basic antiplatelet drug, but with limited efficacy in PAD. In contrast to coronary artery disease, its effect on the prevention of cardiovascular events in PAD has been limited proven. Particularly in asymptomatic PAD, there is no evidence for risk reduction with aspirin. Clopidogrel and ticagrelor are more effective than aspirin. Clopidogrel is thus an effective alternative to aspirin for prevention of cardiovascular events in symptomatic PAD. In patients who are non-responders to clopidogrel, ticagrelor is indicated. Dual antiplatelet treatment (DAPT) with aspirin and ticagrelor in patients with coronary artery disease and concomitant PAD significantly decreased the rate of major adverse cardiovascular events, including adverse limb events. However, in the CHARISMA Trial, aspirin and clopidogrel were not more effective than aspirin alone and increased bleeding complications. Therefore, DAPT seems effective only in PAD accompanied by coronary artery disease. Anticoagulant treatment for symptomatic PAD with vitamin K antagonists alone or in combination with aspirin is not more effective than single antiplatelet treatment but increases the rate of major bleeding. Low dose rivaroxaban combined with aspirin in PAD patients significantly reduces cardiovascular events, including limb-threatening ischemia and limb amputations. Anticoagulation and antiplatelet treatment after percutaneous or surgical revascularization of PAD improve the patency of treated vessels. Aspirin with or without dipyridamole improved patency of infra-inguinal by-pass grafts at one year. The combination of clopidogrel with aspirin was more effective than aspirin alone in the prevention of prosthetic graft occlusions in patients undergoing below-knee by-pass-grafting. Oral vitamin K antagonists were not more effective than aspirin in the prevention of infra-inguinal by-pass occlusion. The combination of low dose rivaroxaban and aspirin was effective in preventing major adverse cardiovascular events and adverse limb events after infrainguinal endovascular or surgical revascularization in patients with intermittent claudication. However, the data on antithrombotic treatment after revascularization for limb-threatening ischemia is scanty and inconclusive. In conclusion: Antithrombotic treatment of PAD is a cornerstone for the management of these patients. Antiplatelet drugs prevent the initiation and progression of atherosclerosis and are effective also in the prevention of thromboembolic events. Simultaneous use of antiplatelet and anticoagulation drugs is accompanied by an increased risk of bleeding. However, combined treatment with aspirin and low-dose rivaroxaban is more effective than single antithrombotic treatment and safer than full-dose combined treatment.

Medical therapy for cardiovascular and limb-related risk reduction in critical limb ischemia

Critical limb ischemia (CLI) constitutes the most advanced form of peripheral artery disease (PAD) and is characterized by ischemic rest pain, tissue loss and/or gangrene. Optimized medical care and risk factor modification in addition to revascularization could reduce the incidence of cardiovascular events and major adverse limb events, improving patients' quality of life and promising higher survival rates. Adequate adherence to cardioprotective medications, including antithrombotic therapy (e.g., antiplatelets, anticoagulants), cholesterol-lowering agents (e.g., statins, proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors), angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs), and smoking cessation should be strongly encouraged for patients with CLI. This review examines these guideline-recommended therapies in terms of cardiovascular and limb-related risk reduction in patients with CLI.

Efficacy and Safety of Antiplatelet Therapies in Symptomatic Peripheral Artery Disease: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Clopidogrel monotherapy is guideline-recommended in symptomatic peripheral artery disease (PAD). The advent of new antithrombotic strategies prompts an updated analysis of available evidence on antiplatelet therapy for PAD.

METHODS

We searched MEDLINE, Embase and CENTRAL through January 2019 for randomised controlled trials and observational studies comparing antiplatelet therapies as monotherapy, dual therapy, or combination with anticoagulants. Efficacy (major adverse cardiovascular events, acute or chronic limb ischaemia, vascular amputation, peripheral revascularisation) and safety (all-cause mortality and overall bleeding) outcomes were evaluated via Bayesian network meta-analyses.

RESULTS

We analysed 26 randomised controlled trials. Clopidogrel (hazard ratio, HR, 0.78; 95% credible interval [CrI] 0.65-0.93) and ticagrelor (HR 0.80; 95% CrI 0.65-0.98) significantly reduced major adverse cardiovascular events risk compared with aspirin. No significant difference was observed for dual antiplatelet therapy with clopidogrel and aspirin. Vorapaxar significantly reduced limb ischaemia and revascularisation compared with placebo, while dual antiplatelet therapy with clopidogrel and aspirin showed a trend for reduced risk of amputation compared with aspirin (risk ratio 0.68; 95% CrI 0.43-1.04). For all-cause mortality, picotamide, vorapaxar, dipyridamole with aspirin, and ticlopidine showed a significantly lower risk of all-cause mortality vs aspirin. Clopidogrel and ticagrelor showed similar overall bleeding risk vs aspirin, while dual antiplatelet therapy with clopidogrel and aspirin significantly increased bleeding risk.

CONCLUSION

This updated network meta-analysis confirms that clopidogrel significantly decreases the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events compared with aspirin, without increasing bleeding risk. Clopidogrel should remain a mainstay of PAD treatment, at least in patients at higher bleeding risk.

Polyvascular disease: A narrative review of current evidence and a consideration of the role of antithrombotic therapy

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Polyvascular disease (PVD) affects approximately 20% of patients with atherosclerosis and is a strong independent risk factor for ischemic outcomes. However, guidelines do not address screening or treatment for PVD, and there have been no PVD-specific trials. We reviewed subgroup analyses of large randomized controlled trials of more intense antithrombotic therapy to determine whether increased intensity of therapy improved ischemic outcomes in patients with PVD.

METHODS

MEDLINE, MEDLINE in-Process, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library were queried for randomized controlled trials larger than 5000 patients evaluating secondary prevention therapies in patients with coronary artery disease or lower extremity peripheral artery disease.

RESULTS

Thirteen trials were included ranging in size from 7243 to 27,395 patients. In 9 trials (CHARISMA, TRA 2°P-TIMI 50, PEGASUS-TIMI 54, VOYAGER PAD, TRACER, EUCLID, TRILOGY ACS, PLATO, and COMPASS), patients in the PVD subgroup treated with increased-intensity antithrombotic therapy had similar or greater relative risk reductions for ischemic events in comparison with the general trial cohorts. In four trials (DAPT, THEMIS, APPRAISE-2, and ATLAS ACS 2 TIMI 51), the PVD subgroup had an increased hazard of ischemic events with increased-intensity therapy compared with the general trial cohorts.

CONCLUSIONS

More intense antithrombotic therapy in patients with PVD was associated with a similar relative risk reduction for ischemic events compared with patients without PVD. Therefore, patients with PVD benefit from a larger absolute risk reduction because of their higher baseline risk. Future trials in patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease should intentionally include PVD patients to adequately assess treatment options for this under-studied, under-treated population.

Chronic mesenteric ischemia: Clinical practice guidelines from the Society for Vascular Surgery

BACKGROUND

Chronic mesenteric ischemia (CMI) results from the inability to achieve adequate postprandial intestinal blood flow, usually from atherosclerotic occlusive disease at the origins of the mesenteric vessels. Patients typically present with postprandial pain, food fear, and weight loss, although they can present with acute mesenteric ischemia and bowel infarction. The diagnosis requires a combination of the appropriate clinical symptoms and significant mesenteric artery occlusive disease, although it is often delayed given the spectrum of gastrointestinal disorders associated with abdominal pain and weight loss. The treatment goals include relieving the presenting symptoms, preventing progression to acute mesenteric ischemia, and improving overall quality of life. These practice guidelines were developed to provide the best possible evidence for the diagnosis and treatment of patients with CMI from atherosclerosis.

METHODS

The Society for Vascular Surgery established a committee composed of vascular surgeons and individuals experienced with evidence-based reviews. The committee focused on six specific areas, including the diagnostic evaluation, indications for treatment, choice of treatment, perioperative evaluation, endovascular/open revascularization, and surveillance/remediation. A formal systematic review was performed by the evidence team to identify the optimal technique for revascularization. Specific practice recommendations were developed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation system based on review of literature, the strength of the data, and consensus.

RESULTS

Patients with symptoms consistent with CMI should undergo an expedited workup, including a computed tomography arteriogram, to exclude other potential causes. The diagnosis is supported by significant arterial occlusive disease in the mesenteric vessels, particularly the superior mesenteric artery. Treatment requires revascularization with the primary target being the superior mesenteric artery. Endovascular revascularization with a balloon-expandable covered intraluminal stent is the recommended initial treatment with open repair reserved for select younger patients and those who are not endovascular candidates. Long-term follow-up and surveillance are recommended after revascularization and for asymptomatic patients with severe mesenteric occlusive disease. Patient with recurrent symptoms after revascularization owing to recurrent stenoses should be treated with an endovascular-first approach, similar to the de novo lesion.

CONCLUSIONS

These practice guidelines were developed based on the best available evidence. They should help to optimize the care of patients with CMI. Multiple areas for future research were identified.

Peripheral arterial disease has a strong impact on cardiovascular outcome in patients with acute coronary syndromes: from the START Antiplatelet registry

BACKGROUND

Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) was reported to increase the risk of new cardiovascular events in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS). However, most of the evidence comes from randomized clinical trials. We aimed to assess the impact of PAD on cardiovascular outcome and treatment decisions in ACS patients in a current real-life setting.

METHODS

START-ANTIPLATELET is a multicenter registry enrolling ACS patient. Baseline clinical characteristics and treatment at discharge were recorded and follow-up was repeated at 6-months and 1-year. PAD was defined as intermittent claudication and/or previous revascularization.

RESULTS

Among 1442 patients enrolled, 103 (7.1%) had PAD. PAD patients were older (71.8 ± 10.6vs66.2 ± 12.6 yrs., p < 0.0001), more frequently hypertensive (90.3vs68.6%, p< 0.0001), hypercholesterolemic (66vs52%, p= 0.037), diabetic (51.5vs24%, p= 0.0001), obese (28.2vs19.3%, p= 0.029) and with previous TIA (7.8vs2.8%, p= 0.005) or stroke (11.7vs3.1%, p< 0.0001). Clinical presentation and acute treatment were similar in non-PAD and PAD patients, but the latter were discharged significantly less frequently on dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) (68.9vs85%, p= 0.005). After a median follow-up time of 11.1 months, major cardio/cerebrovascular event-free survival [MACCE, including cardiovascular death, MI, TIA and stroke, target-vessel revascularization (TVR) and major arterial ischemic events] was significantly shorter (9.0vs11.2 months, p= 0.02; HR 3.2, 2.4-8.4) in PAD patients and net adverse cardiovascular events (NACE = MACCE plus major hemorrhages) were significantly more frequent (19.1%vs10.5%, p = 0.049).

CONCLUSIONS

PAD identifies a subgroup of ACS patients at significantly increased cardiovascular risk, but these patients tend to be undertreated. Patients admitted for ACS should be screened for PAD and optimal medical therapy at discharge should be implemented.

Antithrombotic strategies for patients with coronary and lower extremity peripheral artery diseases: a narrative review

INTRODUCTION

Patients with coexisting coronary artery disease (CAD) and peripheral artery disease (PAD) present a very high rate of cardiovascular (CV) morbidity and mortality. Several studies have demonstrated that different regimens of antithrombotic therapies may reduce adverse CV events in patients with CAD or PAD. However, data on optimal antithrombotic combination to use in these very high-risk patients are scarce and conflicting.

AREAS COVERED

This paper reviews current data on antithrombotic therapies tested in CAD patients with concomitant lower extremity PAD.

EXPERT OPINION

The antithrombotic response in lower extremity PAD patients varies based on the atherosclerotic burden. For patients with isolated stable PAD may be sufficient a less potent P2Y12 inhibitor as clopidogrel, whereas patients with lower extremity PAD and documented CAD benefit from a more intense and prolonged antithrombotic treatment.

Asia-Pacific Consensus Statement on the Management of Peripheral Artery Disease: A Report from the Asian Pacific Society of Atherosclerosis and Vascular Disease Asia-Pacific Peripheral Artery Disease Consensus Statement Project Committee

BACKGROUND

Peripheral artery disease (PAD) is the most underdiagnosed, underestimated and undertreated of the atherosclerotic vascular diseases despite its poor prognosis. There may be racial or contextual differences in the Asia-Pacific region as to epidemiology, availability of diagnostic and therapeutic modalities, and even patient treatment response. The Asian Pacific Society of Atherosclerosis and Vascular Diseases (APSAVD) thus coordinated the development of an Asia-Pacific Consensus Statement (APCS) on the Management of PAD.

OBJECTIVES

The APSAVD aimed to accomplish the following: 1) determine the applicability of the 2016 AHA/ACC guidelines on the Management of Patients with Lower Extremity Peripheral Artery Disease to the Asia-Pacific region; 2) review Asia-Pacific literature; and 3) increase the awareness of PAD.

METHODOLOGY

A Steering Committee was organized to oversee development of the APCS, appoint a Technical Working Group (TWG) and Consensus Panel (CP). The TWG appraised the relevance of the 2016 AHA/ACC PAD Guideline and proposed recommendations which were reviewed by the CP using a modified Delphi technique.

RESULTS

A total of 91 recommendations were generated covering history and physical examination, diagnosis, and treatment of PAD-3 new recommendations, 31 adaptations and 57 adopted statements. This Asia-Pacific Consensus Statement on the Management of PAD constitutes the first for the Asia-Pacific Region. It is intended for use by health practitioners involved in preventing, diagnosing and treating patients with PAD and ultimately the patients and their families themselves.

Diagnosis and Management of Peripheral Artery Diseases

Распространенность заболеваний периферических артерий (ЗПА) во всем мире достигает порядка 200 миллионов человек. Самым частым клиническим проявлением ЗПА является перемежающая хромота, возникающая вследствие недостаточного кровоснабжения пораженной конечности. В настоящем обзоре литературы обобщены и систематизированы последние достижения в области диагностики и лечения пациентов с перемежающей хромотой. Тщательный сбор анамнеза и физикальное обследование являются первоочередными мероприятиями для установления предварительного диагноза и направлены на дифференциацию сосудистых и нейрогенных причин перемежающей хромоты. Лодыжечно-плечевой индекс относится к наиболее часто используемым методам скрининга и диагностики ЗПА. Основу лечения составляют четыре взаимодополняющих подхода: немедикаментозное и лекарственное лечение для купирования симптомов хронической ишемии, фармакотерапия для вторичной профилактики сердечно-сосудистых осложнений, открытая или эндоваскулярная реваскуляризация для увеличения дистанции безболевой ходьбы. Недавнее исследование COMPASS продемонстрировало преимущества комбинированного применения 2,5 мг ривароксабана дважды в день и аспирина в части снижения уровня неблагоприятных сердечно-сосудистых событий, при этом отмечался более высокий риск геморрагических осложнений. На сегодняшний день цилостазол является единственным препаратом, обладающим доказанной терапевтической эффективностью в отношении перемежающей хромоты. Программы лечебной физкультуры под наблюдением врача либо в домашних условиях способствуют улучшению коллатерального кровообращения и увеличивают дистанцию ходьбы без боли. Назначение высоких доз статинов и антитромбоцитарных препаратов абсолютно обосновано всем пациентам с ЗПА. Ингибиторы ангиотензин-превращающего фермента обеспечивают дополнительное снижение кардиоваскулярных рисков, в особенности у пациентов с сахарным диабетом и артериальной гипертензией.

The prevalence of peripheral artery disease (PAD) worldwide reaches about 200 million people. The most frequent clinical manifestation of PAD is intermittent claudication, which occurs due to insufficient blood supply to the affected limb. This literature review summarizes and systematizes recent advances in the diagnosis and treatment of patients with intermittent claudication.Thorough case history collection and physical examination are the primary measures for making a preliminary diagnosis, which is aimed at differentiating the vascular and neurogenic causes of intermittent claudication. The ankle-shoulder index is one of the most commonly used methods for screening and diagnosing PAD. The basis of treatment consists of four complementary approaches: non-pharmacological and pharmacological treatment for the relief of symptoms of chronic ischemia, pharmacotherapy for the secondary prevention of cardiovascular complications, open or endovascular revascularization to increase the distance of pain-free walking. A recent COMPASS study demonstrated the benefits of combining 2.5 mg of rivaroxaban twice daily with aspirin in reducing adverse cardiovascular events, however there was a higher risk of hemorrhagic complications. Today, cilostazol is the only drug with proven therapeutic effectiveness against intermittent claudication. Physical therapy programs under the supervision of a doctor or at home help to improve collateral blood circulation and increase the walking distance without pain. The administration of high doses of statins and antiplatelet drugs is absolutely justified in all patients with PAD. Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors provide an additional reduction in cardiovascular risks, especially in patients with diabetes and hypertension.

Practical Importance of COMPASS Trial Results for Vascular Surgeons

В настоящем обзоре литературы проведен анализ актуальной информации, затрагивающей вопросы антитромботической терапии пациентов с заболеваниями периферических артерий (ЗПА). Особое внимание уделено практическому применению результатов программы COMPASS. В исследовании были продемонстрированы преимущества комбинированного применения 2,5 мг ривароксабана дважды в день и аспирина в сравнении с монотерапией аспирином в части снижения уровня сердечно-сосудистых и цереброваскулярных событий и неблагоприятных исходов со стороны нижних конечностей у пациентов со стабильным течением ишемической болезни сердца и/или ЗПА. Вместе с тем антитромботическая терапия ривароксабаном и аспирином была связана с более высоким риском геморрагических осложнений (нефатальных и невнутричерепных). Независимыми предикторами неблагоприятных событий со стороны нижних конечностей явились предсуществующие критическая ишемия нижних конечностей (боль в покое, язва или гангрена), ампутация нижней конечности или стопы, открытая реваскуляризация или стентирование периферических артерий в анамнезе. Усиление антитромботической терапии ривароксабаном в дополнение к аспирину можно рассматривать у пациентов с ЗПА, входящих в группу высокого риска ишемических осложнений и ампутации, на фоне низкого риска кровотечения. При использовании комбинированной терапии ривароксабаном и аспирином в каждом конкретном случае требуется регулярная оценка баланса пользы и риска. Результаты продолжающегося исследования VOYAGER PAD позволят определить эффективность применения комбинированной антитромботической терапии после реваскуляризации периферических артерий.

In this literature review, there is analyzed the relevant information concerning antithrombotic therapy in patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD). Special attention is paid to the practical use of the results of the COMPASS program. The study demonstrated the benefits of the combined use of 2.5 mg of rivaroxaban twice daily and aspirin in comparison with aspirin monotherapy in terms of reducing the level of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events and adverse outcomes in lowerextremities in patients with stable coronary heart disease and/or PAD. However, antithrombotic therapy with rivaroxaban and aspirin was associated with a higher risk of hemorrhagic complications (non-fatal and non-intracranial). Independent predictors of adverse events in lower extremities were pre-existing critical ischemia of lower extremities (pain at rest, ulcer or gangrene), amputation of the lower extremity or foot, open revascularization or stenting of peripheral arteries in the patient’s case history. Strengthening the antithrombotic therapy with rivaroxaban in addition to aspirin can be considered in patients with PAD, who are at high risk of ischemic complications and amputation, on the background of low risk of bleeding. When using the combination therapy with rivaroxaban and aspirin, regular assessment of the balance of benefits and risks is required in each case. The results of the ongoing VOYAGER PAD study will determine the effectiveness of combined antithrombotic therapy after revascularization of peripheral arteries.

Ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in patients undergoing implantation of paclitaxel-eluting stent in the femoropopliteal district: A randomized pilot study using frequency-domain optical coherence tomography

OBJECTIVES

Aim of this study was to evaluate different response in platelet reactivity and vessel healing using high-resolution frequency-domain optical coherence tomography (FD-OCT) in patients with femoropopliteal artery disease treated with ZILVER PTX drug eluting stents (DES), and randomly assigned to clopidogrel or ticagrelor for 12 months.

BACKGROUND

The optimal antithrombotic regimen for long-term management of patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD) after revascularization is poorly defined and often extrapolated from trials performed on patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.

METHODS

In this single center randomized trial 40 patients with femoropopliteal artery disease treated with ZILVER PTX DES stents, were randomized to Ticagrelor (T) + Aspirin for 3 months, subsequently continuing Ticagrelor alone for another 9 months or Clopidogrel (C) + Aspirin for 3 months, subsequently continuing Clopidogrel alone for 9 months. Platelet reactivity via the P2Y12 pathway was evaluated at baseline and at 3 months follow-up, angiographic and FD-OCT follow-up along the entire stented segment was performed at 12 months.

RESULTS

No significant difference between T and C group was found concerning net percentage volume obstruction (29.7% ± 17.6% vs. 31.2% ± 10.7%; p = 0.78). FD-OCT at 12 months showed a high percentage of uncovered stent struts in both groups: 24.2% ± 32.8% in the T group vs 15.3% ± 15.8% in the C group (p = 0.4). Mean values of platelet reactivity units (PRU) at 3 month follow-up were 81 ± 72 in the T group and 200 ± 61 in the C group (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Significantly higher platelet reactivity remains in patients treated with clopidogrel as compared to ticagrelor 3 months after PTA and stent implantation. Ticagrelor does not reduce neointimal proliferation in patients treated with DES in the femoropopliteal district as compared with clopidogrel. A large amount of uncovered stent struts at 12-month follow-up was found in these patients regardless of the antiplatelet treatment assumed.

The Role of Clopidogrel in 2020: A Reappraisal

Antiplatelet therapy is the mainstay of treatment and secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease (CVD), including acute coronary syndrome (ACS), transient ischemic attack (TIA) or minor stroke, and peripheral artery disease (PAD). The P2Y12 inhibitors, of which clopidogrel was the first, play an integral role in antiplatelet therapy and therefore in the treatment and secondary prevention of CVD. This review discusses the available evidence concerning antiplatelet therapy in patients with CVD, with a focus on the role of clopidogrel. In combination with aspirin, clopidogrel is often used as part of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) for the secondary prevention of ACS. Although newer, more potent P2Y12 inhibitors (prasugrel and ticagrelor) show a greater reduction in ischemic risk compared with clopidogrel in randomized trials of ACS patients, these newer P2Y12 inhibitors are often associated with an increased risk of bleeding. Deescalation of DAPT by switching from prasugrel or ticagrelor to clopidogrel may be required in some patients with ACS. Furthermore, real-world studies of ACS patients have not confirmed the benefits of the newer P2Y12 inhibitors over clopidogrel. In patients with very high-risk TIA or stroke, short-term DAPT with clopidogrel plus aspirin for 21-28 days, followed by clopidogrel monotherapy for up to 90 days, is recommended. Clopidogrel monotherapy may also be used in patients with symptomatic PAD. In conclusion, there is strong evidence supporting the use of clopidogrel antiplatelet therapy in several clinical settings, which emphasizes the importance of this medication in clinical practice.

COMPASS for Vascular Surgeons: Practical Considerations

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To suggest a practical approach for the application of data from the Cardiovascular Outcomes for People Using Anticoagulation Strategies (COMPASS) trial in patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD).

RECENT FINDINGS

The COMPASS trial showed that low-dose rivaroxaban 2.5 mg twice daily plus daily aspirin was superior to aspirin alone in reducing major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events, and major adverse limb events among patients with stable atherosclerotic vascular disease, including those with PAD. The risk for major bleeding, however, was higher with rivaroxaban plus aspirin. Critical limb ischemia at baseline (rest pain, ulcer, or gangrene), previous limb or foot amputation, or a history of peripheral revascularization surgery or stenting were independently associated with increased major adverse limb events within the trial.

SUMMARY

Intensification of antithrombotic therapy with low-dose rivaroxaban plus aspirin should be considered in low bleeding risk PAD patients who are at increased risk for ischemic and/or limb events. A practical approach for clinicians is presented to help incorporate COMPASS data into practice.

Incidence, Characteristics, and Outcomes of Myocardial Infarction in Patients With Peripheral Artery Disease: Insights From the EUCLID Trial

Importance

Patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD) are at high risk for myocardial infarction (MI).

Objective

To characterize the incidence and types of MI in a PAD population, identify factors associated with MI, and determine the association of MI with cardiovascular mortality and acute limb ischemia.

Design, Setting, and Participants

The Study Comparing Cardiovascular Effects of Ticagrelor and Clopidogrel in Patients With Peripheral Artery Disease (EUCLID) was a double-blind randomized clinical trial conducted at 811 sites in 28 countries that randomized 13 885 patients with symptomatic PAD to monotherapy with ticagrelor or clopidogrel. Participants had an ankle-brachial index (ABI) of 0.80 or less or previous lower extremity revascularization. Median follow-up was 30 months. For these analyses, patients were evaluated for MI occurrence during follow-up irrespective of treatment. Data were analyzed from June 2017 to September 2018.

Main Outcomes and Measures

An adjudication clinical events committee classified MI as type 1 (spontaneous), type 2 (secondary), type 3 (sudden cardiac death), type 4a (less than 48 hours after percutaneous coronary intervention), type 4b (definite stent thrombosis), or type 5 (less than 72 hours after coronary artery bypass graft). A multivariate regression model was developed by stepwise selection to identify factors associated with MI, and a time-dependent multivariate Cox regression analysis was performed to determine the association of MI with cardiovascular death and acute limb ischemia requiring hospitalization.

Results

Of the 13 885 patients included in this analysis, 9997 (72.0%) were male, and the median (interquartile range) age was 66 (60-73) years. Myocardial infarction occurred in 683 patients (4.9%; 2.4 events per 100 patient-years) during a median follow-up of 30 months. Patients experiencing MI were older (median [interquartile range] age, 69 [62-75] vs 66 [60-72] years), more likely to have diabetes (349 of 683 [51.1%] vs 4996 of 13 202 [37.8%]) or a previous lower extremity revascularization (466 of 683 [68.2%] vs 7409 of 13 202 [56.1%]), and had a lower ABI (if included by ABI) compared with censored patients. Of the 683 patients with MI during follow-up, the most common MI type was type 1 (405 [59.3%]), followed by type 2 (236 [34.6%]), type 4a (14 [2.0%]), type 3 (12 [1.8%]), type 4b (11 [1.6%]), and type 5 (5 [0.7%]). Postrandomization MI was independently associated with cardiovascular death (adjusted hazard ratio, 9.0; 95% CI, 7.3-11.2; P < .001) and acute limb ischemia requiring hospitalization (adjusted hazard ratio, 2.5; 95% CI, 1.3-5.0; P = .008).

Conclusions and Relevance

Approximately 5% of patients with symptomatic PAD had an MI during a median follow-up of 30 months. Type 1 MI (spontaneous) was the most common MI type; however, one-third of MIs were type 2 MI (secondary). More research is needed to identify therapies to reduce the risk of MI in patients with PAD and to improve management of type 2 MI.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01732822.

Evidence-Based Medical Management of Peripheral Artery Disease

Peripheral artery disease is an atherosclerotic disease of the lower extremities associated with high cardiovascular mortality. Management of this condition may include lifestyle modifications, medical management, endovascular repair, or surgery. The medical approach to peripheral artery disease is multifaceted and includes cholesterol reduction, antiplatelet therapy, anticoagulation, peripheral vasodilators, blood pressure management, exercise therapy, and smoking cessation. Adherence to this regimen can reduce limb-related complications like critical limb ischemia and amputation, as well as systemic complications of atherosclerosis like stroke and myocardial infarction. Relative to coronary artery disease, peripheral artery disease is an undertreated condition. In this article, we explore the evidence behind medical therapies for the management of peripheral artery disease.

Tackling Elevated Risk in PAD: Focus on Antithrombotic and Lipid Therapy for PAD

The PAD population is at increased risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and major adverse limb events (MALE). Risk factor modification, symptom control, antithrombotic, and lipid therapies are the mainstays of PAD medical therapy. Recent data has challenged prior recommendations regarding the optimal secondary prevention strategies in PAD. PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To review clinical evidence from large randomized controlled trials showing the benefit of antithrombotic and lipid therapy in the PAD population. RECENT FINDINGS: The COMPASS trial challenged prior recommendations regarding anticoagulation in PAD. Among the PAD subgroup, rivaroxaban 2.5 mg plus aspirin reduced MACE (HR 0.72, 95% CI 0.57-0.90, p = 0.0047), MALE (HR 0.54, 95% CI 0.35-0.82, p = 0.0037), and major amputation (HR 0.30, 95% CI 0.11-0.80, p = 0.011) compared with aspirin monotherapy. The THEMIS trial showed a 55% risk reduction for MALE with ticagrelor DAPT compared with aspirin monotherapy (HR 0.45, 95% CI 0.23-0.86). The FOURIER trial revealed that lowering LDL cholesterol below current targets with a PCSK9 inhibitor reduced MACE (HR 0.73, 95% CI 0.59-0.91, p = 0.0040) and MALE (HR 0.43, 95% CI 0.19-0.99, p = 0.042) in subjects with symptomatic PAD. Recent high-quality evidence shows the benefit of antiplatelet therapy, anticoagulation therapy, and lipid therapy in reducing MACE and MALE in PAD. Despite these findings, implementation remains a challenge and focus should now shift towards adopting evidence-based recommendations in clinical practice.

Umbrella review and meta-analysis of antiplatelet therapy for peripheral artery disease

BACKGROUND

The literature on antiplatelet therapy for peripheral artery disease has historically been summarized inconsistently, leading to conflict between international guidelines. An umbrella review and meta-analysis was performed to summarize the literature, allow assessment of competing safety risks and clinical benefits, and identify weak areas for future research.

METHODS

MEDLINE, Embase, DARE, PROSPERO and Cochrane databases were searched from inception until January 2019. All meta-analyses of antiplatelet therapy in peripheral artery disease were included. Quality was assessed using AMSTAR scores, and GRADE analysis was used to quantify the strength of evidence. Data were pooled using random-effects models.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight meta-analyses were included. Thirty-three clinical outcomes and 41 antiplatelet comparisons in 72 181 patients were analysed. High-quality evidence showed that antiplatelet monotherapy reduced non-fatal strokes (3 (95 per cent c.i. 0 to 6) fewer per 1000 patients), In symptomatic patients, it reduced cardiovascular deaths (8 (0 to 16) fewer per 1000 patients), but increased the risk of major bleeding (7 (3 to 14) more events per 1000). In asymptomatic patients, monotherapy reduced non-fatal strokes (5 (0 to 8) fewer per 1000), but had no other clinical benefit. Dual antiplatelet therapy caused more major bleeding after intervention than monotherapy (37 (8 to 102) more events per 1000), with very low-quality evidence of improved endovascular patency (risk ratio 4·00, 95 per cent c.i. 0·91 to 17·68).

CONCLUSION

Antiplatelet monotherapy has minimal clinical benefit for asymptomatic peripheral artery disease, and limited benefit for symptomatic disease, with a clear risk of major bleeding. There is a lack of evidence to guide antiplatelet prescribing after peripheral endovascular intervention.

Antithrombotic Therapy After Revascularization in Patients With Peripheral Arterial Disease: What Is Here, What Is Next

OBJECTIVE

The optimal antithrombotic regimen in peripheral arterial disease (PAD) is not known, leading to significant variations in antithrombotic treatment protocols in randomized trials and clinical practice. In device trials, antithrombotic regimens in patients receiving peripheral vascular interventions have not been clearly reported on. This review summarizes and discusses the most recent evidence on this topic to provide a potential guide to clinical practice.

METHODS

A search of the literature was done for publications that reported outcomes of major PAD device trials. Reported outcomes and various antithrombotic regimens were studied.

RESULTS

Use of antithrombotic therapy varied significantly between various device trials. Reporting of antithrombotic regimens at the time of follow-up is lacking.

CONCLUSION

Outcome data on optimal antithrombotic regimens are presently lacking largely due to the significant heterogeneity and underreporting of antithrombotic regimens at follow-up among prior clinical trials. Standardization and reporting of precise antithrombotic regimens at various points of follow-up in device trials of patients with PAD should be attempted so as to minimize differences in treatment patterns when evaluating new devices.

Antithrombotics in stable peripheral artery disease

Patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD) are at high risk for ischemic cardiovascular complications. While single antiplatelet therapy (SAPT), predominantly aspirin, has long been the standard antithrombotic treatment in stable PAD, there have now been greater than 40,000 PAD patients randomized to varying antiplatelet and/or anticoagulant regimens. In this review, we provide a summary of the current evidence for antithrombotics in stable PAD, focusing on the rates of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), major adverse limb events (MALE), and major bleeding. SAPT has a limited role in the treatment of asymptomatic PAD, particularly in the absence of concomitant coronary artery disease. In symptomatic PAD, SAPT is effective in preventing MACE, though treatment with a thienopyridine appears marginally superior to aspirin. Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) suggests benefit over SAPT in reducing MACE and MALE, though studies to date are not conclusive and/or are associated with excess major bleeding. Combining moderate to high intensity vitamin K antagonists with antiplatelet therapy does not reduce MACE or MALE and increases life-threatening bleeding. Rivaroxaban 2.5 mg BID in addition to aspirin reduces the incidence of both MACE and MALE as compared to aspirin alone, without increasing life-threatening bleeding. This regimen is associated with a reduced severity of MALE when it does occur. Comparisons across antithrombotic trials in PAD are challenging given the heterogeneity of patient populations and the differing assessment of outcomes. The vascular medicine practitioner can reduce ischemic cardiac and limb events, as well as minimize life-threatening bleeding, by choosing the optimal antithrombotic regimen in their PAD patients.

Association between Peripheral Artery Disease and Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome: Findings from the Gulf COAST Registry

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the association between peripheral artery disease (PAD) and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) in the Arabian Gulf.

METHODS

Data from 4,044 consecutive patients diagnosed with ACS admitted to 29 hospitals in four Arabian Gulf countries from January 2012 to January 2013 were analyzed. PAD was defined as any of the following: claudication, amputation for arterial vascular insufficiency, vascular reconstruction, bypass surgery, or percutaneous intervention in the extremities, documented aortic aneurysm or an ankle brachial index of <0.8 in any of the legs. MACE included stroke/transient ischemic attack (TIA), myocardial infarction (MI), all-cause mortality, and readmissions for cardiac reasons diagnosed between hospital admission and at 1-year post discharge. Analyses were performed using univariate and multivariate statistical techniques.

RESULTS

The overall mean age of the cohort was 60 ± 13 years and 66% (n = 2,686) were males. A total of 3.3% (n = 132) of the patients had PAD. Patients with PAD were more likely to be associated with smoking, prior MI, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and stroke/TIA. At the 1-year follow-up, patients with PAD were significantly more likely to have MACE (adjusted OR [aOR], 2.07; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.41-3.06; p< 0.001). The higher rates of events were also observed across all MACE components; stroke/TIA (aOR, 3.22; 95% CI: 1.80-5.75; p< 0.001), MI (aOR, 2.15; 95% CI: 1.29-3.59; p =0.003), all-cause mortality (aOR, 2.21; 95% CI: 1.33-3.69; p =0.002), and readmissions for cardiac reasons (aOR, 1.83; 95% CI: 1.24-2.70; p =0.003).

CONCLUSIONS

PAD was significantly associated with MACE in ACS patients in the Arabian Gulf.

Anti-platelet and anti-coagulant therapy in peripheral arterial disease prior to surgical intervention

OBJECTIVE

Peripheral artery disease is a major clinical co-morbidity that can significantly affect quality of life, especially in the presence of diabetes mellitus and older age. The focus of this literature review is on medical management, through anti-platelet and anti-coagulation, of peripheral artery disease prior to undergoing surgical or endovascular management.

METHOD

Extensive electronic literature search performed in four major databases (PubMed, SCOPUD, Embase and Ovid) to identify the published randomized and non-randomized studies that compared and discussed the management of peripheral artery disease with different anti-thrombotic agents.

RESULTS

A total of 17 studies were identified to meet the inclusion criteria of this review. Among them, 4 were systematic review and meta-analyses, 1 was observational study and 12 were randomized controlled trials. The reported outcomes in each study are summarized and reported separately within this review.

CONCLUSION

Peripheral artery disease is a complex and multifactorial clinical condition. The use of dual anti-platelets, such as aspirin and clopidogrel, are the key in preventing major cardiovascular events as well as stroke and death. Utilization of anti-coagulation such as direct oral anti-coagulants' as additional parameters for the prevention of disease progression, is paramount. Eventually, the choice of either dual-antiplatelet therapy or combined anti-coagulation with anti-platelets should be carefully considered, particularly following the most recent published debatable studies.

Oral Antiplatelet Therapy for Secondary Prevention of Acute Coronary Syndrome

Patients surviving an acute coronary syndrome (ACS) remain at increased risk of ischemic events long term. This paper reviews current evidence and guidelines for oral antiplatelet therapy for secondary prevention following ACS, with respect to decreased risk of ischemic events versus bleeding risk according to individual patient characteristics and risk factors. Specifically, data are reviewed from clinical studies of clopidogrel, prasugrel, ticagrelor and vorapaxar, as well as the results of systematic reviews and meta-analyses looking at the benefits and risks of oral antiplatelet therapy, and the relative merits of shorter versus longer duration of dual antiplatelet therapy, in different patient groups.

Antiplatelet therapy for peripheral artery disease

Atherosclerotic cardiovascular (CV) disease represents one of leading cause of mortality and morbidity in Western countries. An increased risk of CV events was identified in patients with peripheral arterial diseases (PADs), which include all arterial diseases, other than coronary arteries and the aorta. In particular, lower extremity artery disease (LEAD) and/or carotid artery disease present growing incidence in general population and a consequent increase in mortality and morbidity. Medical treatment, including antiplatelet therapy, is a cornerstone in management of these patients, even when they are treated with endovascular or surgical procedures. Despite their clinical relevance, data on optimal antiplatelet treatment in this clinical setting are lacking and often derived from clinical trials on coronary artery disease and by subgroups analysis. The purpose of this review is to examine the available data from registries, randomized trials and meta-analysis on antiplatelet treatment in patients with LEAD and carotid stenosis with the aim to provide evidence to support clinical decision making.

Antithrombotic therapies for elderly patients: handling problems originating from their comorbidities

Compared with younger people, elderly people have higher risks for both thrombosis and bleeding. Furthermore, comorbidities frequently found in elderly patients complicate the management of antithrombotic therapy. Thus, when treating these patients, physicians often find it difficult to incorporate the principles of evidence-based medicine and must determine the best treatment option for each patient. Recently, in the fields of cerebrovascular and cardiovascular diseases, researchers have been rapidly accumulating new data regarding antithrombotic therapy, particularly in the areas of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) and dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT). However, information related to elderly patients receiving antithrombotic therapy is still relatively limited. There are also more and more publications describing how antithrombotic therapy affects the pathogenesis of non-thrombotic diseases. Similarly, the number of reports concerning adherence to this therapy has been increasing lately. However, no review articles detailing these findings have yet been published. In actual clinical practice, antithrombotic therapy in the elderly is not a treatment strategy targeted to only one organ or disease. Rather, it requires an interdisciplinary approach aimed at maintaining the overall health of the patient. Thus, to assist physicians’ decision-making processes for elderly patients, an overview of recent findings related to the evidence regarding concomitant medications, the secondary benefits of antithrombotic therapy for patients with comorbidities, and evidence regarding medication adherence is provided.

Ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in patients with symptomatic peripheral artery disease and prior coronary artery disease: Insights from the EUCLID trial

Patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD) are at heightened risk of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. We sought to evaluate the risk of concomitant coronary artery disease (CAD) in patients with symptomatic PAD versus PAD without diagnosed CAD, and whether ticagrelor was superior to clopidogrel in reducing that risk. The EUCLID trial randomized 13,885 patients with PAD to antithrombotic monotherapy with ticagrelor or clopidogrel. CAD was defined as prior myocardial infarction (MI), percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), or coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery. Median follow-up was 30 months. Among 4032 (29%) patients with PAD and CAD, 63% had prior MI, 54% prior PCI, and 38% prior CABG. After adjustment for baseline characteristics, patients with PAD and CAD had significantly higher rates of the primary endpoint (cardiovascular death/MI/stroke, 15.3% vs 8.9%, hazard ratio (HR) 1.50, 95% CI: 1.13-1.99; p=0.005), but no statistically significant increase in acute limb ischemia (HR 1.28, 95% CI: 0.57-2.85; p=0.55) or major bleeding (HR 1.10, 95% CI: 0.49-2.48; p=0.81) versus PAD without CAD. Among patients with PAD and CAD, there was no differential treatment effect between ticagrelor versus clopidogrel for the primary efficacy endpoint (HR 1.02, 95% CI: 0.87-1.19; p=0.84), acute limb ischemia (HR 1.03, 95% CI: 0.63-1.69; p=0.89), or major bleeding (HR 1.06, 95% CI: 0.66-1.69; p=0.81). There was a statistically significant interaction between prior coronary stent placement and study treatment ( p=0.03) with a numerical reduction in the primary efficacy endpoint with ticagrelor versus clopidogrel (13.8% vs 16.8%, HR 0.82, 95% CI: 0.65-1.03; p=0.09). Patients with PAD and prior CAD had higher composite rates of cardiovascular death, MI, and ischemic stroke versus PAD without diagnosed CAD. There were no significant differences between ticagrelor and clopidogrel in cardiovascular events or major bleeding. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01732822.

Incidence, timing, and type of first and recurrent ischemic events in patients with and without peripheral artery disease after an acute coronary syndrome

BACKGROUND

Patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD) are known to have an increased risk of ischemic cardiovascular events. However, the influence of concomitant PAD on first and subsequent recurrent ischemic events after an acute coronary syndrome (ACS) remains poorly characterized.

METHODS

We analyzed the combined data set from 4 randomized trials (PLATO, APPRAISE-2, TRA-CER, and TRILOGY ACS) in ACS for a follow-up length of 1 year. Using multivariable regression, we examined the association between PAD and major adverse cardiovascular events, a composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, and stroke. Among patients with a nonfatal first event, we evaluated the incidence and type of a second recurrent event.

RESULTS

A total of 4,098 of 48,094 (8.5%) post-ACS patients had a history of PAD. The unadjusted frequency of major adverse cardiovascular events was 2-fold higher in patients with PAD (14.3% vs 7.5%) over a median (25th-75th) follow-up of 353 (223-365) days with an adjusted hazard ratio of 1.63 (95% CI: 1.48-1.78; P < .001). The frequency of recurrent ischemic events among those patients with a first, nonfatal event was higher among those with PAD (40.0% vs 27.7%). The relative frequency of each event type (cardiovascular death, noncardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or stroke) within first and subsequent ischemic events was similar regardless of PAD status at baseline.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with PAD have a significantly higher risk of first and recurrent ischemic events in the post-ACS setting. These findings highlight the opportunity for improved treatments in patients with PAD who experience an ACS.

Ticagrelor for the prevention of ischemic events in patients with prior myocardial infarction and peripheral artery disease

INTRODUCTION

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the main cause of death in the world. Coronary artery disease (CAD) is the most common form of CVD presentation, but the prevalence of peripheral artery disease (PAD) is increasing. Patients with polyvascular disease comprise a very high-risk population that has been infrequently studied. Areas covered: The authors review the current evidence of the efficacy and safety of ticagrelor in the setting of acute coronary syndrome and stable patients post-MI with and without PAD and summarize its pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and regulatory issues. Expert opinion: Randomized studies showed that ticagrelor is superior to clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes, and is superior to placebo in the chronic phase (>1 year) post-myocardial infarction. Sub-analyses of these studies suggest that patients with myocardial infarction and PAD, compared to patients without these characteristics, may have greater benefit with ticagrelor. Nonetheless, the global evidence about the role of ticagrelor in patients with myocardial infarction and PAD remains relatively sparse, and a prospective randomized trial testing this hypothesis would be necessary to provide more definite data regarding the efficacy and safety of ticagrelor in this very high-risk population.

Peripheral Artery Disease and Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Outcomes: A Report From the Society of Thoracic Surgeons/American College of Cardiology Transcatheter Therapy Registry

BACKGROUND

Peripheral artery disease (PAD) is associated with increased cardiovascular mortality, and PAD risk factors overlap with those for aortic stenosis. The prevalence and outcomes associated with PAD in a population undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are unknown.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Using the Society of Thoracic Surgeons/Transcatheter Valve Therapy Registry linked to Medicare claims data, we identified patients ≥65 years old undergoing TAVR from 2011 to 2015. We calculated hazard ratios for 1-year adverse outcomes, including mortality, readmission, and bleeding, for patients with PAD compared with those without, adjusting for baseline characteristics and postprocedure medications. Analyses were performed separately by access site (transfemoral and nontransfemoral). Of 19 660 patients undergoing transfemoral TAVR, 4810 (24.5%) had PAD; 3730 (47.9%) of 7780 patients undergoing nontransfemoral TAVR had PAD. In both groups, patients with PAD were significantly more likely to have coronary and carotid artery diseases. At 1-year follow-up, patients with PAD undergoing TAVR via transfemoral access had a higher incidence of death (16.8% versus 14.4%; adjusted hazard ratio, 1.14; P=0.01), readmission (45.5% versus 42.1%; hazard ratio, 1.11; P<0.001), and bleeding (23.1% versus 19.7%; hazard ratio, 1.18; P<0.001) compared with patients without PAD. Patients with PAD undergoing TAVR via nontransfemoral access did not have significantly higher rates of 1-year mortality or readmission compared with patients without PAD.

CONCLUSIONS

PAD is common among patients undergoing commercial TAVR via transfemoral and nontransfemoral access. Among patients undergoing transfemoral TAVR, PAD is associated with a higher incidence of 1-year adverse outcomes compared with absence of PAD.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01737528.