The future of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol lowering therapy: An end to statin exceptionalism?

Evolution and Outcomes of Premature Coronary Artery Disease

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The purpose of this review is to explore the evolution and outcomes of premature coronary artery disease (PCAD) while reviewing strategies for effective screening of those at high risk for developing this disease.

RECENT FINDINGS

Premature coronary artery disease (PCAD) affects a population of patients not typically identified as high risk by current risk stratification guidelines or traditional risk calculation tools. Not only does PCAD represent a large proportion of overall cardiovascular disease, it also afflicts a population in which the rate of mortality from cardiovascular disease has plateaued despite an overall declining population-wide cardiovascular mortality rate. There is ample opportunity for behavioral change strategies, screening tools, adapted imaging modalities, and precision pharmacotherapies to be more precisely targeted toward those at highest risk for premature coronary artery disease. Premature coronary artery disease (PCAD) is pervasive and not frequently represented within contemporary risk calculation models. Providers should pursue proactive screening and aggressive risk factor modification and deploy appropriate preventative therapies in caring for younger populations.

Statin intolerance in heterozygous familial hypercolesterolemia with cardiovascular disease: After PCSK-9 antibodies what else?

Background

Familial hypercholesterolemia is the elective clinical condition that deserves the maximal personalisation in lipid-lowering therapy, especially in the presence of statin intolerance. Proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors represent a promising approach to lower low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol.

Methods

We enrolled 18 patients (mean age 62 ± 8 years, 72% men) affected by heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia and cardiovascular disease, with a history of statin intolerance assigned to PCSK9 inhibitors. Six patients were also on LDL apheresis. Associated Lp(a)-hyperlipoproteinemia (defined as >60 mg/dl) was observed in two out of 18 subjects. PCSK9 inhibitor injectable monoclonal antibodies were administered, every 2 weeks, on top of patient therapy for 12 ± 4 weeks (evolocumab in 15 subjects, alirocumab in three subjects).

Results

After 3 months (12 ± 4 weeks) of therapy, a decrease in total cholesterol (–35%), LDL cholesterol (–51%) and Lp(a) levels (–20%) was observed. Five out of 18 patients reached LDL cholesterol levels of <70 mg/dl, seven showed LDL cholesterol values between 71 and 100 mg/dl, and six out of 18 still had LDL cholesterol levels above 100 mg/dl. Among the six patients with LDL cholesterol levels >100 mg/dl, three were already on LDL apheresis before the PCSK9 inhibitor treatment, while three were referred to LDL apheresis treatment. Adverse events were reported in two out of 18 patients on evolocumab: one presented with flu-like syndrome and the other reported episodes of mild difficulty in maintaining concentration.

Conclusions

PCSK9 inhibitors represent a novel therapeutic tool for patients with familial hypercholesterolemia who are intolerant to statins. However, more data are needed before cleaning up the old therapeutic armamentarium, such as LDL apheresis, which is likely to preserve its valuable role also in the new lipid-lowering era.

Lipid-Lowering Therapy and Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) Goal Achievement in High-Cardiovascular-Risk Patients in Fuzhou, China

PURPOSE

This study aims to analyze the treatment patterns and goal attainment of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) among patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) and diabetes mellitus (DM) in the real-world setting in Fuzhou, China.

METHODS

Patients aged ≥20 years with a valid LDL-C measurement (index date) in 2016 were selected from National Healthcare Big Data in Fuzhou, China. Patients were stratified into mutually exclusive cardiovascular risk categories: ASCVD (including recent acute coronary syndrome [ACS], chronic coronary heart disease [CHD], stroke, and peripheral arterial disease [PAD]), and DM alone (without ASCVD). Lipid-modifying medication and LDL-C attainment at the index date were assessed.

RESULTS

A total of 21 989 patients met the inclusion criteria, including 17 320 (78.8%) with ASCVD and 4669 (21.2%) with DM alone; 47.7% of patients received current statin therapy in the overall cohort (53.5% in ASCVD, 26.5% for DM); 20.5% ASCVD population achieved LDL-C target with the highest in patients with recent ACS (33.8%), followed by chronic CHD (21.2%), PAD (20.9%), and ischemic stroke (17.3%); 49.0% of patients with DM achieved LDL-C target. Higher LDL-C attainment was observed in high-intensity statin and a combination of statin and nonstatin groups. Atorvastatin was the most commonly used statin with the highest LDL-C attainment, followed by rosuvastatin.

CONCLUSION

Compared with previous studies in China, our study found a relatively low statin use and LDL-C target attainment, but higher than similar studies in Europe. Guidelines should be well complied and more prescription of high-intensity statin or statin and nonstatin combination should be advocated.

PCSK9: From Basic Science Discoveries to Clinical Trials

Unknown 15 years ago, PCSK9 (proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9) is now common parlance among scientists and clinicians interested in prevention and treatment of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. What makes this story so special is not its recent discovery nor the fact that it uncovered previously unknown biology but rather that these important scientific insights have been translated into an effective medical therapy in record time. Indeed, the translation of this discovery to novel therapeutic serves as one of the best examples of how genetic insights can be leveraged into intelligent target drug discovery. The PCSK9 saga is unfolding quickly but is far from complete. Here, we review major scientific understandings as they relate to the role of PCSK9 in lipoprotein metabolism and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and the impact that therapies designed to inhibit its action are having in the clinical setting.

Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in a global cohort of 57,885 statin-treated patients

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

There is an inconsistency between international guidelines on lipid-lowering treatment regarding whether to pursue LDL-C treatment targets or to focus on the intensity of treatment. While either approach is attractive, there is no recent global data on actual LDL-C values, treatment targets attained, and the intensity of treatment in statin-treated patients. We aimed to determine and compare the extent of treatment target attainment globally using standardized data collection.

METHODS

Analyses were based on the Dyslipidemia International Study (DYSIS), a cross-sectional study documenting statin-treated outpatients throughout 30 countries worldwide (across Europe, the Middle East, Canada, Africa, and Asia). Patients were classified as being at very high, high, or non-high cardiovascular risk based on the 2011 European Society of Cardiology (ESC)/European Atherosclerosis Society (EAS) guidelines.

RESULTS

Data were available for a total of 57,885 patients with a median LDL-C value of 98.2 mg/dl (IQR: 76.6, 125.7 mg/dl). Overall, only 26.8% of patients were documented to have attained their risk-based target LDL-C level. Of the 76% of patients who were classified as being at very high risk, only 21.7% attained their LDL-C goal. Globally, the median distance to target was 33.0 mg/dl, ranging from 18.8 to 42.1 mg/dl across countries. We calculated that a further LDL-C reduction of just 10 mg/dl would result in an 11% increase in the proportion of very-high-risk and high-risk patients attaining their target level (9% for non-high risk patients).

CONCLUSIONS

In spite of statin therapy, LDL-C values were high, with a substantial distance to target that was even more pronounced in (very) high risk patients. These results call for the optimization of existing treatment strategies and a collaborative effort to improve the impact of treatment guidance on clinical practice.