Association of weight loss with cardiovascular or all-cause mortality in patients with heart failure: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

A consensus has not been reached on the association between weight loss and survival outcomes in patients with heart failure (HF). This meta-analysis aimed to assess the association of weight loss with cardiovascular or all-cause mortality in patients with HF.

METHODS

Two authors independently searched the articles indexed in the PubMed and Embase databases up to May 7, 2023. Post hoc analysis of randomized controlled trials or observational studies that reported the utility of weight loss in predicting cardiovascular or all-cause mortality in patients with HF were included.

RESULTS

Thirteen studies reporting on 12 articles involving 26,164 patients with HF were included. A comparison of weight loss with stable weight showed that the pooled adjusted hazard ratio (HR) for all-cause mortality was 1.75 (95% confidence intervals [CI] 1.43-2.14). Subgroup analysis revealed that weight loss was associated with an increased risk of all-cause mortality, irrespective of whether patients were overweight/obese (HR 1.76; 95% CI 1.41-2.20) or not (HR 1.90; 95% CI 1.14-3.14). The pooled adjusted HR of cardiovascular mortality was 1.64 (95% CI 1.18-2.28) for patients with weight loss compared to those without.

CONCLUSIONS

Weight loss is associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular and all-cause mortality in patients with HF. Assessing weight changes can provide prognostic information for patients with HF.

Predictors Associated With Prognosis of Patients on the Waiting List for Heart Transplantation

Aim    To identify predictors associated with the prognosis of patients on the heart transplant waiting list (HTWL) corresponding to UNOS class 2.Material and methods    A HTWL database for 2010-2021 was retrospectively evaluated. The study included patients (n=162) who at the time of inclusion into the HTWL met UNOS class 2 and reached the endpoint of death, heart transplantation (HT), or exclusion from the HTWL due to an improvement of their condition. Mean age was 48±13 (from 11 to 67) years, 80% (n=130) were men, and body weight index was 24.9±4.4 kg/m2. Patients were divided into two groups: group 1 (n=131), patients who left the HTWL (improvement of CHF functional class) and patients who maintained the UNOS class 2 until HT; group 2 (n=31), patients who transferred from UNOS class 2 to UNOS class 1B/1A or died while on the HTWL.Results    Patients of group 2 had lower systolic BP compared to patients of group 1 (100±17, mm Hg vs. 107±17 mm Hg, respectively, p=0.03). In group 1 compared to group 2, there was a higher proportion of patients with obesity, 29 (22%) vs. 1 (3%) (p=0.02). Laboratory blood tests: absolute lymphocyte count (2.0±0.7×109/L and 1.6±0.9×109/L, p=0.03), serum albumin (42±5 g/l and 40±6 g/l, p=0.03), red cell distribution width (RDW) (16±4% and 18±4%, p=0.01); sodium concentration (139±4 and 136±4 mmol/l, p=0.009). Patients from group 2 had a higher pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) (4.0±2.4 Wood units vs. 3.2±1.4 Wood units, p=0.01) at baseline. A predictive model (p<0.001) was developed to determine a probability of prognosis in HTWL. The model sensitivity was 75% and the specificity was 67%. High PVR was a predictor that worsened the prognosis in HTWL; higher serum concentrations of sodium and albumin increased the probability of a favorable outcome in HTWL.Conclusion    During the period of waiting for HT, 19% of patients that met UNOS class 2 experienced deterioration of their condition (transitioned to UNOS 1) or died. The most important predictors for a better outcome in patients on HTWL who meet UNOS class 2 were higher serum levels of sodium and albumin and low pulmonary vascular resistance.

Obesity in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction with and without diabetes: risk factor or innocent bystander?

AIMS

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is a condition that commonly coexists with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and obesity. Whether the obesity-related survival benefit generally observed in HFpEF extends to individuals with concomitant T2DM is unclear. This study sought to examine the prognostic role of overweight and obesity in a large cohort of HFpEF with and without T2DM.

METHODS AND RESULTS

This large-scale cohort study included patients with HFpEF enrolled between 2010 and 2020. The relationship between body mass index (BMI), T2DM, and survival was assessed. A total of 6744 individuals with HFpEF were included, of which 1702 (25%) had T2DM. Patients with T2DM had higher BMI values (29.4 kg/m2 vs. 27.1 kg/m2, P < 0.001), higher N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide values (864 mg/dL vs. 724 mg/dL, P < 0.001), and a higher prevalence of numerous risk factors/comorbidities than those without T2DM. During a median follow-up time of 47 months (Q1-Q3: 20-80), 2014 (30%) patients died. Patients with T2DM had a higher incidence of fatal events compared with those without T2DM, with a mortality rate of 39.2% and 26.7%, respectively (P < 0.001). In the overall cohort, using the BMI category 22.5-24.9 kg/m2 as the reference group, the unadjusted hazard ratio (HR) for all-cause death was increased in patients with BMI <22.5 kg/m2 [HR: 1.27 (confidence interval 1.09-1.48), P = 0.003] and decreased in BMI categories ≥25 kg/m2. After multivariate adjustment, BMI remained significantly inversely associated with survival in non-T2DM, whereas survival was unaltered at a wide range of BMI in patients with T2DM.

CONCLUSION

Among the various phenotypes of HFpEF, the T2DM phenotype is specifically associated with a greater disease burden. Higher BMI is linked to improved survival in HFpEF overall, while this effect neutralises in patients with concomitant T2DM. Advising BMI-based weight targets and weight loss may be pursued with different intensity in the management of HFpEF, particularly in the presence of T2DM.

Investigating the paradox of increasing obesity and declining heart disease mortality in the United States: Age-period-cohort model

Background

Obesity as a risk factor of heart disease (HD) is confirmed through observational, laboratory, and intervention studies. However, it cannot explain why HD declines, but obesity increases in the United States in recent decades. This study attempted to understand this paradox.

Methods

Annual data of national HD mortality (1999–2018) were derived from Wide-Ranging Online Data for Epidemiologic Research, biannual obesity data (1999–2016) from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, and smoking data (1965–1990) were from the National Health Interview Survey. Age-period-cohort method was used to decompose HD mortality into age, period, and cohort effects, and to estimate age-cohort adjusted mortality rates. To explain the paradox, age-cohort adjusted rates were associated with obesity rates to verify the positive obesity-HD relationship, while smoking rates were associated with cohort effects to explain the current declines in HD mortality.

Results

During 1999–2018, the prevalence of obesity increased while the crude HD mortality rate declined for both sex and all races. After controlling for the curvilinear age effect and consistent declining cohort effect, the age-cohort adjusted HD mortality sustained stable in 1999–2007 and increased thereafter. The age-cohort adjusted rate in 1999–2018 (per 100,000) increased from 189.31 to 238.56 for males, 67.23 to 90.28 for females, 115.54 to 157.39 for White, 246.40 to 292.59 for Black, 79.79 to 101.40 for Hispanics, and 49.95 to 62.86 for Asian. The age-cohort adjusted HD mortality rates were positively associated with obesity rates (r = 0.68 for males, 0.91 for females, 0.89 for White, and 0.69 for Hispanic, p < 0.05), but not significant for Black and Asian. Further, during 1965–1990, the estimated cohort effect showed a decline in HD risk and was positively associated with smoking rates (r = 0.98 for both sex, 0.99 for White, and 0.98 for Black, p < 0.01).

Conclusion

Study findings reveal potential increase of HD risk and support the positive relationship between obesity and HD risk. Declines in HD mortality in the past two decades are primarily due to tobacco use reduction and this protective effect was entangled in the mortality rates as cohort effect.

Associations of body mass index with mortality in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction patients with ischemic versus non-ischemic etiology

Background

Obesity could paradoxically improve prognosis in patients with heart failure (HF), termed the “obesity paradox.” Whether HF etiology could modify the “obesity paradox” is still controversial. In the present study, we aimed to assess the relationship between obesity and death in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) with non-ischemic versus ischemic etiologies.

Methods

We analyzed 3,360 HFpEF patients from the TOPCAT (Treatment of Preserved Cardiac Function Heart Failure with an Aldosterone Antagonist) trial. Cox regression models were used to assess the association of obesity assessed by body mass index (BMI) with short-term and long-term death risk.

Results

Overweight and obesity were associated with a lower risk of long-term all-cause death in patients with non-ischemic HFpEF, even in those with class III obesity (adjusted HR: 0.61, 95% CI 0.38–0.97). However, in the ischemic subgroup, as obesity advanced, this paradoxical relationship was gradually attenuated and disappeared in class III obesity (adjusted HR: 0.93, 95% CI 0.56–1.57). Restricted cubic spline analyses confirmed the differential relationship of baseline BMI with risk of long-term death with a BMI higher than 30 kg/m2 in non-ischemic versus ischemic HFpEF. In the short-term follow-up, the beneficial effects of overweight and obesity on survival were consistently observed in all the BMI categories, with the nadirs of all-cause death risk at class III obesity category both in non-ischemic and ischemic subgroups.

Conclusion

“Obesity paradox” was evident both in non-ischemic and ischemic HFpEF during short-term follow-up, even in those with class III obesity. However, the beneficial effect of class III obesity disappeared during long-term follow-up in ischemic HFpEF.

Clinical Trial Registration

[https://clinicaltrials.gov], identifier [NCT00094302].

Impact of body size on platelet function in patients with acute coronary syndrome on dual antiplatelet therapy

INTRODUCTION

Patients undergoing acute percutaneous coronary intervention receive dual antiplatelet therapy for secondary prevention. Recurrent myocardial infarction or bleedings are possibly due to under- or overdosing of antiplatelet therapy in relation to body size.

METHODS

We correlated residual platelet aggregation with body mass index, body surface area, lean body mass and blood volume in 220 patients on prasugrel (n = 121) or ticagrelor (n = 99).

RESULTS

Platelet aggregation outside the recommended window was recorded in 85 patients, but not correlated with any of the body indices.

CONCLUSION

Body size does not affect platelet response to prasugrel or ticagrelor at the guideline-recommended fixed dosages.

The Obesity Paradox in Chronic Heart Disease and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

Obesity in recent years has become an epidemic. A high body mass index (BMI) is one of today's most crucial population health indicators. BMI does not directly quantify body fat but correlates well with easier body fat measurements. Like smoking, obesity impacts multiple organ systems and is a major modifiable risk factor for countless diseases. Despite this, reports have emerged that obesity positively impacts the prognosis of patients with chronic illnesses such as chronic heart failure (CHF) and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), a phenomenon known as the Obesity Paradox. This article attempts to explain and summarize this phenomenon.

As it stands, two theories explain this paradox. The muscle mass hypothesis states that obese patients are better adapted to tide through acute exacerbations due to increased reserve because of greater muscle mass. The other theory focuses on brown adipose tissue and its anti-inflammatory effects on the body.

We performed a literature review on research articles published in English from 1983 to the present in the following databases - PubMed, Elsevier, and Google Scholar. The following search strings and Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) terms were used: "Obesity," "Heart Failure," "COPD," and "Cardio-Respiratory Fitness." In this review, we looked at the obesity paradox in Heart Failure and COPD. We summarized the current literature on the Obesity Paradox and reviewed its relationship with Cardio-Respiratory Fitness.

Obesity paradox and heart failure

BACKGROUND

There is scientific consensus that obesity increases the risk of cardiovascular diseases (CVD), including heart failure (HF). However, in CVD, many studies observed greater survival in overweight or class 1 obesity individuals. This counterintuitive observation was termed "obesity paradox" (OP).

OBJECTIVE AND METHODS

This article is a narrative overview of the relationship between OP and CVD, particularly HF. The sources used were MEDLINE/PubMed, CINAHL, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library, from 2001 to 31 May 2020, exception for a 1983 work of historical importance. Studies reporting association and prognostic impact of obesity in HF and the impact of body composition on cardiac structure and myocardial function in obesity were also included in this review. In addition, we examined references from the retrieved articles and explored several related websites. Ultimately, we chose 79 relevant documents. Fifty-three were specifically focused on OP and HF.

RESULTS

In this review, we made a summary of the evidence coming from a series of studies investigating OP. Many of these studies do not take into consideration or underestimate some of the more important morpho-functional variables of patients suffering from HF: among these, body composition and visceral adiposity, sarcopenic obesity, muscle fitness (MF), and cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF). A high body mass index (BMI) represents a risk factor for HF, but it also seems to exert a protective effect under certain circumstances. Fat distribution, lean mass, and cardio fitness could play an essential role in determining the observed differences in the HF population.

CONCLUSION

BMI does not distinguish between the metabolically healthy and metabolically unhealthy obesity. The obesity impact on morbidity and premature mortality can be underestimated and, therefore, may lead to incorrect clinical courses.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level V, Narrative review.

Effect of Obesity on Response to Spironolactone in Patients With Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction

Obesity is common in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Whether obesity modifies the response to spironolactone in patients with HFpEF remains unclear. We aimed to investigate the effect of obesity, defined by body mass index (BMI) and waist circumference (WC), on response to spironolactone in patients with HFpEF enrolled in Treatment of Preserved Cardiac Function Heart Failure with an Aldosterone Antagonist trial. This was a post-hoc, exploratory analysis of the Americas cohort of Treatment of Preserved Cardiac Function Heart Failure with an Aldosterone Antagonist trial. BMI≥30 kg/m2 was used to define the obese group and WC≥102 cm in men and ≥88 cm in women were defined as high WC. In separate analyses, BMI and WC were treated as continuous variables. The effect of spironolactone versus placebo on outcomes was calculated by BMI and WC using Cox proportional hazard models. Obese patients were younger and had more co-morbidities. In multivariate analysis, spironolactone use was associated with a significant reduction in the primary end point, compared with placebo in obese [hazard ratio (HR = 0.618, 95% CI 0.460 to 0.831, p = 0.001), but not in nonobese subjects (HR = 0.946, 95% CI 0.623 to 1.437, p = 0.796; p for interaction = 0.056). There was a linear association between continuous BMI and the effect of spironolactone, with the effect becoming significant at 33kg/m². Similar results were obtained for the WC-based analysis. In conclusion, use of spironolactone in obese patients with HFpEF was associated with a decreased risk of the primary end point, cardiovascular death and HF hospitalizations, compared with placebo. Further prospective randomized studies in obese subjects are required.

Nutrition as Treatment Modality in Heart Failure

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review aims to discuss recent evidence and controversies regarding nutrition as a treatment modality for heart failure (HF) patients.

RECENT FINDINGS

Adequate nutrition is known to promote health-related quality of life by addressing malnutrition and promoting optimal functioning among older adults and has an established role in the prevention of HF; however, evidence is limited on the effects of nutrition as a treatment modality in HF. While guidance of sodium restriction to address fluid overload is an ongoing debate among experts, evidence from case studies and small clinical trials suggest a positive impact of plant-based and Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH) dietary patterns on HF-related pathophysiology, quality of life, hospital admissions, and mortality. More clinical trials are needed to establish an evidence base to support dietary management strategies for patients with HF. Clinical and Translational Science Alliances (CTSAs) may provide infrastructure to overcome enrollment barriers.