Management of Acute Coronary Syndromes in Older People: Comprehensive Review and Multidisciplinary Practice-Based Recommendations

Managing health care for older adults aged 75 years and older can pose unique challenges stemming from age-related physiological differences and comorbidities, along with elevated risk of delirium, frailty, disability, and polypharmacy. This review is aimed at providing a comprehensive analysis of the management of acute coronary syndromes (ACS) in older patients, a demographic substantially underrepresented in major clinical trials. Because older patients often exhibit atypical ACS symptoms, a nuanced diagnostic and risk stratification approach is necessary. We aim to address diagnostic challenges for older populations and highlight the diminished sensitivity of traditional symptoms with age, and the importance of biomarkers and imaging techniques tailored for older patients. Additionally, we review the efficacy and safety of pharmacological agents for ACS management in older people, emphasizing the need for a personalized and shared decision-making approach to treatment. This review also explores revascularization strategies, considering the implications of invasive procedures in older people, and weighing the potential benefits against the heightened procedural risks, particularly with surgical revascularization techniques. We explore the perioperative management of older patients experiencing myocardial infarction in the setting of noncardiac surgeries, including preoperative risk stratification and postoperative care considerations. Furthermore, we highlight the critical role of a multidisciplinary approach involving cardiologists, geriatricians, general and internal medicine physicians, primary care physicians, and allied health, to ensure a holistic care pathway in this patient cohort.

Role of Invasive Strategy for Non-ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction in Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) have traditionally been excluded from randomized trials. We aimed to compare percutaneous coronary intervention versus conservative management, and early intervention (EI; within 24 hours of admission) versus delayed intervention (DI; after 24 to 72 hours of admission) in patients with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) and concomitant CKD. An electronic literature search was performed to search for studies comparing invasive management to conservative management or EI versus DI in patients with NSTEMI with CKD. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality; secondary outcomes were acute kidney injury (AKI) or dialysis, major bleeding, and recurrent MI. Hazard ratios (HRs) for the primary outcome and odds ratios for secondary outcomes were pooled in random-effects meta-analyses. Eleven studies (140,544 patients) were analyzed. Invasive management was associated with lower mortality than conservative management (HR 0.62, 95% confidence interval 0.57 to 0.67, p <0.001, I2 = 47%), with consistent benefit across all CKD stages, except CKD 5. There was no significant mortality difference between EI and DI, but subgroup analyses showed significant benefit for EI in stage 1 to 2 CKD (HR 0.75, 95% confidence interval 0.58 to 0.97, p = 0.03, I2 = 0%), with no significant difference in stage 3 and 4 to 5 CKD. Invasive strategy was associated with higher odds of AKI or dialysis and major bleeding, but lower odds of recurrent MI compared with conservative management. In conclusion, in patients with NSTEMI and CKD, an invasive strategy is associated with significant mortality benefit over conservative management in most patients with CKD, but at the expense of higher risk of AKI and bleeding. EI appears to benefit those with early stages of CKD. Trial Registration: PROSPERO CRD42023405491.

Defining Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Complexity and Risk: An Analysis of the United Kingdom BCIS Database 2006-2016

OBJECTIVES

The authors used the BCIS (British Cardiovascular Intervention Society) database to define the factors associated with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) procedural complexity.

BACKGROUND

Complex high-risk indicated percutaneous coronary intervention (CHIP-PCI) is an emerging concept that is poorly defined.

METHODS

The BCIS (British Cardiovascular Intervention Society) database was used to study all PCI procedures in the United Kingdom 2006-2016. A multiple logistic regression model was developed to identify variables associated with in-hospital major adverse cardiac or cerebrovascular events (MACCE) and to construct a CHIP score. The cumulative effect of this score on patient outcomes was examined.

RESULTS

A total of 313,054 patients were included. Seven patient factors (age ≥80 years, female sex, previous stroke, previous myocardial infarction, peripheral vascular disease, ejection fraction <30%, and chronic renal disease) and 6 procedural factors (rotational atherectomy, left main PCI, 3-vessel PCI, dual arterial access, left ventricular mechanical support, and total lesion length >60 mm) were associated with increased in-hospital MACCE and defined as CHIP factors. The mean CHIP score/case for all PCIs increased significantly from 1.06 ± 1.32 in 2006 to 1.49 ± 1.58 in 2016 (P < 0.001 for trend). A CHIP score of 5 or more was present in 2.5% of procedures in 2006 increasing to 5.3% in 2016 (P < 0.001 for trend). Overall in-hospital MACCE was 0.6% when the CHIP score was 0 compared with 1.2% with any CHIP factor present (P < 0.001). As the CHIP score increased, an exponential increase in-hospital MACCE was observed. The cumulative MACCE for procedures associated with a CHIP score 4+ or above was 3.2%, and for a CHIP score 5+ was 4.4%. All other adverse clinical outcomes were more likely as the CHIP score increased.

CONCLUSIONS

Seven patient factors and 6 procedural factors were associated with adverse in-hospital MACCE and defined as CHIP factors. Use of a CHIP score might be a future target for risk modification.

Impact of renal dysfunction and acute kidney injury on outcome in elderly patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention

BACKGROUND

Chronic kidney disease is common in patients admitted with acute coronary syndrome and its prevalence dramatically increases with age. Understanding the determinants of adverse outcomes in this extremely high-risk population may be useful for the development of specific treatment strategies and planning of secondary prevention modalities.

AIM

The aim of this study was to assess the impact of baseline renal function and acute kidney injury on one-year outcome of elderly patients with acute coronary syndrome treated with percutaneous coronary intervention.

METHODS

Patients aged 75 years and older with acute coronary syndrome undergoing successful percutaneous coronary intervention were selected among those enrolled in three Italian multicentre studies. Based on the baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) calculated using the Cockcroft-Gault formula ([(140-age) × body weight × 0.85 if female]/(72 × serum creatinine)* 1.73 m2 of body surface area), patients were classified as having none or mild (eGFR ≥60 ml/min/1.73 m2), moderate (eGFR 30-59 ml/min/1.73 m2) or severe (eGFR <30 ml/min/1.73 m2) renal dysfunction. Acute kidney injury was defined according to the Acute Kidney Injury Network classification. All-cause and cardiovascular mortality, non-fatal myocardial infarction, rehospitalisation for cardiovascular causes, stroke and type 2, 3 and 5 Bleeding Academic Research Consortium bleedings were analysed up to 12 months.

RESULTS

A total of 1904 patients were included. Of these, 57% had moderate and 11% severe renal dysfunction. At 12 months, patients with renal dysfunction had higher rates (P < 0.001) of all-cause (4.5%, 7.5% and 17.8% in patients with none or mild, moderate and severe renal dysfunction, respectively) and cardiovascular mortality (2.8%, 5.2% and 10.2%, respectively). After multivariable adjustment, severe renal dysfunction was associated with a higher risk of all-cause (hazard ratio (HR) 2.86, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.52-5.37, P = 0.001) and cardiovascular death (HR 3.11, 95% CI 1.41-6.83, P = 0.005), whereas non-fatal events were unaffected. Acute kidney injury incidence was significantly higher in ST-elevation myocardial infarction versus non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome patients (11.7% vs. 7.8%, P = 0.036) and in those with reduced baseline renal function (P < 0.001), and it was associated with increased mortality independently from baseline renal function and clinical presentation.

CONCLUSIONS

Baseline renal dysfunction is highly prevalent and is associated with higher mortality in elderly acute coronary syndrome patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. Acute kidney injury occurs more frequently among ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients and those with pre-existing renal dysfunction and is independently associated with one-year mortality.

Apo A1/Apo B ratio and acute coronary syndrome among peritoneal dialysis patients

BACKGROUND

Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is prevalent in continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) patients. However, the association between the apoprotein profile and ACS is not well known. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the relationship between apoproteins and ACS in CAPD patients.

METHODS

Eighty-one CAPD patients were included in this retrospective study. The primary endpoint was ACS. Predictors were baseline apoprotein levels, particularly the ratio of apoprotein A1 (Apo A1)/apoprotein B (Apo B). Cox regression was used to determine the relationship between Apo A1/Apo B and ACS.

RESULTS

During follow-up, 34 (41.98%) CAPD patients experienced an ACS. ACS patients had higher levels of total cholesterol (p = 0.03), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) (p = 0.04), C-reactive protein (p = 0.01), and Apo B (p < 0.01). However, hemoglobin (p = 0.01) and Apo A1/Apo B (p < 0.01) were lower in the ACS group than the non-ACS group. Patients with Apo A1/Apo B ≥ 1.105 experienced fewer ACS compared with those with Apo A1/Apo B < 1.105 (33.33% vs. 75.56%, p = 0.03). In Cox regression, Apo A1/Apo B (RR, 0.06; 95% CI, 0.00-0.77; p = 0.03) was independently associated with ACS.

CONCLUSIONS

Apo A1/Apo B was strongly associated with ACS and may be considered as a predictor of future ACS in CAPD patients.

Complex high-risk and indicated percutaneous coronary intervention for stable angina: Does operator volume influence patient outcome?

BACKGROUND

Complex high-risk and indicated revascularization using percutaneous coronary intervention (CHIP-PCI) is an emerging concept that is poorly studied.

OBJECTIVE

To define temporal changes in CHIP-PCI volumes, and the relationship between operator CHIP-PCI volume and patient outcomes.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Data were analyzed on all CHIP-PCI procedures undertaken for stable angina in England and Wales between 2007 and 2014. Operator volume data was available for 2012-14. CHIP-PCI was defined by patient characteristics (age ≥80years, left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction <30%, previous CABG, or chronic renal failure) and/or by procedural characteristics (left main PCI, chronic total occlusion PCI, LV support, use of rotational atherectomy or laser atherectomy). CHIP-PCI as a percentage of total PCI increased from 28.1% in 2007 to 36.2% in 2014 (P < .001). Between 2012 and 2014, a total of 30,268 CHIP-PCI cases were performed. Total operator volume varied from 1 to 580 cases with median total operator volume of 29 cases. Higher operator volumes were associated with a greater degree of patient comorbidity and increasing procedural complexity. After adjustment for baseline difference, in-hospital major bleeding (P < .001 for trend), access site complications (P < .001) and coronary perforation (P = .002) were associated with increasing operator CHIP-PCI volumes. However, the frequency of in-hospital death (P = .394) and 12-month mortality (P = .638) were similar across the volume quartiles. Higher volumes quartiles were associated with a greater likelihood of same day discharge (P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

CHIP-PCI cases are an increasingly large population in contemporary PCI practice. Higher operator volumes were not associated with improved 12-month survival.

CONDENSED ABSTRACT

Data were analyzed on all complex high-risk and indicated revascularization using percutaneous coronary intervention (CHIP-PCI) procedures in England and Wales between 2007 and 2014. CHIP-PCI as a percentage of total PCI increased from 28.1% in 2007 to 36.2% in 2014 (P < .001). Median total operator volume was 29 cases with higher volumes associated with more patient comorbidity and increasing procedural complexity. In-hospital major bleeding (P < .001 for trend), access site complications (P < .001) and coronary perforation (P = .002) all associated with increasing operator CHIP-PCI volumes. However, trends for in-hospital death (P = .394), and 12-month mortality (P = .638) were similar across the volume quartiles.

Therapeutic effect of interventional therapy for unprotected left main coronary artery lesions in aged patients

Objective

To assesse the therapeutic effect of interventional therapy in aged patients with unprotected left main coronary artery (UPLM) lesions.

Methods

A total of 61 patients who were over 60 years and accepted interventional therapy of UPLM from January 2012 to November 2013 in our hospital were followed up for average 14.6 months by telephone call or outpatient visits. We analyzed the clinical features data of the interventional therapy and assessed the factors that likely influenced the clinical prognosis.

Results

The average age of the 61 patients was 73.9 years. The average left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was 47.7%. The median of the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was 52 mL/min per 1.73 mm². The average SYNTAX score was 27.4 and the median of stent length was 36 mm. The cumulative incidence of cardiac death at 30 days and major adverse cardiac events (MACE) after one year was 6.6% and 32.5% estimated by Kaplan-Meier plots respectively. No severe hemorrhagic complications were observed during follow-up period. On multivariate regression analysis with a COX proportional hazards model, LVEF was an independent predictor of cardiac death at 30 days [Hazard ratio (HR): 0.7, P = 0.01]. As for MACE after one year, LVEF and eGFR were both independent predictors (HR: 0.91, P = 0.06 for LVEF, HR: 0.03, P = 0.097 for eGFR).

Conclusions

The interventional therapy for UPLM was effective and safe in aged patients. LVEF was the only predictor of cardiac death at 30 days, while LVEF and eGFR were both independent predictors of MACE after one year.

Coronary revascularisation in older patients with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndromes

With an ageing population, older patients with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome are at higher risk of adverse outcomes but are far less likely to receive invasive revascularisation, contemporary antiplatelet therapy or drug-eluting stents than their younger counterparts. Accurate risk stratification in the older age groups may aid individualised decision-making with respect to identifying which patients will benefit most from invasive revascularisation, but more research is needed in this field. Based on current knowledge in this field, it would be appropriate following risk stratification to offer optimal medical therapy plus invasive care to older patients at high risk of future cardiovascular events but at low risk of complications and to offer optimal medical therapy alone to those who are deemed low risk of future events with high risk of developing procedural complications and severely frail patients.